Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 4.673004150390625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0005884170532226562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.7078311443328857s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.7515788078308105s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0007193088531494141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0003743171691894531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 0080-3626 took 8.605882406234741s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用图 took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用图 took 0.000232696533203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用图 took 0.26854968070983887s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用图 took 0.020550966262817383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用图 took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用图 took 0.0008542537689208984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用图 took 3.600120544433594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用图 took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 10.12041geodata.290864223.ver1.db_ took 3.734236717224121s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 113322 took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 113322 took 0.00061798095703125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 113322 took 0.7097005844116211s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 113322 took 0.0204617977142334s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 113322 took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 113322 took 0.0007345676422119141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 113322 took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 113322 took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 11 took 5.643296241760254s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Korepetycje Buki took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Korepetycje Buki took 0.0002384185791015625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Korepetycje Buki took 0.2719905376434326s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Korepetycje Buki took 0.020293235778808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Korepetycje Buki took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Korepetycje Buki took 0.0006844997406005859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Korepetycje Buki took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Korepetycje Buki took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 12323 took 2.4364373683929443s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 1.1849884986877441s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.0004563331604003906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.2566061019897461s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.020268678665161133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.0007181167602539062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 8.797645568847656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 2000-us-census-rdf took 6.475433111190796s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 2.811619520187378s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.00039267539978027344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.6708168983459473s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.020101308822631836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.0007085800170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 2001-spanish-census-to-rdf took 7.309634208679199s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Open Data Web took 0.29469871520996094s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Open Data Web took 0.0002675056457519531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Open Data Web took 0.25503110885620117s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Open Data Web took 0.01996755599975586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Open Data Web took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Open Data Web took 0.0006947517395019531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Open Data Web took 3.218650817871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Open Data Web took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data.odw.tw took 2.6365103721618652s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用 took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用 took 0.0002346038818359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用 took 0.2606203556060791s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用 took 0.020154237747192383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用 took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用 took 0.0006961822509765625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用 took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用 took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data1.odw.tw took 2.340888500213623s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用模型 took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用模型 took 0.0003349781036376953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用模型 took 0.25235867500305176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用模型 took 0.020185470581054688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用模型 took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用模型 took 0.0006995201110839844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用模型 took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用模型 took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data2.odw.tw took 5.0898683071136475s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Indian Biodiversity took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Indian Biodiversity took 0.0003895759582519531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Indian Biodiversity took 0.2519216537475586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Indian Biodiversity took 0.020175695419311523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Indian Biodiversity took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Indian Biodiversity took 0.0006995201110839844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Indian Biodiversity took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Indian Biodiversity took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _https:data.bioontology.orgontologiesBOFdownloadapikey=8b5b7825-538d-40e0-9e9e-5ab9274a9aeb&download_format=rdf took 3.358605146408081s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.0008304119110107422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.3740079402923584s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.021557331085205078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.0007185935974121094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 4.57763671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for a-collection-of-papers-for-lrec2014-and-related-workshops took 483.9727020263672s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ITS TEST DATASET took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.017251014709472656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.27010154724121094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.020831584930419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ITS TEST DATASET took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.0008978843688964844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ITS TEST DATASET took 3.4332275390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ITS TEST DATASET took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for A1 took 3.7803030014038086s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SummerOlympics took 1.3608877658843994s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SummerOlympics took 0.0013155937194824219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SummerOlympics took 0.26227831840515137s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SummerOlympics took 0.02015542984008789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SummerOlympics took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SummerOlympics took 0.0006997585296630859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SummerOlympics took 6.365776062011719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SummerOlympics took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for abc took 6.361168146133423s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Test_m took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Test_m took 0.00029087066650390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Test_m took 0.2735555171966553s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Test_m took 0.020261287689208984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Test_m took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Test_m took 0.0007069110870361328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Test_m took 2.86102294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Test_m took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ABC took 2.861914873123169s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for my intro took 4.982948303222656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for my intro took 0.00025773048400878906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for my intro took 0.2766561508178711s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for my intro took 0.02035355567932129s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for my intro took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for my intro took 0.0007107257843017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for my intro took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for my intro took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for abhay_intro took 2.435656785964966s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.4552452564239502s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.00047779083251953125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.26105666160583496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.020167112350463867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.0007042884826660156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 9.822845458984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for abs-linked-data took 2.877068519592285s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Academic Offer of UNL took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.0002694129943847656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.2814188003540039s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.02033519744873047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Academic Offer of UNL took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.0007309913635253906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Academic Offer of UNL took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Academic Offer of UNL took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for academic-offer-of-unl took 2.898361921310425s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AcadOnto took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AcadOnto took 0.0006566047668457031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AcadOnto took 0.2829146385192871s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AcadOnto took 0.020392656326293945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AcadOnto took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AcadOnto took 0.0007114410400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AcadOnto took 2.9802322387695312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AcadOnto took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for acadonto took 4.457924127578735s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 9.135632514953613s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.0007698535919189453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.26334428787231445s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.020302772521972656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.0006954669952392578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 3.600120544433594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for acorn-sat took 35.40768003463745s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Addgene took 5.7697296142578125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Addgene took 0.0008130073547363281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Addgene took 0.2574946880340576s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Addgene took 0.020198345184326172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Addgene took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Addgene took 0.0006914138793945312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Addgene took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Addgene took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for addgene took 15.927294492721558s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.0006186962127685547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.28814220428466797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.020465612411499023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.0010716915130615234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.00010776519775390625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aegp-spanish-textile-and-clothing-association took 5.5011656284332275s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AEMET metereological dataset took 30.54419445991516s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.0007147789001464844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.7141547203063965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.020689725875854492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AEMET metereological dataset took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.0007185935974121094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AEMET metereological dataset took 3.910064697265625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AEMET metereological dataset took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aemet took 145.7353994846344s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Agenda de Zaragoza took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.0002601146697998047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.2901160717010498s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.02194976806640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Agenda de Zaragoza took 1.4781951904296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.0009286403656005859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Agenda de Zaragoza took 3.743171691894531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Agenda de Zaragoza took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agenda-de-zaragoza took 3.795839309692383s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AgriNepalData took 0.037920475006103516s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AgriNepalData took 0.00023508071899414062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AgriNepalData took 0.2831227779388428s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AgriNepalData took 0.01996469497680664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AgriNepalData took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AgriNepalData took 0.0006861686706542969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AgriNepalData took 6.389617919921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AgriNepalData took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrinepaldata took 2.5501253604888916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGRIS took 262.09862899780273s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGRIS took 0.0007481575012207031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGRIS took 0.34950780868530273s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGRIS took 0.027397871017456055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGRIS took 1.9073486328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGRIS took 0.0007071495056152344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGRIS took 8.749961853027344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGRIS took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agris took 557.2741599082947s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGROVOC took 0.19041943550109863s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGROVOC took 0.000492095947265625s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for AGROVOC took 31.279457569122314s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for AGROVOC took 0.41785669326782227s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for AGROVOC took 30.076276302337646s
Interoperability | New terms check for AGROVOC took 3.4021475315093994s
Versatility | Languages check for AGROVOC took 30.092865228652954s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for AGROVOC took 30.095917463302612s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for AGROVOC took 0.08807158470153809s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for AGROVOC took 0.0785989761352539s
Availability | RDF dump link check for AGROVOC took 0.10132408142089844s
License | MR license check for AGROVOC took 0.10516762733459473s
License | HR license check for AGROVOC took 0.6315865516662598s
Amount of data | Number of property check for AGROVOC took 0.09622669219970703s
Understandability | Number of label check for AGROVOC took 30.074079751968384s
Understandability | URI regex check for AGROVOC took 0.16953587532043457s
Understandability | Vocabs check for AGROVOC took 0.09028124809265137s
Verifiability | Authors check for AGROVOC took 0.07781720161437988s
Verifiability | Publishers check for AGROVOC took 0.07680106163024902s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for AGROVOC took 7.009506225585938e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for AGROVOC took 0.18634986877441406s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for AGROVOC took 0.1904914379119873s
Interlinking | skos check for AGROVOC took 0.1845567226409912s
Interlinking | skos check for AGROVOC took 0.18691372871398926s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for AGROVOC took 0.1117708683013916s
Currency | Creation date check for AGROVOC took 0.2017369270324707s
Currency | Modification date check for AGROVOC took 0.19294404983520508s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for AGROVOC took 46.97719669342041s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for AGROVOC took 2.1457672119140625e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for AGROVOC took 0.08888673782348633s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for AGROVOC took 19.452564239501953s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for AGROVOC took 2.6333603858947754s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for AGROVOC took 0.08782029151916504s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for AGROVOC took 15.818050146102905s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for AGROVOC took 30.094441413879395s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for AGROVOC took 16.2367947101593s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for AGROVOC took 0.0001437664031982422s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for AGROVOC took 0.1451270580291748s
Security | Sign check for AGROVOC took 0.0884852409362793s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGROVOC took 1.3006412982940674s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGROVOC took 0.020679950714111328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGROVOC took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGROVOC took 0.0007109642028808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGROVOC took 0.0001049041748046875s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for AGROVOC took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGROVOC took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrovoc took 371.7299942970276s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGROVOC took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGROVOC took 0.0003325939178466797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGROVOC took 0.6862692832946777s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGROVOC took 0.020184040069580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGROVOC took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGROVOC took 0.0006952285766601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGROVOC took 5.6743621826171875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGROVOC took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrovoc-skos took 3.846151351928711s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Analytics India Magazine took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Analytics India Magazine took 0.000240325927734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Analytics India Magazine took 0.2835705280303955s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Analytics India Magazine took 0.02030491828918457s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Analytics India Magazine took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Analytics India Magazine took 0.0006971359252929688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Analytics India Magazine took 3.457069396972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Analytics India Magazine took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AIM took 2.9216256141662598s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for All India Survey of Higher Education took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.00023794174194335938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.27004003524780273s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.020360231399536133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for All India Survey of Higher Education took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.0007233619689941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for All India Survey of Higher Education took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for All India Survey of Higher Education took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AISHE took 2.846890926361084s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for  equipment ontology took 6.031990051269531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for  equipment ontology took 0.0002522468566894531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for  equipment ontology took 0.26554131507873535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for  equipment ontology took 0.020261049270629883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for  equipment ontology took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for  equipment ontology took 0.0006952285766601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for  equipment ontology took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for  equipment ontology took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for akash took 2.416799306869507s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.0002677440643310547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.27905750274658203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.02023625373840332s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.0007338523864746094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aksworg took 2.998861074447632s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AlchemyAPI took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AlchemyAPI took 0.0002624988555908203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AlchemyAPI took 0.2580373287200928s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AlchemyAPI took 0.0204012393951416s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AlchemyAPI took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AlchemyAPI took 0.0008778572082519531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AlchemyAPI took 3.457069396972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AlchemyAPI took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alchemyapi took 3.384593963623047s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.00028014183044433594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.2718164920806885s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.0203702449798584s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.0007076263427734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 3.170967102050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alexandria-digital-library-adl-gazetteer took 2.955881118774414s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for aliada-scanbit-net took 1.1794521808624268s
Availability | VoID file availability check for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.0004780292510986328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.2744019031524658s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.020458459854125977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for aliada-scanbit-net took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.00011396408081054688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for aliada-scanbit-net took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aliada-scanbit-net took 4.696129083633423s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Allen Brain Atlas took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.0002522468566894531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.26076507568359375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.020699262619018555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Allen Brain Atlas took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.0007336139678955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Allen Brain Atlas took 2.9802322387695312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Allen Brain Atlas took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for allen-brain-atlas took 2.905416250228882s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.404022455215454s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.0006554126739501953s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 530.1012253761292s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.7086899280548096s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.8336069583892822s
Interoperability | New terms check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 3.919589042663574s
Versatility | Languages check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 300.0087389945984s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 4.153293132781982s
Security | Check HTTPS for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.9249889850616455s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5752997398376465s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.7237083911895752s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5642085075378418s
License | MR license check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5839433670043945s
License | HR license check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 35.914210081100464s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5895118713378906s
Understandability | Number of label check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.8321561813354492s
Understandability | URI regex check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.4490478038787842s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.571990966796875s
Verifiability | Authors check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5846114158630371s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1385815143585205s
Performance | Throughput check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 11.53187870979309s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 7.271766662597656e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5475363731384277s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5634009838104248s
Interlinking | skos check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.0232596397399902s
Interlinking | skos check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.53407883644104s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5785958766937256s
Currency | Creation date check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1651926040649414s
Currency | Modification date check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1137769222259521s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 197.82072973251343s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.6655170917510986s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.941941261291504s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6019034385681152s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 150.66715908050537s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 3.0217764377593994s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.623511791229248s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6363632678985596s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 11.836771965026855s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 8.86441946029663s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 131.95305037498474s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.420060157775879s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 12.264794826507568s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.7690672874450684s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.840712308883667s
Security | Sign check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.115232229232788s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 12851.856446266174s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.7659454345703125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.023354053497314453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.811981201171875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 8.7738037109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for allie-abbreviation-and-long-form-database-in-life-science took 14366.412118673325s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alojamientos took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alojamientos took 0.0002574920654296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alojamientos took 0.7090194225311279s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alojamientos took 0.020490646362304688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alojamientos took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alojamientos took 0.0007059574127197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alojamientos took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alojamientos took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alojamientos-zaragoza took 5.204233169555664s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.27159738540649414s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.0005166530609130859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.26735663414001465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.020560264587402344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.0008711814880371094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alpino-rdf took 3.7435295581817627s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AAT-atawil took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AAT-atawil took 0.0002486705780029297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AAT-atawil took 0.24410653114318848s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AAT-atawil took 0.02039194107055664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AAT-atawil took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AAT-atawil took 0.0006947517395019531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AAT-atawil took 2.6702880859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AAT-atawil took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Altawil took 2.3628933429718018s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.00025177001953125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.2695591449737549s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.020407438278198242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.0007023811340332031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for am-collections-online took 2.9456653594970703s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amer Nejma took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amer Nejma took 0.0002562999725341797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amer Nejma took 0.27290964126586914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amer Nejma took 0.02038097381591797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amer Nejma took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amer Nejma took 0.000728607177734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amer Nejma took 5.698204040527344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amer Nejma took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Amer_Nejma took 2.4080355167388916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 5.459785461425781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.00023174285888671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.2478790283203125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.020450353622436523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.0006997585296630859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for amon took 3.2820065021514893s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.7174820899963379s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.00027179718017578125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.27483129501342773s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.021898746490478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.0007114410400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 8.702278137207031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for amsterdam-museum-as-edm-lod took 3.8552439212799072s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.0002486705780029297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.2710099220275879s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.02103734016418457s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.0008594989776611328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for analisi-del-blog-http-www-beppegrillo-it took 2.938213348388672s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Animal Diversity Web took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Animal Diversity Web took 0.00024271011352539062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Animal Diversity Web took 0.27588438987731934s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Animal Diversity Web took 0.021296262741088867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Animal Diversity Web took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Animal Diversity Web took 0.000701904296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Animal Diversity Web took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Animal Diversity Web took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for animal-diversity-web took 2.9487085342407227s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Anime Dataset took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Anime Dataset took 0.00040793418884277344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Anime Dataset took 0.27482080459594727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Anime Dataset took 0.02064800262451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Anime Dataset took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Anime Dataset took 0.0007014274597167969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Anime Dataset took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Anime Dataset took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Anime took 3.4808778762817383s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ANNO took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ANNO took 0.0005567073822021484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ANNO took 0.2780802249908447s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ANNO took 0.020345211029052734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ANNO took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ANNO took 0.0007176399230957031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ANNO took 3.24249267578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ANNO took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for anno took 8.318753957748413s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.0006031990051269531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.2648932933807373s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.020554065704345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.0007245540618896484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 8.130073547363281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AntiqueCarsCollection took 2.8779361248016357s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for apache took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for apache took 0.0004000663757324219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for apache took 0.25200796127319336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for apache took 0.02071070671081543s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for apache took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for apache took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for apache took 5.555152893066406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for apache took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apache took 3.1901116371154785s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF took 0.0005731582641601562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF took 0.27393412590026855s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF took 0.02009129524230957s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF took 0.0007002353668212891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf took 4.5299599170684814s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.0005924701690673828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.28407788276672363s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.02059793472290039s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.0007176399230957031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-ca-it took 5.673018455505371s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 5.221366882324219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.0006678104400634766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.2827277183532715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.020639419555664062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.0006926059722900391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-ca took 5.6894543170928955s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 8.702278137207031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.0006148815155029297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.27585339546203613s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.020570039749145508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.0006952285766601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 6.4849853515625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-es took 7.502761125564575s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.0005865097045898438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.30399179458618164s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.020354509353637695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.0007171630859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-gl took 5.607352256774902s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.0003974437713623047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.27503180503845215s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.020635128021240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.0007123947143554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-ca took 5.650832414627075s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.0002880096435546875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.2525746822357178s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.020618438720703125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.0007441043853759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-en took 5.642696142196655s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.0005459785461425781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.30262207984924316s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.020397424697875977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.0007023811340332031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-es took 5.730168581008911s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.0005950927734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.2677154541015625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.020569324493408203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.0007195472717285156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-fr took 5.537821531295776s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.0007121562957763672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.24526143074035645s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.02036762237548828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.0006947517395019531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-an took 5.604117393493652s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.000640869140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.2637639045715332s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.02069878578186035s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.0006988048553466797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ast took 5.747843265533447s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.0007159709930419922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.27239227294921875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.020853519439697266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.0007150173187255859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ca took 24.8170108795166s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.0005941390991210938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.2689669132232666s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.020620107650756836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.0007054805755615234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 4.887580871582031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-gl took 5.5679473876953125s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.0006012916564941406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.2512552738189697s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.020953655242919922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.0006976127624511719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-pt took 6.087337255477905s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.00060272216796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.27327585220336914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.02030324935913086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.0006961822509765625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ro took 5.637228727340698s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.0005681514739990234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.25924158096313477s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.02065110206604004s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.0007302761077880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eu-en took 5.634010314941406s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.0006234645843505859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.2561049461364746s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.020568370819091797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eu-es took 5.6731157302856445s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.0005533695220947266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.25935959815979004s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.02017998695373535s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.0007061958312988281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 4.57763671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-fr-ca took 5.625488042831421s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.0005893707275390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.2868504524230957s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.02037811279296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.0007011890411376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-fr-es took 5.671097755432129s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.0005519390106201172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.24922609329223633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.020262956619262695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.0007350444793701172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-oc-ca took 5.524868965148926s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.000720977783203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.23945379257202148s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.021661758422851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.0007252693176269531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-oc-es took 5.651421308517456s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 4.887580871582031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.0005905628204345703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.2818894386291504s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.020679235458374023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.0007262229919433594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-pt-ca took 6.271556854248047s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.0005664825439453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.2658534049987793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.02055048942565918s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.0007245540618896484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-pt-gl took 6.465225696563721s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AragoDBPedia took 0.6810147762298584s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AragoDBPedia took 0.0012736320495605469s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for AragoDBPedia took 4.481002330780029s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for AragoDBPedia took 2.028785467147827s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for AragoDBPedia took 0.9195654392242432s
