Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 5.2928924560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0005028247833251953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.7481927871704102s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.7225415706634521s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 2.2172927856445312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0011289119720458984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0005156993865966797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for 0080-3626 took 8.265746355056763s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用图 took 4.8160552978515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用图 took 0.0002884864807128906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用图 took 0.27652645111083984s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用图 took 0.0203092098236084s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用图 took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用图 took 0.0006957054138183594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用图 took 3.4332275390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用图 took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 10.12041geodata.290864223.ver1.db_ took 4.160344123840332s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 113322 took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 113322 took 0.0008740425109863281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 113322 took 0.27364134788513184s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 113322 took 0.020449161529541016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 113322 took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 113322 took 0.0007073879241943359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 113322 took 3.719329833984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 113322 took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 11 took 5.031740427017212s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Korepetycje Buki took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Korepetycje Buki took 0.00024175643920898438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Korepetycje Buki took 0.701392412185669s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Korepetycje Buki took 0.020766258239746094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Korepetycje Buki took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Korepetycje Buki took 0.0006937980651855469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Korepetycje Buki took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Korepetycje Buki took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 12323 took 2.8004238605499268s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 2.969757556915283s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.0005817413330078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.30369091033935547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.020461082458496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.0007195472717285156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 9.465217590332031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 2000-us-census-rdf took 13.966789722442627s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 1.6938056945800781s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.0005319118499755859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.2907063961029053s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.020494699478149414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.0006926059722900391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 2001-spanish-census-to-rdf took 5.870206117630005s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Open Data Web took 0.31877803802490234s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Open Data Web took 0.00026106834411621094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Open Data Web took 0.27276110649108887s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Open Data Web took 0.020793676376342773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Open Data Web took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Open Data Web took 0.0006911754608154297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Open Data Web took 3.409385681152344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Open Data Web took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data.odw.tw took 2.788799285888672s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用 took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用 took 0.00024700164794921875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用 took 0.3017714023590088s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用 took 0.020572423934936523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用 took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用 took 0.0007271766662597656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用 took 3.314018249511719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用 took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data1.odw.tw took 2.484205484390259s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用模型 took 5.5789947509765625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用模型 took 0.0005335807800292969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用模型 took 0.28484606742858887s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用模型 took 0.020900487899780273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用模型 took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用模型 took 0.0007181167602539062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用模型 took 3.552436828613281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用模型 took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data2.odw.tw took 4.582077503204346s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Indian Biodiversity took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Indian Biodiversity took 0.0006017684936523438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Indian Biodiversity took 0.28161096572875977s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Indian Biodiversity took 0.0206143856048584s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Indian Biodiversity took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Indian Biodiversity took 0.0007293224334716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Indian Biodiversity took 3.409385681152344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Indian Biodiversity took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _https:data.bioontology.orgontologiesBOFdownloadapikey=8b5b7825-538d-40e0-9e9e-5ab9274a9aeb&download_format=rdf took 3.4982125759124756s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.0005509853363037109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.2916698455810547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.020467281341552734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.0006928443908691406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 3.337860107421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for a-collection-of-papers-for-lrec2014-and-related-workshops took 3.8834030628204346s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ITS TEST DATASET took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.00042057037353515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.24661850929260254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.020614147186279297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ITS TEST DATASET took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.0006899833679199219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ITS TEST DATASET took 3.314018249511719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ITS TEST DATASET took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for A1 took 2.9440793991088867s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SummerOlympics took 45.71113324165344s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SummerOlympics took 0.0008425712585449219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SummerOlympics took 0.2897763252258301s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SummerOlympics took 0.020456552505493164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SummerOlympics took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SummerOlympics took 0.0006906986236572266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SummerOlympics took 6.508827209472656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SummerOlympics took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for abc took 123.81759929656982s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Test_m took 4.76837158203125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Test_m took 0.00043129920959472656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Test_m took 0.7184720039367676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Test_m took 0.02895522117614746s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Test_m took 1.9788742065429688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Test_m took 0.0013625621795654297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Test_m took 5.1975250244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Test_m took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ABC took 4.276601314544678s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for my intro took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for my intro took 0.00026154518127441406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for my intro took 0.26842284202575684s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for my intro took 0.02082037925720215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for my intro took 2.7418136596679688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for my intro took 0.0007128715515136719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for my intro took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for my intro took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for abhay_intro took 2.828481912612915s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.20775580406188965s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.0002415180206298828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.7053127288818359s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.020275592803955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.0007123947143554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.00010180473327636719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for abs-linked-data took 3.973323345184326s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Academic Offer of UNL took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.00026345252990722656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.27194905281066895s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.0204923152923584s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Academic Offer of UNL took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.0006916522979736328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Academic Offer of UNL took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Academic Offer of UNL took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for academic-offer-of-unl took 3.026360273361206s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AcadOnto took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AcadOnto took 0.0005037784576416016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AcadOnto took 0.26926374435424805s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AcadOnto took 0.02028203010559082s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AcadOnto took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AcadOnto took 0.0007071495056152344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AcadOnto took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AcadOnto took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for acadonto took 2.889126777648926s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 9.391668319702148s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.0009126663208007812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.26233386993408203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.02059006690979004s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.000728607177734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 3.814697265625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for acorn-sat took 36.42582130432129s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Addgene took 6.628036499023438e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Addgene took 0.0006082057952880859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Addgene took 0.2757904529571533s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Addgene took 0.020267486572265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Addgene took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Addgene took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Addgene took 3.62396240234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Addgene took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for addgene took 15.835243225097656s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.0004322528839111328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.25775885581970215s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.020567655563354492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.0007338523864746094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 9.226799011230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aegp-spanish-textile-and-clothing-association took 3.3020083904266357s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AEMET metereological dataset took 30.396998405456543s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.0008175373077392578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.3629136085510254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.020920753479003906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AEMET metereological dataset took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.0007104873657226562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AEMET metereological dataset took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AEMET metereological dataset took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aemet took 144.51947951316833s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Agenda de Zaragoza took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.00028204917907714844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.27083444595336914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.02064037322998047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Agenda de Zaragoza took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.0007100105285644531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Agenda de Zaragoza took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Agenda de Zaragoza took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agenda-de-zaragoza took 3.7821602821350098s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AgriNepalData took 0.030292034149169922s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AgriNepalData took 0.00024580955505371094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AgriNepalData took 0.25255370140075684s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AgriNepalData took 0.020714998245239258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AgriNepalData took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AgriNepalData took 0.0007932186126708984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AgriNepalData took 7.915496826171875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AgriNepalData took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrinepaldata took 3.26503324508667s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGRIS took 262.51938462257385s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGRIS took 0.0006682872772216797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGRIS took 0.7878401279449463s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGRIS took 0.021246671676635742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGRIS took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGRIS took 0.0007009506225585938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGRIS took 7.891654968261719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGRIS took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agris took 557.704549074173s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGROVOC took 0.18717026710510254s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGROVOC took 0.0005815029144287109s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for AGROVOC took 30.771092176437378s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for AGROVOC took 0.45984363555908203s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for AGROVOC took 14.357704639434814s
Interoperability | New terms check for AGROVOC took 2.7356064319610596s
Versatility | Languages check for AGROVOC took 30.07414197921753s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for AGROVOC took 19.99880313873291s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for AGROVOC took 0.08001828193664551s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for AGROVOC took 0.10206341743469238s
Availability | RDF dump link check for AGROVOC took 0.09256649017333984s
License | MR license check for AGROVOC took 0.08798551559448242s
License | HR license check for AGROVOC took 0.3750307559967041s
Amount of data | Number of property check for AGROVOC took 0.08179330825805664s
Understandability | Number of label check for AGROVOC took 25.337276697158813s
Understandability | URI regex check for AGROVOC took 0.18624305725097656s
Understandability | Vocabs check for AGROVOC took 0.08794140815734863s
Verifiability | Authors check for AGROVOC took 0.0865020751953125s
Verifiability | Publishers check for AGROVOC took 0.09905791282653809s
Performance | Throughput check for AGROVOC took 10.640458583831787s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for AGROVOC took 7.033348083496094e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for AGROVOC took 0.18529319763183594s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for AGROVOC took 0.17737817764282227s
Interlinking | skos check for AGROVOC took 0.18557953834533691s
Interlinking | skos check for AGROVOC took 0.7593882083892822s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for AGROVOC took 0.10193943977355957s
Currency | Creation date check for AGROVOC took 0.1668863296508789s
Currency | Modification date check for AGROVOC took 0.18009114265441895s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for AGROVOC took 31.421685934066772s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for AGROVOC took 2.6226043701171875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for AGROVOC took 0.07932257652282715s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for AGROVOC took 0.07775235176086426s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for AGROVOC took 0.09850692749023438s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for AGROVOC took 18.547738790512085s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for AGROVOC took 2.63124942779541s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for AGROVOC took 0.09982967376708984s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for AGROVOC took 10.746020793914795s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for AGROVOC took 19.58252787590027s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for AGROVOC took 12.674216032028198s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for AGROVOC took 0.0006892681121826172s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for AGROVOC took 0.07935643196105957s
Security | Sign check for AGROVOC took 0.07263422012329102s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGROVOC took 0.3503084182739258s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGROVOC took 0.020745515823364258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGROVOC took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGROVOC took 0.0007045269012451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGROVOC took 0.0001068115234375s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for AGROVOC took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGROVOC took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrovoc took 300.8747010231018s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGROVOC took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGROVOC took 0.00025153160095214844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGROVOC took 0.25888705253601074s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGROVOC took 0.02041006088256836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGROVOC took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGROVOC took 0.0006897449493408203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGROVOC took 5.936622619628906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGROVOC took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrovoc-skos took 4.800276517868042s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Analytics India Magazine took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Analytics India Magazine took 0.0002493858337402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Analytics India Magazine took 0.2715029716491699s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Analytics India Magazine took 0.020595550537109375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Analytics India Magazine took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Analytics India Magazine took 0.0007040500640869141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Analytics India Magazine took 3.743171691894531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Analytics India Magazine took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AIM took 3.336545944213867s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for All India Survey of Higher Education took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.0002532005310058594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.2914144992828369s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.020812034606933594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for All India Survey of Higher Education took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.0007073879241943359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for All India Survey of Higher Education took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for All India Survey of Higher Education took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AISHE took 2.452885150909424s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for  equipment ontology took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for  equipment ontology took 0.0002551078796386719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for  equipment ontology took 0.26973795890808105s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for  equipment ontology took 0.02036142349243164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for  equipment ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for  equipment ontology took 0.0006999969482421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for  equipment ontology took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for  equipment ontology took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for akash took 2.818809747695923s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.0005528926849365234s
Availability | VoID file availability check for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.00024628639221191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.2900986671447754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.02033543586730957s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.0007126331329345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aksworg took 2.947782039642334s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AlchemyAPI took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AlchemyAPI took 0.00024962425231933594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AlchemyAPI took 0.28283238410949707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AlchemyAPI took 0.020445823669433594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AlchemyAPI took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AlchemyAPI took 0.0006916522979736328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AlchemyAPI took 2.9802322387695312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AlchemyAPI took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alchemyapi took 3.0453262329101562s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.00024008750915527344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.293093204498291s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.020320653915405273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.0006971359252929688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alexandria-digital-library-adl-gazetteer took 3.0333032608032227s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for aliada-scanbit-net took 1.1740100383758545s
Availability | VoID file availability check for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.0004851818084716797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.2569766044616699s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.020336389541625977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for aliada-scanbit-net took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.0007047653198242188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.00011157989501953125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for aliada-scanbit-net took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aliada-scanbit-net took 3.7212021350860596s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Allen Brain Atlas took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.0002903938293457031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.29305577278137207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.0205380916595459s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Allen Brain Atlas took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.0007445812225341797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Allen Brain Atlas took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Allen Brain Atlas took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for allen-brain-atlas took 2.932610273361206s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1039149761199951s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.0007615089416503906s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 501.8176109790802s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 3.0812737941741943s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.5098378658294678s
Interoperability | New terms check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 4.405987501144409s
Versatility | Languages check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 300.0630967617035s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 3.5910401344299316s
Security | Check HTTPS for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.8932716846466064s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6483714580535889s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.7812509536743164s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.597357988357544s
License | MR license check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.9860482215881348s
License | HR license check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 38.35659384727478s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5688731670379639s
Understandability | Number of label check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.7680084705352783s
Understandability | URI regex check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.0612521171569824s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6707239151000977s
Verifiability | Authors check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6513245105743408s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6545705795288086s
Performance | Throughput check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 11.360031843185425s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.00011038780212402344s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5425214767456055s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5791854858398438s
Interlinking | skos check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5917236804962158s
Interlinking | skos check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5317351818084717s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.7377712726593018s
Currency | Creation date check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1098544597625732s
Currency | Modification date check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1232869625091553s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 210.04768300056458s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5654494762420654s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6678881645202637s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6378099918365479s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 150.20519518852234s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 3.070474863052368s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.8078489303588867s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6014533042907715s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 12.229820728302002s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 9.446868658065796s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 133.60535788536072s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.5904295444488525s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 12.940148830413818s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.829127073287964s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.8425345420837402s
Security | Sign check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.0335404872894287s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 12199.93654680252s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.464808702468872s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.022801637649536133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.8358230590820312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.0007567405700683594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.00019240379333496094s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.384185791015625e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for allie-abbreviation-and-long-form-database-in-life-science took 13683.956325769424s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alojamientos took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alojamientos took 0.0002696514129638672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alojamientos took 0.289294958114624s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alojamientos took 0.020994901657104492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alojamientos took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alojamientos took 0.0007257461547851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alojamientos took 3.218650817871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alojamientos took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alojamientos-zaragoza took 4.309959173202515s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.4080469608306885s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.0005466938018798828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.2785317897796631s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.02033257484436035s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.0006916522979736328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 3.552436828613281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alpino-rdf took 4.373239517211914s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AAT-atawil took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AAT-atawil took 0.000247955322265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AAT-atawil took 0.7029590606689453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AAT-atawil took 0.020897626876831055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AAT-atawil took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AAT-atawil took 0.0007045269012451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AAT-atawil took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AAT-atawil took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Altawil took 3.2680625915527344s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.00023818016052246094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.27867770195007324s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.020445585250854492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.0007243156433105469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 1.239776611328125e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for am-collections-online took 3.3277928829193115s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amer Nejma took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amer Nejma took 0.0002384185791015625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amer Nejma took 0.2458345890045166s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amer Nejma took 0.020558834075927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amer Nejma took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amer Nejma took 0.0007157325744628906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amer Nejma took 3.170967102050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amer Nejma took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Amer_Nejma took 2.3609538078308105s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 3.886222839355469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.00025582313537597656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.2752387523651123s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.020519018173217773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.0007052421569824219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 3.170967102050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for amon took 2.969919443130493s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.6287541389465332s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.0006442070007324219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.2822892665863037s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.029752492904663086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 2.2649765014648438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.0016129016876220703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.0001647472381591797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for amsterdam-museum-as-edm-lod took 3.7580764293670654s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.0005292892456054688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.27216553688049316s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.029527902603149414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 3.552436828613281e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.0016469955444335938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 6.008148193359375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for analisi-del-blog-http-www-beppegrillo-it took 2.9770917892456055s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Animal Diversity Web took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Animal Diversity Web took 0.0005145072937011719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Animal Diversity Web took 0.2659454345703125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Animal Diversity Web took 0.029674291610717773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Animal Diversity Web took 2.1219253540039062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Animal Diversity Web took 0.0016927719116210938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Animal Diversity Web took 6.914138793945312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Animal Diversity Web took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for animal-diversity-web took 3.0222418308258057s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Anime Dataset took 6.461143493652344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Anime Dataset took 0.0006630420684814453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Anime Dataset took 0.2682771682739258s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Anime Dataset took 0.02097630500793457s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Anime Dataset took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Anime Dataset took 0.0007140636444091797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Anime Dataset took 3.3855438232421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Anime Dataset took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Anime took 3.890329360961914s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ANNO took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ANNO took 0.0005829334259033203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ANNO took 0.24898624420166016s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ANNO took 0.021160602569580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ANNO took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ANNO took 0.0007073879241943359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ANNO took 3.409385681152344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ANNO took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for anno took 14.674479961395264s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.0005481243133544922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.2646334171295166s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.02103900909423828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.0007030963897705078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 8.58306884765625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AntiqueCarsCollection took 3.829937219619751s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for apache took 4.673004150390625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for apache took 0.0006809234619140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for apache took 0.2756352424621582s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for apache took 0.021045684814453125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for apache took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for apache took 0.0007050037384033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for apache took 5.555152893066406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for apache took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apache took 3.290909767150879s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF took 0.0006210803985595703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF took 0.26505136489868164s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF took 0.020653724670410156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF took 0.0007097721099853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF took 4.696846008300781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf took 4.8794214725494385s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.0006687641143798828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.26781678199768066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.020556926727294922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.0006968975067138672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 4.76837158203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-ca-it took 6.156581401824951s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.0006389617919921875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.2614436149597168s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.02088022232055664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.0007116794586181641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 4.9114227294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-ca took 5.600696325302124s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.0005872249603271484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.2921290397644043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.021110057830810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.000736236572265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-es took 5.7452712059021s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.0005891323089599609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.2931392192840576s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.020781278610229492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.0007007122039794922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 4.8160552978515625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-gl took 5.681174278259277s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.0006835460662841797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.2665262222290039s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.020490407943725586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.0006952285766601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-ca took 