Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0006098747253417969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.7262821197509766s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.48885345458984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0007429122924804688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0004124641418457031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 0080-3626 took 8.577166557312012s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用图 took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用图 took 0.0002589225769042969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用图 took 0.27092814445495605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用图 took 0.020061016082763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用图 took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用图 took 0.0007417201995849609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用图 took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用图 took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 10.12041geodata.290864223.ver1.db_ took 4.723469018936157s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 113322 took 0.0005719661712646484s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 113322 took 0.0005934238433837891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 113322 took 0.7348971366882324s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 113322 took 0.01985931396484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 113322 took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 113322 took 0.0007145404815673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 113322 took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 113322 took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 11 took 4.422922611236572s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Korepetycje Buki took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Korepetycje Buki took 0.00022554397583007812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Korepetycje Buki took 0.26723480224609375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Korepetycje Buki took 0.020551681518554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Korepetycje Buki took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Korepetycje Buki took 0.001062154769897461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Korepetycje Buki took 3.743171691894531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Korepetycje Buki took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 12323 took 2.817066192626953s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 31.124284505844116s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.0006983280181884766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.7059423923492432s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.020066261291503906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.0007572174072265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 8.797645568847656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 2000-us-census-rdf took 90.4478702545166s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 1.7952561378479004s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.0005793571472167969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.2864806652069092s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.020168066024780273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.0007336139678955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 2001-spanish-census-to-rdf took 7.706040620803833s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Open Data Web took 0.3771841526031494s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Open Data Web took 0.00029468536376953125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Open Data Web took 0.698798656463623s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Open Data Web took 0.020099639892578125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Open Data Web took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Open Data Web took 0.0007183551788330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Open Data Web took 3.552436828613281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Open Data Web took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data.odw.tw took 5.074743032455444s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用 took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用 took 0.0002665519714355469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用 took 0.6971018314361572s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用 took 0.020242691040039062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用 took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用 took 0.0007352828979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用 took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用 took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data1.odw.tw took 3.6271586418151855s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用模型 took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用模型 took 0.0006031990051269531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用模型 took 0.268984317779541s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用模型 took 0.02164173126220703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用模型 took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用模型 took 0.0007956027984619141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用模型 took 3.409385681152344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用模型 took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data2.odw.tw took 5.098869800567627s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Indian Biodiversity took 7.939338684082031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Indian Biodiversity took 0.0007159709930419922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Indian Biodiversity took 0.26619863510131836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Indian Biodiversity took 0.020143747329711914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Indian Biodiversity took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Indian Biodiversity took 0.0007343292236328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Indian Biodiversity took 2.9802322387695312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Indian Biodiversity took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _https:data.bioontology.orgontologiesBOFdownloadapikey=8b5b7825-538d-40e0-9e9e-5ab9274a9aeb&download_format=rdf took 3.3287181854248047s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 5.936622619628906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.0005245208740234375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.2553105354309082s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.020049095153808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.0007486343383789062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for a-collection-of-papers-for-lrec2014-and-related-workshops took 3.339733839035034s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ITS TEST DATASET took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.0005774497985839844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.28066277503967285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.020195722579956055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ITS TEST DATASET took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.0007040500640869141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ITS TEST DATASET took 2.86102294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ITS TEST DATASET took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for A1 took 2.853931427001953s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SummerOlympics took 11.236480474472046s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SummerOlympics took 0.0005941390991210938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SummerOlympics took 0.2624666690826416s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SummerOlympics took 0.020132780075073242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SummerOlympics took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SummerOlympics took 0.0008146762847900391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SummerOlympics took 7.05718994140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SummerOlympics took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for abc took 19.18440866470337s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Test_m took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Test_m took 0.0002808570861816406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Test_m took 0.28180575370788574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Test_m took 0.020209074020385742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Test_m took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Test_m took 0.0007746219635009766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Test_m took 2.9802322387695312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Test_m took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ABC took 2.3620917797088623s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for my intro took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for my intro took 0.00024247169494628906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for my intro took 0.28206682205200195s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for my intro took 0.020246267318725586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for my intro took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for my intro took 0.0007026195526123047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for my intro took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for my intro took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for abhay_intro took 2.321512222290039s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.5217568874359131s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.00046372413635253906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.27428531646728516s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.019911527633666992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.0006985664367675781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 9.942054748535156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 1.33514404296875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for abs-linked-data took 3.3336331844329834s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Academic Offer of UNL took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.000244140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.25876474380493164s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.020138263702392578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Academic Offer of UNL took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.0006957054138183594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Academic Offer of UNL took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Academic Offer of UNL took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for academic-offer-of-unl took 2.868335723876953s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AcadOnto took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AcadOnto took 0.0002601146697998047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AcadOnto took 0.25475502014160156s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AcadOnto took 0.02017688751220703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AcadOnto took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AcadOnto took 0.0007140636444091797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AcadOnto took 2.7418136596679688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AcadOnto took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for acadonto took 2.7426228523254395s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 11.570967435836792s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.0007081031799316406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.28426361083984375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.020046710968017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.0007276535034179688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 3.790855407714844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for acorn-sat took 43.437668561935425s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Addgene took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Addgene took 0.0008118152618408203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Addgene took 0.28847622871398926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Addgene took 0.020353078842163086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Addgene took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Addgene took 0.0007355213165283203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Addgene took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Addgene took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for addgene took 15.18448805809021s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 5.626678466796875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.0005004405975341797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.28679776191711426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.020284414291381836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.0007188320159912109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 9.417533874511719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aegp-spanish-textile-and-clothing-association took 2.884061574935913s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AEMET metereological dataset took 30.407747983932495s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.0009109973907470703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.3367478847503662s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.02036571502685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AEMET metereological dataset took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.0007097721099853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AEMET metereological dataset took 5.7697296142578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AEMET metereological dataset took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aemet took 144.39049673080444s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Agenda de Zaragoza took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.00025916099548339844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.28011584281921387s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.020568370819091797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Agenda de Zaragoza took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.0006990432739257812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Agenda de Zaragoza took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Agenda de Zaragoza took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agenda-de-zaragoza took 3.8646721839904785s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AgriNepalData took 0.03347587585449219s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AgriNepalData took 0.0002205371856689453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AgriNepalData took 0.2638392448425293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AgriNepalData took 0.020281076431274414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AgriNepalData took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AgriNepalData took 0.0007040500640869141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AgriNepalData took 6.604194641113281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AgriNepalData took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrinepaldata took 2.5171709060668945s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGRIS took 261.0564196109772s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGRIS took 0.0006823539733886719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGRIS took 0.8723001480102539s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGRIS took 0.020525455474853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGRIS took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGRIS took 0.0007770061492919922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGRIS took 8.463859558105469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGRIS took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agris took 556.1758608818054s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGROVOC took 76.77068376541138s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGROVOC took 0.0006673336029052734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGROVOC took 1.196134328842163s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGROVOC took 0.02068805694580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGROVOC took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGROVOC took 0.0007016658782958984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGROVOC took 0.00011849403381347656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGROVOC took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrovoc took 94.06567788124084s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGROVOC took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGROVOC took 0.0002715587615966797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGROVOC took 0.7067697048187256s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGROVOC took 0.02059197425842285s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGROVOC took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGROVOC took 0.0007166862487792969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGROVOC took 6.008148193359375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGROVOC took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrovoc-skos took 3.8009018898010254s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Analytics India Magazine took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Analytics India Magazine took 0.0003077983856201172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Analytics India Magazine took 0.28398609161376953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Analytics India Magazine took 0.02026653289794922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Analytics India Magazine took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Analytics India Magazine took 0.0008170604705810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Analytics India Magazine took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Analytics India Magazine took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AIM took 3.2549564838409424s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for All India Survey of Higher Education took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.00023365020751953125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.6916153430938721s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.020139694213867188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for All India Survey of Higher Education took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.0007073879241943359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for All India Survey of Higher Education took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for All India Survey of Higher Education took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AISHE took 3.6718590259552s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for  equipment ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for  equipment ontology took 0.0002856254577636719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for  equipment ontology took 0.2612004280090332s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for  equipment ontology took 0.020465612411499023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for  equipment ontology took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for  equipment ontology took 0.0007698535919189453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for  equipment ontology took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for  equipment ontology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for akash took 2.7717995643615723s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.00025534629821777344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.2851688861846924s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.02021932601928711s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.0007140636444091797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aksworg took 3.025315523147583s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AlchemyAPI took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AlchemyAPI took 0.00023055076599121094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AlchemyAPI took 0.2616426944732666s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AlchemyAPI took 0.020231962203979492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AlchemyAPI took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AlchemyAPI took 0.0007033348083496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AlchemyAPI took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AlchemyAPI took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alchemyapi took 3.450404644012451s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.0002608299255371094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.2694704532623291s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.02031731605529785s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.000701904296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alexandria-digital-library-adl-gazetteer took 2.993036985397339s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for aliada-scanbit-net took 263.140811920166s
Availability | VoID file availability check for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.0010051727294921875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.9712991714477539s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.026351451873779297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for aliada-scanbit-net took 1.8835067749023438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.0007379055023193359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.0001270771026611328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for aliada-scanbit-net took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aliada-scanbit-net took 1454.4842545986176s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Allen Brain Atlas took 5.602836608886719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.0002727508544921875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.718858003616333s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.020602941513061523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Allen Brain Atlas took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.0007107257843017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Allen Brain Atlas took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Allen Brain Atlas took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for allen-brain-atlas took 7.355890274047852s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1515474319458008s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.0006361007690429688s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 141.96103262901306s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.7173357009887695s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.7472281455993652s
Interoperability | New terms check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 3.7733819484710693s
Versatility | Languages check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 300.10355281829834s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 3.4728963375091553s
Security | Check HTTPS for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.8825218677520752s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.818493127822876s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.8505501747131348s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6151249408721924s
License | MR license check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1584041118621826s
License | HR license check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 35.10334587097168s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5826060771942139s
Understandability | Number of label check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.1075398921966553s
Understandability | URI regex check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.188021183013916s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.7000093460083008s
Verifiability | Authors check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6688625812530518s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6636903285980225s
Performance | Throughput check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 10.78816533088684s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 7.43865966796875e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6448554992675781s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.591151237487793s
Interlinking | skos check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.8917467594146729s
Interlinking | skos check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.930793285369873s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6771280765533447s
Currency | Creation date check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.0966236591339111s
Currency | Modification date check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.101003885269165s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 57.23770022392273s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5704734325408936s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6986148357391357s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6687979698181152s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 36.742772579193115s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 3.042990207672119s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.5925230979919434s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6096634864807129s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 11.51142144203186s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 8.805300951004028s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 30.731642961502075s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.3366739749908447s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 12.403433084487915s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.7563254833221436s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.8590538501739502s
Security | Sign check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.9154200553894043s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 12599.129195213318s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.0620708465576172s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.026838064193725586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.71661376953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.0007491111755371094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 7.462501525878906e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for allie-abbreviation-and-long-form-database-in-life-science took 13360.512056827545s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alojamientos took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alojamientos took 0.0002541542053222656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alojamientos took 0.6983373165130615s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alojamientos took 0.02001333236694336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alojamientos took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alojamientos took 0.0006914138793945312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alojamientos took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alojamientos took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alojamientos-zaragoza took 4.576036691665649s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.3080432415008545s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.0005936622619628906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.7076680660247803s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.01979994773864746s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.0006873607635498047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 3.528594970703125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alpino-rdf took 5.189749240875244s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AAT-atawil took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AAT-atawil took 0.0002779960632324219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AAT-atawil took 0.25955963134765625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AAT-atawil took 0.019920825958251953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AAT-atawil took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AAT-atawil took 0.0007042884826660156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AAT-atawil took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AAT-atawil took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Altawil took 2.783304452896118s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.00023937225341796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.2945091724395752s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.020096540451049805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.0007050037384033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for am-collections-online took 2.9658870697021484s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amer Nejma took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amer Nejma took 0.0002455711364746094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amer Nejma took 0.28182029724121094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amer Nejma took 0.019975662231445312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amer Nejma took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amer Nejma took 0.0007233619689941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amer Nejma took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amer Nejma took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Amer_Nejma took 2.4414472579956055s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.0002715587615966797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.27420473098754883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.02032017707824707s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.0007486343383789062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for amon took 3.386953830718994s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.6293344497680664s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.0004723072052001953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.2632310390472412s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.019960641860961914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.0006899833679199219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 8.869171142578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for amsterdam-museum-as-edm-lod took 3.8367085456848145s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.00024056434631347656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.26357245445251465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.019999265670776367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.0007131099700927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for analisi-del-blog-http-www-beppegrillo-it took 2.888885736465454s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Animal Diversity Web took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Animal Diversity Web took 0.00026869773864746094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Animal Diversity Web took 0.26155757904052734s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Animal Diversity Web took 0.0204312801361084s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Animal Diversity Web took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Animal Diversity Web took 0.0007495880126953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Animal Diversity Web took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Animal Diversity Web took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for animal-diversity-web took 2.8702259063720703s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Anime Dataset took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Anime Dataset took 0.0006504058837890625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Anime Dataset took 0.2616448402404785s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Anime Dataset took 0.02006387710571289s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Anime Dataset took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Anime Dataset took 0.0007081031799316406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Anime Dataset took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Anime Dataset took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Anime took 3.5795047283172607s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ANNO took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ANNO took 0.0014781951904296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ANNO took 0.2824563980102539s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ANNO took 0.020233869552612305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ANNO took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ANNO took 0.0006961822509765625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ANNO took 3.361701965332031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ANNO took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for anno took 8.014210939407349s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.0005161762237548828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.27550315856933594s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.02021956443786621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.0006899833679199219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 9.918212890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AntiqueCarsCollection took 3.7056751251220703s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for apache took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for apache took 0.0003292560577392578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for apache took 0.26687097549438477s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for apache took 0.020191669464111328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for apache took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for apache took 0.0007243156433105469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for apache took 5.435943603515625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for apache took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apache took 3.217390775680542s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF took 0.00033354759216308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF took 0.24177241325378418s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF took 0.0202484130859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF took 0.0007178783416748047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf took 4.902492046356201s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 4.673004150390625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.0003921985626220703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.2764623165130615s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.020413637161254883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.0011718273162841797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 5.555152893066406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-ca-it took 5.473171234130859s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 5.793571472167969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.0006561279296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.24904775619506836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.020285606384277344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-ca took 5.529545783996582s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.0005855560302734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.2618284225463867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.02176070213317871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.0012211799621582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 5.626678466796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 9.775161743164062e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-es took 5.664263010025024s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.0007612705230712891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.2922649383544922s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.02031683921813965s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.0007088184356689453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 5.078315734863281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-gl took 5.606814861297607s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.0006470680236816406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.29548168182373047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.020843982696533203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.0007121562957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-ca took 6.696877479553223s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.0006237030029296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.2651243209838867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.020296812057495117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.0007364749908447266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 4.57763671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-en took 5.505687236785889s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 6.937980651855469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.000667572021484375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.275637149810791s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.02013421058654785s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.0006892681121826172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 4.887580871582031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-es took 5.495977401733398s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.0006170272827148438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.272000789642334s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.02015399932861328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.0007128715515136719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-fr took 5.4859535694122314s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.0007219314575195312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.27863430976867676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.020592689514160156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.0007166862487792969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-an took 5.628080606460571s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.0005619525909423828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.2493143081665039s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.02013874053955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.0007033348083496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ast took 5.616514682769775s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.0007419586181640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.25006794929504395s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.020095109939575195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.0007150173187255859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ca took 24.97526502609253s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 7.62939453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.0006990432739257812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.26075172424316406s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.02025890350341797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.0007147789001464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-gl took 5.619964122772217s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 5.5789947509765625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.0007116794586181641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.28530263900756836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.020305395126342773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.0007240772247314453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 4.57763671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-pt took 5.694591760635376s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.0004589557647705078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.27531957626342773s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.02023458480834961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.0007245540618896484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ro took 5.608559608459473s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 7.724761962890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.000743865966796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.28610730171203613s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.020271778106689453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.0007090568542480469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eu-en took 5.5893659591674805s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.0006811618804931641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.27419495582580566s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.0203244686126709s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.0007028579711914062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eu-es took 5.688863277435303s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.0005817413330078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.2796306610107422s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.020102500915527344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.0007126331329345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-fr-ca took 5.6512534618377686s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.0006949901580810547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.2810399532318115s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.020231246948242188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.0007100105285644531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-fr-es took 5.6079771518707275s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.0007300376892089844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.2673206329345703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.020335912704467773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.0007464885711669922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 5.1975250244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 1.8835067749023438e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-oc-ca took 5.603273153305054s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 5.269050598144531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.0006906986236572266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.2979695796966553s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.020253896713256836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.0007190704345703125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 4.57763671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-oc-es took 5.668312072753906s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 5.6743621826171875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.0006582736968994141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.2787604331970215s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.02036738395690918s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.0007588863372802734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-pt-ca took 5.642123460769653s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 7.987022399902344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.0007703304290771484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.2656986713409424s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.02026534080505371s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.0007486343383789062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 4.744529724121094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-pt-gl took 6.328971862792969s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AragoDBPedia took 0.7319662570953369s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AragoDBPedia took 0.00061798095703125s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for AragoDBPedia took 3.1743741035461426s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for AragoDBPedia took 2.0509536266326904s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for AragoDBPedia took 0.9169661998748779s
Interoperability | New terms check for AragoDBPedia took 2.174074411392212s
Versatility | Languages check for AragoDBPedia took 60.497981548309326s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for AragoDBPedia took 5.173958778381348s
Security | Check HTTPS for AragoDBPedia took 0.26992225646972656s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for AragoDBPedia took 0.8594751358032227s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for AragoDBPedia took 0.9134550094604492s
Availability | RDF dump link check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4749436378479004s
License | MR license check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5446822643280029s
License | HR license check for AragoDBPedia took 6.198338270187378s
Amount of data | Number of property check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4926185607910156s
Understandability | Number of label check for AragoDBPedia took 0.575538158416748s
Understandability | URI regex check for AragoDBPedia took 0.9909310340881348s
Understandability | Vocabs check for AragoDBPedia took 0.49368762969970703s
Verifiability | Authors check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4037647247314453s
Verifiability | Publishers check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4418783187866211s
Performance | Throughput check for AragoDBPedia took 11.941527366638184s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for AragoDBPedia took 7.081031799316406e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4682626724243164s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4795651435852051s
Interlinking | skos check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5828142166137695s
Interlinking | skos check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4241211414337158s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5025770664215088s
Currency | Creation date check for AragoDBPedia took 1.7852466106414795s
Currency | Modification date check for AragoDBPedia took 0.45466041564941406s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for AragoDBPedia took 6.0041844844818115s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for AragoDBPedia took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for AragoDBPedia took 0.46573829650878906s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for AragoDBPedia took 0.47237086296081543s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for AragoDBPedia took 0.4320652484893799s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for AragoDBPedia took 1.200089693069458s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for AragoDBPedia took 0.030861854553222656s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for AragoDBPedia took 0.027408361434936523s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for AragoDBPedia took 0.44603991508483887s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for AragoDBPedia took 4.709966659545898s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for AragoDBPedia took 0.7438380718231201s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for AragoDBPedia took 2.8118896484375s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for AragoDBPedia took 1.3115785121917725s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for AragoDBPedia took 5.506622076034546s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for AragoDBPedia took 0.031641483306884766s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for AragoDBPedia took 0.5475406646728516s