Interoperability | New terms check for AragoDBPedia took 2.2964913845062256s
Versatility | Languages check for AragoDBPedia took 60.56419134140015s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for AragoDBPedia took 5.258321523666382s
Security | Check HTTPS for AragoDBPedia took 0.26114368438720703s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for AragoDBPedia took 0.8630540370941162s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for AragoDBPedia took 1.0479466915130615s
Availability | RDF dump link check for AragoDBPedia took 0.7223668098449707s
License | MR license check for AragoDBPedia took 0.6816344261169434s
License | HR license check for AragoDBPedia took 6.559642791748047s
Amount of data | Number of property check for AragoDBPedia took 0.44757986068725586s
Understandability | Number of label check for AragoDBPedia took 0.6137800216674805s
Understandability | URI regex check for AragoDBPedia took 0.9994463920593262s
Understandability | Vocabs check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4663660526275635s
Verifiability | Authors check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5019581317901611s
Verifiability | Publishers check for AragoDBPedia took 0.41472697257995605s
Performance | Throughput check for AragoDBPedia took 12.082848310470581s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for AragoDBPedia took 7.987022399902344e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5014314651489258s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for AragoDBPedia took 0.48973512649536133s
Interlinking | skos check for AragoDBPedia took 0.6362819671630859s
Interlinking | skos check for AragoDBPedia took 0.41502857208251953s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for AragoDBPedia took 0.517223596572876s
Currency | Creation date check for AragoDBPedia took 1.9171888828277588s
Currency | Modification date check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4531540870666504s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for AragoDBPedia took 6.4520487785339355s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for AragoDBPedia took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for AragoDBPedia took 0.3974320888519287s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for AragoDBPedia took 0.5194313526153564s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for AragoDBPedia took 0.49788904190063477s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for AragoDBPedia took 1.417853593826294s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for AragoDBPedia took 0.02702617645263672s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for AragoDBPedia took 0.028008699417114258s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for AragoDBPedia took 0.3971598148345947s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for AragoDBPedia took 4.734260082244873s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for AragoDBPedia took 0.6088414192199707s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for AragoDBPedia took 2.827423572540283s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for AragoDBPedia took 1.3249330520629883s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for AragoDBPedia took 5.510309457778931s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for AragoDBPedia took 0.03378176689147949s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for AragoDBPedia took 0.6758730411529541s
Security | Sign check for AragoDBPedia took 0.6437516212463379s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for AragoDBPedia took 3318.2557241916656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AragoDBPedia took 1.4118378162384033s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AragoDBPedia took 0.023827791213989258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AragoDBPedia took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AragoDBPedia took 0.0007598400115966797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AragoDBPedia took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for AragoDBPedia took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AragoDBPedia took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aragodbpedia took 17598.04114317894s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archives Hub Linked Data took 30.213985681533813s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.0008077621459960938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.7117936611175537s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.02123403549194336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archives Hub Linked Data took 2.6941299438476562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.0015950202941894531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archives Hub Linked Data took 8.344650268554688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archives Hub Linked Data took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for archiveshub-linkeddata took 85.24322485923767s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archivi ISMA took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archivi ISMA took 0.00026154518127441406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archivi ISMA took 0.7036488056182861s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archivi ISMA took 0.020585060119628906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archivi ISMA took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archivi ISMA took 0.0007178783416748047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archivi ISMA took 2.9802322387695312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archivi ISMA took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for archivio-isma took 4.19561243057251s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ARIADNE took 4.696846008300781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ARIADNE took 0.0002701282501220703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ARIADNE took 0.7175822257995605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ARIADNE took 0.020578622817993164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ARIADNE took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ARIADNE took 0.0007169246673583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ARIADNE took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ARIADNE took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ariadne took 4.263773202896118s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Aristotle University took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Aristotle University took 0.0002548694610595703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Aristotle University took 0.26705098152160645s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Aristotle University took 0.020439863204956055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Aristotle University took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Aristotle University took 0.0007185935974121094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Aristotle University took 2.9802322387695312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Aristotle University took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aristotle-university took 3.3333966732025146s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 4.425362586975098s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.0003657341003417969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.24253273010253906s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.02126789093017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.0009369850158691406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 3.7670135498046875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress-e-afmx-1 took 23.708221435546875s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 3.910064697265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.0002791881561279297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.2659587860107422s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.020557165145874023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.0007112026214599609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress_e-afmx-4 took 3.8055782318115234s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 4.540842533111572s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.0006000995635986328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.2750511169433594s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.020240306854248047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.0007150173187255859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 3.4332275390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress_e-mtab-104 took 18.445133447647095s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.0006430149078369141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.24454975128173828s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.020426511764526367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.0007092952728271484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 9.751319885253906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for artenuevosmedios-gnoss took 9.700528383255005s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.0002434253692626953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.2765190601348877s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.020165681838989258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.0006949901580810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Arthron took 2.8348419666290283s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Arthroscopy community took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Arthroscopy community took 0.0005192756652832031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Arthroscopy community took 0.2656857967376709s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Arthroscopy community took 0.020414113998413086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Arthroscopy community took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Arthroscopy community took 0.0006909370422363281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Arthroscopy community took 9.703636169433594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Arthroscopy community took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arthroscopy took 3.5007550716400146s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.8065183162689209s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0004911422729492188s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08740425109863281s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08785390853881836s
Versatility | Languages check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09508657455444336s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0717470645904541s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0929725170135498s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09783792495727539s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.07462286949157715s
License | MR license check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08424663543701172s
License | HR license check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0969991683959961s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09229660034179688s
Understandability | Number of label check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.07162237167358398s
Understandability | URI regex check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.1572132110595703s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0836024284362793s
Verifiability | Authors check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0857400894165039s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09546279907226562s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.00014257431030273438s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08340764045715332s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08386373519897461s
Interlinking | skos check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.07048988342285156s
Interlinking | skos check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08242368698120117s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09685659408569336s
Currency | Creation date check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.15544533729553223s
Currency | Modification date check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.16797423362731934s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.1799182891845703s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 9.5367431640625e-07s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.07191300392150879s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08206295967102051s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08197426795959473s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.3975591659545898s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.00014209747314453125s
Security | Sign check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.08206582069396973s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.262876033782959s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.02037787437438965s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.4781951904296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0006995201110839844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 4.76837158203125e-07s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for artxscienceinternational-wikidata took 20.57057809829712s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 3.004098415374756s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.0013432502746582031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.2768869400024414s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.02024078369140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.000705718994140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 7.557868957519531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-_NTM-Formosan-Aborigines took 11.853036880493164s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 2.229560613632202s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.0015025138854980469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.26771044731140137s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.020545482635498047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.0007283687591552734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 7.557868957519531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks took 10.612504482269287s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 2.238020896911621s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.000701904296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.27611875534057617s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.020500898361206055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.0007097721099853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 8.392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-AS-TFD-Fish-Species took 11.611587524414062s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 2.2392821311950684s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.0006051063537597656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.2727935314178467s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.020508289337158203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.0007081031799316406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-CRB took 13.63765549659729s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 2.2543933391571045s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.0005865097045898438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.3250010013580322s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.020494461059570312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 1.811981201171875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.0007233619689941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 9.083747863769531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-CTS-TV-Programs took 11.151830434799194s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 2.2173550128936768s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.0006084442138671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.29071545600891113s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.02044057846069336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.0007023811340332031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-DQOT took 12.048933744430542s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 2.2214818000793457s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.00061798095703125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.25382184982299805s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.020337343215942383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.0006923675537109375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 7.462501525878906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-IHP-WCD took 12.13843059539795s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 3.7565433979034424s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.0005986690521240234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.26828575134277344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.02034902572631836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.0006985664367675781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 7.796287536621094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Linked-Taiwan-Artists took 13.61064624786377s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 2.2393550872802734s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.000640869140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.2722914218902588s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.02036571502685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.0007393360137939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 5.364418029785156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan took 11.053520917892456s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 2.243143320083618s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.0006134510040283203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.27445387840270996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.02053236961364746s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.0007271766662597656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 4.982948303222656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths took 11.078099012374878s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 3.6625471115112305s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.0006420612335205078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.2638113498687744s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.02062392234802246s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.0007011890411376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Qing-Secret-Societies took 15.25760555267334s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 2.2403502464294434s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.0006983280181884766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.26234936714172363s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.021387815475463867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.0006966590881347656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 7.939338684082031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Tibetan-Audio-Archive took 10.61355447769165s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 2.2297322750091553s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.0006809234619140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.26080846786499023s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.020383358001708984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.0007405281066894531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 7.653236389160156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC_-_CCP_Archive took 12.08165431022644s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 2.223381996154785s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.0006701946258544922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.27994251251220703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.02046966552734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.0009932518005371094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 5.698204040527344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC_-_DNB took 10.585547924041748s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.0006155967712402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.2809453010559082s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.0205843448638916s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.0007042884826660156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 6.580352783203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asit took 8.421612024307251s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.0006241798400878906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.25975942611694336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.020765066146850586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 3.7670135498046875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asjp took 5.235375165939331s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ASN:US took 523.8615546226501s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ASN:US took 0.0009109973907470703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ASN:US took 1.3301169872283936s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ASN:US took 0.02185344696044922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ASN:US took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ASN:US took 0.0007147789001464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ASN:US took 7.367134094238281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ASN:US took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asn-us took 1343.2666022777557s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 5.4836273193359375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.0006220340728759766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.6921453475952148s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.021210432052612305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.0007452964782714844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aspire-mmu took 6.716326951980591s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for associations took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for associations took 0.0007114410400390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for associations took 0.7098839282989502s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for associations took 0.020320653915405273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for associations took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for associations took 0.0006911754608154297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for associations took 6.103515625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for associations took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for associations took 8.799912691116333s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 5.1975250244140625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.00024080276489257812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.2782886028289795s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.020388364791870117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.0008184909820556641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for atc-publikovan--s-kl took 3.431210994720459s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.0006682872772216797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.26390933990478516s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.02078390121459961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.0007028579711914062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.00010848045349121094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for athelia-rfid took 4.951397895812988s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 7.200241088867188e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.0006449222564697266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.29235386848449707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.03099513053894043s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 2.09808349609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.0007190704345703125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 1.811981201171875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for auditsocials-glossary took 4.1671693325042725s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AUEB Linked Open Data took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.000244140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.2596468925476074s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.02284097671508789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AUEB Linked Open Data took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.0011284351348876953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AUEB Linked Open Data took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AUEB Linked Open Data took 3.504753112792969e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for aueb-linked-open-data took 3.404230833053589s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.570298433303833s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.001508951187133789s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.3004031181335449s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.020312786102294922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.0006978511810302734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 4.57763671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AugustiniConfessiones took 3.987480640411377s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.4976770877838135s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.0005209445953369141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.2659122943878174s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.020412445068359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.0007109642028808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 8.940696716308594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for austrian_ski_racers took 3.5921685695648193s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AVsOnto took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AVsOnto took 0.00046133995056152344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AVsOnto took 0.27552223205566406s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AVsOnto took 0.020781993865966797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AVsOnto took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AVsOnto took 0.0007448196411132812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AVsOnto took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AVsOnto took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AVsOnto took 3.4316606521606445s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 30.084139585494995s
Availability | VoID file availability check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.0006191730499267578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.2501552104949951s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.020358800888061523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.0007312297821044922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 6.389617919921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for b3kat took 152.69495916366577s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BabelNet took 0.40343475341796875s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BabelNet took 0.0003299713134765625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BabelNet took 0.2704324722290039s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BabelNet took 0.02041029930114746s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BabelNet took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BabelNet took 0.0007002353668212891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BabelNet took 0.00015592575073242188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BabelNet took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for babelnet took 6.035858631134033s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bacevicius.lt took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bacevicius.lt took 0.0002429485321044922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bacevicius.lt took 0.2479233741760254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bacevicius.lt took 0.02036142349243164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bacevicius.lt took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bacevicius.lt took 0.0007047653198242188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bacevicius.lt took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bacevicius.lt took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bacevicius.lt took 2.746945381164551s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.5120813846588135s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.00024509429931640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.2668142318725586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.020432233810424805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.0007364749908447266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bag took 4.297084331512451s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.590418815612793s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0002372264862060547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.2673945426940918s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.020270109176635742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0007169246673583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue took 3.021409034729004s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for baixue composer took 8.702278137207031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for baixue composer took 0.00043582916259765625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for baixue composer took 0.25704240798950195s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for baixue composer took 0.020923376083374023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for baixue composer took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for baixue composer took 0.0007429122924804688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for baixue composer took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for baixue composer took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_composer took 2.874748706817627s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.00035500526428222656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.2574162483215332s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.020258426666259766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0007274150848388672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_imagery took 3.1820576190948486s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 5.459785461425781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0005922317504882812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.28181958198547363s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.02111363410949707s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0007176399230957031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_imagery1 took 3.702450752258301s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BAMS took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BAMS took 0.0003695487976074219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BAMS took 0.27834033966064453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BAMS took 0.020519495010375977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BAMS took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BAMS took 0.0007045269012451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BAMS took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BAMS took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bams took 2.895905017852783s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0006344318389892578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.2532675266265869s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.020959854125976562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0009577274322509766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for basque-eurowordnet-lemon-lexicon-3-0 took 2.922639846801758s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Music took 0.29273343086242676s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Music took 0.0007348060607910156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Music took 0.2856111526489258s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Music took 0.020435094833374023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Music took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Music took 0.0007195472717285156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Music took 0.00012612342834472656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Music took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-music took 3.4052083492279053s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Programmes took 0.2951931953430176s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Programmes took 0.0006830692291259766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Programmes took 0.26934242248535156s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Programmes took 0.021041393280029297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Programmes took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Programmes took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Programmes took 0.00010347366333007812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Programmes took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-programmes took 11.407681703567505s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.3344118595123291s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.0010578632354736328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.2889747619628906s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.020305871963500977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Wildlife Finder took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.0007224082946777344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.00010013580322265625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Wildlife Finder took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-wildlife-finder took 10.207809925079346s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBOP took 3.886222839355469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBOP took 0.00024127960205078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBOP took 0.2700979709625244s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBOP took 0.020659923553466797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBOP took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBOP took 0.0007350444793701172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBOP took 3.361701965332031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBOP took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbop took 2.9024343490600586s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBOP took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBOP took 0.0009672641754150391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBOP took 0.2797825336456299s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBOP took 0.020598888397216797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBOP took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBOP took 0.0007131099700927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBOP took 3.5762786865234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBOP took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbop-selected took 20.253901720046997s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bdgp took 1.752342700958252s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bdgp took 0.00046253204345703125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bdgp took 0.26439476013183594s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bdgp took 0.02075672149658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bdgp took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bdgp took 0.0007011890411376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bdgp took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bdgp took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bdgp took 8.856642961502075s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bendev Junior took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bendev Junior took 0.000545501708984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bendev Junior took 0.26450014114379883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bendev Junior took 0.020342588424682617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bendev Junior took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bendev Junior took 0.0007166862487792969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bendev Junior took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bendev Junior took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bendevoficial took 5.545797824859619s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 4.982803583145142s
