Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0007560253143310547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.2590782642364502s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.6125586032867432s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0007188320159912109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0003771781921386719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 0080-3626 took 8.581553936004639s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用图 took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用图 took 0.0002994537353515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用图 took 0.25781869888305664s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用图 took 0.020326852798461914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用图 took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用图 took 0.0007183551788330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用图 took 3.314018249511719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用图 took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 10.12041geodata.290864223.ver1.db_ took 4.65911602973938s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 113322 took 4.792213439941406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 113322 took 0.0004661083221435547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 113322 took 0.26416492462158203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 113322 took 0.02020859718322754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 113322 took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 113322 took 0.0007255077362060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 113322 took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 113322 took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 11 took 4.893643379211426s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Korepetycje Buki took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Korepetycje Buki took 0.0002739429473876953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Korepetycje Buki took 0.27037477493286133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Korepetycje Buki took 0.020162105560302734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Korepetycje Buki took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Korepetycje Buki took 0.0007171630859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Korepetycje Buki took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Korepetycje Buki took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 12323 took 2.4015212059020996s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 30.320404767990112s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.0007822513580322266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.7011325359344482s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.0205996036529541s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.0007543563842773438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 9.393692016601562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 2000-us-census-rdf took 85.2979748249054s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 1.7380824089050293s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.0006186962127685547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.28536319732666016s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.020600557327270508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.0007266998291015625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 2001-spanish-census-to-rdf took 8.525393962860107s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Open Data Web took 0.32790231704711914s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Open Data Web took 0.00025963783264160156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Open Data Web took 0.7194688320159912s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Open Data Web took 0.020575761795043945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Open Data Web took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Open Data Web took 0.0007302761077880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Open Data Web took 3.790855407714844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Open Data Web took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data.odw.tw took 3.6443395614624023s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用 took 8.034706115722656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用 took 0.00025272369384765625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用 took 0.2601473331451416s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用 took 0.020601749420166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用 took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用 took 0.00069427490234375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用 took 3.2901763916015625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用 took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data1.odw.tw took 3.353585958480835s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用模型 took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用模型 took 0.0007011890411376953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用模型 took 0.2565114498138428s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用模型 took 0.020499229431152344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用模型 took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用模型 took 0.000720977783203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用模型 took 3.2901763916015625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用模型 took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data2.odw.tw took 6.12460470199585s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Indian Biodiversity took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Indian Biodiversity took 0.0006823539733886719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Indian Biodiversity took 0.24637055397033691s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Indian Biodiversity took 0.020576953887939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Indian Biodiversity took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Indian Biodiversity took 0.0007226467132568359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Indian Biodiversity took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Indian Biodiversity took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _https:data.bioontology.orgontologiesBOFdownloadapikey=8b5b7825-538d-40e0-9e9e-5ab9274a9aeb&download_format=rdf took 3.9747633934020996s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.0005629062652587891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.27409958839416504s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.020663022994995117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.0007045269012451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 3.24249267578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for a-collection-of-papers-for-lrec2014-and-related-workshops took 3.019742250442505s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ITS TEST DATASET took 7.343292236328125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.0004525184631347656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.2639615535736084s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.020386695861816406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ITS TEST DATASET took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.0006947517395019531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ITS TEST DATASET took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ITS TEST DATASET took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for A1 took 2.8240764141082764s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SummerOlympics took 1.8469738960266113s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SummerOlympics took 0.0006330013275146484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SummerOlympics took 0.28514552116394043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SummerOlympics took 0.020318269729614258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SummerOlympics took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SummerOlympics took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SummerOlympics took 7.081031799316406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SummerOlympics took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for abc took 6.197359085083008s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Test_m took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Test_m took 0.0002510547637939453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Test_m took 0.27284932136535645s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Test_m took 0.02066206932067871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Test_m took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Test_m took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Test_m took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Test_m took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ABC took 2.4563393592834473s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for my intro took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for my intro took 0.0002841949462890625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for my intro took 0.2721128463745117s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for my intro took 0.02126908302307129s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for my intro took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for my intro took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for my intro took 3.457069396972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for my intro took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for abhay_intro took 2.3945231437683105s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.6886153221130371s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.0002231597900390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.28200244903564453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.0208587646484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.0006945133209228516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.00010585784912109375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for abs-linked-data took 3.169797420501709s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Academic Offer of UNL took 5.245208740234375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.0002543926239013672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.26999974250793457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.020546436309814453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Academic Offer of UNL took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.0007283687591552734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Academic Offer of UNL took 3.314018249511719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Academic Offer of UNL took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for academic-offer-of-unl took 2.872349739074707s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AcadOnto took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AcadOnto took 0.0005192756652832031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AcadOnto took 0.2947211265563965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AcadOnto took 0.020940780639648438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AcadOnto took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AcadOnto took 0.0006976127624511719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AcadOnto took 3.62396240234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AcadOnto took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for acadonto took 2.8887734413146973s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 9.894721269607544s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.0004220008850097656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.26299262046813965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.020611286163330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 1.8835067749023438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for acorn-sat took 36.65219259262085s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Addgene took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Addgene took 0.000949859619140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Addgene took 0.27905821800231934s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Addgene took 0.029198169708251953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Addgene took 2.0265579223632812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Addgene took 0.0014045238494873047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Addgene took 7.128715515136719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Addgene took 1.049041748046875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for addgene took 16.54422426223755s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 5.173683166503906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.0014023780822753906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.25382542610168457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.028977155685424805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 2.288818359375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.0016951560974121094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.0001647472381591797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 9.775161743164062e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aegp-spanish-textile-and-clothing-association took 5.193608283996582s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AEMET metereological dataset took 30.394477605819702s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.0008013248443603516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.8057734966278076s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.020910978317260742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AEMET metereological dataset took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.0007350444793701172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AEMET metereological dataset took 3.910064697265625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AEMET metereological dataset took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aemet took 144.88871097564697s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Agenda de Zaragoza took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.0002720355987548828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.2807791233062744s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.020765066146850586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Agenda de Zaragoza took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.0007545948028564453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Agenda de Zaragoza took 3.337860107421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Agenda de Zaragoza took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for agenda-de-zaragoza took 3.4261341094970703s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AgriNepalData took 0.04354405403137207s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AgriNepalData took 0.0006592273712158203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AgriNepalData took 0.24197983741760254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AgriNepalData took 0.02039957046508789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AgriNepalData took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AgriNepalData took 0.0007348060607910156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AgriNepalData took 7.343292236328125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AgriNepalData took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrinepaldata took 2.4359443187713623s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGRIS took 260.98270416259766s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGRIS took 0.0006694793701171875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGRIS took 0.7176451683044434s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGRIS took 0.029639482498168945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGRIS took 7.176399230957031e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGRIS took 0.0015971660614013672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGRIS took 0.00015401840209960938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGRIS took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for agris took 556.5861098766327s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGROVOC took 0.15619158744812012s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGROVOC took 0.0005662441253662109s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for AGROVOC took 30.78320598602295s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for AGROVOC took 0.40595412254333496s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for AGROVOC took 13.678670644760132s
Interoperability | New terms check for AGROVOC took 2.694453716278076s
Versatility | Languages check for AGROVOC took 30.083863258361816s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for AGROVOC took 15.579599618911743s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for AGROVOC took 0.08880186080932617s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for AGROVOC took 0.10014677047729492s
Availability | RDF dump link check for AGROVOC took 0.0892338752746582s
License | MR license check for AGROVOC took 0.10157608985900879s
License | HR license check for AGROVOC took 0.3318045139312744s
Amount of data | Number of property check for AGROVOC took 0.10149765014648438s
Understandability | Number of label check for AGROVOC took 27.793082237243652s
Understandability | URI regex check for AGROVOC took 0.17540502548217773s
Understandability | Vocabs check for AGROVOC took 0.0881657600402832s
Verifiability | Authors check for AGROVOC took 0.08748841285705566s
Verifiability | Publishers check for AGROVOC took 0.08807253837585449s
Performance | Throughput check for AGROVOC took 10.438050985336304s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for AGROVOC took 0.0001087188720703125s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for AGROVOC took 0.1963341236114502s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for AGROVOC took 0.18431425094604492s
Interlinking | skos check for AGROVOC took 0.18501043319702148s
Interlinking | skos check for AGROVOC took 0.1731863021850586s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for AGROVOC took 0.1974940299987793s
Currency | Creation date check for AGROVOC took 0.18697047233581543s
Currency | Modification date check for AGROVOC took 0.17940354347229004s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for AGROVOC took 31.32108426094055s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for AGROVOC took 2.6226043701171875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for AGROVOC took 0.07929348945617676s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for AGROVOC took 0.10267949104309082s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for AGROVOC took 0.09805941581726074s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for AGROVOC took 19.30544424057007s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for AGROVOC took 3.0140933990478516s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for AGROVOC took 0.0762324333190918s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for AGROVOC took 10.448907613754272s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for AGROVOC took 18.304481267929077s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for AGROVOC took 12.536439418792725s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for AGROVOC took 0.0001537799835205078s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for AGROVOC took 0.08005475997924805s
Security | Sign check for AGROVOC took 0.09571003913879395s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGROVOC took 0.7867634296417236s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGROVOC took 0.021034955978393555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGROVOC took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGROVOC took 0.0007305145263671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGROVOC took 0.00010824203491210938s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for AGROVOC took 2.384185791015625e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGROVOC took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrovoc took 299.60516571998596s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGROVOC took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGROVOC took 0.00027942657470703125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGROVOC took 0.2930164337158203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGROVOC took 0.020615100860595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGROVOC took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGROVOC took 0.0007195472717285156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGROVOC took 5.91278076171875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGROVOC took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrovoc-skos took 5.102458715438843s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Analytics India Magazine took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Analytics India Magazine took 0.00025582313537597656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Analytics India Magazine took 0.2841477394104004s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Analytics India Magazine took 0.020474910736083984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Analytics India Magazine took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Analytics India Magazine took 0.000698089599609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Analytics India Magazine took 3.218650817871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Analytics India Magazine took 3.409385681152344e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for AIM took 2.877798557281494s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for All India Survey of Higher Education took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.0002925395965576172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.2611277103424072s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.020711660385131836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for All India Survey of Higher Education took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.0007193088531494141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for All India Survey of Higher Education took 3.695487976074219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for All India Survey of Higher Education took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AISHE took 2.907337188720703s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for  equipment ontology took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for  equipment ontology took 0.0002970695495605469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for  equipment ontology took 0.23578524589538574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for  equipment ontology took 0.02050304412841797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for  equipment ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for  equipment ontology took 0.0007147789001464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for  equipment ontology took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for  equipment ontology took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for akash took 2.7836296558380127s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.0002715587615966797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.29770421981811523s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.02070140838623047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.0009167194366455078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 3.337860107421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aksworg took 3.0757322311401367s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AlchemyAPI took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AlchemyAPI took 0.00026035308837890625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AlchemyAPI took 0.26131558418273926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AlchemyAPI took 0.020551681518554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AlchemyAPI took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AlchemyAPI took 0.0007407665252685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AlchemyAPI took 3.504753112792969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AlchemyAPI took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alchemyapi took 2.9679524898529053s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.00025177001953125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.2819681167602539s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.02115154266357422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.0007166862487792969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 3.743171691894531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alexandria-digital-library-adl-gazetteer took 3.3615410327911377s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for aliada-scanbit-net took 1.180114507675171s
Availability | VoID file availability check for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.0002608299255371094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.264066219329834s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.02107095718383789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for aliada-scanbit-net took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.0007331371307373047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.00011849403381347656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for aliada-scanbit-net took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aliada-scanbit-net took 3.670361042022705s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Allen Brain Atlas took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.0002722740173339844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.2762429714202881s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.021284103393554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Allen Brain Atlas took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.0009937286376953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Allen Brain Atlas took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Allen Brain Atlas took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for allen-brain-atlas took 2.9163479804992676s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.4534969329833984s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.0006644725799560547s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 562.0982558727264s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.6991677284240723s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.506251573562622s
Interoperability | New terms check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 4.324993848800659s
Versatility | Languages check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 300.05463099479675s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 3.4459381103515625s
Security | Check HTTPS for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.8708791732788086s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.8319127559661865s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.7245924472808838s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5344054698944092s
License | MR license check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6974456310272217s
License | HR license check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 35.207430362701416s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.8363521099090576s
Understandability | Number of label check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.9310328960418701s
Understandability | URI regex check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1507751941680908s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6548552513122559s
Verifiability | Authors check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.679208517074585s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.651155948638916s
Performance | Throughput check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 10.784545660018921s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 7.200241088867188e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5477969646453857s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5697009563446045s
Interlinking | skos check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6500453948974609s
Interlinking | skos check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6203360557556152s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5409116744995117s
Currency | Creation date check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1761798858642578s
Currency | Modification date check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1535375118255615s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 205.5194342136383s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5712082386016846s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6549780368804932s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6280691623687744s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 147.80305433273315s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 3.0290615558624268s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.6780054569244385s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5941429138183594s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 11.41197657585144s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 9.23050570487976s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 133.37935781478882s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.4543168544769287s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 17.132384300231934s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.8477606773376465s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.8747603893280029s
Security | Sign check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.565546989440918s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 13147.296146154404s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.5371417999267578s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.024886369705200195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.9073486328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.0008409023284912109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.00015497207641601562s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for allie-abbreviation-and-long-form-database-in-life-science took 14683.591228723526s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alojamientos took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alojamientos took 0.00026988983154296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alojamientos took 0.28774261474609375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alojamientos took 0.0210726261138916s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alojamientos took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alojamientos took 0.0007181167602539062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alojamientos took 3.5762786865234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alojamientos took 9.775161743164062e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alojamientos-zaragoza took 3.911027669906616s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.4190247058868408s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.0004932880401611328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.2785520553588867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.020667552947998047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.0007627010345458984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alpino-rdf took 5.204049587249756s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AAT-atawil took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AAT-atawil took 0.0002608299255371094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AAT-atawil took 0.2734994888305664s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AAT-atawil took 0.02079606056213379s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AAT-atawil took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AAT-atawil took 0.0007143020629882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AAT-atawil took 3.2901763916015625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AAT-atawil took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Altawil took 3.73618221282959s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.00026798248291015625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.2670125961303711s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.020967721939086914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.0007269382476806641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 3.552436828613281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for am-collections-online took 3.36311936378479s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amer Nejma took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amer Nejma took 0.0002346038818359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amer Nejma took 0.26232218742370605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amer Nejma took 0.021424531936645508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amer Nejma took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amer Nejma took 0.0007922649383544922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amer Nejma took 3.719329833984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amer Nejma took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Amer_Nejma took 2.826420545578003s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.0002675056457519531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.2666800022125244s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.020867586135864258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.0007314682006835938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 3.4809112548828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for amon took 2.887448310852051s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.6684727668762207s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.0011000633239746094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.265899658203125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.022449970245361328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.0008244514465332031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.00010013580322265625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for amsterdam-museum-as-edm-lod took 3.703890562057495s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.00026035308837890625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.28664183616638184s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.020822763442993164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.0007998943328857422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 3.457069396972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for analisi-del-blog-http-www-beppegrillo-it took 2.9893670082092285s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Animal Diversity Web took 7.700920104980469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Animal Diversity Web took 0.0002734661102294922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Animal Diversity Web took 0.28296518325805664s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Animal Diversity Web took 0.020665645599365234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Animal Diversity Web took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Animal Diversity Web took 0.0007433891296386719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Animal Diversity Web took 3.361701965332031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Animal Diversity Web took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for animal-diversity-web took 2.942904472351074s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Anime Dataset took 4.744529724121094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Anime Dataset took 0.0004401206970214844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Anime Dataset took 0.24736857414245605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Anime Dataset took 0.020933151245117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Anime Dataset took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Anime Dataset took 0.0007572174072265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Anime Dataset took 3.5762786865234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Anime Dataset took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Anime took 4.019262075424194s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ANNO took 7.033348083496094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ANNO took 0.0006341934204101562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ANNO took 0.26642370223999023s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ANNO took 0.02087235450744629s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ANNO took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ANNO took 0.0007050037384033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ANNO took 3.695487976074219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ANNO took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for anno took 8.434628009796143s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.00032806396484375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.2676658630371094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.020876407623291016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.0007548332214355469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 8.749961853027344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AntiqueCarsCollection took 2.8761775493621826s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for apache took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for apache took 0.0006678104400634766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for apache took 0.26577258110046387s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for apache took 0.021204233169555664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for apache took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for apache took 0.0007369518280029297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for apache took 6.079673767089844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for apache took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apache took 3.297778367996216s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF took 5.793571472167969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF took 0.0005850791931152344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF took 0.26596760749816895s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF took 0.022580623626708984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF took 0.000789642333984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF took 5.221366882324219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf took 4.964545726776123s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.0005934238433837891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.24987101554870605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.02068638801574707s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.0007245540618896484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 4.673004150390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-ca-it took 5.669489622116089s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.0005764961242675781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.2778949737548828s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.021213769912719727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.0007402896881103516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 4.673004150390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-ca took 5.622440338134766s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.0005972385406494141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.2731752395629883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.02130722999572754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.0008344650268554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 5.5789947509765625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-es took 6.35370135307312s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.0005712509155273438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.26651430130004883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.021125078201293945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.0007352828979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-gl took 5.6075356006622314s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.0005941390991210938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.25688934326171875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.021296977996826172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.0007073879241943359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 6.580352783203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-ca took 5.691610813140869s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 7.319450378417969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.0005931854248046875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.27420592308044434s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.021093368530273438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.0007331371307373047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 4.982948303222656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-en took 5.698105573654175s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.0005922317504882812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.267500638961792s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.025777578353881836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.0009272098541259766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 5.984306335449219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-es took 5.696789026260376s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 5.745887756347656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.0006735324859619141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.2725241184234619s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.0208890438079834s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 4.935264587402344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-fr took 5.635487794876099s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.0006425380706787109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.26959729194641113s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.021001338958740234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.0007178783416748047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 4.982948303222656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-an took 5.595718622207642s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.0005807876586914062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.25467395782470703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.02070784568786621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.0008373260498046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 5.078315734863281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ast took 5.964796543121338s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.0007255077362060547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.27556324005126953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.02092742919921875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.0007264614105224609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 4.9114227294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ca took 25.041961669921875s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.0005724430084228516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.2901122570037842s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.0212247371673584s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.0007238388061523438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 4.9591064453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-gl took 5.619217157363892s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 5.173683166503906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.0007185935974121094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.2696044445037842s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.029743671417236328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 2.1219253540039062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.0016498565673828125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 9.036064147949219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-pt took 5.941324710845947s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.0006189346313476562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.2758481502532959s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.026846647262573242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 1.7881393432617188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.001379251480102539s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 7.772445678710938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ro took 6.032567977905273s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.00038552284240722656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.2657902240753174s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.021123409271240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.0007352828979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 4.935264587402344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eu-en took 5.7364661693573s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 8.153915405273438e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.0006468296051025391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.2783973217010498s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.020908594131469727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.0007264614105224609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eu-es took 5.655804872512817s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.0006122589111328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.29612040519714355s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.020782947540283203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.0007207393646240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 5.0067901611328125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-fr-ca took 5.680946111679077s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.0006115436553955078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.23885083198547363s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.020580768585205078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.0007214546203613281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 4.696846008300781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-fr-es took 5.554296016693115s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.0005631446838378906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.25864481925964355s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.020731210708618164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-oc-ca took 5.652884006500244s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.0006625652313232422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.2909884452819824s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.021139860153198242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.0007889270782470703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 4.982948303222656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-oc-es took 5.617640018463135s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.0006177425384521484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.3031630516052246s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.021015167236328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.0007252693176269531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 4.696846008300781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-pt-ca took 5.7056193351745605s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.0005743503570556641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.27228641510009766s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.020992517471313477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.0007064342498779297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-pt-gl took 6.613266944885254s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AragoDBPedia took 2.034841537475586s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AragoDBPedia took 0.0005629062652587891s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for AragoDBPedia took 3.352247714996338s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for AragoDBPedia took 2.013033151626587s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for AragoDBPedia took 0.9388210773468018s
