Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 5.030632019042969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0007686614990234375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.28038930892944336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.6601972579956055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0007276535034179688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0003886222839355469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 0080-3626 took 5.469014406204224s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用图 took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用图 took 0.0004050731658935547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用图 took 0.7169592380523682s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用图 took 0.02324080467224121s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用图 took 3.24249267578125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用图 took 0.0014960765838623047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用图 took 4.696846008300781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用图 took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 10.12041geodata.290864223.ver1.db_ took 3.4320068359375s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 113322 took 4.935264587402344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 113322 took 0.0004279613494873047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 113322 took 0.2810652256011963s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 113322 took 0.020124435424804688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 113322 took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 113322 took 0.0007233619689941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 113322 took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 113322 took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for 11 took 4.689820051193237s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Korepetycje Buki took 0.0005526542663574219s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Korepetycje Buki took 0.0003154277801513672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Korepetycje Buki took 0.28540492057800293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Korepetycje Buki took 0.02068352699279785s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Korepetycje Buki took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Korepetycje Buki took 0.00089263916015625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Korepetycje Buki took 3.600120544433594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Korepetycje Buki took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 12323 took 2.5126149654388428s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.05313825607299805s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.00036025047302246094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.2919638156890869s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.019942045211791992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.0007905960083007812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 9.274482727050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 2000-us-census-rdf took 2.594465732574463s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 2.214901924133301s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.0007231235504150391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.28487515449523926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.021738290786743164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.0007367134094238281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 2001-spanish-census-to-rdf took 6.6278369426727295s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Open Data Web took 0.28287315368652344s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Open Data Web took 0.00033283233642578125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Open Data Web took 0.28473997116088867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Open Data Web took 0.02309894561767578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Open Data Web took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Open Data Web took 0.0010294914245605469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Open Data Web took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Open Data Web took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data.odw.tw took 2.8177268505096436s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用 took 7.939338684082031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用 took 0.00031447410583496094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用 took 0.2749350070953369s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用 took 0.02298450469970703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用 took 1.7404556274414062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用 took 0.0014019012451171875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用 took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用 took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data1.odw.tw took 2.529024839401245s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用模型 took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用模型 took 0.0005593299865722656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用模型 took 0.28963661193847656s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用模型 took 0.02018904685974121s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用模型 took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用模型 took 0.0007350444793701172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用模型 took 2.9802322387695312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用模型 took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data2.odw.tw took 5.653331279754639s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Indian Biodiversity took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Indian Biodiversity took 0.0006260871887207031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Indian Biodiversity took 0.26552677154541016s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Indian Biodiversity took 0.022665739059448242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Indian Biodiversity took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Indian Biodiversity took 0.0011119842529296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Indian Biodiversity took 3.886222839355469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Indian Biodiversity took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _https:data.bioontology.orgontologiesBOFdownloadapikey=8b5b7825-538d-40e0-9e9e-5ab9274a9aeb&download_format=rdf took 3.5633747577667236s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.0008044242858886719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.2789914608001709s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.02050328254699707s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.0007197856903076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for a-collection-of-papers-for-lrec2014-and-related-workshops took 27.609879732131958s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ITS TEST DATASET took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.00069427490234375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.27335357666015625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.02042078971862793s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ITS TEST DATASET took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.0009572505950927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ITS TEST DATASET took 3.5762786865234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ITS TEST DATASET took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for A1 took 3.031498432159424s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SummerOlympics took 0.9665117263793945s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SummerOlympics took 0.0006623268127441406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SummerOlympics took 0.26793766021728516s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SummerOlympics took 0.022437334060668945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SummerOlympics took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SummerOlympics took 0.0007207393646240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SummerOlympics took 7.104873657226562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SummerOlympics took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for abc took 5.582129955291748s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Test_m took 7.724761962890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Test_m took 0.0007538795471191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Test_m took 0.28386855125427246s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Test_m took 0.020741939544677734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Test_m took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Test_m took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Test_m took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Test_m took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ABC took 2.528341293334961s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for my intro took 6.031990051269531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for my intro took 0.00029754638671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for my intro took 0.2654538154602051s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for my intro took 0.023506641387939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for my intro took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for my intro took 0.001039743423461914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for my intro took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for my intro took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for abhay_intro took 2.4916927814483643s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.8498053550720215s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.00024700164794921875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.27509260177612305s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.020158767700195312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.0007395744323730469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.00010824203491210938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for abs-linked-data took 3.385767936706543s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Academic Offer of UNL took 6.008148193359375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.0002655982971191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.2790961265563965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.02045273780822754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Academic Offer of UNL took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.0007383823394775391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Academic Offer of UNL took 3.4332275390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Academic Offer of UNL took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for academic-offer-of-unl took 3.075373411178589s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AcadOnto took 4.9591064453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AcadOnto took 0.0006415843963623047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AcadOnto took 0.2752058506011963s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AcadOnto took 0.02022266387939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AcadOnto took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AcadOnto took 0.0007755756378173828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AcadOnto took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AcadOnto took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for acadonto took 4.6198203563690186s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 9.555126667022705s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.0006594657897949219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.29564642906188965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.02052474021911621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.0009319782257080078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for acorn-sat took 35.865469455718994s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Addgene took 5.7220458984375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Addgene took 0.0007503032684326172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Addgene took 0.2864396572113037s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Addgene took 0.022928714752197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Addgene took 2.09808349609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Addgene took 0.0013458728790283203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Addgene took 6.842613220214844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Addgene took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for addgene took 15.12605881690979s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.0007805824279785156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.2789764404296875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.020699262619018555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.0007102489471435547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 9.751319885253906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aegp-spanish-textile-and-clothing-association took 5.059295892715454s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.45051097869873047s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.0005893707275390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.2804086208343506s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.023847341537475586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AEMET metereological dataset took 2.5272369384765625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.0014185905456542969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AEMET metereological dataset took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AEMET metereological dataset took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aemet took 4.970430374145508s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Agenda de Zaragoza took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.00033593177795410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.2788379192352295s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.02067255973815918s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Agenda de Zaragoza took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.0008955001831054688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Agenda de Zaragoza took 3.24249267578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Agenda de Zaragoza took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agenda-de-zaragoza took 3.078725576400757s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AgriNepalData took 0.03247213363647461s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AgriNepalData took 0.00028014183044433594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AgriNepalData took 0.27818822860717773s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AgriNepalData took 0.020619630813598633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AgriNepalData took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AgriNepalData took 0.0007867813110351562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AgriNepalData took 7.724761962890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AgriNepalData took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrinepaldata took 3.0088179111480713s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGRIS took 262.1865334510803s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGRIS took 0.0006258487701416016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGRIS took 0.3335127830505371s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGRIS took 0.02075958251953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGRIS took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGRIS took 0.0007183551788330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGRIS took 8.511543273925781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGRIS took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agris took 557.3794679641724s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGROVOC took 0.18794870376586914s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGROVOC took 0.0005753040313720703s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for AGROVOC took 31.184141159057617s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for AGROVOC took 0.48637819290161133s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for AGROVOC took 30.096774339675903s
Interoperability | New terms check for AGROVOC took 3.7719995975494385s
Versatility | Languages check for AGROVOC took 30.096487522125244s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for AGROVOC took 30.097986459732056s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for AGROVOC took 0.10002660751342773s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for AGROVOC took 0.10908627510070801s
Availability | RDF dump link check for AGROVOC took 0.09884881973266602s
License | MR license check for AGROVOC took 0.10184264183044434s
License | HR license check for AGROVOC took 0.6729574203491211s
Amount of data | Number of property check for AGROVOC took 0.09858441352844238s
Understandability | Number of label check for AGROVOC took 30.09855890274048s
Understandability | URI regex check for AGROVOC took 0.19967937469482422s
Understandability | Vocabs check for AGROVOC took 0.1009824275970459s
Verifiability | Authors check for AGROVOC took 0.10404443740844727s
Verifiability | Publishers check for AGROVOC took 0.0988931655883789s
Performance | Throughput check for AGROVOC took 10.795087575912476s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for AGROVOC took 0.0001518726348876953s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for AGROVOC took 0.10390353202819824s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for AGROVOC took 0.09796857833862305s
Interlinking | skos check for AGROVOC took 11.116008996963501s
Interlinking | skos check for AGROVOC took 10.693713426589966s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for AGROVOC took 0.1161503791809082s
Currency | Creation date check for AGROVOC took 0.19809222221374512s
Currency | Modification date check for AGROVOC took 0.20073747634887695s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for AGROVOC took 45.36303472518921s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for AGROVOC took 2.384185791015625e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for AGROVOC took 0.09849047660827637s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for AGROVOC took 21.709917306900024s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for AGROVOC took 3.019429922103882s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for AGROVOC took 0.09843587875366211s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for AGROVOC took 14.5787193775177s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for AGROVOC took 30.102561473846436s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for AGROVOC took 17.495211362838745s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for AGROVOC took 0.0001850128173828125s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for AGROVOC took 0.09986996650695801s
Security | Sign check for AGROVOC took 0.10589981079101562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGROVOC took 0.7729377746582031s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGROVOC took 0.020757675170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGROVOC took 1.71661376953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGROVOC took 0.0007448196411132812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGROVOC took 0.00011992454528808594s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for AGROVOC took 2.1457672119140625e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGROVOC took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrovoc took 399.22967076301575s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGROVOC took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGROVOC took 0.00028014183044433594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGROVOC took 0.7123608589172363s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGROVOC took 0.02004861831665039s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGROVOC took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGROVOC took 0.0007150173187255859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGROVOC took 5.7220458984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGROVOC took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrovoc-skos took 4.847607135772705s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Analytics India Magazine took 1.4133260250091553s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Analytics India Magazine took 0.0006318092346191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Analytics India Magazine took 0.7252404689788818s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Analytics India Magazine took 0.020006656646728516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Analytics India Magazine took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Analytics India Magazine took 0.0008232593536376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Analytics India Magazine took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Analytics India Magazine took 1.1444091796875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for AIM took 6.010299205780029s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for All India Survey of Higher Education took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.0002532005310058594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.2756612300872803s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.019992828369140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for All India Survey of Higher Education took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.0007424354553222656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for All India Survey of Higher Education took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for All India Survey of Higher Education took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AISHE took 2.9105887413024902s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for  equipment ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for  equipment ontology took 0.00026535987854003906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for  equipment ontology took 0.29485034942626953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for  equipment ontology took 0.020105600357055664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for  equipment ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for  equipment ontology took 0.0007383823394775391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for  equipment ontology took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for  equipment ontology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for akash took 2.514190673828125s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.0002961158752441406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.27788448333740234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.020341157913208008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 3.170967102050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aksworg took 3.4745750427246094s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AlchemyAPI took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AlchemyAPI took 0.00026535987854003906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AlchemyAPI took 0.2977886199951172s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AlchemyAPI took 0.02044510841369629s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AlchemyAPI took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AlchemyAPI took 0.0007441043853759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AlchemyAPI took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AlchemyAPI took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alchemyapi took 3.062685251235962s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.0002703666687011719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.2820706367492676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.020378589630126953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.000720977783203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 2.86102294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for alexandria-digital-library-adl-gazetteer took 3.0797078609466553s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for aliada-scanbit-net took 1.2613639831542969s
Availability | VoID file availability check for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.0005030632019042969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.27268385887145996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.02034759521484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for aliada-scanbit-net took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.000110626220703125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for aliada-scanbit-net took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aliada-scanbit-net took 4.909326076507568s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Allen Brain Atlas took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.00027751922607421875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.2931697368621826s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.020206689834594727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Allen Brain Atlas took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.0007448196411132812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Allen Brain Atlas took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Allen Brain Atlas took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for allen-brain-atlas took 3.043409585952759s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.4153404235839844s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.0006844997406005859s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 563.3948392868042s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 3.275665521621704s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.451514720916748s