Availability | VoID file availability check for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.0006604194641113281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.29021453857421875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.020423412322998047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.0007014274597167969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 6.508827209472656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for beneficiaries-of-the-european-commission took 13.532034635543823s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.0002627372741699219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.2474207878112793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.02043628692626953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.0007431507110595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for berlin-offener-haushalt took 2.939768075942993s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for berlios took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for berlios took 0.0005269050598144531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for berlios took 0.28801441192626953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for berlios took 0.020662546157836914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for berlios took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for berlios took 0.0006992816925048828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for berlios took 8.7738037109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for berlios took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for berlios took 2.6952619552612305s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Between Our Worlds took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Between Our Worlds took 0.0006527900695800781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Between Our Worlds took 0.31280040740966797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Between Our Worlds took 0.020854949951171875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Between Our Worlds took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Between Our Worlds took 0.0007364749908447266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Between Our Worlds took 6.937980651855469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Between Our Worlds took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for betweenourworlds took 9.588794231414795s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.2757570743560791s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.0005362033843994141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.28487539291381836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.02063441276550293s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.0007474422454833984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.00010371208190917969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bfs-linked-data took 2.8974809646606445s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BibBase took 0.06942987442016602s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BibBase took 0.0003578662872314453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BibBase took 0.27511143684387207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BibBase took 0.020665407180786133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BibBase took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BibBase took 0.0007181167602539062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BibBase took 9.393692016601562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BibBase took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bibbase took 2.508441925048828s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.0005259513854980469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.26793789863586426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.020311832427978516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.0007281303405761719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 9.34600830078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-escolar-digital-cita took 5.531540632247925s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.0005991458892822266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.2712709903717041s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.02038717269897461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.0007376670837402344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 9.632110595703125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-nacional-escolar-bnescolar took 3.0330612659454346s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.00025010108947753906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.2659621238708496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.020580291748046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.0007405281066894531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-virtual-miguel-de-cervantes-bvmc-linked-open-data took 2.9343600273132324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.0006670951843261719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.2651350498199463s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.02058267593383789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.0007750988006591797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 3.4809112548828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for BibSonomy took 9.355311393737793s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.0011446475982666016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.2877840995788574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.020398378372192383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.0007011890411376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for billion_triples_challenge_dataset2008 took 4.910261631011963s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 6.699562072753906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.0005254745483398438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.2732834815979004s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.02068805694580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.0007505416870117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 3.170967102050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for billion_triples_challenge_dataset_2010 took 2.6108357906341553s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 7.009506225585938e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.0002522468566894531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.24822354316711426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.020517826080322266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.0007460117340087891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-acfsid took 2.9372339248657227s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 39.02336525917053s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.0005311965942382812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.26462364196777344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.020588397979736328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.0023508071899414062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.00023698806762695312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-affymetrix took 139.06968426704407s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 39.03022074699402s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.0005519390106201172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.26711273193359375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.020971059799194336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.0007469654083251953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.00011301040649414062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-biomodels took 139.98299264907837s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.00026488304138183594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.2683885097503662s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.02041769027709961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.0007116794586181641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 2.9802322387695312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-biomodels-biopax took 2.9152700901031494s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 39.02349042892456s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.00031495094299316406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.3076589107513428s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.0209963321685791s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.0007450580596923828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.0004038810729980469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-bioportal took 181.06472158432007s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 39.020909547805786s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.0005147457122802734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 1.2303524017333984s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.020859956741333008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.0007081031799316406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 5.817413330078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-chembl took 181.1370689868927s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 39.01950645446777s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.0006687641143798828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.7029197216033936s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.0207521915435791s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 1.811981201171875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.000736236572265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 5.269050598144531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-clinicaltrials took 180.31222081184387s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 39.020554065704346s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.0005617141723632812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 1.3847410678863525s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.02097010612487793s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.0007188320159912109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 6.604194641113281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ctd took 142.07523894309998s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-dataset took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.0006439685821533203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.2749207019805908s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.0208587646484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-dataset took 1.71661376953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.0007271766662597656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-dataset took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-dataset took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-dataset took 23.75335431098938s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 39.02153968811035s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.0006761550903320312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.24364018440246582s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.02081751823425293s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.0007195472717285156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 6.699562072753906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-dbsnp took 180.452228307724s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 39.02442169189453s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.0002925395965576172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.3264639377593994s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.020882368087768555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.0007207393646240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.00010633468627929688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-drugbank took 140.2479248046875s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 39.022743701934814s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.0005514621734619141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.2590315341949463s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.020618677139282227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Genage took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.0014920234680175781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Genage took 5.555152893066406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Genage took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-genage took 179.53945398330688s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.0002987384796142578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.6906845569610596s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.02096390724182129s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.0007135868072509766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 6.365776062011719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-genbank took 4.173999309539795s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 39.01844263076782s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.0004982948303222656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.7711598873138428s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.02063441276550293s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.0007131099700927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 5.316734313964844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-gendr took 180.57788801193237s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 39.02242827415466s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.0005397796630859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.704064130783081s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.03748297691345215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Goa took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.0007228851318359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Goa took 6.723403930664062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Goa took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-goa took 141.219642162323s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 39.024171113967896s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.00054168701171875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.7164103984832764s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.02059316635131836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.0007128715515136719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.00010061264038085938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-hgnc took 141.60434865951538s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 39.02141976356506s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.0005457401275634766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.2550039291381836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.02068185806274414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.0007164478302001953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 5.936622619628906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-homologene took 141.14102721214294s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::INOH took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.00026345252990722656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.6992514133453369s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.02044510841369629s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::INOH took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.0007102489471435547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::INOH took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::INOH took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-inoh took 4.21603798866272s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 39.02218055725098s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.0006642341613769531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.6931662559509277s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.020513057708740234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.0007171630859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 9.894371032714844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-interpro took 139.88472080230713s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 39.02230381965637s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.00033593177795410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.29479265213012695s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.020841598510742188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 2.002716064453125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.0007593631744384766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 7.939338684082031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-iproclass took 180.53347969055176s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 39.0209481716156s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.0005466938018798828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.6889431476593018s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.023405790328979492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 1.9073486328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 7.700920104980469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-irefindex took 141.5536379814148s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 5.1975250244140625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.00027751922607421875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.7080559730529785s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.020657062530517578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.0007026195526123047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 6.079673767089844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-kegg took 4.388824462890625s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 3.910064697265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.000213623046875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.29789066314697266s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.020760297775268555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 8.344650268554688e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.0007071495056152344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-kegg-biopax took 2.990766763687134s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 39.017470836639404s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.0006020069122314453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.274860143661499s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.020752429962158203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.0007228851318359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-linkedspl took 180.86142539978027s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 39.023176193237305s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.000629425048828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.3517179489135742s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.020529508590698242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.0007166862487792969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-lsr took 179.6653594970703s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 39.02497100830078s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.0004966259002685547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.27945399284362793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.020614147186279297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.0006997585296630859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 6.985664367675781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-mesh took 139.80070161819458s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 39.02350950241089s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.0002574920654296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.7020206451416016s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.020653963088989258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.0007169246673583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 9.036064147949219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-mgi took 180.82564640045166s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 39.02138805389404s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.0005061626434326172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.7083883285522461s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.020503759384155273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.0007100105285644531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.0001125335693359375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ncbigene took 180.9094967842102s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 39.022313594818115s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.0005319118499755859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.3952827453613281s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.020590543746948242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.0007350444793701172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ndc took 139.9528660774231s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.00028824806213378906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.25673866271972656s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.021621227264404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.0008187294006347656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 3.552436828613281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-netpath took 3.7574782371520996s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 39.00919818878174s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.0007228851318359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.24759483337402344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.020668745040893555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.0007236003875732422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-nextprot took 100.37610864639282s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 39.02332258224487s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.0006313323974609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.2778511047363281s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.02046942710876465s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Omim took 1.9073486328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.0007112026214599609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.0001220703125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Omim took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-omim took 140.12540006637573s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.0005764961242675781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.3176264762878418s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.02065587043762207s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.0007059574127197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 3.743171691894531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 24.754374742507935s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 39.024343729019165s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.000545501708984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.26580381393432617s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.020737648010253906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.0007064342498779297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 7.843971252441406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-orphanet took 180.19446468353271s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 39.02201843261719s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.0006544589996337891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.2523331642150879s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.02064061164855957s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.0006999969482421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 3.24249267578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pathwaycommons took 179.90967535972595s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 39.022342681884766s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.0005097389221191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.2939493656158447s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.02065277099609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.0007317066192626953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 6.914138793945312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pharmgkb took 141.61673045158386s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.0002715587615966797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.2547926902770996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.020554304122924805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pharmgkb-biopax took 4.199997901916504s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PID took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.0002741813659667969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.719127893447876s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.020321130752563477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PID took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.0007243156433105469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PID took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PID took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pid took 3.834550142288208s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.00026607513427734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.6905064582824707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.020467281341552734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 2.86102294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pubchem-2 took 3.386948347091675s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 39.02190136909485s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.0007665157318115234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.30788588523864746s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.020857572555541992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.0007495880126953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.000133514404296875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pubmed took 161.8638949394226s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.00026702880859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.2824077606201172s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.020541667938232422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.0007138252258300781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 6.67572021484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-reactome took 3.807244062423706s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.0002574920654296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.37335896492004395s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.02030777931213379s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.0007102489471435547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 5.14984130859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-rhea took 3.025738000869751s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 39.02102994918823s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.0006494522094726562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.25856804847717285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.020531892776489258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.0007388591766357422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 7.367134094238281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sabiork took 140.1393814086914s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 39.021159172058105s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.0005331039428710938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.28676390647888184s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.021059036254882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.00072479248046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.00011014938354492188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sgd took 140.2940595149994s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.0006742477416992188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.2610034942626953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.020842790603637695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.0007243156433105469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 3.361701965332031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 23.779372215270996s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 39.02612495422363s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.0005800724029541016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.7238852977752686s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.02072882652282715s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sider took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.0007035732269287109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sider took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sider took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sider took 179.55600953102112s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 3.886222839355469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.0007925033569335938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.27216672897338867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.020413637161254883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.0006923675537109375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-spike took 3.534695625305176s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-taxon took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.0007116794586181641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.25757646560668945s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.020476102828979492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-taxon took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.0007936954498291016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-taxon took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-taxon took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-taxon took 23.628897190093994s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 39.018335819244385s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.0005133152008056641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.6818380355834961s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.02081918716430664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.0007109642028808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 9.822845458984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-taxonomy took 140.38829469680786s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 39.02308797836304s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.0005295276641845703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.2621579170227051s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.02115035057067871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.0007007122039794922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 3.6716461181640625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-wikipathways took 179.5224211215973s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 39.02025771141052s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.0005517005920410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.8300175666809082s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.020394325256347656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 1.8835067749023438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.0007340908050537109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 7.700920104980469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-wormbase took 180.08685398101807s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biografías y Vidas took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biografías y Vidas took 0.00025153160095214844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biografías y Vidas took 0.2511563301086426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biografías y Vidas took 0.020294189453125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biografías y Vidas took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biografías y Vidas took 0.0007076263427734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biografías y Vidas took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biografías y Vidas took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biografiasyvidas took 3.22438907623291s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.23049616813659668s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.00022673606872558594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.2564873695373535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.020596027374267578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.0007479190826416016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 8.225440979003906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biographical-directory-of-the-united-states-congress took 2.6513030529022217s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.00022745132446289062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.2569904327392578s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.020151376724243164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.0007529258728027344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biolit took 2.9457333087921143s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.0007238388061523438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.25142598152160645s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.02079319953918457s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.0007128715515136719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biolod-pdb took 7.916865825653076s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioModels RDF took 0.7478389739990234s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioModels RDF took 0.00046944618225097656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioModels RDF took 0.27211666107177734s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioModels RDF took 0.0205075740814209s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioModels RDF took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioModels RDF took 0.0007460117340087891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioModels RDF took 3.695487976074219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioModels RDF took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biomodels-rdf took 3.838900089263916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 2.8809242248535156s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.0005979537963867188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.2711174488067627s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.020355701446533203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 2.2649765014648438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.0007097721099853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 2.7418136596679688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Biop took 7.268942832946777s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.0002448558807373047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.28860044479370117s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.020746469497680664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.0007107257843017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 3.6716461181640625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 3.218650817871094e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bioportal took 2.4445111751556396s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amphibian gross anatomy took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0005033016204833984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.296067476272583s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.020811796188354492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amphibian gross anatomy took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0007357597351074219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0006315708160400391s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amphibian gross anatomy took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aao took 2.672487497329712s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 5.7697296142578125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.0004703998565673828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.2642664909362793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.020549774169921875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.0006990432739257812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.00028896331787109375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aba took 2.6396665573120117s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.0004754066467285156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.26056838035583496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.02109813690185547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.001470804214477539s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-acgt took 2.647554874420166s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Animal natural history and life history took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Animal natural history and life history took 0.00047779083251953125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Animal natural history and life history took 0.2700614929199219s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Animal natural history and life history took 0.020704269409179688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Animal natural history and life history took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Animal natural history and life history took 0.0007486343383789062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Animal natural history and life history took 0.00032401084899902344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Animal natural history and life history took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-adw took 2.7176835536956787s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.0005078315734863281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.2788093090057373s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.020494699478149414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.0007021427154541016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.0004584789276123047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aeo took 2.636106014251709s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0010712146759033203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.2656106948852539s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0205233097076416s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0006978511810302734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0009558200836181641s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aero took 2.533787965774536s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AI/RHEUM took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AI/RHEUM took 0.00047206878662109375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AI/RHEUM took 0.2989187240600586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AI/RHEUM took 0.020807266235351562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AI/RHEUM took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AI/RHEUM took 0.0007126331329345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AI/RHEUM took 0.00039577484130859375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AI/RHEUM took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-air took 2.6644327640533447s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amino Acid took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amino Acid took 0.0004985332489013672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amino Acid took 0.2503623962402344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amino Acid took 0.020856618881225586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amino Acid took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amino Acid took 0.0007090568542480469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amino Acid took 0.00024437904357910156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amino Acid took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-amino-acid took 2.6446681022644043s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 7.009506225585938e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.00044608116149902344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.25778913497924805s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.020595073699951172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.0007543563842773438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.0002799034118652344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-apo took 2.5703577995300293s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for African Traditional Medicine took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for African Traditional Medicine took 0.0004787445068359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for African Traditional Medicine took 0.2896122932434082s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for African Traditional Medicine took 0.021094083786010742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for African Traditional Medicine took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for African Traditional Medicine took 0.0007021427154541016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for African Traditional Medicine took 