Interoperability | New terms check for AragoDBPedia took 2.3998489379882812s
Versatility | Languages check for AragoDBPedia took 60.52348017692566s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for AragoDBPedia took 5.464642524719238s
Security | Check HTTPS for AragoDBPedia took 0.22937703132629395s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for AragoDBPedia took 0.8611409664154053s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for AragoDBPedia took 0.949103593826294s
Availability | RDF dump link check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4352247714996338s
License | MR license check for AragoDBPedia took 0.6825804710388184s
License | HR license check for AragoDBPedia took 6.963987112045288s
Amount of data | Number of property check for AragoDBPedia took 0.43839168548583984s
Understandability | Number of label check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5876972675323486s
Understandability | URI regex check for AragoDBPedia took 0.9957153797149658s
Understandability | Vocabs check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5136620998382568s
Verifiability | Authors check for AragoDBPedia took 0.41156959533691406s
Verifiability | Publishers check for AragoDBPedia took 0.46265411376953125s
Performance | Throughput check for AragoDBPedia took 12.006636619567871s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for AragoDBPedia took 7.271766662597656e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5669143199920654s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5177748203277588s
Interlinking | skos check for AragoDBPedia took 0.7002222537994385s
Interlinking | skos check for AragoDBPedia took 0.3850209712982178s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5259130001068115s
Currency | Creation date check for AragoDBPedia took 2.036571502685547s
Currency | Modification date check for AragoDBPedia took 0.48563361167907715s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for AragoDBPedia took 5.838162422180176s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for AragoDBPedia took 2.1457672119140625e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for AragoDBPedia took 0.41169190406799316s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for AragoDBPedia took 0.5332551002502441s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for AragoDBPedia took 0.5086231231689453s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for AragoDBPedia took 1.27117919921875s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for AragoDBPedia took 0.027278423309326172s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for AragoDBPedia took 0.030816078186035156s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for AragoDBPedia took 0.48888635635375977s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for AragoDBPedia took 4.777880907058716s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for AragoDBPedia took 0.7248179912567139s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for AragoDBPedia took 2.907228469848633s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for AragoDBPedia took 1.4011306762695312s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for AragoDBPedia took 5.599043369293213s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for AragoDBPedia took 0.03335762023925781s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for AragoDBPedia took 0.6067147254943848s
Security | Sign check for AragoDBPedia took 0.6426024436950684s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for AragoDBPedia took 3337.3798654079437s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AragoDBPedia took 1.1462950706481934s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AragoDBPedia took 0.024173974990844727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AragoDBPedia took 2.0503997802734375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AragoDBPedia took 0.0007646083831787109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AragoDBPedia took 0.00012445449829101562s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for AragoDBPedia took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AragoDBPedia took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aragodbpedia took 15956.37826704979s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archives Hub Linked Data took 30.380778789520264s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.0007965564727783203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.286928653717041s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.020280838012695312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archives Hub Linked Data took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.0007088184356689453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archives Hub Linked Data took 5.888938903808594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archives Hub Linked Data took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for archiveshub-linkeddata took 85.24400091171265s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archivi ISMA took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archivi ISMA took 0.0003440380096435547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archivi ISMA took 0.7000391483306885s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archivi ISMA took 0.021034955978393555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archivi ISMA took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archivi ISMA took 0.0007312297821044922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archivi ISMA took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archivi ISMA took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for archivio-isma took 4.73269248008728s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ARIADNE took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ARIADNE took 0.0002834796905517578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ARIADNE took 0.27551841735839844s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ARIADNE took 0.021741628646850586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ARIADNE took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ARIADNE took 0.0007457733154296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ARIADNE took 3.6716461181640625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ARIADNE took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ariadne took 3.342104434967041s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Aristotle University took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Aristotle University took 0.0002741813659667969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Aristotle University took 0.2679731845855713s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Aristotle University took 0.020830869674682617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Aristotle University took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Aristotle University took 0.0007345676422119141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Aristotle University took 3.409385681152344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Aristotle University took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aristotle-university took 3.9230690002441406s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 5.845093250274658s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.0006258487701416016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.2704453468322754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.021085262298583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 1.4781951904296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.0007388591766357422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 6.413459777832031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress-e-afmx-1 took 24.708393335342407s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.00027489662170410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.24931836128234863s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.020618438720703125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.0007102489471435547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 3.3855438232421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress_e-afmx-4 took 3.3486733436584473s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 3.925013542175293s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.0008463859558105469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.27464985847473145s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.02073049545288086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.0007712841033935547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress_e-mtab-104 took 24.992095947265625s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.0007109642028808594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.24872660636901855s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.02043461799621582s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.0007109642028808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.00011301040649414062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 1.33514404296875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for artenuevosmedios-gnoss took 9.607132196426392s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.0002548694610595703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.2575104236602783s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.021181344985961914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.0007417201995849609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Arthron took 2.8484716415405273s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Arthroscopy community took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Arthroscopy community took 0.0005526542663574219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Arthroscopy community took 0.27497196197509766s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Arthroscopy community took 0.020865917205810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Arthroscopy community took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Arthroscopy community took 0.0007131099700927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Arthroscopy community took 0.00010800361633300781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Arthroscopy community took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arthroscopy took 2.9887821674346924s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.1643531322479248s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0005795955657958984s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08562970161437988s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08299136161804199s
Versatility | Languages check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0727841854095459s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.07143092155456543s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.07448744773864746s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08743929862976074s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.07130837440490723s
License | MR license check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0733790397644043s
License | HR license check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08085966110229492s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08336091041564941s
Understandability | Number of label check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.06923937797546387s
Understandability | URI regex check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.1563248634338379s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09268021583557129s
Verifiability | Authors check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08451700210571289s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.07509779930114746s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.00018477439880371094s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08448624610900879s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08472132682800293s
Interlinking | skos check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.07336211204528809s
Interlinking | skos check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09720444679260254s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0741586685180664s
Currency | Creation date check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.15654730796813965s
Currency | Modification date check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.16768646240234375s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.17576146125793457s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 9.5367431640625e-07s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0842742919921875s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.07966732978820801s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0724937915802002s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.6432573795318604s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0006930828094482422s
Security | Sign check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08367252349853516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.685347318649292s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.021226167678833008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 2.0265579223632812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0007505416870117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 7.152557373046875e-07s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for artxscienceinternational-wikidata took 22.97578001022339s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 3.1984615325927734s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.0006899833679199219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.28803467750549316s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.020354032516479492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.0006954669952392578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 7.772445678710938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-_NTM-Formosan-Aborigines took 12.001042127609253s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 2.2300257682800293s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.0005919933319091797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.2617061138153076s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.02064967155456543s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.0007309913635253906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 8.416175842285156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks took 10.543941020965576s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 2.2748634815216064s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.0006480216979980469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.27702927589416504s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.0208740234375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.0007078647613525391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 9.5367431640625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-AS-TFD-Fish-Species took 12.579487800598145s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 2.2344024181365967s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.0007083415985107422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.7195265293121338s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.020380496978759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.0007429122924804688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-CRB took 14.08414888381958s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 2.236570119857788s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.0005643367767333984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.31591200828552246s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.020691633224487305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.000736236572265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.00010704994201660156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-CTS-TV-Programs took 11.13681435585022s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 2.2278995513916016s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.00061798095703125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.28104400634765625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.020491600036621094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.0007383823394775391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 3.743171691894531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-DQOT took 12.091075658798218s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 2.249957799911499s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.0006558895111083984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.2858250141143799s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.02054119110107422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.0007152557373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 8.058547973632812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-IHP-WCD took 12.108927726745605s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 4.595233917236328s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.0005977153778076172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.2684040069580078s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.020253896713256836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.0007355213165283203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 8.177757263183594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Linked-Taiwan-Artists took 14.432784795761108s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 2.2358617782592773s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.0006940364837646484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.280440092086792s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.020296812057495117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.0007147789001464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 5.3882598876953125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan took 11.062146425247192s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 2.2331666946411133s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.0006041526794433594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.27355384826660156s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.020298242568969727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.0007534027099609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 5.3882598876953125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths took 11.023584842681885s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 21.098397254943848s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.0006971359252929688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.2831242084503174s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.020406007766723633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.0007224082946777344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Qing-Secret-Societies took 33.06114959716797s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 2.2568416595458984s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.0006382465362548828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.2955141067504883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.020544052124023438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.0007398128509521484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 7.653236389160156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Tibetan-Audio-Archive took 11.162715435028076s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 2.271695375442505s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.0007002353668212891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.2760765552520752s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.02069687843322754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.0007724761962890625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 8.058547973632812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC_-_CCP_Archive took 12.132591485977173s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 2.262446403503418s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.0008955001831054688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.27422642707824707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.02158188819885254s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.0007467269897460938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC_-_DNB took 10.629981517791748s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.0005428791046142578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.2558748722076416s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.020529747009277344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.0007119178771972656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 6.461143493652344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asit took 7.966033935546875s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.0006372928619384766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.26172471046447754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.02036595344543457s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.0007052421569824219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 3.719329833984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asjp took 5.641348838806152s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ASN:US took 523.0938856601715s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ASN:US took 0.0008463859558105469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ASN:US took 0.3088221549987793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ASN:US took 0.02089524269104004s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ASN:US took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ASN:US took 0.0007441043853759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ASN:US took 7.390975952148438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ASN:US took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asn-us took 1338.1109011173248s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 4.8160552978515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.0006387233734130859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.7225284576416016s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.020777463912963867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.000759124755859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aspire-mmu took 7.0038840770721436s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for associations took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for associations took 0.0006248950958251953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for associations took 0.8217086791992188s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for associations took 0.020786523818969727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for associations took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for associations took 0.0007476806640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for associations took 6.937980651855469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for associations took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for associations took 10.022545576095581s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.00024628639221191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.28832411766052246s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.020214319229125977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.0007483959197998047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for atc-publikovan--s-kl took 4.308650255203247s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.0005261898040771484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.25589728355407715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.020244121551513672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.0007193088531494141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 9.131431579589844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for athelia-rfid took 4.862969160079956s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.00063323974609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.2523791790008545s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.020569801330566406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 1.4781951904296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.0007832050323486328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for auditsocials-glossary took 4.330264091491699s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AUEB Linked Open Data took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.00024127960205078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.274014949798584s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.02048182487487793s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AUEB Linked Open Data took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.0006859302520751953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AUEB Linked Open Data took 2.765655517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AUEB Linked Open Data took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aueb-linked-open-data took 3.3631110191345215s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.6172463893890381s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.0006434917449951172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.2629811763763428s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.020389318466186523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.0007307529449462891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 4.839897155761719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AugustiniConfessiones took 3.929922580718994s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.6342966556549072s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.0005578994750976562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.25032520294189453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.020247459411621094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.0007307529449462891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 9.083747863769531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for austrian_ski_racers took 3.8254261016845703s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AVsOnto took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AVsOnto took 0.0005986690521240234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AVsOnto took 0.25684332847595215s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AVsOnto took 0.020341873168945312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AVsOnto took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AVsOnto took 0.0007154941558837891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AVsOnto took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AVsOnto took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AVsOnto took 3.834641695022583s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.3043673038482666s
Availability | VoID file availability check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.0005424022674560547s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 204.28652143478394s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.5008013248443604s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.1004128456116s
Interoperability | New terms check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 268.1483099460602s
Versatility | Languages check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.09117221832275s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.0232608318329s
Security | Check HTTPS for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.21935057640075684s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.22527050971984863s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.1754450798034668s
Availability | RDF dump link check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.08628535270690918s
License | MR license check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 53.7530403137207s
License | HR license check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.01502418518066s
Amount of data | Number of property check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.13623046875s
Understandability | Number of label check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 171.3718068599701s
Understandability | URI regex check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.24303245544433594s
Understandability | Vocabs check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.09880375862121582s
Verifiability | Authors check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.09817004203796387s
Verifiability | Publishers check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.09748721122741699s
Performance | Throughput check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 10.557480335235596s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 6.842613220214844e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.11475753784179688s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 186.41543126106262s
Interlinking | skos check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.12350726127624512s
Interlinking | skos check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.10492563247680664s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.10103559494018555s
Currency | Creation date check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.1876671314239502s
Currency | Modification date check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.19032931327819824s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 577.1141676902771s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 3.337860107421875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.12471866607666016s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 29.017472505569458s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.306589126586914s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 4.935370206832886s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.12475109100341797s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.2177588939667s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 276.98109126091003s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 3.3975729942321777s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 301.4371075630188s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.850396156311035s
Security | Sign check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.18638086318969727s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.488781213760376s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.8101465702056885s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.021404266357421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 1.7642974853515625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.0007789134979248047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 7.581710815429688e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for b3kat took 4227.651211500168s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BabelNet took 0.5564613342285156s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BabelNet took 0.0006372928619384766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BabelNet took 0.2990245819091797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BabelNet took 0.020708084106445312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BabelNet took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BabelNet took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BabelNet took 0.00016379356384277344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BabelNet took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for babelnet took 6.65661096572876s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bacevicius.lt took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bacevicius.lt took 0.0002491474151611328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bacevicius.lt took 0.267242431640625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bacevicius.lt took 0.020513296127319336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bacevicius.lt took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bacevicius.lt took 0.0007460117340087891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bacevicius.lt took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bacevicius.lt took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bacevicius.lt took 3.2598955631256104s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.5393187999725342s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.0004942417144775391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.281327486038208s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.020515918731689453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.0007338523864746094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bag took 4.6571478843688965s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.8985238075256348s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.00024199485778808594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.2621440887451172s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.02042555809020996s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0007517337799072266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue took 3.795844316482544s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for baixue composer took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for baixue composer took 0.0005710124969482422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for baixue composer took 0.2559773921966553s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for baixue composer took 0.02068805694580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for baixue composer took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for baixue composer took 0.0007152557373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for baixue composer took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for baixue composer took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_composer took 3.598384141921997s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0006117820739746094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.28798556327819824s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.020448923110961914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0007457733154296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 3.6716461181640625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_imagery took 3.096977472305298s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0006520748138427734s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0003414154052734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.25168871879577637s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.02067255973815918s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0007407665252685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 3.24249267578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_imagery1 took 3.4967103004455566s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BAMS took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BAMS took 0.00036644935607910156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BAMS took 0.6893389225006104s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BAMS took 0.02070760726928711s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BAMS took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BAMS took 0.0007517337799072266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BAMS took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BAMS took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bams took 3.3998711109161377s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0003414154052734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.26554274559020996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.020279407501220703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0007104873657226562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for basque-eurowordnet-lemon-lexicon-3-0 took 3.3060314655303955s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Music took 0.3109402656555176s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Music took 0.0006535053253173828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Music took 0.2776906490325928s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Music took 0.02048492431640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Music took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Music took 0.0007445812225341797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Music took 0.00013017654418945312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Music took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-music took 3.3191399574279785s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Programmes took 0.4003317356109619s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Programmes took 0.00047659873962402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Programmes took 0.26633572578430176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Programmes took 0.02062702178955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Programmes took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Programmes took 0.0007653236389160156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Programmes took 0.00010395050048828125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Programmes took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-programmes took 10.954495906829834s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.32450056076049805s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.000667572021484375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.28610658645629883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.02042675018310547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Wildlife Finder took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.0007364749908447266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.00011610984802246094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Wildlife Finder took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-wildlife-finder took 10.128976345062256s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBOP took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBOP took 0.0003032684326171875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBOP took 0.2699465751647949s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBOP took 0.020496368408203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBOP took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBOP took 0.0007481575012207031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBOP took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBOP took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbop took 2.97908616065979s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBOP took 5.316734313964844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBOP took 0.000820159912109375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBOP took 0.26711344718933105s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBOP took 0.020677804946899414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBOP took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBOP took 0.0007274150848388672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBOP took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBOP took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbop-selected took 20.98801827430725s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bdgp took 2.103430986404419s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bdgp took 0.0004954338073730469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bdgp took 0.2566487789154053s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bdgp took 0.020639657974243164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bdgp took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bdgp took 0.000789642333984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bdgp took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bdgp took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bdgp took 9.278388261795044s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bendev Junior took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bendev Junior took 0.0007135868072509766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bendev Junior took 0.2721104621887207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bendev Junior took 0.020322799682617188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bendev Junior took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bendev Junior took 0.0007631778717041016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bendev Junior took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bendev Junior took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bendevoficial took 5.318275451660156s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 5.073070287704468s