Interoperability | New terms check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 4.375331878662109s
Versatility | Languages check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 300.0549364089966s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 4.003771066665649s
Security | Check HTTPS for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.8278274536132812s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.8920552730560303s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.7297611236572266s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.744438886642456s
License | MR license check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6064453125s
License | HR license check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 34.986515283584595s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5862209796905518s
Understandability | Number of label check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.722445011138916s
Understandability | URI regex check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1214678287506104s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6011974811553955s
Verifiability | Authors check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.612055778503418s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6001760959625244s
Performance | Throughput check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 12.051902770996094s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 7.295608520507812e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5477454662322998s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5806760787963867s
Interlinking | skos check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6480169296264648s
Interlinking | skos check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6196658611297607s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.674980640411377s
Currency | Creation date check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.2687883377075195s
Currency | Modification date check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.136711835861206s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 204.3375174999237s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5761089324951172s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6246047019958496s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5896732807159424s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 189.4901716709137s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 3.132272481918335s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.7126097679138184s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.7886676788330078s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 11.192816495895386s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 8.987385034561157s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 130.85430359840393s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.393556833267212s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 12.035943984985352s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.70133113861084s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.8540446758270264s
Security | Sign check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5798561573028564s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 13888.460835695267s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.34490108489990234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.023528575897216797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.5987625122070312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.0009169578552246094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.0001976490020751953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.0742416381835938e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for allie-abbreviation-and-long-form-database-in-life-science took 15469.705138921738s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alojamientos took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alojamientos took 0.0002741813659667969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alojamientos took 0.7490191459655762s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alojamientos took 0.020578861236572266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alojamientos took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alojamientos took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alojamientos took 3.170967102050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alojamientos took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alojamientos-zaragoza took 3.9896063804626465s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.3310058116912842s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.0006067752838134766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.2792971134185791s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.020631074905395508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.0007345676422119141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 8.749961853027344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alpino-rdf took 4.31198525428772s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AAT-atawil took 5.6743621826171875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AAT-atawil took 0.0003619194030761719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AAT-atawil took 0.26811838150024414s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AAT-atawil took 0.0207674503326416s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AAT-atawil took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AAT-atawil took 0.0007829666137695312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AAT-atawil took 3.457069396972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AAT-atawil took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Altawil took 3.0098392963409424s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 7.796287536621094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.0002834796905517578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.28630638122558594s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.02077960968017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.000743865966796875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for am-collections-online took 3.114286184310913s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amer Nejma took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amer Nejma took 0.0002593994140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amer Nejma took 0.26605224609375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amer Nejma took 0.020339488983154297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amer Nejma took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amer Nejma took 0.0007219314575195312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amer Nejma took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amer Nejma took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Amer_Nejma took 2.480916738510132s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 5.221366882324219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.0002779960632324219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.28271913528442383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.02082991600036621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.0007283687591552734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 3.8623809814453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for amon took 3.0997097492218018s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.7239112854003906s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.0004611015319824219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.27449846267700195s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.020333528518676758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.0009446144104003906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.00010967254638671875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for amsterdam-museum-as-edm-lod took 3.9603614807128906s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.0002760887145996094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.27978014945983887s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.02068614959716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.0007448196411132812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 3.24249267578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for analisi-del-blog-http-www-beppegrillo-it took 3.1123547554016113s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Animal Diversity Web took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Animal Diversity Web took 0.0003075599670410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Animal Diversity Web took 0.2802879810333252s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Animal Diversity Web took 0.020827531814575195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Animal Diversity Web took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Animal Diversity Web took 0.0008194446563720703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Animal Diversity Web took 3.4809112548828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Animal Diversity Web took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for animal-diversity-web took 3.0942611694335938s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Anime Dataset took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Anime Dataset took 0.0007882118225097656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Anime Dataset took 0.29433441162109375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Anime Dataset took 0.020941734313964844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Anime Dataset took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Anime Dataset took 0.0008821487426757812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Anime Dataset took 3.62396240234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Anime Dataset took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Anime took 3.8294918537139893s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ANNO took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ANNO took 0.0006387233734130859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ANNO took 0.27602362632751465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ANNO took 0.020831823348999023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ANNO took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ANNO took 0.0007159709930419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ANNO took 3.4332275390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ANNO took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for anno took 9.449478149414062s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.0007708072662353516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.27770113945007324s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.024361371994018555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.001291036605834961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.00010633468627929688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AntiqueCarsCollection took 2.976004123687744s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for apache took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for apache took 0.000713348388671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for apache took 0.28136348724365234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for apache took 0.02267622947692871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for apache took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for apache took 0.0007493495941162109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for apache took 6.246566772460938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for apache took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apache took 3.622438430786133s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF took 6.079673767089844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF took 0.0006163120269775391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF took 0.281374454498291s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF took 0.020592689514160156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF took 0.0008285045623779297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF took 4.696846008300781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf took 5.058638334274292s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.0006048679351806641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.27967071533203125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.020622730255126953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.0007801055908203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-ca-it took 6.519457817077637s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.0005793571472167969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.2833538055419922s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.02042555809020996s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.0007488727569580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-ca took 6.31623101234436s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.0006115436553955078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.2801246643066406s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.020258188247680664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.0007374286651611328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-es took 5.998270034790039s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.0006096363067626953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.2801640033721924s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.021172523498535156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.0009262561798095703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 5.14984130859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-gl took 5.983727693557739s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 5.8650970458984375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.000934600830078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.2749969959259033s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.023406982421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.0013511180877685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 5.745887756347656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-ca took 5.982140302658081s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.00043129920959472656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.28127145767211914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.020542144775390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.0007593631744384766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 5.0067901611328125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-en took 5.964381456375122s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.0006134510040283203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.2957034111022949s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.02033090591430664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-es took 5.950328826904297s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.0004200935363769531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.2812685966491699s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.020296573638916016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.0008072853088378906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 4.57763671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-fr took 5.969514846801758s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.0005860328674316406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.2950401306152344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.02017498016357422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.0007436275482177734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-an took 5.987245321273804s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.0005736351013183594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.2740027904510498s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.023698091506958008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 1.6689300537109375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.001453399658203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 6.079673767089844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ast took 5.9429779052734375s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.0005896091461181641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.282085657119751s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.021074295043945312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.0008149147033691406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 4.8160552978515625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ca took 5.6923370361328125s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.0006554126739501953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.26577067375183105s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.020418882369995117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.0007445812225341797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 4.76837158203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-gl took 6.227190256118774s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.0006463527679443359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.2820112705230713s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.021547794342041016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.0007283687591552734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-pt took 5.954427242279053s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.00067138671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.2818491458892822s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.02780747413635254s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.0012183189392089844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 5.7697296142578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ro took 6.378764390945435s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.0005838871002197266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.2815582752227783s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.020349979400634766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.0009119510650634766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 4.76837158203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eu-en took 5.92297887802124s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.0006914138793945312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.2849128246307373s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.02071094512939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.0007388591766357422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eu-es took 5.957475423812866s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 5.14984130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.0007023811340332031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.27893853187561035s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.020947933197021484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.0007359981536865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 4.673004150390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-fr-ca took 5.9255430698394775s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.0006086826324462891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.2818000316619873s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.02048182487487793s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.0007536411285400391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-fr-es took 5.952531099319458s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.0006117820739746094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.2779257297515869s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.021062374114990234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.0007266998291015625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-oc-ca took 5.906937122344971s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.0006628036499023438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.2763800621032715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.020513534545898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.0007424354553222656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-oc-es took 5.929043292999268s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.0005831718444824219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.28442907333374023s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.02091813087463379s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 1.6689300537109375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.0007507801055908203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 4.9114227294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-pt-ca took 5.952409505844116s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 8.296966552734375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.0007078647613525391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.28288745880126953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.020608186721801758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.0007262229919433594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-pt-gl took 6.6811230182647705s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AragoDBPedia took 0.809424877166748s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AragoDBPedia took 0.0006089210510253906s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for AragoDBPedia took 3.0836102962493896s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for AragoDBPedia took 2.1435816287994385s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for AragoDBPedia took 0.9685091972351074s
Interoperability | New terms check for AragoDBPedia took 2.301708221435547s
Versatility | Languages check for AragoDBPedia took 60.54068684577942s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for AragoDBPedia took 4.758089542388916s
Security | Check HTTPS for AragoDBPedia took 0.2507166862487793s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for AragoDBPedia took 0.8666517734527588s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for AragoDBPedia took 1.010406255722046s
Availability | RDF dump link check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4181785583496094s
License | MR license check for AragoDBPedia took 0.6100232601165771s
License | HR license check for AragoDBPedia took 6.146337032318115s
Amount of data | Number of property check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4917795658111572s
Understandability | Number of label check for AragoDBPedia took 0.6065578460693359s
Understandability | URI regex check for AragoDBPedia took 0.96903395652771s
Understandability | Vocabs check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4824638366699219s
Verifiability | Authors check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5447032451629639s
Verifiability | Publishers check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5380635261535645s
Performance | Throughput check for AragoDBPedia took 12.589141845703125s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for AragoDBPedia took 6.985664367675781e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5140640735626221s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5081741809844971s
Interlinking | skos check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5772035121917725s
Interlinking | skos check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4176976680755615s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for AragoDBPedia took 1.5012052059173584s
Currency | Creation date check for AragoDBPedia took 1.766693353652954s
Currency | Modification date check for AragoDBPedia took 0.8556296825408936s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for AragoDBPedia took 6.033685207366943s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for AragoDBPedia took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4903998374938965s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for AragoDBPedia took 0.5370335578918457s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for AragoDBPedia took 0.6318652629852295s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for AragoDBPedia took 1.1653649806976318s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for AragoDBPedia took 0.028607606887817383s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for AragoDBPedia took 0.03191065788269043s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4479048252105713s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for AragoDBPedia took 4.749467611312866s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for AragoDBPedia took 0.7177126407623291s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for AragoDBPedia took 3.225295066833496s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for AragoDBPedia took 1.5597584247589111s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for AragoDBPedia took 5.605409145355225s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for AragoDBPedia took 0.03569793701171875s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for AragoDBPedia took 0.6358520984649658s