0.0002377033233642578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for African Traditional Medicine took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-atmo took 2.633342742919922s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amphibian taxonomy took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.0004673004150390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.30339670181274414s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.02078557014465332s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amphibian taxonomy took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.0007479190826416016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amphibian taxonomy took 9.250640869140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amphibian taxonomy took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ato took 2.6331305503845215s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioAssay Ontology took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0005350112915039062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioAssay Ontology took 0.26549839973449707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioAssay Ontology took 0.020749330520629883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioAssay Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0007076263427734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0012912750244140625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioAssay Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bao took 2.610832929611206s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.00047206878662109375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.2584998607635498s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.020635128021240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.00070953369140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.0003724098205566406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-basic-vertebrate-gross-anatomy took 2.772312641143799s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.0004911422729492188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.28917431831359863s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.02044534683227539s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.0007288455963134766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.00032973289489746094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bcgo took 2.5963938236236572s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.00046753883361816406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.29770970344543457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.020564794540405273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.0006976127624511719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.0013866424560546875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bdo took 2.5832178592681885s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basic Formal Ontology took 7.867813110351562e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.00046372413635253906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.27068448066711426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.020567893981933594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basic Formal Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0007042884826660156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0005011558532714844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basic Formal Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bfo took 2.6749749183654785s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bleeding History Phenotype took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.0005321502685546875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.28893065452575684s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.020533084869384766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bleeding History Phenotype took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.0007035732269287109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.0007250308990478516s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bleeding History Phenotype took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bho took 2.6480906009674072s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bilateria anatomy took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bilateria anatomy took 0.0004584789276123047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bilateria anatomy took 0.2795114517211914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bilateria anatomy took 0.02100348472595215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bilateria anatomy took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bilateria anatomy took 0.0007205009460449219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bilateria anatomy took 0.0004227161407470703s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bilateria anatomy took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bila took 2.589324712753296s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BIRNLex took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BIRNLex took 0.0004553794860839844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BIRNLex took 0.26378846168518066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BIRNLex took 0.021201610565185547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BIRNLex took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BIRNLex took 0.0007085800170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BIRNLex took 0.0014650821685791016s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BIRNLex took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-birnlex took 2.587287425994873s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.000469207763671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.2550010681152344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.020913362503051758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Regulation Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007581710815429688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007538795471191406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Regulation Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bootstrep took 2.661107063293457s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioPAX took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioPAX took 0.00046825408935546875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioPAX took 0.28144216537475586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioPAX took 0.02068948745727539s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioPAX took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioPAX took 0.0007181167602539062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioPAX took 9.5367431640625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioPAX took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bp took 2.7526490688323975s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.00046539306640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.2733025550842285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.020476818084716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.0007135868072509766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.0003209114074707031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bro_x1 took 2.6404616832733154s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Spatial Ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Spatial Ontology took 0.00047969818115234375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Spatial Ontology took 0.2686648368835449s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Spatial Ontology took 0.020392656326293945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Spatial Ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Spatial Ontology took 0.0007040500640869141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Spatial Ontology took 0.00020313262939453125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Spatial Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bspo took 2.6799113750457764s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioTop took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioTop took 0.0004811286926269531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioTop took 0.2613072395324707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioTop took 0.02128458023071289s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioTop took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioTop took 0.0007295608520507812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioTop took 0.0006899833679199219s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioTop took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bt took 2.5820038318634033s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.0005233287811279297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.2565732002258301s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.020883798599243164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.0007011890411376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.0008602142333984375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bto took 2.556394338607788s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 7.43865966796875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0004875659942626953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.3236227035522461s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.02062845230102539s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0018315315246582031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-canco took 3.1051735877990723s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CAO took 0.00011086463928222656s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CAO took 0.0005464553833007812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CAO took 0.2556624412536621s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CAO took 0.02081584930419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CAO took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CAO took 0.0007135868072509766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CAO took 0.000591278076171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CAO took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cao took 2.686709403991699s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CareLex took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CareLex took 0.00029397010803222656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CareLex took 0.254378080368042s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CareLex took 0.020519256591796875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CareLex took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CareLex took 0.0007302761077880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CareLex took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CareLex took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-carelex took 2.6679539680480957s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell Cycle Ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.0004999637603759766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.2507808208465576s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.020715713500976562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell Cycle Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.0007054805755615234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.0008096694946289062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell Cycle Ontology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cco took 2.6207244396209717s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.0005466938018798828s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.0004863739013671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.2504608631134033s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.02098393440246582s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.0007276535034179688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.00024962425231933594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cdao took 2.578223466873169s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical entities of biological interest took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0004892349243164062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.2698476314544678s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.020719528198242188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical entities of biological interest took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0007150173187255859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0007951259613037109s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical entities of biological interest took 3.337860107421875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-chebi took 2.6705191135406494s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.0005810260772705078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.26561951637268066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.020664691925048828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.0007138252258300781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.00025773048400878906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-chem2bio2owl took 2.6604044437408447s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical Information Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.000514984130859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.2852132320404053s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.020764589309692383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical Information Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0006990432739257812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0007557868957519531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical Information Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cheminf took 2.6180381774902344s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell type took 7.557868957519531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell type took 0.0006117820739746094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell type took 0.2985963821411133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell type took 0.020846843719482422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell type took 1.71661376953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell type took 0.0007145404815673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell type took 0.0003819465637207031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell type took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cl took 2.7527830600738525s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell Line Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell Line Ontology took 0.00047087669372558594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell Line Ontology took 0.26241111755371094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell Line Ontology took 0.020479917526245117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell Line Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell Line Ontology took 0.0006978511810302734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell Line Ontology took 0.0008609294891357422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell Line Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-clo took 2.648585796356201s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.0005128383636474609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.2833731174468994s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.021001577377319336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.0007116794586181641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.00016689300537109375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cmo took 2.639115571975708s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 7.796287536621094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.00048732757568359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.2667367458343506s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.020908117294311523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.0007045269012451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.0002193450927734375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cno took 2.602823257446289s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Wheat trait took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Wheat trait took 0.0005109310150146484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Wheat trait took 0.2683393955230713s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Wheat trait took 0.02063584327697754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Wheat trait took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Wheat trait took 0.0007004737854003906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Wheat trait took 5.125999450683594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Wheat trait took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-co_wheat took 2.589973211288452s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cognitive Atlas took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cognitive Atlas took 0.0005335807800292969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cognitive Atlas took 0.26004505157470703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cognitive Atlas took 0.020890235900878906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cognitive Atlas took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cognitive Atlas took 0.0007078647613525391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cognitive Atlas took 0.0003600120544433594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cognitive Atlas took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cogat took 2.651721477508545s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.00045990943908691406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.25336503982543945s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.0208127498626709s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.00074005126953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.00072479248046875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cogpo took 2.655045509338379s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Current Procedural Terminology took 5.602836608886719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0005292892456054688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.2601735591888428s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.020769834518432617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Current Procedural Terminology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0007116794586181641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.00041294097900390625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Current Procedural Terminology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cpt took 2.62276554107666s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 7.081031799316406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.0005736351013183594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.28775978088378906s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.02068805694580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.0007083415985107422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.001706838607788086s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-csp took 3.0995547771453857s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for COSTART took 6.747245788574219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for COSTART took 0.0005290508270263672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for COSTART took 0.3007628917694092s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for COSTART took 0.02048802375793457s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for COSTART took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for COSTART took 0.000698089599609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for COSTART took 0.0010178089141845703s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for COSTART took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cst took 2.7481720447540283s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.0005655288696289062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.27038049697875977s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.020716428756713867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.0007033348083496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.0004916191101074219s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ctcae took 2.635793447494507s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0006532669067382812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.27603936195373535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.020885229110717773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0007131099700927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0004398822784423828s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ctx took 2.627044200897217s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dendritic cell took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dendritic cell took 0.00044727325439453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dendritic cell took 0.27425718307495117s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dendritic cell took 0.020815372467041016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dendritic cell took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dendritic cell took 0.0007092952728271484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dendritic cell took 0.00028324127197265625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dendritic cell took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-dc_cl took 2.612473249435425s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.0004763603210449219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.2622373104095459s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.020644187927246094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.0007035732269287109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 9.012222290039062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ddanat took 2.5867762565612793s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.0005056858062744141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.2833123207092285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.020684242248535156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.0007085800170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.0009319782257080078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ddi took 2.7198026180267334s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Diagnostic Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.00044727325439453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.2916903495788574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.020859241485595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Diagnostic Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.0007131099700927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Diagnostic Ontology took 8.130073547363281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Diagnostic Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-diagnosticont took 2.6912972927093506s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.0005471706390380859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.27127885818481445s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.02061176300048828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.0007028579711914062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.00016188621520996094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-dikb-evidence took 2.625406265258789s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human disease ontology took 4.839897155761719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human disease ontology took 0.0005431175231933594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human disease ontology took 0.25605034828186035s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human disease ontology took 0.020737171173095703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human disease ontology took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human disease ontology took 0.0006976127624511719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human disease ontology took 0.0006144046783447266s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human disease ontology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-doid took 2.560194253921509s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Electrocardiography Ontology took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.0005078315734863281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.2832813262939453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.02103400230407715s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Electrocardiography Ontology took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.0010085105895996094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.0009369850158691406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Electrocardiography Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ecg took 2.6487350463867188s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Evidence codes took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Evidence codes took 0.000484466552734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Evidence codes took 0.2990286350250244s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Evidence codes took 0.020487070083618164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Evidence codes took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Evidence codes took 0.0007123947143554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Evidence codes took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Evidence codes took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-eco took 2.7227771282196045s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Experimental Factor Ontology took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.0005846023559570312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.31080198287963867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.0206301212310791s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Experimental Factor Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.000705718994140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.001722097396850586s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Experimental Factor Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-efo took 3.0636508464813232s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0011110305786132812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.2607417106628418s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.020895957946777344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 1.71661376953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0007050037384033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0011811256408691406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehda took 2.5991642475128174s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 7.200241088867188e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.00047850608825683594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.27114391326904297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.020740747451782227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0006992816925048828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0007464885711669922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 3.814697265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehdaa took 2.6549551486968994s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0004696846008300781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.2471764087677002s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.02022552490234375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0006992816925048828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0005056858062744141s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehdaa2 took 2.6036338806152344s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.00044918060302734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.25696873664855957s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.02039337158203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.0007531642913818359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-emap took 2.5952205657958984s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Environment Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Environment Ontology took 0.0005176067352294922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Environment Ontology took 0.2620711326599121s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Environment Ontology took 0.022838354110717773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Environment Ontology took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Environment Ontology took 0.0007326602935791016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Environment Ontology took 0.0004949569702148438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Environment Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-envo took 2.6959433555603027s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant environmental conditions took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant environmental conditions took 0.0005300045013427734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant environmental conditions took 0.27062249183654785s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant environmental conditions took 0.02180957794189453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant environmental conditions took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant environmental conditions took 0.0007700920104980469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant environmental conditions took 0.0003209114074707031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant environmental conditions took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-eo took 2.657569408416748s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.0005195140838623047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.2636129856109619s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.020621776580810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.0007152557373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.0012030601501464844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ep took 2.58378267288208s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Epilepsy took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Epilepsy took 0.0006127357482910156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Epilepsy took 0.2678813934326172s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Epilepsy took 0.0210111141204834s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Epilepsy took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Epilepsy took 0.0009086132049560547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Epilepsy took 0.00016307830810546875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Epilepsy took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-epileponto took 2.5931639671325684s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for eagle-i research resource ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.00049591064453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.2468407154083252s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.02081131935119629s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for eagle-i research resource ontology took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.0007083415985107422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.001155853271484375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for eagle-i research resource ontology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ero took 2.546445846557617s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 7.62939453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0005772113800048828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.26006221771240234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.020366430282592773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0007030963897705078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0011248588562011719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ev took 2.5898935794830322s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ExO took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ExO took 0.0004985332489013672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ExO took 0.26695799827575684s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ExO took 0.020466089248657227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ExO took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ExO took 0.0007021427154541016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ExO took 0.00022721290588378906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ExO took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-exo took 2.7352828979492188s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fungal gross anatomy took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.0005004405975341797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.26548337936401367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.020222902297973633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fungal gross anatomy took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.0007543563842773438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.00010347366333007812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fungal gross anatomy took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fao took 2.6480724811553955s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biological imaging methods took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biological imaging methods took 0.0004665851593017578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biological imaging methods took 0.26265835762023926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biological imaging methods took 0.02017951011657715s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biological imaging methods took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biological imaging methods took 0.0007023811340332031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biological imaging methods took 0.00018644332885742188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biological imaging methods took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbbi took 2.634042263031006s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Drosophila gross anatomy took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.00043773651123046875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.2980954647064209s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.020660400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Drosophila gross anatomy took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.0006279945373535156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Drosophila gross anatomy took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbbt took 2.6148173809051514s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.0004725456237792969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.26283979415893555s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.020525693893432617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.0007293224334716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.0004162788391113281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbcv took 2.658332347869873s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Drosophila development took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Drosophila development took 0.000484466552734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Drosophila development took 0.2755613327026367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Drosophila development took 0.02063727378845215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Drosophila development took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Drosophila development took 0.0007228851318359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Drosophila development took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Drosophila development took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbdv took 2.603236436843872s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fly taxonomy took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fly taxonomy took 0.0005433559417724609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fly taxonomy took 0.27657175064086914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fly taxonomy took 0.021057605743408203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fly taxonomy took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fly taxonomy took 0.0008332729339599609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fly taxonomy took 0.0004124641418457031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fly taxonomy took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbsp took 2.6220295429229736s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0005047321319580078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.24406218528747559s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.020958900451660156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0007355213165283203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.00022125244140625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fda-meddevice took 2.667841672897339s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Family Health History Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Family Health History Ontology took 0.0004761219024658203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Family Health History Ontology took 0.2574498653411865s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Family Health History Ontology took 0.021164894104003906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Family Health History Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Family Health History Ontology took 0.0007359981536865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Family Health History Ontology took 0.00041365623474121094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Family Health History Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fhho took 2.6173927783966064s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Influenza Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Influenza Ontology took 0.00047516822814941406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Influenza Ontology took 0.28438448905944824s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Influenza Ontology took 0.02043318748474121s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Influenza Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Influenza Ontology took 0.0007171630859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Influenza Ontology took 0.0010311603546142578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Influenza Ontology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-flu took 2.649202823638916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.0005319118499755859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.2673206329345703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.020768404006958008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.0007066726684570312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 5.9604644775390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fma took 2.5842185020446777s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.0005104541778564453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.2760436534881592s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.02043294906616211s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.0007429122924804688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.00012493133544921875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fypo took 2.5627708435058594s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for GeoSpecies Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.0004630088806152344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.27925682067871094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.020750045776367188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for GeoSpecies Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.0007107257843017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for GeoSpecies Ontology took 8.916854858398438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for GeoSpecies Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-geospecies took 2.621608018875122s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for General Formal Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for General Formal Ontology took 0.0005266666412353516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for General Formal Ontology took 0.2603332996368408s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for General Formal Ontology took 0.020627260208129883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for General Formal Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for General Formal Ontology took 0.0007081031799316406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for General Formal Ontology took 0.000179290771484375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for General Formal Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gfo took 2.6233131885528564s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0005095005035400391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.2808244228363037s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.020470619201660156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0006983280181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0005810260772705078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gfo-bio took 2.573324203491211s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Ontology Extension