Security | Sign check for AragoDBPedia took 0.6528189182281494s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for AragoDBPedia took 3414.8261823654175s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AragoDBPedia took 1.0474467277526855s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AragoDBPedia took 0.02108478546142578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AragoDBPedia took 2.193450927734375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AragoDBPedia took 0.0008134841918945312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AragoDBPedia took 6.079673767089844e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for AragoDBPedia took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AragoDBPedia took 1.9073486328125e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for aragodbpedia took 15606.034811735153s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archives Hub Linked Data took 30.47559952735901s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.0006747245788574219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.7191011905670166s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.020334482192993164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archives Hub Linked Data took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.0006868839263916016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archives Hub Linked Data took 4.9114227294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archives Hub Linked Data took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for archiveshub-linkeddata took 85.79772686958313s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archivi ISMA took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archivi ISMA took 0.00026106834411621094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archivi ISMA took 0.26891660690307617s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archivi ISMA took 0.02007913589477539s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archivi ISMA took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archivi ISMA took 0.0007112026214599609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archivi ISMA took 6.079673767089844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archivi ISMA took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for archivio-isma took 5.950974941253662s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ARIADNE took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ARIADNE took 0.0002415180206298828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ARIADNE took 0.7170095443725586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ARIADNE took 0.02044200897216797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ARIADNE took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ARIADNE took 0.0007278919219970703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ARIADNE took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ARIADNE took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ariadne took 3.8721983432769775s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Aristotle University took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Aristotle University took 0.0002410411834716797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Aristotle University took 0.2647974491119385s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Aristotle University took 0.0200955867767334s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Aristotle University took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Aristotle University took 0.0007274150848388672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Aristotle University took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Aristotle University took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aristotle-university took 3.4979350566864014s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 4.295740365982056s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.0005474090576171875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.2729299068450928s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.020247220993041992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.0006952285766601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 3.409385681152344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress-e-afmx-1 took 18.720128774642944s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.0002772808074951172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.2899131774902344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.020085573196411133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.0007028579711914062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 2.86102294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress_e-afmx-4 took 3.011657238006592s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 2.9575963020324707s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.00035452842712402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.25514698028564453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.019901275634765625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.0007176399230957031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 3.62396240234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress_e-mtab-104 took 13.678054571151733s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.0006606578826904297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.28990888595581055s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.020081281661987305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.0007586479187011719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 9.989738464355469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for artenuevosmedios-gnoss took 6.701641321182251s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.0002548694610595703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.27764201164245605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.020429372787475586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.0007190704345703125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Arthron took 2.3963282108306885s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Arthroscopy community took 5.698204040527344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Arthroscopy community took 0.0006356239318847656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Arthroscopy community took 0.28075551986694336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Arthroscopy community took 0.019803524017333984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Arthroscopy community took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Arthroscopy community took 0.0007407665252685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Arthroscopy community took 0.00010251998901367188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Arthroscopy community took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arthroscopy took 3.0205881595611572s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.725919246673584s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0006537437438964844s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09481549263000488s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09616899490356445s
Versatility | Languages check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.072967529296875s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08283019065856934s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08466005325317383s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0734398365020752s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09551358222961426s
License | MR license check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08704113960266113s
License | HR license check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09840941429138184s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08348655700683594s
Understandability | Number of label check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08538699150085449s
Understandability | URI regex check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.1775219440460205s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08466267585754395s
Verifiability | Authors check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08620142936706543s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0876774787902832s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0001590251922607422s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.11496877670288086s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09434390068054199s
Interlinking | skos check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0943000316619873s
Interlinking | skos check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09574699401855469s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.07219743728637695s
Currency | Creation date check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.1751251220703125s
Currency | Modification date check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.17689228057861328s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.17578339576721191s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 2.384185791015625e-07s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08429193496704102s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08519577980041504s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.07233285903930664s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.41495680809021s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.00013136863708496094s
Security | Sign check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0722966194152832s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.2583465576171875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.020314931869506836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.71661376953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0007038116455078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for artxscienceinternational-wikidata took 20.542709827423096s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 2.540853500366211s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.0006177425384521484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.28682994842529297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.020197629928588867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.0006825923919677734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 7.653236389160156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-_NTM-Formosan-Aborigines took 12.057895421981812s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 1.710101842880249s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.0005335807800292969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.6960222721099854s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.020351648330688477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.0007269382476806641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 7.700920104980469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks took 10.49770474433899s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 1.583897590637207s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.0006160736083984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.2635324001312256s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.020631790161132812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.0007047653198242188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 9.012222290039062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-AS-TFD-Fish-Species took 9.520113945007324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.949176549911499s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.0011827945709228516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.741734504699707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.02023029327392578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.0007088184356689453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-CRB took 10.002296447753906s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 1.1086950302124023s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.000720977783203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.2748231887817383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.020200252532958984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.0007302761077880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 8.797645568847656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-CTS-TV-Programs took 8.920176267623901s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.9756968021392822s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.0006792545318603516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.2714271545410156s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.02100825309753418s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.0007865428924560547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-DQOT took 8.80656623840332s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.9839801788330078s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.0006833076477050781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.26983642578125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.020259857177734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.0007188320159912109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 7.748603820800781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-IHP-WCD took 8.512823104858398s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 2.578108787536621s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.0007081031799316406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.29955029487609863s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.020243167877197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.0007033348083496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 7.82012939453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Linked-Taiwan-Artists took 11.297970294952393s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 1.0758471488952637s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.0006985664367675781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.2579324245452881s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.020282745361328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.0007097721099853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 5.412101745605469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan took 9.048811435699463s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 1.0595154762268066s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.0006239414215087891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.28429508209228516s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.02022266387939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.0007123947143554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 8.0108642578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths took 7.34003210067749s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 2.4954535961151123s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.0002529621124267578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.2483062744140625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.02037811279296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.0007529258728027344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Qing-Secret-Societies took 4.870075464248657s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.8707869052886963s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.0005865097045898438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.2762734889984131s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.020786762237548828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.0007236003875732422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 7.677078247070312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Tibetan-Audio-Archive took 7.201850175857544s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 1.0074903964996338s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.0006201267242431641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.28061413764953613s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.020300626754760742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 8.344650268554688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC_-_CCP_Archive took 6.86676025390625s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.8948268890380859s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.0006284713745117188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.2681260108947754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.020002126693725586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.0007174015045166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC_-_DNB took 8.198493480682373s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.000576019287109375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.37012720108032227s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.0199887752532959s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.0009374618530273438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 7.200241088867188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asit took 7.147461414337158s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.0006256103515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.25948476791381836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.02015519142150879s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.0006985664367675781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 3.7670135498046875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asjp took 4.838437795639038s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ASN:US took 523.8880643844604s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ASN:US took 0.0006253719329833984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ASN:US took 1.253791093826294s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ASN:US took 0.0208432674407959s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ASN:US took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ASN:US took 0.0007476806640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ASN:US took 7.414817810058594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ASN:US took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asn-us took 1341.1492640972137s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.0005877017974853516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.7283182144165039s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.0207064151763916s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.0007212162017822266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aspire-mmu took 7.031683444976807s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for associations took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for associations took 0.0004825592041015625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for associations took 0.6943011283874512s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for associations took 0.02035665512084961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for associations took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for associations took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for associations took 6.604194641113281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for associations took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for associations took 8.82940936088562s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.0002906322479248047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.25318050384521484s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.020333528518676758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.0007150173187255859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for atc-publikovan--s-kl took 4.996914386749268s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.0003819465637207031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.26546144485473633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.020325899124145508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.0007061958312988281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 9.107589721679688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for athelia-rfid took 4.007732629776001s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.0005164146423339844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.29158663749694824s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.020485639572143555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.0007004737854003906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for auditsocials-glossary took 4.579909563064575s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AUEB Linked Open Data took 5.221366882324219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.00027441978454589844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.2366325855255127s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.020953893661499023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AUEB Linked Open Data took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.0006873607635498047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AUEB Linked Open Data took 3.314018249511719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AUEB Linked Open Data took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aueb-linked-open-data took 2.903099298477173s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.5126748085021973s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.0007517337799072266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.27169251441955566s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.020535707473754883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.0007371902465820312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 5.173683166503906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AugustiniConfessiones took 4.39663028717041s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.6078131198883057s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.0004937648773193359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.264939546585083s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.02028203010559082s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.0007121562957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 8.893013000488281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for austrian_ski_racers took 3.8081345558166504s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AVsOnto took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AVsOnto took 0.0006318092346191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AVsOnto took 0.26993227005004883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AVsOnto took 0.021185636520385742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AVsOnto took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AVsOnto took 0.0007600784301757812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AVsOnto took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AVsOnto took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AVsOnto took 3.174506425857544s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.3046848773956299s
Availability | VoID file availability check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.0005435943603515625s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 166.67051148414612s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.5558052062988281s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.09818959236145s
Interoperability | New terms check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 219.16457557678223s
Versatility | Languages check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.10428762435913s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.1024549007416s
Security | Check HTTPS for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.4039573669433594s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.21039128303527832s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.12373042106628418s
Availability | RDF dump link check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.09358859062194824s
License | MR license check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 52.29234790802002s
License | HR license check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.09343552589417s
Amount of data | Number of property check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.22745752334594727s
Understandability | Number of label check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 218.11138439178467s
Understandability | URI regex check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.24677538871765137s
Understandability | Vocabs check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.11371469497680664s
Verifiability | Authors check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.09513115882873535s
Verifiability | Publishers check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.10544228553771973s
Performance | Throughput check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 10.452937602996826s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 7.200241088867188e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.09534120559692383s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.089896440506s
Interlinking | skos check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 1.977440357208252s
Interlinking | skos check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.26810145378112793s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.12661266326904297s
Currency | Creation date check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.29583144187927246s
Currency | Modification date check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.22947144508361816s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 422.7648112773895s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 3.5762786865234375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.14269089698791504s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 4.822767734527588s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.14278054237365723s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.1552937030792s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 64.24909400939941s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 3.4403841495513916s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 301.47515654563904s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.8015360832214355s
Security | Sign check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.14304614067077637s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.0850162506103516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 1.7090492248535156s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.024274349212646484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.4080276489257812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.001321554183959961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.00010514259338378906s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.1457672119140625e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for b3kat took 3903.563156604767s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BabelNet took 0.5924904346466064s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BabelNet took 0.0005865097045898438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BabelNet took 0.27340126037597656s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BabelNet took 0.020141124725341797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BabelNet took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BabelNet took 0.0007047653198242188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BabelNet took 0.00016355514526367188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BabelNet took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for babelnet took 5.420961380004883s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bacevicius.lt took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bacevicius.lt took 0.00027251243591308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bacevicius.lt took 0.2514078617095947s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bacevicius.lt took 0.02026677131652832s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bacevicius.lt took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bacevicius.lt took 0.0006957054138183594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bacevicius.lt took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bacevicius.lt took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bacevicius.lt took 2.748944044113159s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.491178035736084s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.0005543231964111328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.2969956398010254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.020365476608276367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.0007097721099853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bag took 5.5837249755859375s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.035787343978881836s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.000263214111328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.26094818115234375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0202028751373291s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0007426738739013672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue took 3.8609371185302734s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for baixue composer took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for baixue composer took 0.0006222724914550781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for baixue composer took 0.2803809642791748s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for baixue composer took 0.02027106285095215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for baixue composer took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for baixue composer took 0.0007684230804443359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for baixue composer took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for baixue composer took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_composer took 2.893920421600342s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0005707740783691406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.2609694004058838s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.021058082580566406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0008473396301269531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 5.4836273193359375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_imagery took 2.635464668273926s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 6.794929504394531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0006697177886962891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.2919139862060547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.020303010940551758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0007405281066894531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 3.170967102050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_imagery1 took 3.849825143814087s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BAMS took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BAMS took 0.00025200843811035156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BAMS took 0.26509833335876465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BAMS took 0.020366668701171875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BAMS took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BAMS took 0.0007412433624267578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BAMS took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BAMS took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bams took 3.007096767425537s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0006611347198486328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.2519536018371582s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.020931243896484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0008859634399414062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for basque-eurowordnet-lemon-lexicon-3-0 took 2.915403366088867s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Music took 0.3334360122680664s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Music took 0.001299142837524414s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Music took 0.28050804138183594s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Music took 0.0204927921295166s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Music took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Music took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Music took 0.0001323223114013672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Music took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-music took 3.5682497024536133s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Programmes took 0.23167872428894043s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Programmes took 0.0006022453308105469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Programmes took 0.27178049087524414s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Programmes took 0.020554780960083008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Programmes took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Programmes took 0.0010805130004882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Programmes took 0.00012183189392089844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Programmes took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-programmes took 8.762644052505493s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.23622822761535645s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.0007297992706298828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.24815630912780762s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.020360231399536133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Wildlife Finder took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.0007143020629882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.00010132789611816406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Wildlife Finder took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-wildlife-finder took 10.168118238449097s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBOP took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBOP took 0.0002694129943847656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBOP took 0.26546525955200195s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBOP took 0.02072906494140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBOP took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBOP took 0.0007302761077880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBOP took 3.218650817871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBOP took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbop took 2.911797523498535s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBOP took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBOP took 0.0008332729339599609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBOP took 0.2787315845489502s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBOP took 0.02028632164001465s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBOP took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBOP took 0.0007071495056152344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBOP took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBOP took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbop-selected took 18.601303339004517s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bdgp took 1.8170616626739502s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bdgp took 0.0005867481231689453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bdgp took 0.2777900695800781s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bdgp took 0.020509719848632812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bdgp took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bdgp took 0.00070953369140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bdgp took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bdgp took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bdgp took 8.767812728881836s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bendev Junior took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bendev Junior took 0.0005512237548828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bendev Junior took 0.30240559577941895s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bendev Junior took 0.020564556121826172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bendev Junior took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bendev Junior took 0.000728607177734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bendev Junior took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bendev Junior took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bendevoficial took 5.551635980606079s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 5.477153778076172s
Availability | VoID file availability check for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.0005855560302734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.2782464027404785s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.020438432693481445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.0006873607635498047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 6.604194641113281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for beneficiaries-of-the-european-commission took 14.409906387329102s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 5.435943603515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.0002186298370361328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.27709150314331055s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.020441055297851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.0007259845733642578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for berlin-offener-haushalt took 3.3527963161468506s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for berlios took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for berlios took 0.0005314350128173828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for berlios took 0.27624940872192383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for berlios took 0.020276546478271484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for berlios took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for berlios took 0.0006978511810302734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for berlios took 8.440017700195312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for berlios took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for berlios took 3.5097782611846924s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Between Our Worlds took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Between Our Worlds took 0.0005772113800048828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Between Our Worlds took 0.308758020401001s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Between Our Worlds took 0.020437002182006836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Between Our Worlds took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Between Our Worlds took 0.0007159709930419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Between Our Worlds took 8.845329284667969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Between Our Worlds took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for betweenourworlds took 9.052958250045776s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.5026974678039551s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.0005593299865722656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.28171467781066895s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.020275592803955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.0007300376892089844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 8.916854858398438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bfs-linked-data took 3.094245433807373s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BibBase took 0.05226016044616699s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BibBase took 0.0005002021789550781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BibBase took 0.2838611602783203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BibBase took 0.020279884338378906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BibBase took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BibBase took 0.0011341571807861328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BibBase took 0.00011968612670898438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BibBase took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bibbase took 2.4656994342803955s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.0005323886871337891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.2755420207977295s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.020478487014770508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.0007317066192626953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 9.846687316894531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-escolar-digital-cita took 4.429016828536987s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.0006136894226074219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.25429272651672363s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.02040839195251465s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.0007009506225585938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 9.608268737792969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-nacional-escolar-bnescolar took 3.0809524059295654s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.0002346038818359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.26847171783447266s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.020531415939331055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.0007431507110595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-virtual-miguel-de-cervantes-bvmc-linked-open-data took 2.939884662628174s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.0004239082336425781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.2717118263244629s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.02019810676574707s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.0007684230804443359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 3.695487976074219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for BibSonomy took 8.696196556091309s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.0005748271942138672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.27764058113098145s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.020311355590820312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.0007090568542480469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for billion_triples_challenge_dataset2008 took 5.215634822845459s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.0005559921264648438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.27414464950561523s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.02127385139465332s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.0009982585906982422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 3.600120544433594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for billion_triples_challenge_dataset_2010 took 2.5461578369140625s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.00025343894958496094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.27045536041259766s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.020047903060913086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.0007312297821044922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-acfsid took 2.9192657470703125s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.0396418571472168s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.0003669261932373047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.29348325729370117s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.02072882652282715s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.0007290840148925781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 9.584426879882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-affymetrix took 2.7806389331817627s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.03899526596069336s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.00038433074951171875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.2552835941314697s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.02004837989807129s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.0007357597351074219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.00010848045349121094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 3.4332275390625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-biomodels took 3.4658493995666504s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.00027871131896972656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.2530510425567627s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.020310163497924805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.0007619857788085938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-biomodels-biopax took 2.945885181427002s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.04949355125427246s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.00025844573974609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.3097982406616211s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.02031731605529785s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.0007758140563964844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.00040531158447265625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-bioportal took 4.385077953338623s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.03076648712158203s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.0003650188446044922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.2738156318664551s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.0200345516204834s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.0007050037384033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 5.2928924560546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-chembl took 3.913128614425659s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.04409384727478027s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.00048470497131347656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.284442663192749s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.02165055274963379s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.0008742809295654297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 4.935264587402344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-clinicaltrials took 4.013027191162109s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.031317949295043945s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.0006499290466308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.2488718032836914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.02036595344543457s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.0006964206695556641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 5.9604644775390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ctd took 3.260950803756714s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-dataset took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.0005910396575927734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.291501522064209s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.020090103149414062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-dataset took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.0006952285766601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-dataset took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-dataset took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-dataset took 2.636871576309204s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.01352691650390625s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.00048089027404785156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.27289795875549316s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.020319461822509766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.0007061958312988281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 6.0558319091796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-dbsnp took 3.857539415359497s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.0393671989440918s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.0004298686981201172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.27365565299987793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.02045154571533203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.0007169246673583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.000102996826171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-drugbank took 3.1361725330352783s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.03242063522338867s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.0005128383636474609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.24836134910583496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.020570755004882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Genage took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.0007302761077880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Genage took 5.245208740234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Genage took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-genage took 3.420348644256592s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.0002655982971191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.26383280754089355s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.020206212997436523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.0006945133209228516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 9.465217590332031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-genbank took 2.8711256980895996s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.03665280342102051s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.0005404949188232422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.26812100410461426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.02111053466796875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.0007708072662353516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 6.67572021484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-gendr took 3.424525022506714s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.034734487533569336s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.0002512931823730469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.24250268936157227s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.02046060562133789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Goa took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.0007035732269287109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Goa took 5.555152893066406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Goa took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-goa took 3.1224453449249268s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.04249739646911621s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.0002722740173339844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.2693164348602295s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.020711898803710938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.0007274150848388672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.00010561943054199219s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-hgnc took 3.1524696350097656s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.030888795852661133s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.0002536773681640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.2617521286010742s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.020468950271606445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.0007336139678955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 4.887580871582031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-homologene took 3.384643077850342s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::INOH took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.0002684593200683594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.24827075004577637s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.020437002182006836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::INOH took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.0007030963897705078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::INOH took 3.2901763916015625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::INOH took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-inoh took 2.8844242095947266s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.038007259368896484s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.00026679039001464844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.2588980197906494s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.020564556121826172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.0007178783416748047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 9.751319885253906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-interpro took 3.139427900314331s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.03101372718811035s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.00027108192443847656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.2684595584869385s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.020528078079223633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.0007045269012451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 7.390975952148438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-iproclass took 3.3908634185791016s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.03982853889465332s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.00027441978454589844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.2890799045562744s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.02030801773071289s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.0007119178771972656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 7.700920104980469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-irefindex took 3.4810822010040283s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.0002791881561279297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.29909396171569824s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.020685195922851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.0007104873657226562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 