Security | Sign check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5930845737457275s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for AragoDBPedia took 3483.8514461517334s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AragoDBPedia took 1.0830388069152832s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AragoDBPedia took 0.024886608123779297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AragoDBPedia took 2.0742416381835938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AragoDBPedia took 0.0010204315185546875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AragoDBPedia took 0.00012183189392089844s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for AragoDBPedia took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AragoDBPedia took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aragodbpedia took 14150.095848321915s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archives Hub Linked Data took 30.363890886306763s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.0008218288421630859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.759418249130249s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.02085590362548828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archives Hub Linked Data took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.0007584095001220703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archives Hub Linked Data took 5.9604644775390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archives Hub Linked Data took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for archiveshub-linkeddata took 84.90256309509277s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archivi ISMA took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archivi ISMA took 0.00034999847412109375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archivi ISMA took 0.7236943244934082s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archivi ISMA took 0.025838136672973633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archivi ISMA took 2.2172927856445312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archivi ISMA took 0.0013546943664550781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archivi ISMA took 4.935264587402344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archivi ISMA took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for archivio-isma took 4.834518194198608s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ARIADNE took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ARIADNE took 0.0003552436828613281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ARIADNE took 0.29742932319641113s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ARIADNE took 0.021787643432617188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ARIADNE took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ARIADNE took 0.0009562969207763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ARIADNE took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ARIADNE took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ariadne took 3.543156623840332s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Aristotle University took 5.650520324707031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Aristotle University took 0.0002593994140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Aristotle University took 0.28032660484313965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Aristotle University took 0.020875215530395508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Aristotle University took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Aristotle University took 0.0007874965667724609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Aristotle University took 3.2901763916015625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Aristotle University took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aristotle-university took 3.0600056648254395s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 4.867018699645996s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.000579833984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.2797508239746094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.021502256393432617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.0007257461547851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress-e-afmx-1 took 21.414266347885132s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.0002548694610595703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.27964234352111816s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.020835399627685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.0007493495941162109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 3.504753112792969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress_e-afmx-4 took 3.060295820236206s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 3.930624008178711s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.0005207061767578125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.26976776123046875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.020676374435424805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.0007433891296386719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress_e-mtab-104 took 17.531432151794434s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.0006952285766601562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.28427696228027344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.02050304412841797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.0007395744323730469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.00010728836059570312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for artenuevosmedios-gnoss took 8.288214683532715s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.00023126602172851562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.2754201889038086s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.020431995391845703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.0007123947143554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Arthron took 2.441906213760376s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Arthroscopy community took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Arthroscopy community took 0.0005812644958496094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Arthroscopy community took 0.27858424186706543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Arthroscopy community took 0.020418643951416016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Arthroscopy community took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Arthroscopy community took 0.0007524490356445312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Arthroscopy community took 0.00010466575622558594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Arthroscopy community took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arthroscopy took 3.166531562805176s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.0392563343048096s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0007219314575195312s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09724617004394531s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09669137001037598s
Versatility | Languages check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0947422981262207s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09499025344848633s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09436893463134766s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09715771675109863s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09517288208007812s
License | MR license check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09587407112121582s
License | HR license check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09730124473571777s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09383749961853027s
Understandability | Number of label check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09577608108520508s
Understandability | URI regex check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.1904754638671875s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09358954429626465s
Verifiability | Authors check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09398388862609863s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0987846851348877s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.00014972686767578125s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09549164772033691s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09538769721984863s
Interlinking | skos check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09351420402526855s
Interlinking | skos check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0931708812713623s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09412097930908203s
Currency | Creation date check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.19246816635131836s
Currency | Modification date check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.18918967247009277s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.18802595138549805s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 4.76837158203125e-07s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09523582458496094s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09664416313171387s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0961296558380127s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.5520203113555908s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.00015878677368164062s
Security | Sign check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.09040498733520508s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.26502346992492676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.020601749420166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 7.152557373046875e-07s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for artxscienceinternational-wikidata took 21.667165756225586s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 3.5075511932373047s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.0006496906280517578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.2808072566986084s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.02025771141052246s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.0007257461547851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 7.796287536621094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-_NTM-Formosan-Aborigines took 13.152478218078613s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 2.499192953109741s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.0006546974182128906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.26799964904785156s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.021405935287475586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.0007483959197998047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 8.440017700195312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks took 11.631255865097046s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 2.498547077178955s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.0007369518280029297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.288311243057251s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.021039724349975586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.0007333755493164062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 9.322166442871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-AS-TFD-Fish-Species took 12.776287317276001s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 2.504356622695923s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.0008337497711181641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.2726621627807617s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.03031325340270996s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 1.9311904907226562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.0014405250549316406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 7.510185241699219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-CRB took 14.99941372871399s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 2.4961700439453125s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.0005598068237304688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.2796337604522705s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.0213472843170166s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.0007562637329101562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 9.918212890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-CTS-TV-Programs took 12.189733505249023s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 2.503380537033081s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.0008437633514404297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.269167423248291s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.029530763626098633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 2.0503997802734375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.0014884471893310547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 6.794929504394531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-DQOT took 13.414360046386719s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 2.504725217819214s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.0007240772247314453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.3002142906188965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.028909683227539062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 1.811981201171875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.0014672279357910156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.00012731552124023438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-IHP-WCD took 13.410910606384277s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 3.318315267562866s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.0007166862487792969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.2838473320007324s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.028456449508666992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 2.0265579223632812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.001512765884399414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.00013303756713867188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Linked-Taiwan-Artists took 14.219246625900269s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 2.505992889404297s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.0007758140563964844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.26866817474365234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.02108287811279297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.0007257461547851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 5.9604644775390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan took 12.202664375305176s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 2.5004518032073975s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.0007898807525634766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.27975893020629883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.02091503143310547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.0007455348968505859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 5.602836608886719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths took 12.209088563919067s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 4.269379138946533s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.0008103847503662109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.2835657596588135s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.03034377098083496s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 2.4080276489257812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.0014870166778564453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 8.440017700195312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Qing-Secret-Societies took 16.991262197494507s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 2.506789445877075s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.0006930828094482422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.2834136486053467s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.02912759780883789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 2.5510787963867188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.0017933845520019531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.00014400482177734375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Tibetan-Audio-Archive took 11.711062908172607s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 2.4959938526153564s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.0006501674652099609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.2796916961669922s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.021088123321533203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.0007317066192626953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 8.559226989746094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC_-_CCP_Archive took 13.30367636680603s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 2.5011112689971924s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.0006892681121826172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.29886865615844727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.02091193199157715s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.0007336139678955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 5.1021575927734375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC_-_DNB took 11.637760877609253s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.0005395412445068359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.28448057174682617s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.021169424057006836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.0007345676422119141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 7.414817810058594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asit took 8.63842487335205s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.0007476806640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.28794050216674805s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.02060532569885254s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.0007333755493164062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asjp took 4.936629295349121s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ASN:US took 0.10135245323181152s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ASN:US took 0.0002830028533935547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ASN:US took 0.27773523330688477s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ASN:US took 0.020492076873779297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ASN:US took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ASN:US took 0.0007686614990234375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ASN:US took 7.700920104980469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ASN:US took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asn-us took 6.51621150970459s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.0005700588226318359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.2795839309692383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.02170562744140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.0007321834564208984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 3.5762786865234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aspire-mmu took 5.113276243209839s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for associations took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for associations took 0.0007364749908447266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for associations took 0.2799346446990967s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for associations took 0.021596670150756836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for associations took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for associations took 0.0007338523864746094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for associations took 7.367134094238281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for associations took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for associations took 7.308373212814331s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.0002472400665283203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.27808070182800293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.02190566062927246s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.0009515285491943359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for atc-publikovan--s-kl took 3.0430595874786377s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.0005114078521728516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.2898831367492676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.02082514762878418s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.0007510185241699219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 9.489059448242188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for athelia-rfid took 4.160073757171631s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.0005805492401123047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.2919013500213623s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.021152496337890625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 0.0007264614105224609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 1.4781951904296875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AuditSocials Social Media Advertising Compliance Glossary took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for auditsocials-glossary took 4.179063081741333s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AUEB Linked Open Data took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.0002644062042236328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.2821497917175293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.02165079116821289s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AUEB Linked Open Data took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.0007448196411132812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AUEB Linked Open Data took 3.600120544433594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AUEB Linked Open Data took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aueb-linked-open-data took 3.08089280128479s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.5437777042388916s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.0007379055023193359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.2865893840789795s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.021346330642700195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 6.198883056640625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AugustiniConfessiones took 4.260039567947388s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.6956076622009277s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.0004961490631103516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.2693140506744385s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.021178007125854492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.0007476806640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 9.322166442871094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for austrian_ski_racers took 4.125468969345093s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AVsOnto took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AVsOnto took 0.0005776882171630859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AVsOnto took 0.29395174980163574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AVsOnto took 0.020972013473510742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AVsOnto took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AVsOnto took 0.0007543563842773438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AVsOnto took 3.5762786865234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AVsOnto took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AVsOnto took 3.4900124073028564s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.20709514617919922s
Availability | VoID file availability check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.0005171298980712891s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 182.13685202598572s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.5334012508392334s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.10287737846375s
Interoperability | New terms check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 201.80999207496643s
Versatility | Languages check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.1011323928833s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.1079273223877s
Security | Check HTTPS for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.32935667037963867s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.2503178119659424s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.1600322723388672s
Availability | RDF dump link check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.11175322532653809s
License | MR license check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 48.41784405708313s
License | HR license check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.10224962234497s
Amount of data | Number of property check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.14904427528381348s
Understandability | Number of label check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 207.88133311271667s
Understandability | URI regex check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.2648811340332031s
Understandability | Vocabs check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.12373208999633789s
Verifiability | Authors check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.09971380233764648s
Verifiability | Publishers check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.11153411865234375s
Performance | Throughput check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 10.48215937614441s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 7.033348083496094e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.10309553146362305s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.1036579608917s