5.68456244468689s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.0005648136138916016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.2538588047027588s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.021103382110595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.0007483959197998047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 4.839897155761719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-en took 6.217916488647461s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.0006914138793945312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.2746157646179199s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.02069234848022461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.0008053779602050781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 4.76837158203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 2.09808349609375e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-es took 6.136966943740845s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.0006840229034423828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.2771303653717041s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.02075052261352539s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.0007114410400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-fr took 6.204832553863525s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.00041365623474121094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.2562422752380371s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.021137714385986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.0008053779602050781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-an took 5.697861433029175s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.000354766845703125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.26271891593933105s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.021214723587036133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.0009350776672363281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 5.1975250244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ast took 6.100987672805786s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.0006616115570068359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.29235172271728516s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.020777463912963867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.0006995201110839844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ca took 25.0355064868927s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.00010824203491210938s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.0006039142608642578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.2843053340911865s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.020659446716308594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.0007696151733398438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-gl took 6.033409357070923s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.0006427764892578125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.27045726776123047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.020447969436645508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.0007052421569824219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-pt took 5.6436686515808105s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.0005998611450195312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.26869630813598633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.021020889282226562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.0007054805755615234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ro took 5.607736349105835s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.00036907196044921875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.2881300449371338s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.020724773406982422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.0006971359252929688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eu-en took 6.564488172531128s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.0005052089691162109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.27472710609436035s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.020673513412475586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.0007126331329345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eu-es took 5.595625638961792s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.0003764629364013672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.2893218994140625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.020384788513183594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.0007119178771972656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-fr-ca took 5.670950651168823s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.0003178119659423828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.29332709312438965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.020651817321777344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.0006995201110839844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-fr-es took 5.442774057388306s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.0006380081176757812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.25136804580688477s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.020845413208007812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.0007653236389160156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 4.744529724121094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-oc-ca took 5.982800245285034s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.0005958080291748047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.2789180278778076s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.02036452293395996s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.0007035732269287109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-oc-es took 5.573692321777344s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 4.9591064453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.0003273487091064453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.2674105167388916s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.02127218246459961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.0007464885711669922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-pt-ca took 5.762035846710205s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.0005643367767333984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.242112398147583s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.02060842514038086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.0006959438323974609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-pt-gl took 7.242077827453613s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AragoDBPedia took 0.6866986751556396s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AragoDBPedia took 0.00037026405334472656s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for AragoDBPedia took 5.121019124984741s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for AragoDBPedia took 1.9381120204925537s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for AragoDBPedia took 0.9136900901794434s
Interoperability | New terms check for AragoDBPedia took 2.326054096221924s
Versatility | Languages check for AragoDBPedia took 60.53905510902405s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for AragoDBPedia took 5.220362424850464s
Security | Check HTTPS for AragoDBPedia took 0.23141098022460938s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for AragoDBPedia took 0.6196739673614502s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for AragoDBPedia took 1.0864417552947998s
Availability | RDF dump link check for AragoDBPedia took 0.49468016624450684s
License | MR license check for AragoDBPedia took 0.6095101833343506s
License | HR license check for AragoDBPedia took 6.964648008346558s
Amount of data | Number of property check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4603862762451172s
Understandability | Number of label check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5974428653717041s
Understandability | URI regex check for AragoDBPedia took 0.9714679718017578s
Understandability | Vocabs check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5092072486877441s
Verifiability | Authors check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4240145683288574s
Verifiability | Publishers check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4462869167327881s
Performance | Throughput check for AragoDBPedia took 11.763771295547485s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for AragoDBPedia took 6.890296936035156e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4711415767669678s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4709048271179199s
Interlinking | skos check for AragoDBPedia took 0.6431915760040283s
Interlinking | skos check for AragoDBPedia took 0.41819238662719727s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for AragoDBPedia took 0.46702075004577637s
Currency | Creation date check for AragoDBPedia took 1.8529584407806396s
Currency | Modification date check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4117250442504883s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for AragoDBPedia took 5.96465277671814s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for AragoDBPedia took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for AragoDBPedia took 0.43618059158325195s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for AragoDBPedia took 0.5009603500366211s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for AragoDBPedia took 0.45887088775634766s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for AragoDBPedia took 1.1862452030181885s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for AragoDBPedia took 0.02685260772705078s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for AragoDBPedia took 0.029967308044433594s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4112529754638672s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for AragoDBPedia took 4.888284206390381s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for AragoDBPedia took 0.6609697341918945s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for AragoDBPedia took 2.710767984390259s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for AragoDBPedia took 1.4002742767333984s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for AragoDBPedia took 5.620013475418091s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for AragoDBPedia took 0.03244185447692871s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for AragoDBPedia took 0.6652076244354248s
Security | Sign check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5979211330413818s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for AragoDBPedia took 3394.5084269046783s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AragoDBPedia took 1.5881617069244385s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AragoDBPedia took 0.02243971824645996s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AragoDBPedia took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AragoDBPedia took 0.0007224082946777344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AragoDBPedia took 9.655952453613281e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for AragoDBPedia took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AragoDBPedia took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aragodbpedia took 16271.94853258133s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archives Hub Linked Data took 30.40581178665161s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.0007374286651611328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.6950104236602783s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.027574777603149414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archives Hub Linked Data took 2.2411346435546875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.0012056827545166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archives Hub Linked Data took 7.62939453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archives Hub Linked Data took 1.049041748046875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for archiveshub-linkeddata took 85.4285614490509s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archivi ISMA took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archivi ISMA took 0.00034332275390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archivi ISMA took 0.2923567295074463s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archivi ISMA took 0.02431201934814453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archivi ISMA took 1.8835067749023438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archivi ISMA took 0.00122833251953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archivi ISMA took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archivi ISMA took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for archivio-isma took 5.6235740184783936s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ARIADNE took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ARIADNE took 0.00026035308837890625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ARIADNE took 0.2616705894470215s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ARIADNE took 0.02039480209350586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ARIADNE took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ARIADNE took 0.0007073879241943359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ARIADNE took 2.9802322387695312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ARIADNE took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ariadne took 5.229032278060913s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Aristotle University took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Aristotle University took 0.0002422332763671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Aristotle University took 0.3003723621368408s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Aristotle University took 0.02049422264099121s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Aristotle University took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Aristotle University took 0.0007014274597167969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Aristotle University took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Aristotle University took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aristotle-university took 3.8794784545898438s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 4.390910863876343s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.0005402565002441406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.28325772285461426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.020568132400512695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.0007252693176269531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress-e-afmx-1 took 17.894402265548706s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.0002541542053222656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.27972960472106934s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.020323991775512695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.0006949901580810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 2.7418136596679688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress_e-afmx-4 took 3.3939859867095947s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 2.9707553386688232s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.0005984306335449219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.28322720527648926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.020400285720825195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.0006945133209228516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 3.719329833984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress_e-mtab-104 took 13.898300409317017s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.00047397613525390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.35474157333374023s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.020980119705200195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 2.5987625122070312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.0007448196411132812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.00011897087097167969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for artenuevosmedios-gnoss took 253.75061225891113s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 6.318092346191406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.00029349327087402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.7144405841827393s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.02093791961669922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 1.6689300537109375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.0008089542388916016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Arthron took 2.906155586242676s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Arthroscopy community took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Arthroscopy community took 0.0006430149078369141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Arthroscopy community took 0.3006448745727539s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Arthroscopy community took 0.02051520347595215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Arthroscopy community took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Arthroscopy community took 0.0006937980651855469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Arthroscopy community took 0.00010228157043457031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Arthroscopy community took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for arthroscopy took 2.7829127311706543s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.0529077053070068s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0005784034729003906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.2767159938812256s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.020705699920654297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0007150173187255859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for artxscienceinternational-wikidata took 14.920972108840942s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 3.0618793964385986s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.0006868839263916016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.26959729194641113s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.020293235778808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.0006890296936035156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 7.152557373046875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-_NTM-Formosan-Aborigines took 11.92514181137085s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 2.2372288703918457s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.0005640983581542969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.28095245361328125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.0203244686126709s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.0008916854858398438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 8.368492126464844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks took 10.603225708007812s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 2.258322238922119s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.0006434917449951172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.27451658248901367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.02087116241455078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.0007076263427734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 9.1552734375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-AS-TFD-Fish-Species took 11.613370418548584s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 2.2299561500549316s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.0004875659942626953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.2911984920501709s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.02053546905517578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 1.7642974853515625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.0007047653198242188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 4.8160552978515625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-CRB took 13.664252042770386s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 2.240785837173462s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.0006244182586669922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.24628901481628418s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.020428180694580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.0007255077362060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 9.036064147949219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-CTS-TV-Programs took 11.063928127288818s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 2.244357109069824s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.0007076263427734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.6935708522796631s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.01994156837463379s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.0006973743438720703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 3.6716461181640625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-DQOT took 12.540372610092163s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 2.263514995574951s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.0006840229034423828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.2553229331970215s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.020254135131835938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.0006933212280273438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 7.796287536621094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-IHP-WCD took 12.189053297042847s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 2.748412847518921s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.0006418228149414062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.26718616485595703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.020342588424682617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.0007352828979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 7.486343383789062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Linked-Taiwan-Artists took 12.65054202079773s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 2.2372026443481445s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.0006296634674072266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.26918482780456543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.020665884017944336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.0007066726684570312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 5.364418029785156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan took 11.091720581054688s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 2.2515437602996826s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.0006513595581054688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.26433324813842773s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.02043771743774414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 5.125999450683594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths took 11.135090827941895s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 4.9971373081207275s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.0002617835998535156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.27060723304748535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.020880699157714844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.0007026195526123047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 4.57763671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Qing-Secret-Societies took 7.415794134140015s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 2.243131399154663s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.0013432502746582031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.26436495780944824s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.020535707473754883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.0007016658782958984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 7.319450378417969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Tibetan-Audio-Archive took 10.635449409484863s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 2.2513372898101807s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.0006513595581054688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.26842737197875977s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.020605087280273438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.0007028579711914062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 7.748603820800781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC_-_CCP_Archive took 12.101135492324829s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 2.230076789855957s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.0007069110870361328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.2846508026123047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.02026057243347168s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.0007245540618896484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC_-_DNB took 10.660770416259766s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.0006415843963623047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.2769038677215576s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.020293235778808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.0007395744323730469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 6.866455078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asit took 6.608158826828003s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.0006475448608398438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.26297688484191895s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.02049875259399414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.0007050037384033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 3.743171691894531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asjp took 4.794568300247192s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ASN:US took 524.7871804237366s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ASN:US took 0.0008733272552490234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ASN:US took 0.3606729507446289s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ASN:US took 0.020696640014648438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ASN:US took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ASN:US took 0.0007233619689941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ASN:US took 7.534027099609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ASN:US took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asn-us took 1337.951683998108s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.0004239082336425781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.27054834365844727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.020552873611450195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.0006895065307617188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aspire-mmu took 7.343041896820068s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for associations took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for associations took 0.0006310939788818359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for associations took 0.26900434494018555s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for associations took 0.0204617977142334s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for associations took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for associations took 0.0006911754608154297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for associations took 6.318092346191406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for associations took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for associations took 8.669940948486328s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.0002453327178955078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.6925351619720459s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.020324230194091797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.0007011890411376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 2.765655517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for atc-publikovan--s-kl took 3.3562943935394287s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.0006139278411865234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.27242207527160645s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.020546436309814453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.0007081031799316406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 9.131431579589844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for athelia-rfid took 4.672224283218384s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.0006549358367919922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.25139403343200684s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.024863719940185547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.0014362335205078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for auditsocials-glossary took 4.555798768997192s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AUEB Linked Open Data took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.0002205371856689453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.28177332878112793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.020867347717285156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AUEB Linked Open Data took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.0007026195526123047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AUEB Linked Open Data took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AUEB Linked Open Data took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aueb-linked-open-data took 3.7871408462524414s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.4920952320098877s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.0006732940673828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.26546335220336914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.0203397274017334s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.000698089599609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 5.459785461425781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AugustiniConfessiones took 3.7604026794433594s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.6188788414001465s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.000537872314453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.2907547950744629s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.020034313201904297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.0007004737854003906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 8.869171142578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for austrian_ski_racers took 3.9393868446350098s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AVsOnto took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AVsOnto took 0.0005457401275634766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AVsOnto took 0.254716157913208s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AVsOnto took 0.020094633102416992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AVsOnto took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AVsOnto took 0.0007269382476806641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AVsOnto took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AVsOnto took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AVsOnto took 3.273282051086426s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.3028409481048584s
Availability | VoID file availability check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.0005311965942382812s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 210.82428216934204s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.478839635848999s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.09016013145447s
Interoperability | New terms check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 200.98774790763855s
Versatility | Languages check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.08080530166626s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.06008887290955s
Security | Check HTTPS for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.229949951171875s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.2941269874572754s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.1534900665283203s
Availability | RDF dump link check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.13689088821411133s
License | MR license check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 48.13536739349365s
License | HR license check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.0613422393799s
Amount of data | Number of property check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.15964102745056152s
Understandability | Number of label check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 206.7866656780243s
Understandability | URI regex check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.23232388496398926s
Understandability | Vocabs check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.13938188552856445s
Verifiability | Authors check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.10569477081298828s
Verifiability | Publishers check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.0975801944732666s
Performance | Throughput check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 10.479995012283325s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 8.726119995117188e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.09083247184753418s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.0686180591583s
Interlinking | skos check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.13819026947021484s
Interlinking | skos check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.1275634765625s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.13149595260620117s
Currency | Creation date check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.24716591835021973s
Currency | Modification date check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.2772994041442871s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 361.69485449790955s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 3.5762786865234375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.11278557777404785s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 4.80078387260437s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.13032126426696777s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.25690817832947s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 65.98026180267334s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 3.294665813446045s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 301.3956141471863s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.8477671146392822s
Security | Sign check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.15290451049804688s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.2119226455688477s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.33811330795288086s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.020787715911865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.0006937980651855469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 7.033348083496094e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for b3kat took 3849.8416616916656s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BabelNet took 0.5418448448181152s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BabelNet took 0.0005824565887451172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BabelNet took 0.2760651111602783s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BabelNet took 0.020708322525024414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BabelNet took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BabelNet took 0.0010023117065429688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BabelNet took 0.00018548965454101562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BabelNet took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for babelnet took 4.493004322052002s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bacevicius.lt took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bacevicius.lt took 0.0002772808074951172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bacevicius.lt took 0.2589561939239502s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bacevicius.lt took 0.020264148712158203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bacevicius.lt took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bacevicius.lt took 0.0006959438323974609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bacevicius.lt took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bacevicius.lt took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bacevicius.lt took 2.3956716060638428s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.530402660369873s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.0005021095275878906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.25646448135375977s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.020679473876953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.0007424354553222656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bag took 4.32297158241272s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.5894608497619629s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0002162456512451172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.2790963649749756s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.020696401596069336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0006968975067138672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue took 3.1207733154296875s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for baixue composer took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for baixue composer took 0.0005526542663574219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for baixue composer took 0.30495762825012207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for baixue composer took 0.020428180694580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for baixue composer took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for baixue composer took 0.0007259845733642578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for baixue composer took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for baixue composer took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_composer took 3.3299484252929688s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0006237030029296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.2752399444580078s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.020191669464111328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_imagery took 2.938831090927124s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0013642311096191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.2855195999145508s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.020370960235595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0007288455963134766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_imagery1 took 3.7355806827545166s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BAMS took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BAMS took 0.00023317337036132812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BAMS took 0.2622220516204834s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BAMS took 0.020487546920776367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BAMS took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BAMS took 0.0006995201110839844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BAMS took 2.86102294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BAMS took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bams took 3.0064499378204346s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0005652904510498047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.2738301753997803s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.020288705825805664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0007500648498535156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 3.8623809814453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for basque-eurowordnet-lemon-lexicon-3-0 took 3.045328140258789s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Music took 0.4009878635406494s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Music took 0.0004298686981201172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Music took 0.2676680088043213s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Music took 0.020383596420288086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Music took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Music took 0.00070953369140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Music took 0.00012302398681640625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Music took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-music took 6.960703134536743s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Programmes took 0.27169203758239746s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Programmes took 0.0006763935089111328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Programmes took 0.26611852645874023s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Programmes took 0.020637989044189453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Programmes took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Programmes took 0.0006875991821289062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Programmes took 9.918212890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Programmes took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-programmes took 11.422819375991821s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.2478499412536621s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.000652313232421875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.3066408634185791s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.02036595344543457s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Wildlife Finder took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.0007376670837402344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.00010371208190917969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Wildlife Finder took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-wildlife-finder took 8.42961049079895s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBOP took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBOP took 0.0002498626708984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBOP took 0.3009359836578369s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBOP took 0.020606279373168945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBOP took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBOP took 0.0007092952728271484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBOP took 2.7179718017578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBOP took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbop took 3.027714967727661s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBOP took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBOP took 0.0004584789276123047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBOP took 0.26787781715393066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBOP took 0.020348787307739258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBOP took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBOP took 0.0007283687591552734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBOP took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBOP took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbop-selected took 19.72666907310486s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bdgp took 2.1022696495056152s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bdgp took 0.0006315708160400391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bdgp took 0.24932575225830078s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bdgp took 0.02052760124206543s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bdgp took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bdgp took 0.0007231235504150391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bdgp took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bdgp took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bdgp took 9.198940992355347s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bendev Junior took 5.602836608886719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bendev Junior took 0.0005826950073242188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bendev Junior took 0.29131054878234863s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bendev Junior took 0.02031564712524414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bendev Junior took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bendev Junior took 0.0007188320159912109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bendev Junior took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bendev Junior took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bendevoficial took 5.353932857513428s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 4.650547981262207s