6.4849853515625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-kegg took 3.0136899948120117s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.0002682209014892578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.2503244876861572s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.020644426345825195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.0007376670837402344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-kegg-biopax took 2.933237314224243s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.04669928550720215s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.00026035308837890625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.2450730800628662s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.020125150680541992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.0006892681121826172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-linkedspl took 3.879957437515259s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.028943538665771484s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.0002703666687011719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.28713035583496094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.020328998565673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.0006899833679199219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-lsr took 3.4259674549102783s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.041497230529785156s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.00037217140197753906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.26326632499694824s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.020465850830078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.0007219314575195312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 7.033348083496094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-mesh took 3.213428497314453s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.04233527183532715s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.0002639293670654297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.2563169002532959s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.020141124725341797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.0007131099700927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 8.749961853027344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-mgi took 3.6348421573638916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.03337597846984863s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.0004017353057861328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.2841334342956543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.020432710647583008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.0007154941558837891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.00011348724365234375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ncbigene took 3.960444211959839s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.04398655891418457s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.00024962425231933594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.2723348140716553s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.02020716667175293s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.0007038116455078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ndc took 3.3823070526123047s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.00021505355834960938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.27922844886779785s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.020156383514404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.0007531642913818359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-netpath took 2.935849905014038s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.035977840423583984s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.0005631446838378906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.27516746520996094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.02026987075805664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.0007185935974121094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 2.86102294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-nextprot took 3.3133413791656494s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.04112720489501953s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.0002410411834716797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.2883586883544922s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.020329952239990234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Omim took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.0007123947143554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.00012540817260742188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Omim took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-omim took 3.178860902786255s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.00052642822265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.2722892761230469s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.02045154571533203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.0007116794586181641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 5.841255187988281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 2.6467514038085938s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.04209733009338379s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.0004756450653076172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.2509145736694336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.02033066749572754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.00070953369140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 7.128715515136719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-orphanet took 3.7694828510284424s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.03198814392089844s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.000293731689453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.253584623336792s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.020606279373168945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.00072479248046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 3.552436828613281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pathwaycommons took 3.9257912635803223s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.039492130279541016s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.0005304813385009766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.2470693588256836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.020303726196289062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.000743865966796875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 7.343292236328125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pharmgkb took 3.4897289276123047s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.0003426074981689453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.26973414421081543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.020529747009277344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.000762939453125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pharmgkb-biopax took 2.960113048553467s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PID took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.0003077983856201172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.2764601707458496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.020527362823486328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PID took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.0008280277252197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PID took 3.504753112792969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PID took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pid took 2.995213747024536s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 9.250640869140625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.0003020763397216797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.2889385223388672s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.020349502563476562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.0007033348083496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pubchem-2 took 2.9518320560455322s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.04049420356750488s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.0004956722259521484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.2452857494354248s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.02024555206298828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.0007450580596923828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.00013756752014160156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pubmed took 8.437863826751709s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 5.602836608886719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.00028252601623535156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.2633347511291504s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.020186901092529297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.0007226467132568359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 6.890296936035156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-reactome took 3.0023038387298584s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.00024700164794921875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.27234673500061035s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.020188331604003906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.000728607177734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 5.221366882324219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-rhea took 2.847154378890991s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.02153611183166504s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.00025391578674316406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.2515265941619873s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.020274639129638672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.0007126331329345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 7.319450378417969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sabiork took 3.9674525260925293s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.04495692253112793s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.0006306171417236328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.2761707305908203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.02036571502685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.0007791519165039062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.00010371208190917969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sgd took 3.5148420333862305s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.0005691051483154297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.2640955448150635s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.020200729370117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.0007302761077880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 3.457069396972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 2.697882652282715s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.05852842330932617s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.0004813671112060547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.2665135860443115s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.020694732666015625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sider took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sider took 3.790855407714844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sider took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sider took 3.4676895141601562s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 6.985664367675781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.00026488304138183594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.28255414962768555s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.020445823669433594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.0007126331329345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 3.218650817871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-spike took 2.8643693923950195s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-taxon took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.0006380081176757812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.253645658493042s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.020870447158813477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-taxon took 1.7642974853515625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.0007531642913818359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-taxon took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-taxon took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-taxon took 2.633399724960327s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.04657864570617676s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.0004673004150390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.283174991607666s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.020459890365600586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.0007331371307373047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 9.846687316894531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-taxonomy took 3.4780101776123047s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.043317556381225586s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.00047206878662109375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.28798913955688477s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.02056741714477539s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.0007309913635253906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 3.218650817871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-wikipathways took 4.19667649269104s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.052076101303100586s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.0004780292510986328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.28862428665161133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.020680665969848633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.0007259845733642578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 7.557868957519531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-wormbase took 3.9501612186431885s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biografías y Vidas took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biografías y Vidas took 0.0002536773681640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biografías y Vidas took 0.2696540355682373s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biografías y Vidas took 0.020526885986328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biografías y Vidas took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biografías y Vidas took 0.0007114410400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biografías y Vidas took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biografías y Vidas took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biografiasyvidas took 2.366680860519409s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.2563471794128418s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.0005047321319580078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.27510881423950195s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.02004218101501465s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.0007145404815673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 8.20159912109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biographical-directory-of-the-united-states-congress took 2.697924852371216s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.0002357959747314453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.2631502151489258s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.020157575607299805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.0006909370422363281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biolit took 2.8958632946014404s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.0006356239318847656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.2872292995452881s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.020325183868408203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 3.910064697265625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 1.9311904907226562e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for biolod-pdb took 8.153322458267212s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioModels RDF took 0.48337316513061523s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioModels RDF took 0.0005452632904052734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioModels RDF took 0.2541518211364746s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioModels RDF took 0.020285606384277344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioModels RDF took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioModels RDF took 0.0007050037384033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioModels RDF took 3.62396240234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioModels RDF took 1.1444091796875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for biomodels-rdf took 3.735380172729492s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 2.5440969467163086s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.0006816387176513672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.279738187789917s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.020191431045532227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Biop took 6.750346660614014s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.0006115436553955078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.28325939178466797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.020142555236816406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.0008602142333984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 3.457069396972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bioportal took 2.484980583190918s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0006201267242431641s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0004901885986328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.2998640537261963s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.020012855529785156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amphibian gross anatomy took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0006895065307617188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0006313323974609375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amphibian gross anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aao took 2.7878499031066895s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.0005016326904296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.2986633777618408s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.020234346389770508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.0006973743438720703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.0002913475036621094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aba took 2.65958833694458s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.00047516822814941406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.27358412742614746s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.020418643951416016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.0007004737854003906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.0014851093292236328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-acgt took 2.7018842697143555s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Animal natural history and life history took 5.14984130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Animal natural history and life history took 0.0005023479461669922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Animal natural history and life history took 0.2698352336883545s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Animal natural history and life history took 0.020341157913208008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Animal natural history and life history took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Animal natural history and life history took 0.0007030963897705078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Animal natural history and life history took 0.000335693359375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Animal natural history and life history took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-adw took 2.6706326007843018s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.00048542022705078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.28221917152404785s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.020036697387695312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.0007312297821044922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.0004506111145019531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aeo took 2.566546678543091s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0005576610565185547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.27340197563171387s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.019934892654418945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0006918907165527344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0009801387786865234s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aero took 2.618441581726074s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AI/RHEUM took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AI/RHEUM took 0.0008132457733154297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AI/RHEUM took 0.28540468215942383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AI/RHEUM took 0.020894289016723633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AI/RHEUM took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AI/RHEUM took 0.0007524490356445312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AI/RHEUM took 0.0004322528839111328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AI/RHEUM took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-air took 2.630039930343628s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amino Acid took 5.125999450683594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amino Acid took 0.0005023479461669922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amino Acid took 0.25508570671081543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amino Acid took 0.019980669021606445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amino Acid took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amino Acid took 0.0007152557373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amino Acid took 0.0002493858337402344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amino Acid took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-amino-acid took 2.618523120880127s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.00025582313537597656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.30325794219970703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.02051520347595215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.0007169246673583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.000293731689453125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-apo took 2.5825483798980713s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for African Traditional Medicine took 4.887580871582031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for African Traditional Medicine took 0.0003483295440673828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for African Traditional Medicine took 0.2761406898498535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for African Traditional Medicine took 0.020140647888183594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for African Traditional Medicine took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for African Traditional Medicine took 0.0006964206695556641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for African Traditional Medicine took 0.0002415180206298828s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for African Traditional Medicine took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-atmo took 2.783831834793091s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amphibian taxonomy took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.0004620552062988281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.27103567123413086s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.020767927169799805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amphibian taxonomy took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.0007476806640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amphibian taxonomy took 9.441375732421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amphibian taxonomy took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ato took 2.582967758178711s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioAssay Ontology took 7.462501525878906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0004971027374267578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioAssay Ontology took 0.28290462493896484s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioAssay Ontology took 0.019956588745117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioAssay Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0007145404815673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0013225078582763672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioAssay Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bao took 2.581122398376465s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.0005283355712890625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.25264739990234375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.020266294479370117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.0007076263427734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.00037598609924316406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-basic-vertebrate-gross-anatomy took 2.58487606048584s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 4.887580871582031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.0005395412445068359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.25662970542907715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.02002692222595215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.0007119178771972656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.0003204345703125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bcgo took 2.5809853076934814s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.0005259513854980469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.2886085510253906s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.020417213439941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.0007178783416748047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.0013966560363769531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bdo took 2.641676902770996s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basic Formal Ontology took 5.602836608886719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0005118846893310547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.26534390449523926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.020534515380859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basic Formal Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0007443428039550781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0004949569702148438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basic Formal Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bfo took 2.6781201362609863s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bleeding History Phenotype took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.000484466552734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.2625572681427002s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.020349502563476562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bleeding History Phenotype took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.0007255077362060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.0007150173187255859s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bleeding History Phenotype took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bho took 2.5908050537109375s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bilateria anatomy took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bilateria anatomy took 0.0004630088806152344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bilateria anatomy took 0.25823283195495605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bilateria anatomy took 0.020072460174560547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bilateria anatomy took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bilateria anatomy took 0.0007016658782958984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bilateria anatomy took 0.00042629241943359375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bilateria anatomy took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bila took 2.5831573009490967s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BIRNLex took 8.606910705566406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BIRNLex took 0.0005443096160888672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BIRNLex took 0.3002307415008545s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BIRNLex took 0.020991802215576172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BIRNLex took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BIRNLex took 0.0007295608520507812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BIRNLex took 0.0015192031860351562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BIRNLex took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-birnlex took 2.705841541290283s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0004723072052001953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.26794886589050293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.02048182487487793s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Regulation Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007071495056152344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007326602935791016s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Regulation Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bootstrep took 2.672966480255127s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioPAX took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioPAX took 0.0004858970642089844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioPAX took 0.28350019454956055s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioPAX took 0.020267963409423828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioPAX took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioPAX took 0.0007610321044921875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioPAX took 9.965896606445312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioPAX took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bp took 2.703847646713257s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.0004711151123046875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.27806663513183594s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.02008652687072754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.00032448768615722656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bro_x1 took 2.7030229568481445s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Spatial Ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Spatial Ontology took 0.0004894733428955078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Spatial Ontology took 0.25006103515625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Spatial Ontology took 0.02017521858215332s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Spatial Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Spatial Ontology took 0.0007224082946777344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Spatial Ontology took 0.0002193450927734375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Spatial Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bspo took 2.5910325050354004s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioTop took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioTop took 0.0005192756652832031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioTop took 0.2724301815032959s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioTop took 0.020198822021484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioTop took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioTop took 0.0007257461547851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioTop took 0.0006983280181884766s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioTop took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bt took 2.6480679512023926s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 7.62939453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.00047659873962402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.2866251468658447s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.020017623901367188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.0007271766662597656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.0008959770202636719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bto took 2.676382064819336s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0005633831024169922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.3174464702606201s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.02067422866821289s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0007143020629882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0018780231475830078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-canco took 3.0208089351654053s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CAO took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CAO took 0.0005338191986083984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CAO took 0.26616621017456055s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CAO took 0.02014303207397461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CAO took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CAO took 0.0006949901580810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CAO took 0.000583648681640625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CAO took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cao took 2.6775238513946533s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CareLex took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CareLex took 0.0004971027374267578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CareLex took 0.2746751308441162s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CareLex took 0.02057790756225586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CareLex took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CareLex took 0.00077056884765625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CareLex took 5.340576171875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CareLex took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-carelex took 2.6118862628936768s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell Cycle Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.00047278404235839844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.3040447235107422s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.020258426666259766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell Cycle Ontology took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.000720977783203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.0008003711700439453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell Cycle Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cco took 2.710038900375366s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.0004775524139404297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.25107526779174805s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.020429372787475586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.0002601146697998047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cdao took 2.6058332920074463s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical entities of biological interest took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0005052089691162109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.26061129570007324s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.020467519760131836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical entities of biological interest took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0007317066192626953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0007741451263427734s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical entities of biological interest took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-chebi took 2.656501293182373s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.0005335807800292969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.24407100677490234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.020163297653198242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.0007014274597167969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.00024509429931640625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-chem2bio2owl took 2.5994110107421875s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical Information Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.00047969818115234375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.27528834342956543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.021017789840698242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical Information Ontology took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0007658004760742188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0008208751678466797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical Information Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cheminf took 2.656348705291748s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell type took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell type took 0.0005495548248291016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell type took 0.2639744281768799s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell type took 0.020123004913330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell type took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell type took 0.000701904296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell type took 0.00037217140197753906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell type took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cl took 2.6757729053497314s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell Line Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell Line Ontology took 0.0004782676696777344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell Line Ontology took 0.30145955085754395s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell Line Ontology took 0.020200490951538086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell Line Ontology took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell Line Ontology took 0.0007488727569580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell Line Ontology took 0.0007967948913574219s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell Line Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-clo took 2.7326626777648926s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 4.744529724121094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.00047659873962402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.25470614433288574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.020480871200561523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.0007135868072509766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.00016689300537109375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cmo took 2.628344774246216s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.000484466552734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.2684922218322754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.020269393920898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.0007588863372802734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.00020360946655273438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cno took 2.6628427505493164s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Wheat trait took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Wheat trait took 0.0005452632904052734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Wheat trait took 0.2716033458709717s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Wheat trait took 0.020588159561157227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Wheat trait took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Wheat trait took 0.000705718994140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Wheat trait took 5.364418029785156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Wheat trait took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-co_wheat took 2.6837990283966064s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cognitive Atlas took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cognitive Atlas took 0.0006055831909179688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cognitive Atlas took 0.2594904899597168s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cognitive Atlas took 0.020276308059692383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cognitive Atlas took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cognitive Atlas took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cognitive Atlas took 0.0003485679626464844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cognitive Atlas took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cogat took 2.6784541606903076s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.0002818107604980469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.2799701690673828s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.020389080047607422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.0007033348083496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.0007519721984863281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cogpo took 2.726998805999756s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Current Procedural Terminology took 4.76837158203125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0005509853363037109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.2573277950286865s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0203397274017334s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Current Procedural Terminology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0006971359252929688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0004105567932128906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Current Procedural Terminology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cpt took 2.545931339263916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.00043082237243652344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.28754115104675293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.02036595344543457s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.000690460205078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.0017464160919189453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-csp took 3.010834217071533s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for COSTART took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for COSTART took 0.00026607513427734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for COSTART took 0.26407909393310547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for COSTART took 0.020247697830200195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for COSTART took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for COSTART took 0.0007159709930419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for COSTART took 0.0009655952453613281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for COSTART took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cst took 2.541898250579834s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.00047850608825683594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.263031005859375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.0200955867767334s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.000698089599609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.00048804283142089844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ctcae took 2.613790273666382s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0004773139953613281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.28716564178466797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.02001190185546875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0007154941558837891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0004487037658691406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ctx took 2.585115432739258s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dendritic cell took 5.626678466796875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dendritic cell took 0.0005156993865966797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dendritic cell took 0.26983094215393066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dendritic cell took 0.019876956939697266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dendritic cell took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dendritic cell took 0.0007390975952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dendritic cell took 0.00029087066650390625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dendritic cell took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-dc_cl took 2.6240150928497314s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.0005490779876708984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.2851238250732422s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.020365238189697266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.0009601116180419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.00011444091796875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ddanat took 2.5782721042633057s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.000423431396484375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.24966001510620117s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.020351648330688477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.0007176399230957031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.0009853839874267578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ddi took 2.513340711593628s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Diagnostic Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.00034427642822265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.26375317573547363s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.02034735679626465s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Diagnostic Ontology took 1.811981201171875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.0007157325744628906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Diagnostic Ontology took 9.655952453613281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Diagnostic Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-diagnosticont took 2.750338315963745s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.0004367828369140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.2615396976470947s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.020357131958007812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.0007119178771972656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.0001621246337890625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-dikb-evidence took 2.5566558837890625s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human disease ontology took 5.53131103515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human disease ontology took 0.0002772808074951172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human disease ontology took 0.2408895492553711s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human disease ontology took 0.02017974853515625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human disease ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human disease ontology took 0.0007195472717285156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human disease ontology took 0.0006232261657714844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human disease ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-doid took 2.5065269470214844s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Electrocardiography Ontology took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.00048613548278808594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.25200867652893066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.020482540130615234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Electrocardiography Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.0007638931274414062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.0008249282836914062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Electrocardiography Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ecg took 2.5498733520507812s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Evidence codes took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Evidence codes took 0.0004150867462158203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Evidence codes took 0.2756307125091553s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Evidence codes took 0.020305633544921875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Evidence codes took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Evidence codes took 0.0007076263427734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Evidence codes took 3.4332275390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Evidence codes took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-eco took 2.5931143760681152s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Experimental Factor Ontology took 6.175041198730469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.0003476142883300781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.3173964023590088s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.020531415939331055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Experimental Factor Ontology took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.0007939338684082031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.0018839836120605469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Experimental Factor Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-efo took 2.9833874702453613s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0004131793975830078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.26630544662475586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.02049875259399414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0011708736419677734s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehda took 2.569790840148926s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0004220008850097656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.23596858978271484s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.02035355567932129s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0007574558258056641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0007424354553222656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehdaa took 