took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0004534721374511719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.25101566314697266s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.020545482635498047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Ontology Extension took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0007145404815673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0009024143218994141s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Ontology Extension took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-go_x1 took 2.64841628074646s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Ontology took 0.00046253204345703125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Ontology took 0.2672557830810547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Ontology took 0.020671606063842773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Ontology took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Ontology took 0.0008325576782226562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-go_x2 took 2.701047658920288s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cereal Plant Development took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cereal Plant Development took 0.0004966259002685547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cereal Plant Development took 0.26050257682800293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cereal Plant Development took 0.020624399185180664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cereal Plant Development took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cereal Plant Development took 0.0006952285766601562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cereal Plant Development took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cereal Plant Development took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro took 2.729739189147949s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.0004687309265136719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.256847620010376s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.02057790756225586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.0006992816925048828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.00043129920959472656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro_x1 took 2.665816068649292s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0005533695220947266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.2915346622467041s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.020399093627929688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Regulation Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0006947517395019531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007312297821044922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Regulation Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro_x2 took 2.734816551208496s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.00048160552978515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.27640867233276367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.020377159118652344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0006990432739257812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0005552768707275391s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hao took 2.673949718475342s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HCPCS took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HCPCS took 0.0005495548248291016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HCPCS took 0.26079726219177246s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HCPCS took 0.020212411880493164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HCPCS took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HCPCS took 0.0007460117340087891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HCPCS took 0.00021314620971679688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HCPCS took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hcpcs took 2.6641037464141846s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Health Level Seven took 7.796287536621094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Health Level Seven took 0.0005049705505371094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Health Level Seven took 0.25405430793762207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Health Level Seven took 0.020526885986328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Health Level Seven took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Health Level Seven took 0.0007197856903076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Health Level Seven took 0.0013098716735839844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Health Level Seven took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hl7 took 2.640359878540039s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.0006415843963623047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.2518181800842285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.02023792266845703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.0007114410400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.0003407001495361328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hlth_indics took 2.645803689956665s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.0004711151123046875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.2626075744628906s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.02037668228149414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.0007481575012207031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hom took 2.6236751079559326s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HOM-HARVARD took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HOM-HARVARD took 0.00046515464782714844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HOM-HARVARD took 0.255695104598999s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HOM-HARVARD took 0.02031874656677246s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HOM-HARVARD took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HOM-HARVARD took 0.0007193088531494141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HOM-HARVARD took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HOM-HARVARD took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hom_harvard took 2.6144020557403564s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human Phenotype Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0005099773406982422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.30614542961120605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.02069401741027832s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human Phenotype Ontology took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0007150173187255859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0006437301635742188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human Phenotype Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hp_x1 took 2.710502862930298s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 7.891654968261719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.0005278587341308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.274212121963501s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.020566701889038086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.001035928726196289s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hpio took 2.6546761989593506s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HUGO took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HUGO took 0.00025773048400878906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HUGO took 0.2658195495605469s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HUGO took 0.020425081253051758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HUGO took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HUGO took 0.0007071495056152344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HUGO took 7.486343383789062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HUGO took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hugo took 2.5889363288879395s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Information Artifact Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.0005362033843994141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.26068973541259766s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.020471572875976562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Information Artifact Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.0007185935974121094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.0006477832794189453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Information Artifact Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-iao took 2.646272659301758s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD10 took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD10 took 0.0005462169647216797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD10 took 0.280536413192749s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD10 took 0.02094292640686035s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD10 took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD10 took 0.0007264614105224609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD10 took 0.0008318424224853516s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD10 took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10 took 2.632847309112549s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD10CM took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD10CM took 0.00036144256591796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD10CM took 0.2586684226989746s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD10CM took 0.02047419548034668s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD10CM took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD10CM took 0.0007479190826416016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD10CM took 0.0006277561187744141s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD10CM took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10cm took 2.6752235889434814s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD-10-PCS took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD-10-PCS took 0.0003972053527832031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD-10-PCS took 0.2583765983581543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD-10-PCS took 0.020765066146850586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD-10-PCS took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD-10-PCS took 0.0007271766662597656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD-10-PCS took 0.00015544891357421875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD-10-PCS took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10pcs took 2.545175313949585s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Diseases took 8.344650268554688e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0004894733428955078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Diseases took 0.28513288497924805s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Diseases took 0.020687580108642578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Diseases took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0007083415985107422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0006439685821533203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Diseases took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd9cm took 2.66984224319458s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0006034374237060547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.27573657035827637s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.02075934410095215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0007100105285644531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0004336833953857422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icf_x1 took 2.70335054397583s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0004906654357910156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.2777426242828369s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.020650625228881836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0007259845733642578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0012404918670654297s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icnp took 2.67749285697937s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Primary Care took 5.650520324707031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.0004787445068359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.2614576816558838s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.02102828025817871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Primary Care took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.00043964385986328125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Primary Care took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icpc took 2.5502519607543945s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICPC-2 PLUS took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0006551742553710938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.2816038131713867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.02076435089111328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICPC-2 PLUS took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0007064342498779297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0009362697601318359s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICPC-2 PLUS took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icpc2p took 2.6370620727539062s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICPS Network took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICPS Network took 0.0005953311920166016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICPS Network took 0.3032100200653076s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICPS Network took 0.02060866355895996s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICPS Network took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICPS Network took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICPS Network took 0.0002295970916748047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICPS Network took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icps took 2.6540005207061768s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Infectious Disease Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0005421638488769531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.27304911613464355s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.02074456214904785s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Infectious Disease Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0007970333099365234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0009522438049316406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Infectious Disease Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ido took 2.6059796810150146s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brucellosis Ontology took 8.845329284667969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0005860328674316406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.24860906600952148s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.02100968360900879s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brucellosis Ontology took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0007510185241699219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0011637210845947266s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brucellosis Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-idobru took 2.627389430999756s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Malaria Ontology took 6.103515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Malaria Ontology took 0.0004982948303222656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Malaria Ontology took 0.257770299911499s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Malaria Ontology took 0.020316600799560547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Malaria Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Malaria Ontology took 0.0007474422454833984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Malaria Ontology took 0.001314401626586914s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Malaria Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-idomal took 2.628316879272461s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.0005197525024414062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.2610740661621094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.020600080490112305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.0007183551788330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.00031065940856933594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-iev took 2.6383910179138184s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.0005140304565429688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.2668027877807617s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.020277023315429688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.0009508132934570312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.000179290771484375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-imgt took 2.647071123123169s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0004885196685791016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.26702189445495605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.020326852798461914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.000698089599609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0005207061767578125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-imr took 2.6304209232330322s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Interaction Network Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0005691051483154297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.25741124153137207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.020131826400756836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Interaction Network Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0007805824279785156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Interaction Network Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ino took 2.6267333030700684s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Hewan Invertebrata took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.0005288124084472656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.2594935894012451s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.02041769027709961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Hewan Invertebrata took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.0007345676422119141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Hewan Invertebrata took 2.6941299438476562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Hewan Invertebrata took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-invertebrata took 2.68631911277771s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for IxnO took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for IxnO took 0.00047278404235839844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for IxnO took 0.28513336181640625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for IxnO took 0.020287036895751953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for IxnO took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for IxnO took 0.0007390975952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for IxnO took 0.00018644332885742188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for IxnO took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ixno took 2.668595314025879s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SysMO-JERM took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SysMO-JERM took 0.0005512237548828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SysMO-JERM took 0.2573428153991699s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SysMO-JERM took 0.02045273780822754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SysMO-JERM took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SysMO-JERM took 0.0007212162017822266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SysMO-JERM took 0.00038552284240722656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SysMO-JERM took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-jerm took 2.576115369796753s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.0004820823669433594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.26016855239868164s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.020887136459350586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.0009503364562988281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 3.504753112792969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-kisao took 2.600235939025879s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Loggerhead nesting took 5.8650970458984375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Loggerhead nesting took 0.0005209445953369141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Loggerhead nesting took 0.298569917678833s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Loggerhead nesting took 0.02046060562133789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Loggerhead nesting took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Loggerhead nesting took 0.0007166862487792969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Loggerhead nesting took 0.00019598007202148438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Loggerhead nesting took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lhn took 2.7075822353363037s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Lipid Ontology took 4.696846008300781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Lipid Ontology took 0.0004818439483642578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Lipid Ontology took 0.2838268280029297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Lipid Ontology took 0.020362138748168945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Lipid Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Lipid Ontology took 0.0007281303405761719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Lipid Ontology took 0.0001919269561767578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Lipid Ontology took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lipro took 2.6790273189544678s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 6.0558319091796875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0005621910095214844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.31472325325012207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.020598173141479492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0007326602935791016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0018544197082519531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lnc took 3.2222542762756348s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.0004994869232177734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.2773170471191406s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.020428895950317383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.0008523464202880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.0006921291351318359s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ma took 2.664928913116455s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Multiple alignment took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Multiple alignment took 0.000537872314453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Multiple alignment took 0.27860379219055176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Multiple alignment took 0.020384550094604492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Multiple alignment took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Multiple alignment took 0.0007429122924804688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Multiple alignment took 0.0001971721649169922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Multiple alignment took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mao took 2.7006542682647705s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Minimal anatomical terminology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0005443096160888672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.2511863708496094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.02041792869567871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Minimal anatomical terminology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0007183551788330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0007224082946777344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Minimal anatomical terminology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mat took 2.648411750793457s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Breast tissue cell lines took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.0005238056182861328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.27773475646972656s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.02042865753173828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Breast tissue cell lines took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.0007071495056152344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.0004096031188964844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Breast tissue cell lines took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mcbcc took 2.6507019996643066s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell line ontology took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell line ontology took 0.0005736351013183594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell line ontology took 0.26125144958496094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell line ontology took 0.02030038833618164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell line ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell line ontology took 0.0007359981536865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell line ontology took 0.0007505416870117188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell line ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mccl took 2.74497652053833s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell line ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell line ontology took 0.0005693435668945312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell line ontology took 0.2865326404571533s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell line ontology took 0.020912885665893555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell line ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell line ontology took 0.0007140636444091797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell line ontology took 0.0014448165893554688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell line ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mccl_x1 took 2.656625509262085s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.0005431175231933594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.29610466957092285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.020575284957885742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.0007596015930175781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.00023436546325683594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mcv took 2.7108566761016846s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Master Drug Data Base took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Master Drug Data Base took 0.0005397796630859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Master Drug Data Base took 0.28623437881469727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Master Drug Data Base took 0.020244359970092773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Master Drug Data Base took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Master Drug Data Base took 0.0007114410400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Master Drug Data Base took 0.00018215179443359375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Master Drug Data Base took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mddb took 2.652653694152832s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MedDRA took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MedDRA took 0.0005419254302978516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MedDRA took 0.25474071502685547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MedDRA took 0.021081924438476562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MedDRA took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MedDRA took 0.0008232593536376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MedDRA took 0.0012159347534179688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MedDRA took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mdr took 2.692089557647705s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0004754066467285156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.2635304927825928s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.02039933204650879s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0007593631744384766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0009222030639648438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-medlineplus took 2.6894707679748535s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MeGO took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MeGO took 0.0005667209625244141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MeGO took 0.25349950790405273s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MeGO took 0.020316362380981445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MeGO took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MeGO took 0.0007300376892089844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MeGO took 0.00014138221740722656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MeGO took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mego took 2.609790802001953s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 5.841255187988281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0005652904510498047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.32660937309265137s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.020211219787597656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0007064342498779297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0018413066864013672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mesh-owl took 3.1138381958007812s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mental Functioning Ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.0005898475646972656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.28397035598754883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.020350217819213867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mental Functioning Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.0007147789001464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.0006077289581298828s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mental Functioning Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mf took 2.6655237674713135s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0005033016204833984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.2671339511871338s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.020427227020263672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0007038116455078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0005381107330322266s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mfo took 2.632260799407959s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Emotion Ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Emotion Ontology took 0.0004966259002685547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Emotion Ontology took 0.26853060722351074s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Emotion Ontology took 0.02039504051208496s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Emotion Ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Emotion Ontology took 0.000720977783203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Emotion Ontology took 0.0007870197296142578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Emotion Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mfoem took 2.574282646179199s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.0005381107330322266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.26626086235046387s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.020473241806030273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.0007026195526123047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 9.822845458984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mhc took 2.682488203048706s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Protein-protein interaction took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0005443096160888672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Protein-protein interaction took 0.2596399784088135s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0207064151763916s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Protein-protein interaction took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0007507801055908203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0006692409515380859s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Protein-protein interaction took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mi took 2.6436984539031982s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0004825592041015625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.2622339725494385s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.02065277099609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0007236003875732422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0007376670837402344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-miro took 2.66011381149292s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Measurement Method Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.0007407665252685547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.26743459701538086s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.02052474021911621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Measurement Method Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.0007143020629882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.00013399124145507812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Measurement Method Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mmo took 2.66524600982666s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MGED Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MGED Ontology took 0.00047206878662109375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MGED Ontology took 0.2661111354827881s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MGED Ontology took 0.02034163475036621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MGED Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MGED Ontology took 0.0007128715515136719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MGED Ontology took 0.00036907196044921875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MGED Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mo took 2.6255624294281006s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Protein modification took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Protein modification took 0.0005061626434326172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Protein modification took 0.27285337448120117s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Protein modification took 0.020609140396118164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Protein modification took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Protein modification took 0.0007383823394775391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Protein modification took 0.00022673606872558594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Protein modification took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mod took 2.6587953567504883s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mammalian phenotype took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0004949569702148438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mammalian phenotype took 0.2745363712310791s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mammalian phenotype took 0.02025771141052246s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mammalian phenotype took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0007367134094238281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0006525516510009766s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mammalian phenotype took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mp took 2.6239495277404785s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse pathology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse pathology took 0.0005209445953369141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse pathology took 0.2847142219543457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse pathology took 0.02035212516784668s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse pathology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse pathology took 0.0007228851318359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse pathology took 0.0004763603210449219s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse pathology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mpath took 2.710784912109375s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mass spectrometry took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mass spectrometry took 0.0004875659942626953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mass spectrometry took 0.2610621452331543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mass spectrometry took 0.02022838592529297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mass spectrometry took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mass spectrometry took 0.0007152557373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mass spectrometry took 0.0003447532653808594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mass spectrometry took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ms took 2.6219844818115234s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Medical Subject Headings took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0005393028259277344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Medical Subject Headings took 0.32173633575439453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Medical Subject Headings took 0.020401954650878906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Medical Subject Headings took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0007238388061523438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0018634796142578125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Medical Subject Headings took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-msh took 3.0937607288360596s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.0005242824554443359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.2853848934173584s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.020290613174438477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.0007107257843017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.0001678466796875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mthch took 2.676527261734009s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Natural Products Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0004918575286865234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Natural Products Ontology took 0.27684879302978516s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Natural Products Ontology took 0.021056175231933594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Natural Products Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0006988048553466797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0008170604705810547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Natural Products Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-natpro took 2.6869747638702393s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NCBI organismal classification took 5.626678466796875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NCBI organismal classification took 0.00025272369384765625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NCBI organismal classification took 0.27555203437805176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NCBI organismal classification took 0.020131587982177734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NCBI organismal classification took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NCBI organismal classification took 0.0007135868072509766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NCBI organismal classification took 0.0007958412170410156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NCBI organismal classification took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ncbitaxon took 2.579331874847412s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NCI Thesaurus took 7.343292236328125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NCI Thesaurus took 0.0004773139953613281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NCI Thesaurus took 0.3387718200683594s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NCI Thesaurus took 0.020570755004882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NCI Thesaurus took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NCI Thesaurus took 0.0007779598236083984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NCI Thesaurus took 0.001974821090698242s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NCI Thesaurus took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ncit took 3.0652244091033936s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for National Drug Data File took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for National Drug Data File took 0.0005452632904052734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for National Drug Data File took 0.2461411952972412s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for National Drug Data File took 0.02057480812072754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for National Drug Data File took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for National Drug Data File took 0.0007061958312988281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for