Availability | VoID file availability check for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.0006034374237060547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.2535674571990967s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.020520687103271484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.0007159709930419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 7.367134094238281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for beneficiaries-of-the-european-commission took 12.648195266723633s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.00010037422180175781s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.00022864341735839844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.25359201431274414s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.020812273025512695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.000701904296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for berlin-offener-haushalt took 2.9622364044189453s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for berlios took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for berlios took 0.0004730224609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for berlios took 0.2814326286315918s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for berlios took 0.020790576934814453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for berlios took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for berlios took 0.0006961822509765625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for berlios took 8.654594421386719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for berlios took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for berlios took 2.9220194816589355s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Between Our Worlds took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Between Our Worlds took 0.0005979537963867188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Between Our Worlds took 0.3231160640716553s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Between Our Worlds took 0.02069377899169922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Between Our Worlds took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Between Our Worlds took 0.0006988048553466797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Between Our Worlds took 6.604194641113281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Between Our Worlds took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for betweenourworlds took 9.71914291381836s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.17282485961914062s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.00045943260192871094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.26621365547180176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.020471811294555664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.0007412433624267578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 8.893013000488281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bfs-linked-data took 2.7532095909118652s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BibBase took 0.07090258598327637s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BibBase took 0.0005071163177490234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BibBase took 0.2909715175628662s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BibBase took 0.020576953887939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BibBase took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BibBase took 0.000698089599609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BibBase took 9.560585021972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BibBase took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bibbase took 2.592120409011841s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.0005197525024414062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.2754552364349365s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.02033853530883789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.0006988048553466797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 9.775161743164062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-escolar-digital-cita took 4.578762769699097s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 4.9591064453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.0005354881286621094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.26834797859191895s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.020959138870239258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.0007042884826660156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 9.679794311523438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-nacional-escolar-bnescolar took 3.026965379714966s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.0002658367156982422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.2599449157714844s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.020564556121826172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 8.344650268554688e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.0007078647613525391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-virtual-miguel-de-cervantes-bvmc-linked-open-data took 2.977567434310913s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.0006797313690185547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.2685062885284424s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.020820140838623047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.0007410049438476562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 3.552436828613281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for BibSonomy took 6.820590496063232s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.0007424354553222656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.25135135650634766s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.02048516273498535s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.0006902217864990234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 2.86102294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for billion_triples_challenge_dataset2008 took 108.85864639282227s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.0005249977111816406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.2759101390838623s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.020405054092407227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.0008211135864257812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for billion_triples_challenge_dataset_2010 took 2.729302406311035s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.0002651214599609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.26836156845092773s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.020442724227905273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.0007429122924804688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 2.9802322387695312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-acfsid took 2.9671969413757324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 39.02127647399902s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.0005025863647460938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.269930362701416s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.020638704299926758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.0007154941558837891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.0001010894775390625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-affymetrix took 139.14042973518372s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 39.02716660499573s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.0006265640258789062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.27429723739624023s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.020573139190673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.0007252693176269531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.00010585784912109375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-biomodels took 179.19552731513977s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 3.910064697265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.0002353191375732422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.2659482955932617s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.022617340087890625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.0012581348419189453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-biomodels-biopax took 2.9794466495513916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 39.02178692817688s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.0006322860717773438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.36597180366516113s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.02104926109313965s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.0007152557373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.0004322528839111328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-bioportal took 179.73478293418884s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 39.02189064025879s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.0005011558532714844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.2850024700164795s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.020733356475830078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.0007047653198242188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 5.173683166503906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-chembl took 139.96567487716675s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 39.02231431007385s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.0007076263427734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.2631657123565674s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.020459651947021484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.0007274150848388672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-clinicaltrials took 179.39904522895813s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 39.024718046188354s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.0005338191986083984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.29112720489501953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.020782470703125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.000701904296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 6.842613220214844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ctd took 139.95623588562012s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-dataset took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.0006899833679199219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.3183298110961914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.028013944625854492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-dataset took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.0007174015045166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-dataset took 5.4836273193359375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-dataset took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-dataset took 22.496946334838867s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 39.022883892059326s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.00067138671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.3255589008331299s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.020532846450805664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 1.7881393432617188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.000720977783203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 6.508827209472656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-dbsnp took 165.06333017349243s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 39.02005386352539s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.0005137920379638672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.2726297378540039s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.02097344398498535s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 1.7642974853515625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.0010333061218261719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.0001163482666015625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-drugbank took 139.51926350593567s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 39.01978540420532s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.0005364418029785156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.2727799415588379s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.020548343658447266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Genage took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.000698089599609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Genage took 5.650520324707031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Genage took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-genage took 179.32733988761902s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.0002307891845703125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.27872323989868164s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.020740509033203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.0007121562957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 5.7697296142578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-genbank took 2.999703884124756s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 39.02057480812073s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.0005712509155273438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.33779406547546387s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.02070784568786621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.0007154941558837891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 5.078315734863281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-gendr took 179.19209218025208s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 39.02068114280701s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.0005242824554443359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.2903475761413574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.0205233097076416s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Goa took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.0007052421569824219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Goa took 6.0558319091796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Goa took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-goa took 139.6080822944641s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 39.023597717285156s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.0005366802215576172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.26088953018188477s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.02068161964416504s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.0007059574127197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.000102996826171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-hgnc took 139.44467973709106s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 39.022061586380005s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.0007908344268798828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.27011895179748535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.02088308334350586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.0007050037384033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 5.698204040527344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-homologene took 140.70957589149475s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::INOH took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.000263214111328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.27241063117980957s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.020666122436523438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::INOH took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.0007121562957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::INOH took 3.337860107421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::INOH took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-inoh took 3.0529398918151855s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 39.02180528640747s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.0009107589721679688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.35449671745300293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.02078390121459961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.0007321834564208984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 9.369850158691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-interpro took 179.59676313400269s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 39.03162407875061s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.0005192756652832031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.2835056781768799s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.02151203155517578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.0007755756378173828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 7.867813110351562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-iproclass took 180.14200615882874s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 39.0186767578125s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.0005583763122558594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.3968946933746338s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.021193981170654297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.0007119178771972656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 8.106231689453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-irefindex took 139.73859453201294s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.0002627372741699219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.28996849060058594s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.02065443992614746s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.0007436275482177734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 6.389617919921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-kegg took 3.0820701122283936s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.00022077560424804688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.2667558193206787s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.020763397216796875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.0007331371307373047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 3.337860107421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-kegg-biopax took 2.9898715019226074s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 39.01851773262024s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.0006496906280517578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.2832210063934326s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.020767688751220703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.0007226467132568359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 3.4809112548828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-linkedspl took 179.60884356498718s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 39.18217658996582s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.0005123615264892578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.32504796981811523s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.020975112915039062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.0007140636444091797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-lsr took 139.96506142616272s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 39.022969245910645s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.0005750656127929688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.2621898651123047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.02081918716430664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.0007138252258300781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 6.961822509765625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-mesh took 139.7596881389618s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 39.021870136260986s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.0005154609680175781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.3099079132080078s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.02075815200805664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.0007040500640869141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 8.606910705566406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-mgi took 179.27173495292664s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 39.019813776016235s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.0004904270172119141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.2810647487640381s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.02081894874572754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.0007174015045166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.00011372566223144531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ncbigene took 139.89031267166138s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 39.021406412124634s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.0002875328063964844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.2565627098083496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.020754337310791016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.0007107257843017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ndc took 139.73253297805786s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.0002620220184326172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.2782304286956787s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.020794153213500977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.0006945133209228516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-netpath took 2.936610221862793s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 39.0112247467041s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.00039696693420410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.2880115509033203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.021967411041259766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.0009205341339111328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 3.62396240234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-nextprot took 99.91819787025452s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 39.01559782028198s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.0005946159362792969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.26823854446411133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.020339488983154297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Omim took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.0006997585296630859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.0001246929168701172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Omim took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-omim took 139.8152015209198s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.00034499168395996094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.26889801025390625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.026362180709838867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.0008087158203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 22.563923597335815s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 39.0168879032135s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.0005388259887695312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.31127381324768066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.020970821380615234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.0007059574127197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 7.557868957519531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-orphanet took 179.3380799293518s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 39.02072262763977s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.0006163120269775391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.30560970306396484s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.020589590072631836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.0007061958312988281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 3.62396240234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pathwaycommons took 179.30974340438843s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 39.02200698852539s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.000537872314453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.32645392417907715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.020627975463867188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.0006957054138183594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 7.677078247070312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pharmgkb took 140.0096561908722s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.00023412704467773438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.2977569103240967s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.020467281341552734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.0008304119110107422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 3.337860107421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pharmgkb-biopax took 3.0650856494903564s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PID took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.00025272369384765625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.2974717617034912s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.03185081481933594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PID took 1.7404556274414062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.0009510517120361328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PID took 3.7670135498046875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PID took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pid took 3.0035037994384766s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.00029730796813964844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.2747819423675537s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.02070903778076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.0007326602935791016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pubchem-2 took 3.0273654460906982s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 39.02395248413086s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.0007388591766357422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.277477502822876s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.020661115646362305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.000896453857421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.00014281272888183594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pubmed took 160.2078104019165s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.00026226043701171875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.2779104709625244s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.02117466926574707s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.0007576942443847656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 7.128715515136719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-reactome took 3.052318811416626s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.00027823448181152344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.3052077293395996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.020997047424316406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.0007441043853759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 5.555152893066406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-rhea took 2.9851319789886475s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 39.02373695373535s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.0005581378936767578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.2592897415161133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.02113819122314453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.0007307529449462891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 8.654594421386719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sabiork took 139.88637733459473s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 39.02090811729431s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.0005369186401367188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.2804281711578369s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.020769596099853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.0007314682006835938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 9.942054748535156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sgd took 139.77072095870972s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.0006196498870849609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.27736926078796387s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.021324634552001953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.0007143020629882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 22.565155267715454s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 39.02269434928894s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.0005419254302978516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.29053521156311035s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.020438194274902344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sider took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.0006957054138183594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sider took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sider took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sider took 179.5927758216858s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.0002651214599609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.26878833770751953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.020920515060424805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.0007009506225585938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-spike took 2.9422507286071777s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-taxon took 5.745887756347656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.0007617473602294922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.2802271842956543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.021056413650512695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-taxon took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.0007352828979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-taxon took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-taxon took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-taxon took 22.458662271499634s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 39.021042346954346s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.0005285739898681641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.374453067779541s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.020888090133666992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.000698089599609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.00010037422180175781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-taxonomy took 139.9298357963562s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 39.02203178405762s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.0004980564117431641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.4822535514831543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.020620346069335938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.0007162094116210938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-wikipathways took 180.0942873954773s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 39.023043155670166s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.0005431175231933594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.33002638816833496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.02098226547241211s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 2.7418136596679688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.0007114410400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 7.62939453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-wormbase took 179.514488697052s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biografías y Vidas took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biografías y Vidas took 0.00025081634521484375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biografías y Vidas took 0.2885599136352539s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biografías y Vidas took 0.02068948745727539s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biografías y Vidas took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biografías y Vidas took 0.0007059574127197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biografías y Vidas took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biografías y Vidas took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biografiasyvidas took 2.3946332931518555s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.26169681549072266s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.0002052783966064453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.2860682010650635s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.02093648910522461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.0007123947143554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 8.106231689453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biographical-directory-of-the-united-states-congress took 2.735973834991455s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.00022983551025390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.27954626083374023s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.021045923233032227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.0007009506225585938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biolit took 3.040599822998047s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.00036835670471191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.26019930839538574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.020783424377441406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.0007104873657226562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biolod-pdb took 7.185041904449463s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioModels RDF took 0.7426931858062744s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioModels RDF took 0.000682830810546875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioModels RDF took 0.2806856632232666s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioModels RDF took 0.020320892333984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioModels RDF took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioModels RDF took 0.0007622241973876953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioModels RDF took 3.7670135498046875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioModels RDF took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biomodels-rdf took 3.865222215652466s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 2.6562750339508057s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.0006642341613769531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.2670726776123047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.020252704620361328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.0007433891296386719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Biop took 7.188786506652832s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.0005753040313720703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.28908658027648926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.020374298095703125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 8.344650268554688e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.0006930828094482422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bioportal took 2.5792782306671143s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amphibian gross anatomy took 5.412101745605469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0003039836883544922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.27201128005981445s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.02077960968017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amphibian gross anatomy took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0006170272827148438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amphibian gross anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aao took 2.6895744800567627s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.0005288124084472656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.25792360305786133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.020251989364624023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.0006978511810302734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.00030112266540527344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aba took 2.7197017669677734s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.0004961490631103516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.27211713790893555s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.02070164680480957s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.0006926059722900391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.0014455318450927734s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-acgt took 2.7359373569488525s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Animal natural history and life history took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Animal natural history and life history took 0.00047707557678222656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Animal natural history and life history took 0.26372218132019043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Animal natural history and life history took 0.020360708236694336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Animal natural