2.716336727142334s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0003342628479003906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.2503340244293213s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.020318269729614258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0007278919219970703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0005278587341308594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehdaa2 took 2.535806179046631s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.0004467964172363281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.24785900115966797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.020191192626953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.0007097721099853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 3.457069396972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-emap took 2.540804386138916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Environment Ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Environment Ontology took 0.0004506111145019531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Environment Ontology took 0.2495863437652588s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Environment Ontology took 0.020311832427978516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Environment Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Environment Ontology took 0.0006868839263916016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Environment Ontology took 0.00041174888610839844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Environment Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-envo took 2.5227274894714355s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant environmental conditions took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant environmental conditions took 0.0005443096160888672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant environmental conditions took 0.26350927352905273s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant environmental conditions took 0.020303964614868164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant environmental conditions took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant environmental conditions took 0.0007791519165039062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant environmental conditions took 0.0003097057342529297s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant environmental conditions took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-eo took 2.6170825958251953s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.0005049705505371094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.2653474807739258s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.020471572875976562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.0006952285766601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.0012295246124267578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ep took 2.6574277877807617s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Epilepsy took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Epilepsy took 0.0004780292510986328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Epilepsy took 0.2642223834991455s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Epilepsy took 0.020344018936157227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Epilepsy took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Epilepsy took 0.0007104873657226562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Epilepsy took 0.0001308917999267578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Epilepsy took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-epileponto took 2.7038698196411133s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for eagle-i research resource ontology took 7.104873657226562e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.0005466938018798828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.27787303924560547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.020146608352661133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for eagle-i research resource ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.0006914138793945312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.0011217594146728516s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for eagle-i research resource ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ero took 2.6275904178619385s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0005321502685546875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.2625150680541992s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.020464658737182617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0007371902465820312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0011146068572998047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ev took 2.766995906829834s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ExO took 6.151199340820312e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ExO took 0.0005137920379638672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ExO took 0.2778637409210205s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ExO took 0.020267248153686523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ExO took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ExO took 0.0006949901580810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ExO took 0.0002532005310058594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ExO took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-exo took 2.626218795776367s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fungal gross anatomy took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.0011119842529296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.2605283260345459s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.020497798919677734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fungal gross anatomy took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.0007297992706298828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.00010991096496582031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fungal gross anatomy took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fao took 2.5707333087921143s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biological imaging methods took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biological imaging methods took 0.0004730224609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biological imaging methods took 0.27036380767822266s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biological imaging methods took 0.020346641540527344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biological imaging methods took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biological imaging methods took 0.0007259845733642578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biological imaging methods took 0.00020551681518554688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biological imaging methods took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbbi took 2.620338201522827s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Drosophila gross anatomy took 6.604194641113281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.00047659873962402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.27259325981140137s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.020217180252075195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Drosophila gross anatomy took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.0007066726684570312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.0006458759307861328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Drosophila gross anatomy took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbbt took 2.656956911087036s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.0005471706390380859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.2748596668243408s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.020367860794067383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.0007276535034179688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.000431060791015625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbcv took 2.6752965450286865s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Drosophila development took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Drosophila development took 0.0006151199340820312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Drosophila development took 0.2796487808227539s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Drosophila development took 0.020201921463012695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Drosophila development took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Drosophila development took 0.0006952285766601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Drosophila development took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Drosophila development took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbdv took 2.686136245727539s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fly taxonomy took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fly taxonomy took 0.0003886222839355469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fly taxonomy took 0.26290178298950195s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fly taxonomy took 0.020258188247680664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fly taxonomy took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fly taxonomy took 0.0019071102142333984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fly taxonomy took 0.0004074573516845703s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fly taxonomy took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbsp took 2.674858570098877s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 5.6743621826171875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0004737377166748047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.25960278511047363s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.020141124725341797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0007226467132568359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0002281665802001953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fda-meddevice took 2.648768186569214s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Family Health History Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Family Health History Ontology took 0.0004818439483642578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Family Health History Ontology took 0.2622194290161133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Family Health History Ontology took 0.020087480545043945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Family Health History Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Family Health History Ontology took 0.0007114410400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Family Health History Ontology took 0.00044465065002441406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Family Health History Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fhho took 2.5830695629119873s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Influenza Ontology took 5.650520324707031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Influenza Ontology took 0.000453948974609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Influenza Ontology took 0.265270471572876s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Influenza Ontology took 0.020592451095581055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Influenza Ontology took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Influenza Ontology took 0.0007302761077880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Influenza Ontology took 0.0010538101196289062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Influenza Ontology took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-flu took 2.5930864810943604s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.0004630088806152344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.2526521682739258s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.020531415939331055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.0007123947143554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 6.67572021484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fma took 2.6082465648651123s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 6.413459777832031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.0005269050598144531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.27663326263427734s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.020312786102294922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.00013136863708496094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fypo took 2.6330718994140625s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for GeoSpecies Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.00025725364685058594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.2651646137237549s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.02034306526184082s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for GeoSpecies Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.0007152557373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for GeoSpecies Ontology took 9.036064147949219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for GeoSpecies Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-geospecies took 2.6836233139038086s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for General Formal Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for General Formal Ontology took 0.0004980564117431641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for General Formal Ontology took 0.2663843631744385s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for General Formal Ontology took 0.020575523376464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for General Formal Ontology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for General Formal Ontology took 0.0007169246673583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for General Formal Ontology took 0.00017261505126953125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for General Formal Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gfo took 2.6320159435272217s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0002651214599609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.2714991569519043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.020359516143798828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0007231235504150391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0005888938903808594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gfo-bio took 2.6580207347869873s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0006723403930664062s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0005497932434082031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.2624025344848633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.020474672317504883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Ontology Extension took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0007338523864746094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0008788108825683594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Ontology Extension took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-go_x1 took 2.6547486782073975s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Ontology took 0.0005133152008056641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Ontology took 0.3047819137573242s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Ontology took 0.020264863967895508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Ontology took 0.0007369518280029297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Ontology took 0.0008270740509033203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-go_x2 took 2.67763614654541s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cereal Plant Development took 5.3882598876953125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cereal Plant Development took 0.0004801750183105469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cereal Plant Development took 0.28491735458374023s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cereal Plant Development took 0.02049398422241211s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cereal Plant Development took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cereal Plant Development took 0.0007631778717041016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cereal Plant Development took 3.24249267578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cereal Plant Development took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro took 2.6175537109375s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.0005624294281005859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.28521728515625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.02042984962463379s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.0007417201995849609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.00044798851013183594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro_x1 took 2.9146573543548584s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 7.62939453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0004875659942626953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.2568798065185547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.02064681053161621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Regulation Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007536411285400391s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Regulation Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro_x2 took 2.7707014083862305s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0005323886871337891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.26625657081604004s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.020093202590942383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0007078647613525391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.000553131103515625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hao took 2.6100234985351562s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HCPCS took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HCPCS took 0.0004601478576660156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HCPCS took 0.26304197311401367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HCPCS took 0.01992654800415039s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HCPCS took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HCPCS took 0.0006923675537109375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HCPCS took 0.00024700164794921875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HCPCS took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hcpcs took 2.553412675857544s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Health Level Seven took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Health Level Seven took 0.0004792213439941406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Health Level Seven took 0.2578434944152832s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Health Level Seven took 0.02016305923461914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Health Level Seven took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Health Level Seven took 0.0007195472717285156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Health Level Seven took 0.0012531280517578125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Health Level Seven took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hl7 took 2.6013529300689697s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.0005564689636230469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.26745080947875977s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.020228862762451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.0007264614105224609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.00033926963806152344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hlth_indics took 2.6464192867279053s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.0005426406860351562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.27246880531311035s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.020287036895751953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.0007033348083496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hom took 2.6627326011657715s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HOM-HARVARD took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HOM-HARVARD took 0.0002722740173339844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HOM-HARVARD took 0.2469191551208496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HOM-HARVARD took 0.020381927490234375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HOM-HARVARD took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HOM-HARVARD took 0.0007309913635253906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HOM-HARVARD took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HOM-HARVARD took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hom_harvard took 2.537276268005371s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human Phenotype Ontology took 5.340576171875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.00045871734619140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.2747824192047119s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.020257234573364258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human Phenotype Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0007288455963134766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0006439685821533203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human Phenotype Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hp_x1 took 2.6335268020629883s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 5.078315734863281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.0005044937133789062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.27129435539245605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.020110368728637695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.0007572174072265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.001058340072631836s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hpio took 2.6226911544799805s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HUGO took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HUGO took 0.0005044937133789062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HUGO took 0.28977203369140625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HUGO took 0.020172595977783203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HUGO took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HUGO took 0.0007479190826416016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HUGO took 7.915496826171875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HUGO took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hugo took 2.6088616847991943s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Information Artifact Ontology took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.00038623809814453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.26734471321105957s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.02010345458984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Information Artifact Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.0007107257843017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.0006616115570068359s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Information Artifact Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-iao took 2.753303050994873s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD10 took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD10 took 0.0005626678466796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD10 took 0.27701854705810547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD10 took 0.020180225372314453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD10 took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD10 took 0.0007531642913818359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD10 took 0.0008103847503662109s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD10 took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10 took 2.6605706214904785s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD10CM took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD10CM took 0.000469207763671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD10CM took 0.27866196632385254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD10CM took 0.020144939422607422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD10CM took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD10CM took 0.0007300376892089844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD10CM took 0.0006024837493896484s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD10CM took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10cm took 2.5941905975341797s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD-10-PCS took 6.604194641113281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD-10-PCS took 0.0002715587615966797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD-10-PCS took 0.25956106185913086s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD-10-PCS took 0.020235300064086914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD-10-PCS took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD-10-PCS took 0.0007288455963134766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD-10-PCS took 0.0001513957977294922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD-10-PCS took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10pcs took 2.673854112625122s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Diseases took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0006527900695800781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Diseases took 0.26840734481811523s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Diseases took 0.020435571670532227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Diseases took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0008437633514404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0007512569427490234s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Diseases took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd9cm took 2.651031255722046s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0006620883941650391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.2590765953063965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.02016472816467285s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0007059574127197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0004677772521972656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icf_x1 took 2.756376028060913s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 8.630752563476562e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0005199909210205078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.24663209915161133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.02038884162902832s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0008127689361572266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0012805461883544922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icnp took 2.7065048217773438s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Primary Care took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.00047707557678222656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.2505955696105957s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.01998305320739746s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Primary Care took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.0007472038269042969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.0004661083221435547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Primary Care took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icpc took 2.5906970500946045s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICPC-2 PLUS took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0005257129669189453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.26328086853027344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.020093441009521484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICPC-2 PLUS took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0007135868072509766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0008559226989746094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICPC-2 PLUS took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icpc2p took 2.642484664916992s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICPS Network took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICPS Network took 0.0004763603210449219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICPS Network took 0.2894096374511719s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICPS Network took 0.020032644271850586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICPS Network took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICPS Network took 0.0006968975067138672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICPS Network took 0.0002148151397705078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICPS Network took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icps took 2.63940167427063s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Infectious Disease Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0005669593811035156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.2860543727874756s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.020263671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Infectious Disease Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0008449554443359375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Infectious Disease Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ido took 2.6610617637634277s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brucellosis Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0004868507385253906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.2725789546966553s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.02015995979309082s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brucellosis Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0007145404815673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0011255741119384766s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brucellosis Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-idobru took 2.6565370559692383s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Malaria Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Malaria Ontology took 0.0005104541778564453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Malaria Ontology took 0.26502275466918945s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Malaria Ontology took 0.020098209381103516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Malaria Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Malaria Ontology took 0.0007326602935791016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Malaria Ontology took 0.0012865066528320312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Malaria Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-idomal took 2.6811106204986572s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 7.748603820800781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.0005788803100585938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.2858116626739502s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.02037835121154785s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.0007648468017578125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.0003113746643066406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-iev took 2.649012565612793s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.00047779083251953125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.27381467819213867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.02021026611328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.0007178783416748047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.00014591217041015625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-imgt took 2.6088099479675293s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0005047321319580078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.2584857940673828s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.020222902297973633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0007033348083496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0005123615264892578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-imr took 2.723747968673706s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Interaction Network Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0004832744598388672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.26085424423217773s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.020209312438964844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Interaction Network Ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0007162094116210938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0008368492126464844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Interaction Network Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ino took 2.593322515487671s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Hewan Invertebrata took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.0005102157592773438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.2507174015045166s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.02023601531982422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Hewan Invertebrata took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.0007119178771972656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Hewan Invertebrata took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Hewan Invertebrata took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-invertebrata took 2.6304237842559814s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for IxnO took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for IxnO took 0.0005710124969482422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for IxnO took 0.2741665840148926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for IxnO took 0.02006244659423828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for IxnO took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for IxnO took 0.0007040500640869141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for IxnO took 0.00018310546875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for IxnO took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ixno took 2.6181089878082275s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SysMO-JERM took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SysMO-JERM took 0.0005109310150146484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SysMO-JERM took 0.2753410339355469s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SysMO-JERM took 0.020486116409301758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SysMO-JERM took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SysMO-JERM took 0.0007011890411376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SysMO-JERM took 0.0003783702850341797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SysMO-JERM took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-jerm took 2.607612133026123s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.00045800209045410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.27520251274108887s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.02081441879272461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.0007731914520263672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-kisao took 2.7637805938720703s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Loggerhead nesting took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Loggerhead nesting took 0.0005497932434082031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Loggerhead nesting took 0.2602522373199463s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Loggerhead nesting took 0.020318269729614258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Loggerhead nesting took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Loggerhead nesting took 0.0007083415985107422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Loggerhead nesting took 0.000194549560546875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Loggerhead nesting took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lhn took 2.6013023853302s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Lipid Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Lipid Ontology took 0.0005080699920654297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Lipid Ontology took 0.2696373462677002s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Lipid Ontology took 0.020125865936279297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Lipid Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Lipid Ontology took 0.0007729530334472656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Lipid Ontology took 0.0002148151397705078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Lipid Ontology took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lipro took 2.5678536891937256s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0005552768707275391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.31807637214660645s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.020345687866210938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0006871223449707031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0018279552459716797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lnc took 3.096004009246826s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.00052642822265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.2706265449523926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.020144224166870117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.0007724761962890625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.0006809234619140625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ma took 2.6158816814422607s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Multiple alignment took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Multiple alignment took 0.0005385875701904297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Multiple alignment took 0.2659883499145508s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Multiple alignment took 0.020212173461914062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Multiple alignment took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Multiple alignment took 0.0007808208465576172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Multiple alignment took 0.0002033710479736328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Multiple alignment took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mao took 2.578742742538452s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Minimal anatomical terminology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0005071163177490234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.2819080352783203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.020184040069580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Minimal anatomical terminology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0007669925689697266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0007061958312988281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Minimal anatomical terminology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mat took 2.7026236057281494s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Breast tissue cell lines took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.0004711151123046875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.2724132537841797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.02024674415588379s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Breast tissue cell lines took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.0007011890411376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.00040721893310546875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Breast tissue cell lines took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mcbcc took 2.6270675659179688s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell line ontology took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell line ontology took 0.0005385875701904297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell line ontology took 0.27211737632751465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell line ontology took 0.02019643783569336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell line ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell line ontology took 0.0007085800170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell line ontology took 0.0007581710815429688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell line ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mccl took 2.672990322113037s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell line ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell line ontology took 0.0005025863647460938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell line ontology took 0.26047325134277344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell line ontology took 0.020456552505493164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell line ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell line ontology took 0.0006909370422363281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell line ontology took 0.001390218734741211s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell line ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mccl_x1 took 2.660823106765747s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.0005578994750976562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.2929408550262451s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.020077228546142578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.0007085800170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.0002315044403076172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mcv took 2.670405149459839s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Master Drug Data Base took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Master Drug Data Base took 0.0005061626434326172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Master Drug Data Base took 0.28924036026000977s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Master Drug Data Base took 0.020294904708862305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Master Drug Data Base took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Master Drug Data Base took 0.0007004737854003906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Master Drug Data Base took 0.00017023086547851562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Master Drug Data Base took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mddb took 2.6459178924560547s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MedDRA took 8.320808410644531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MedDRA took 0.0005376338958740234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MedDRA took 0.255573034286499s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MedDRA took 0.020256757736206055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MedDRA took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MedDRA took 0.0007548332214355469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MedDRA took 0.0011196136474609375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MedDRA took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mdr took 2.6663546562194824s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0005185604095458984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.25789880752563477s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.019985437393188477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0007092952728271484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.00089263916015625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-medlineplus took 2.59848952293396s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MeGO took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MeGO took 0.0004942417144775391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MeGO took 0.2705106735229492s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MeGO took 0.02060842514038086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MeGO took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MeGO took 0.0009174346923828125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MeGO took 0.00018596649169921875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MeGO took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mego took 2.7122271060943604s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0005671977996826172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.30336856842041016s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.020323991775512695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0007181167602539062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0017919540405273438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mesh-owl took 3.1190590858459473s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mental Functioning Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.0005595684051513672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.2855713367462158s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.020110368728637695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mental Functioning Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.000751495361328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.0006191730499267578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mental Functioning Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mf took 2.643902540206909s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0005071163177490234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.2577834129333496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0201568603515625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0006947517395019531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0005478858947753906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mfo took 2.6385438442230225s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Emotion Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Emotion Ontology took 0.0005064010620117188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Emotion Ontology took 0.25627875328063965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Emotion Ontology took 0.020010948181152344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Emotion Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Emotion Ontology took 0.000701904296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Emotion Ontology took 0.00075531005859375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Emotion Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mfoem took 2.5816800594329834s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.0005309581756591797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.2599337100982666s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.02016592025756836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.0006995201110839844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.00010061264038085938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mhc took 2.597672462463379s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Protein-protein interaction took 5.888938903808594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0005424022674560547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Protein-protein interaction took 0.30052709579467773s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Protein-protein interaction took 0.020264625549316406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Protein-protein interaction took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0007205009460449219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0006592273712158203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Protein-protein interaction took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mi took 2.622220277786255s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0005323886871337891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.2768683433532715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.020040273666381836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0006971359252929688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0007305145263671875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-miro took 2.6416845321655273s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Measurement Method Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.00054168701171875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.2584223747253418s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.020115375518798828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Measurement Method Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.0007836818695068359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.00014162063598632812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Measurement Method Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mmo took 2.6960482597351074s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MGED Ontology took 5.459785461425781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MGED Ontology took 0.0005576610565185547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MGED Ontology took 0.25133419036865234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MGED Ontology took 0.02004694938659668s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MGED Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MGED Ontology took 0.0007443428039550781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MGED Ontology took 0.00038170814514160156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MGED Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mo took 2.605433702468872s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Protein modification took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Protein modification took 0.0004901885986328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Protein modification took 0.2643401622772217s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Protein modification took 0.0200042724609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Protein modification took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Protein modification took 0.0007331371307373047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Protein modification took 0.0002205371856689453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Protein modification took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mod took 2.6241989135742188s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mammalian phenotype took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0005803108215332031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mammalian phenotype took 0.2660646438598633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mammalian phenotype took 0.020277976989746094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mammalian phenotype took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0007691383361816406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0006539821624755859s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mammalian phenotype took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mp took 2.612104654312134s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse pathology took 5.5789947509765625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse pathology took 0.0005438327789306641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse pathology took 0.29013586044311523s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse pathology took 0.020062923431396484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse pathology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse pathology took 0.0007281303405761719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse pathology took 0.00047135353088378906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse pathology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mpath took 2.650556802749634s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mass spectrometry took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mass spectrometry took 0.00046062469482421875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mass spectrometry took 0.25391435623168945s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mass spectrometry took 0.02005171775817871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mass spectrometry took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mass spectrometry took 0.00069427490234375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mass spectrometry took 0.00034999847412109375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mass spectrometry took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ms took 2.6127943992614746s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Medical Subject Headings took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0005054473876953125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Medical Subject Headings took 0.3018345832824707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Medical Subject Headings took 0.020185470581054688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Medical Subject Headings took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0007252693176269531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0018537044525146484s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Medical Subject Headings took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-msh took 3.055636167526245s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 7.152557373046875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.0005006790161132812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.26999354362487793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.020107030868530273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.0007410049438476562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.00018453598022460938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mthch took 2.6032004356384277s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Natural Products Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Natural Products Ontology took 0.00040221214294433594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Natural Products Ontology took 0.2878737449645996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Natural Products Ontology took 0.020140647888183594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Natural Products Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0007753372192382812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Natural Products Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-natpro took 2.6702980995178223s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NCBI organismal classification took 5.245208740234375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NCBI organismal classification took 0.0006346702575683594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NCBI organismal classification took 0.2630598545074463s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NCBI organismal classification took 0.02012491226196289s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NCBI organismal classification took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NCBI organismal classification took 0.0007417201995849609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NCBI organismal classification took 0.000835418701171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NCBI organismal classification took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ncbitaxon took 2.595461130142212s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NCI Thesaurus took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NCI Thesaurus took 0.0004925727844238281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NCI Thesaurus took 0.36188411712646484s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NCI Thesaurus took 0.020464181900024414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NCI Thesaurus took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NCI Thesaurus took 0.0008640289306640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NCI Thesaurus took 0.002086162567138672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NCI Thesaurus took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ncit took 3.1938886642456055s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for National Drug Data File took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for National Drug Data File took 0.0002830028533935547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for National Drug Data File took 0.26087141036987305s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for National Drug Data File took 0.02020549774169922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for National Drug Data File took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for National Drug Data File took 0.0007469654083251953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for National Drug Data File took 0.0006337165832519531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for National Drug Data File took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nddf took 2.5352799892425537s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for National Drug File took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for National Drug File took 0.00048279762268066406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for National Drug File took 0.2583599090576172s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for National Drug File took 0.02024102210998535s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for National Drug File took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for National Drug File took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for National Drug File took 0.0012128353118896484s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for National Drug File took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ndfrt took 2.5860626697540283s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.0005364418029785156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.27695131301879883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.020602941513061523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.0007054805755615234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.0011317729949951172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nemo_x1 took 2.61969256401062s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0006885528564453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.25826334953308105s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.020139455795288086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0006976127624511719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0006458759307861328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-neomark took 2.6789889335632324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.00046133995056152344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.26505613327026367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.020197391510009766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.0007143020629882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.00012373924255371094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-neomarkontology took 2.6249747276306152s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIFSTD took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIFSTD took 0.0005021095275878906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIFSTD took 0.31497740745544434s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIFSTD took 0.02020096778869629s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIFSTD took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIFSTD took 0.0007719993591308594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIFSTD took 0.0019578933715820312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIFSTD took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif took 3.062891960144043s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIF Cell took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIF Cell took 0.0005266666412353516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIF Cell took 0.25359296798706055s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIF Cell took 0.020175695419311523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIF Cell took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIF Cell took 0.0007050037384033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIF Cell took 0.0013382434844970703s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIF Cell took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif_cell took 2.7220871448516846s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIF Dysfunction took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIF Dysfunction took 0.00024700164794921875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIF Dysfunction took 0.27459144592285156s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIF Dysfunction took 0.0200955867767334s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIF Dysfunction took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIF Dysfunction took 0.0007169246673583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIF Dysfunction took 0.0014281272888183594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIF Dysfunction took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif_dysfunction took 2.5950467586517334s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0005252361297607422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.2678959369659424s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.020114660263061523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0007100105285644531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0005576610565185547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nigo took 2.5556399822235107s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0005505084991455078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.2678549289703369s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.020403385162353516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.000705718994140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0005857944488525391s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nmr took 2.6905906200408936s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 6.842613220214844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.0005087852478027344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.2670631408691406s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.020107746124267578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.0007085800170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.000110626220703125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nonrctontology took 2.6956536769866943s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NanoParticle Ontology took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.0005049705505371094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.2852907180786133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.02015209197998047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NanoParticle Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.0007114410400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.001176595687866211s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NanoParticle Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-npo took 2.7225091457366943s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0005002021789550781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.26285529136657715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0200350284576416s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0008809566497802734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0008423328399658203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oae took 2.645313262939453s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0005767345428466797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.27285146713256836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.020325899124145508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0007121562957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0014758110046386719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-obi took 2.6992366313934326s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for OBOE took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for OBOE took 0.0006022453308105469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for OBOE took 0.26131415367126465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for OBOE took 0.025033235549926758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for OBOE took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for OBOE took 0.0008866786956787109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for OBOE took 0.00014638900756835938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for OBOE took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oboe took 2.5651092529296875s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for OBOE SBC took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for OBOE SBC took 0.0005691051483154297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for OBOE SBC took 0.24828267097473145s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for OBOE SBC took 0.02048206329345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for OBOE SBC took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for OBOE SBC took 0.0007586479187011719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for OBOE SBC took 0.0008380413055419922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for OBOE SBC took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oboe-sbc took 2.607109546661377s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0005509853363037109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.25105714797973633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.02006077766418457s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0007395744323730469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0005857944488525391s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ocre took 2.665929079055786s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0005409717559814453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.27506589889526367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.020243406295776367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0007481575012207031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0008475780487060547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-odgi took 2.687420129776001s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 5.9604644775390625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0005269050598144531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.2533600330352783s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.02089977264404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0007469654083251953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0009045600891113281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogi took 2.6071372032165527s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.0002560615539550781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.2966616153717041s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.0200197696685791s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.0002887248992919922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogmd took 2.6203367710113525s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for General Medical Science took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0004868507385253906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.27812957763671875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.019977092742919922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for General Medical Science took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0007109642028808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0006811618804931641s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for General Medical Science took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogms took 2.598036766052246s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0003466606140136719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.24826574325561523s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.020104646682739258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0007719993591308594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0011267662048339844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omim took 2.5724029541015625s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.0002224445343017578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.27138710021972656s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.01988959312438965s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.0007128715515136719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.0004076957702636719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omit took 2.5635910034179688s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 5.626678466796875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.0002682209014892578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.2693464756011963s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.020108938217163086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.0007066726684570312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.0006043910980224609s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omrse took 2.3581056594848633s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Data Mining took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.0002617835998535156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.2734682559967041s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.01990985870361328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Data Mining took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.0007014274597167969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.0007998943328857422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Data Mining took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontodm took 2.6058032512664795s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.0005021095275878906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.26947021484375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.020049095153808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.0007078647613525391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.00024366378784179688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontodt took 2.55090594291687s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0004906654357910156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.28005528450012207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.020371675491333008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0007805824279785156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0006163120269775391s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontoorpha took 2.594698905944824s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0005214214324951172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.26083803176879883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.020427703857421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0007014274597167969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0009198188781738281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-opl took 2.655444622039795s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Phenotypic quality took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Phenotypic quality took 0.0005652904510498047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Phenotypic quality took 0.24623513221740723s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Phenotypic quality took 0.02024245262145996s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Phenotypic quality took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Phenotypic quality took 0.0007109642028808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Phenotypic quality took 0.0008952617645263672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Phenotypic quality took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pato took 2.6253387928009033s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physician Data Query took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physician Data Query took 0.0004856586456298828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physician Data Query took 0.2737891674041748s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physician Data Query took 0.020218372344970703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physician Data Query took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physician Data Query took 0.0008738040924072266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physician Data Query took 0.0009398460388183594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physician Data Query took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pdq took 2.6412200927734375s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Pediatric Terminology took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0003612041473388672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Pediatric Terminology took 0.2836267948150635s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Pediatric Terminology took 0.02048349380493164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Pediatric Terminology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0007278919219970703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0008168220520019531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Pediatric Terminology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pedterm took 2.6912782192230225s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.0004634857177734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.2597377300262451s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.02040266990661621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.0007200241088867188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.00020241737365722656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-peo took 2.640852451324463s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PHARE took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PHARE took 0.0004622936248779297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PHARE took 0.2736837863922119s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PHARE took 0.02031564712524414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PHARE took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PHARE took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PHARE took 0.0006613731384277344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PHARE took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-phare took 2.5346405506134033s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PKO_Re took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PKO_Re took 0.0005588531494140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PKO_Re took 0.2510547637939453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PKO_Re took 0.02010512351989746s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PKO_Re took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PKO_Re took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PKO_Re took 0.00017142295837402344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PKO_Re took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pko took 2.6103923320770264s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PMA 2010 took 7.557868957519531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PMA 2010 took 0.0005710124969482422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PMA 2010 took 0.28156566619873047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PMA 2010 took 0.020105600357055664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PMA 2010 took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PMA 2010 took 0.0006985664367675781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PMA 2010 took 0.0008983612060546875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PMA 2010 took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pma took 2.6884310245513916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 5.53131103515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.0005016326904296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.24796533584594727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.020136117935180664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.0007348060607910156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.00016689300537109375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pmr took 2.6101553440093994s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Anatomy took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Anatomy took 0.0005245208740234375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Anatomy took 0.26633262634277344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Anatomy took 0.02034449577331543s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Anatomy took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Anatomy took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Anatomy took 0.0004248619079589844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po took 2.6581194400787354s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.0004951953887939453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.2601053714752197s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.02023625373840332s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.0007078647613525391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 7.033348083496094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po_x1 took 2.549321413040161s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Ontology took 5.6743621826171875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Ontology took 0.0005600452423095703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Ontology took 0.278597354888916s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Ontology took 0.020028352737426758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Ontology took 0.0007374286651611328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Ontology took 0.0004374980926513672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po_x2 took 2.640714406967163s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0005257129669189453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.27616071701049805s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.02025914192199707s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0006961822509765625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0006566047668457031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pr took 2.568729877471924s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Proteomics data and process provenance took 4.887580871582031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.0004787445068359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.2752225399017334s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.02029275894165039s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Proteomics data and process provenance took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.0006923675537109375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.00025916099548339844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Proteomics data and process provenance took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-propreo took 2.5974233150482178s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Pathway ontology took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Pathway ontology took 0.0005006790161132812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Pathway ontology took 0.2616393566131592s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Pathway ontology took 0.0202481746673584s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Pathway ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Pathway ontology took 0.0007224082946777344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Pathway ontology took 0.00012230873107910156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Pathway ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pw took 2.6393840312957764s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 5.173683166503906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.0005786418914794922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.263289213180542s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.020096778869628906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.0007474422454833984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-qibo took 2.6485097408294678s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.0003669261932373047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.3157835006713867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.020216941833496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.0007333755493164062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.00179290771484375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rcd took 2.9564929008483887s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.00025534629821777344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.3014857769012451s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.020466089248657227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.0007271766662597656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.00014090538024902344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rctontology took 2.565699577331543s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.0002930164337158203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.2632782459259033s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.020763874053955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.0008232593536376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 9.894371032714844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-repo took 2.572026252746582s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physico-chemical process took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physico-chemical process took 0.00046753883361816406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physico-chemical process took 0.2782599925994873s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physico-chemical process took 0.020040035247802734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physico-chemical process took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physico-chemical process took 0.0007021427154541016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physico-chemical process took 0.0001876354217529297s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physico-chemical process took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rex took 2.6141738891601562s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RadLex took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RadLex took 0.00048422813415527344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RadLex took 0.2548699378967285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RadLex took 0.020610809326171875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RadLex took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RadLex took 0.0007226467132568359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RadLex took 0.0014967918395996094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RadLex took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rid took 2.641733407974243s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RNA ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RNA ontology took 0.0004782676696777344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RNA ontology took 0.26426100730895996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RNA ontology took 0.02013874053955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RNA ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RNA ontology took 0.0006973743438720703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RNA ontology took 0.0005488395690917969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RNA ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rnao took 2.6674747467041016s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Role Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Role Ontology took 0.0005269050598144531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Role Ontology took 0.2553730010986328s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Role Ontology took 0.0207216739654541s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Role Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Role Ontology took 0.0007047653198242188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Role Ontology took 0.0001876354217529297s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Role Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-roleo took 2.5912084579467773s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Rat Strain Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.0005419254302978516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.26804685592651367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.020398616790771484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Rat Strain Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.0007164478302001953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.0001800060272216797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Rat Strain Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rs took 2.6572043895721436s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RxNORM took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RxNORM took 0.0004832744598388672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RxNORM took 0.2725358009338379s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RxNORM took 0.02012777328491211s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RxNORM took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RxNORM took 0.0006909370422363281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RxNORM took 0.0005958080291748047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RxNORM took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rxnorm took 2.5986363887786865s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0011556148529052734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.27007293701171875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.02009296417236328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0007331371307373047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0010297298431396484s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sao took 2.6150732040405273s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Systems Biology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Systems Biology took 0.0005397796630859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Systems Biology took 0.26218533515930176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Systems Biology took 0.020215511322021484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Systems Biology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Systems Biology took 0.0007851123809814453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Systems Biology took 0.0004897117614746094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Systems Biology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sbo took 2.6855523586273193s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 5.435943603515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.0002551078796386719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.27039647102355957s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.02036428451538086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.0006968975067138672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.00010442733764648438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sbro took 2.5302722454071045s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sleep Domain Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.00045037269592285156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.27590250968933105s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.020313024520874023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sleep Domain Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.0007116794586181641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.0013127326965332031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sleep Domain Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sdo took 2.529646396636963s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sample processing and separation techniques took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.0004963874816894531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.26256322860717773s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.02047133445739746s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sample processing and separation techniques took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.0007822513580322266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.0003762245178222656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sample processing and separation techniques took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sep took 2.6563804149627686s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Student Health Record took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Student Health Record took 0.0004668235778808594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Student Health Record took 0.26087236404418945s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Student Health Record took 0.020184993743896484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Student Health Record took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Student Health Record took 0.0007126331329345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Student Health Record took 0.0004596710205078125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Student Health Record took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-shr took 2.634077548980713s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0006175041198730469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.28791308403015137s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.020252466201782227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0007207393646240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.001207113265991211s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sio took 3.3507184982299805s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Situation-Based Access Control took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.0004856586456298828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.2765786647796631s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.020246028900146484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Situation-Based Access Control took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.0007026195526123047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.0002002716064453125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Situation-Based Access Control took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sitbac took 2.5878987312316895s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.0005109310150146484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.3114011287689209s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.02074575424194336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.0007512569427490234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.0019981861114501953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-snomedct took 3.1350197792053223s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SNP-Ontology took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SNP-Ontology took 0.0004761219024658203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SNP-Ontology took 0.28693079948425293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SNP-Ontology took 0.020329713821411133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SNP-Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SNP-Ontology took 0.0007710456848144531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SNP-Ontology took 0.0006697177886962891s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SNP-Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-snpo took 2.6333060264587402s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sequence types and features took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sequence types and features took 0.0005052089691162109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sequence types and features took 0.2754647731781006s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sequence types and features took 0.02028965950012207s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sequence types and features took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sequence types and features took 0.0007348060607910156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sequence types and features took 0.0006189346313476562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sequence types and features took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-so_x1 took 2.6705052852630615s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0005710124969482422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.30105042457580566s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.020510196685791016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0015947818756103516s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sopharm took 2.998215436935425s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SoyOntology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SoyOntology took 0.0002741813659667969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SoyOntology took 0.2739682197570801s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SoyOntology took 0.02026224136352539s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SoyOntology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SoyOntology took 0.0007097721099853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SoyOntology took 0.00012636184692382812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SoyOntology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-soy took 2.644505500793457s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Spider Ontology took 5.125999450683594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Spider Ontology took 0.0004940032958984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Spider Ontology took 0.2734341621398926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Spider Ontology took 0.020314931869506836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Spider Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Spider Ontology took 0.0007085800170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Spider Ontology took 0.0003142356872558594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Spider Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-spd took 2.6194539070129395s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.0005519390106201172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.27278804779052734s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.020838499069213867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.0008730888366699219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.00033783912658691406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-spto took 2.7074387073516846s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.0005171298980712891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.25357651710510254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.02036881446838379s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.0007138252258300781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.00045013427734375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sso took 2.643601655960083s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Software Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Software Ontology took 0.00047206878662109375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Software Ontology took 0.2906181812286377s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Software Ontology took 0.020601511001586914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Software Ontology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Software Ontology took 0.0008053779602050781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Software Ontology took 0.0004696846008300781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Software Ontology took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-swo took 2.605459213256836s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Tick gross anatomy took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Tick gross anatomy took 0.00026607513427734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Tick gross anatomy took 0.2501955032348633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Tick gross anatomy took 0.020099163055419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Tick gross anatomy took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Tick gross anatomy took 0.0006928443908691406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Tick gross anatomy took 0.00023412704467773438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Tick gross anatomy took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tads took 2.820807456970215s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 5.936622619628906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.00046944618225097656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.2708323001861572s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.020466089248657227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.0007150173187255859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.0009243488311767578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tao took 2.580883026123047s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 5.3882598876953125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.0005221366882324219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.286909818649292s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.020907163619995117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.00075531005859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.00011229515075683594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-taxrank took 2.697777032852173s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.0004832744598388672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.26955318450927734s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.020041942596435547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.0007305145263671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 7.486343383789062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-teddy took 2.576495409011841s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Time Event Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Time Event Ontology took 0.0004999637603759766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Time Event Ontology took 0.252591609954834s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Time Event Ontology took 0.02039480209350586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Time Event Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Time Event Ontology took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Time Event Ontology took 0.0008244514465332031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Time Event Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-teo took 2.6003897190093994s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mosquito gross anatomy took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0002522468566894531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.24936389923095703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.020318031311035156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mosquito gross anatomy took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0007097721099853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0004017353057861328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mosquito gross anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tgma took 2.5626220703125s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for thesaurus took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for thesaurus took 0.0006973743438720703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for thesaurus took 0.2540547847747803s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for thesaurus took 0.02244114875793457s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for thesaurus took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for thesaurus took 0.0012302398681640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for thesaurus took 9.894371032714844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for thesaurus took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-thesaurus took 2.611111640930176s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.0005319118499755859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.26802968978881836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.020586013793945312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.0007109642028808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.0003612041473388672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tm-signs-and-sympts took 2.6023125648498535s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Translational Medicine Ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0005676746368408203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.2522397041320801s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.02061176300048828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Translational Medicine Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0007312297821044922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0008389949798583984s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Translational Medicine Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tmo took 2.665431022644043s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Trait Ontology took 4.744529724121094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.0004851818084716797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.26982736587524414s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.02046942710876465s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Trait Ontology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.0007596015930175781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.00016045570373535156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Trait Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-to took 2.6094493865966797s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for TOK_Ontology took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for TOK_Ontology took 