Interlinking | skos check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.15839052200317383s
Interlinking | skos check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.13744640350341797s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.1306626796722412s
Currency | Creation date check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.24684739112854004s
Currency | Modification date check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.28627800941467285s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 433.92991280555725s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 3.337860107421875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.14137721061706543s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 33.80238103866577s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.301553249359131s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 5.19375467300415s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.1382608413696289s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.2250051498413s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 36.523783683776855s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 3.77616286277771s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 301.7841055393219s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.979606866836548s
Security | Sign check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.16072916984558105s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.1142807006835938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.8672003746032715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.021953105926513672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.2172927856445312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.0007340908050537109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 7.987022399902344e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for b3kat took 3905.4561381340027s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BabelNet took 0.6561212539672852s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BabelNet took 0.0006549358367919922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BabelNet took 0.2825734615325928s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BabelNet took 0.021253585815429688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BabelNet took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BabelNet took 0.0007233619689941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BabelNet took 0.00017309188842773438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BabelNet took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for babelnet took 5.748976707458496s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bacevicius.lt took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bacevicius.lt took 0.0002715587615966797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bacevicius.lt took 0.28049254417419434s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bacevicius.lt took 0.02074599266052246s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bacevicius.lt took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bacevicius.lt took 0.0007293224334716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bacevicius.lt took 3.6716461181640625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bacevicius.lt took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bacevicius.lt took 3.3577558994293213s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.5856478214263916s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.000514984130859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.2824127674102783s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.02075791358947754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.0007269382476806641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 5.221366882324219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bag took 4.7441442012786865s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.34494972229003906s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0002663135528564453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.2790560722351074s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.02217721939086914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0008103847503662109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue took 3.289705991744995s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for baixue composer took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for baixue composer took 0.0005452632904052734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for baixue composer took 0.26226806640625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for baixue composer took 0.020904064178466797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for baixue composer took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for baixue composer took 0.0007519721984863281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for baixue composer took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for baixue composer took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_composer took 2.9699792861938477s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.00029540061950683594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.2710099220275879s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.02059459686279297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0007393360137939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 3.457069396972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_imagery took 3.1255903244018555s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.00042438507080078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.27922892570495605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.02076435089111328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0007164478302001953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 3.170967102050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_imagery1 took 3.433563470840454s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BAMS took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BAMS took 0.0002484321594238281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BAMS took 0.2840766906738281s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BAMS took 0.021287202835083008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BAMS took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BAMS took 0.0007205009460449219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BAMS took 5.555152893066406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BAMS took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bams took 3.0145068168640137s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 7.939338684082031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0004987716674804688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.27184581756591797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.02099299430847168s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.000736236572265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.57763671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for basque-eurowordnet-lemon-lexicon-3-0 took 3.022718906402588s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Music took 0.46727776527404785s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Music took 0.0006680488586425781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Music took 0.2643587589263916s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Music took 0.020934581756591797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Music took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Music took 0.0007538795471191406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Music took 0.00013065338134765625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Music took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-music took 3.6767501831054688s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Programmes took 0.32495784759521484s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Programmes took 0.0007829666137695312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Programmes took 0.28316497802734375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Programmes took 0.02257847785949707s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Programmes took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Programmes took 0.0011463165283203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Programmes took 0.00014066696166992188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Programmes took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-programmes took 11.166806697845459s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.34302616119384766s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.0007750988006591797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.28188514709472656s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.020750999450683594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Wildlife Finder took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.0007278919219970703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.00011205673217773438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Wildlife Finder took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-wildlife-finder took 9.796798467636108s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBOP took 6.699562072753906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBOP took 0.0002522468566894531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBOP took 0.279155969619751s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBOP took 0.020576953887939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBOP took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBOP took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBOP took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBOP took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbop took 3.0923686027526855s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBOP took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBOP took 0.0009312629699707031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBOP took 0.2819020748138428s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBOP took 0.0205533504486084s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBOP took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBOP took 0.0007278919219970703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBOP took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBOP took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbop-selected took 20.27250075340271s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bdgp took 2.04020094871521s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bdgp took 0.0006651878356933594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bdgp took 0.2795279026031494s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bdgp took 0.020720481872558594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bdgp took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bdgp took 0.0007166862487792969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bdgp took 3.24249267578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bdgp took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bdgp took 9.204283237457275s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bendev Junior took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bendev Junior took 0.0006170272827148438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bendev Junior took 0.2646183967590332s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bendev Junior took 0.02063608169555664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bendev Junior took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bendev Junior took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bendev Junior took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bendev Junior took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bendevoficial took 5.241572141647339s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 4.5380027294158936s
Availability | VoID file availability check for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.00040602684020996094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.2791299819946289s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.0208890438079834s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.0007777214050292969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 7.2479248046875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for beneficiaries-of-the-european-commission took 12.545583963394165s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.00026035308837890625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.2807590961456299s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.02085566520690918s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.0007257461547851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 3.62396240234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for berlin-offener-haushalt took 3.0848641395568848s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for berlios took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for berlios took 0.00041675567626953125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for berlios took 0.26580381393432617s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for berlios took 0.0205991268157959s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for berlios took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for berlios took 0.0007503032684326172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for berlios took 0.00010204315185546875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for berlios took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for berlios took 3.467590093612671s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Between Our Worlds took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Between Our Worlds took 0.0006697177886962891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Between Our Worlds took 0.33809518814086914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Between Our Worlds took 0.02086615562438965s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Between Our Worlds took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Between Our Worlds took 0.0007302761077880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Between Our Worlds took 6.866455078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Between Our Worlds took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for betweenourworlds took 9.687055587768555s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.5593523979187012s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.0005326271057128906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.2639124393463135s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.020775556564331055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.0007486343383789062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 9.393692016601562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bfs-linked-data took 3.221632957458496s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BibBase took 0.08508563041687012s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BibBase took 0.0002942085266113281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BibBase took 0.29082369804382324s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BibBase took 0.020714998245239258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BibBase took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BibBase took 0.0008366107940673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BibBase took 0.000102996826171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BibBase took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bibbase took 2.6045353412628174s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.0005486011505126953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.28000879287719727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.02059030532836914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.0007348060607910156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.00010156631469726562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-escolar-digital-cita took 6.592209815979004s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.0005483627319335938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.28021907806396484s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.020787954330444336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.0007376670837402344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.0001010894775390625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-nacional-escolar-bnescolar took 3.1541833877563477s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.00024247169494628906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.278217077255249s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.02099919319152832s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.0007600784301757812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 3.409385681152344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-virtual-miguel-de-cervantes-bvmc-linked-open-data took 3.0421557426452637s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.0006549358367919922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.29943203926086426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.03310656547546387s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.0011944770812988281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 4.887580871582031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for BibSonomy took 9.673588037490845s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.00010561943054199219s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.0008139610290527344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.2796437740325928s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.022138118743896484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.0009834766387939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 3.886222839355469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for billion_triples_challenge_dataset2008 took 5.047095775604248s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.0006074905395507812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.2761256694793701s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.020879268646240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.0007367134094238281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for billion_triples_challenge_dataset_2010 took 2.764805316925049s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.00023555755615234375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.2687039375305176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.02142333984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.0007529258728027344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-acfsid took 3.0949418544769287s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 39.022080421447754s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.00028443336486816406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.2728404998779297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.020906686782836914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.0007517337799072266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.00010704994201660156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-affymetrix took 139.08505201339722s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 39.02509546279907s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.00042366981506347656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.28223657608032227s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.021091461181640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.0007507801055908203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.0001277923583984375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-biomodels took 140.1238522529602s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.00048732757568359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.29753851890563965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.026815176010131836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 2.0265579223632812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.001424551010131836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 5.507469177246094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-biomodels-biopax took 3.1291251182556152s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 39.020344495773315s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.0005464553833007812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.35265088081359863s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.020847797393798828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.0007295608520507812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.00043201446533203125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-bioportal took 179.70560884475708s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 39.02227234840393s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.0005877017974853516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.28908419609069824s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.02855706214904785s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.0015261173248291016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 8.320808410644531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-chembl took 179.83734107017517s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 39.038565158843994s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.0007622241973876953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.3328099250793457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.021626710891723633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 1.9073486328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.0008180141448974609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 6.341934204101562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-clinicaltrials took 180.58501815795898s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 39.022998094558716s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.0004985332489013672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.2824723720550537s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.021051406860351562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.0007710456848144531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 7.414817810058594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 9.775161743164062e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ctd took 139.95816826820374s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-dataset took 7.2479248046875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.0007143020629882812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.2661564350128174s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.02078557014465332s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-dataset took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.0007660388946533203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-dataset took 5.173683166503906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-dataset took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-dataset took 23.349275588989258s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 39.02158737182617s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.0007441043853759766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.33919262886047363s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.021404743194580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.0007495880126953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 6.67572021484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-dbsnp took 179.572838306427s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 39.0237352848053s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.0005393028259277344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.28764796257019043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.021418094635009766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.0007636547088623047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.00019669532775878906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-drugbank took 162.43010568618774s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 39.02291417121887s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.0006721019744873047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.8233091831207275s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.030499696731567383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Genage took 1.7881393432617188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.0013148784637451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.00010156631469726562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Genage took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-genage took 180.34279680252075s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.00029468536376953125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.7137417793273926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.0208590030670166s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.0007507801055908203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 6.198883056640625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-genbank took 3.8664677143096924s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 39.022499322891235s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.0005815029144287109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.28661584854125977s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.020645618438720703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.0007259845733642578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 5.459785461425781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-gendr took 