Availability | VoID file availability check for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.0004355907440185547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.2701234817504883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.020517349243164062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.0007565021514892578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 7.081031799316406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for beneficiaries-of-the-european-commission took 13.984745264053345s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.0002951622009277344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.24086618423461914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.021060705184936523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.0007922649383544922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 3.2901763916015625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for berlin-offener-haushalt took 3.397989511489868s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for berlios took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for berlios took 0.0007121562957763672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for berlios took 0.2868187427520752s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for berlios took 0.020844459533691406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for berlios took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for berlios took 0.0007040500640869141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for berlios took 9.441375732421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for berlios took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for berlios took 2.6967687606811523s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Between Our Worlds took 8.058547973632812e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Between Our Worlds took 0.0006442070007324219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Between Our Worlds took 0.3190920352935791s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Between Our Worlds took 0.02078413963317871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Between Our Worlds took 1.4781951904296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Between Our Worlds took 0.001035928726196289s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Between Our Worlds took 8.726119995117188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Between Our Worlds took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for betweenourworlds took 9.678659915924072s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.20874524116516113s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.00046944618225097656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.26483726501464844s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.020234346389770508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.0007407665252685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 9.322166442871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bfs-linked-data took 3.213285446166992s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BibBase took 0.05193758010864258s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BibBase took 0.0003681182861328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BibBase took 0.27005887031555176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BibBase took 0.02023172378540039s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BibBase took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BibBase took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BibBase took 9.608268737792969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BibBase took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bibbase took 2.469575881958008s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.0006313323974609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.26555919647216797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.020538806915283203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 9.870529174804688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-escolar-digital-cita took 5.718428373336792s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.0006439685821533203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.2864491939544678s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.021297931671142578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.0007648468017578125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.00011086463928222656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-nacional-escolar-bnescolar took 3.149815320968628s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.0002586841583251953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.2677030563354492s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.02065110206604004s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.0007035732269287109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 3.24249267578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-virtual-miguel-de-cervantes-bvmc-linked-open-data took 2.927250862121582s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.0015659332275390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.2916288375854492s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.020669221878051758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.0007507801055908203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 3.8623809814453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for BibSonomy took 9.729372501373291s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.0005896091461181641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.2616455554962158s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.020502805709838867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.0007622241973876953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 3.337860107421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for billion_triples_challenge_dataset2008 took 5.441455364227295s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.0005006790161132812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.26403069496154785s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.020430564880371094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.0007371902465820312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for billion_triples_challenge_dataset_2010 took 2.6367435455322266s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.0002536773681640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.2544882297515869s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.020600318908691406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.0007314682006835938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-acfsid took 2.9829354286193848s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 60.061031103134155s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.0007417201995849609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.38616180419921875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.020847558975219727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.0007126331329345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 9.799003601074219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-affymetrix took 243.24112677574158s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 60.05701208114624s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.0006577968597412109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.25897645950317383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.02108025550842285s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 1.8596649169921875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.0007419586181640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.00011706352233886719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-biomodels took 264.4999203681946s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.0003638267517089844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.7308762073516846s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.021090269088745117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.0008635520935058594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 3.457069396972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-biomodels-biopax took 5.2857346534729s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 60.04807472229004s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.0007791519165039062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.5361971855163574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.023242473602294922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.0008614063262939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.0005121231079101562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-bioportal took 445.91144847869873s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 60.056072473526s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.0008494853973388672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.3539550304412842s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.025461435317993164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 2.1696090698242188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.0010883808135986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 6.747245788574219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-chembl took 447.6044044494629s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 60.056620836257935s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.0007104873657226562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.2807495594024658s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.0209658145904541s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.0007386207580566406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 5.745887756347656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-clinicaltrials took 265.649534702301s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 60.052611351013184s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.0006902217864990234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.8012821674346924s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.022005558013916016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 1.8596649169921875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.0009417533874511719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 7.557868957519531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ctd took 446.962042093277s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-dataset took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.0007243156433105469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.26380348205566406s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.02092719078063965s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-dataset took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.0007693767547607422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-dataset took 5.459785461425781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-dataset took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-dataset took 23.29947805404663s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 60.0580198764801s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.0006394386291503906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.6919798851013184s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.020926713943481445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.0007565021514892578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 7.653236389160156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-dbsnp took 266.6805250644684s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 60.04188108444214s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.0007023811340332031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.8517787456512451s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.02074718475341797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 1.71661376953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.0007200241088867188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.0001087188720703125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-drugbank took 286.27353262901306s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 60.04804730415344s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.0007877349853515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.6960508823394775s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.021126508712768555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Genage took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.0007503032684326172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Genage took 6.151199340820312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Genage took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-genage took 285.3137788772583s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.0003197193145751953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.705653190612793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.020734071731567383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.0007624626159667969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 6.151199340820312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-genbank took 5.159216642379761s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 60.05752468109131s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.0006968975067138672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 1.204587697982788s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.02047133445739746s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.0007281303405761719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 5.507469177246094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-gendr took 286.3846073150635s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 60.053661823272705s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.0007989406585693359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Goa took 1.2291333675384521s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.020856380462646484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Goa took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.0007531642913818359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.00013709068298339844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Goa took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-goa took 447.13731360435486s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 60.05617880821228s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.0006480216979980469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.728978157043457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.020789623260498047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.0007441043853759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.00010967254638671875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-hgnc took 265.9217572212219s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 60.048513889312744s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.0007674694061279297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.2631661891937256s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.021464824676513672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.0007009506225585938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 6.341934204101562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-homologene took 263.5074679851532s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::INOH took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.0002262592315673828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.2806675434112549s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.02056598663330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::INOH took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.0007143020629882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::INOH took 3.218650817871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::INOH took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-inoh took 2.9199025630950928s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 60.05596995353699s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.0006003379821777344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.2894163131713867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.021013736724853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 1.8835067749023438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.0009448528289794922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.00010776519775390625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-interpro took 263.5784924030304s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 60.05909276008606s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.0010209083557128906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.7757344245910645s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.021570682525634766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.0007302761077880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 7.677078247070312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-iproclass took 446.2563235759735s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 60.052048683166504s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.0007145404815673828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.7041223049163818s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.02066206932067871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.0007443428039550781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 8.797645568847656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-irefindex took 265.78008341789246s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.00025534629821777344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.2750391960144043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.020204782485961914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.0007193088531494141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 5.9604644775390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-kegg took 5.133042573928833s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.0002741813659667969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.24813032150268555s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.020561695098876953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.0007083415985107422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-kegg-biopax took 4.648311376571655s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 60.043145418167114s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.0007877349853515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.696749210357666s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.020907878875732422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 2.0503997802734375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.0008056163787841797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 3.814697265625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-linkedspl took 265.5234742164612s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 60.05767464637756s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.0006988048553466797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.7273168563842773s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.02062511444091797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.0007374286651611328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-lsr took 265.47889041900635s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 60.0619900226593s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.0007426738739013672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.36661529541015625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.02051544189453125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.0007333755493164062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 6.794929504394531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-mesh took 304.4113538265228s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 60.057764291763306s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.0008730888366699219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 1.0702481269836426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.02128911018371582s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.0007867813110351562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 9.608268737792969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-mgi took 325.46642541885376s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 60.050692081451416s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.0007731914520263672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.7667496204376221s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.020891904830932617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.0007390975952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.00012063980102539062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ncbigene took 407.433477640152s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 60.05567789077759s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.0008039474487304688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.7717459201812744s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.021488666534423828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.0007309913635253906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 5.7220458984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ndc took 265.2810046672821s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.00025153160095214844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.7151057720184326s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.02048969268798828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.0007369518280029297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-netpath took 5.771811246871948s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 40.03759002685547s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.0006589889526367188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.7022285461425781s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.023839950561523438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 2.4080276489257812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.0022945404052734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 6.842613220214844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-nextprot took 124.25844407081604s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 60.04964876174927s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.0006999969482421875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.7222011089324951s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.02062392234802246s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Omim took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.0001327991485595703s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Omim took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-omim took 265.52867341041565s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.0007464885711669922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.7005646228790283s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.02057170867919922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.0007321834564208984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 24.611754417419434s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 60.061530113220215s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.0008361339569091797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.3239154815673828s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.021164894104003906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.0010466575622558594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-orphanet took 345.26905393600464s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 60.05665135383606s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.0007143020629882812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.7779598236083984s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.02094435691833496s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.0007140636444091797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pathwaycommons took 266.1846842765808s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 60.056447982788086s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.0006778240203857422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.72171950340271s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.020617008209228516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.0007188320159912109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 7.581710815429688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pharmgkb took 366.31957387924194s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.00027179718017578125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.26102685928344727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.020525693893432617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.0007557868957519531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pharmgkb-biopax took 5.5797340869903564s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PID took 9.679794311523438e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.0002346038818359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.7103190422058105s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.021027326583862305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PID took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.0007696151733398438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PID took 3.4809112548828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PID took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pid took 4.21811318397522s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.0002491474151611328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.29796862602233887s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.020495891571044922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.0007627010345458984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 3.6716461181640625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pubchem-2 took 4.297279357910156s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 60.05730843544006s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.0006320476531982422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.7248826026916504s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.020661354064941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.00013017654418945312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pubmed took 244.68016695976257s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.00025343894958496094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.2627525329589844s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.020455360412597656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.0007269382476806641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 6.890296936035156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-reactome took 4.25555157661438s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.0002448558807373047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.2677135467529297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.020275354385375977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.0007092952728271484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 4.935264587402344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-rhea took 3.3912429809570312s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 60.056687116622925s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.0006651878356933594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.26053786277770996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.020731449127197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.0007572174072265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 8.487701416015625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sabiork took 263.89279985427856s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 60.0565984249115s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.0006744861602783203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.7088866233825684s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.020711660385131836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.0007369518280029297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.00010848045349121094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sgd took 266.23643469810486s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.0006585121154785156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.2595560550689697s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.020342588424682617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 24.583370685577393s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 60.0608172416687s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.0007231235504150391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.2941930294036865s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.02068924903869629s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sider took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.0007042884826660156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sider took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sider took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sider took 326.590455532074s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 5.4836273193359375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.00026535987854003906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.26503467559814453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.020270109176635742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.0007443428039550781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-spike took 5.236502170562744s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-taxon took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.0005917549133300781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.2562241554260254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.02051568031311035s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-taxon took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.0007619857788085938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-taxon took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-taxon took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-taxon took 23.27083730697632s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 60.05331826210022s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.0006687641143798828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.26832008361816406s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.02075028419494629s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.0007359981536865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.00010609626770019531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-taxonomy took 343.51928305625916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 60.05627250671387s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.0007658004760742188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 1.3553409576416016s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.021881818771362305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.00081634521484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-wikipathways took 446.15670132637024s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 60.05405020713806s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.0007228851318359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.3884239196777344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.02093219757080078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 8.845329284667969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-wormbase took 345.7672619819641s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biografías y Vidas took 8.797645568847656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biografías y Vidas took 0.0002598762512207031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biografías y Vidas took 0.2612311840057373s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biografías y Vidas took 0.020380496978759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biografías y Vidas took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biografías y Vidas took 0.0007302761077880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biografías y Vidas took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biografías y Vidas took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biografiasyvidas took 3.602083683013916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.27425646781921387s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.00036716461181640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.6900126934051514s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.02105998992919922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 8.511543273925781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biographical-directory-of-the-united-states-congress took 4.4742209911346436s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.0002760887145996094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.7203192710876465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.020670413970947266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.0007145404815673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biolit took 4.336765766143799s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.0005872249603271484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.2718505859375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.020809412002563477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.0007603168487548828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biolod-pdb took 8.30516266822815s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioModels RDF took 0.7879760265350342s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioModels RDF took 0.0005629062652587891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioModels RDF took 0.2728428840637207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioModels RDF took 0.02093648910522461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioModels RDF took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioModels RDF took 0.0009882450103759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioModels RDF took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioModels RDF took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biomodels-rdf took 4.356220006942749s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 2.572253942489624s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.00069427490234375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.2775707244873047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.0209503173828125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.0007262229919433594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 3.743171691894531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Biop took 8.06647276878357s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.0005600452423095703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.2852439880371094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.020168542861938477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.0007333755493164062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 3.552436828613281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bioportal took 3.008563756942749s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amphibian gross anatomy took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0005640983581542969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.26621317863464355s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.020816802978515625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amphibian gross anatomy took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0007569789886474609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0005915164947509766s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amphibian gross anatomy took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aao took 2.772181749343872s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.00057220458984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.2897312641143799s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.02099013328552246s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.0007681846618652344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.0003027915954589844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aba took 3.1440134048461914s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.0006198883056640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.26764440536499023s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.021085739135742188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.0007550716400146484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.001497507095336914s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-acgt took 2.6928327083587646s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Animal natural history and life history took 5.1975250244140625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Animal natural history and life history took 0.0005238056182861328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Animal natural history and life history took 0.2733151912689209s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Animal natural history and life history took 0.02040696144104004s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Animal natural history and life history took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Animal natural history and life history took 0.0007276535034179688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Animal natural history and life history took 0.00033545494079589844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Animal natural history and life history took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-adw took 3.066633939743042s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.0005903244018554688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.2842528820037842s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.020551681518554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.0007450580596923828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.0004589557647705078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aeo took 2.784562826156616s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.000537872314453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.26290440559387207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.020830869674682617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0007352828979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.000972747802734375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aero took 2.5910232067108154s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AI/RHEUM took 4.673004150390625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AI/RHEUM took 0.0004241466522216797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AI/RHEUM took 0.2925846576690674s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AI/RHEUM took 0.02077341079711914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AI/RHEUM took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AI/RHEUM took 