0.00052642822265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for TOK_Ontology took 0.2966129779815674s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for TOK_Ontology took 0.020370006561279297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for TOK_Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for TOK_Ontology took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for TOK_Ontology took 0.00017976760864257812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for TOK_Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tok took 2.668459177017212s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Teleost taxonomy took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Teleost taxonomy took 0.00047326087951660156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Teleost taxonomy took 0.2651960849761963s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Teleost taxonomy took 0.02048516273498535s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Teleost taxonomy took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Teleost taxonomy took 0.000728607177734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Teleost taxonomy took 0.00019979476928710938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Teleost taxonomy took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tto took 2.6432247161865234s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Uber anatomy ontology took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.0005166530609130859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.2720623016357422s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.020475149154663086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Uber anatomy ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.0007135868072509766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.001028299331665039s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Uber anatomy ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-uberon took 2.6761226654052734s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Units Ontology took 5.793571472167969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Units Ontology took 0.0004696846008300781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Units Ontology took 0.27106237411499023s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Units Ontology took 0.020389795303344727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Units Ontology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Units Ontology took 0.0007176399230957031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Units Ontology took 0.0002238750457763672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Units Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-unitsontology took 2.607301712036133s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Units of measurement took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Units of measurement took 0.0005424022674560547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Units of measurement took 0.25974011421203613s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Units of measurement took 0.020360231399536133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Units of measurement took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Units of measurement took 0.0007042884826660156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Units of measurement took 0.00028061866760253906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Units of measurement took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-uo took 2.623739242553711s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for VANDF took 7.128715515136719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for VANDF took 0.0005173683166503906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for VANDF took 0.2769317626953125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for VANDF took 0.02023601531982422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for VANDF took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for VANDF took 0.0007274150848388672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for VANDF took 0.0007555484771728516s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for VANDF took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vandf took 2.644731283187866s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.0005092620849609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.273745059967041s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.020361900329589844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.0007083415985107422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.0004382133483886719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vao took 2.6262238025665283s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0004987716674804688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.28556346893310547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.020046710968017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0007016658782958984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.000621795654296875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vhog took 2.677924394607544s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for VIVO took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for VIVO took 0.0005025863647460938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for VIVO took 0.24559664726257324s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for VIVO took 0.020311355590820312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for VIVO took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for VIVO took 0.0006957054138183594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for VIVO took 0.0003490447998046875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for VIVO took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vivo took 2.5518908500671387s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vaccine Ontology took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0005109310150146484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vaccine Ontology took 0.24568629264831543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vaccine Ontology took 0.020101070404052734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vaccine Ontology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0006999969482421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0012645721435546875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vaccine Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vo took 2.64249324798584s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.0005145072937011719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.2678091526031494s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.02020573616027832s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.0007045269012451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.00020432472229003906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vt took 2.63800048828125s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans gross anatomy took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0004940032958984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.29587364196777344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.020194053649902344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans gross anatomy took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0007030963897705078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0004923343658447266s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans gross anatomy took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbbt took 2.6124215126037598s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans development took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans development took 0.0004775524139404297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans development took 0.2614421844482422s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans development took 0.02021956443786621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans development took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans development took 0.0007126331329345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans development took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans development took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbls took 2.6913506984710693s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans phenotype took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans phenotype took 0.0004527568817138672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans phenotype took 0.2780628204345703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans phenotype took 0.020194053649902344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans phenotype took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans phenotype took 0.0008242130279541016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans phenotype took 9.202957153320312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans phenotype took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbphenotype took 2.5721547603607178s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0005667209625244141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.26851701736450195s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.020333290100097656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0007390975952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0005822181701660156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-who took 2.5737414360046387s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Xenopus anatomy and development took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0004737377166748047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.26325368881225586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.020115375518798828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Xenopus anatomy and development took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0007152557373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0006856918334960938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Xenopus anatomy and development took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-xao took 2.5966756343841553s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.0005307197570800781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.2776038646697998s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.020331382751464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.000736236572265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.00024366378784179688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-xco took 2.5897700786590576s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Yeast phenotypes took 5.4836273193359375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Yeast phenotypes took 0.0005090236663818359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Yeast phenotypes took 0.28873634338378906s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Yeast phenotypes took 0.02014899253845215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Yeast phenotypes took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Yeast phenotypes took 0.0007092952728271484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Yeast phenotypes took 0.00026345252990722656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Yeast phenotypes took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ypo took 2.7080254554748535s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 5.364418029785156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0004901885986328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.2708561420440674s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.020300865173339844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0007560253143310547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0007801055908203125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-zfa took 2.6046438217163086s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.0006017684936523438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.27624988555908203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.02008533477783203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.0006954669952392578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bioportal_link took 3.3989834785461426s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioSamples RDF took 0.6716532707214355s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioSamples RDF took 0.000446319580078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioSamples RDF took 0.2642862796783447s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioSamples RDF took 0.02087569236755371s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioSamples RDF took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioSamples RDF took 0.0007164478302001953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioSamples RDF took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioSamples RDF took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biosamples-rdf took 3.754143476486206s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.15265822410583496s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.0004489421844482422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.27258896827697754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.020221948623657227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.0007109642028808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.00011563301086425781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bis-linked-data took 2.5658609867095947s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bitzi took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bitzi took 0.00025153160095214844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bitzi took 0.25798964500427246s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bitzi took 0.020189762115478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bitzi took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bitzi took 0.0007321834564208984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bitzi took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bitzi took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bitzi took 2.964794874191284s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BizkaiSense took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BizkaiSense took 0.00025010108947753906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BizkaiSense took 0.2748293876647949s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BizkaiSense took 0.02035665512084961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BizkaiSense took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BizkaiSense took 0.0007317066192626953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BizkaiSense took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BizkaiSense took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bizkaisense took 2.881871461868286s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for blabla.itemlist took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for blabla.itemlist took 0.0002562999725341797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for blabla.itemlist took 0.2607765197753906s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for blabla.itemlist took 0.02017807960510254s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for blabla.itemlist took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for blabla.itemlist took 0.00070953369140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for blabla.itemlist took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for blabla.itemlist took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for blabla-itemlist took 2.9148175716400146s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for blabla.itemlist took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for blabla.itemlist took 0.00026154518127441406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for blabla.itemlist took 0.2856259346008301s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for blabla.itemlist took 0.020528316497802734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for blabla.itemlist took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for blabla.itemlist took 0.0007612705230712891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for blabla.itemlist took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for blabla.itemlist took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for blabla_itemlist took 2.9599177837371826s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.0006642341613769531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.26370668411254883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.020682334899902344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.000705718994140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bll-thesaurus took 3.638110637664795s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.48735833168029785s
Availability | VoID file availability check for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.0005757808685302734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.2631852626800537s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.029324769973754883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.0009353160858154297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 7.486343383789062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bluk-bnb took 11.679355144500732s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.6113715171813965s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.0006611347198486328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.28152036666870117s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.02048182487487793s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.0007033348083496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Thesaurus BNCF took 6.866455078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Thesaurus BNCF took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bncf-ns took 14.115500926971436s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.4401521682739258s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.0006160736083984375s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.679612398147583s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.48502516746521s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 4.316389799118042s
Interoperability | New terms check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 3.838381767272949s
Versatility | Languages check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 60.284663677215576s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.7328174114227295s
Security | Check HTTPS for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.2534339427947998s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.34596943855285645s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.5553367137908936s
Availability | RDF dump link check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.47544312477111816s
License | MR license check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.658625602722168s
License | HR license check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 60.276971101760864s
Amount of data | Number of property check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.29444193840026855s
Understandability | Number of label check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.9625473022460938s
Understandability | URI regex check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.5387148857116699s
Understandability | Vocabs check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.39225077629089355s
Verifiability | Authors check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.42148900032043457s
Verifiability | Publishers check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.2989959716796875s
Performance | Throughput check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 11.288511037826538s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.00010609626770019531s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.33621883392333984s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.34391069412231445s
Interlinking | skos check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3060874938964844s
Interlinking | skos check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.2184603214263916s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.42776989936828613s
Currency | Creation date check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.6567738056182861s
Currency | Modification date check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.2986173629760742s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 17.770395040512085s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.2797536849975586s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.2839012145996094s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.2716505527496338s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.7418918609619141s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.024137496948242188s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.027204036712646484s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.30771756172180176s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 13.39005446434021s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.38919949531555176s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.9249649047851562s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.2826900482177734s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 14.45331335067749s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.031903743743896484s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3247549533843994s
Security | Sign check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.31333041191101074s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 6.414366960525513s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.37126588821411133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.020030498504638672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.0007052421569824219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 6.341934204101562e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bpr took 375.12219285964966s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brazilian Politicians took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brazilian Politicians took 0.0005090236663818359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brazilian Politicians took 0.33042454719543457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brazilian Politicians took 0.01949334144592285s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brazilian Politicians took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brazilian Politicians took 0.0006897449493408203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brazilian Politicians took 6.246566772460938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brazilian Politicians took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for brazilian-politicians took 4.554169416427612s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BrazilianCities took 4.935264587402344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BrazilianCities took 0.0003211498260498047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BrazilianCities took 0.31915879249572754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BrazilianCities took 0.02053356170654297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BrazilianCities took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BrazilianCities took 0.0007076263427734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BrazilianCities took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BrazilianCities took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for braziliancities took 3.796342372894287s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bricklink took 1.831164836883545s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bricklink took 0.0006628036499023438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bricklink took 0.26207852363586426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bricklink took 0.020112276077270508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bricklink took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bricklink took 0.0006995201110839844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bricklink took 6.556510925292969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bricklink took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bricklink took 10.932488918304443s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for British Museum Collection took 30.341906785964966s
Availability | VoID file availability check for British Museum Collection took 0.0005500316619873047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for British Museum Collection took 0.25359487533569336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for British Museum Collection took 0.020249605178833008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for British Museum Collection took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for British Museum Collection took 0.0007333755493164062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for British Museum Collection took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for British Museum Collection took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for british-museum-collection took 73.37045526504517s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 5.5789947509765625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.0004951953887939453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.2604539394378662s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.02041482925415039s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.0007023811340332031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for brown-corpus-in-rdf-nif took 3.336905002593994s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for French Plant Health Bulletins took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.00025653839111328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.7090723514556885s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.020500659942626953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for French Plant Health Bulletins took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.0007281303405761719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for French Plant Health Bulletins took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for French Plant Health Bulletins took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bsv took 4.250237464904785s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 3.1108765602111816s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.0006949901580810547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.27321410179138184s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.020501136779785156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 1.6689300537109375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.0007071495056152344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bulgarian_admissions_to_correctional_facilities took 6.846011638641357s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bund Offener Haushalt took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.0002415180206298828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.2579624652862549s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.0200960636138916s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bund Offener Haushalt took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.0006911754608154297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bund Offener Haushalt took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bund Offener Haushalt took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bund-offener-haushalt took 2.8255107402801514s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 7.867813110351562e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.00027060508728027344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.2629120349884033s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.02048778533935547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.0007171630859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bundestagnebeneinkuenfte took 3.3687169551849365s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for business.data.gov.uk took 0.3740193843841553s
Availability | VoID file availability check for business.data.gov.uk took 0.00045228004455566406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for business.data.gov.uk took 0.2698936462402344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for business.data.gov.uk took 0.020275115966796875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for business.data.gov.uk took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for business.data.gov.uk took 0.0007233619689941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for business.data.gov.uk took 4.982948303222656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for business.data.gov.uk took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for business-data-gov-uk took 2.928713321685791s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2863318920135498s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.0008184909820556641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.26252174377441406s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.02040576934814453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.0007157325744628906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for BVMC took 3.7365119457244873s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.0002636909484863281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.28296351432800293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.02076101303100586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cabbage took 2.9160068035125732s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for cablegate took 1.601379156112671s
Availability | VoID file availability check for cablegate took 0.0006198883056640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for cablegate took 0.2573730945587158s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for cablegate took 0.020314931869506836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for cablegate took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for cablegate took 0.0008373260498046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for cablegate took 7.05718994140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for cablegate took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cablegate took 7.208174705505371s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Calames took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Calames took 0.0006875991821289062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Calames took 0.2528669834136963s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Calames took 0.020755767822265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Calames took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Calames took 0.0007107257843017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Calames took 3.8623809814453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Calames took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for calames took 4.344848155975342s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.44152021408081055s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.00028014183044433594s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for CaLiGraph took 1.1529719829559326s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for CaLiGraph took 1.171945571899414s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for CaLiGraph took 12.40615439414978s
Interoperability | New terms check for CaLiGraph took 1.9251892566680908s
Versatility | Languages check for CaLiGraph took 60.30827522277832s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for CaLiGraph took 0.25725722312927246s
Security | Check HTTPS for CaLiGraph took 0.14858150482177734s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for CaLiGraph took 0.2964649200439453s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for CaLiGraph took 0.32980895042419434s
Availability | RDF dump link check for CaLiGraph took 0.26169514656066895s
License | MR license check for CaLiGraph took 0.3659818172454834s
License | HR license check for CaLiGraph took 60.285574197769165s
Amount of data | Number of property check for CaLiGraph took 0.28751325607299805s
Understandability | Number of label check for CaLiGraph took 3.1262853145599365s
Understandability | URI regex check for CaLiGraph took 0.5473804473876953s
Understandability | Vocabs check for CaLiGraph took 0.2665443420410156s
Verifiability | Authors check for CaLiGraph took 0.2575998306274414s
Verifiability | Publishers check for CaLiGraph took 0.2653665542602539s
Performance | Throughput check for CaLiGraph took 11.4445641040802s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for CaLiGraph took 0.01690983772277832s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for CaLiGraph took 0.2807905673980713s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for CaLiGraph took 0.6586952209472656s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.28278326988220215s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.2201228141784668s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for CaLiGraph took 0.30370593070983887s
Currency | Creation date check for CaLiGraph took 0.5337991714477539s
Currency | Modification date check for CaLiGraph took 0.5591542720794678s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for CaLiGraph took 62.39946889877319s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for CaLiGraph took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for CaLiGraph took 0.24691510200500488s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 0.26838135719299316s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 0.2627103328704834s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for CaLiGraph took 0.5578188896179199s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for CaLiGraph took 0.026407241821289062s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for CaLiGraph took 0.02843022346496582s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for CaLiGraph took 0.2555394172668457s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for CaLiGraph took 60.85713768005371s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for CaLiGraph took 0.5059552192687988s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for CaLiGraph took 1.923971176147461s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for CaLiGraph took 1.2635958194732666s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for CaLiGraph took 61.545114517211914s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.03294515609741211s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.43967556953430176s
Security | Sign check for CaLiGraph took 0.2779369354248047s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for CaLiGraph took 6.129647970199585s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CaLiGraph took 1.2294285297393799s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CaLiGraph took 0.020404338836669922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CaLiGraph took 2.288818359375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CaLiGraph took 0.0008063316345214844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CaLiGraph took 4.839897155761719e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for CaLiGraph took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CaLiGraph took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CaLiGraph took 1444.32746219635s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.2821934223175049s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.0007565021514892578s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for CaLiGraph took 1.5375299453735352s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for CaLiGraph took 1.1947102546691895s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for CaLiGraph took 12.12753415107727s
Interoperability | New terms check for CaLiGraph took 1.9194512367248535s
Versatility | Languages check for CaLiGraph took 60.267297983169556s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for CaLiGraph took 0.2775585651397705s
Security | Check HTTPS for CaLiGraph took 0.12880373001098633s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for CaLiGraph took 0.2634611129760742s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for CaLiGraph took 0.2657177448272705s
Availability | RDF dump link check for CaLiGraph took 0.26448535919189453s
License | MR license check for CaLiGraph took 0.2719306945800781s
License | HR license check for CaLiGraph took 60.30484676361084s
Amount of data | Number of property check for CaLiGraph took 0.2649390697479248s
Understandability | Number of label check for CaLiGraph took 3.073975086212158s
Understandability | URI regex check for CaLiGraph took 0.5041995048522949s
Understandability | Vocabs check for CaLiGraph took 0.2700672149658203s
Verifiability | Authors check for CaLiGraph took 0.25589919090270996s
Verifiability | Publishers check for CaLiGraph took 0.2693641185760498s
Performance | Throughput check for CaLiGraph took 11.37520718574524s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for CaLiGraph took 0.012504100799560547s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for CaLiGraph took 0.2798304557800293s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for CaLiGraph took 0.6788680553436279s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.29942774772644043s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.22182512283325195s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for CaLiGraph took 0.26369476318359375s
Currency | Creation date check for CaLiGraph took 0.5207068920135498s
Currency | Modification date check for CaLiGraph took 0.5561690330505371s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for CaLiGraph took 62.40740251541138s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for CaLiGraph took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for CaLiGraph took 0.2846951484680176s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 0.25354528427124023s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 0.27377915382385254s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for CaLiGraph took 0.6071057319641113s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for CaLiGraph took 0.02633523941040039s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for CaLiGraph took 0.026264429092407227s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for CaLiGraph took 0.26285505294799805s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for CaLiGraph took 60.879897356033325s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for CaLiGraph took 0.49614644050598145s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for CaLiGraph took 1.9866478443145752s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for CaLiGraph took 1.2594058513641357s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for CaLiGraph took 61.630759954452515s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.02963423728942871s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.554931640625s
Security | Sign check for CaLiGraph took 0.25658559799194336s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for CaLiGraph took 6.0726540088653564s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CaLiGraph took 1.0430631637573242s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CaLiGraph took 0.020547866821289062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CaLiGraph took 1.71661376953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CaLiGraph took 0.0007843971252441406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CaLiGraph took 7.224082946777344e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for CaLiGraph took 2.1457672119140625e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CaLiGraph took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for caligraph took 1442.6942684650421s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for can-link took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for can-link took 0.00027632713317871094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for can-link took 0.7113709449768066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for can-link took 0.020064353942871094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for can-link took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for can-link took 0.0007467269897460938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for can-link took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for can-link took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for can-link took 6.554749965667725s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.07832694053649902s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.0004887580871582031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.7205350399017334s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.020328283309936523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cap-italy-rdf took 4.3717873096466064s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for person took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for person took 0.0002639293670654297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for person took 0.25859498977661133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for person took 0.020503759384155273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for person took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for person took 0.0007340908050537109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for person took 3.170967102050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for person took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for card took 3.2129762172698975s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0006330013275146484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.2908785343170166s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.020244836807250977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0007009506225585938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for catalan-eurowordnet-lemon-lexicon-3-0 took 4.34475040435791s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.00025916099548339844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.7110109329223633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.020185470581054688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.0007061958312988281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for catalogus-professorum-lipsiensis took 3.38513445854187s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.9009082317352295s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.000244140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.268343448638916s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.020203113555908203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.0007274150848388672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Catch_Record_(2014-_2019) took 3.773906946182251s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.0006344318389892578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.28171443939208984s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.02015852928161621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.00010156631469726562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ce4r took 4.819021463394165s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3723764419555664s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.0003490447998046875s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.0319445133209229s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.800940990447998s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.36427760124206543s
Interoperability | New terms check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.624462366104126s
Versatility | Languages check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 58.15394830703735s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.17888855934143066s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.24450969696044922s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.14651775360107422s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.17171931266784668s
License | MR license check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.2852163314819336s
License | HR license check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.36405229568481445s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.16493010520935059s
Understandability | Number of label check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3853583335876465s
Understandability | URI regex check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.30080461502075195s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.17026448249816895s
Verifiability | Authors check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.25220298767089844s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.21016407012939453s
Performance | Throughput check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 10.735963582992554s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.00010967254638671875s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.22447967529296875s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.13928675651550293s
Interlinking | skos check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.9241290092468262s
Interlinking | skos check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.14473819732666016s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.39987826347351074s
Currency | Creation date check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.6477451324462891s
Currency | Modification date check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3551449775695801s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 2.1274588108062744s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.17340898513793945s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.22083091735839844s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.2607846260070801s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.5268018245697021s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.027477025985717773s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.027842283248901367s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.32300376892089844s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.2365937232971191s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.8748812675476074s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 2.198265314102173s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.5010313987731934s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.03300929069519043s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.2288527488708496s
Security | Sign check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.15473628044128418s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 724.8318841457367s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.432183027267456s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.020638704299926758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.0007143020629882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ceo took 851.4992444515228s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Charging Stations took 8.702278137207031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Charging Stations took 0.0002772808074951172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Charging Stations took 0.2552361488342285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Charging Stations took 0.020402193069458008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Charging Stations took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Charging Stations took 0.0006771087646484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Charging Stations took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Charging Stations took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for charging-stations took 6.044329643249512s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chat Game corpus took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chat Game corpus took 0.0006492137908935547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chat Game corpus took 0.7170531749725342s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chat Game corpus took 0.019861459732055664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chat Game corpus took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chat Game corpus took 0.0007119178771972656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chat Game corpus took 3.361701965332031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chat Game corpus took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chat-game-corpus took 14.684372901916504s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.0002694129943847656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.7229211330413818s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.020268678665161133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.0006878376007080078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 3.218650817871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chebi took 3.8561649322509766s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chem2Bio2RDF took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.000823974609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.2857401371002197s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.02174544334411621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chem2Bio2RDF took 2.0265579223632812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.0009226799011230469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.00011897087097167969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chem2Bio2RDF took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chem2bio2rdf took 136.61082887649536s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ChEMBL RDF took 0.794884204864502s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ChEMBL RDF took 0.0005068778991699219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ChEMBL RDF took 0.6996395587921143s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ChEMBL RDF took 0.020172595977783203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ChEMBL RDF took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ChEMBL RDF took 0.0007169246673583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ChEMBL RDF took 4.982948303222656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ChEMBL RDF took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chembl-rdf took 5.166027307510376s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb  dataset took 1.6162941455841064s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb  dataset took 0.0002911090850830078s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb  dataset took 4.585704565048218s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb  dataset took 2.52433705329895s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5321755409240723s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb  dataset took 1.835493803024292s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5342295169830322s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb  dataset took 0.539360761642456s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5298237800598145s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5573978424072266s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb  dataset took 0.513801097869873s