history and life history took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Animal natural history and life history took 0.0007429122924804688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Animal natural history and life history took 0.0003304481506347656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Animal natural history and life history took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-adw took 2.7330620288848877s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.00047588348388671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.2678346633911133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.020411252975463867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.0007255077362060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.0004725456237792969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aeo took 2.6209707260131836s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0004966259002685547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.26328372955322266s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.020214319229125977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0007050037384033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0009515285491943359s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aero took 2.604689359664917s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AI/RHEUM took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AI/RHEUM took 0.000518798828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AI/RHEUM took 0.27858495712280273s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AI/RHEUM took 0.020394086837768555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AI/RHEUM took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AI/RHEUM took 0.0007090568542480469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AI/RHEUM took 0.00039315223693847656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AI/RHEUM took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-air took 2.676318407058716s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amino Acid took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amino Acid took 0.00027298927307128906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amino Acid took 0.280123233795166s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amino Acid took 0.02173614501953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amino Acid took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amino Acid took 0.0007011890411376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amino Acid took 0.00024580955505371094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amino Acid took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-amino-acid took 2.6727192401885986s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.0003285408020019531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.25275707244873047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.02086162567138672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.0007059574127197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.0002713203430175781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-apo took 2.5661141872406006s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for African Traditional Medicine took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for African Traditional Medicine took 0.00031495094299316406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for African Traditional Medicine took 0.28049564361572266s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for African Traditional Medicine took 0.020565271377563477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for African Traditional Medicine took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for African Traditional Medicine took 0.0007264614105224609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for African Traditional Medicine took 0.0002319812774658203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for African Traditional Medicine took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-atmo took 2.5850703716278076s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amphibian taxonomy took 6.127357482910156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.00045561790466308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.29236316680908203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.020801544189453125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amphibian taxonomy took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.0007085800170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amphibian taxonomy took 8.7738037109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amphibian taxonomy took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ato took 2.601738929748535s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioAssay Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0002415180206298828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioAssay Ontology took 0.2893385887145996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioAssay Ontology took 0.020702123641967773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioAssay Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0007042884826660156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0013129711151123047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioAssay Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bao took 2.5739896297454834s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.0003223419189453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.28145551681518555s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.020638465881347656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.0007236003875732422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.0003826618194580078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-basic-vertebrate-gross-anatomy took 2.623915910720825s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 7.271766662597656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.0005171298980712891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.27576327323913574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.02050638198852539s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.0007147789001464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.0003104209899902344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bcgo took 2.686614751815796s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.0004794597625732422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.28939342498779297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.02026081085205078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.0007038116455078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.001369476318359375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bdo took 2.663226842880249s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basic Formal Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0004878044128417969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.27309083938598633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.02026844024658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basic Formal Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0006952285766601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0004665851593017578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basic Formal Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bfo took 2.6804213523864746s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bleeding History Phenotype took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.00046896934509277344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.2618527412414551s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.020307064056396484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bleeding History Phenotype took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.0006997585296630859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.0007224082946777344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bleeding History Phenotype took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bho took 2.6068947315216064s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bilateria anatomy took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bilateria anatomy took 0.0005631446838378906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bilateria anatomy took 0.3013477325439453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bilateria anatomy took 0.020279407501220703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bilateria anatomy took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bilateria anatomy took 0.0007336139678955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bilateria anatomy took 0.00042700767517089844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bilateria anatomy took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bila took 2.726405382156372s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BIRNLex took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BIRNLex took 0.0004963874816894531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BIRNLex took 0.26703572273254395s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BIRNLex took 0.020815372467041016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BIRNLex took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BIRNLex took 0.0006990432739257812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BIRNLex took 0.0014340877532958984s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BIRNLex took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-birnlex took 2.658005952835083s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0005137920379638672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.2630443572998047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.02062535285949707s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Regulation Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007002353668212891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007274150848388672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Regulation Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bootstrep took 2.7562243938446045s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioPAX took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioPAX took 0.000507354736328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioPAX took 0.28632593154907227s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioPAX took 0.020398855209350586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioPAX took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioPAX took 0.0007207393646240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioPAX took 9.608268737792969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioPAX took 1.52587890625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bp took 2.6926276683807373s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 4.8160552978515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.0004894733428955078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.26952576637268066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.020265817642211914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.0006885528564453125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.0003063678741455078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bro_x1 took 2.6832613945007324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Spatial Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Spatial Ontology took 0.00046634674072265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Spatial Ontology took 0.30971193313598633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Spatial Ontology took 0.020162343978881836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Spatial Ontology took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Spatial Ontology took 0.0006928443908691406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Spatial Ontology took 0.00020265579223632812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Spatial Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bspo took 2.688291072845459s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioTop took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioTop took 0.00046181678771972656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioTop took 0.25702381134033203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioTop took 0.02044820785522461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioTop took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioTop took 0.0007088184356689453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioTop took 0.0006418228149414062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioTop took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bt took 2.6052803993225098s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.000476837158203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.2799227237701416s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.02027130126953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.0006937980651855469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.0008566379547119141s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bto took 2.631751775741577s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0004754066467285156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.34395265579223633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.02054309844970703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0006866455078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0017712116241455078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-canco took 3.0812344551086426s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CAO took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CAO took 0.00046634674072265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CAO took 0.28804588317871094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CAO took 0.02028369903564453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CAO took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CAO took 0.0006954669952392578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CAO took 0.000591278076171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CAO took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cao took 2.65452241897583s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CareLex took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CareLex took 0.0004963874816894531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CareLex took 0.2892777919769287s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CareLex took 0.020558595657348633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CareLex took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CareLex took 0.000698089599609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CareLex took 4.792213439941406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CareLex took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-carelex took 2.6526923179626465s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell Cycle Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.0005266666412353516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.25438475608825684s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.02060866355895996s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell Cycle Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.000705718994140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.0007758140563964844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell Cycle Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cco took 2.7014875411987305s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.00027108192443847656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.2891831398010254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.020523786544799805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.0007636547088623047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.0002560615539550781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cdao took 2.654344320297241s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical entities of biological interest took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0004909038543701172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.30533385276794434s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.02036452293395996s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical entities of biological interest took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0007028579711914062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0008075237274169922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical entities of biological interest took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-chebi took 2.7513792514801025s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.0011026859283447266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.26610279083251953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.020124435424804688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.0007069110870361328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.00023627281188964844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-chem2bio2owl took 2.6366989612579346s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical Information Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0004496574401855469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.26433277130126953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.02028822898864746s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical Information Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0007760524749755859s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical Information Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cheminf took 2.623666763305664s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell type took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell type took 0.0005021095275878906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell type took 0.27968835830688477s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell type took 0.020522356033325195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell type took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell type took 0.0006949901580810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell type took 0.00037479400634765625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell type took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cl took 2.670280694961548s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell Line Ontology took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell Line Ontology took 0.0005140304565429688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell Line Ontology took 0.2864835262298584s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell Line Ontology took 0.020287752151489258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell Line Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell Line Ontology took 0.0007100105285644531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell Line Ontology took 0.0008068084716796875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell Line Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-clo took 2.657884359359741s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.0004775524139404297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.2850663661956787s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.020305395126342773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.0001621246337890625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cmo took 2.6203737258911133s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.0004696846008300781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.2838175296783447s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.020577669143676758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.0007290840148925781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.0002052783966064453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cno took 2.5802481174468994s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Wheat trait took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Wheat trait took 0.0005025863647460938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Wheat trait took 0.2904369831085205s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Wheat trait took 0.020287513732910156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Wheat trait took 8.344650268554688e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Wheat trait took 0.0006952285766601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Wheat trait took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Wheat trait took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-co_wheat took 2.6770081520080566s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cognitive Atlas took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cognitive Atlas took 0.0005011558532714844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cognitive Atlas took 0.2861745357513428s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cognitive Atlas took 0.020229101181030273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cognitive Atlas took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cognitive Atlas took 0.0007138252258300781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cognitive Atlas took 0.0003237724304199219s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cognitive Atlas took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cogat took 2.692615270614624s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.0005280971527099609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.2687835693359375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.020253896713256836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.0006923675537109375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.000766754150390625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cogpo took 2.6619694232940674s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Current Procedural Terminology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.00046634674072265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.25298380851745605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.020656108856201172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Current Procedural Terminology took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0006949901580810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0004024505615234375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Current Procedural Terminology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cpt took 2.648587465286255s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 6.771087646484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.00047135353088378906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.3468739986419678s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.02023482322692871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.0007054805755615234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.001737356185913086s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-csp took 3.1577932834625244s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for COSTART took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for COSTART took 0.0003349781036376953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for COSTART took 0.26990318298339844s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for COSTART took 0.020015239715576172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for COSTART took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for COSTART took 0.0006973743438720703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for COSTART took 0.0009784698486328125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for COSTART took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cst took 2.5770905017852783s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.0004734992980957031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.2696859836578369s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.020372867584228516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.0007197856903076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.0004916191101074219s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ctcae took 2.624324321746826s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0005283355712890625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.2611396312713623s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.020496368408203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0007300376892089844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0004467964172363281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ctx took 2.6020143032073975s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dendritic cell took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dendritic cell took 0.0005044937133789062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dendritic cell took 0.2574758529663086s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dendritic cell took 0.020473241806030273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dendritic cell took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dendritic cell took 0.000705718994140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dendritic cell took 0.0002853870391845703s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dendritic cell took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-dc_cl took 2.6013870239257812s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.0004665851593017578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.26395750045776367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.020210742950439453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.0006988048553466797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 8.511543273925781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ddanat took 2.6374549865722656s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.00048065185546875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.2686758041381836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.020305871963500977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.0007262229919433594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.0009362697601318359s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ddi took 2.604515552520752s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Diagnostic Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.00047516822814941406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.26842832565307617s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.0204317569732666s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Diagnostic Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.0007398128509521484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Diagnostic Ontology took 8.368492126464844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Diagnostic Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-diagnosticont took 2.685946464538574s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.0004649162292480469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.2594480514526367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.020355939865112305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.0007233619689941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.00015616416931152344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-dikb-evidence took 2.677136182785034s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human disease ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human disease ontology took 0.00024771690368652344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human disease ontology took 0.2583045959472656s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human disease ontology took 0.0207064151763916s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human disease ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human disease ontology took 0.0007021427154541016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human disease ontology took 0.0006337165832519531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human disease ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-doid took 2.54449200630188s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Electrocardiography Ontology took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.00048470497131347656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.24609661102294922s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.020737886428833008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Electrocardiography Ontology took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.00086212158203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.0008645057678222656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Electrocardiography Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ecg took 2.6616194248199463s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Evidence codes took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Evidence codes took 0.0005323886871337891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Evidence codes took 0.2814147472381592s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Evidence codes took 0.020430803298950195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Evidence codes took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Evidence codes took 0.0007207393646240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Evidence codes took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Evidence codes took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-eco took 2.6326706409454346s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Experimental Factor Ontology took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.00042057037353515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.3045485019683838s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.02042531967163086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Experimental Factor Ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.0006940364837646484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.0016663074493408203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Experimental Factor Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-efo took 3.001364231109619s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0004668235778808594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.2749149799346924s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0214388370513916s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0007371902465820312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0012214183807373047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehda took 2.6048941612243652s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0002448558807373047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.26828479766845703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.020467519760131836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0006909370422363281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0007152557373046875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehdaa took 2.5901472568511963s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0003311634063720703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.27593445777893066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.020239591598510742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0006966590881347656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0005135536193847656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehdaa2 took 2.6658289432525635s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.00046515464782714844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.26413679122924805s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.02042412757873535s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.0007131099700927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-emap took 2.7361066341400146s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Environment Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Environment Ontology took 0.000476837158203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Environment Ontology took 0.2728133201599121s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Environment Ontology took 0.02061772346496582s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Environment Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Environment Ontology took 0.0007009506225585938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Environment Ontology took 0.0004024505615234375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Environment Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-envo took 2.648143768310547s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant environmental conditions took 5.078315734863281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant environmental conditions took 0.0004596710205078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant environmental conditions took 0.2756328582763672s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant environmental conditions took 0.020070791244506836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant environmental conditions took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant environmental conditions took 0.0006916522979736328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant environmental conditions took 0.00028014183044433594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant environmental conditions took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-eo took 2.6225876808166504s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.00046825408935546875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.26262831687927246s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.020353317260742188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.0007245540618896484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.001190185546875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ep took 2.7068958282470703s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Epilepsy took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Epilepsy took 0.0004665851593017578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Epilepsy took 0.2923123836517334s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Epilepsy took 0.02016425132751465s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Epilepsy took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Epilepsy took 0.0007047653198242188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Epilepsy took 0.00013065338134765625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Epilepsy took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-epileponto took 2.723731517791748s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for eagle-i research resource ontology took 8.630752563476562e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.0005159378051757812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.2672853469848633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.020342111587524414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for eagle-i research resource ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.000698089599609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.0011496543884277344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for eagle-i research resource ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ero took 2.71022367477417s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0004699230194091797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.24793577194213867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.020333528518676758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0007135868072509766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0011258125305175781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ev took 2.7274158000946045s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ExO took 5.030632019042969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ExO took 0.0004611015319824219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ExO took 0.2705104351043701s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ExO took 0.02062368392944336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ExO took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ExO took 0.0007355213165283203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ExO took 0.00024080276489257812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ExO took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-exo took 2.6803829669952393s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fungal gross anatomy took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.0004673004150390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.2851219177246094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.020531654357910156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fungal gross anatomy took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.0007109642028808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.00010585784912109375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fungal gross anatomy took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fao took 2.5940208435058594s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biological imaging methods took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biological imaging methods took 0.0004966259002685547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biological imaging methods took 0.2592005729675293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biological imaging methods took 0.020305633544921875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biological imaging methods took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biological imaging methods took 0.0006868839263916016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biological imaging methods took 0.00018167495727539062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biological imaging methods took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbbi took 2.6369974613189697s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Drosophila gross anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.0004754066467285156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.25895023345947266s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.020562410354614258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Drosophila gross anatomy took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.0007009506225585938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.0006384849548339844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Drosophila gross anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbbt took 2.6730175018310547s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.0004668235778808594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.2674591541290283s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.020528078079223633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.00072479248046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.0004107952117919922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbcv took 2.6108062267303467s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Drosophila development took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Drosophila development took 0.0005297660827636719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Drosophila development took 0.2786710262298584s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Drosophila development took 0.020357608795166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Drosophila development took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Drosophila development took 0.0007143020629882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Drosophila development took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Drosophila development took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbdv took 2.689446210861206s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fly taxonomy took 5.793571472167969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fly taxonomy took 0.0004858970642089844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fly taxonomy took 0.2888665199279785s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fly taxonomy took 0.020233631134033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fly taxonomy took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fly taxonomy took 0.0007100105285644531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fly taxonomy took 0.0003604888916015625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fly taxonomy took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbsp took 2.635272264480591s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0005137920379638672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.27635931968688965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.020685911178588867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0007181167602539062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.00024127960205078125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fda-meddevice took 2.6325185298919678s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Family Health History Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Family Health History Ontology took 0.0005276203155517578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Family Health History Ontology took 0.2581288814544678s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Family Health History