0.0007283687591552734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AI/RHEUM took 0.00039577484130859375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AI/RHEUM took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-air took 2.6627111434936523s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amino Acid took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amino Acid took 0.0005655288696289062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amino Acid took 0.2508573532104492s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amino Acid took 0.020868778228759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amino Acid took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amino Acid took 0.0007476806640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amino Acid took 0.0002512931823730469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amino Acid took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-amino-acid took 2.5770657062530518s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.0005621910095214844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.27883124351501465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.020730018615722656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.0006985664367675781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.0002856254577636719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-apo took 2.6329987049102783s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for African Traditional Medicine took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for African Traditional Medicine took 0.0005488395690917969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for African Traditional Medicine took 0.2659461498260498s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for African Traditional Medicine took 0.02130270004272461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for African Traditional Medicine took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for African Traditional Medicine took 0.0007348060607910156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for African Traditional Medicine took 0.00023603439331054688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for African Traditional Medicine took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-atmo took 2.7035293579101562s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amphibian taxonomy took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.0005028247833251953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.2651040554046631s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.02056288719177246s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amphibian taxonomy took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.0007081031799316406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amphibian taxonomy took 8.416175842285156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amphibian taxonomy took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ato took 2.6550986766815186s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioAssay Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0004239082336425781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioAssay Ontology took 0.26685023307800293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioAssay Ontology took 0.020638704299926758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioAssay Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0006978511810302734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0012500286102294922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioAssay Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bao took 2.636606216430664s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.0005085468292236328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.2633695602416992s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.02073359489440918s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.0007600784301757812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.00035953521728515625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-basic-vertebrate-gross-anatomy took 2.723590612411499s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.00010776519775390625s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.0005781650543212891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.2783341407775879s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.02034902572631836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.0007734298706054688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.0003204345703125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bcgo took 2.5575873851776123s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.00010085105895996094s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.0004286766052246094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.2545759677886963s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.0206601619720459s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.0007352828979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.0014483928680419922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bdo took 2.6329345703125s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basic Formal Ontology took 4.792213439941406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0004885196685791016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.2750873565673828s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.020551681518554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basic Formal Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0007283687591552734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0004863739013671875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basic Formal Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bfo took 2.61987042427063s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bleeding History Phenotype took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.0004820823669433594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.26856040954589844s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.02044224739074707s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bleeding History Phenotype took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.000759124755859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.0007131099700927734s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bleeding History Phenotype took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bho took 2.6155080795288086s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bilateria anatomy took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bilateria anatomy took 0.0005011558532714844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bilateria anatomy took 0.25943422317504883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bilateria anatomy took 0.023806333541870117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bilateria anatomy took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bilateria anatomy took 0.0008370876312255859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bilateria anatomy took 0.00045871734619140625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bilateria anatomy took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bila took 2.477842330932617s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BIRNLex took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BIRNLex took 0.0004925727844238281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BIRNLex took 0.2623918056488037s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BIRNLex took 0.020703792572021484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BIRNLex took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BIRNLex took 0.0007028579711914062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BIRNLex took 0.0014293193817138672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BIRNLex took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-birnlex took 2.6388473510742188s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.00055694580078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.28282856941223145s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.020577669143676758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Regulation Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007350444793701172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007269382476806641s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Regulation Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bootstrep took 2.693800926208496s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioPAX took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioPAX took 0.0005388259887695312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioPAX took 0.2748594284057617s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioPAX took 0.020626544952392578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioPAX took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioPAX took 0.0007073879241943359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioPAX took 9.751319885253906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioPAX took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bp took 2.6030538082122803s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.000530242919921875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.28441882133483887s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.0206301212310791s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.0007205009460449219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.0003247261047363281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bro_x1 took 2.594330310821533s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Spatial Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Spatial Ontology took 0.0005998611450195312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Spatial Ontology took 0.2791318893432617s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Spatial Ontology took 0.02057957649230957s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Spatial Ontology took 2.0742416381835938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Spatial Ontology took 0.0007402896881103516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Spatial Ontology took 0.00019860267639160156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Spatial Ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bspo took 2.660080671310425s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioTop took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioTop took 0.0005285739898681641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioTop took 0.26480937004089355s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioTop took 0.021863937377929688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioTop took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioTop took 0.0007388591766357422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioTop took 0.0006511211395263672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioTop took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bt took 2.613251209259033s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.0004963874816894531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.28824424743652344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.02059149742126465s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.0006966590881347656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.000858306884765625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bto took 2.629336357116699s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0005505084991455078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.3257267475128174s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.020977020263671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0007522106170654297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0017881393432617188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-canco took 3.0825791358947754s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CAO took 8.58306884765625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CAO took 0.00027370452880859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CAO took 0.29448413848876953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CAO took 0.02042102813720703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CAO took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CAO took 0.0007064342498779297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CAO took 0.000579833984375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CAO took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cao took 2.64528751373291s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CareLex took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CareLex took 0.0005681514739990234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CareLex took 0.2895193099975586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CareLex took 0.02056741714477539s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CareLex took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CareLex took 0.00072479248046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CareLex took 5.269050598144531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CareLex took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-carelex took 2.759972095489502s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell Cycle Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.0005221366882324219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.26265525817871094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.02027440071105957s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell Cycle Ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.0007059574127197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.0007660388946533203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell Cycle Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cco took 2.6041207313537598s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.000461578369140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.26954078674316406s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.020264625549316406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.0007462501525878906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.00024962425231933594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cdao took 2.594804048538208s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical entities of biological interest took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0005207061767578125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.28740906715393066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.020523548126220703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical entities of biological interest took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0007963180541992188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0007658004760742188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical entities of biological interest took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-chebi took 2.6897406578063965s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.000568389892578125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.2692418098449707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.020667076110839844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.000965118408203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.0002872943878173828s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-chem2bio2owl took 2.6900436878204346s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical Information Ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0005452632904052734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.2837378978729248s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.020510435104370117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical Information Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0007090568542480469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0007903575897216797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical Information Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cheminf took 2.687934398651123s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell type took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell type took 0.0004973411560058594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell type took 0.2632162570953369s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell type took 0.020475149154663086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell type took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell type took 0.0007390975952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell type took 0.00036787986755371094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell type took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cl took 2.6978673934936523s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell Line Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell Line Ontology took 0.0005414485931396484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell Line Ontology took 0.2778489589691162s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell Line Ontology took 0.020273447036743164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell Line Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell Line Ontology took 0.0007050037384033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell Line Ontology took 0.00081634521484375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell Line Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-clo took 2.669044256210327s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.0004913806915283203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.28914833068847656s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.02032613754272461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.0007543563842773438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.00017786026000976562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cmo took 2.7174127101898193s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.0005381107330322266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.26164746284484863s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.020473480224609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.0007343292236328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.0001971721649169922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cno took 2.6112592220306396s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Wheat trait took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Wheat trait took 0.0005145072937011719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Wheat trait took 0.2826652526855469s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Wheat trait took 0.020753145217895508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Wheat trait took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Wheat trait took 0.0007078647613525391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Wheat trait took 5.340576171875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Wheat trait took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-co_wheat took 2.6738412380218506s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cognitive Atlas took 8.058547973632812e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cognitive Atlas took 0.0004589557647705078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cognitive Atlas took 0.27462172508239746s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cognitive Atlas took 0.020365476608276367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cognitive Atlas took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cognitive Atlas took 0.0007865428924560547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cognitive Atlas took 0.00033593177795410156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cognitive Atlas took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cogat took 2.5824639797210693s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.0004942417144775391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.26154327392578125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.020686626434326172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.0007131099700927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.0007479190826416016s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cogpo took 2.7052218914031982s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Current Procedural Terminology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0005412101745605469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.2765069007873535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.020719528198242188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Current Procedural Terminology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0007052421569824219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.00041961669921875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Current Procedural Terminology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cpt took 2.5966291427612305s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 7.390975952148438e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.0005152225494384766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.33035969734191895s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.0205080509185791s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.0007078647613525391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.0017042160034179688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-csp took 3.037641763687134s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for COSTART took 4.839897155761719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for COSTART took 0.00051116943359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for COSTART took 0.2605893611907959s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for COSTART took 0.02052164077758789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for COSTART took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for COSTART took 0.0007002353668212891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for COSTART took 0.0009543895721435547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for COSTART took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cst took 2.659682273864746s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.0005345344543457031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.2741520404815674s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.020298242568969727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.00077056884765625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.000476837158203125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ctcae took 2.645371437072754s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 6.079673767089844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0005373954772949219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.2673828601837158s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.020394325256347656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0007371902465820312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0004489421844482422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ctx took 2.632235288619995s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dendritic cell took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dendritic cell took 0.0004665851593017578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dendritic cell took 0.2821173667907715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dendritic cell took 0.020589590072631836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dendritic cell took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dendritic cell took 0.0007390975952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dendritic cell took 0.0002837181091308594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dendritic cell took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-dc_cl took 2.7194550037384033s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.0003535747528076172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.25821900367736816s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.020273923873901367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.0007376670837402344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 9.131431579589844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ddanat took 2.6670138835906982s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.0005633831024169922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.25956201553344727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.020410537719726562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.00075531005859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.0009505748748779297s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ddi took 2.559255361557007s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Diagnostic Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.0004749298095703125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.27585721015930176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.02030158042907715s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Diagnostic Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Diagnostic Ontology took 8.153915405273438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Diagnostic Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-diagnosticont took 2.594627857208252s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.0005133152008056641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.26878976821899414s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.020600557327270508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.0007345676422119141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.0001595020294189453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-dikb-evidence took 2.64414381980896s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human disease ontology took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human disease ontology took 0.0005137920379638672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human disease ontology took 0.26563310623168945s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human disease ontology took 0.020276546478271484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human disease ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human disease ontology took 0.0007233619689941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human disease ontology took 0.0006241798400878906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human disease ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-doid took 2.685987949371338s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Electrocardiography Ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.00054168701171875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.25468873977661133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.0204160213470459s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Electrocardiography Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.0007419586181640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.0007760524749755859s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Electrocardiography Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ecg took 2.6714375019073486s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Evidence codes took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Evidence codes took 0.0005190372467041016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Evidence codes took 0.276137113571167s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Evidence codes took 0.020389795303344727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Evidence codes took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Evidence codes took 0.0007064342498779297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Evidence codes took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Evidence codes took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-eco took 2.6463799476623535s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Experimental Factor Ontology took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.0004940032958984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.30855631828308105s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.020305871963500977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Experimental Factor Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.0007030963897705078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.0016748905181884766s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Experimental Factor Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-efo took 3.0152599811553955s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 5.4836273193359375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0004863739013671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.24895310401916504s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.02039313316345215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0011553764343261719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehda took 2.601686477661133s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0004661083221435547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.2750067710876465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.020409345626831055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0007255077362060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0006964206695556641s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehdaa took 2.692275285720825s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 7.414817810058594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0005011558532714844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.26258158683776855s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.020223379135131836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0007290840148925781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0004901885986328125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehdaa2 took 2.570296049118042s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.0004954338073730469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.2626628875732422s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.020441293716430664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.0007338523864746094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 3.24249267578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-emap took 2.6103923320770264s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Environment Ontology took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Environment Ontology took 0.0004975795745849609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Environment Ontology took 0.2584235668182373s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Environment Ontology took 0.020488500595092773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Environment Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Environment Ontology took 0.0007793903350830078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Environment Ontology took 0.00038242340087890625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Environment Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-envo took 2.6225521564483643s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant environmental conditions took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant environmental conditions took 0.0004737377166748047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant environmental conditions took 0.27254199981689453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant environmental conditions took 0.02038264274597168s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant environmental conditions took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant environmental conditions took 0.0007512569427490234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant environmental conditions took 0.00029015541076660156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant environmental conditions took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-eo took 2.6619858741760254s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.00045418739318847656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.2549164295196533s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.021106958389282227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 2.7179718017578125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.0007424354553222656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.0011966228485107422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ep took 2.6292243003845215s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Epilepsy took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Epilepsy took 0.0004889965057373047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Epilepsy took 0.2669804096221924s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Epilepsy took 0.02036881446838379s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Epilepsy took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Epilepsy took 0.0007078647613525391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Epilepsy took 0.00012564659118652344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Epilepsy took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-epileponto took 2.651183605194092s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for eagle-i research resource ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.0005209445953369141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.2914726734161377s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.020262718200683594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for eagle-i research resource ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.0011200904846191406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for eagle-i research resource ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ero took 2.6741371154785156s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0005044937133789062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.2946305274963379s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.020114660263061523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0007266998291015625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.001081705093383789s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ev took 2.631448268890381s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ExO took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ExO took 0.00055694580078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ExO took 0.25161194801330566s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ExO took 0.02027750015258789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ExO took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ExO took 0.0007121562957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ExO took 0.00023126602172851562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ExO took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-exo took 2.657756805419922s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fungal gross anatomy took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.0005381107330322266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.2668030261993408s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.021089553833007812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fungal gross anatomy took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.0008211135864257812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.00012993812561035156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fungal gross anatomy took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fao took 2.6606204509735107s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biological imaging methods took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biological imaging methods took 0.0004203319549560547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biological imaging methods took 0.24706339836120605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biological imaging methods took 0.02067255973815918s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biological imaging methods took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biological imaging methods took 0.00072479248046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biological imaging methods took 0.00019431114196777344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biological imaging methods took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbbi took 2.557774782180786s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Drosophila gross anatomy took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.00023627281188964844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.2475905418395996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.020757198333740234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Drosophila gross anatomy took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.0007297992706298828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.0006320476531982422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Drosophila gross anatomy took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbbt took 2.5355947017669678s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 6.389617919921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.00025200843811035156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.26619696617126465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.020566701889038086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.0007135868072509766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.00042939186096191406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbcv took 2.565694808959961s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Drosophila development took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Drosophila development took 0.0005431175231933594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Drosophila development took 0.2734854221343994s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Drosophila development took 0.020659208297729492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Drosophila development took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Drosophila development took 0.0007243156433105469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Drosophila development took 5.793571472167969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Drosophila development took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbdv took 2.5675106048583984s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fly taxonomy took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fly taxonomy took 0.0004761219024658203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fly taxonomy took 0.2668945789337158s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fly taxonomy took 0.02013707160949707s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fly taxonomy took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fly taxonomy took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fly taxonomy took 0.00035381317138671875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fly taxonomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbsp took 2.677212715148926s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0004780292510986328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.2731308937072754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.02065300941467285s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0009479522705078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0002579689025878906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fda-meddevice took 2.646284580230713s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Family Health History Ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Family Health History Ontology took 0.000518798828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Family Health History Ontology took 0.27437281608581543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Family Health History Ontology took 0.020186662673950195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Family Health History Ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Family Health History Ontology took 0.0007371902465820312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Family Health History Ontology took 0.0004191398620605469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Family Health History Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fhho took 2.649271011352539s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Influenza Ontology took 5.340576171875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Influenza Ontology took 0.0005013942718505859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Influenza Ontology took 0.26305222511291504s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Influenza Ontology took 0.020479202270507812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Influenza Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Influenza Ontology took 0.0007410049438476562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Influenza Ontology took 0.0010221004486083984s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Influenza Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-flu took 2.653766393661499s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.0004792213439941406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.2957303524017334s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.02070331573486328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.0007112026214599609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 6.437301635742188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fma took 2.6001346111297607s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.0004734992980957031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.2756485939025879s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.020482540130615234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.0007419586181640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.00013017654418945312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fypo took 2.6171398162841797s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for GeoSpecies Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.0004849433898925781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.2732276916503906s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.020845413208007812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for GeoSpecies Ontology took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.0007426738739013672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for GeoSpecies Ontology took 9.489059448242188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for GeoSpecies Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-geospecies took 2.6475989818573s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for General Formal Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for General Formal Ontology took 0.0005285739898681641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for General Formal Ontology took 0.27220845222473145s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for General Formal