National Drug Data File took 0.0006306171417236328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for National Drug Data File took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nddf took 2.5784289836883545s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for National Drug File took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for National Drug File took 0.0005452632904052734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for National Drug File took 0.2561969757080078s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for National Drug File took 0.020416975021362305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for National Drug File took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for National Drug File took 0.0007178783416748047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for National Drug File took 0.0012526512145996094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for National Drug File took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ndfrt took 2.6030540466308594s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.0005037784576416016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.25078368186950684s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.020199060440063477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.0007402896881103516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.0011403560638427734s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nemo_x1 took 2.668574571609497s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0004565715789794922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.2674446105957031s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.020345449447631836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0007121562957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0006744861602783203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-neomark took 2.6379127502441406s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.0004856586456298828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.2734260559082031s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.02020740509033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.0007345676422119141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.000118255615234375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-neomarkontology took 2.7075698375701904s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIFSTD took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIFSTD took 0.0004849433898925781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIFSTD took 0.3110203742980957s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIFSTD took 0.02019786834716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIFSTD took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIFSTD took 0.0007076263427734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIFSTD took 0.0020003318786621094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIFSTD took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif took 2.983025312423706s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIF Cell took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIF Cell took 0.00035858154296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIF Cell took 0.29741573333740234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIF Cell took 0.02037811279296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIF Cell took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIF Cell took 0.0007166862487792969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIF Cell took 0.0013470649719238281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIF Cell took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif_cell took 2.692641496658325s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIF Dysfunction took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIF Dysfunction took 0.0004570484161376953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIF Dysfunction took 0.25395750999450684s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIF Dysfunction took 0.02044510841369629s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIF Dysfunction took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIF Dysfunction took 0.0007035732269287109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIF Dysfunction took 0.0014007091522216797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIF Dysfunction took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif_dysfunction took 2.614184617996216s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0004792213439941406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.26360225677490234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.020273685455322266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0007090568542480469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0005593299865722656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nigo took 2.7616796493530273s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.00046062469482421875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.2760601043701172s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.02039647102355957s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0006978511810302734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0005319118499755859s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nmr took 2.6861798763275146s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.0005793571472167969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.2720372676849365s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.020514726638793945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.0007100105285644531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.0001125335693359375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nonrctontology took 2.702716588973999s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NanoParticle Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.0004642009735107422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.2766706943511963s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.020319461822509766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NanoParticle Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.00074005126953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.0012722015380859375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NanoParticle Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-npo took 2.655491590499878s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0004830360412597656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.24671411514282227s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.020366191864013672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0007331371307373047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.00077056884765625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oae took 2.594270944595337s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0004642009735107422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.2660245895385742s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.02017831802368164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0007145404815673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.001543283462524414s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-obi took 2.606175422668457s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for OBOE took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for OBOE took 0.0005214214324951172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for OBOE took 0.2621626853942871s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for OBOE took 0.020367145538330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for OBOE took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for OBOE took 0.0006966590881347656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for OBOE took 0.00010538101196289062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for OBOE took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oboe took 2.6676697731018066s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for OBOE SBC took 4.839897155761719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for OBOE SBC took 0.00048279762268066406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for OBOE SBC took 0.2750680446624756s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for OBOE SBC took 0.02016735076904297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for OBOE SBC took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for OBOE SBC took 0.0007066726684570312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for OBOE SBC took 0.0007903575897216797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for OBOE SBC took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oboe-sbc took 2.664072275161743s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 7.2479248046875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0004932880401611328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.2799112796783447s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.020676136016845703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0007576942443847656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0005900859832763672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ocre took 2.62615966796875s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0005309581756591797s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.00047206878662109375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.2654428482055664s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.020923614501953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0007178783416748047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.000885009765625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-odgi took 2.603816270828247s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 5.221366882324219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0005259513854980469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.27031373977661133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.020165205001831055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0006995201110839844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0008819103240966797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogi took 2.567915439605713s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.00047659873962402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.26078367233276367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.02010822296142578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.0007178783416748047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.0002853870391845703s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogmd took 2.5624570846557617s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for General Medical Science took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0004718303680419922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.2675015926361084s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.02056741714477539s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for General Medical Science took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0007145404815673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0006709098815917969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for General Medical Science took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogms took 2.6030993461608887s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0006287097930908203s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.000637054443359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.2535073757171631s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.02129530906677246s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0007634162902832031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0012602806091308594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omim took 2.6467607021331787s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.0005593299865722656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.27443718910217285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.02069091796875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.00077056884765625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.0004360675811767578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omit took 2.611997604370117s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 5.054473876953125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.00025391578674316406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.27332401275634766s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.021033287048339844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.0009799003601074219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.0006849765777587891s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omrse took 2.4707090854644775s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Data Mining took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.00049591064453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.2787055969238281s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.020419836044311523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Data Mining took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.0006949901580810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.000762939453125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Data Mining took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontodm took 2.6364572048187256s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.0006213188171386719s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.0005335807800292969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.2635014057159424s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.020293235778808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.0007154941558837891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.00023818016052246094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontodt took 2.649958372116089s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0003113746643066406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.2575225830078125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.020447731018066406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0007586479187011719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0006077289581298828s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontoorpha took 2.670260429382324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0005309581756591797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.2802917957305908s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.020464420318603516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0007138252258300781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0009107589721679688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-opl took 2.654656171798706s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Phenotypic quality took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Phenotypic quality took 0.0005433559417724609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Phenotypic quality took 0.24591612815856934s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Phenotypic quality took 0.020589351654052734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Phenotypic quality took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Phenotypic quality took 0.000705718994140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Phenotypic quality took 0.0008795261383056641s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Phenotypic quality took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pato took 2.5937936305999756s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physician Data Query took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physician Data Query took 0.0004813671112060547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physician Data Query took 0.26247572898864746s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physician Data Query took 0.020312786102294922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physician Data Query took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physician Data Query took 0.0007107257843017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physician Data Query took 0.0008447170257568359s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physician Data Query took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pdq took 2.6632988452911377s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Pediatric Terminology took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0005414485931396484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Pediatric Terminology took 0.25615549087524414s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Pediatric Terminology took 0.020494699478149414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Pediatric Terminology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0007228851318359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0007953643798828125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Pediatric Terminology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pedterm took 2.5855472087860107s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.0004508495330810547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.2819802761077881s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.02044677734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.000701904296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.00018405914306640625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-peo took 2.6087498664855957s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PHARE took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PHARE took 0.0004730224609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PHARE took 0.26427268981933594s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PHARE took 0.020592451095581055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PHARE took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PHARE took 0.0007016658782958984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PHARE took 0.0006153583526611328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PHARE took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-phare took 2.616752862930298s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PKO_Re took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PKO_Re took 0.0005795955657958984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PKO_Re took 0.27753353118896484s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PKO_Re took 0.021028757095336914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PKO_Re took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PKO_Re took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PKO_Re took 0.00017213821411132812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PKO_Re took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pko took 2.648327112197876s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PMA 2010 took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PMA 2010 took 0.0005228519439697266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PMA 2010 took 0.2747476100921631s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PMA 2010 took 0.020604848861694336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PMA 2010 took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PMA 2010 took 0.0007500648498535156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PMA 2010 took 0.0009098052978515625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PMA 2010 took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pma took 2.5884320735931396s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.0005209445953369141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.26010990142822266s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.02059459686279297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.0007197856903076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.00016760826110839844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pmr took 2.6225218772888184s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Anatomy took 8.153915405273438e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Anatomy took 0.00048422813415527344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Anatomy took 0.25686001777648926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Anatomy took 0.020290851593017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Anatomy took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Anatomy took 0.0007085800170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Anatomy took 0.0003833770751953125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Anatomy took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po took 2.6726996898651123s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.0004780292510986328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.28722357749938965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.020723581314086914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.000690460205078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 7.581710815429688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po_x1 took 2.651366710662842s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Ontology took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Ontology took 0.0005521774291992188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Ontology took 0.25011515617370605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Ontology took 0.020153522491455078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Ontology took 0.0006897449493408203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Ontology took 0.00042176246643066406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po_x2 took 2.5851969718933105s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0004515647888183594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.2635340690612793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.020190715789794922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0006959438323974609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0006666183471679688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pr took 2.576691150665283s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Proteomics data and process provenance took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.0005335807800292969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.2608006000518799s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.02023768424987793s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Proteomics data and process provenance took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.0007064342498779297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.00028443336486816406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Proteomics data and process provenance took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-propreo took 2.660813570022583s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Pathway ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Pathway ontology took 0.00045871734619140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Pathway ontology took 0.2868826389312744s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Pathway ontology took 0.020392894744873047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Pathway ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Pathway ontology took 0.0006973743438720703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Pathway ontology took 0.0001163482666015625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Pathway ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pw took 2.764417886734009s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.0004699230194091797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.29075050354003906s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.02050161361694336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.0008826255798339844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-qibo took 2.685939073562622s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.0004639625549316406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.35018181800842285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.020270586013793945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.0007064342498779297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.00189971923828125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rcd took 3.129403591156006s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.00045680999755859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.2742650508880615s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.020445585250854492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.0009331703186035156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.00015115737915039062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rctontology took 2.594236373901367s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.0004901885986328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.2825510501861572s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.020340442657470703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.0007059574127197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 9.083747863769531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-repo took 2.629660129547119s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physico-chemical process took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physico-chemical process took 0.0004723072052001953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physico-chemical process took 0.26435422897338867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physico-chemical process took 0.02043890953063965s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physico-chemical process took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physico-chemical process took 0.0007102489471435547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physico-chemical process took 0.00020503997802734375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physico-chemical process took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rex took 2.695781707763672s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RadLex took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RadLex took 0.0005574226379394531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RadLex took 0.2454395294189453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RadLex took 0.02078080177307129s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RadLex took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RadLex took 0.0007631778717041016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RadLex took 0.0015361309051513672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RadLex took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rid took 2.651484966278076s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RNA ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RNA ontology took 0.0004799365997314453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RNA ontology took 0.2771918773651123s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RNA ontology took 0.020630359649658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RNA ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RNA ontology took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RNA ontology took 0.0005557537078857422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RNA ontology took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rnao took 2.640995502471924s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Role Ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Role Ontology took 0.0005133152008056641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Role Ontology took 0.2605149745941162s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Role Ontology took 0.020373821258544922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Role Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Role Ontology took 0.0007197856903076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Role Ontology took 0.00018405914306640625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Role Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-roleo took 2.63004469871521s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Rat Strain Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.0005674362182617188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.2544581890106201s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.02049708366394043s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Rat Strain Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.0006954669952392578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.0001735687255859375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Rat Strain Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rs took 2.659914970397949s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RxNORM took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RxNORM took 0.0005013942718505859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RxNORM took 0.27860140800476074s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RxNORM took 0.020415067672729492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RxNORM took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RxNORM took 0.0007033348083496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RxNORM took 0.0006248950958251953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RxNORM took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rxnorm took 2.561276435852051s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0004684925079345703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.28416872024536133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.02056598663330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0007386207580566406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0010466575622558594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sao took 2.6278188228607178s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Systems Biology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Systems Biology took 0.0004971027374267578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Systems Biology took 0.2534816265106201s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Systems Biology took 0.02023601531982422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Systems Biology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Systems Biology took 0.0007116794586181641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Systems Biology took 0.0004458427429199219s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Systems Biology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sbo took 2.57116436958313s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.0004570484161376953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.283236026763916s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.020612716674804688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.0007195472717285156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.000102996826171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sbro took 2.720252513885498s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sleep Domain Ontology took 5.53131103515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.0004889965057373047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.27441859245300293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.02119731903076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sleep Domain Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.0007355213165283203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.0013477802276611328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sleep Domain Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sdo took 2.5760109424591064s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sample processing and separation techniques took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.000591278076171875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.25246691703796387s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.020498037338256836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sample processing and separation techniques took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.000701904296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.00033664703369140625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sample processing and separation techniques took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sep took 2.6089670658111572s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Student Health Record took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Student Health Record took 0.0005438327789306641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Student Health Record took 0.26540684700012207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Student Health Record took 0.02036738395690918s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Student Health Record took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Student Health Record took 0.0007090568542480469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Student Health Record took 0.000438690185546875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Student Health Record took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-shr took 2.552537441253662s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0005910396575927734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.274066686630249s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.020690202713012695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0007159709930419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0012128353118896484s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sio took 3.469527244567871s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Situation-Based Access Control took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.00025081634521484375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.2631549835205078s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.020500898361206055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Situation-Based Access Control took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.0007205009460449219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.00019550323486328125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Situation-Based Access Control took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sitbac took 2.585249423980713s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.0006031990051269531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.35207653045654297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.020598411560058594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.0007281303405761719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.0019185543060302734s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-snomedct took 3.075251817703247s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SNP-Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SNP-Ontology took 0.0006930828094482422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SNP-Ontology took 0.25902223587036133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SNP-Ontology took 0.02052617073059082s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SNP-Ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SNP-Ontology took 0.000701904296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SNP-Ontology took 0.0006592273712158203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SNP-Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-snpo took 2.5869805812835693s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sequence types and features took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sequence types and features took 0.0005159378051757812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sequence types and features took 0.26248788833618164s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sequence types and features took 0.02019977569580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sequence types and features took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sequence types and features took 0.00070953369140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sequence types and features took 0.00057220458984375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sequence types and features took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-so_x1 took 2.6421780586242676s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0004723072052001953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.30072903633117676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.02062368392944336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0007245540618896484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0018591880798339844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sopharm took 3.1115036010742188s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SoyOntology took 6.985664367675781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SoyOntology took 0.000507354736328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SoyOntology took 0.28791189193725586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SoyOntology took 0.020346403121948242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SoyOntology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SoyOntology took 0.0007297992706298828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SoyOntology took 0.00012421607971191406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SoyOntology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-soy took 2.6135685443878174s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Spider Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Spider Ontology took 0.0004763603210449219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Spider Ontology took 0.2760589122772217s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Spider Ontology took 0.02054286003112793s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Spider Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Spider Ontology took 0.0007028579711914062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Spider Ontology took 0.00033736228942871094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Spider Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-spd took 2.606595277786255s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 8.606910705566406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.000514984130859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.2703859806060791s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.020328521728515625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.0007262229919433594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.000263214111328125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-spto took 2.5786943435668945s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.00046634674072265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.27723050117492676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.020403385162353516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.0007297992706298828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.00044727325439453125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sso took 2.6834053993225098s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Software Ontology took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Software Ontology took 0.0004818439483642578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Software Ontology took 0.2697713375091553s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Software Ontology took 0.020430564880371094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Software Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Software Ontology took 0.0008072853088378906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Software Ontology took 0.0004334449768066406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Software Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-swo took 2.7401068210601807s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Tick gross anatomy took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Tick gross anatomy took 0.0004911422729492188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Tick gross anatomy took 0.26180100440979004s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Tick gross anatomy took 0.020987510681152344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Tick gross anatomy took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Tick gross anatomy took 0.0007009506225585938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Tick gross anatomy took 0.00023603439331054688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Tick gross anatomy took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tads took 2.6059770584106445s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.0005145072937011719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.28042125701904297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.020427942276000977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.0009222030639648438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tao took 2.674943208694458s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.0004818439483642578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.2751901149749756s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.020882844924926758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.0007212162017822266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 8.797645568847656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-taxrank took 2.678454875946045s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.0005097389221191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.25015997886657715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.02013111114501953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.0007424354553222656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 6.699562072753906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-teddy took 2.6066906452178955s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Time Event Ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Time Event Ontology took 0.0005731582641601562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Time Event Ontology took 0.27559900283813477s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Time Event Ontology took 0.0201416015625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Time Event Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Time Event Ontology took 0.0007231235504150391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Time Event Ontology took 0.0008137226104736328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Time Event Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-teo took 2.5997023582458496s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mosquito gross anatomy took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0004999637603759766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.2661116123199463s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.02035665512084961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mosquito gross anatomy took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0007131099700927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.00037598609924316406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mosquito gross anatomy took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tgma took 2.6347949504852295s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for thesaurus took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for thesaurus took 0.0005049705505371094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for thesaurus took 0.2538280487060547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for thesaurus took 0.020415782928466797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for thesaurus took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for thesaurus took 0.0007386207580566406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for thesaurus took 8.821487426757812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for thesaurus took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-thesaurus took 2.5536227226257324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.000492095947265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.2550830841064453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.02016139030456543s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.0003421306610107422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tm-signs-and-sympts took 2.655055522918701s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Translational Medicine Ontology took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0004634857177734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.2850034236907959s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.020449161529541016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Translational Medicine Ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0006985664367675781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0008063316345214844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Translational Medicine Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tmo took 2.666560649871826s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Trait Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.0004649162292480469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.2535066604614258s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.020394325256347656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Trait Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.0007193088531494141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.0001494884490966797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Trait Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-to took 2.5925493240356445s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for TOK_Ontology took 0.00047016143798828125s