180.591290473938s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 39.021268129348755s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.0005323886871337891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.750006914138794s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.0208892822265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Goa took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.0007212162017822266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Goa took 5.936622619628906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Goa took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-goa took 140.9654574394226s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 39.02364420890808s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.0005526542663574219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.28529906272888184s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.029323577880859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 2.1457672119140625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.0014951229095458984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.000148773193359375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-hgnc took 139.50129103660583s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 39.0243935585022s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.0005278587341308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.7223429679870605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.02103424072265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.0007407665252685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 6.222724914550781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-homologene took 140.25648736953735s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::INOH took 7.319450378417969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.00024247169494628906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.2751145362854004s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.022410154342651367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::INOH took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.0008487701416015625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::INOH took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::INOH took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-inoh took 3.0825035572052s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 39.02116274833679s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.0004208087921142578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.7611804008483887s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.021500825881958008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 2.3603439331054688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.00078582763671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.00010514259338378906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-interpro took 140.30905437469482s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 39.02014684677124s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.0005669593811035156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.7611501216888428s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.020932435989379883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.00072479248046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 8.177757263183594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-iproclass took 179.99202275276184s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 39.02348756790161s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.00042057037353515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.7260897159576416s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.021088123321533203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.0007483959197998047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 8.702278137207031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-irefindex took 140.8725688457489s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.0003120899200439453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.7249448299407959s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.021236896514892578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.0007269382476806641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 6.67572021484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-kegg took 3.515532970428467s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 4.792213439941406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.0002453327178955078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.27904176712036133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.020992279052734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.0007281303405761719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 3.4332275390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-kegg-biopax took 3.9270691871643066s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 39.02139973640442s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.0004589557647705078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.37452054023742676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.022542238235473633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.0007505416870117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 3.695487976074219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-linkedspl took 180.2274739742279s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 39.02229571342468s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.0005311965942382812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.7147500514984131s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.02175140380859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.0007317066192626953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 6.604194641113281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-lsr took 140.36214971542358s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 39.02311325073242s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.0006415843963623047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.26594972610473633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.021702051162719727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.0007812976837158203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 8.034706115722656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-mesh took 139.95580005645752s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 39.02354407310486s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.0005407333374023438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.4941868782043457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.021587848663330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.0008907318115234375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.00010609626770019531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-mgi took 180.45615315437317s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 39.023189067840576s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.0006418228149414062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.4008145332336426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.021793842315673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 1.9550323486328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.0007815361022949219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.00013709068298339844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ncbigene took 179.92720246315002s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 39.01828169822693s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.00045990943908691406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.7150721549987793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.021201372146606445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.0007467269897460938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 5.53131103515625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ndc took 141.11962246894836s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.0004019737243652344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.29810333251953125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.021010398864746094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.0007610321044921875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-netpath took 3.956563949584961s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 39.01189589500427s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.0006866455078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.7554748058319092s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.022354602813720703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 2.2649765014648438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.0010323524475097656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-nextprot took 101.36023378372192s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 39.020219564437866s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.0004706382751464844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.33655238151550293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.02122354507446289s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Omim took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.0007321834564208984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.00012826919555664062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Omim took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-omim took 140.40265893936157s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 4.9114227294921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.0006918907165527344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.27901721000671387s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.020739316940307617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.0007410049438476562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 22.939894199371338s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 39.02000164985657s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.0005252361297607422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.28385138511657715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.020778417587280273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.0016803741455078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.00015306472778320312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-orphanet took 179.67032098770142s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 39.024909019470215s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.0004048347473144531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.2914547920227051s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.021095752716064453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 1.7404556274414062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.0007352828979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 3.743171691894531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pathwaycommons took 180.12652802467346s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 39.01722502708435s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.0005369186401367188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.28327131271362305s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.021088123321533203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.0007503032684326172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 7.367134094238281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pharmgkb took 140.35987162590027s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 6.29425048828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.0002796649932861328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.29483985900878906s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.020981550216674805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 3.62396240234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pharmgkb-biopax took 4.405594110488892s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PID took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.00026345252990722656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.3060734272003174s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.02210259437561035s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PID took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.0007231235504150391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PID took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PID took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pid took 3.1130034923553467s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 4.8160552978515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.0002732276916503906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.2790036201477051s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.021945953369140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.0007548332214355469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pubchem-2 took 3.105907917022705s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 39.025315046310425s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.0007691383361816406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.7235598564147949s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.02067279815673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.0007181167602539062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.00013875961303710938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pubmed took 160.53863763809204s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.0006587505340576172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.2832601070404053s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.020805835723876953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.0007410049438476562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 7.748603820800781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-reactome took 3.0902726650238037s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.00027632713317871094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.2863168716430664s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.02072000503540039s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.0007441043853759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 5.626678466796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-rhea took 3.5890519618988037s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 39.02288222312927s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.0005307197570800781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.2694554328918457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.02093505859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.0007715225219726562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 7.963180541992188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sabiork took 140.4264359474182s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 39.02171564102173s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.0004477500915527344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.30722808837890625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.024199485778808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.0010302066802978516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.0001285076141357422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sgd took 139.85999298095703s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.0007407665252685547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.28494858741760254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.021538257598876953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 9.775161743164062e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 23.86675500869751s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 39.02044892311096s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.0011081695556640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.3824460506439209s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.020981788635253906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sider took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.0007593631744384766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sider took 4.982948303222656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sider took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sider took 180.372793674469s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 4.9114227294921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.0005393028259277344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.2897357940673828s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.030000925064086914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 2.288818359375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.001611948013305664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 6.365776062011719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 9.775161743164062e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-spike took 3.233455181121826s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-taxon took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.0007791519165039062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.7463252544403076s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.04324626922607422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-taxon took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.003169536590576172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.00013709068298339844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-taxon took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-taxon took 23.595624685287476s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 39.022432804107666s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.0006396770477294922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.27933526039123535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.0270082950592041s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.0009784698486328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.00013303756713867188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-taxonomy took 139.6348807811737s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 39.02166962623596s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.0005865097045898438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.316129207611084s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.02160358428955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.0008320808410644531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-wikipathways took 180.18600726127625s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 39.02358317375183s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.0005345344543457031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.2838118076324463s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.025781631469726562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 1.7642974853515625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.0012924671173095703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 9.918212890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-wormbase took 140.40560674667358s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biografías y Vidas took 4.839897155761719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biografías y Vidas took 0.0003383159637451172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biografías y Vidas took 0.2811598777770996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biografías y Vidas took 0.021256446838378906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biografías y Vidas took 1.9550323486328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biografías y Vidas took 0.000820159912109375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biografías y Vidas took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biografías y Vidas took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biografiasyvidas took 3.3684866428375244s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.2610459327697754s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.0003008842468261719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.28411149978637695s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.021430492401123047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.0007879734039306641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 9.489059448242188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biographical-directory-of-the-united-states-congress took 2.831326961517334s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.00037479400634765625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.28384995460510254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.021045923233032227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 2.0742416381835938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.000978231430053711s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for biolit took 3.525601387023926s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.0007650852203369141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.28398704528808594s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.024164199829101562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.0007624626159667969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 5.14984130859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biolod-pdb took 7.856596231460571s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioModels RDF took 0.7563111782073975s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioModels RDF took 0.0006804466247558594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioModels RDF took 0.2799866199493408s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioModels RDF took 0.022884845733642578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioModels RDF took 1.7404556274414062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioModels RDF took 0.0011856555938720703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioModels RDF took 5.364418029785156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioModels RDF took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for biomodels-rdf took 4.079463243484497s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 2.927842617034912s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.0007379055023193359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.28185129165649414s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.020834684371948242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 1.4781951904296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.0007760524749755859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Biop took 7.371378660202026s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 5.8650970458984375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.0006349086761474609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.2833845615386963s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.023981094360351562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 1.6689300537109375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.0012383460998535156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 5.030632019042969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bioportal took 2.6712794303894043s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amphibian gross anatomy took 4.76837158203125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0005860328674316406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.28566598892211914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.021387338638305664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amphibian gross anatomy took 1.8835067749023438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0013303756713867188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0008015632629394531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amphibian gross anatomy took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aao took 2.9603829383850098s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 6.246566772460938e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.0005047321319580078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.28146862983703613s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.021467208862304688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.0007307529449462891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.00032329559326171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aba took 2.7863686084747314s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.0005230903625488281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.2823612689971924s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.022198200225830078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.0007512569427490234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.0016787052154541016s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-acgt took 2.766652822494507s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Animal natural history and life history took 6.151199340820312e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Animal natural history and life history took 0.0005435943603515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Animal natural history and life history took 0.2814335823059082s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Animal natural history and life history took 0.021195411682128906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Animal natural history and life history took 1.6689300537109375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Animal natural history and life history took 0.0009877681732177734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Animal natural history and life history took 0.00043511390686035156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Animal natural history and life history took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-adw took 