Ontology took 0.020732879638671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for General Formal Ontology took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for General Formal Ontology took 0.0007088184356689453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for General Formal Ontology took 0.0001678466796875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for General Formal Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gfo took 2.615744113922119s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0005207061767578125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.26420092582702637s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.02052450180053711s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0007128715515136719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0005919933319091797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gfo-bio took 2.571925163269043s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Ontology Extension took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0005636215209960938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.2749309539794922s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.020863056182861328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Ontology Extension took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0007331371307373047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0008521080017089844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Ontology Extension took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-go_x1 took 2.5646426677703857s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Ontology took 0.0005574226379394531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Ontology took 0.2869582176208496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Ontology took 0.020726442337036133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Ontology took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Ontology took 0.0009233951568603516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Ontology took 0.00091552734375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-go_x2 took 2.6222574710845947s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cereal Plant Development took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cereal Plant Development took 0.0005135536193847656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cereal Plant Development took 0.26930809020996094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cereal Plant Development took 0.02071833610534668s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cereal Plant Development took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cereal Plant Development took 0.0007090568542480469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cereal Plant Development took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cereal Plant Development took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro took 2.665445327758789s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.0004642009735107422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.2651791572570801s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.020552635192871094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.0007038116455078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.0004203319549560547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro_x1 took 2.5970280170440674s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.00046563148498535156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.2763526439666748s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.02066826820373535s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Regulation Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.000728607177734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007171630859375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Regulation Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro_x2 took 2.6584665775299072s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 9.584426879882812e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0004899501800537109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.29334521293640137s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.020589113235473633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0007724761962890625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0005295276641845703s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hao took 2.670677900314331s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HCPCS took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HCPCS took 0.000583648681640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HCPCS took 0.271195650100708s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HCPCS took 0.020526885986328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HCPCS took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HCPCS took 0.0007145404815673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HCPCS took 0.0002181529998779297s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HCPCS took 1.52587890625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hcpcs took 2.558110237121582s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Health Level Seven took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Health Level Seven took 0.00047469139099121094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Health Level Seven took 0.26664209365844727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Health Level Seven took 0.020893096923828125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Health Level Seven took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Health Level Seven took 0.0007541179656982422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Health Level Seven took 0.0013017654418945312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Health Level Seven took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hl7 took 2.585434675216675s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 8.20159912109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.0005040168762207031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.2563002109527588s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.021117210388183594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.0008440017700195312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.00036334991455078125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hlth_indics took 2.6117966175079346s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.0005133152008056641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.25452303886413574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.021205902099609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.0007841587066650391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 3.361701965332031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hom took 2.598154306411743s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HOM-HARVARD took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HOM-HARVARD took 0.0005152225494384766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HOM-HARVARD took 0.2539865970611572s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HOM-HARVARD took 0.020617008209228516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HOM-HARVARD took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HOM-HARVARD took 0.000728607177734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HOM-HARVARD took 3.2901763916015625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HOM-HARVARD took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hom_harvard took 2.669973134994507s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human Phenotype Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0005123615264892578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.2830214500427246s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.02054429054260254s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human Phenotype Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0007350444793701172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0006206035614013672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human Phenotype Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hp_x1 took 2.670661211013794s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.0004899501800537109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.261641263961792s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.020678997039794922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.0007414817810058594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.0010204315185546875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hpio took 2.6428940296173096s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HUGO took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HUGO took 0.0005280971527099609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HUGO took 0.2501089572906494s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HUGO took 0.020602941513061523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HUGO took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HUGO took 0.0007572174072265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HUGO took 8.273124694824219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HUGO took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hugo took 2.6726012229919434s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Information Artifact Ontology took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.000362396240234375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.25356316566467285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.020694255828857422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Information Artifact Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.0008287429809570312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.0006742477416992188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Information Artifact Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-iao took 2.6077656745910645s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD10 took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD10 took 0.0003795623779296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD10 took 0.24498581886291504s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD10 took 0.020848512649536133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD10 took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD10 took 0.0007171630859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD10 took 0.0008285045623779297s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD10 took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10 took 2.5233535766601562s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD10CM took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD10CM took 0.0004794597625732422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD10CM took 0.25652289390563965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD10CM took 0.020827054977416992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD10CM took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD10CM took 0.0007550716400146484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD10CM took 0.0006322860717773438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD10CM took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10cm took 2.6042847633361816s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD-10-PCS took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD-10-PCS took 0.0005090236663818359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD-10-PCS took 0.24623513221740723s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD-10-PCS took 0.0208432674407959s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD-10-PCS took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD-10-PCS took 0.0007522106170654297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD-10-PCS took 0.00015425682067871094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD-10-PCS took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10pcs took 2.6821277141571045s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Diseases took 5.698204040527344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0005331039428710938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Diseases took 0.26418161392211914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Diseases took 0.02037501335144043s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Diseases took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0007188320159912109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0006749629974365234s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Diseases took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd9cm took 2.624774932861328s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0005819797515869141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.28481245040893555s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.02126622200012207s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.000926971435546875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0005028247833251953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icf_x1 took 2.6478822231292725s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 5.793571472167969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0004775524139404297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.2476491928100586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.02046346664428711s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0007617473602294922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0012450218200683594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icnp took 2.6815032958984375s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Primary Care took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.00047588348388671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.2742431163787842s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.020491361618041992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Primary Care took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.0007486343383789062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.00043845176696777344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Primary Care took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icpc took 2.7179384231567383s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICPC-2 PLUS took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0005328655242919922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.2917468547821045s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.020808696746826172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICPC-2 PLUS took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0007452964782714844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0008523464202880859s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICPC-2 PLUS took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icpc2p took 2.7390995025634766s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICPS Network took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICPS Network took 0.0004513263702392578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICPS Network took 0.2754342555999756s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICPS Network took 0.020674467086791992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICPS Network took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICPS Network took 0.0007708072662353516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICPS Network took 0.0002193450927734375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICPS Network took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icps took 2.6840643882751465s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Infectious Disease Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0005090236663818359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.24808716773986816s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.020641088485717773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Infectious Disease Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0008404254913330078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Infectious Disease Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ido took 2.612806797027588s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brucellosis Ontology took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0004870891571044922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.2751352787017822s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.021074771881103516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brucellosis Ontology took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0007631778717041016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0012013912200927734s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brucellosis Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-idobru took 2.6881186962127686s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Malaria Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Malaria Ontology took 0.0005164146423339844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Malaria Ontology took 0.26063013076782227s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Malaria Ontology took 0.0214841365814209s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Malaria Ontology took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Malaria Ontology took 0.0011916160583496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Malaria Ontology took 0.001512289047241211s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Malaria Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-idomal took 2.606006383895874s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 5.602836608886719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.0004780292510986328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.2531745433807373s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.020621299743652344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.0007181167602539062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.0003037452697753906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-iev took 2.5974628925323486s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.0004658699035644531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.2819218635559082s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.020298242568969727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.0007350444793701172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.0001518726348876953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-imgt took 2.710286855697632s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.00032329559326171875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.27997326850891113s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.021799564361572266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0008826255798339844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0006473064422607422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-imr took 2.7036209106445312s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Interaction Network Ontology took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0005283355712890625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.2665891647338867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.02040386199951172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Interaction Network Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0007436275482177734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0007786750793457031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Interaction Network Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ino took 2.6348061561584473s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Hewan Invertebrata took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.0005056858062744141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.27339839935302734s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.020485401153564453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Hewan Invertebrata took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.0007600784301757812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Hewan Invertebrata took 3.218650817871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Hewan Invertebrata took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-invertebrata took 2.6675689220428467s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for IxnO took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for IxnO took 0.000514984130859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for IxnO took 0.2703554630279541s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for IxnO took 0.020357608795166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for IxnO took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for IxnO took 0.0007598400115966797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for IxnO took 0.00019288063049316406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for IxnO took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ixno took 2.6910905838012695s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SysMO-JERM took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SysMO-JERM took 0.0004811286926269531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SysMO-JERM took 0.28423285484313965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SysMO-JERM took 0.020580768585205078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SysMO-JERM took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SysMO-JERM took 0.0007293224334716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SysMO-JERM took 0.00037407875061035156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SysMO-JERM took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-jerm took 2.7086589336395264s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.00046539306640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.2804231643676758s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.020549535751342773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.0007293224334716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 3.218650817871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-kisao took 2.640002965927124s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Loggerhead nesting took 8.511543273925781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Loggerhead nesting took 0.0005121231079101562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Loggerhead nesting took 0.26686668395996094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Loggerhead nesting took 0.020574331283569336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Loggerhead nesting took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Loggerhead nesting took 0.0007109642028808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Loggerhead nesting took 0.00019311904907226562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Loggerhead nesting took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lhn took 2.5995547771453857s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Lipid Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Lipid Ontology took 0.0005362033843994141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Lipid Ontology took 0.2920200824737549s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Lipid Ontology took 0.0207674503326416s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Lipid Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Lipid Ontology took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Lipid Ontology took 0.00020432472229003906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Lipid Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lipro took 2.699810028076172s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 6.818771362304688e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.00051116943359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.32441091537475586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.020771503448486328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0007500648498535156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.001771688461303711s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lnc took 3.0824496746063232s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.0004944801330566406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.25527453422546387s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.020755529403686523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.0007407665252685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.0006458759307861328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ma took 2.648466110229492s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Multiple alignment took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Multiple alignment took 0.0005636215209960938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Multiple alignment took 0.2727971076965332s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Multiple alignment took 0.020395994186401367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Multiple alignment took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Multiple alignment took 0.0006992816925048828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Multiple alignment took 0.00019168853759765625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Multiple alignment took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mao took 2.689830780029297s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Minimal anatomical terminology took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0005505084991455078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.2494504451751709s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.020532608032226562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Minimal anatomical terminology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0007641315460205078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0006895065307617188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Minimal anatomical terminology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mat took 2.5242552757263184s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Breast tissue cell lines took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.0005061626434326172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.26633501052856445s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.020543813705444336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Breast tissue cell lines took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.0007143020629882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.0004127025604248047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Breast tissue cell lines took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mcbcc took 2.650634765625s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell line ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell line ontology took 0.0005285739898681641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell line ontology took 0.2841634750366211s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell line ontology took 0.02050471305847168s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell line ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell line ontology took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell line ontology took 0.0007691383361816406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell line ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mccl took 2.6354899406433105s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell line ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell line ontology took 0.0004980564117431641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell line ontology took 0.27251529693603516s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell line ontology took 0.020749568939208984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell line ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell line ontology took 0.0007462501525878906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell line ontology took 0.001377105712890625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell line ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mccl_x1 took 2.5985615253448486s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 4.982948303222656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.0004913806915283203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.286327600479126s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.020370960235595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.0007193088531494141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.00023937225341796875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mcv took 2.6738996505737305s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Master Drug Data Base took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Master Drug Data Base took 0.0005371570587158203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Master Drug Data Base took 0.27352452278137207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Master Drug Data Base took 0.023101329803466797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Master Drug Data Base took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Master Drug Data Base took 0.0007693767547607422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Master Drug Data Base took 0.00021076202392578125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Master Drug Data Base took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mddb took 2.6658124923706055s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MedDRA took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MedDRA took 0.0005331039428710938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MedDRA took 0.26731371879577637s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MedDRA took 0.02025628089904785s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MedDRA took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MedDRA took 0.0008089542388916016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MedDRA took 0.0011584758758544922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MedDRA took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mdr took 2.5655035972595215s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0005919933319091797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.2869248390197754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.02045893669128418s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0007371902465820312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0008914470672607422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-medlineplus took 2.6380467414855957s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MeGO took 4.792213439941406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MeGO took 0.00048542022705078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MeGO took 0.27477192878723145s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MeGO took 0.02099299430847168s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MeGO took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MeGO took 0.0008726119995117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MeGO took 0.0001819133758544922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MeGO took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mego took 2.659771680831909s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0005125999450683594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.31217288970947266s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.020597219467163086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.000701904296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.001790761947631836s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mesh-owl took 3.0148205757141113s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mental Functioning Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.0006113052368164062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.24655580520629883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.02042675018310547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mental Functioning Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.0006985664367675781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.0006015300750732422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mental Functioning Ontology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mf took 2.6827030181884766s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0005016326904296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.2661776542663574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.020709514617919922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0007307529449462891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0005812644958496094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mfo took 2.498101234436035s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Emotion Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Emotion Ontology took 0.00026488304138183594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Emotion Ontology took 0.2573730945587158s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Emotion Ontology took 0.020267248153686523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Emotion Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Emotion Ontology took 0.0007529258728027344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Emotion Ontology took 0.0007600784301757812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Emotion Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mfoem took 2.615283489227295s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 5.555152893066406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.00026297569274902344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.23926091194152832s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.02058100700378418s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.0007305145263671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.00011229515075683594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mhc took 2.601381540298462s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Protein-protein interaction took 4.9114227294921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0005230903625488281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Protein-protein interaction took 0.27028965950012207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Protein-protein interaction took 0.020786285400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Protein-protein interaction took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0007195472717285156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0006887912750244141s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Protein-protein interaction took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mi took 2.6281137466430664s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0005249977111816406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.24833226203918457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0204317569732666s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0007257461547851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.00070953369140625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-miro took 2.604522943496704s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Measurement Method Ontology took 5.888938903808594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.0005803108215332031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.2779505252838135s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.020678997039794922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Measurement Method Ontology took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.0007631778717041016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.0001518726348876953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Measurement Method Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mmo took 2.6146764755249023s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MGED Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MGED Ontology took 0.0005247592926025391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MGED Ontology took 0.27011704444885254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MGED Ontology took 0.020596981048583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MGED Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MGED Ontology took 0.0007283687591552734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MGED Ontology took 0.0003769397735595703s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MGED Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mo took 2.600811243057251s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Protein modification took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Protein modification took 0.0004773139953613281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Protein modification took 0.28156328201293945s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Protein modification took 0.02072906494140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Protein modification took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Protein modification took 0.0007348060607910156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Protein modification took 0.000225067138671875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Protein modification took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mod took 2.670337200164795s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mammalian phenotype took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0005369186401367188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mammalian phenotype took 0.2678987979888916s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mammalian phenotype took 0.020424842834472656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mammalian phenotype took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0007288455963134766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0006415843963623047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mammalian phenotype took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mp took 2.582139730453491s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse pathology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse pathology took 0.0004990100860595703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse pathology took 0.29598402976989746s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse pathology took 0.02053689956665039s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse pathology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse pathology took 0.0007486343383789062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse pathology took 0.0004909038543701172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse pathology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mpath took 2.6522257328033447s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mass spectrometry took 5.14984130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mass spectrometry took 0.0005803108215332031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mass spectrometry took 0.28122711181640625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mass spectrometry took 0.0210268497467041s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mass spectrometry took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mass spectrometry took 0.0007302761077880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mass spectrometry took 0.00040221214294433594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mass spectrometry took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ms took 2.6627357006073s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0004513263702392578s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Medical Subject Headings took 0.00048351287841796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Medical Subject Headings took 0.32001328468322754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Medical Subject Headings took 0.020340681076049805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Medical Subject Headings took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0007340908050537109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0018279552459716797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Medical Subject Headings took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-msh took 3.0601308345794678s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.0004813671112060547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.27571606636047363s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.02030491828918457s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.00016498565673828125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mthch took 2.641702651977539s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Natural Products Ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0005116462707519531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Natural Products Ontology took 0.2661595344543457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Natural Products Ontology took 0.02060723304748535s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Natural Products Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0007417201995849609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0007762908935546875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Natural Products Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-natpro took 2.6714107990264893s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NCBI organismal classification took 6.604194641113281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NCBI organismal classification took 0.000286102294921875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NCBI organismal classification took 0.2734336853027344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NCBI organismal classification took 0.020264148712158203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NCBI organismal classification took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NCBI organismal classification took 0.0007810592651367188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NCBI organismal classification took 0.0007905960083007812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NCBI organismal classification took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ncbitaxon took 2.606069564819336s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NCI Thesaurus took 7.271766662597656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NCI Thesaurus took 0.0005185604095458984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NCI Thesaurus took 0.29520702362060547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NCI Thesaurus took 0.02072763442993164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NCI Thesaurus took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NCI Thesaurus took 0.0007448196411132812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NCI Thesaurus took 0.0019235610961914062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NCI Thesaurus took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ncit took 