Availability | VoID file availability check for TOK_Ontology took 0.00046253204345703125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for TOK_Ontology took 0.2816634178161621s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for TOK_Ontology took 0.02060985565185547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for TOK_Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for TOK_Ontology took 0.0007395744323730469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for TOK_Ontology took 0.00018858909606933594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for TOK_Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tok took 2.6314902305603027s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Teleost taxonomy took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Teleost taxonomy took 0.0005390644073486328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Teleost taxonomy took 0.301389217376709s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Teleost taxonomy took 0.02034282684326172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Teleost taxonomy took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Teleost taxonomy took 0.0007786750793457031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Teleost taxonomy took 0.00019359588623046875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Teleost taxonomy took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tto took 2.6764073371887207s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Uber anatomy ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.0005052089691162109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.2616453170776367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.020443439483642578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Uber anatomy ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.0007076263427734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.0010426044464111328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Uber anatomy ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-uberon took 2.6136183738708496s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Units Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Units Ontology took 0.0005044937133789062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Units Ontology took 0.27436161041259766s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Units Ontology took 0.020297527313232422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Units Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Units Ontology took 0.0007152557373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Units Ontology took 0.00021791458129882812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Units Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-unitsontology took 2.650012254714966s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Units of measurement took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Units of measurement took 0.0005180835723876953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Units of measurement took 0.2709176540374756s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Units of measurement took 0.020349740982055664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Units of measurement took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Units of measurement took 0.0007369518280029297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Units of measurement took 0.00027751922607421875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Units of measurement took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-uo took 2.65338397026062s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for VANDF took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for VANDF took 0.00046181678771972656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for VANDF took 0.2701432704925537s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for VANDF took 0.020602941513061523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for VANDF took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for VANDF took 0.0007147789001464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for VANDF took 0.000701904296875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for VANDF took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vandf took 2.6576297283172607s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.0005691051483154297s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.00047850608825683594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.30335330963134766s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.020504474639892578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.0007297992706298828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.0004181861877441406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vao took 2.7646291255950928s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0005469322204589844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.2655913829803467s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.020190954208374023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0007061958312988281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0006389617919921875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vhog took 2.698887825012207s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for VIVO took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for VIVO took 0.00047326087951660156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for VIVO took 0.2657487392425537s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for VIVO took 0.020296812057495117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for VIVO took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for VIVO took 0.0007359981536865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for VIVO took 0.000354766845703125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for VIVO took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vivo took 2.6200320720672607s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vaccine Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0004801750183105469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vaccine Ontology took 0.27234768867492676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vaccine Ontology took 0.020661592483520508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vaccine Ontology took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vaccine Ontology took 0.000736236572265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0012784004211425781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vaccine Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vo took 2.7153916358947754s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.0005507469177246094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.3079564571380615s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.020595788955688477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.0007066726684570312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.00020051002502441406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vt took 2.6690738201141357s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans gross anatomy took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0005290508270263672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.27527546882629395s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.020331382751464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans gross anatomy took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0007092952728271484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0004954338073730469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans gross anatomy took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbbt took 2.6292171478271484s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans development took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans development took 0.00046706199645996094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans development took 0.28462839126586914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans development took 0.020449399948120117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans development took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans development took 0.0007605552673339844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans development took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans development took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbls took 2.636021375656128s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans phenotype took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans phenotype took 0.0005245208740234375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans phenotype took 0.2603309154510498s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans phenotype took 0.020497798919677734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans phenotype took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans phenotype took 0.0007486343383789062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans phenotype took 8.940696716308594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans phenotype took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbphenotype took 2.6685683727264404s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0005800724029541016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.2620389461517334s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.020674943923950195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0005905628204345703s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-who took 2.569369316101074s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Xenopus anatomy and development took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0005471706390380859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.2846083641052246s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.02046489715576172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Xenopus anatomy and development took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0007023811340332031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0006759166717529297s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Xenopus anatomy and development took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-xao took 2.6914846897125244s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.0004968643188476562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.2729060649871826s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.020791053771972656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.0008077621459960938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.00024175643920898438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-xco took 2.647700309753418s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Yeast phenotypes took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Yeast phenotypes took 0.0005512237548828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Yeast phenotypes took 0.255143404006958s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Yeast phenotypes took 0.02055978775024414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Yeast phenotypes took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Yeast phenotypes took 0.0007102489471435547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Yeast phenotypes took 0.00026226043701171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Yeast phenotypes took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ypo took 2.6203479766845703s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0005605220794677734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.27791619300842285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0218048095703125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0006988048553466797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0007545948028564453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-zfa took 2.7051706314086914s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.0013358592987060547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.26180267333984375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.020792484283447266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.0007188320159912109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bioportal_link took 3.5346109867095947s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioSamples RDF took 0.4242699146270752s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioSamples RDF took 0.0002703666687011719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioSamples RDF took 0.26221418380737305s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioSamples RDF took 0.020448684692382812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioSamples RDF took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioSamples RDF took 0.0007123947143554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioSamples RDF took 3.409385681152344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioSamples RDF took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biosamples-rdf took 3.4449894428253174s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.18419384956359863s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.00026297569274902344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.2817363739013672s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.02056097984313965s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 1.71661376953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.0007312297821044922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.00011444091796875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bis-linked-data took 2.6310982704162598s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bitzi took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bitzi took 0.00025844573974609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bitzi took 0.28786587715148926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bitzi took 0.020536184310913086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bitzi took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bitzi took 0.0007205009460449219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bitzi took 2.86102294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bitzi took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bitzi took 2.943110942840576s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BizkaiSense took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BizkaiSense took 0.0002562999725341797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BizkaiSense took 0.24314022064208984s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BizkaiSense took 0.020890474319458008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BizkaiSense took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BizkaiSense took 0.0007102489471435547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BizkaiSense took 2.86102294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BizkaiSense took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bizkaisense took 2.9723870754241943s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for blabla.itemlist took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for blabla.itemlist took 0.0003795623779296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for blabla.itemlist took 0.2975740432739258s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for blabla.itemlist took 0.021212339401245117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for blabla.itemlist took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for blabla.itemlist took 0.0007908344268798828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for blabla.itemlist took 3.4332275390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for blabla.itemlist took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for blabla-itemlist took 2.9571855068206787s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for blabla.itemlist took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for blabla.itemlist took 0.00024056434631347656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for blabla.itemlist took 0.2684774398803711s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for blabla.itemlist took 0.020381450653076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for blabla.itemlist took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for blabla.itemlist took 0.0007193088531494141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for blabla.itemlist took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for blabla.itemlist took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for blabla_itemlist took 2.8678879737854004s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 6.222724914550781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.0012733936309814453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.2694234848022461s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.020505666732788086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.0007145404815673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 3.910064697265625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bll-thesaurus took 3.5345699787139893s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.5135207176208496s
Availability | VoID file availability check for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.0005960464477539062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.2687840461730957s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.020415544509887695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.0006959438323974609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 6.318092346191406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bluk-bnb took 13.227024555206299s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Thesaurus BNCF took 4.522806406021118s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.0006210803985595703s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Thesaurus BNCF took 41.17809557914734s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.5917139053344727s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.6329033374786377s
Interoperability | New terms check for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.5910921096801758s
Versatility | Languages check for Thesaurus BNCF took 6.496780872344971s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.0130584239959717s
Security | Check HTTPS for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.08084583282470703s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1150667667388916s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.11723542213439941s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.11099720001220703s
License | MR license check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12076735496520996s
License | HR license check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1960277557373047s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.11707830429077148s
Understandability | Number of label check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.24769926071166992s
Understandability | URI regex check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.24063658714294434s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12192249298095703s
Verifiability | Authors check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1171720027923584s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12094855308532715s
Performance | Throughput check for Thesaurus BNCF took 10.846215963363647s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Thesaurus BNCF took 6.318092346191406e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.11123490333557129s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1159520149230957s
Interlinking | skos check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.17294096946716309s
Interlinking | skos check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.15853404998779297s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1188199520111084s
Currency | Creation date check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.23823332786560059s
Currency | Modification date check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.27782559394836426s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Thesaurus BNCF took 25.24159526824951s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Thesaurus BNCF took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.11499214172363281s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1539924144744873s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.10963678359985352s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Thesaurus BNCF took 12.688290357589722s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.5005195140838623s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Thesaurus BNCF took 3.9800775051116943s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.11731147766113281s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.8616690635681152s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Thesaurus BNCF took 6.894674301147461s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Thesaurus BNCF took 9.668192386627197s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.6474523544311523s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Thesaurus BNCF took 2.439857244491577s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Thesaurus BNCF took 2.4582605361938477s
Security | Sign check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.10550308227539062s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Thesaurus BNCF took 21.130106687545776s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.26889657974243164s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.020476579666137695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.8358230590820312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.0007343292236328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Thesaurus BNCF took 7.462501525878906e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Thesaurus BNCF took 2.1457672119140625e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Thesaurus BNCF took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bncf-ns took 187.86042547225952s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.46689271926879883s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.0006935596466064453s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.6061720848083496s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.6249759197235107s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 3.479091167449951s
Interoperability | New terms check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 4.088142395019531s
Versatility | Languages check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 60.40637826919556s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.82686710357666s
Security | Check HTTPS for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.24841880798339844s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.31487417221069336s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.5785312652587891s
Availability | RDF dump link check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.550029993057251s
License | MR license check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.49358057975769043s
License | HR license check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 60.328813552856445s
Amount of data | Number of property check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.31775522232055664s
Understandability | Number of label check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.9013893604278564s
Understandability | URI regex check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.6181223392486572s
Understandability | Vocabs check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.5179648399353027s
Verifiability | Authors check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.33031177520751953s
Verifiability | Publishers check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.24404549598693848s
Performance | Throughput check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 12.208182573318481s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 8.511543273925781e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.35747289657592773s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.34651637077331543s
Interlinking | skos check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3468198776245117s
Interlinking | skos check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.30000996589660645s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.46640634536743164s
Currency | Creation date check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.6731925010681152s
Currency | Modification date check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.31285667419433594s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 17.796621799468994s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 3.337860107421875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.32770442962646484s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.29521751403808594s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.30298829078674316s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.8780980110168457s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.024032115936279297s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.028476953506469727s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3119087219238281s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 13.471352815628052s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.4173240661621094s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.2742977142333984s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.607849359512329s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 14.565075159072876s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.031607866287231445s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3382148742675781s
Security | Sign check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.33161282539367676s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 6.685755729675293s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.25882816314697266s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.021422147750854492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.1219253540039062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.0009000301361083984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 5.221366882324219e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bpr took 383.5825226306915s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brazilian Politicians took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brazilian Politicians took 0.0004940032958984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brazilian Politicians took 0.2665579319000244s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brazilian Politicians took 0.021458148956298828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brazilian Politicians took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brazilian Politicians took 0.000759124755859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brazilian Politicians took 6.771087646484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brazilian Politicians took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for brazilian-politicians took 4.311696767807007s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BrazilianCities took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BrazilianCities took 0.00028014183044433594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BrazilianCities took 0.30077695846557617s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BrazilianCities took 0.020229339599609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BrazilianCities took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BrazilianCities took 0.0006909370422363281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BrazilianCities took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BrazilianCities took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for braziliancities took 3.3663811683654785s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bricklink took 1.639904260635376s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bricklink took 0.00069427490234375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bricklink took 0.26635217666625977s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bricklink took 0.020316123962402344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bricklink took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bricklink took 0.0007097721099853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bricklink took 6.413459777832031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bricklink took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bricklink took 12.384924411773682s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for British Museum Collection took 30.228465795516968s
Availability | VoID file availability check for British Museum Collection took 0.0007493495941162109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for British Museum Collection took 0.27861905097961426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for British Museum Collection took 0.020380735397338867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for British Museum Collection took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for British Museum Collection took 0.000728607177734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for British Museum Collection took 2.765655517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for British Museum Collection took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for british-museum-collection took 73.30027890205383s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.0004363059997558594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.2709624767303467s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.020333051681518555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.0007259845733642578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 3.838539123535156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for brown-corpus-in-rdf-nif took 2.6027896404266357s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for French Plant Health Bulletins took 3.910064697265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.0002715587615966797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.2689049243927002s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.020500898361206055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for French Plant Health Bulletins took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for French Plant Health Bulletins took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for French Plant Health Bulletins took 3.337860107421875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bsv took 3.8262524604797363s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 3.9457790851593018s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.0005838871002197266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.25499987602233887s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.02022552490234375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.0007042884826660156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bulgarian_admissions_to_correctional_facilities took 8.492456436157227s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bund Offener Haushalt took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.000270843505859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.277205228805542s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.02031993865966797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bund Offener Haushalt took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.0007138252258300781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bund Offener Haushalt took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bund Offener Haushalt took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bund-offener-haushalt took 2.9201748371124268s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.00022649765014648438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.27105045318603516s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.020356178283691406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bundestagnebeneinkuenfte took 2.967526435852051s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for business.data.gov.uk took 0.2357616424560547s
Availability | VoID file availability check for business.data.gov.uk took 0.0006742477416992188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for business.data.gov.uk took 0.2593684196472168s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for business.data.gov.uk took 0.021117210388183594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for business.data.gov.uk took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for business.data.gov.uk took 0.0010273456573486328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for business.data.gov.uk took 6.008148193359375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for business.data.gov.uk took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for business-data-gov-uk took 2.656057834625244s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.5275270938873291s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.0007715225219726562s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.5951690673828125s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.4102153778076172s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4389314651489258s
Interoperability | New terms check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.716010332107544s
Versatility | Languages check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 30.254854917526245s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.41869282722473145s
Security | Check HTTPS for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.15214848518371582s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.39870715141296387s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2993299961090088s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.23439931869506836s
License | MR license check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4276878833770752s
License | HR license check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 20.439603328704834s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4754955768585205s
Understandability | Number of label check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4527475833892822s
Understandability | URI regex check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.6858282089233398s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2701907157897949s
Verifiability | Authors check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4167473316192627s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2126471996307373s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 6.818771362304688e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.24137425422668457s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.20192813873291016s
Interlinking | skos check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.24184393882751465s
Interlinking | skos check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.21411466598510742s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.20870065689086914s
Currency | Creation date check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4519355297088623s
Currency | Modification date check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.6170601844787598s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.5005989074707031s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 3.337860107421875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.13113665580749512s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.035997629165649414s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.13142681121826172s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.1505885124206543s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.4857914447784424s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.03261709213256836s
Security | Sign check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.11777877807617188s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 5.496188163757324s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2943127155303955s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.02002859115600586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.0006873607635498047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 5.125999450683594e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for BVMC took 214.5084011554718s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.0002512931823730469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.2829265594482422s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.019723176956176758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.0006797313690185547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 2.9802322387695312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cabbage took 3.3529629707336426s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for cablegate took 1.6004836559295654s
Availability | VoID file availability check for cablegate took 0.0006072521209716797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for cablegate took 0.26250791549682617s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for cablegate took 0.020524263381958008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for cablegate took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for cablegate took 0.0007162094116210938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for cablegate took 6.437301635742188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for cablegate took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cablegate took 17.162747144699097s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Calames took 5.459785461425781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Calames took 0.0006570816040039062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Calames took 0.2735881805419922s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Calames took 0.02053523063659668s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Calames took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Calames took 0.0007219314575195312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Calames took 3.743171691894531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Calames took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for calames took 4.596224308013916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.4043407440185547s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.0002453327178955078s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for CaLiGraph took 1.7105023860931396s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for CaLiGraph took 1.0547211170196533s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for CaLiGraph took 11.82830262184143s