Ontology took 0.020638704299926758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Family Health History Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Family Health History Ontology took 0.0007016658782958984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Family Health History Ontology took 0.0004055500030517578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Family Health History Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fhho took 2.6311445236206055s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Influenza Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Influenza Ontology took 0.0004973411560058594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Influenza Ontology took 0.2618880271911621s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Influenza Ontology took 0.021065473556518555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Influenza Ontology took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Influenza Ontology took 0.0008213520050048828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Influenza Ontology took 0.0011267662048339844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Influenza Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-flu took 2.6152141094207764s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 7.62939453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.0005147457122802734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.2664215564727783s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.020880460739135742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.0006988048553466797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 6.532669067382812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fma took 2.679979085922241s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.0005033016204833984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.28597331047058105s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.02035236358642578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.0007004737854003906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.00012731552124023438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fypo took 2.6992874145507812s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for GeoSpecies Ontology took 8.678436279296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.0005030632019042969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.289034366607666s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.02085709571838379s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for GeoSpecies Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.0007228851318359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.00010037422180175781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for GeoSpecies Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-geospecies took 2.6877009868621826s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for General Formal Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for General Formal Ontology took 0.000606536865234375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for General Formal Ontology took 0.2761266231536865s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for General Formal Ontology took 0.020478248596191406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for General Formal Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for General Formal Ontology took 0.0007109642028808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for General Formal Ontology took 0.00015997886657714844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for General Formal Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gfo took 2.6261725425720215s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.00047850608825683594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.2795443534851074s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.02054762840270996s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 2.002716064453125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0007069110870361328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0006005764007568359s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gfo-bio took 2.66165828704834s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Ontology Extension took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0005195140838623047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.262584924697876s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.020398616790771484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Ontology Extension took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0007112026214599609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0008339881896972656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Ontology Extension took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-go_x1 took 2.628798246383667s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Ontology took 0.00047516822814941406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Ontology took 0.2812368869781494s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Ontology took 0.02028679847717285s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Ontology took 0.0006935596466064453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Ontology took 0.0008249282836914062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-go_x2 took 2.6522257328033447s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cereal Plant Development took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cereal Plant Development took 0.0008940696716308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cereal Plant Development took 0.27887487411499023s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cereal Plant Development took 0.020693540573120117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cereal Plant Development took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cereal Plant Development took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cereal Plant Development took 3.218650817871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cereal Plant Development took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro took 2.681065797805786s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 4.673004150390625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.0005278587341308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.2701268196105957s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.020531654357910156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.0008018016815185547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.00042510032653808594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro_x1 took 2.7114675045013428s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0005133152008056641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.27737998962402344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.02071213722229004s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Regulation Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007107257843017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007135868072509766s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Regulation Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro_x2 took 2.704562187194824s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0004885196685791016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.2780797481536865s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0203859806060791s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0007157325744628906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0005671977996826172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hao took 2.658337116241455s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HCPCS took 5.459785461425781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HCPCS took 0.0009019374847412109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HCPCS took 0.30875635147094727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HCPCS took 0.02117323875427246s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HCPCS took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HCPCS took 0.0008156299591064453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HCPCS took 0.00026416778564453125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HCPCS took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hcpcs took 2.689885139465332s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Health Level Seven took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Health Level Seven took 0.0004792213439941406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Health Level Seven took 0.28778648376464844s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Health Level Seven took 0.020578622817993164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Health Level Seven took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Health Level Seven took 0.0007340908050537109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Health Level Seven took 0.0012595653533935547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Health Level Seven took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hl7 took 2.6824965476989746s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.0005636215209960938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.25029635429382324s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.020514488220214844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.0007307529449462891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.0003883838653564453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hlth_indics took 2.625239133834839s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.00048351287841796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.2786993980407715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.02066969871520996s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.0006999969482421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 3.24249267578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hom took 2.5910556316375732s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HOM-HARVARD took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HOM-HARVARD took 0.0005006790161132812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HOM-HARVARD took 0.27936434745788574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HOM-HARVARD took 0.020646095275878906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HOM-HARVARD took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HOM-HARVARD took 0.0006997585296630859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HOM-HARVARD took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HOM-HARVARD took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hom_harvard took 2.657095432281494s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human Phenotype Ontology took 5.364418029785156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0004642009735107422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.28817152976989746s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.020650148391723633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human Phenotype Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0006940364837646484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0006253719329833984s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human Phenotype Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hp_x1 took 2.6860060691833496s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.0006422996520996094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.2720928192138672s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.024776935577392578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 1.7404556274414062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.0013322830200195312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.001283407211303711s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hpio took 2.6700751781463623s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HUGO took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HUGO took 0.0005557537078857422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HUGO took 0.2820909023284912s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HUGO took 0.025058984756469727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HUGO took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HUGO took 0.0012521743774414062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HUGO took 0.00011301040649414062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HUGO took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hugo took 2.6230413913726807s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Information Artifact Ontology took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.00061798095703125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.2526063919067383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.024310588836669922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Information Artifact Ontology took 1.8835067749023438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.001199483871459961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.0008139610290527344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Information Artifact Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-iao took 2.6523566246032715s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD10 took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD10 took 0.0004982948303222656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD10 took 0.25979089736938477s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD10 took 0.020755529403686523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD10 took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD10 took 0.0007205009460449219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD10 took 0.0008053779602050781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD10 took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10 took 2.634382963180542s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD10CM took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD10CM took 0.0010776519775390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD10CM took 0.276275634765625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD10CM took 0.020773649215698242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD10CM took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD10CM took 0.0007085800170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD10CM took 0.0006096363067626953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD10CM took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10cm took 2.6358938217163086s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD-10-PCS took 5.340576171875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD-10-PCS took 0.0005729198455810547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD-10-PCS took 0.26192617416381836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD-10-PCS took 0.020663738250732422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD-10-PCS took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD-10-PCS took 0.0006997585296630859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD-10-PCS took 0.00015234947204589844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD-10-PCS took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10pcs took 2.5874507427215576s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Diseases took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0005106925964355469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Diseases took 0.27454590797424316s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Diseases took 0.020436763763427734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Diseases took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0007224082946777344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0006146430969238281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Diseases took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd9cm took 2.6892683506011963s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 7.390975952148438e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0004680156707763672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.2648749351501465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.020665884017944336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0007016658782958984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0004706382751464844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icf_x1 took 2.6364128589630127s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0005128383636474609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.291778564453125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.020916223526000977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0006928443908691406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0012085437774658203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icnp took 2.7070155143737793s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Primary Care took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.0004930496215820312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.25145840644836426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.02047443389892578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Primary Care took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.0006971359252929688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.00044035911560058594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Primary Care took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icpc took 2.618060827255249s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICPC-2 PLUS took 6.937980651855469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.00048804283142089844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.2814302444458008s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.02060723304748535s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICPC-2 PLUS took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0008552074432373047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICPC-2 PLUS took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icpc2p took 2.630103826522827s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICPS Network took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICPS Network took 0.0005192756652832031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICPS Network took 0.26007723808288574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICPS Network took 0.020900249481201172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICPS Network took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICPS Network took 0.0007050037384033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICPS Network took 0.00021314620971679688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICPS Network took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icps took 2.6778736114501953s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Infectious Disease Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.00046133995056152344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.2715322971343994s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.020599842071533203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Infectious Disease Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0007035732269287109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0008096694946289062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Infectious Disease Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ido took 2.651841878890991s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brucellosis Ontology took 7.653236389160156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.00048160552978515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.26674532890319824s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.020754098892211914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brucellosis Ontology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0007741451263427734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0011570453643798828s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brucellosis Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-idobru took 2.644235849380493s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Malaria Ontology took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Malaria Ontology took 0.0006115436553955078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Malaria Ontology took 0.2649221420288086s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Malaria Ontology took 0.025496244430541992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Malaria Ontology took 1.7881393432617188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Malaria Ontology took 0.0012316703796386719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Malaria Ontology took 0.001512289047241211s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Malaria Ontology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-idomal took 2.6853036880493164s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.0006017684936523438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.28158020973205566s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.02535724639892578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.001215219497680664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.0004000663757324219s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-iev took 2.6935553550720215s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.000453948974609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.27321577072143555s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.020427227020263672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.0006878376007080078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.0001430511474609375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-imgt took 2.764904022216797s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0004940032958984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.2842557430267334s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.02053093910217285s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0007150173187255859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0005216598510742188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-imr took 2.5618059635162354s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Interaction Network Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0004975795745849609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.2595794200897217s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.020622730255126953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Interaction Network Ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0007085800170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.000743865966796875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Interaction Network Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ino took 2.694645643234253s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Hewan Invertebrata took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.0005042552947998047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.2738759517669678s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.020494937896728516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Hewan Invertebrata took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.0006923675537109375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Hewan Invertebrata took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Hewan Invertebrata took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-invertebrata took 2.6993825435638428s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for IxnO took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for IxnO took 0.0002601146697998047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for IxnO took 0.2637307643890381s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for IxnO took 0.020712852478027344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for IxnO took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for IxnO took 0.0007081031799316406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for IxnO took 0.0001919269561767578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for IxnO took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ixno took 2.640836715698242s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SysMO-JERM took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SysMO-JERM took 0.0005059242248535156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SysMO-JERM took 0.3019382953643799s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SysMO-JERM took 0.02031564712524414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SysMO-JERM took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SysMO-JERM took 0.0007126331329345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SysMO-JERM took 0.00040650367736816406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SysMO-JERM took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-jerm took 2.701098918914795s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 5.698204040527344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.0005052089691162109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.26798152923583984s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.020418405532836914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.0006935596466064453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-kisao took 2.669349431991577s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Loggerhead nesting took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Loggerhead nesting took 0.0002651214599609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Loggerhead nesting took 0.2613668441772461s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Loggerhead nesting took 0.02061176300048828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Loggerhead nesting took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Loggerhead nesting took 0.0007255077362060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Loggerhead nesting took 0.00019621849060058594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Loggerhead nesting took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lhn took 2.582496166229248s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Lipid Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Lipid Ontology took 0.00054168701171875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Lipid Ontology took 0.26373887062072754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Lipid Ontology took 0.020153045654296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Lipid Ontology took 1.7881393432617188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Lipid Ontology took 0.0006916522979736328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Lipid Ontology took 0.00019121170043945312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Lipid Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lipro took 2.6230673789978027s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.00047898292541503906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.31120848655700684s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.020612001419067383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0007016658782958984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0017886161804199219s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lnc took 3.1198318004608154s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.0005984306335449219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.28989720344543457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.020641803741455078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.0006949901580810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.0006477832794189453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ma took 2.700272798538208s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Multiple alignment took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Multiple alignment took 0.0005209445953369141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Multiple alignment took 0.2798731327056885s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Multiple alignment took 0.020424604415893555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Multiple alignment took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Multiple alignment took 0.0007104873657226562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Multiple alignment took 0.00019240379333496094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Multiple alignment took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mao took 2.7012219429016113s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Minimal anatomical terminology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0004971027374267578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.2629883289337158s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.020284414291381836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Minimal anatomical terminology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0007243156433105469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0006842613220214844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Minimal anatomical terminology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mat took 2.61470103263855s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Breast tissue cell lines took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.0005011558532714844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.2780625820159912s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.020406723022460938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Breast tissue cell lines took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.000705718994140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.00041294097900390625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Breast tissue cell lines took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mcbcc took 2.668750047683716s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell line ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell line ontology took 0.0005176067352294922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell line ontology took 0.29680681228637695s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell line ontology took 0.02022719383239746s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell line ontology took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell line ontology took 0.0007016658782958984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell line ontology took 0.0007367134094238281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell line ontology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mccl took 2.7188990116119385s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell line ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell line ontology took 0.00025534629821777344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell line ontology took 0.2621901035308838s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell line ontology took 0.020819902420043945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell line ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell line ontology took 0.0006959438323974609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell line ontology took 0.0013897418975830078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell line ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mccl_x1 took 2.794174909591675s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.0004258155822753906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.26395750045776367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.02020406723022461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.0007061958312988281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.00023031234741210938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mcv took 2.5921969413757324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Master Drug Data Base took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Master Drug Data Base took 0.0004172325134277344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Master Drug Data Base took 0.2628364562988281s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Master Drug Data Base took 0.02010512351989746s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Master Drug Data Base took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Master Drug Data Base took 0.0007154941558837891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Master Drug Data Base took 0.00017309188842773438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Master Drug Data Base took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mddb took 2.611901044845581s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MedDRA took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MedDRA took 0.00045490264892578125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MedDRA took 0.26953125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MedDRA took 0.020157337188720703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MedDRA took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MedDRA took 0.0007069110870361328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MedDRA took 0.0011360645294189453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MedDRA took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mdr took 2.677497148513794s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0004706382751464844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.29056835174560547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.02068161964416504s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0007083415985107422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0008885860443115234s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-medlineplus took 2.6797029972076416s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MeGO took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MeGO took 0.0005052089691162109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MeGO took 0.27162766456604004s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MeGO took 0.021062612533569336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MeGO took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MeGO took 0.0007252693176269531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MeGO took 0.00014734268188476562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MeGO took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mego took 2.6541097164154053s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0005550384521484375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.31206822395324707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.02056717872619629s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0007312297821044922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0018312931060791016s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mesh-owl took 3.1076364517211914s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mental Functioning Ontology took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.00048351287841796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.28441572189331055s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.020485639572143555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mental Functioning Ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.0007166862487792969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.0005831718444824219s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mental Functioning Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mf took 2.6481685638427734s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.00024199485778808594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.2569096088409424s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.020626544952392578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0007178783416748047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0005524158477783203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mfo took 2.5754852294921875s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Emotion Ontology took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Emotion Ontology took 0.00043702125549316406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Emotion Ontology took 0.2554292678833008s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Emotion Ontology took 0.020569562911987305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Emotion Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Emotion Ontology took 0.0007395744323730469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Emotion Ontology took 0.0007345676422119141s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Emotion Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mfoem took 2.527291774749756s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.00022745132446289062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.27596426010131836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.020355939865112305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.0007114410400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.0001010894775390625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mhc took 2.558964967727661s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Protein-protein interaction took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Protein-protein interaction took 0.00039649009704589844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Protein-protein interaction took 0.2678182125091553s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Protein-protein interaction took 0.02103567123413086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Protein-protein interaction took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0007205009460449219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0006728172302246094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Protein-protein interaction took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mi took 2.56007719039917s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0005235671997070312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.29360008239746094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.020535945892333984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0007672309875488281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0006921291351318359s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-miro took 2.6251943111419678s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Measurement Method Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.0004703998565673828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.289107084274292s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.02061629295349121s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Measurement Method Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.0007011890411376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.000141143798828125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Measurement Method Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mmo took 2.684126138687134s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MGED Ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MGED Ontology took 0.0005757808685302734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MGED Ontology took 0.286175012588501s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MGED Ontology took 0.020650625228881836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MGED Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MGED Ontology took 0.0007109642028808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MGED Ontology took 0.00038886070251464844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MGED Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mo took 2.723936080932617s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Protein modification took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Protein modification took 0.0005424022674560547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Protein modification took 0.2763810157775879s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Protein modification took 0.020824670791625977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Protein modification took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Protein modification took 0.0007092952728271484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Protein modification took 0.000217437744140625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Protein modification took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mod took 2.612907886505127s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mammalian phenotype took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mammalian phenotype took 0.00026154518127441406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mammalian phenotype took 0.257183313369751s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mammalian phenotype took 0.02076888084411621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mammalian phenotype took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0006871223449707031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mammalian phenotype took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mp took 2.606755256652832s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse pathology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse pathology took 0.00042438507080078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse pathology took 