2.7621960639953613s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.0005052089691162109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.2792477607727051s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.020786762237548828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.0007283687591552734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.00048279762268066406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aeo took 2.764580488204956s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 5.245208740234375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0005540847778320312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.27811145782470703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.02097797393798828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0007643699645996094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0009906291961669922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aero took 2.7813303470611572s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AI/RHEUM took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AI/RHEUM took 0.0004973411560058594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AI/RHEUM took 0.27779388427734375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AI/RHEUM took 0.020917177200317383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AI/RHEUM took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AI/RHEUM took 0.0007569789886474609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AI/RHEUM took 0.00041103363037109375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AI/RHEUM took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-air took 2.801236152648926s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amino Acid took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amino Acid took 0.0004987716674804688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amino Acid took 0.28061962127685547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amino Acid took 0.021231651306152344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amino Acid took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amino Acid took 0.0007345676422119141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amino Acid took 0.0002715587615966797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amino Acid took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-amino-acid took 2.7801008224487305s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.0005314350128173828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.27761125564575195s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.020840167999267578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.0007283687591552734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.0002994537353515625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-apo took 2.7680156230926514s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for African Traditional Medicine took 4.792213439941406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for African Traditional Medicine took 0.0006601810455322266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for African Traditional Medicine took 0.28809046745300293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for African Traditional Medicine took 0.021115541458129883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for African Traditional Medicine took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for African Traditional Medicine took 0.0007605552673339844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for African Traditional Medicine took 0.0002753734588623047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for African Traditional Medicine took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-atmo took 2.878056287765503s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amphibian taxonomy took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.0004990100860595703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.28141212463378906s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.021664857864379883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amphibian taxonomy took 1.7404556274414062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.0007300376892089844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amphibian taxonomy took 9.441375732421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amphibian taxonomy took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ato took 2.7171051502227783s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioAssay Ontology took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0005099773406982422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioAssay Ontology took 0.2777986526489258s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioAssay Ontology took 0.02106332778930664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioAssay Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0013523101806640625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioAssay Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bao took 2.7257936000823975s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 8.678436279296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.0005128383636474609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.2965114116668701s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.021449565887451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.0007343292236328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.0003981590270996094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-basic-vertebrate-gross-anatomy took 2.80322527885437s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.0005245208740234375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.26808738708496094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.021366596221923828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.0007848739624023438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.00033974647521972656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bcgo took 2.75424861907959s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 5.841255187988281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.0006258487701416016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.28115391731262207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.021239757537841797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.0007421970367431641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.0014491081237792969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bdo took 2.764371156692505s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basic Formal Ontology took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0005085468292236328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.2817690372467041s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.029658794403076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basic Formal Ontology took 2.1696090698242188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0014057159423828125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0008332729339599609s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basic Formal Ontology took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bfo took 2.776538610458374s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bleeding History Phenotype took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.0005018711090087891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.2914738655090332s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.02129673957824707s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bleeding History Phenotype took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.0007605552673339844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.0008018016815185547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bleeding History Phenotype took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bho took 2.787539482116699s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bilateria anatomy took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bilateria anatomy took 0.0005102157592773438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bilateria anatomy took 0.27808141708374023s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bilateria anatomy took 0.021463394165039062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bilateria anatomy took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bilateria anatomy took 0.0007421970367431641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bilateria anatomy took 0.0004813671112060547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bilateria anatomy took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bila took 2.75224232673645s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BIRNLex took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BIRNLex took 0.0010230541229248047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BIRNLex took 0.280505895614624s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BIRNLex took 0.026221752166748047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BIRNLex took 1.9073486328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BIRNLex took 0.0011372566223144531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BIRNLex took 0.0018372535705566406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BIRNLex took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-birnlex took 2.853423833847046s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 7.82012939453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0005204677581787109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.28026485443115234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.020888805389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Regulation Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007381439208984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007824897766113281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Regulation Ontology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bootstrep took 2.7479946613311768s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioPAX took 5.221366882324219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioPAX took 0.0005095005035400391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioPAX took 0.3103921413421631s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioPAX took 0.025223970413208008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioPAX took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioPAX took 0.0010840892791748047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioPAX took 0.00015020370483398438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioPAX took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bp took 2.837738037109375s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.0004951953887939453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.275174617767334s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.021129608154296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.0007596015930175781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.00034546852111816406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bro_x1 took 2.841778039932251s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Spatial Ontology took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Spatial Ontology took 0.0005612373352050781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Spatial Ontology took 0.28889918327331543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Spatial Ontology took 0.020920515060424805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Spatial Ontology took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Spatial Ontology took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Spatial Ontology took 0.00022912025451660156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Spatial Ontology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bspo took 2.8077917098999023s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioTop took 4.696846008300781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioTop took 0.0005993843078613281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioTop took 0.28143763542175293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioTop took 0.021229028701782227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioTop took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioTop took 0.0007734298706054688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioTop took 0.0007138252258300781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioTop took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bt took 2.734769582748413s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 5.173683166503906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.0005822181701660156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.2677288055419922s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.02108311653137207s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.0007510185241699219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.0009436607360839844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bto took 2.7742905616760254s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0004258155822753906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.34908032417297363s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.02176952362060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0007491111755371094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0019271373748779297s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-canco took 3.2379848957061768s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CAO took 4.9114227294921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CAO took 0.0005075931549072266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CAO took 0.2806987762451172s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CAO took 0.020955324172973633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CAO took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CAO took 0.0007431507110595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CAO took 0.00061798095703125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CAO took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cao took 2.8132903575897217s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CareLex took 4.839897155761719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CareLex took 0.0003533363342285156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CareLex took 0.27773332595825195s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CareLex took 0.02136969566345215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CareLex took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CareLex took 0.0007741451263427734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CareLex took 6.0558319091796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CareLex took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-carelex took 2.7716171741485596s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell Cycle Ontology took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.0005576610565185547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.35327696800231934s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.025980234146118164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell Cycle Ontology took 3.790855407714844e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.0017242431640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.0013041496276855469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell Cycle Ontology took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cco took 2.856630325317383s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 4.744529724121094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.0005719661712646484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.27656054496765137s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.021114349365234375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.0007987022399902344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.0002944469451904297s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cdao took 2.7542245388031006s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical entities of biological interest took 5.6743621826171875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0005309581756591797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.27968358993530273s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.020782470703125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical entities of biological interest took 3.361701965332031e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0009112358093261719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0008947849273681641s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical entities of biological interest took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-chebi took 2.7956080436706543s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.0005211830139160156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.2950289249420166s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.021030902862548828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.0007824897766113281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.00029468536376953125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-chem2bio2owl took 2.7694807052612305s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical Information Ontology took 6.103515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0005044937133789062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.2818145751953125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.020848512649536133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical Information Ontology took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0010428428649902344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0008571147918701172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical Information Ontology took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cheminf took 2.747026205062866s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell type took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell type took 0.0005104541778564453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell type took 0.28084683418273926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell type took 0.021043777465820312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell type took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell type took 0.0007467269897460938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell type took 0.0004184246063232422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell type took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cl took 2.730764150619507s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell Line Ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell Line Ontology took 0.0005731582641601562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell Line Ontology took 0.2832672595977783s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell Line Ontology took 0.021326303482055664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell Line Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell Line Ontology took 0.0007193088531494141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell Line Ontology took 0.0008482933044433594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell Line Ontology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-clo took 2.786975860595703s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.0005049705505371094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.2662813663482666s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.020888328552246094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.0007135868072509766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.00017881393432617188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cmo took 2.772987127304077s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.0005662441253662109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.2782611846923828s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.02150440216064453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.0007698535919189453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.0002295970916748047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cno took 2.7976200580596924s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Wheat trait took 6.222724914550781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Wheat trait took 0.0005757808685302734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Wheat trait took 0.2633945941925049s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Wheat trait took 0.02109217643737793s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Wheat trait took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Wheat trait took 0.0007808208465576172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Wheat trait took 6.270408630371094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Wheat trait took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-co_wheat took 2.82307767868042s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cognitive Atlas took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cognitive Atlas took 0.0005137920379638672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cognitive Atlas took 0.2997875213623047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cognitive Atlas took 0.020969629287719727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cognitive Atlas took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cognitive Atlas took 0.0007309913635253906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cognitive Atlas took 0.0003561973571777344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cognitive Atlas took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cogat took 2.7902324199676514s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.0005288124084472656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.29395294189453125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.021050214767456055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.0007600784301757812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.0007941722869873047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cogpo took 2.7299232482910156s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Current Procedural Terminology took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0004932880401611328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.267775297164917s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.021418094635009766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Current Procedural Terminology took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0008800029754638672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0004951953887939453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Current Procedural Terminology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cpt took 2.794434070587158s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.0005400180816650391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.3401191234588623s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.023153066635131836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 1.4781951904296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.0009691715240478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.0020606517791748047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-csp took 3.2360787391662598s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for COSTART took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for COSTART took 0.0008685588836669922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for COSTART took 0.2800924777984619s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for COSTART took 0.025560617446899414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for COSTART took 1.7642974853515625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for COSTART took 0.0012657642364501953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for COSTART took 0.0014431476593017578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for COSTART took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cst took 2.80905818939209s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.0005576610565185547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.28031206130981445s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.024109601974487305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.001201629638671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.0007915496826171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ctcae took 2.7890191078186035s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.000591278076171875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.2970247268676758s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.02561330795288086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 1.7642974853515625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.001295328140258789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0008733272552490234s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ctx took 2.7284183502197266s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dendritic cell took 7.486343383789062e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dendritic cell took 0.0007269382476806641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dendritic cell took 0.2835392951965332s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dendritic cell took 0.02160191535949707s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dendritic cell took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dendritic cell took 0.0010759830474853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dendritic cell took 0.0003871917724609375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dendritic cell took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-dc_cl took 