License | MR license check for chemdb  dataset took 0.517613410949707s
License | HR license check for chemdb  dataset took 0.4939229488372803s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5366218090057373s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5563366413116455s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb  dataset took 1.0045170783996582s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb  dataset took 0.49833130836486816s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb  dataset took 0.4997711181640625s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb  dataset took 0.4987459182739258s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb  dataset took 11.597480535507202s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb  dataset took 7.43865966796875e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5181026458740234s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb  dataset took 0.528883695602417s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5180144309997559s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5117106437683105s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb  dataset took 0.4993784427642822s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb  dataset took 1.0537793636322021s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb  dataset took 1.0586698055267334s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb  dataset took 1.8790605068206787s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb  dataset took 9.5367431640625e-07s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5328507423400879s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb  dataset took 0.5428025722503662s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb  dataset took 0.49575376510620117s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb  dataset took 0.558699369430542s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb  dataset took 0.0003116130828857422s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb  dataset took 0.036185503005981445s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5185627937316895s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb  dataset took 1.051201343536377s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb  dataset took 0.6057374477386475s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb  dataset took 2.0642690658569336s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb  dataset took 1.2714648246765137s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb  dataset took 1.805800199508667s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb  dataset took 0.020025014877319336s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb  dataset took 0.5297484397888184s
Security | Sign check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5065085887908936s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb  dataset took 536.2711524963379s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb  dataset took 0.7605655193328857s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb  dataset took 0.020476579666137695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb  dataset took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb  dataset took 0.000720977783203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb  dataset took 6.771087646484375e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb  dataset took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb  dataset took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-basicInfo took 619.3550746440887s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5041470527648926s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.00028014183044433594s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 4.587092399597168s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.5155649185180664s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5254099369049072s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.8659346103668213s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5374672412872314s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.533231258392334s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5409989356994629s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5380449295043945s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.571502685546875s
License | MR license check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.521531343460083s
License | HR license check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4996755123138428s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5534329414367676s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5475115776062012s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 3.448042392730713s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5026187896728516s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5078768730163574s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.511868953704834s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 11.085905313491821s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 7.915496826171875e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5017051696777344s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.52093505859375s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.49666452407836914s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5042250156402588s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5014457702636719s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.026350736618042s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.044870138168335s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.8801991939544678s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 9.5367431640625e-07s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.49192070960998535s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5259828567504883s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.49582910537719727s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5517222881317139s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0003135204315185547s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.039510250091552734s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5053155422210693s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.0265767574310303s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5975627899169922s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.068037748336792s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.2962524890899658s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.791874647140503s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.02128148078918457s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5549163818359375s
Security | Sign check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.49692606925964355s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 220.98749089241028s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.7689635753631592s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.02006053924560547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0007264614105224609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 5.14984130859375e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-estimatedProperties took 307.9824719429016s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5088694095611572s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.00026345252990722656s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb phase transition dataset took 4.623554944992065s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.512042284011841s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5375874042510986s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.8421013355255127s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5301187038421631s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5202746391296387s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5372111797332764s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5467326641082764s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5047297477722168s
License | MR license check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5128974914550781s
License | HR license check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5198462009429932s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.533017635345459s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5379741191864014s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.9863717555999756s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5029439926147461s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5153160095214844s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5173358917236328s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 11.919637203216553s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb phase transition dataset took 7.081031799316406e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5079479217529297s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5279033184051514s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5137338638305664s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5015835762023926s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5069925785064697s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.0295095443725586s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.0451672077178955s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.917577028274536s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 9.5367431640625e-07s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5026106834411621s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5220041275024414s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4892854690551758s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5362415313720703s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.0003807544708251953s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.03575491905212402s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4967987537384033s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.0372405052185059s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5898070335388184s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.0704734325408936s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.2490782737731934s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.7623710632324219s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.01905655860900879s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5236594676971436s
Security | Sign check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.501492977142334s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb phase transition dataset took 162.32244205474854s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.6872661113739014s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.019892215728759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.0007512569427490234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb phase transition dataset took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb phase transition dataset took 9.5367431640625e-07s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb phase transition dataset took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-phaseTransition took 243.57279539108276s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5029816627502441s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.0002872943878173828s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 4.4766716957092285s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.535367965698242s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49959754943847656s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.8285973072052002s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5022401809692383s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5089209079742432s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5048656463623047s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5058162212371826s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4999735355377197s
License | MR license check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5050358772277832s
License | HR license check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49666929244995117s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5151975154876709s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5259745121002197s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.0054388046264648s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49791407585144043s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5075366497039795s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5157854557037354s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 12.112786531448364s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 6.961822509765625e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49980998039245605s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5123987197875977s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5030536651611328s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5138194561004639s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49724888801574707s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.9850430488586426s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.9861695766448975s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.8123061656951904s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.6226043701171875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.48586559295654297s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4848809242248535s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49321603775024414s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4974517822265625s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.0003552436828613281s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.037082672119140625s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5028727054595947s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.9965624809265137s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5601315498352051s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.0349910259246826s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.3048169612884521s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.8029453754425049s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.024718046188354492s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5139226913452148s
Security | Sign check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4978048801422119s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 171.67033338546753s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.8025083541870117s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.01992058753967285s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.811981201171875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 6.151199340820312e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-thermochemistry took 252.0764832496643s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ChemPedia RDF took 5.412101745605469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ChemPedia RDF took 0.0007112026214599609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ChemPedia RDF took 0.2649803161621094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ChemPedia RDF took 0.02014780044555664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ChemPedia RDF took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ChemPedia RDF took 0.0006968975067138672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ChemPedia RDF took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ChemPedia RDF took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chempedia-rdf took 9.475209712982178s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chiman Maru took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chiman Maru took 0.0002865791320800781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chiman Maru took 0.2608797550201416s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chiman Maru took 0.02041172981262207s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chiman Maru took 1.6689300537109375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chiman Maru took 0.0007483959197998047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chiman Maru took 3.695487976074219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chiman Maru took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ChimanMaru_Entrepreneur took 2.8433516025543213s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 392.22898149490356s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.0006802082061767578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 1.2325870990753174s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.020306825637817383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.0007147789001464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 4.696846008300781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Chinese_Red_Classic_Song_Linked_Data_Dataset took 802.3937518596649s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chronicling America took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chronicling America took 0.0005772113800048828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chronicling America took 1.199852705001831s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chronicling America took 0.020534038543701172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chronicling America took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chronicling America took 0.0007116794586181641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chronicling America took 0.00010204315185546875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chronicling America took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chronicling-america took 9.71112585067749s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.7859776020050049s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.0005950927734375s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 92.47339725494385s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 1.7109265327453613s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.5654668807983398s
Interoperability | New terms check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 2.3844377994537354s
Versatility | Languages check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 1.3513660430908203s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.5117697715759277s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3782007694244385s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3408830165863037s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 8.736343622207642s
License | MR license check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.30453968048095703s
License | HR license check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3605167865753174s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3392312526702881s
Understandability | Number of label check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.34284400939941406s
Understandability | URI regex check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.7485008239746094s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3070805072784424s
Verifiability | Authors check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3923921585083008s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3231940269470215s
Performance | Throughput check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 11.381883382797241s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 7.772445678710938e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.5119812488555908s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.32276082038879395s
Interlinking | skos check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.34249138832092285s
Interlinking | skos check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3134176731109619s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3362457752227783s
Currency | Creation date check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.7055447101593018s
Currency | Modification date check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.6223719120025635s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 18.41005563735962s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.33005332946777344s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3108844757080078s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.333864688873291s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 3.600275993347168s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.2270808219909668s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.29075074195861816s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.9915885925292969s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.6029629707336426s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 6.5786192417144775s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 2.261695384979248s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.00014472007751464844s
Security | Sign check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3681347370147705s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 292.16478204727173s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.8497574329376221s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.2023775577545166s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.001131296157836914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.00011444091796875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 1.430511474609375e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for cht took 479.5738887786865s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ciard-ring took 0.00010848045349121094s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ciard-ring took 0.008742332458496094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ciard-ring took 0.25264453887939453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ciard-ring took 0.12756586074829102s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ciard-ring took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ciard-ring took 0.0010135173797607422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ciard-ring took 5.340576171875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ciard-ring took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ciard-ring took 5.355095148086548s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cine Figure took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cine Figure took 0.0004668235778808594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cine Figure took 0.6860713958740234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cine Figure took 0.022298574447631836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cine Figure took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cine Figure took 0.00087738037109375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cine Figure took 5.1021575927734375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cine Figure took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Cine_Figure took 3.712663412094116s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 21.029550313949585s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 0.0007429122924804688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 0.7138354778289795s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 0.020734786987304688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 0.0007097721099853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 6.222724914550781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cinematheque-quebecoise-linked-open-data took 176.05622148513794s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CIPFA took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CIPFA took 0.0005764961242675781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CIPFA took 0.26699280738830566s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CIPFA took 0.020281076431274414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CIPFA took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CIPFA took 0.0007297992706298828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CIPFA took 3.528594970703125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CIPFA took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cipfa took 3.4172866344451904s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 60.028321504592896s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 0.0006706714630126953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 0.7823193073272705s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 0.020322084426879883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 0.0008990764617919922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 0.00040411949157714844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ckan took 264.1714677810669s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 0.8128204345703125s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 0.0005664825439453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 0.6956982612609863s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 0.02028203010559082s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 3.5762786865234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CLaSSES took 6.125700235366821s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Temples of the Classical World took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Temples of the Classical World took 0.0005965232849121094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Temples of the Classical World took 0.2809932231903076s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Temples of the Classical World took 0.019999027252197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Temples of the Classical World took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Temples of the Classical World took 0.0007116794586181641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Temples of the Classical World took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Temples of the Classical World took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for classical_temples took 4.506548166275024s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 1.8446831703186035s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 0.0005660057067871094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 0.2867088317871094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 0.020441770553588867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 0.0007290840148925781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 8.106231689453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clean-energy-data-reegle took 9.314036130905151s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-afbo took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-afbo took 0.0005502700805664062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-afbo took 0.2616696357727051s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-afbo took 0.020262956619262695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-afbo took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-afbo took 0.0007219314575195312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-afbo took 7.62939453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-afbo took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-afbo took 4.86606502532959s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-APICS took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-APICS took 0.0006456375122070312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-APICS took 0.28194117546081543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-APICS took 0.020605802536010742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-APICS took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-APICS took 0.0007538795471191406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-APICS took 7.700920104980469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-APICS took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-apics took 4.0351457595825195s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-EWAVE took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-EWAVE took 0.00033092498779296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-EWAVE took 0.25119566917419434s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-EWAVE took 0.020341873168945312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-EWAVE took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-EWAVE took 0.0008172988891601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-EWAVE took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-EWAVE took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-ewave took 3.540269374847412s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 0.00031065940856933594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 0.28315305709838867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 0.020213842391967773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 0.0007026195526123047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 0.00011515617370605469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-glottolog took 3.5382325649261475s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 0.0004336833953857422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 0.27046656608581543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 0.020463943481445312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 0.0007112026214599609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 7.677078247070312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-phoible took 3.643571376800537s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-SAILS took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-SAILS took 0.0005807876586914062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-SAILS took 0.27819180488586426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-SAILS took 0.020107746124267578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-SAILS took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-SAILS took 0.0007529258728027344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-SAILS took 7.677078247070312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-SAILS took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-sails took 3.6401562690734863s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-WALS took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-WALS took 0.0003516674041748047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-WALS took 0.25498461723327637s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-WALS took 0.02044677734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-WALS took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-WALS took 0.0007104873657226562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-WALS took 7.939338684082031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-WALS took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-wals took 3.5679543018341064s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-WOLD took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-WOLD took 0.0006358623504638672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-WOLD took 0.2537415027618408s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-WOLD took 0.020299196243286133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-WOLD took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-WOLD took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-WOLD took 7.557868957519531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-WOLD took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-wold took 3.4914844036102295s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for COD inventory took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for COD inventory took 0.00027298927307128906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for COD inventory took 0.26976680755615234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for COD inventory took 0.020165681838989258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for COD inventory took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for COD inventory took 0.0007996559143066406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for COD inventory took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for COD inventory took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cod-inventory took 2.930912494659424s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cooperation Databank took 0.11807441711425781s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cooperation Databank took 0.0002300739288330078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cooperation Databank took 0.2631974220275879s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cooperation Databank took 0.0203704833984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cooperation Databank took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cooperation Databank took 0.0007123947143554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cooperation Databank took 3.5762786865234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cooperation Databank took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CoDa took 2.438786506652832s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CODE Endpoint took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CODE Endpoint took 0.0002503395080566406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CODE Endpoint took 0.26122021675109863s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CODE Endpoint took 0.020610570907592773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CODE Endpoint took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CODE Endpoint took 0.0007231235504150391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CODE Endpoint took 3.600120544433594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CODE Endpoint took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for code-endpoint took 2.8637518882751465s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for OpenUpLabs COINS took 0.5554578304290771s
Availability | VoID file availability check for OpenUpLabs COINS took 0.00025343894958496094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for OpenUpLabs COINS took 0.25660133361816406s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for OpenUpLabs COINS took 0.020337581634521484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for OpenUpLabs COINS took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for OpenUpLabs COINS took 0.0007534027099609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for OpenUpLabs COINS took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for OpenUpLabs COINS took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for coins-openuplabs took 2.954993724822998s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 4.1907970905303955s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 0.0003707408905029297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 0.2467648983001709s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 0.02047419548034668s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 0.0007140636444091797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 8.392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CoLChina_sp2000 took 7.966450452804565s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 0.043138980865478516s
Availability | VoID file availability check for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 0.0004572868347167969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 0.2661764621734619s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 0.020480632781982422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 0.0007309913635253906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for colinda took 2.4750449657440186s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CN  2012 took 24.582315683364868s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CN  2012 took 0.0011141300201416016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CN  2012 took 0.2782628536224365s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CN  2012 took 0.020592451095581055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CN  2012 took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CN  2012 took 0.0007314682006835938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CN  2012 took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CN  2012 took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for combined-nomenclature-2012 took 120.84199023246765s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 0.0002467632293701172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 0.7195940017700195s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 0.02049851417541504s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 0.0007510185241699219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for comments-on-literature-in-literature took 4.317469358444214s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 0.0002608299255371094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 0.27314090728759766s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 0.02056264877319336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 0.0007078647613525391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for comparative-analysis-of-production-volume-by-area-of-strawberry-by-period took 3.3569509983062744s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 0.00022745132446289062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 0.6778063774108887s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 0.020508289337158203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 0.0007300376892089844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for comparative-analysis-of-production-volume-by-area-of-watermelon-by-period took 3.8616182804107666s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 7.319450378417969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 0.00023031234741210938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 0.2518494129180908s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 0.020377397537231445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 0.0007114410400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for comparative-analysis-of-production-volume-by-area-of-watermelon-by-period-2 took 2.9540534019470215s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 0.00023937225341796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 0.2716224193572998s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 0.020653247833251953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 0.0007076263427734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for comparison-of-price-competitiveness-of-grape-by-region took 2.979013442993164s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 0.41509366035461426s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 0.0006968975067138672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 0.2857677936553955s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 0.020482778549194336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 0.0007150173187255859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 3.4809112548828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CompHistSem took 4.311194658279419s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 39.01786994934082s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 0.0006999969482421875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 0.6963131427764893s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 0.020390987396240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 0.0007231235504150391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for comsode-d3-2 took 140.15014243125916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ConceptNet took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ConceptNet took 0.0002932548522949219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ConceptNet took 0.27752041816711426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ConceptNet took 0.02068805694580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ConceptNet took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ConceptNet took 0.0007326602935791016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ConceptNet took 3.4809112548828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ConceptNet took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for conceptnet took 3.3577542304992676s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 2011 US Congress People took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 2011 US Congress People took 0.000522613525390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 2011 US Congress People took 0.2584834098815918s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 2011 US Congress People took 0.02051997184753418s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 2011 US Congress People took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 2011 US Congress People took 0.0007240772247314453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 2011 US Congress People took 8.106231689453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 2011 US Congress People took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for congresspeople took 2.9391074180603027s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MIMO took 0.31148195266723633s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MIMO took 0.00030803680419921875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MIMO took 0.6888976097106934s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MIMO took 0.020143985748291016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MIMO took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MIMO took 0.0007550716400146484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MIMO took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MIMO took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CONNECTED took 4.5290749073028564s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for LODsyndesis Dataset took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for LODsyndesis Dataset took 0.00026988983154296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for LODsyndesis Dataset took 0.2631802558898926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for LODsyndesis Dataset took 0.02004694938659668s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for LODsyndesis Dataset took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for LODsyndesis Dataset took 0.0007557868957519531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for LODsyndesis Dataset took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for LODsyndesis Dataset took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for connectivity-of-lod-datasets took 2.973712682723999s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 0.0002346038818359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 0.2649257183074951s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 0.020253419876098633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 2.765655517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for copac-library-catalogue took 2.832688570022583s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Copyright Free Music took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Copyright Free Music took 0.0005817413330078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Copyright Free Music took 0.2805464267730713s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Copyright Free Music took 0.020342350006103516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Copyright Free Music took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Copyright Free Music took 0.0007147789001464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Copyright Free Music took 2.86102294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Copyright Free Music took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Copyright_Free_Music took 4.15800142288208s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CopyrightTermBank took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CopyrightTermBank took 0.0005648136138916016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CopyrightTermBank took 0.7715771198272705s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CopyrightTermBank took 0.020299434661865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CopyrightTermBank took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CopyrightTermBank took 0.0007731914520263672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CopyrightTermBank took 6.747245788574219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CopyrightTermBank took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for copyrighttermbank took 35.311302185058594s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 1.7564208507537842s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 0.0005567073822021484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 0.2693021297454834s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 0.02017831802368164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 0.0008032321929931641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 3.7670135498046875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for core took 7.758392333984375s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.9417905807495117s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.0002551078796386719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.26044297218322754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.021156787872314453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.0007505416870117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Corine_linked_dataset took 3.906229257583618s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 0.00029778480529785156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 0.2850453853607178s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 0.020513534545898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 0.0007383823394775391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 3.24249267578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for corn took 2.912360191345215s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 0.00028228759765625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 0.2595503330230713s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 0.020526409149169922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 0.0007226467132568359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 3.552436828613281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for corn-s-famous-mountainous-district-goesan-environmental-status took 3.362224817276001s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 0.0002665519714355469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 0.2752065658569336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 0.02061319351196289s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 0.0007355213165283203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for corn-s-famous-mountainous-district-jeongseon-environmental-status took 3.4679200649261475s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cornetto1.2 took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cornetto1.2 took 0.0005593299865722656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cornetto1.2 took 0.28929567337036133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cornetto1.2 took 0.020602703094482422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cornetto1.2 took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cornetto1.2 took 0.0007190704345703125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cornetto1.2 took 5.650520324707031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cornetto1.2 took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cornetto took 10.87029767036438s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.3101046085357666s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.0005412101745605469s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 300.06653022766113s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.6780757904052734s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 164.03148531913757s
Interoperability | New terms check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 139.45211243629456s
Versatility | Languages check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 300.06488585472107s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 2.479062795639038s
Security | Check HTTPS for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.33304357528686523s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.38350653648376465s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 17.657772541046143s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.21869993209838867s
License | MR license check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.3249542713165283s
License | HR license check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 300.1033079624176s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.1735060214996338s
Understandability | Number of label check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 5.737847328186035s
Understandability | URI regex check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.42069125175476074s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.11025524139404297s
Verifiability | Authors check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.30748772621154785s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.6336069107055664s
Performance | Throughput check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 10.409703016281128s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 3.600120544433594e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.20108675956726074s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 19.51225781440735s
Interlinking | skos check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.6367125511169434s
Interlinking | skos check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.5215747356414795s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.30603623390197754s
Currency | Creation date check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.6459674835205078s
Currency | Modification date check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.23865246772766113s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 560.2511248588562s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 5.245208740234375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.1614055633544922s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.19086384773254395s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.1328263282775879s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.19069290161132812s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 300.8277909755707s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.6081466674804688s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 104.77872252464294s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 301.4386169910431s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.0001842975616455078s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.8069980144500732s