3.029618978500366s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for National Drug Data File took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for National Drug Data File took 0.0004937648773193359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for National Drug Data File took 0.24863767623901367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for National Drug Data File took 0.020638704299926758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for National Drug Data File took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for National Drug Data File took 0.0007276535034179688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for National Drug Data File took 0.0005993843078613281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for National Drug Data File took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nddf took 2.590620756149292s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for National Drug File took 6.818771362304688e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for National Drug File took 0.0005743503570556641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for National Drug File took 0.2676708698272705s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for National Drug File took 0.02038717269897461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for National Drug File took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for National Drug File took 0.0007500648498535156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for National Drug File took 0.0012311935424804688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for National Drug File took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ndfrt took 2.715212345123291s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.0005755424499511719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.2597954273223877s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.020548582077026367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.0007660388946533203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.001207590103149414s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nemo_x1 took 2.5438780784606934s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 4.696846008300781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.00045108795166015625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.27878379821777344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.020329952239990234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0007824897766113281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0006537437438964844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-neomark took 2.6331727504730225s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.0005366802215576172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.2631235122680664s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.020434141159057617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.0007433891296386719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.0001232624053955078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-neomarkontology took 2.6069674491882324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIFSTD took 5.817413330078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIFSTD took 0.0005540847778320312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIFSTD took 0.3217904567718506s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIFSTD took 0.0210878849029541s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIFSTD took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIFSTD took 0.0007414817810058594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIFSTD took 0.0019145011901855469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIFSTD took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif took 3.033989191055298s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIF Cell took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIF Cell took 0.0004839897155761719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIF Cell took 0.25513553619384766s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIF Cell took 0.020693063735961914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIF Cell took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIF Cell took 0.0007302761077880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIF Cell took 0.0013649463653564453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIF Cell took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif_cell took 2.6447036266326904s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIF Dysfunction took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIF Dysfunction took 0.0006306171417236328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIF Dysfunction took 0.24770593643188477s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIF Dysfunction took 0.020205259323120117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIF Dysfunction took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIF Dysfunction took 0.0007469654083251953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIF Dysfunction took 0.001367807388305664s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIF Dysfunction took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif_dysfunction took 2.595125913619995s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0005247592926025391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.25722384452819824s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.020305871963500977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0007469654083251953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0005548000335693359s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nigo took 2.661844253540039s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0005128383636474609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.26706433296203613s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.02054452896118164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0007402896881103516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0005421638488769531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nmr took 2.6586151123046875s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 5.078315734863281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.00045561790466308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.2849998474121094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.020587682723999023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.0007469654083251953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.00010943412780761719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nonrctontology took 2.6730449199676514s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NanoParticle Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.0005366802215576172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.2524282932281494s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.020446062088012695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NanoParticle Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.0007560253143310547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.0011630058288574219s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NanoParticle Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-npo took 2.6356468200683594s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0005316734313964844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.27761411666870117s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.020447731018066406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0007326602935791016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0007085800170898438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oae took 2.6383683681488037s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 4.673004150390625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0005216598510742188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.278472900390625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.021215200424194336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0007274150848388672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0014677047729492188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-obi took 2.635672092437744s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for OBOE took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for OBOE took 0.000492095947265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for OBOE took 0.26019930839538574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for OBOE took 0.020436763763427734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for OBOE took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for OBOE took 0.0007088184356689453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for OBOE took 0.00011014938354492188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for OBOE took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oboe took 2.572768449783325s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for OBOE SBC took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for OBOE SBC took 0.000514984130859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for OBOE SBC took 0.24617242813110352s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for OBOE SBC took 0.02028059959411621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for OBOE SBC took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for OBOE SBC took 0.0007083415985107422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for OBOE SBC took 0.0007350444793701172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for OBOE SBC took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oboe-sbc took 2.593520164489746s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0004990100860595703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.27164459228515625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.021038055419921875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0008265972137451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0006539821624755859s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ocre took 2.6417925357818604s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0004894733428955078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.27457594871520996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.020693540573120117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0007567405700683594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0008294582366943359s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-odgi took 2.6713719367980957s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.00010013580322265625s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.00047588348388671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.26348066329956055s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.020303964614868164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0009186267852783203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0009860992431640625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogi took 2.666652202606201s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.0004906654357910156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.25144362449645996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.020320892333984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.0007460117340087891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.0002906322479248047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogmd took 2.5222108364105225s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for General Medical Science took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0005426406860351562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.24669337272644043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.020250797271728516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for General Medical Science took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0007414817810058594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0006418228149414062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for General Medical Science took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogms took 2.664917469024658s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 7.295608520507812e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0005712509155273438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.27657461166381836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.020561695098876953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0007421970367431641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0011072158813476562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omim took 2.5456888675689697s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 7.176399230957031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.0005321502685546875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.2617940902709961s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.02038884162902832s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.0007429122924804688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.00037789344787597656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omit took 2.585001230239868s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.0002567768096923828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.2606673240661621s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.020455121994018555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.00074005126953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.0005838871002197266s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omrse took 2.350700616836548s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Data Mining took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.0004999637603759766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.2739834785461426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.02197718620300293s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Data Mining took 1.7404556274414062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.0013685226440429688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.0010106563568115234s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Data Mining took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontodm took 2.584991216659546s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.0005035400390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.2671210765838623s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.02051091194152832s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.0007414817810058594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.0002429485321044922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontodt took 2.6122312545776367s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0005071163177490234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.2751462459564209s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.020425796508789062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0007405281066894531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0006103515625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontoorpha took 2.6920993328094482s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.000476837158203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.2615187168121338s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.020633459091186523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0007803440093994141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0009136199951171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-opl took 2.687446355819702s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Phenotypic quality took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Phenotypic quality took 0.0005083084106445312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Phenotypic quality took 0.2695333957672119s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Phenotypic quality took 0.020675182342529297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Phenotypic quality took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Phenotypic quality took 0.0007185935974121094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Phenotypic quality took 0.0008668899536132812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Phenotypic quality took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pato took 2.613596200942993s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physician Data Query took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physician Data Query took 0.000514984130859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physician Data Query took 0.2588210105895996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physician Data Query took 0.020534753799438477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physician Data Query took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physician Data Query took 0.0007188320159912109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physician Data Query took 0.0007917881011962891s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physician Data Query took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pdq took 2.5925509929656982s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Pediatric Terminology took 5.221366882324219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0005013942718505859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Pediatric Terminology took 0.2717108726501465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Pediatric Terminology took 0.020430564880371094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Pediatric Terminology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0007121562957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0007839202880859375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Pediatric Terminology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pedterm took 2.5713326930999756s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 5.3882598876953125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.0004971027374267578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.25463175773620605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.020717382431030273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.0007617473602294922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.00021648406982421875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-peo took 2.5958824157714844s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PHARE took 7.891654968261719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PHARE took 0.0005233287811279297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PHARE took 0.3553760051727295s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PHARE took 0.021615982055664062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PHARE took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PHARE took 0.0011870861053466797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PHARE took 0.0008003711700439453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PHARE took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-phare took 2.7688148021698s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PKO_Re took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PKO_Re took 0.0005638599395751953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PKO_Re took 0.26798009872436523s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PKO_Re took 0.020951509475708008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PKO_Re took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PKO_Re took 0.0007154941558837891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PKO_Re took 0.0001690387725830078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PKO_Re took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pko took 2.582643747329712s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PMA 2010 took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PMA 2010 took 0.0005323886871337891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PMA 2010 took 0.2685861587524414s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PMA 2010 took 0.020696163177490234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PMA 2010 took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PMA 2010 took 0.0007104873657226562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PMA 2010 took 0.0009009838104248047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PMA 2010 took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pma took 2.7676119804382324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 7.605552673339844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.00035452842712402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.25259852409362793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.020786523818969727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.0007863044738769531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.00017333030700683594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pmr took 2.5155794620513916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Anatomy took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Anatomy took 0.00026679039001464844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Anatomy took 0.2585463523864746s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Anatomy took 0.020520687103271484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Anatomy took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Anatomy took 0.0007812976837158203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Anatomy took 0.0003902912139892578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Anatomy took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po took 2.415750741958618s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 5.5789947509765625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.0004374980926513672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.23611974716186523s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.02328348159790039s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.0012047290802001953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 9.679794311523438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po_x1 took 2.4967751502990723s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Ontology took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Ontology took 0.0003159046173095703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Ontology took 0.287839412689209s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Ontology took 0.02096271514892578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Ontology took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Ontology took 0.0011413097381591797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Ontology took 0.0005571842193603516s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po_x2 took 2.56007719039917s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0005295276641845703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.27521562576293945s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.02073812484741211s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0007455348968505859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0006372928619384766s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pr took 2.5762996673583984s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Proteomics data and process provenance took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.0005095005035400391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.2533135414123535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.020621061325073242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Proteomics data and process provenance took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.0008623600006103516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.0002772808074951172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Proteomics data and process provenance took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-propreo took 2.577467918395996s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Pathway ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Pathway ontology took 0.0005025863647460938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Pathway ontology took 0.26177144050598145s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Pathway ontology took 0.020615100860595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Pathway ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Pathway ontology took 0.00079345703125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Pathway ontology took 0.0001392364501953125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Pathway ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pw took 2.6099467277526855s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.0005164146423339844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.2632598876953125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.020496129989624023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.0007441043853759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-qibo took 2.569671154022217s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.0005180835723876953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.29835987091064453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.02068495750427246s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.0007610321044921875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.0017583370208740234s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rcd took 3.1035735607147217s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.0005097389221191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.24980878829956055s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.020694971084594727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.0007817745208740234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.00012874603271484375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rctontology took 2.593428373336792s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 7.295608520507812e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.0005247592926025391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.25910520553588867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.020582914352416992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.0007581710815429688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.00010323524475097656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-repo took 2.6403839588165283s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physico-chemical process took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physico-chemical process took 0.0005247592926025391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physico-chemical process took 0.27454209327697754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physico-chemical process took 0.02066516876220703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physico-chemical process took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physico-chemical process took 0.0007274150848388672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physico-chemical process took 0.0001888275146484375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physico-chemical process took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rex took 2.522312879562378s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RadLex took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RadLex took 0.0005059242248535156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RadLex took 0.28838348388671875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RadLex took 0.020783662796020508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RadLex took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RadLex took 0.000766754150390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RadLex took 0.0015299320220947266s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RadLex took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rid took 2.6930649280548096s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RNA ontology took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RNA ontology took 0.00046515464782714844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RNA ontology took 0.2721376419067383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RNA ontology took 0.0205690860748291s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RNA ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RNA ontology took 0.0007257461547851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RNA ontology took 0.0005488395690917969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RNA ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rnao took 2.641460657119751s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Role Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Role Ontology took 0.0004999637603759766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Role Ontology took 0.26866960525512695s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Role Ontology took 0.02097630500793457s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Role Ontology took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Role Ontology took 0.0009953975677490234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Role Ontology took 0.00023651123046875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Role Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-roleo took 2.615694284439087s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Rat Strain Ontology took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.0005323886871337891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.24639177322387695s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.020611286163330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Rat Strain Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.0007398128509521484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.00018286705017089844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Rat Strain Ontology took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rs took 2.5623185634613037s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RxNORM took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RxNORM took 0.0005373954772949219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RxNORM took 0.2604694366455078s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RxNORM took 0.021381378173828125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RxNORM took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RxNORM took 0.0007739067077636719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RxNORM took 0.0006313323974609375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RxNORM took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rxnorm took 2.5995826721191406s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0005691051483154297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.2565290927886963s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.020584821701049805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0007603168487548828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.00102996826171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sao took 2.573537826538086s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Systems Biology took 5.4836273193359375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Systems Biology took 0.0005033016204833984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Systems Biology took 0.25987696647644043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Systems Biology took 0.02065420150756836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Systems Biology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Systems Biology took 0.0007379055023193359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Systems Biology took 0.0004527568817138672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Systems Biology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sbo took 2.6211981773376465s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.0005509853363037109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.2576878070831299s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.02304553985595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.0008215904235839844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.00011730194091796875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sbro took 2.5997023582458496s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sleep Domain Ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.00046825408935546875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.26357483863830566s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.024004697799682617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sleep Domain Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.0007121562957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.0013320446014404297s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sleep Domain Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sdo took 2.59102463722229s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sample processing and separation techniques took 8.559226989746094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.00048828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.3676891326904297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.021015167236328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sample processing and separation techniques took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.0007231235504150391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.0003407001495361328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sample processing and separation techniques took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sep took 2.728351593017578s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Student Health Record took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Student Health Record took 0.0006725788116455078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Student Health Record took 0.27581119537353516s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Student Health Record took 0.02094411849975586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Student Health Record took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Student Health Record took 0.0007719993591308594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Student Health Record took 0.00047779083251953125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Student Health Record took 1.4781951904296875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-shr took 2.7161307334899902s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0007488727569580078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.27219605445861816s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.020741939544677734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0007154941558837891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0012209415435791016s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sio took 3.4620063304901123s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Situation-Based Access Control took 9.870529174804688e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.0005748271942138672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.2737867832183838s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.0209348201751709s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Situation-Based Access Control took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.0010111331939697266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.0002608299255371094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Situation-Based Access Control took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sitbac took 2.70168137550354s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.0004410743713378906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.30902934074401855s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.020740747451782227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.0018777847290039062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-snomedct took 2.951464891433716s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SNP-Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SNP-Ontology took 0.0002770423889160156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SNP-Ontology took 0.272705078125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SNP-Ontology took 0.020546674728393555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SNP-Ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SNP-Ontology took 0.0007183551788330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SNP-Ontology took 0.0006577968597412109s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SNP-Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-snpo took 2.5720200538635254s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sequence types and features took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sequence types and features took 0.0002524852752685547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sequence types and features took 0.270780086517334s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sequence types and features took 0.020578861236572266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sequence types and features took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sequence types and features took 0.0007121562957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sequence types and features took 0.0005934238433837891s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sequence types and features took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-so_x1 took 2.602435827255249s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0002446174621582031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.32811403274536133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.020959854125976562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0007305145263671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0015513896942138672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sopharm took 3.046376943588257s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SoyOntology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SoyOntology took 0.00048351287841796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SoyOntology took 0.26975321769714355s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SoyOntology took 0.020189762115478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SoyOntology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SoyOntology took 0.0007104873657226562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SoyOntology took 0.0001220703125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SoyOntology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-soy took 2.746652603149414s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Spider Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Spider Ontology took 0.0005197525024414062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Spider Ontology took 0.25606203079223633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Spider Ontology took 0.020437240600585938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Spider Ontology took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Spider Ontology took 0.0007107257843017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Spider Ontology took 0.0003070831298828125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Spider Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-spd took 2.614344596862793s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.0005502700805664062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.3096935749053955s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.0202484130859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.0007388591766357422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.0002715587615966797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-spto took 2.679539680480957s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.0004832744598388672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.27376484870910645s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.020272493362426758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.0007345676422119141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.0004341602325439453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sso took 2.631969928741455s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Software Ontology took 5.125999450683594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Software Ontology took 0.0004208087921142578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Software Ontology took 0.2644627094268799s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Software Ontology took 0.02044224739074707s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Software Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Software Ontology took 0.0007505416870117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Software Ontology took 0.0004253387451171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Software Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-swo took 2.816071033477783s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Tick gross anatomy took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Tick gross anatomy took 0.0006825923919677734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Tick gross anatomy took 0.27449870109558105s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Tick gross anatomy took 0.020246267318725586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Tick gross anatomy took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Tick gross anatomy took 0.0007226467132568359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Tick gross anatomy took 0.00024175643920898438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Tick gross anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tads took 2.589848041534424s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.0004982948303222656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.26098036766052246s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.020444393157958984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.0007534027099609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.0008902549743652344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tao took 2.6504435539245605s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 5.2928924560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.0005190372467041016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.2661879062652588s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.020981550216674805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.0007359981536865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 9.179115295410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-taxrank took 2.5729448795318604s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.0005009174346923828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.2788815498352051s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.020431041717529297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.0007650852203369141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 6.961822509765625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-teddy