0.27161288261413574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse pathology took 0.02081608772277832s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse pathology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse pathology took 0.0007367134094238281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse pathology took 0.0005519390106201172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse pathology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mpath took 2.588660717010498s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mass spectrometry took 6.246566772460938e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mass spectrometry took 0.0004658699035644531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mass spectrometry took 0.28009867668151855s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mass spectrometry took 0.020462751388549805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mass spectrometry took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mass spectrometry took 0.0007197856903076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mass spectrometry took 0.00034809112548828125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mass spectrometry took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ms took 2.5935394763946533s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Medical Subject Headings took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0005009174346923828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Medical Subject Headings took 0.3259923458099365s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Medical Subject Headings took 0.020926713943481445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Medical Subject Headings took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0006871223449707031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0018584728240966797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Medical Subject Headings took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-msh took 3.168684482574463s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 5.984306335449219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.00048065185546875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.2832913398742676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.020690202713012695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.0007114410400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.0001766681671142578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mthch took 2.610363721847534s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Natural Products Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0004742145538330078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Natural Products Ontology took 0.25490403175354004s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0203859806060791s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Natural Products Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0007197856903076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0007712841033935547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Natural Products Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-natpro took 2.7034339904785156s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NCBI organismal classification took 4.8160552978515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NCBI organismal classification took 0.00047659873962402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NCBI organismal classification took 0.25067687034606934s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NCBI organismal classification took 0.020809412002563477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NCBI organismal classification took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NCBI organismal classification took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NCBI organismal classification took 0.0007975101470947266s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NCBI organismal classification took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ncbitaxon took 2.6829121112823486s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NCI Thesaurus took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NCI Thesaurus took 0.0004649162292480469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NCI Thesaurus took 0.3079965114593506s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NCI Thesaurus took 0.02109360694885254s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NCI Thesaurus took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NCI Thesaurus took 0.0006997585296630859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NCI Thesaurus took 0.0019550323486328125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NCI Thesaurus took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ncit took 3.1093409061431885s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for National Drug Data File took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for National Drug Data File took 0.0004658699035644531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for National Drug Data File took 0.2663435935974121s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for National Drug Data File took 0.020658254623413086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for National Drug Data File took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for National Drug Data File took 0.0006973743438720703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for National Drug Data File took 0.0006306171417236328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for National Drug Data File took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nddf took 2.6619510650634766s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for National Drug File took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for National Drug File took 0.0004563331604003906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for National Drug File took 0.2630743980407715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for National Drug File took 0.020697593688964844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for National Drug File took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for National Drug File took 0.0007045269012451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for National Drug File took 0.0012066364288330078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for National Drug File took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ndfrt took 2.6260182857513428s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.00051116943359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.2748405933380127s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.021030187606811523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.000820159912109375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.0011386871337890625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nemo_x1 took 2.721541404724121s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0011456012725830078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.2520771026611328s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.02086472511291504s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0006661415100097656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-neomark took 2.6624159812927246s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.0006923675537109375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.27261829376220703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.020773887634277344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.0007092952728271484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.0001285076141357422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-neomarkontology took 2.7137019634246826s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIFSTD took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIFSTD took 0.0005738735198974609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIFSTD took 0.32802796363830566s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIFSTD took 0.020619869232177734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIFSTD took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIFSTD took 0.0007345676422119141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIFSTD took 0.0019407272338867188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIFSTD took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif took 3.116909980773926s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIF Cell took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIF Cell took 0.0005056858062744141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIF Cell took 0.2881045341491699s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIF Cell took 0.020701169967651367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIF Cell took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIF Cell took 0.0006961822509765625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIF Cell took 0.0012946128845214844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIF Cell took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif_cell took 2.6303646564483643s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIF Dysfunction took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIF Dysfunction took 0.0004820823669433594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIF Dysfunction took 0.2579653263092041s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIF Dysfunction took 0.02064371109008789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIF Dysfunction took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIF Dysfunction took 0.0007069110870361328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIF Dysfunction took 0.0013728141784667969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIF Dysfunction took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif_dysfunction took 2.625922679901123s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 8.249282836914062e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.00064849853515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.27908754348754883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.020765304565429688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0007102489471435547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0005335807800292969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nigo took 2.6732254028320312s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 5.53131103515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0004930496215820312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.2712850570678711s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.020532608032226562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0007090568542480469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0005338191986083984s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nmr took 2.6724870204925537s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.0005517005920410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.29177093505859375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.02216935157775879s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.0007042884826660156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.00011682510375976562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nonrctontology took 2.739312171936035s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NanoParticle Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.0005776882171630859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.2638130187988281s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.02077627182006836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NanoParticle Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.000762939453125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.001155853271484375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NanoParticle Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-npo took 2.6926021575927734s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0005028247833251953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.2610971927642822s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.02080535888671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0007085800170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0007555484771728516s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oae took 2.6416006088256836s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0004894733428955078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.2616536617279053s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.020802974700927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0007219314575195312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.001447916030883789s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-obi took 2.593505620956421s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for OBOE took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for OBOE took 0.00048041343688964844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for OBOE took 0.27312612533569336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for OBOE took 0.02069234848022461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for OBOE took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for OBOE took 0.0006978511810302734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for OBOE took 0.00011110305786132812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for OBOE took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oboe took 2.5852482318878174s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for OBOE SBC took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for OBOE SBC took 0.0004582405090332031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for OBOE SBC took 0.2480015754699707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for OBOE SBC took 0.02066326141357422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for OBOE SBC took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for OBOE SBC took 0.0006945133209228516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for OBOE SBC took 0.0007624626159667969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for OBOE SBC took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oboe-sbc took 2.6785950660705566s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.000530242919921875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.27336597442626953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.020726919174194336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0006947517395019531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0005650520324707031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ocre took 2.6762893199920654s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0005283355712890625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.24985647201538086s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.02055072784423828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0008318424224853516s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-odgi took 2.5992825031280518s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 7.486343383789062e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0004878044128417969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.2809131145477295s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.02085089683532715s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0008480548858642578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogi took 2.609511375427246s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.00047898292541503906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.2612435817718506s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.02080059051513672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.0006968975067138672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.0002810955047607422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogmd took 2.7080018520355225s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for General Medical Science took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0003724098205566406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.2722346782684326s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.021066665649414062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for General Medical Science took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0008761882781982422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0008084774017333984s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for General Medical Science took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogms took 2.638181686401367s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0004832744598388672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.26511645317077637s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.020762205123901367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0007474422454833984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0012121200561523438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omim took 2.675295352935791s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.00048828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.2722585201263428s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.02091360092163086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.0006971359252929688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.0003597736358642578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omit took 2.5760114192962646s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.00024080276489257812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.2701995372772217s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.02077317237854004s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.0006940364837646484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.0005667209625244141s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omrse took 2.409334897994995s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Data Mining took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.0005052089691162109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.2701129913330078s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.02034783363342285s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Data Mining took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.0006952285766601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.0008060932159423828s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Data Mining took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontodm took 2.674281597137451s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.0005838871002197266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.27638936042785645s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.020513534545898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.0007040500640869141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.000240325927734375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontodt took 2.6472408771514893s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0004572868347167969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.2588777542114258s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.020595312118530273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0007047653198242188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0005865097045898438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontoorpha took 2.6631789207458496s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 8.034706115722656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0004730224609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.2768094539642334s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.020916461944580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0006992816925048828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0008687973022460938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-opl took 2.6787619590759277s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Phenotypic quality took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Phenotypic quality took 0.0005016326904296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Phenotypic quality took 0.25817251205444336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Phenotypic quality took 0.020586013793945312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Phenotypic quality took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Phenotypic quality took 0.0006949901580810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Phenotypic quality took 0.0008413791656494141s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Phenotypic quality took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pato took 2.5613677501678467s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physician Data Query took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physician Data Query took 0.0004780292510986328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physician Data Query took 0.2755110263824463s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physician Data Query took 0.020696640014648438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physician Data Query took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physician Data Query took 0.0006985664367675781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physician Data Query took 0.0007939338684082031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physician Data Query took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pdq took 2.71355938911438s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Pediatric Terminology took 5.7697296142578125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0005629062652587891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Pediatric Terminology took 0.2921326160430908s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Pediatric Terminology took 0.02091813087463379s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Pediatric Terminology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0006973743438720703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0007901191711425781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Pediatric Terminology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pedterm took 2.6699323654174805s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.000537872314453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.2794811725616455s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.02048182487487793s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.0006921291351318359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.00018978118896484375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-peo took 2.797694206237793s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PHARE took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PHARE took 0.0005755424499511719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PHARE took 0.26054835319519043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PHARE took 0.020400524139404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PHARE took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PHARE took 0.0007212162017822266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PHARE took 0.0006248950958251953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PHARE took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-phare took 2.6921586990356445s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PKO_Re took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PKO_Re took 0.0005068778991699219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PKO_Re took 0.2589528560638428s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PKO_Re took 0.02076578140258789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PKO_Re took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PKO_Re took 0.0007078647613525391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PKO_Re took 0.00017833709716796875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PKO_Re took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pko took 2.636439800262451s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PMA 2010 took 5.412101745605469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PMA 2010 took 0.0005018711090087891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PMA 2010 took 0.26639246940612793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PMA 2010 took 0.02065896987915039s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PMA 2010 took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PMA 2010 took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PMA 2010 took 0.0010304450988769531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PMA 2010 took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pma took 2.6629743576049805s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.0005075931549072266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.2671244144439697s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.020616531372070312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.00016236305236816406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pmr took 2.669329881668091s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Anatomy took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Anatomy took 0.0005338191986083984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Anatomy took 0.27138757705688477s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Anatomy took 0.020550251007080078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Anatomy took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Anatomy took 0.0006949901580810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Anatomy took 0.0004019737243652344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Anatomy took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po took 2.6391849517822266s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.001249074935913086s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.26125669479370117s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.020511865615844727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.0007078647613525391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 7.009506225585938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po_x1 took 2.6113009452819824s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Ontology took 0.0005025863647460938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Ontology took 0.26084089279174805s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Ontology took 0.02038431167602539s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Ontology took 0.0007994174957275391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Ontology took 0.00043654441833496094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po_x2 took 2.608086585998535s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 5.245208740234375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.000453948974609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.2704465389251709s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.020543575286865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0007073879241943359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0006461143493652344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pr took 2.6901087760925293s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Proteomics data and process provenance took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.0005054473876953125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.2647128105163574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.02084970474243164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Proteomics data and process provenance took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.0007009506225585938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.0002551078796386719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Proteomics data and process provenance took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-propreo took 2.688877582550049s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Pathway ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Pathway ontology took 0.00048542022705078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Pathway ontology took 0.2856130599975586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Pathway ontology took 0.020626068115234375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Pathway ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Pathway ontology took 0.0008397102355957031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Pathway ontology took 0.00012803077697753906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Pathway ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pw took 2.6274778842926025s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.0005311965942382812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.27211904525756836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.020673513412475586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.0007181167602539062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-qibo took 2.627185821533203s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.0005059242248535156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.3149416446685791s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.020695209503173828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.0007412433624267578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.0017445087432861328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rcd took 3.169903516769409s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 5.6743621826171875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.0004928112030029297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.29030323028564453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.02079296112060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.0006911754608154297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.0001327991485595703s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rctontology took 2.700174331665039s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.0004718303680419922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.26868343353271484s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.020409107208251953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.0007245540618896484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 9.393692016601562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-repo took 2.714728355407715s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physico-chemical process took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physico-chemical process took 0.0010693073272705078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physico-chemical process took 0.2677323818206787s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physico-chemical process took 0.020547866821289062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physico-chemical process took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physico-chemical process took 0.0007128715515136719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physico-chemical process took 0.00018715858459472656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physico-chemical process took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rex took 2.6913087368011475s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RadLex took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RadLex took 0.0004975795745849609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RadLex took 0.2771186828613281s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RadLex took 0.020728349685668945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RadLex took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RadLex took 0.0007026195526123047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RadLex took 0.0014998912811279297s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RadLex took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rid took 2.6687045097351074s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RNA ontology took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RNA ontology took 0.0005164146423339844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RNA ontology took 0.2728884220123291s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RNA ontology took 0.020458459854125977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RNA ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RNA ontology took 0.0006997585296630859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RNA ontology took 0.0005304813385009766s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RNA ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rnao took 2.606077194213867s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Role Ontology took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Role Ontology took 0.0004913806915283203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Role Ontology took 0.26483941078186035s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Role Ontology took 0.02012014389038086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Role Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Role Ontology took 0.0007870197296142578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Role Ontology took 0.0001881122589111328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Role Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-roleo took 2.630878210067749s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Rat Strain Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.0005021095275878906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.2628958225250244s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.020465612411499023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Rat Strain Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.0007159709930419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.00017547607421875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Rat Strain Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rs took 2.6093525886535645s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RxNORM took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RxNORM took 0.0004856586456298828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RxNORM took 0.3048419952392578s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RxNORM took 0.020038366317749023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RxNORM took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RxNORM took 0.0007073879241943359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RxNORM took 0.0007138252258300781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RxNORM took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rxnorm took 2.727034330368042s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.00047779083251953125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.2701749801635742s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.020343303680419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0007278919219970703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0010440349578857422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sao took 2.648313283920288s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Systems Biology took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Systems Biology took 0.0004723072052001953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Systems Biology took 0.2785968780517578s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Systems Biology took 0.020516157150268555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Systems Biology took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Systems Biology took 0.000698089599609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Systems Biology took 0.000431060791015625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Systems Biology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sbo took 2.626467227935791s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.0005159378051757812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.276322603225708s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.020375490188598633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.0006906986236572266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 9.894371032714844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sbro took 2.6192331314086914s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sleep Domain Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.000476837158203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.25649428367614746s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.02039647102355957s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sleep Domain Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.0007030963897705078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.0013096332550048828s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sleep Domain Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sdo took 2.629749059677124s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sample processing and separation techniques took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.0004897117614746094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.291717529296875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.020552396774291992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sample processing and separation techniques took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.0007405281066894531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.00032901763916015625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sample processing and separation techniques took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sep took 2.6855580806732178s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Student Health Record took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Student Health Record took 0.0004124641418457031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Student Health Record took 0.2557497024536133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Student Health Record took 0.020359277725219727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Student Health Record took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Student Health Record took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Student Health Record took 0.00043582916259765625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Student Health Record took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-shr took 2.6117875576019287s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0014777183532714844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.26282715797424316s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.020427227020263672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0007388591766357422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0011968612670898438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sio took 3.9054713249206543s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Situation-Based Access Control took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.0005576610565185547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.27559781074523926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.020385026931762695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Situation-Based Access Control took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.0007085800170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.0001952648162841797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Situation-Based Access Control took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sitbac took 2.589777946472168s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 5.8650970458984375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.00048232078552246094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.3133699893951416s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.020592212677001953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.000701904296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.0019321441650390625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-snomedct took 3.181443214416504s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SNP-Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SNP-Ontology took 0.0004878044128417969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SNP-Ontology took 0.2551696300506592s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SNP-Ontology took 0.020251035690307617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SNP-Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SNP-Ontology took 0.000705718994140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SNP-Ontology took 0.0006518363952636719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SNP-Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-snpo took 2.6783103942871094s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sequence types and features took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sequence types and features took 0.0004992485046386719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sequence types and features took 0.3027458190917969s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sequence types and features took 0.020242929458618164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sequence types and features took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sequence types and features took 0.0006933212280273438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sequence types and features took 