2.8403775691986084s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.0005223751068115234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.2811908721923828s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.020714998245239258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.0007252693176269531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 9.012222290039062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ddanat took 2.7911767959594727s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 8.749961853027344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.0005605220794677734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.2683675289154053s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.025424718856811523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 1.8358230590820312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.00128173828125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.0012061595916748047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ddi took 2.781249761581421s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Diagnostic Ontology took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.0007164478302001953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.2743065357208252s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.02320575714111328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Diagnostic Ontology took 1.811981201171875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.0013701915740966797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.00014781951904296875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Diagnostic Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-diagnosticont took 2.836653709411621s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.0005466938018798828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.28002166748046875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.021418333053588867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.0008606910705566406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.00019240379333496094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-dikb-evidence took 2.7345058917999268s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human disease ontology took 5.412101745605469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human disease ontology took 0.0005135536193847656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human disease ontology took 0.2803077697753906s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human disease ontology took 0.021442890167236328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human disease ontology took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human disease ontology took 0.0007543563842773438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human disease ontology took 0.0006432533264160156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human disease ontology took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-doid took 2.7460639476776123s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Electrocardiography Ontology took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.0005068778991699219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.2851083278656006s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.021715402603149414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Electrocardiography Ontology took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.0007479190826416016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.0008373260498046875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Electrocardiography Ontology took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ecg took 2.7474610805511475s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Evidence codes took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Evidence codes took 0.0011022090911865234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Evidence codes took 0.2970302104949951s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Evidence codes took 0.02114105224609375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Evidence codes took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Evidence codes took 0.0007612705230712891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Evidence codes took 3.600120544433594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Evidence codes took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-eco took 2.796969413757324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Experimental Factor Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.0006234645843505859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.3301658630371094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.021093368530273438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Experimental Factor Ontology took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.0007598400115966797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.0017867088317871094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Experimental Factor Ontology took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-efo took 3.2035818099975586s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 5.7697296142578125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0006535053253173828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.2672090530395508s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.020889997482299805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0007297992706298828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0011980533599853516s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehda took 2.706719398498535s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 7.772445678710938e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0006215572357177734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.27874255180358887s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.02097797393798828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0007765293121337891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0007905960083007812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehdaa took 2.773561477661133s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0005328655242919922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.2818436622619629s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.020926952362060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0007600784301757812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0005500316619873047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehdaa2 took 2.7567617893218994s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.0012292861938476562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.29610228538513184s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.021955013275146484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.0010159015655517578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 5.5789947509765625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-emap took 2.7877750396728516s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Environment Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Environment Ontology took 0.0006082057952880859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Environment Ontology took 0.28012537956237793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Environment Ontology took 0.021707773208618164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Environment Ontology took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Environment Ontology took 0.000743865966796875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Environment Ontology took 0.00052642822265625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Environment Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-envo took 2.8140811920166016s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant environmental conditions took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant environmental conditions took 0.0006086826324462891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant environmental conditions took 0.28169870376586914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant environmental conditions took 0.02166438102722168s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant environmental conditions took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant environmental conditions took 0.0009484291076660156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant environmental conditions took 0.0003800392150878906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant environmental conditions took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-eo took 2.7356531620025635s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.00060272216796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.2952451705932617s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.020930051803588867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.0007839202880859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.0012404918670654297s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ep took 2.7652721405029297s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Epilepsy took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Epilepsy took 0.0005505084991455078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Epilepsy took 0.27942323684692383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Epilepsy took 0.0213925838470459s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Epilepsy took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Epilepsy took 0.0008578300476074219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Epilepsy took 0.00016927719116210938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Epilepsy took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-epileponto took 2.7345244884490967s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for eagle-i research resource ontology took 4.792213439941406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.0006306171417236328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.28226304054260254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.021509408950805664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for eagle-i research resource ontology took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.0009062290191650391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.0013413429260253906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for eagle-i research resource ontology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ero took 2.789116144180298s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0005991458892822266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.2784442901611328s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.024477243423461914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 2.0503997802734375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0016105175018310547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0016560554504394531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ev took 2.837573289871216s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ExO took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ExO took 0.0007157325744628906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ExO took 0.27930617332458496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ExO took 0.021421432495117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ExO took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ExO took 0.00077056884765625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ExO took 0.000293731689453125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ExO took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-exo took 2.753957509994507s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fungal gross anatomy took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.0010919570922851562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.2769045829772949s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.02100229263305664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fungal gross anatomy took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.0008766651153564453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.00013303756713867188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fungal gross anatomy took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fao took 2.7758843898773193s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biological imaging methods took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biological imaging methods took 0.0005643367767333984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biological imaging methods took 0.2826344966888428s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biological imaging methods took 0.02112102508544922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biological imaging methods took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biological imaging methods took 0.0007326602935791016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biological imaging methods took 0.00021409988403320312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biological imaging methods took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbbi took 2.8072097301483154s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Drosophila gross anatomy took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.0004761219024658203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.2808248996734619s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.020990848541259766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Drosophila gross anatomy took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.0007965564727783203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.0007588863372802734s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Drosophila gross anatomy took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbbt took 2.7966699600219727s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.0005269050598144531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.282132625579834s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.021152496337890625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.0009565353393554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.0004954338073730469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbcv took 2.7352797985076904s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Drosophila development took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Drosophila development took 0.0008585453033447266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Drosophila development took 0.2674429416656494s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Drosophila development took 0.026401281356811523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Drosophila development took 2.5033950805664062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Drosophila development took 0.0012478828430175781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Drosophila development took 7.009506225585938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Drosophila development took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbdv took 2.7851617336273193s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fly taxonomy took 5.8650970458984375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fly taxonomy took 0.0005877017974853516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fly taxonomy took 0.2783803939819336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fly taxonomy took 0.02090620994567871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fly taxonomy took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fly taxonomy took 0.0008134841918945312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fly taxonomy took 0.0004391670227050781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fly taxonomy took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbsp took 2.848820209503174s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 6.508827209472656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0005702972412109375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.28344058990478516s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.029130220413208008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 1.7881393432617188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0014109611511230469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0003066062927246094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fda-meddevice took 2.7327184677124023s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Family Health History Ontology took 9.465217590332031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Family Health History Ontology took 0.0010461807250976562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Family Health History Ontology took 0.28449559211730957s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Family Health History Ontology took 0.022601842880249023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Family Health History Ontology took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Family Health History Ontology took 0.0009524822235107422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Family Health History Ontology took 0.0005643367767333984s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Family Health History Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fhho took 2.6985015869140625s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Influenza Ontology took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Influenza Ontology took 0.0005755424499511719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Influenza Ontology took 0.26839399337768555s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Influenza Ontology took 0.021199941635131836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Influenza Ontology took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Influenza Ontology took 0.0007970333099365234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Influenza Ontology took 0.0011529922485351562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Influenza Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-flu took 2.7394638061523438s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 7.081031799316406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.0006368160247802734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.2816629409790039s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.022574186325073242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.0010030269622802734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.00010228157043457031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fma took 2.802272319793701s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 4.9591064453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.0005402565002441406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.27819180488586426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.020693540573120117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.0008599758148193359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.0001442432403564453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fypo took 2.7584149837493896s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for GeoSpecies Ontology took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.0004930496215820312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.2759988307952881s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.021196842193603516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for GeoSpecies Ontology took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.0007467269897460938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for GeoSpecies Ontology took 9.34600830078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for GeoSpecies Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-geospecies took 2.7934141159057617s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for General Formal Ontology took 4.696846008300781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for General Formal Ontology took 0.0006036758422851562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for General Formal Ontology took 0.26735925674438477s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for General Formal Ontology took 0.02156233787536621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for General Formal Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for General Formal Ontology took 0.0007381439208984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for General Formal Ontology took 0.0001704692840576172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for General Formal Ontology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gfo took 2.7102715969085693s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0005605220794677734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.2779383659362793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.020888328552246094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0007526874542236328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0006248950958251953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gfo-bio took 2.721252918243408s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Ontology Extension took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.000274658203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.28006768226623535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.021114587783813477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Ontology Extension took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0007336139678955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0008780956268310547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Ontology Extension took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-go_x1 took 2.841723680496216s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Ontology took 0.0006878376007080078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Ontology took 0.2806539535522461s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Ontology took 0.021564483642578125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Ontology took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Ontology took 0.0010044574737548828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Ontology took 0.0010111331939697266s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Ontology took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-go_x2 took 2.857827663421631s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cereal Plant Development took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cereal Plant Development took 0.0005540847778320312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cereal Plant Development took 0.29448413848876953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cereal Plant Development took 0.024188995361328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cereal Plant Development took 1.7881393432617188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cereal Plant Development took 0.0012395381927490234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cereal Plant Development took 6.890296936035156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cereal Plant Development took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro took 2.8155479431152344s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.0006377696990966797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.2861204147338867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.024413585662841797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 1.6689300537109375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.0007536411285400391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.0005366802215576172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro_x1 took 2.822695732116699s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 6.461143493652344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0006456375122070312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.283001184463501s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.021223068237304688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Regulation Ontology took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007171630859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0008394718170166016s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Regulation Ontology took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro_x2 took 2.810885190963745s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 5.1021575927734375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0006656646728515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.2854025363922119s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.02878713607788086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 3.337860107421875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0014836788177490234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.000797271728515625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hao took 2.7631304264068604s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HCPCS took 4.792213439941406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HCPCS took 0.0005700588226318359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HCPCS took 0.2792820930480957s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HCPCS took 0.026312828063964844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HCPCS took 2.1696090698242188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HCPCS took 0.0018343925476074219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HCPCS took 0.00035858154296875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HCPCS took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hcpcs took 2.775236129760742s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Health Level Seven took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Health Level Seven took 0.0005850791931152344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Health Level Seven took 0.2862577438354492s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Health