Interoperability | New terms check for CaLiGraph took 2.0633556842803955s
Versatility | Languages check for CaLiGraph took 60.268840074539185s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for CaLiGraph took 0.21689987182617188s
Security | Check HTTPS for CaLiGraph took 0.12427878379821777s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for CaLiGraph took 0.2795236110687256s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for CaLiGraph took 0.27559733390808105s
Availability | RDF dump link check for CaLiGraph took 0.24898648262023926s
License | MR license check for CaLiGraph took 0.3675830364227295s
License | HR license check for CaLiGraph took 60.285781383514404s
Amount of data | Number of property check for CaLiGraph took 0.24277591705322266s
Understandability | Number of label check for CaLiGraph took 3.2110941410064697s
Understandability | URI regex check for CaLiGraph took 0.49871826171875s
Understandability | Vocabs check for CaLiGraph took 0.24370598793029785s
Verifiability | Authors check for CaLiGraph took 0.23798561096191406s
Verifiability | Publishers check for CaLiGraph took 0.25470399856567383s
Performance | Throughput check for CaLiGraph took 11.252520084381104s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for CaLiGraph took 0.01344442367553711s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for CaLiGraph took 30.34221649169922s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for CaLiGraph took 18.3286714553833s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 16.52174472808838s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 22.1697781085968s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for CaLiGraph took 13.360084533691406s
Currency | Creation date check for CaLiGraph took 32.070847034454346s
Currency | Modification date check for CaLiGraph took 33.63272428512573s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for CaLiGraph took 82.6024341583252s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for CaLiGraph took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for CaLiGraph took 18.316922426223755s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 15.168711185455322s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 16.84880828857422s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for CaLiGraph took 8.75141978263855s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for CaLiGraph took 0.026668787002563477s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for CaLiGraph took 0.05034375190734863s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for CaLiGraph took 7.992031097412109s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for CaLiGraph took 95.27008605003357s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for CaLiGraph took 0.5061030387878418s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for CaLiGraph took 2.0509231090545654s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for CaLiGraph took 1.355759620666504s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for CaLiGraph took 61.64388465881348s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.032828569412231445s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.4450235366821289s
Security | Sign check for CaLiGraph took 0.3637361526489258s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for CaLiGraph took 5.702102899551392s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CaLiGraph took 0.27128076553344727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CaLiGraph took 0.02104043960571289s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CaLiGraph took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CaLiGraph took 0.0007097721099853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CaLiGraph took 3.886222839355469e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for CaLiGraph took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CaLiGraph took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CaLiGraph took 1720.3196942806244s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.3559000492095947s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.0005097389221191406s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for CaLiGraph took 18.987666368484497s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for CaLiGraph took 103.68398690223694s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for CaLiGraph took 31.71912670135498s
Interoperability | New terms check for CaLiGraph took 18.62511396408081s
Versatility | Languages check for CaLiGraph took 72.39663815498352s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for CaLiGraph took 13.042492151260376s
Security | Check HTTPS for CaLiGraph took 0.12323331832885742s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for CaLiGraph took 4.65753960609436s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for CaLiGraph took 12.230103969573975s
Availability | RDF dump link check for CaLiGraph took 16.37613844871521s
License | MR license check for CaLiGraph took 5.755494832992554s
License | HR license check for CaLiGraph took 60.45652747154236s
Amount of data | Number of property check for CaLiGraph took 8.290322065353394s
Understandability | Number of label check for CaLiGraph took 14.42822003364563s
Understandability | URI regex check for CaLiGraph took 8.988037347793579s
Understandability | Vocabs check for CaLiGraph took 5.518067359924316s
Verifiability | Authors check for CaLiGraph took 1.1129302978515625s
Verifiability | Publishers check for CaLiGraph took 0.25894999504089355s
Performance | Throughput check for CaLiGraph took 11.091965675354004s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for CaLiGraph took 0.011072158813476562s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for CaLiGraph took 0.2500147819519043s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for CaLiGraph took 0.6176519393920898s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.3055918216705322s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.22743749618530273s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for CaLiGraph took 0.25647783279418945s
Currency | Creation date check for CaLiGraph took 0.5473458766937256s
Currency | Modification date check for CaLiGraph took 0.5114841461181641s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for CaLiGraph took 61.07813620567322s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for CaLiGraph took 4.76837158203125e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for CaLiGraph took 0.23834991455078125s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 0.2185220718383789s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 0.22719478607177734s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for CaLiGraph took 0.5929040908813477s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for CaLiGraph took 0.026491403579711914s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for CaLiGraph took 0.05092144012451172s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for CaLiGraph took 0.2388753890991211s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for CaLiGraph took 60.88540077209473s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for CaLiGraph took 0.43137216567993164s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for CaLiGraph took 2.133126974105835s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for CaLiGraph took 1.421804666519165s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for CaLiGraph took 61.707385301589966s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.030225753784179688s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.427077054977417s
Security | Sign check for CaLiGraph took 0.22174882888793945s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for CaLiGraph took 22.132100582122803s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CaLiGraph took 1.3541667461395264s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CaLiGraph took 0.020841360092163086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CaLiGraph took 1.4781951904296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CaLiGraph took 0.0008745193481445312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CaLiGraph took 9.274482727050781e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for CaLiGraph took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CaLiGraph took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for caligraph took 2650.985594034195s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for can-link took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for can-link took 0.0002703666687011719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for can-link took 0.24675917625427246s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for can-link took 0.02090001106262207s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for can-link took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for can-link took 0.0007281303405761719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for can-link took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for can-link took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for can-link took 5.1244776248931885s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.060392141342163086s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.0004601478576660156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.7050297260284424s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.02087116241455078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.0007348060607910156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for cap-italy-rdf took 4.73722505569458s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for person took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for person took 0.000263214111328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for person took 0.27802181243896484s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for person took 0.02123737335205078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for person took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for person took 0.0007224082946777344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for person took 3.2901763916015625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for person took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for card took 3.347817897796631s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0007367134094238281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.25828099250793457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.020723819732666016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0007517337799072266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for catalan-eurowordnet-lemon-lexicon-3-0 took 3.080078363418579s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.0002601146697998047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.25923919677734375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.020686626434326172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.0007448196411132812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for catalogus-professorum-lipsiensis took 3.477543354034424s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.5389747619628906s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.000274658203125s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 120.70676040649414s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.9353134632110596s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 12.416336297988892s
Interoperability | New terms check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 14.311367988586426s
Versatility | Languages check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 300.18763041496277s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.458479881286621s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.24025464057922363s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 8.697993040084839s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.2636721134185791s
License | MR license check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.5437045097351074s
License | HR license check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 300.2104768753052s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.46027660369873047s
Understandability | Number of label check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.500124216079712s
Understandability | URI regex check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.8605291843414307s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.44336462020874023s
Verifiability | Authors check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.20296287536621094s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.2691199779510498s
Performance | Throughput check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 11.448120355606079s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 6.985664367675781e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.21007037162780762s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.2143840789794922s
Interlinking | skos check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.45569443702697754s
Interlinking | skos check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.48340845108032227s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 5.4141974449157715s
Currency | Creation date check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.489762544631958s
Currency | Modification date check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.21645712852478027s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 171.7771270275116s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.1940014362335205s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.34201765060424805s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.3463566303253174s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 52.55500888824463s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.697307825088501s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.718665361404419s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.19288349151611328s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 98.41270065307617s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 9.380788326263428s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 36.7488853931427s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.5277481079101562s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 95.09244751930237s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.816274642944336s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.6034157276153564s
Security | Sign check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.9048020839691162s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 4.9095985889434814s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.8803267478942871s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.02412867546081543s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.0007278919219970703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 4.9114227294921875e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.1457672119140625e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for Catch_Record_(2014-_2019) took 2327.333193540573s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.0003707408905029297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.23976516723632812s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.021052837371826172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.0007214546203613281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.00010013580322265625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ce4r took 6.91863489151001s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.4554305076599121s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.0003273487091064453s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.6374130249023438s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.7689802646636963s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.28226518630981445s
Interoperability | New terms check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.7573256492614746s
Versatility | Languages check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 58.138200759887695s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1647632122039795s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3205726146697998s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.19153761863708496s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.14275336265563965s
License | MR license check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.33305859565734863s
License | HR license check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.40428972244262695s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.14043021202087402s
Understandability | Number of label check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3274862766265869s
Understandability | URI regex check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3004758358001709s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.15899324417114258s
Verifiability | Authors check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.20854973793029785s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.2205641269683838s
Performance | Throughput check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 14.96960163116455s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 5.626678466796875e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.21792912483215332s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.4237184524536133s
Interlinking | skos check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.124406099319458s
Interlinking | skos check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.14446306228637695s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.44274425506591797s
Currency | Creation date check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.7405829429626465s
Currency | Modification date check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.37477827072143555s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 2.080233097076416s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1338498592376709s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.2669382095336914s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.26599550247192383s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.6075410842895508s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.030295848846435547s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.02918267250061035s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3583183288574219s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.2036066055297852s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 2.2044243812561035s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.4106557369232178s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.6342251300811768s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.031048297882080078s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.21408653259277344s
Security | Sign check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.16519665718078613s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1902.4804055690765s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.4479527473449707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.02239513397216797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.7404556274414062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.0007042884826660156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ceo took 2052.1114842891693s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Charging Stations took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Charging Stations took 0.000244140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Charging Stations took 0.25829553604125977s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Charging Stations took 0.02069854736328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Charging Stations took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Charging Stations took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Charging Stations took 3.24249267578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Charging Stations took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for charging-stations took 3.762169599533081s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chat Game corpus took 5.698204040527344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chat Game corpus took 0.0007455348968505859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chat Game corpus took 0.7041313648223877s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chat Game corpus took 0.02076125144958496s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chat Game corpus took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chat Game corpus took 0.0007002353668212891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chat Game corpus took 3.337860107421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chat Game corpus took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chat-game-corpus took 13.025943756103516s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.0002694129943847656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.25545549392700195s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.02089691162109375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 3.4332275390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chebi took 4.568103313446045s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chem2Bio2RDF took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.0008285045623779297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.2547953128814697s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.021483421325683594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chem2Bio2RDF took 2.1219253540039062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.0007357597351074219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chem2Bio2RDF took 5.6743621826171875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chem2Bio2RDF took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chem2bio2rdf took 135.03384470939636s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ChEMBL RDF took 0.7711641788482666s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ChEMBL RDF took 0.0005056858062744141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ChEMBL RDF took 0.257828950881958s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ChEMBL RDF took 0.02110147476196289s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ChEMBL RDF took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ChEMBL RDF took 0.0007147789001464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ChEMBL RDF took 5.1975250244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ChEMBL RDF took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chembl-rdf took 5.084765672683716s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb  dataset took 0.9891293048858643s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb  dataset took 0.0003216266632080078s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb  dataset took 7.164365530014038s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb  dataset took 2.5342471599578857s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5212953090667725s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb  dataset took 2.113018274307251s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5266718864440918s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5236525535583496s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5331907272338867s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5120844841003418s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb  dataset took 0.4884021282196045s
License | MR license check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5010428428649902s
License | HR license check for chemdb  dataset took 0.496112585067749s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5319075584411621s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5339300632476807s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb  dataset took 0.9955549240112305s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5042519569396973s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5005221366882324s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb  dataset took 0.4954829216003418s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb  dataset took 12.004751920700073s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb  dataset took 6.937980651855469e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5040407180786133s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5432248115539551s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb  dataset took 0.49357175827026367s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb  dataset took 0.4967498779296875s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb  dataset took 0.49971723556518555s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb  dataset took 1.0324382781982422s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb  dataset took 1.034200668334961s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb  dataset took 1.8097822666168213s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb  dataset took 2.6226043701171875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5248997211456299s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb  dataset took 0.5277907848358154s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb  dataset took 0.5026636123657227s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb  dataset took 0.5322601795196533s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb  dataset took 0.0003094673156738281s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb  dataset took 0.03879547119140625s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb  dataset took 0.49525976181030273s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb  dataset took 1.0157897472381592s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb  dataset took 0.5873370170593262s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb  dataset took 2.330533266067505s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb  dataset took 1.5742449760437012s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb  dataset took 2.080672025680542s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb  dataset took 0.022518396377563477s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb  dataset took 0.539196252822876s
Security | Sign check for chemdb  dataset took 0.48198366165161133s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb  dataset took 289.35813546180725s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb  dataset took 1.2061538696289062s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb  dataset took 0.02141404151916504s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb  dataset took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb  dataset took 0.0007593631744384766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb  dataset took 8.535385131835938e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb  dataset took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb  dataset took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-basicInfo took 375.9455041885376s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5012035369873047s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0002925395965576172s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 7.178313970565796s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.493295669555664s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5308616161346436s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.1455631256103516s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5289022922515869s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5241343975067139s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5266573429107666s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5344433784484863s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4843292236328125s
License | MR license check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5002896785736084s
License | HR license check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.503974437713623s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5248010158538818s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.536914587020874s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.9958412647247314s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5044257640838623s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5003261566162109s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.49544239044189453s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 12.941467523574829s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 8.296966552734375e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.48845553398132324s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5312910079956055s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.48365044593811035s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5037686824798584s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5000414848327637s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.0402066707611084s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.0187499523162842s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.8261315822601318s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 9.5367431640625e-07s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.49836039543151855s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5313539505004883s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4850935935974121s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5347001552581787s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0003733634948730469s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.03441476821899414s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.49636268615722656s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.0145320892333984s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5889358520507812s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.2214715480804443s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.418835163116455s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.9016330242156982s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0209503173828125s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.528465747833252s
Security | Sign check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4975106716156006s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 184.8498499393463s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.8621821403503418s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.02154231071472168s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.7404556274414062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0007174015045166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 5.14984130859375e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-estimatedProperties took 271.1296970844269s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5011889934539795s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.0002772808074951172s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb phase transition dataset took 7.091965675354004s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.49031925201416s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4998149871826172s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.0650546550750732s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4990241527557373s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.49430346488952637s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5068061351776123s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4991598129272461s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.48477935791015625s
License | MR license check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.48914623260498047s
License | HR license check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.49900102615356445s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.48245882987976074s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.509840726852417s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.9884381294250488s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.503610372543335s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5019800662994385s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.49791741371154785s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 12.95472240447998s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb phase transition dataset took 7.176399230957031e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5029103755950928s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.480515718460083s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.48920249938964844s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4995570182800293s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5335617065429688s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.004002332687378s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.9837613105773926s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.790771484375s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 7.152557373046875e-07s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5283355712890625s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5070266723632812s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.49228811264038086s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.508887529373169s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.0002999305725097656s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.03890800476074219s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4989283084869385s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.0049238204956055s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5481226444244385s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.1652348041534424s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.4168686866760254s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.939260721206665s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.020864248275756836s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5049417018890381s
Security | Sign check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4941420555114746s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb phase transition dataset took 311.9460892677307s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.371579647064209s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.021390676498413086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.1219253540039062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.0007207393646240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb phase transition dataset took 5.936622619628906e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb phase transition dataset took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-phaseTransition took 402.34526896476746s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49795103073120117s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.00022172927856445312s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 7.173921823501587s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.484895944595337s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5279529094696045s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.148334503173828s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5124809741973877s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5254697799682617s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5358903408050537s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5309615135192871s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5035641193389893s
License | MR license check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4825742244720459s
License | HR license check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4846487045288086s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5106756687164307s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5352582931518555s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.9989116191864014s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4852867126464844s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.48958277702331543s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4981973171234131s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 13.898398399353027s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 6.389617919921875e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5045871734619141s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5309004783630371s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5037388801574707s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4969465732574463s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5034120082855225s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.0308489799499512s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.0311956405639648s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.8335661888122559s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.48095273971557617s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5576646327972412s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.49961328506469727s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5314300060272217s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.00013566017150878906s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.032745361328125s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4881718158721924s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.0444567203521729s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5727353096008301s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.169372081756592s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.4149065017700195s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.9130163192749023s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.019871234893798828s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5269205570220947s
Security | Sign check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.4846217632293701s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 370.8845314979553s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.8317387104034424s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.021079540252685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.09808349609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.0008068084716796875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 6.437301635742188e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 9.5367431640625e-07s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-thermochemistry took 458.76557445526123s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ChemPedia RDF took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ChemPedia RDF took 0.0008828639984130859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ChemPedia RDF took 0.2780802249908447s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ChemPedia RDF took 0.021776437759399414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ChemPedia RDF took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ChemPedia RDF took 0.0007314682006835938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ChemPedia RDF took 3.4809112548828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ChemPedia RDF took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chempedia-rdf took 9.923272848129272s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chiman Maru took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chiman Maru took 0.0002961158752441406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chiman Maru took 0.24312949180603027s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chiman Maru took 0.021055221557617188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chiman Maru took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chiman Maru took 0.0007827281951904297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chiman Maru took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chiman Maru took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ChimanMaru_Entrepreneur took 3.22135329246521s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.7106316089630127s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.00064849853515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.26573634147644043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.021297454833984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 1.7404556274414062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.001028299331665039s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 3.886222839355469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 9.775161743164062e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Chinese_Red_Classic_Song_Linked_Data_Dataset took 6.080653667449951s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chronicling America took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chronicling America took 0.000667572021484375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chronicling America took 0.2791886329650879s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chronicling America took 0.0209958553314209s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chronicling America took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chronicling America took 0.0007138252258300781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chronicling America took 0.00010466575622558594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chronicling America took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chronicling-america took 7.3273632526397705s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.6763012409210205s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.0007665157318115234s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 140.22041273117065s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 1.923232078552246s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.7138760089874268s