0.0005466938018798828s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sequence types and features took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-so_x1 took 2.7259395122528076s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0002722740173339844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.2876100540161133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.02078723907470703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0007007122039794922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0015711784362792969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 3.814697265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sopharm took 3.056013584136963s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SoyOntology took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SoyOntology took 0.0004966259002685547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SoyOntology took 0.2661137580871582s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SoyOntology took 0.0205843448638916s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SoyOntology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SoyOntology took 0.0007321834564208984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SoyOntology took 0.0001270771026611328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SoyOntology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-soy took 2.636936664581299s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Spider Ontology took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Spider Ontology took 0.00023055076599121094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Spider Ontology took 0.2578918933868408s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Spider Ontology took 0.020172595977783203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Spider Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Spider Ontology took 0.0006947517395019531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Spider Ontology took 0.00031638145446777344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Spider Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-spd took 2.5543107986450195s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.0005502700805664062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.2760734558105469s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.020384550094604492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.000728607177734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.000270843505859375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-spto took 2.743018865585327s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.0005106925964355469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.2974069118499756s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.020269393920898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 1.9550323486328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.0007009506225585938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.00043487548828125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sso took 2.6970479488372803s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Software Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Software Ontology took 0.00047278404235839844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Software Ontology took 0.2911367416381836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Software Ontology took 0.02019476890563965s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Software Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Software Ontology took 0.0007035732269287109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Software Ontology took 0.0003864765167236328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Software Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-swo took 2.685443162918091s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Tick gross anatomy took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Tick gross anatomy took 0.0005323886871337891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Tick gross anatomy took 0.2669095993041992s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Tick gross anatomy took 0.020510435104370117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Tick gross anatomy took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Tick gross anatomy took 0.0007078647613525391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Tick gross anatomy took 0.00023698806762695312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Tick gross anatomy took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tads took 2.6558480262756348s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 5.173683166503906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.000507354736328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.2607874870300293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.020493030548095703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.0007152557373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.0008792877197265625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tao took 2.7087810039520264s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.00045752525329589844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.27745819091796875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.021242380142211914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.0009150505065917969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.00010323524475097656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-taxrank took 2.6510939598083496s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.0005116462707519531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.3027338981628418s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.020978450775146484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.0008420944213867188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 8.487701416015625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-teddy took 2.6565332412719727s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Time Event Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Time Event Ontology took 0.00047278404235839844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Time Event Ontology took 0.26980137825012207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Time Event Ontology took 0.02025437355041504s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Time Event Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Time Event Ontology took 0.0006992816925048828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Time Event Ontology took 0.0008077621459960938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Time Event Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-teo took 2.668384075164795s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mosquito gross anatomy took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0005156993865966797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.2887585163116455s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.020486116409301758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mosquito gross anatomy took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0007376670837402344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0003979206085205078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mosquito gross anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tgma took 2.7106103897094727s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for thesaurus took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for thesaurus took 0.0004711151123046875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for thesaurus took 0.264514684677124s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for thesaurus took 0.020493268966674805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for thesaurus took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for thesaurus took 0.0007257461547851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for thesaurus took 6.771087646484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for thesaurus took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-thesaurus took 2.7377679347991943s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.00047707557678222656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.29203271865844727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.020367145538330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.0007214546203613281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.00033974647521972656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tm-signs-and-sympts took 2.743359088897705s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Translational Medicine Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0005328655242919922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.28621768951416016s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.020146846771240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Translational Medicine Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0006895065307617188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0008273124694824219s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Translational Medicine Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tmo took 2.714310884475708s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Trait Ontology took 5.3882598876953125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.00047969818115234375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.2782297134399414s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.026275157928466797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Trait Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.0007147789001464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.00018477439880371094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Trait Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-to took 2.671853542327881s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for TOK_Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for TOK_Ontology took 0.0005042552947998047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for TOK_Ontology took 0.2666778564453125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for TOK_Ontology took 0.020120859146118164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for TOK_Ontology took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for TOK_Ontology took 0.0007226467132568359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for TOK_Ontology took 0.00018334388732910156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for TOK_Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tok took 2.605855941772461s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Teleost taxonomy took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Teleost taxonomy took 0.0004699230194091797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Teleost taxonomy took 0.2793455123901367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Teleost taxonomy took 0.02042698860168457s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Teleost taxonomy took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Teleost taxonomy took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Teleost taxonomy took 0.00019073486328125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Teleost taxonomy took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tto took 2.691521167755127s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Uber anatomy ontology took 7.557868957519531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.00048613548278808594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.2929563522338867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.020432472229003906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Uber anatomy ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.0006930828094482422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.0010123252868652344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Uber anatomy ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-uberon took 2.708702802658081s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Units Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Units Ontology took 0.0005278587341308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Units Ontology took 0.26505565643310547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Units Ontology took 0.020532608032226562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Units Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Units Ontology took 0.0007719993591308594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Units Ontology took 0.000244140625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Units Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-unitsontology took 2.718801498413086s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Units of measurement took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Units of measurement took 0.00027108192443847656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Units of measurement took 0.25240135192871094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Units of measurement took 0.020294666290283203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Units of measurement took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Units of measurement took 0.0007054805755615234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Units of measurement took 0.00028395652770996094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Units of measurement took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-uo took 2.66015887260437s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for VANDF took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for VANDF took 0.0004913806915283203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for VANDF took 0.26194024085998535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for VANDF took 0.0215909481048584s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for VANDF took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for VANDF took 0.0007617473602294922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for VANDF took 0.0007138252258300781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for VANDF took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vandf took 2.682314395904541s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.0005023479461669922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.2941124439239502s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.020838499069213867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.00044035911560058594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vao took 2.738112449645996s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0004990100860595703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.2700810432434082s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.02098870277404785s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0007157325744628906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0006361007690429688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vhog took 2.710880756378174s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for VIVO took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for VIVO took 0.0005402565002441406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for VIVO took 0.25515055656433105s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for VIVO took 0.0208127498626709s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for VIVO took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for VIVO took 0.0006971359252929688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for VIVO took 0.000339508056640625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for VIVO took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vivo took 2.6768062114715576s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vaccine Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0005509853363037109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vaccine Ontology took 0.2734956741333008s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vaccine Ontology took 0.020444869995117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vaccine Ontology took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0007030963897705078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0012464523315429688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vaccine Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vo took 2.669950485229492s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.0005235671997070312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.2628459930419922s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.020989418029785156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.0007395744323730469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.00020503997802734375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vt took 2.6680240631103516s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans gross anatomy took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0005154609680175781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.24887871742248535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.020438671112060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans gross anatomy took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0006961822509765625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0005514621734619141s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans gross anatomy took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbbt took 2.665426254272461s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans development took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans development took 0.0005362033843994141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans development took 0.2751638889312744s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans development took 0.020738840103149414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans development took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans development took 0.0007145404815673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans development took 4.744529724121094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans development took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbls took 2.6980929374694824s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans phenotype took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans phenotype took 0.0004687309265136719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans phenotype took 0.29192256927490234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans phenotype took 0.02040839195251465s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans phenotype took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans phenotype took 0.0006933212280273438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans phenotype took 8.511543273925781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans phenotype took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbphenotype took 2.714677095413208s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0004830360412597656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.24842143058776855s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.020108938217163086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0007157325744628906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0006256103515625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-who took 2.604079246520996s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Xenopus anatomy and development took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.00048613548278808594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.27983903884887695s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.02045154571533203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Xenopus anatomy and development took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0007066726684570312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0006799697875976562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Xenopus anatomy and development took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-xao took 2.70652437210083s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.0006749629974365234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.2953646183013916s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.02607870101928711s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 1.811981201171875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.0012545585632324219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.00031495094299316406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-xco took 2.7680397033691406s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Yeast phenotypes took 5.888938903808594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Yeast phenotypes took 0.0006546974182128906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Yeast phenotypes took 0.2617955207824707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Yeast phenotypes took 0.02521491050720215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Yeast phenotypes took 2.47955322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Yeast phenotypes took 0.0011980533599853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Yeast phenotypes took 0.0003452301025390625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Yeast phenotypes took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ypo took 2.6818389892578125s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0005660057067871094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.2755246162414551s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.025110960006713867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 2.0265579223632812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0012259483337402344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0009570121765136719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-zfa took 2.6303601264953613s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.0012333393096923828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.3060877323150635s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.024544715881347656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 1.811981201171875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.0011816024780273438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bioportal_link took 3.417466402053833s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioSamples RDF took 0.48456668853759766s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioSamples RDF took 0.0004684925079345703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioSamples RDF took 0.2705240249633789s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioSamples RDF took 0.025354623794555664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioSamples RDF took 2.5033950805664062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioSamples RDF took 0.0012333393096923828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioSamples RDF took 4.982948303222656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioSamples RDF took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biosamples-rdf took 3.6658895015716553s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.17197823524475098s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.0003871917724609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.26894664764404297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.020194053649902344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.0007121562957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.00011348724365234375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bis-linked-data took 2.6557388305664062s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bitzi took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bitzi took 0.0002593994140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bitzi took 0.27948856353759766s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bitzi took 0.02034449577331543s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bitzi took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bitzi took 0.0006897449493408203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bitzi took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bitzi took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bitzi took 3.011866569519043s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BizkaiSense took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BizkaiSense took 0.0003790855407714844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BizkaiSense took 0.28881168365478516s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BizkaiSense took 0.024674177169799805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BizkaiSense took 1.8835067749023438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BizkaiSense took 0.001268148422241211s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BizkaiSense took 5.054473876953125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BizkaiSense took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bizkaisense took 2.9571237564086914s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for blabla.itemlist took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for blabla.itemlist took 0.0002586841583251953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for blabla.itemlist took 0.24898004531860352s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for blabla.itemlist took 0.020478248596191406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for blabla.itemlist took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for blabla.itemlist took 0.0006916522979736328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for blabla.itemlist took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for blabla.itemlist took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for blabla-itemlist took 2.8718760013580322s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for blabla.itemlist took 5.2928924560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for blabla.itemlist took 0.00021791458129882812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for blabla.itemlist took 0.26401400566101074s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for blabla.itemlist took 0.02050614356994629s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for blabla.itemlist took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for blabla.itemlist took 0.0006992816925048828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for blabla.itemlist took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for blabla.itemlist took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for blabla_itemlist took 2.964703321456909s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.0006198883056640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.25748157501220703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.020421504974365234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.0007550716400146484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 3.886222839355469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bll-thesaurus took 3.7054033279418945s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 1.0054054260253906s
Availability | VoID file availability check for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.0006389617919921875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.2638082504272461s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.020369529724121094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.0006964206695556641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 6.461143493652344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bluk-bnb took 13.05904507637024s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.26882076263427734s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.0006358623504638672s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Thesaurus BNCF took 44.651883363723755s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.6260049343109131s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.6294598579406738s
Interoperability | New terms check for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.4773643016815186s
Versatility | Languages check for Thesaurus BNCF took 7.254465103149414s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.9100325107574463s
Security | Check HTTPS for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.09873008728027344s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12444639205932617s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.13219475746154785s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12677335739135742s
License | MR license check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12319421768188477s
License | HR license check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.20229554176330566s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12528324127197266s
Understandability | Number of label check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.2717416286468506s
Understandability | URI regex check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.25293636322021484s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12232327461242676s
Verifiability | Authors check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1259782314300537s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.13204073905944824s
Performance | Throughput check for Thesaurus BNCF took 10.732412576675415s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Thesaurus BNCF took 6.747245788574219e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1233675479888916s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12180209159851074s
Interlinking | skos check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.17783474922180176s
Interlinking | skos check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.14269280433654785s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.11999964714050293s
Currency | Creation date check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.2579994201660156s
Currency | Modification date check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.25635576248168945s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Thesaurus BNCF took 24.104862213134766s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Thesaurus BNCF took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.13005828857421875s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12334179878234863s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1680757999420166s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Thesaurus BNCF took 11.489581823348999s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.5064518451690674s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Thesaurus BNCF took 3.9924283027648926s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1412522792816162s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.8806300163269043s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Thesaurus BNCF took 6.930059432983398s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Thesaurus BNCF took 9.463328838348389s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.6269447803497314s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Thesaurus BNCF took 2.194965362548828s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Thesaurus BNCF took 2.4496076107025146s
Security | Sign check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12615036964416504s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Thesaurus BNCF took 17.308472156524658s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.36274123191833496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.020699739456176758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.0006916522979736328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Thesaurus BNCF took 6.866455078125e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Thesaurus BNCF took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bncf-ns took 181.73464679718018s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.5227081775665283s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.0006396770477294922s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 9.46434235572815s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 55.68822479248047s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 3.189404010772705s
Interoperability | New terms check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 4.276689529418945s
Versatility | Languages check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 74.19084167480469s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.5562050342559814s
Security | Check HTTPS for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.21556949615478516s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 10.119831800460815s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3753507137298584s
Availability | RDF dump link check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.39411258697509766s
License | MR license check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.5562465190887451s
License | HR license check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 60.19458532333374s
Amount of data | Number of property check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.6165196895599365s
Understandability | Number of label check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.6893672943115234s
Understandability | URI regex check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 4.143117427825928s
Understandability | Vocabs check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.059488534927368s
Verifiability | Authors check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.31249475479125977s
Verifiability | Publishers check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3160388469696045s
Performance | Throughput check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 110.38403105735779s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 8.082389831542969e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.33037614822387695s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.2988862991333008s
Interlinking | skos check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 16.376441478729248s
Interlinking | skos check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 15.39793610572815s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 30.262849807739258s
Currency | Creation date check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.6424427032470703s
Currency | Modification date check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 12.669117212295532s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 17.88853430747986s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.1457672119140625e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.27933382987976074s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.2941415309906006s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.2658500671386719s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.8944690227508545s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.02351975440979004s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.03066086769104004s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.2949504852294922s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 27.568098783493042s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 20.092308044433594s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.9111127853393555s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.075474977493286s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 42.259249210357666s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.03227066993713379s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 14.395541667938232s
Security | Sign check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 23.20472812652588s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 22.491081953048706s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.5543923377990723s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.024184226989746094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.0007605552673339844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 5.7220458984375e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bpr took 1454.232766866684s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brazilian Politicians took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brazilian Politicians took 0.0004987716674804688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brazilian Politicians took 0.270615816116333s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brazilian Politicians took 0.020635128021240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brazilian Politicians took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brazilian Politicians took 0.0007376670837402344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brazilian Politicians took 6.651878356933594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brazilian Politicians took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for brazilian-politicians took 2.58725643157959s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BrazilianCities took 3.910064697265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BrazilianCities took 0.00030684471130371094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BrazilianCities took 0.25733184814453125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BrazilianCities took 0.020379066467285156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BrazilianCities took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BrazilianCities took 0.0007112026214599609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BrazilianCities took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BrazilianCities took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for braziliancities took 3.002150535583496s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bricklink took 1.5465059280395508s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bricklink took 0.0007774829864501953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bricklink took 0.26656603813171387s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bricklink took 0.020456314086914062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bricklink took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bricklink took 0.0007143020629882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bricklink took 6.556510925292969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bricklink took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bricklink took 10.10707950592041s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for British Museum Collection took 30.7256498336792s
Availability | VoID file availability check for British Museum Collection took 0.0006477832794189453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for British Museum Collection took 0.2711169719696045s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for British Museum Collection took 0.020735979080200195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for British Museum Collection took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for British Museum Collection took 0.0007357597351074219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for British Museum Collection took 3.695487976074219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for British Museum Collection took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for british-museum-collection took 73.27360534667969s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.0004544258117675781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.25969576835632324s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.0206451416015625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.0007112026214599609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for brown-corpus-in-rdf-nif took 2.453299045562744s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for French Plant Health Bulletins took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.00027871131896972656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.261615514755249s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.02079939842224121s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for French Plant Health Bulletins took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.0007174015045166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for French Plant Health Bulletins took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for French Plant Health Bulletins took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bsv took 2.9507012367248535s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 2.7765002250671387s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.0006115436553955078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.272108793258667s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.02082657814025879s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 1.71661376953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.0007128715515136719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bulgarian_admissions_to_correctional_facilities took 6.421191215515137s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bund Offener Haushalt took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.0002586841583251953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.2604336738586426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.020324230194091797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bund Offener Haushalt took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.0006990432739257812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bund Offener Haushalt took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bund Offener Haushalt took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bund-offener-haushalt took 3.0090901851654053s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.0002460479736328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.2785797119140625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.020255327224731445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.0006935596466064453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 3.457069396972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bundestagnebeneinkuenfte took 2.997018575668335s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for business.data.gov.uk took 0.3582606315612793s