took 2.6655752658843994s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Time Event Ontology took 4.8160552978515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Time Event Ontology took 0.0005557537078857422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Time Event Ontology took 0.2742629051208496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Time Event Ontology took 0.020369529724121094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Time Event Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Time Event Ontology took 0.0007402896881103516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Time Event Ontology took 0.0008072853088378906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Time Event Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-teo took 2.677582025527954s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mosquito gross anatomy took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0005414485931396484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.27783966064453125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.02087545394897461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mosquito gross anatomy took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0003781318664550781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mosquito gross anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tgma took 2.6692137718200684s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for thesaurus took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for thesaurus took 0.0004658699035644531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for thesaurus took 0.2432706356048584s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for thesaurus took 0.020359039306640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for thesaurus took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for thesaurus took 0.0007345676422119141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for thesaurus took 6.580352783203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for thesaurus took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-thesaurus took 2.642045736312866s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.0005555152893066406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.27510881423950195s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.02038097381591797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.0007154941558837891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.0003619194030761719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tm-signs-and-sympts took 2.675433874130249s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Translational Medicine Ontology took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0005154609680175781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.27631258964538574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.02026963233947754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Translational Medicine Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0007271766662597656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0008018016815185547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Translational Medicine Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tmo took 2.687189817428589s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Trait Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.0004932880401611328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.27341365814208984s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.020826339721679688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Trait Ontology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.0007748603820800781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.00015854835510253906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Trait Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-to took 2.601438045501709s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for TOK_Ontology took 4.744529724121094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for TOK_Ontology took 0.0005142688751220703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for TOK_Ontology took 0.2503349781036377s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for TOK_Ontology took 0.020132064819335938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for TOK_Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for TOK_Ontology took 0.0007331371307373047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for TOK_Ontology took 0.00017142295837402344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for TOK_Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tok took 2.6367363929748535s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Teleost taxonomy took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Teleost taxonomy took 0.0005233287811279297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Teleost taxonomy took 0.2649996280670166s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Teleost taxonomy took 0.02026844024658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Teleost taxonomy took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Teleost taxonomy took 0.0007395744323730469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Teleost taxonomy took 0.00019359588623046875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Teleost taxonomy took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tto took 2.6959967613220215s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Uber anatomy ontology took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.00025916099548339844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.2847774028778076s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.02053070068359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Uber anatomy ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.0007519721984863281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.0010156631469726562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Uber anatomy ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-uberon took 2.629236936569214s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Units Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Units Ontology took 0.0005228519439697266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Units Ontology took 0.2919142246246338s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Units Ontology took 0.02087879180908203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Units Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Units Ontology took 0.0007708072662353516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Units Ontology took 0.00022602081298828125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Units Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-unitsontology took 2.6795005798339844s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Units of measurement took 5.316734313964844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Units of measurement took 0.0004646778106689453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Units of measurement took 0.26740169525146484s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Units of measurement took 0.02047443389892578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Units of measurement took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Units of measurement took 0.0007829666137695312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Units of measurement took 0.00028777122497558594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Units of measurement took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-uo took 2.6298978328704834s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for VANDF took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for VANDF took 0.0005028247833251953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for VANDF took 0.254575252532959s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for VANDF took 0.020773887634277344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for VANDF took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for VANDF took 0.0007505416870117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for VANDF took 0.0007412433624267578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for VANDF took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vandf took 2.6238179206848145s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 5.555152893066406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.0005025863647460938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.25827646255493164s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.020376920700073242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.0007538795471191406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.0004267692565917969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vao took 2.5915591716766357s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.00048661231994628906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.272367000579834s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.020663022994995117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0007421970367431641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0006082057952880859s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vhog took 2.607750654220581s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for VIVO took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for VIVO took 0.0005185604095458984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for VIVO took 0.2578599452972412s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for VIVO took 0.020647287368774414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for VIVO took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for VIVO took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for VIVO took 0.0003561973571777344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for VIVO took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vivo took 2.633953809738159s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vaccine Ontology took 6.556510925292969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0004849433898925781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vaccine Ontology took 0.2674870491027832s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vaccine Ontology took 0.020243406295776367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vaccine Ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0007102489471435547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0011968612670898438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vaccine Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vo took 2.486616611480713s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.0005543231964111328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.26044416427612305s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.02059650421142578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.0008075237274169922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.00021791458129882812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vt took 2.669506311416626s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans gross anatomy took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0004673004150390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.24695420265197754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.020486116409301758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans gross anatomy took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0007185935974121094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0004849433898925781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans gross anatomy took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbbt took 2.642448663711548s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans development took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans development took 0.0005362033843994141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans development took 0.24653339385986328s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans development took 0.02048015594482422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans development took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans development took 0.0007126331329345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans development took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans development took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbls took 2.6265640258789062s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans phenotype took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans phenotype took 0.0005056858062744141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans phenotype took 0.2500429153442383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans phenotype took 0.02043914794921875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans phenotype took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans phenotype took 0.0007970333099365234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans phenotype took 8.749961853027344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans phenotype took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbphenotype took 2.587010145187378s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.00042319297790527344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.24938273429870605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.020499467849731445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0007658004760742188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0006084442138671875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-who took 2.5797033309936523s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Xenopus anatomy and development took 4.8160552978515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0002391338348388672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.2664463520050049s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.02014327049255371s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Xenopus anatomy and development took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0007162094116210938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.00067138671875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Xenopus anatomy and development took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-xao took 2.606797218322754s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.0004763603210449219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.2638258934020996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.020278215408325195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.0007419586181640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.00023412704467773438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-xco took 2.6533215045928955s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Yeast phenotypes took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Yeast phenotypes took 0.0004875659942626953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Yeast phenotypes took 0.2611534595489502s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Yeast phenotypes took 0.02043437957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Yeast phenotypes took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Yeast phenotypes took 0.0007503032684326172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Yeast phenotypes took 0.0002646446228027344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Yeast phenotypes took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ypo took 2.6240622997283936s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 5.2928924560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0005042552947998047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.26527833938598633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.02059793472290039s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0007295608520507812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0007534027099609375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-zfa took 2.5602073669433594s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.0006000995635986328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.2746272087097168s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.02035236358642578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.0007538795471191406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bioportal_link took 3.389496088027954s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioSamples RDF took 0.4491689205169678s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioSamples RDF took 0.00029969215393066406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioSamples RDF took 0.2545483112335205s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioSamples RDF took 0.02051234245300293s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioSamples RDF took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioSamples RDF took 0.0007340908050537109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioSamples RDF took 3.409385681152344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioSamples RDF took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biosamples-rdf took 3.6091439723968506s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.18621182441711426s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.00045800209045410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.28513216972351074s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.02042531967163086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.0007352828979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.00011491775512695312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bis-linked-data took 2.6639726161956787s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bitzi took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bitzi took 0.0002868175506591797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bitzi took 0.2609436511993408s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bitzi took 0.021166086196899414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bitzi took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bitzi took 0.0007505416870117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bitzi took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bitzi took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bitzi took 2.9614076614379883s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BizkaiSense took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BizkaiSense took 0.0002315044403076172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BizkaiSense took 0.2686929702758789s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BizkaiSense took 0.020346403121948242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BizkaiSense took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BizkaiSense took 0.0007266998291015625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BizkaiSense took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BizkaiSense took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bizkaisense took 2.8772459030151367s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for blabla.itemlist took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for blabla.itemlist took 0.00023436546325683594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for blabla.itemlist took 0.28409552574157715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for blabla.itemlist took 0.02028942108154297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for blabla.itemlist took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for blabla.itemlist took 0.0007376670837402344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for blabla.itemlist took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for blabla.itemlist took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for blabla-itemlist took 2.9916093349456787s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for blabla.itemlist took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for blabla.itemlist took 0.00024700164794921875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for blabla.itemlist took 0.27884507179260254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for blabla.itemlist took 0.020255327224731445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for blabla.itemlist took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for blabla.itemlist took 0.0007419586181640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for blabla.itemlist took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for blabla.itemlist took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for blabla_itemlist took 2.954716444015503s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.0006632804870605469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.2792975902557373s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.02027440071105957s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.0007343292236328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bll-thesaurus took 3.640883684158325s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.5094451904296875s
Availability | VoID file availability check for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.0006554126739501953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.2732656002044678s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.020408153533935547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.0007097721099853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 6.723403930664062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bluk-bnb took 12.219037055969238s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.3037424087524414s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.0006837844848632812s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Thesaurus BNCF took 47.71363592147827s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.6843211650848389s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.6155638694763184s
Interoperability | New terms check for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.4811413288116455s
Versatility | Languages check for Thesaurus BNCF took 5.871671676635742s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.8739540576934814s
Security | Check HTTPS for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.09883952140808105s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1326451301574707s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.13664650917053223s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12572145462036133s
License | MR license check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.13045835494995117s
License | HR license check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.22156381607055664s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1390993595123291s
Understandability | Number of label check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.25990939140319824s
Understandability | URI regex check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.2501208782196045s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.13075470924377441s
Verifiability | Authors check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12947821617126465s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12749838829040527s
Performance | Throughput check for Thesaurus BNCF took 10.917041301727295s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Thesaurus BNCF took 7.200241088867188e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1258869171142578s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.13597679138183594s
Interlinking | skos check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.18431854248046875s
Interlinking | skos check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1355881690979004s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12963342666625977s
Currency | Creation date check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.24756169319152832s
Currency | Modification date check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.27158331871032715s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Thesaurus BNCF took 25.516008138656616s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Thesaurus BNCF took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12803244590759277s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.13458013534545898s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1544802188873291s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Thesaurus BNCF took 11.318099021911621s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.51322340965271s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Thesaurus BNCF took 3.8933804035186768s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.14042973518371582s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.7887535095214844s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Thesaurus BNCF took 6.839785099029541s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Thesaurus BNCF took 8.035875797271729s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.5581836700439453s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Thesaurus BNCF took 2.2034342288970947s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Thesaurus BNCF took 2.475752353668213s
Security | Sign check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1195986270904541s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Thesaurus BNCF took 21.685513257980347s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.28798723220825195s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.020307302474975586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.0007197856903076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Thesaurus BNCF took 7.009506225585938e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Thesaurus BNCF took 2.384185791015625e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Thesaurus BNCF took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bncf-ns took 187.6978838443756s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.4628317356109619s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.0006492137908935547s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.7703831195831299s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.507964849472046s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.800215005874634s
Interoperability | New terms check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 4.182138442993164s
Versatility | Languages check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 60.31126356124878s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.309083938598633s
Security | Check HTTPS for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.28344106674194336s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.7565455436706543s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.4856300354003906s
Availability | RDF dump link check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.4622504711151123s
License | MR license check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.6467089653015137s
License | HR license check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 60.327903509140015s
Amount of data | Number of property check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3347158432006836s
Understandability | Number of label check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.7259986400604248s
Understandability | URI regex check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.6329402923583984s
Understandability | Vocabs check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.4315485954284668s
Verifiability | Authors check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.34705281257629395s
Verifiability | Publishers check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3443315029144287s
Performance | Throughput check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 11.663047790527344s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 6.818771362304688e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.28420162200927734s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3275272846221924s
Interlinking | skos check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.31633853912353516s
Interlinking | skos check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.31133270263671875s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3188669681549072s
Currency | Creation date check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.6667766571044922s
Currency | Modification date check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3433077335357666s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 21.494529247283936s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.1457672119140625e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.2836341857910156s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.2006182670593262s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.1027765274047852s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.0298068523406982s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.02378082275390625s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.02904057502746582s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.27436256408691406s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 13.589153528213501s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.40892457962036133s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.332073211669922s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.6876516342163086s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 14.850162506103516s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.031830549240112305s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.32349634170532227s
Security | Sign check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.32688164710998535s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 21.97084093093872s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.3624475002288818s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.021381139755249023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.7642974853515625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.0007345676422119141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.00011396408081054688s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bpr took 416.8056900501251s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brazilian Politicians took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brazilian Politicians took 0.0005061626434326172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brazilian Politicians took 0.2674109935760498s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brazilian Politicians took 0.020514488220214844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brazilian Politicians took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brazilian Politicians took 0.0007443428039550781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brazilian Politicians took 6.532669067382812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brazilian Politicians took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for brazilian-politicians took 4.813711881637573s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BrazilianCities took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BrazilianCities took 0.0002968311309814453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BrazilianCities took 0.25008153915405273s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BrazilianCities took 0.020473241806030273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BrazilianCities took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BrazilianCities took 0.0007314682006835938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BrazilianCities took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BrazilianCities took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for braziliancities took 5.128116607666016s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bricklink took 1.7852098941802979s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bricklink took 0.0007569789886474609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bricklink took 0.7553369998931885s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bricklink took 0.024211406707763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bricklink took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bricklink took 0.0007085800170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bricklink took 6.723403930664062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bricklink took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bricklink took 11.611007452011108s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for British Museum Collection took 30.318580627441406s
Availability | VoID file availability check for British Museum Collection took 0.0006358623504638672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for British Museum Collection took 0.2994046211242676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for British Museum Collection took 0.02025890350341797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for British Museum Collection took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for British Museum Collection took 0.0007121562957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for British Museum Collection took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for British Museum Collection took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for british-museum-collection took 73.67711019515991s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.00048470497131347656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.6936569213867188s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.02028799057006836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.0007359981536865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 3.8623809814453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for brown-corpus-in-rdf-nif took 3.791717767715454s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for French Plant Health Bulletins took 4.696846008300781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.0003058910369873047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.2678806781768799s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.02126312255859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for French Plant Health Bulletins took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.0007460117340087891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for French Plant Health Bulletins took 3.314018249511719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for French Plant Health Bulletins took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bsv took 2.964404821395874s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 2.937453031539917s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.0006365776062011719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.7084028720855713s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.02060389518737793s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 1.7881393432617188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.0007033348083496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bulgarian_admissions_to_correctional_facilities took 8.221123456954956s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bund Offener Haushalt took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.00024056434631347656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.7113378047943115s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.02064371109008789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bund Offener Haushalt took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.0007560253143310547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bund Offener Haushalt took 3.218650817871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bund Offener Haushalt took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bund-offener-haushalt took 3.368739128112793s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 5.14984130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.00029540061950683594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.2813413143157959s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.022194623947143555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.0011894702911376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bundestagnebeneinkuenfte took 3.8260998725891113s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for business.data.gov.uk took 0.3569803237915039s
Availability | VoID file availability check for business.data.gov.uk took 0.0004787445068359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for business.data.gov.uk took 0.2589254379272461s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for business.data.gov.uk took 0.020656824111938477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for business.data.gov.uk took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for business.data.gov.uk took 0.0007030963897705078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for business.data.gov.uk took 4.935264587402344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for business.data.gov.uk took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for business-data-gov-uk took 3.7819838523864746s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4970283508300781s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.0007398128509521484s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.6553459167480469s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.2302098274230957s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.3396782875061035s
Interoperability | New terms check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.7132134437561035s
Versatility | Languages check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 30.195337533950806s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.34572672843933105s
Security | Check HTTPS for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.20573091506958008s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.454317569732666s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.29549384117126465s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.21750330924987793s
License | MR license check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2393507957458496s
License | HR license check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 24.445241689682007s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.45685601234436035s
Understandability | Number of label check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4909090995788574s
Understandability | URI regex check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.5250587463378906s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.226792573928833s
Verifiability | Authors check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.36594128608703613s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.37871432304382324s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 7.557868957519531e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.3196253776550293s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.21051526069641113s
Interlinking | skos check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.28441500663757324s
Interlinking | skos check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2475893497467041s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.28410935401916504s
Currency | Creation date check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.44922661781311035s
Currency | Modification date check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.47687768936157227s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.536052942276001s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 3.337860107421875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.3553028106689453s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.033846139907836914s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.18900561332702637s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.23224425315856934s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.549577236175537s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.034935712814331055s
Security | Sign check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.20495295524597168s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 6.748528718948364s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.6834664344787598s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.0199892520904541s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.0007297992706298828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for BVMC took 100.22718548774719s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.00025844573974609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.6926801204681396s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.02033233642578125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.0008022785186767578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 3.552436828613281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cabbage took 6.372272968292236s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for cablegate took 1.681861400604248s
Availability | VoID file availability check for cablegate took 0.0006737709045410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for cablegate took 0.27160143852233887s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for cablegate took 0.02051401138305664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for cablegate took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for cablegate took 0.0007359981536865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for cablegate took 6.818771362304688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for cablegate took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cablegate took 8.093213319778442s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Calames took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Calames took 0.0006449222564697266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Calames took 0.27422261238098145s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Calames took 0.020496845245361328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Calames took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Calames took 0.0007603168487548828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Calames took 3.5762786865234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Calames took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for calames took 5.103533744812012s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.40418219566345215s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.0002582073211669922s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for CaLiGraph took 2.0180156230926514s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for CaLiGraph took 1.0306029319763184s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for CaLiGraph took 12.750120401382446s
Interoperability | New terms check for CaLiGraph took 1.976715326309204s
Versatility | Languages check for CaLiGraph took 60.26385140419006s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for CaLiGraph took 0.23903632164001465s
Security | Check HTTPS for CaLiGraph took 0.1340501308441162s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for CaLiGraph took 0.2808501720428467s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for CaLiGraph took 0.33771610260009766s