Security | Sign check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.2020101547241211s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.8185276985168457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.02454829216003418s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.0007290840148925781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 6.0558319091796875e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 2.1457672119140625e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for corporate-body took 16189.735469818115s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Corpus Fibonacci in LiLa took 0.5278646945953369s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Corpus Fibonacci in LiLa took 0.0006754398345947266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Corpus Fibonacci in LiLa took 0.7176258563995361s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Corpus Fibonacci in LiLa took 0.02029871940612793s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Corpus Fibonacci in LiLa took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Corpus Fibonacci in LiLa took 0.0006971359252929688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Corpus Fibonacci in LiLa took 3.504753112792969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Corpus Fibonacci in LiLa took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CorpusFibonacci took 7.0102033615112305s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CORS Check - HTTP Header Logs for Linked Open Data took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CORS Check - HTTP Header Logs for Linked Open Data took 0.0002579689025878906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CORS Check - HTTP Header Logs for Linked Open Data took 0.24074578285217285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CORS Check - HTTP Header Logs for Linked Open Data took 0.02017378807067871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CORS Check - HTTP Header Logs for Linked Open Data took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CORS Check - HTTP Header Logs for Linked Open Data took 0.0007388591766357422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CORS Check - HTTP Header Logs for Linked Open Data took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CORS Check - HTTP Header Logs for Linked Open Data took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for corscheck took 4.611758470535278s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Country Name Authority List took 0.13159561157226562s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Country Name Authority List took 0.0006222724914550781s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Country Name Authority List took 300.10384726524353s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Country Name Authority List took 0.5984082221984863s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Country Name Authority List took 145.34793400764465s
Interoperability | New terms check for Country Name Authority List took 136.56617641448975s
Versatility | Languages check for Country Name Authority List took 300.140682220459s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Country Name Authority List took 11.166098594665527s
Security | Check HTTPS for Country Name Authority List took 0.30036139488220215s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Country Name Authority List took 0.33642005920410156s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Country Name Authority List took 16.01640820503235s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Country Name Authority List took 0.22028636932373047s
License | MR license check for Country Name Authority List took 0.34548234939575195s
License | HR license check for Country Name Authority List took 300.0218713283539s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Country Name Authority List took 0.17961359024047852s
Understandability | Number of label check for Country Name Authority List took 6.370547771453857s
Understandability | URI regex check for Country Name Authority List took 0.3036046028137207s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Country Name Authority List took 0.11833667755126953s
Verifiability | Authors check for Country Name Authority List took 0.1731719970703125s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Country Name Authority List took 0.22248220443725586s
Performance | Throughput check for Country Name Authority List took 10.54126763343811s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Country Name Authority List took 7.271766662597656e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Country Name Authority List took 0.10850787162780762s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Country Name Authority List took 10.750166177749634s
Interlinking | skos check for Country Name Authority List took 0.6176531314849854s
Interlinking | skos check for Country Name Authority List took 0.24444580078125s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Country Name Authority List took 0.3102114200592041s
Currency | Creation date check for Country Name Authority List took 0.5094037055969238s
Currency | Modification date check for Country Name Authority List took 0.23377466201782227s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Country Name Authority List took 586.8317003250122s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Country Name Authority List took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Country Name Authority List took 0.17063546180725098s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Country Name Authority List took 0.15435242652893066s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Country Name Authority List took 0.1333620548248291s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Country Name Authority List took 118.19524955749512s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Country Name Authority List took 3.07302188873291s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Country Name Authority List took 0.17920732498168945s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Country Name Authority List took 300.84834694862366s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Country Name Authority List took 0.4539451599121094s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Country Name Authority List took 119.8334608078003s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Country Name Authority List took 301.4566020965576s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Country Name Authority List took 0.00020313262939453125s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Country Name Authority List took 0.6516964435577393s
Security | Sign check for Country Name Authority List took 0.228224515914917s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Country Name Authority List took 1.060755729675293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Country Name Authority List took 0.0207517147064209s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Country Name Authority List took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Country Name Authority List took 0.0007653236389160156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Country Name Authority List took 5.626678466796875e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Country Name Authority List took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Country Name Authority List took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for country-authority-list took 16042.327523469925s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Courts thesaurus took 0.16521430015563965s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Courts thesaurus took 0.0004851818084716797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Courts thesaurus took 0.7063126564025879s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Courts thesaurus took 0.020341157913208008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Courts thesaurus took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Courts thesaurus took 0.0007045269012451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Courts thesaurus took 7.009506225585938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Courts thesaurus took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for courts-thesaurus took 5.2348268032073975s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Covid-on-the-Web Dataset took 20.52980351448059s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Covid-on-the-Web Dataset took 0.0005691051483154297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Covid-on-the-Web Dataset took 0.7012205123901367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Covid-on-the-Web Dataset took 0.020053625106811523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Covid-on-the-Web Dataset took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Covid-on-the-Web Dataset took 0.0007011890411376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Covid-on-the-Web Dataset took 8.296966552734375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Covid-on-the-Web Dataset took 2.2649765014648438e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for Covid-on-the-Web took 57.228286266326904s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CPA 2008 took 25.38755488395691s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CPA 2008 took 0.0010254383087158203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CPA 2008 took 0.28779077529907227s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CPA 2008 took 0.020217180252075195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CPA 2008 took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CPA 2008 took 0.0007598400115966797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CPA 2008 took 3.838539123535156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CPA 2008 took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cpa-2008 took 122.46076440811157s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.3426501750946045s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.0006566047668457031s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Cooperative Patent Classification took 94.4232292175293s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.969080924987793s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 90.24253487586975s
Versatility | Languages check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 120.19067335128784s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 90.30071806907654s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.1797037124633789s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.24296355247497559s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.2078993320465088s
License | MR license check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.20696377754211426s
License | HR license check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 90.22231602668762s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.32902073860168457s
Understandability | Number of label check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 90.25057578086853s
Understandability | URI regex check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.4504711627960205s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.1635434627532959s
Verifiability | Authors check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.28047800064086914s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.2430117130279541s
Performance | Throughput check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 38.984169483184814s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.0001087188720703125s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.1696157455444336s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.20379018783569336s
Interlinking | skos check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.2325115203857422s
Interlinking | skos check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.28229618072509766s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.19826292991638184s
Currency | Creation date check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.49099040031433105s
Currency | Modification date check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.43667006492614746s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Cooperative Patent Classification took 153.61910724639893s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 7.152557373046875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.21585941314697266s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Cooperative Patent Classification took 18.968488931655884s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Cooperative Patent Classification took 2.9239256381988525s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Cooperative Patent Classification took 4.871036529541016s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.22878336906433105s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Cooperative Patent Classification took 120.38971781730652s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Cooperative Patent Classification took 82.22739458084106s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Cooperative Patent Classification took 1.6625757217407227s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Cooperative Patent Classification took 121.50181007385254s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Cooperative Patent Classification took 2.8054096698760986s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.42339634895324707s
Security | Sign check for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.2725698947906494s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Cooperative Patent Classification took 1.8007547855377197s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cooperative Patent Classification took 1.109832525253296s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.020924091339111328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cooperative Patent Classification took 2.193450927734375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cooperative Patent Classification took 0.0007390975952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cooperative Patent Classification took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Cooperative Patent Classification took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cooperative Patent Classification took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CPC took 1451.621268749237s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CPC 2008 took 25.468804836273193s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CPC 2008 took 0.0007452964782714844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CPC 2008 took 0.26824140548706055s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CPC 2008 took 0.02034592628479004s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CPC 2008 took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CPC 2008 took 0.0006837844848632812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CPC 2008 took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CPC 2008 took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cpc-2008 took 123.44394278526306s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CPV  2003 took 20.47434401512146s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CPV  2003 took 0.001590728759765625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CPV  2003 took 1.2314033508300781s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CPV  2003 took 0.020395278930664062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CPV  2003 took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CPV  2003 took 0.0007054805755615234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CPV  2003 took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CPV  2003 took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cpv-2003 took 114.4530463218689s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CPV 2008 took 23.463046073913574s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CPV 2008 took 0.0008835792541503906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CPV 2008 took 0.7179443836212158s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CPV 2008 took 0.020309925079345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CPV 2008 took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CPV 2008 took 0.0007083415985107422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CPV 2008 took 4.839897155761719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CPV 2008 took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cpv-2008 took 120.82775568962097s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for crowdsourcing-fb took 261.03596568107605s
Availability | VoID file availability check for crowdsourcing-fb took 0.0002574920654296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for crowdsourcing-fb took 0.25981807708740234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for crowdsourcing-fb took 0.020452022552490234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for crowdsourcing-fb took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for crowdsourcing-fb took 0.0007231235504150391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for crowdsourcing-fb took 5.245208740234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for crowdsourcing-fb took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for crowdsourcing-fb took 536.4710273742676s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CRTM took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CRTM took 0.00024271011352539062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CRTM took 0.30553197860717773s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CRTM took 0.020064592361450195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CRTM took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CRTM took 0.0006890296936035156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CRTM took 2.9802322387695312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CRTM took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for crtm took 5.6536078453063965s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Crystal Eye: Aggregated Crystallographic Data took 7.128715515136719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Crystal Eye: Aggregated Crystallographic Data took 0.00030231475830078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Crystal Eye: Aggregated Crystallographic Data took 0.28861403465270996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Crystal Eye: Aggregated Crystallographic Data took 0.020488500595092773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Crystal Eye: Aggregated Crystallographic Data took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Crystal Eye: Aggregated Crystallographic Data took 0.0008687973022460938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Crystal Eye: Aggregated Crystallographic Data took 3.3855438232421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Crystal Eye: Aggregated Crystallographic Data took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for crystal-eye took 4.683810710906982s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CTIC Public Dataset Catalogs took 6.676549673080444s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CTIC Public Dataset Catalogs took 0.0005767345428466797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CTIC Public Dataset Catalogs took 0.356525182723999s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CTIC Public Dataset Catalogs took 0.01995849609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CTIC Public Dataset Catalogs took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CTIC Public Dataset Catalogs took 0.0006935596466064453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CTIC Public Dataset Catalogs took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CTIC Public Dataset Catalogs took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ctic-public-dataset took 44.45333123207092s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cultivation status of GMO crops took 5.2928924560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cultivation status of GMO crops took 0.00023484230041503906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cultivation status of GMO crops took 0.26671624183654785s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cultivation status of GMO crops took 0.020341873168945312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cultivation status of GMO crops took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cultivation status of GMO crops took 0.0007152557373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cultivation status of GMO crops took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cultivation status of GMO crops took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cultivation-status-of-gmo-crops took 3.3810527324676514s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CulturaLinkedData took 10.811556100845337s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CulturaLinkedData took 0.0006833076477050781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CulturaLinkedData took 0.27982544898986816s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CulturaLinkedData took 0.020318984985351562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CulturaLinkedData took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CulturaLinkedData took 0.0006871223449707031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CulturaLinkedData took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CulturaLinkedData took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for culturalinkeddata took 24.417091131210327s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Data about business entities from the ARES system - business registry of the Czech Republic took 30.085699319839478s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Data about business entities from the ARES system - business registry of the Czech Republic took 0.0006632804870605469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Data about business entities from the ARES system - business registry of the Czech Republic took 0.6904747486114502s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Data about business entities from the ARES system - business registry of the Czech Republic took 0.020380496978759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Data about business entities from the ARES system - business registry of the Czech Republic took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Data about business entities from the ARES system - business registry of the Czech Republic took 0.0007104873657226562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Data about business entities from the ARES system - business registry of the Czech Republic took 3.886222839355469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Data about business entities from the ARES system - business registry of the Czech Republic took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-ares-or took 103.53005194664001s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Data about Czech business entities from the ARES system - Trade Licensing Register took 30.04599928855896s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Data about Czech business entities from the ARES system - Trade Licensing Register took 0.0007565021514892578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Data about Czech business entities from the ARES system - Trade Licensing Register took 0.28456974029541016s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Data about Czech business entities from the ARES system - Trade Licensing Register took 0.020763158798217773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Data about Czech business entities from the ARES system - Trade Licensing Register took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Data about Czech business entities from the ARES system - Trade Licensing Register took 0.0007131099700927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Data about Czech business entities from the ARES system - Trade Licensing Register took 3.62396240234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Data about Czech business entities from the ARES system - Trade Licensing Register took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-ares-rzp took 104.22093200683594s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemicals reported to the Integrated register of pollution took 30.02498173713684s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemicals reported to the Integrated register of pollution took 0.0006542205810546875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemicals reported to the Integrated register of pollution took 0.8332476615905762s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemicals reported to the Integrated register of pollution took 0.02029561996459961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemicals reported to the Integrated register of pollution took 1.7881393432617188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemicals reported to the Integrated register of pollution took 0.0006952285766601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemicals reported to the Integrated register of pollution took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemicals reported to the Integrated register of pollution took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-cenia-irz-chemicals took 135.86569738388062s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Integrated pollution registry took 30.09079623222351s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Integrated pollution registry took 0.0006906986236572266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Integrated pollution registry took 0.6970860958099365s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Integrated pollution registry took 0.020181894302368164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Integrated pollution registry took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Integrated pollution registry took 0.0007033348083496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Integrated pollution registry took 3.6716461181640625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Integrated pollution registry took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-cenia-pollution took 123.65362572669983s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Contracts took 30.171441078186035s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Contracts took 0.0006711483001708984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Contracts took 0.30199718475341797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Contracts took 0.020171165466308594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Contracts took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Contracts took 0.000766754150390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Contracts took 3.457069396972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Contracts took 3.123283386230469e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-contracts took 104.55986452102661s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for List of courts of the Czech Republic took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for List of courts of the Czech Republic took 0.0002498626708984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for List of courts of the Czech Republic took 0.6900291442871094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for List of courts of the Czech Republic took 0.02003955841064453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for List of courts of the Czech Republic took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for List of courts of the Czech Republic took 0.0007114410400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for List of courts of the Czech Republic took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for List of courts of the Czech Republic took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-courts took 4.6618053913116455s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bans of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 30.15573024749756s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bans of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.0004987716674804688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bans of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.33920812606811523s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bans of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.02034139633178711s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bans of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bans of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.0006949901580810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bans of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bans of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-ctia-bans took 106.78089380264282s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Confiscations of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 30.09610652923584s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Confiscations of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.0006775856018066406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Confiscations of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.3703293800354004s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Confiscations of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.020415544509887695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Confiscations of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Confiscations of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.0007009506225585938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Confiscations of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 3.910064697265625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Confiscations of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-ctia-confiscations took 104.04835224151611s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Focus of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority's inspections took 30.102690935134888s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Focus of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority's inspections took 0.0007770061492919922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Focus of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority's inspections took 0.2907423973083496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Focus of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority's inspections took 0.020409107208251953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Focus of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority's inspections took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Focus of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority's inspections took 0.0007092952728271484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Focus of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority's inspections took 9.775161743164062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Focus of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority's inspections took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-ctia-focus took 103.24956631660461s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Inspections of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 30.00959610939026s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Inspections of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.001203298568725586s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Inspections of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.310638427734375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Inspections of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.02017998695373535s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Inspections of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 2.0265579223632812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Inspections of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.0007183551788330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Inspections of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.00010418891906738281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Inspections of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-ctia-inspections took 103.16744709014893s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sanctions of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 30.1220383644104s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sanctions of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.0006766319274902344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sanctions of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.29626941680908203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sanctions of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.020639419555664062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sanctions of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sanctions of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 0.0007045269012451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sanctions of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 3.695487976074219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sanctions of the Czech Trade Inspection Authority took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-ctia-sanctions took 104.76244688034058s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cadastre offices from Czech land registry took 20.31229066848755s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cadastre offices from Czech land registry took 0.00078582763671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cadastre offices from Czech land registry took 0.27651500701904297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cadastre offices from Czech land registry took 0.020114421844482422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cadastre offices from Czech land registry took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cadastre offices from Czech land registry took 0.0006899833679199219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cadastre offices from Czech land registry took 3.528594970703125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cadastre offices from Czech land registry took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-cuzk-cadastre-offices took 93.73000025749207s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Code lists of the legal relationships and documents took 20.0894718170166s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Code lists of the legal relationships and documents took 0.0005500316619873047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Code lists of the legal relationships and documents took 0.25662875175476074s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Code lists of the legal relationships and documents took 0.020988941192626953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Code lists of the legal relationships and documents took 2.6702880859375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Code lists of the legal relationships and documents took 0.0010101795196533203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Code lists of the legal relationships and documents took 5.054473876953125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Code lists of the legal relationships and documents took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-cuzk-legal-relationships-documents took 94.45220279693604s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Average salaries in regions of Czech republic took 20.817238807678223s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Average salaries in regions of Czech republic took 0.0005333423614501953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Average salaries in regions of Czech republic took 0.2891678810119629s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Average salaries in regions of Czech republic took 0.0205230712890625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Average salaries in regions of Czech republic took 1.811981201171875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Average salaries in regions of Czech republic took 0.0007238388061523438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Average salaries in regions of Czech republic took 0.0001761913299560547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Average salaries in regions of Czech republic took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-czso-average-salaries took 94.6392126083374s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Deaths by selected causes of death in regions of Czech Republic took 20.2606418132782s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Deaths by selected causes of death in regions of Czech Republic took 0.0005369186401367188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Deaths by selected causes of death in regions of Czech Republic took 0.27871227264404297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Deaths by selected causes of death in regions of Czech Republic took 0.02048349380493164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Deaths by selected causes of death in regions of Czech Republic took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Deaths by selected causes of death in regions of Czech Republic took 0.0007352828979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Deaths by selected causes of death in regions of Czech Republic took 3.695487976074219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Deaths by selected causes of death in regions of Czech Republic took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-czso-deaths-by-selected-causes-of-death took 93.74794316291809s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Number of inhabitants in districts of Czech Republic in 5year age categories took 20.303067207336426s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Number of inhabitants in districts of Czech Republic in 5year age categories took 0.00028133392333984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Number of inhabitants in districts of Czech Republic in 5year age categories took 0.7001583576202393s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Number of inhabitants in districts of Czech Republic in 5year age categories took 0.02044510841369629s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Number of inhabitants in districts of Czech Republic in 5year age categories took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Number of inhabitants in districts of Czech Republic in 5year age categories took 0.0007102489471435547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Number of inhabitants in districts of Czech Republic in 5year age categories took 3.910064697265625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Number of inhabitants in districts of Czech Republic in 5year age categories took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-czso-demography-in-regions-czech-republic-age-categories took 94.45584917068481s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Job applicants in regions of Czech Republic took 20.465861082077026s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Job applicants in regions of Czech Republic took 0.0005047321319580078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Job applicants in regions of Czech Republic took 0.2752954959869385s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Job applicants in regions of Czech Republic took 0.020067214965820312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Job applicants in regions of Czech Republic took 1.71661376953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Job applicants in regions of Czech Republic took 0.0007126331329345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Job applicants in regions of Czech Republic took 3.647804260253906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Job applicants in regions of Czech Republic took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-czso-job-applicants took 93.44153094291687s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Job applicants and unemployment rate in regions of Czech Republic took 20.394829988479614s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Job applicants and unemployment rate in regions of Czech Republic took 0.0005319118499755859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Job applicants and unemployment rate in regions of Czech Republic took 0.28544044494628906s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Job applicants and unemployment rate in regions of Czech Republic took 0.021001100540161133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Job applicants and unemployment rate in regions of Czech Republic took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Job applicants and unemployment rate in regions of Czech Republic took 0.0007884502410888672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Job applicants and unemployment rate in regions of Czech Republic took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Job applicants and unemployment rate in regions of Czech Republic took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-czso-job-applicants-and-unemployment-rate took 93.73754453659058s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Structure of regions of Czech Republic according to Czech Statistical Office took 20.36127758026123s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Structure of regions of Czech Republic according to Czech Statistical Office took 0.0011451244354248047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Structure of regions of Czech Republic according to Czech Statistical Office took 0.2719869613647461s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Structure of regions of Czech Republic according to Czech Statistical Office took 0.02034473419189453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Structure of regions of Czech Republic according to Czech Statistical Office took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Structure of regions of Czech Republic according to Czech Statistical Office took 0.0006940364837646484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Structure of regions of Czech Republic according to Czech Statistical Office took 3.528594970703125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Structure of regions of Czech Republic according to Czech Statistical Office took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-czso-regions took 92.87589430809021s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Selected public health indicators in regions of Czech republic took 20.389825582504272s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Selected public health indicators in regions of Czech republic took 0.0006549358367919922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Selected public health indicators in regions of Czech republic took 0.3374907970428467s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Selected public health indicators in regions of Czech republic took 0.02039027214050293s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Selected public health indicators in regions of Czech republic took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Selected public health indicators in regions of Czech republic took 0.0007166862487792969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Selected public health indicators in regions of Czech republic took 7.390975952148438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Selected public health indicators in regions of Czech republic took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-czso-selected-indicators-of-public-health took 94.53248023986816s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Social service facilities and nursing in districts of Czech republic took 20.310671091079712s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Social service facilities and nursing in districts of Czech republic took 0.0005216598510742188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Social service facilities and nursing in districts of Czech republic took 0.27148866653442383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Social service facilities and nursing in districts of Czech republic took 0.020081043243408203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Social service facilities and nursing in districts of Czech republic took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Social service facilities and nursing in districts of Czech republic took 0.0007061958312988281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Social service facilities and nursing in districts of Czech republic took 3.790855407714844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Social service facilities and nursing in districts of Czech republic took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-czso-social-service-facilities took 94.55371499061584s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Unemployment rate in regions of Czech republic took 20.36407208442688s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Unemployment rate in regions of Czech republic took 0.0005097389221191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Unemployment rate in regions of Czech republic took 0.2548186779022217s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Unemployment rate in regions of Czech republic took 0.020253419876098633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Unemployment rate in regions of Czech republic took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Unemployment rate in regions of Czech republic took 0.0006978511810302734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Unemployment rate in regions of Czech republic took 3.814697265625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Unemployment rate in regions of Czech republic took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-czso-unemployment-rate took 93.44001603126526s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ATC groups took 30.300808668136597s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ATC groups took 0.0007343292236328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ATC groups took 0.7464792728424072s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ATC groups took 0.025278568267822266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ATC groups took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ATC groups took 0.0007159709930419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ATC groups took 6.794929504394531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ATC groups took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-eh-1-atc took 104.36258935928345s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Financial fulfillments took 30.17956233024597s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Financial fulfillments took 0.0007510185241699219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Financial fulfillments took 0.7045972347259521s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Financial fulfillments took 0.02074432373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Financial fulfillments took 1.71661376953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Financial fulfillments took 0.000720977783203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Financial fulfillments took 3.647804260253906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Registry of contracts of the Czech Republic - Financial fulfillments took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-fulfillments took 105.45314288139343s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Czech Business Entity identification numbers and names took 0.043990373611450195s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Czech Business Entity identification numbers and names took 0.0006988048553466797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Czech Business Entity identification numbers and names took 0.2745060920715332s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Czech Business Entity identification numbers and names took 0.02031683921813965s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Czech Business Entity identification numbers and names took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Czech Business Entity identification numbers and names took 0.0006999969482421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Czech Business Entity identification numbers and names took 5.14984130859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Czech Business Entity identification numbers and names took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-ic took 23.348247528076172s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for List of Czech data boxes took 20.0027494430542s
Availability | VoID file availability check for List of Czech data boxes took 0.0007755756378173828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for List of Czech data boxes took 0.7102901935577393s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for List of Czech data boxes took 0.020370960235595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for List of Czech data boxes took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for List of Czech data boxes took 0.0007121562957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for List of Czech data boxes took 3.600120544433594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for List of Czech data boxes took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-list-of-databoxes took 93.4944498538971s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Czech statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community (CZ-NACE) took 20.085339069366455s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Czech statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community (CZ-NACE) took 0.0013098716735839844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Czech statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community (CZ-NACE) took 0.31733202934265137s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Czech statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community (CZ-NACE) took 0.020282506942749023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Czech statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community (CZ-NACE) took 7.367134094238281e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Czech statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community (CZ-NACE) took 0.0007691383361816406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Czech statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community (CZ-NACE) took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Czech statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community (CZ-NACE) took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cz-nace took 94.55346989631653s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Czech National Open Data Catalog in DCAT-AP v1.2 took 0.6827981472015381s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Czech National Open Data Catalog in DCAT-AP v1.2 took 0.0006299018859863281s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Czech National Open Data Catalog in DCAT-AP v1.2 took 43.98370409011841s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Czech National Open Data Catalog in DCAT-AP v1.2 took 1.171865463256836s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Czech National Open Data Catalog in DCAT-AP v1.2 took 0.5775818824768066s
Interoperability | New terms check for Czech National Open Data Catalog in DCAT-AP v1.2 took 1.7831501960754395s
Versatility | Languages check for Czech National Open Data Catalog in DCAT-AP v1.2 took 30.159669876098633s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Czech National Open Data Catalog in DCAT-AP v1.2 took 0.7978389263153076s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Czech National Open Data Catalog in DCAT-AP v1.2 took 0.31415700912475586s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Czech National Open Data Catalog in DCAT-AP v1.2 took 1.2764034271240234s