Availability | VoID file availability check for business.data.gov.uk took 0.00046896934509277344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for business.data.gov.uk took 0.29599809646606445s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for business.data.gov.uk took 0.020231008529663086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for business.data.gov.uk took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for business.data.gov.uk took 0.00070953369140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for business.data.gov.uk took 4.9591064453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for business.data.gov.uk took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for business-data-gov-uk took 2.954434871673584s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4444394111633301s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.0006680488586425781s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.9530181884765625s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.355069637298584s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.539269208908081s
Interoperability | New terms check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.7044050693511963s
Versatility | Languages check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 30.342959880828857s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4703829288482666s
Security | Check HTTPS for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.23189234733581543s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.44035840034484863s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2526824474334717s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.3566586971282959s
License | MR license check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2836747169494629s
License | HR license check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 26.079976558685303s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.39139604568481445s
Understandability | Number of label check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.7587659358978271s
Understandability | URI regex check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.5851867198944092s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.27965426445007324s
Verifiability | Authors check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.37772297859191895s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.34595751762390137s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 7.390975952148438e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.20690011978149414s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.27620577812194824s
Interlinking | skos check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.24318432807922363s
Interlinking | skos check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2470998764038086s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.23527765274047852s
Currency | Creation date check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4332563877105713s
Currency | Modification date check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.46662306785583496s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.5246524810791016s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 4.291534423828125e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.21845769882202148s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.031896352767944336s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.25058841705322266s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2117297649383545s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.5474069118499756s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.03291153907775879s
Security | Sign check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.21346068382263184s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 22.25507164001465s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.31603550910949707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.020115137100219727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.0006866455078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for BVMC took 118.37255334854126s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.00024271011352539062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.31911802291870117s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.020042896270751953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.0006830692291259766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 2.765655517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cabbage took 5.36268162727356s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for cablegate took 1.3933212757110596s
Availability | VoID file availability check for cablegate took 0.0006318092346191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for cablegate took 0.31786584854125977s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for cablegate took 0.02048039436340332s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for cablegate took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for cablegate took 0.0007011890411376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for cablegate took 6.651878356933594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for cablegate took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cablegate took 7.49085545539856s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Calames took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Calames took 0.0006163120269775391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Calames took 0.3239419460296631s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Calames took 0.020527362823486328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Calames took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Calames took 0.0007305145263671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Calames took 3.3855438232421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Calames took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for calames took 6.981882095336914s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CaLiGraph took 95.63405323028564s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.00025391578674316406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CaLiGraph took 0.3190281391143799s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CaLiGraph took 0.020388364791870117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CaLiGraph took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CaLiGraph took 0.0006952285766601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CaLiGraph took 3.647804260253906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CaLiGraph took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CaLiGraph took 109.81997537612915s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CaLiGraph took 1.3461837768554688s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.0005886554718017578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CaLiGraph took 0.263979434967041s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CaLiGraph took 0.02034759521484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CaLiGraph took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CaLiGraph took 0.0007393360137939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CaLiGraph took 7.724761962890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CaLiGraph took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for caligraph took 5.719123601913452s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for can-link took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for can-link took 0.0002582073211669922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for can-link took 0.24882197380065918s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for can-link took 0.02076888084411621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for can-link took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for can-link took 0.0007107257843017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for can-link took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for can-link took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for can-link took 2.912344455718994s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.06293439865112305s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.00024390220642089844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.2673165798187256s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.02037954330444336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.0007174015045166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cap-italy-rdf took 2.7316126823425293s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for person took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for person took 0.00024890899658203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for person took 0.24379944801330566s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for person took 0.020549774169921875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for person took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for person took 0.0007181167602539062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for person took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for person took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for card took 2.3126168251037598s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.000640869140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.26892662048339844s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.02045416831970215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0006952285766601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 3.695487976074219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for catalan-eurowordnet-lemon-lexicon-3-0 took 2.962496757507324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.0002830028533935547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.28461432456970215s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.020413637161254883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.0006985664367675781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for catalogus-professorum-lipsiensis took 2.9797325134277344s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.5571508407592773s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.00024580955505371094s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 111.16763138771057s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.9129557609558105s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 8.240450382232666s
Interoperability | New terms check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 15.21199345588684s
Versatility | Languages check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 300.20455980300903s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 3.207054615020752s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.24718737602233887s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 10.208231687545776s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.2755317687988281s
License | MR license check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.4470992088317871s
License | HR license check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 300.1840486526489s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.42468690872192383s
Understandability | Number of label check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.245340585708618s
Understandability | URI regex check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.6822960376739502s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.35185790061950684s
Verifiability | Authors check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.20728445053100586s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.26517677307128906s
Performance | Throughput check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 11.579219102859497s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 5.841255187988281e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.1941545009613037s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.19928836822509766s
Interlinking | skos check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.46294736862182617s
Interlinking | skos check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.4414176940917969s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 6.014507293701172s
Currency | Creation date check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.4959137439727783s
Currency | Modification date check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.22865915298461914s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 150.4495403766632s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.19462347030639648s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.3003115653991699s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.31586170196533203s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 38.13598442077637s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.645616054534912s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.589792490005493s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.21024584770202637s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 93.40342116355896s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 8.30275297164917s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 37.72212600708008s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.4785475730895996s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 85.23561549186707s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.7665975093841553s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.553706169128418s
Security | Sign check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.7032854557037354s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 5.823766708374023s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.1787147521972656s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.021121501922607422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.8596649169921875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.0007469654083251953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Catch_Record_(2014-_2019) took 2264.8526871204376s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.0005729198455810547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.32842397689819336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.020490169525146484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.0007166862487792969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.00010037422180175781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ce4r took 5.327839374542236s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.4177875518798828s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.0002722740173339844s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.8693456649780273s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.7470109462738037s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.27707362174987793s
Interoperability | New terms check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.7484040260314941s
Versatility | Languages check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 58.15133857727051s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.137406587600708s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.27922987937927246s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1508033275604248s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.16139960289001465s
License | MR license check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3142392635345459s
License | HR license check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.340487003326416s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.15047311782836914s
Understandability | Number of label check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3655061721801758s
Understandability | URI regex check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3084127902984619s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.16808772087097168s
Verifiability | Authors check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1750504970550537s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1877613067626953s
Performance | Throughput check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 10.829106330871582s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 7.009506225585938e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.23603343963623047s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.47821784019470215s
Interlinking | skos check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.8036098480224609s
Interlinking | skos check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1806199550628662s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.46546244621276855s
Currency | Creation date check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.611091136932373s
Currency | Modification date check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.45377182960510254s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 2.3745455741882324s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1611008644104004s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3993244171142578s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.4159421920776367s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.682908296585083s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.030231475830078125s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.027820825576782227s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3463606834411621s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.249748945236206s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 2.4024713039398193s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.3591628074645996s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.5402085781097412s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.02951335906982422s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.2821366786956787s
Security | Sign check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1567680835723877s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1855.13045668602s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.5339419841766357s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.021335124969482422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.0007483959197998047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 9.059906005859375e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ceo took 1980.8638875484467s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Charging Stations took 6.67572021484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Charging Stations took 0.0002391338348388672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Charging Stations took 0.25150084495544434s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Charging Stations took 0.020385026931762695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Charging Stations took 2.3603439331054688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Charging Stations took 0.0007050037384033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Charging Stations took 3.218650817871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Charging Stations took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for charging-stations took 3.0337467193603516s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chat Game corpus took 5.3882598876953125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chat Game corpus took 0.0007259845733642578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chat Game corpus took 0.2852017879486084s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chat Game corpus took 0.020438194274902344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chat Game corpus took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chat Game corpus took 0.0006804466247558594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chat Game corpus took 7.891654968261719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chat Game corpus took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chat-game-corpus took 12.686682939529419s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 7.200241088867188e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.00021314620971679688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.2683234214782715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.020863771438598633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.0007021427154541016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 3.528594970703125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chebi took 3.0315277576446533s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chem2Bio2RDF took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.00086212158203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.26947951316833496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.020601749420166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chem2Bio2RDF took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.000701904296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chem2Bio2RDF took 5.745887756347656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chem2Bio2RDF took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chem2bio2rdf took 135.21728467941284s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ChEMBL RDF took 0.7939774990081787s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ChEMBL RDF took 0.0006017684936523438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ChEMBL RDF took 0.26018190383911133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ChEMBL RDF took 0.020607709884643555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ChEMBL RDF took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ChEMBL RDF took 0.0007023811340332031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ChEMBL RDF took 5.0067901611328125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ChEMBL RDF took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chembl-rdf took 3.9464683532714844s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb  dataset took 2.2749264240264893s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb  dataset took 0.0002722740173339844s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb  dataset took 7.24911904335022s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb  dataset took 2.5277891159057617s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5303905010223389s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb  dataset took 1.9909260272979736s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5281696319580078s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5254001617431641s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5382254123687744s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5279135704040527s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb  dataset took 0.4996836185455322s
License | MR license check for chemdb  dataset took 0.49957990646362305s
License | HR license check for chemdb  dataset took 0.49502062797546387s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5165677070617676s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5333237648010254s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb  dataset took 0.9805517196655273s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5042142868041992s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5005850791931152s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb  dataset took 0.4972820281982422s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb  dataset took 13.053648948669434s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb  dataset took 7.104873657226562e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb  dataset took 0.4865539073944092s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5349311828613281s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5005002021789551s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5001723766326904s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb  dataset took 0.4999203681945801s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb  dataset took 1.0349154472351074s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb  dataset took 1.0267717838287354s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb  dataset took 1.8640408515930176s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb  dataset took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5387725830078125s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb  dataset took 0.5265007019042969s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb  dataset took 0.503655195236206s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb  dataset took 0.5272977352142334s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb  dataset took 0.0003445148468017578s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb  dataset took 0.03850841522216797s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb  dataset took 0.49531102180480957s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb  dataset took 1.0324101448059082s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb  dataset took 0.5833024978637695s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb  dataset took 2.188873767852783s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb  dataset took 1.4093875885009766s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb  dataset took 1.9219396114349365s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb  dataset took 0.02267313003540039s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb  dataset took 0.5312469005584717s
Security | Sign check for chemdb  dataset took 0.49848222732543945s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb  dataset took 262.32690811157227s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb  dataset took 0.390671968460083s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb  dataset took 0.021001100540161133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb  dataset took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb  dataset took 0.0007145404815673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb  dataset took 7.009506225585938e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb  dataset took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb  dataset took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-basicInfo took 348.72684478759766s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4893827438354492s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0003008842468261719s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 7.128150939941406s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.5268912315368652s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5299489498138428s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.9965403079986572s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5431368350982666s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5445282459259033s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5316951274871826s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5342178344726562s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.49996232986450195s
License | MR license check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5051963329315186s
License | HR license check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4948232173919678s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5363388061523438s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5286381244659424s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.9969282150268555s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5048477649688721s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.49561548233032227s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4834775924682617s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 13.002518892288208s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.00012063980102539062s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.501140832901001s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5147862434387207s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5040764808654785s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5002892017364502s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4996216297149658s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.0433833599090576s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.0338516235351562s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.8482928276062012s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 9.5367431640625e-07s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5228946208953857s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5349447727203369s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.49993419647216797s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5354318618774414s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.00030303001403808594s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.03427767753601074s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5111222267150879s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.0324695110321045s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5815231800079346s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.1733479499816895s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.4111003875732422s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.9158992767333984s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.021494150161743164s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5159368515014648s
Security | Sign check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5004923343658447s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 402.67949390411377s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.41860318183898926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.021149158477783203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0007345676422119141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 5.340576171875e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-estimatedProperties took 486.63358974456787s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4968092441558838s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.00025916099548339844s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb phase transition dataset took 7.158490419387817s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.5269417762756348s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5151045322418213s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.008960723876953s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5262227058410645s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5272719860076904s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5172789096832275s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5216310024261475s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4992978572845459s
License | MR license check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5010051727294922s
License | HR license check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5002572536468506s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.531083345413208s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5294933319091797s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.9965865612030029s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5008687973022461s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.48422932624816895s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5036923885345459s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 13.941765308380127s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb phase transition dataset took 6.937980651855469e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5040073394775391s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5229089260101318s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4886057376861572s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5045192241668701s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4963266849517822s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.0320250988006592s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.0306787490844727s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.859900951385498s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.6226043701171875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4897804260253906s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5350532531738281s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.48874950408935547s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5328962802886963s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.0003046989440917969s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.03484368324279785s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4911978244781494s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.0036873817443848s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5818140506744385s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.1648402214050293s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.3855526447296143s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.8866431713104248s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.021802902221679688s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5353918075561523s
Security | Sign check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.49840641021728516s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb phase transition dataset took 621.226598739624s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.40781164169311523s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.02126336097717285s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.002716064453125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.0006935596466064453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb phase transition dataset took 5.14984130859375e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb phase transition dataset took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-phaseTransition took 706.6666371822357s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4899623394012451s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.0002841949462890625s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 7.402795314788818s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.50410795211792s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 3.5505270957946777s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.9790287017822266s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5397777557373047s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5236518383026123s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5438470840454102s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5317404270172119s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5005066394805908s
License | MR license check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5006844997406006s
License | HR license check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.484468936920166s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5361948013305664s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5290176868438721s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.9997994899749756s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4965529441833496s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5040988922119141s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4993577003479004s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 15.251980543136597s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 6.604194641113281e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5023880004882812s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5295243263244629s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4898989200592041s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49579453468322754s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5001621246337891s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.031566858291626s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.0263457298278809s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.836822748184204s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 9.5367431640625e-07s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4908576011657715s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5269417762756348s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5036356449127197s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5351636409759521s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.0003097057342529297s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.03432941436767578s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4923257827758789s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.0191402435302734s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5835673809051514s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.1762747764587402s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.4053373336791992s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.909087896347046s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.021506547927856445s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.544933557510376s
Security | Sign check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4963221549987793s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 631.2254557609558s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5539002418518066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.021082401275634766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.0006928443908691406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.00010561943054199219s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-thermochemistry took 721.3838582038879s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ChemPedia RDF took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ChemPedia RDF took 0.000713348388671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ChemPedia RDF took 0.2697782516479492s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ChemPedia RDF took 0.023329973220825195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ChemPedia RDF took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ChemPedia RDF took 0.0011653900146484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ChemPedia RDF took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ChemPedia RDF took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chempedia-rdf took 28.34729290008545s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chiman Maru took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chiman Maru took 0.000274658203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chiman Maru took 0.268174409866333s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chiman Maru took 0.020892858505249023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chiman Maru took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chiman Maru took 0.0007033348083496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chiman Maru took 4.935264587402344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chiman Maru took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ChimanMaru_Entrepreneur took 2.319713592529297s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 393.13009428977966s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.0008037090301513672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.30497288703918457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.025208234786987305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 1.9311904907226562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.0012230873107910156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.00014972686767578125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Chinese_Red_Classic_Song_Linked_Data_Dataset took 799.1764867305756s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chronicling America took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chronicling America took 0.0013127326965332031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chronicling America took 0.2824568748474121s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chronicling America took 0.024624109268188477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chronicling America took 1.7404556274414062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chronicling America took 0.0012483596801757812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chronicling America took 0.0001347064971923828s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chronicling America took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chronicling-america took 6.617659568786621s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.694230318069458s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.0006761550903320312s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 133.74274921417236s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 2.0038223266601562s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.6097331047058105s