Availability | RDF dump link check for CaLiGraph took 0.25799036026000977s
License | MR license check for CaLiGraph took 0.42548632621765137s
License | HR license check for CaLiGraph took 60.282328844070435s
Amount of data | Number of property check for CaLiGraph took 0.25615477561950684s
Understandability | Number of label check for CaLiGraph took 3.2722530364990234s
Understandability | URI regex check for CaLiGraph took 0.4914391040802002s
Understandability | Vocabs check for CaLiGraph took 0.2540168762207031s
Verifiability | Authors check for CaLiGraph took 0.2554166316986084s
Verifiability | Publishers check for CaLiGraph took 0.23122072219848633s
Performance | Throughput check for CaLiGraph took 11.299384593963623s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for CaLiGraph took 0.017904281616210938s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for CaLiGraph took 0.2225494384765625s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for CaLiGraph took 0.6564130783081055s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.34165382385253906s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.22373509407043457s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for CaLiGraph took 0.2764475345611572s
Currency | Creation date check for CaLiGraph took 0.4951303005218506s
Currency | Modification date check for CaLiGraph took 0.48743605613708496s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for CaLiGraph took 62.418718576431274s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for CaLiGraph took 4.291534423828125e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for CaLiGraph took 0.2418079376220703s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 0.2699260711669922s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 0.2673642635345459s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for CaLiGraph took 0.5235030651092529s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for CaLiGraph took 0.0267486572265625s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for CaLiGraph took 0.027866125106811523s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for CaLiGraph took 0.22475028038024902s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for CaLiGraph took 61.02274179458618s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for CaLiGraph took 0.45909714698791504s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for CaLiGraph took 2.0080199241638184s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for CaLiGraph took 1.2997162342071533s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for CaLiGraph took 61.60714101791382s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.036328792572021484s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.4268455505371094s
Security | Sign check for CaLiGraph took 0.3788297176361084s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for CaLiGraph took 13.876619577407837s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CaLiGraph took 0.26714134216308594s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CaLiGraph took 0.020703554153442383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CaLiGraph took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CaLiGraph took 0.0007598400115966797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CaLiGraph took 8.702278137207031e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for CaLiGraph took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CaLiGraph took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CaLiGraph took 1338.5192728042603s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.21775460243225098s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.0005788803100585938s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for CaLiGraph took 1.8453097343444824s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for CaLiGraph took 1.0486891269683838s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for CaLiGraph took 12.741657018661499s
Interoperability | New terms check for CaLiGraph took 1.9825387001037598s
Versatility | Languages check for CaLiGraph took 60.29590702056885s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for CaLiGraph took 0.21896648406982422s
Security | Check HTTPS for CaLiGraph took 0.12954235076904297s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for CaLiGraph took 0.23076820373535156s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for CaLiGraph took 0.2844967842102051s
Availability | RDF dump link check for CaLiGraph took 0.24158787727355957s
License | MR license check for CaLiGraph took 0.2306513786315918s
License | HR license check for CaLiGraph took 60.28069448471069s
Amount of data | Number of property check for CaLiGraph took 0.22755885124206543s
Understandability | Number of label check for CaLiGraph took 3.0519444942474365s
Understandability | URI regex check for CaLiGraph took 0.499420166015625s
Understandability | Vocabs check for CaLiGraph took 0.22454500198364258s
Verifiability | Authors check for CaLiGraph took 0.2455737590789795s
Verifiability | Publishers check for CaLiGraph took 0.2278881072998047s
Performance | Throughput check for CaLiGraph took 10.684080362319946s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for CaLiGraph took 0.012152433395385742s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for CaLiGraph took 0.24034857749938965s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for CaLiGraph took 0.6402976512908936s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.23921704292297363s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.21611738204956055s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for CaLiGraph took 0.23746371269226074s
Currency | Creation date check for CaLiGraph took 0.47373151779174805s
Currency | Modification date check for CaLiGraph took 0.42577385902404785s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for CaLiGraph took 62.44125723838806s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for CaLiGraph took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for CaLiGraph took 18.5992648601532s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 16.888949871063232s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 12.758241415023804s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for CaLiGraph took 0.8844873905181885s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for CaLiGraph took 0.026551246643066406s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for CaLiGraph took 0.02875041961669922s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for CaLiGraph took 27.03046679496765s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for CaLiGraph took 84.89048099517822s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for CaLiGraph took 18.290766716003418s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for CaLiGraph took 12.486641883850098s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for CaLiGraph took 1.389662742614746s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for CaLiGraph took 73.87636065483093s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.029726743698120117s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 7.909258842468262s
Security | Sign check for CaLiGraph took 14.77328085899353s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for CaLiGraph took 12.71562385559082s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CaLiGraph took 0.9444806575775146s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CaLiGraph took 0.021062850952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CaLiGraph took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CaLiGraph took 0.0007371902465820312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CaLiGraph took 8.034706115722656e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for CaLiGraph took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CaLiGraph took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for caligraph took 3425.7828619480133s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for can-link took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for can-link took 0.0003104209899902344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for can-link took 0.7090628147125244s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for can-link took 0.02058267593383789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for can-link took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for can-link took 0.0007431507110595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for can-link took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for can-link took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for can-link took 5.11682653427124s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.07908272743225098s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.00047779083251953125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.2424001693725586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.02012920379638672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.0007393360137939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cap-italy-rdf took 4.0226171016693115s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for person took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for person took 0.00026535987854003906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for person took 0.27366161346435547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for person took 0.020469188690185547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for person took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for person took 0.0007426738739013672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for person took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for person took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for card took 2.891300678253174s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0006477832794189453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.2419741153717041s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.02097916603088379s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0007302761077880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for catalan-eurowordnet-lemon-lexicon-3-0 took 3.2396328449249268s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 9.179115295410156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.0002739429473876953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.24793767929077148s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.02057170867919922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.0007395744323730469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for catalogus-professorum-lipsiensis took 2.9411323070526123s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.6286318302154541s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.0002574920654296875s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 125.91627383232117s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.9557211399078369s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 8.912107944488525s
Interoperability | New terms check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 17.02289342880249s
Versatility | Languages check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 300.24144768714905s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.203338623046875s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.23708605766296387s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 8.897341251373291s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.264462947845459s
License | MR license check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.4433770179748535s
License | HR license check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 300.20000767707825s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.5225832462310791s
Understandability | Number of label check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.46494197845459s
Understandability | URI regex check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.7731835842132568s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.3745880126953125s
Verifiability | Authors check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.18444395065307617s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.25760412216186523s
Performance | Throughput check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 11.451847314834595s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 4.935264587402344e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.19561123847961426s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.19765186309814453s
Interlinking | skos check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.47272777557373047s
Interlinking | skos check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.47393226623535156s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 5.128732442855835s
Currency | Creation date check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.49434709548950195s
Currency | Modification date check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.22652029991149902s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 169.5651376247406s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.20130443572998047s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.2983686923980713s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.3369596004486084s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 40.373539209365845s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.7615628242492676s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.641223669052124s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.18959832191467285s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 96.14554858207703s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 8.517013549804688s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 34.32826614379883s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.4945001602172852s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 103.02196502685547s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.8066017627716064s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.5364696979522705s
Security | Sign check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.7855532169342041s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 18.617038011550903s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.0702261924743652s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.021728992462158203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.0010712146759033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 5.650520324707031e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.6226043701171875e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Catch_Record_(2014-_2019) took 2337.093346595764s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 6.318092346191406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.0005681514739990234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.7252922058105469s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.02077317237854004s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.0007159709930419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.00010395050048828125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ce4r took 6.376680135726929s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.4169771671295166s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.00028634071350097656s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.6626744270324707s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.6858856678009033s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3227567672729492s
Interoperability | New terms check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.6927168369293213s
Versatility | Languages check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 58.13356947898865s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.13872432708740234s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3706247806549072s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1419539451599121s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1681077480316162s
License | MR license check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.26934075355529785s
License | HR license check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.360980749130249s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1635758876800537s
Understandability | Number of label check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.33881592750549316s
Understandability | URI regex check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.30840229988098145s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1565873622894287s
Verifiability | Authors check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.16902804374694824s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.20554304122924805s
Performance | Throughput check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 10.783761978149414s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.00010585784912109375s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.19435477256774902s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1788926124572754s
Interlinking | skos check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.27814245223999023s
Interlinking | skos check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.13924765586853027s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.2003774642944336s
Currency | Creation date check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.4123103618621826s
Currency | Modification date check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.34944748878479004s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 2.1656203269958496s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1683518886566162s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.13888812065124512s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1628875732421875s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.6057517528533936s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.02763533592224121s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.02968001365661621s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.17127728462219238s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.224254846572876s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 2.0849668979644775s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.322951316833496s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.5150845050811768s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.032324790954589844s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.21924924850463867s
Security | Sign check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1686265468597412s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1702.6523132324219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.3862340450286865s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.02296733856201172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.0007677078247070312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 7.033348083496094e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ceo took 1838.8770582675934s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Charging Stations took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Charging Stations took 0.00022673606872558594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Charging Stations took 0.2640516757965088s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Charging Stations took 0.02180933952331543s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Charging Stations took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Charging Stations took 0.0007791519165039062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Charging Stations took 3.504753112792969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Charging Stations took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for charging-stations took 4.1305153369903564s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chat Game corpus took 4.9114227294921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chat Game corpus took 0.0007121562957763672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chat Game corpus took 0.2597236633300781s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chat Game corpus took 0.020789384841918945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chat Game corpus took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chat Game corpus took 0.0007417201995849609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chat Game corpus took 3.552436828613281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chat Game corpus took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chat-game-corpus took 14.024193048477173s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.0002276897430419922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.7530319690704346s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.02072286605834961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.0007326602935791016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 3.5762786865234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chebi took 3.8670032024383545s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chem2Bio2RDF took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.0008306503295898438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.6838274002075195s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.020817995071411133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chem2Bio2RDF took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.0007424354553222656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chem2Bio2RDF took 5.841255187988281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chem2Bio2RDF took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chem2bio2rdf took 138.10307359695435s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ChEMBL RDF took 0.7489826679229736s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ChEMBL RDF took 0.0010535717010498047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ChEMBL RDF took 0.7499475479125977s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ChEMBL RDF took 0.02042841911315918s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ChEMBL RDF took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ChEMBL RDF took 0.0007719993591308594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ChEMBL RDF took 5.1021575927734375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ChEMBL RDF took 3.409385681152344e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for chembl-rdf took 5.663478851318359s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb  dataset took 1.0459411144256592s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb  dataset took 0.00027108192443847656s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb  dataset took 7.1912102699279785s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb  dataset took 2.4939253330230713s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb  dataset took 1.5282058715820312s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb  dataset took 1.957308292388916s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5288560390472412s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5238759517669678s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5279078483581543s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5194206237792969s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb  dataset took 0.4881749153137207s
License | MR license check for chemdb  dataset took 0.4985225200653076s
License | HR license check for chemdb  dataset took 0.49762988090515137s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5245954990386963s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5175857543945312s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb  dataset took 1.0046133995056152s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb  dataset took 0.4968717098236084s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb  dataset took 1.5002241134643555s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5019919872283936s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb  dataset took 13.435208559036255s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb  dataset took 6.961822509765625e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb  dataset took 0.49173998832702637s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5100114345550537s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb  dataset took 0.4908416271209717s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb  dataset took 0.49997425079345703s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb  dataset took 0.49677538871765137s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb  dataset took 1.0000391006469727s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb  dataset took 1.0301449298858643s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb  dataset took 1.8327128887176514s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb  dataset took 2.384185791015625e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb  dataset took 0.518451452255249s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb  dataset took 0.5341498851776123s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb  dataset took 0.49596190452575684s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb  dataset took 0.5394270420074463s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb  dataset took 0.00031113624572753906s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb  dataset took 0.03462529182434082s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb  dataset took 0.49635839462280273s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb  dataset took 1.0338387489318848s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb  dataset took 0.5837032794952393s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb  dataset took 2.1123502254486084s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb  dataset took 1.3239288330078125s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb  dataset took 1.8198139667510986s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb  dataset took 0.019605636596679688s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb  dataset took 0.5298998355865479s
Security | Sign check for chemdb  dataset took 0.482590913772583s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb  dataset took 162.34881734848022s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb  dataset took 0.8071141242980957s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb  dataset took 0.020650148391723633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb  dataset took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb  dataset took 0.0007002353668212891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb  dataset took 7.796287536621094e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb  dataset took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb  dataset took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-basicInfo took 252.60881638526917s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.49781346321105957s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0002696514129638672s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 7.1582794189453125s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.4849941730499268s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.49555230140686035s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.9458091259002686s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5141768455505371s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4926915168762207s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4906890392303467s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4992794990539551s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5037407875061035s
License | MR license check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4825904369354248s
License | HR license check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.49811482429504395s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4882934093475342s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.521050214767456s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.008518934249878s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4921455383300781s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.49049973487854004s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.48729920387268066s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 13.467891216278076s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 6.985664367675781e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5024175643920898s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5013489723205566s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5126509666442871s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4998445510864258s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4965949058532715s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.9913778305053711s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.9917583465576172s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.8006489276885986s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.48862600326538086s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.49963903427124023s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5066771507263184s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5184328556060791s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0003132820129394531s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.03468823432922363s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5078268051147461s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.9957618713378906s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5391876697540283s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.1133439540863037s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.3478813171386719s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.9211301803588867s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.020753145217895508s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4972829818725586s
Security | Sign check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.48944902420043945s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 165.1201615333557s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.7015106678009033s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.02054595947265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0007243156433105469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 9.5367431640625e-07s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-estimatedProperties took 251.64076161384583s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4903438091278076s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.0002696514129638672s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb phase transition dataset took 7.229490041732788s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.456667900085449s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5230984687805176s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.8953454494476318s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5338654518127441s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5275008678436279s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5303831100463867s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.534710168838501s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5024633407592773s
License | MR license check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4953727722167969s
License | HR license check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4991567134857178s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5309586524963379s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5346834659576416s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.9801657199859619s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5045363903045654s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5003640651702881s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4990358352661133s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 13.931433916091919s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb phase transition dataset took 7.05718994140625e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.48787951469421387s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5305516719818115s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5045621395111084s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4960944652557373s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5004792213439941s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.0222203731536865s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.03029203414917s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.8483996391296387s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.384185791015625e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5068895816802979s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5702259540557861s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.48815083503723145s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5354752540588379s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.00021409988403320312s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.0356447696685791s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4907679557800293s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.0361895561218262s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5668869018554688s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.100588321685791s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.3022446632385254s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.807499647140503s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.020031452178955078s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5293252468109131s
Security | Sign check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5013678073883057s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb phase transition dataset took 170.32357144355774s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.8376233577728271s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.020573854446411133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.0007171630859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb phase transition dataset took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb phase transition dataset took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-phaseTransition took 256.175400018692s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49476146697998047s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.0002713203430175781s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 6.9973766803741455s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.46272349357605s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4959297180175781s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.8899719715118408s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5072057247161865s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4963877201080322s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5026149749755859s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49880218505859375s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49924182891845703s
License | MR license check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.505373477935791s
License | HR license check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5040755271911621s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5112574100494385s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5136418342590332s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.9809243679046631s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.500704288482666s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5041122436523438s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.499190092086792s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 13.4410982131958s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 6.628036499023438e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.502117395401001s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49985194206237793s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5013751983642578s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49579668045043945s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5067274570465088s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.002584457397461s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.9903848171234131s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.785369634628296s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 9.5367431640625e-07s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5094137191772461s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49997496604919434s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49753379821777344s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5029747486114502s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.00030612945556640625s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.04819345474243164s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49399447441101074s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.9738965034484863s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5551927089691162s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.131551504135132s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.405928611755371s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.8951940536499023s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.021959304809570312s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5057952404022217s
Security | Sign check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49819302558898926s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 167.190979719162s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.8835632801055908s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.020678281784057617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.0007388591766357422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 6.270408630371094e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-thermochemistry took 255.99445724487305s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ChemPedia RDF took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ChemPedia RDF took 0.0004138946533203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ChemPedia RDF took 0.25576114654541016s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ChemPedia RDF took 0.02040386199951172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ChemPedia RDF took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ChemPedia RDF took 0.0007436275482177734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ChemPedia RDF took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ChemPedia RDF took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chempedia-rdf took 10.658223390579224s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chiman Maru took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chiman Maru took 0.0002906322479248047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chiman Maru took 0.27739763259887695s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chiman Maru took 0.02068614959716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chiman Maru took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chiman Maru took 0.0007684230804443359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chiman Maru took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chiman Maru took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ChimanMaru_Entrepreneur took 3.7506251335144043s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 392.44389128685s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.0007181167602539062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.25852489471435547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.021114826202392578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.0007236003875732422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 3.910064697265625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Chinese_Red_Classic_Song_Linked_Data_Dataset took 800.5269989967346s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chronicling America took 4.792213439941406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chronicling America took 0.0006983280181884766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chronicling America took 0.6964919567108154s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chronicling America took 0.024761438369750977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chronicling America took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chronicling America took 0.0011839866638183594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chronicling America took 0.00014090538024902344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chronicling America took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chronicling-america took 18.83322262763977s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.7667913436889648s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.0007512569427490234s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 128.9468286037445s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 1.9118659496307373s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.7076482772827148s
Interoperability | New terms check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 6.312578916549683s
Versatility | Languages check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 1.9377710819244385s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.6413364410400391s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3404405117034912s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3120601177215576s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 13.422072887420654s
License | MR license check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3068971633911133s
License | HR license check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.432755708694458s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.30588221549987793s
Understandability | Number of label check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.37401556968688965s
Understandability | URI regex check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.6879973411560059s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3301229476928711s
Verifiability | Authors check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3123593330383301s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.283785343170166s
Performance | Throughput check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 12.432599544525146s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 8.130073547363281e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.30464744567871094s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3171367645263672s
Interlinking | skos check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.32637548446655273s
Interlinking | skos check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3206446170806885s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.31775426864624023s
Currency | Creation date check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.6507084369659424s
Currency | Modification date check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.6499457359313965s