Level Seven took 0.02181696891784668s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Health Level Seven took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Health Level Seven took 0.0007390975952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Health Level Seven took 0.0014257431030273438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Health Level Seven took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hl7 took 2.828321933746338s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.000568389892578125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.2864255905151367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.029424428939819336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 6.747245788574219e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.002074003219604492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.0005326271057128906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hlth_indics took 2.872803211212158s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.0005230903625488281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.3045165538787842s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.021013736724853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.000762939453125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 3.647804260253906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hom took 2.8314568996429443s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HOM-HARVARD took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HOM-HARVARD took 0.0006043910980224609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HOM-HARVARD took 0.2834789752960205s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HOM-HARVARD took 0.021725893020629883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HOM-HARVARD took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HOM-HARVARD took 0.0009026527404785156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HOM-HARVARD took 3.790855407714844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HOM-HARVARD took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hom_harvard took 2.78261399269104s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human Phenotype Ontology took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0005269050598144531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.26359009742736816s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.021574974060058594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human Phenotype Ontology took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0013260841369628906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0010385513305664062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human Phenotype Ontology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hp_x1 took 2.9054782390594482s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 8.106231689453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.0005655288696289062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.2810690402984619s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.020885944366455078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.0007388591766357422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.0011072158813476562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hpio took 2.858121156692505s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HUGO took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HUGO took 0.0005280971527099609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HUGO took 0.2826042175292969s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HUGO took 0.020886659622192383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HUGO took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HUGO took 0.0008115768432617188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HUGO took 9.274482727050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HUGO took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hugo took 2.7195792198181152s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Information Artifact Ontology took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.0008296966552734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.2803947925567627s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.020880699157714844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Information Artifact Ontology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.0007812976837158203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.0006959438323974609s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Information Artifact Ontology took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-iao took 2.831261157989502s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD10 took 7.510185241699219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD10 took 0.0004811286926269531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD10 took 0.2638587951660156s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD10 took 0.020961999893188477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD10 took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD10 took 0.0007708072662353516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD10 took 0.0008597373962402344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD10 took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10 took 2.765679359436035s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD10CM took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD10CM took 0.0005283355712890625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD10CM took 0.27820611000061035s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD10CM took 0.020742177963256836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD10CM took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD10CM took 0.0008130073547363281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD10CM took 0.0006787776947021484s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD10CM took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10cm took 2.7655415534973145s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD-10-PCS took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD-10-PCS took 0.0005471706390380859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD-10-PCS took 0.2783327102661133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD-10-PCS took 0.02088642120361328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD-10-PCS took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD-10-PCS took 0.0007390975952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD-10-PCS took 0.0001537799835205078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD-10-PCS took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10pcs took 2.729736566543579s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Diseases took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0004973411560058594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Diseases took 0.27875423431396484s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Diseases took 0.020922183990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Diseases took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0007405281066894531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0006592273712158203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Diseases took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd9cm took 2.703598976135254s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0005359649658203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.27869629859924316s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.020509719848632812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0007352828979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0004639625549316406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icf_x1 took 2.834221363067627s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.00047588348388671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.269606351852417s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.020556926727294922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0007646083831787109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0012803077697753906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icnp took 2.7457644939422607s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Primary Care took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.0006964206695556641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.30021023750305176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.021461963653564453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Primary Care took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.0008678436279296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.0004894733428955078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Primary Care took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icpc took 2.890655040740967s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICPC-2 PLUS took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.00047707557678222656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.2815573215484619s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.020774364471435547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICPC-2 PLUS took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0007312297821044922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0008790493011474609s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICPC-2 PLUS took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icpc2p took 2.7228434085845947s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICPS Network took 7.534027099609375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICPS Network took 0.0005254745483398438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICPS Network took 0.2814323902130127s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICPS Network took 0.021142244338989258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICPS Network took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICPS Network took 0.0007500648498535156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICPS Network took 0.000217437744140625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICPS Network took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icps took 2.85158634185791s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Infectious Disease Ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0005121231079101562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.2925264835357666s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.020578384399414062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Infectious Disease Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0007412433624267578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0008742809295654297s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Infectious Disease Ontology took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ido took 2.7733399868011475s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brucellosis Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0004978179931640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.2777566909790039s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.020587444305419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brucellosis Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0007712841033935547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0011494159698486328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brucellosis Ontology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-idobru took 2.75244402885437s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Malaria Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Malaria Ontology took 0.0005075931549072266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Malaria Ontology took 0.2815868854522705s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Malaria Ontology took 0.02046799659729004s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Malaria Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Malaria Ontology took 0.0007808208465576172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Malaria Ontology took 0.0013186931610107422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Malaria Ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-idomal took 2.803365707397461s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.0004718303680419922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.28409361839294434s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.020627975463867188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.0007622241973876953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.0003180503845214844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-iev took 2.787018060684204s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 7.510185241699219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.0004975795745849609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.2979435920715332s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.020581722259521484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.0007581710815429688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.00015473365783691406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-imgt took 2.7531373500823975s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0005395412445068359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.300518274307251s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.02058863639831543s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0007395744323730469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0005476474761962891s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-imr took 2.8059401512145996s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Interaction Network Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0005214214324951172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.28033924102783203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.020665407180786133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Interaction Network Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0007810592651367188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0007991790771484375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Interaction Network Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ino took 2.7684316635131836s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Hewan Invertebrata took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.0004851818084716797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.27744174003601074s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.020445823669433594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Hewan Invertebrata took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.0007472038269042969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Hewan Invertebrata took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Hewan Invertebrata took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-invertebrata took 2.777803897857666s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for IxnO took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for IxnO took 0.0005249977111816406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for IxnO took 0.27770161628723145s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for IxnO took 0.02057170867919922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for IxnO took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for IxnO took 0.0007236003875732422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for IxnO took 0.0001900196075439453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for IxnO took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ixno took 2.7729997634887695s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SysMO-JERM took 4.839897155761719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SysMO-JERM took 0.0005280971527099609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SysMO-JERM took 0.29389262199401855s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SysMO-JERM took 0.020739316940307617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SysMO-JERM took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SysMO-JERM took 0.0007658004760742188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SysMO-JERM took 0.0004191398620605469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SysMO-JERM took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-jerm took 2.765094041824341s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.0004987716674804688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.279050350189209s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.02055501937866211s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.0007524490356445312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-kisao took 2.777369737625122s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Loggerhead nesting took 4.8160552978515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Loggerhead nesting took 0.0005125999450683594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Loggerhead nesting took 0.297440767288208s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Loggerhead nesting took 0.020395517349243164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Loggerhead nesting took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Loggerhead nesting took 0.0007059574127197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Loggerhead nesting took 0.00019860267639160156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Loggerhead nesting took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lhn took 2.8122568130493164s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Lipid Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Lipid Ontology took 0.0005288124084472656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Lipid Ontology took 0.2788708209991455s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Lipid Ontology took 0.020307302474975586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Lipid Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Lipid Ontology took 0.0007431507110595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Lipid Ontology took 0.0002129077911376953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Lipid Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lipro took 2.7760214805603027s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0005486011505126953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.3288414478302002s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.02028036117553711s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0007224082946777344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0019006729125976562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lnc took 3.249555826187134s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 5.173683166503906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.000492095947265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.2766299247741699s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.020307064056396484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.0009474754333496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.0007727146148681641s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ma took 2.703160047531128s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Multiple alignment took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Multiple alignment took 0.0005559921264648438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Multiple alignment took 0.2640492916107178s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Multiple alignment took 0.02027606964111328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Multiple alignment took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Multiple alignment took 0.0007493495941162109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Multiple alignment took 0.00020456314086914062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Multiple alignment took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mao took 2.750216245651245s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Minimal anatomical terminology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0005290508270263672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.2843337059020996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.020704984664916992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Minimal anatomical terminology took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0011260509490966797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.000797271728515625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Minimal anatomical terminology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mat took 2.7871181964874268s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Breast tissue cell lines took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.0005958080291748047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.282562255859375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.02031683921813965s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Breast tissue cell lines took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.0008118152618408203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.0004546642303466797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Breast tissue cell lines took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mcbcc took 2.806654691696167s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell line ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell line ontology took 0.0005869865417480469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell line ontology took 0.26922607421875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell line ontology took 0.02030801773071289s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell line ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell line ontology took 0.000728607177734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell line ontology took 0.0007512569427490234s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell line ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mccl took 2.8064067363739014s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell line ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell line ontology took 0.0005919933319091797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell line ontology took 0.27742433547973633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell line ontology took 0.02067089080810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell line ontology took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell line ontology took 0.0007922649383544922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell line ontology took 0.0014843940734863281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell line ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mccl_x1 took 2.7703468799591064s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.0005314350128173828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.2821834087371826s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.021909713745117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.0007500648498535156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.00023865699768066406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mcv took 2.7919816970825195s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Master Drug Data Base took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Master Drug Data Base took 0.0005681514739990234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Master Drug Data Base took 0.27814722061157227s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Master Drug Data Base took 0.024030685424804688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Master Drug Data Base took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Master Drug Data Base took 0.0010657310485839844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Master Drug Data Base took 0.00021529197692871094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Master Drug Data Base took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mddb took 2.7120957374572754s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MedDRA took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MedDRA took 0.0006253719329833984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MedDRA took 0.2698194980621338s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MedDRA took 0.020789146423339844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MedDRA took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MedDRA took 0.0007174015045166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MedDRA took 0.0012059211730957031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MedDRA took 2.193450927734375e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mdr took 2.7369298934936523s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0005652904510498047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.27884912490844727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.02047562599182129s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0007152557373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0009074211120605469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-medlineplus took 2.742478370666504s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MeGO took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MeGO took 0.0006170272827148438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MeGO took 0.28081440925598145s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MeGO took 0.020470142364501953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MeGO took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MeGO took 0.0007340908050537109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MeGO took 0.00015211105346679688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MeGO took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mego took 2.771216630935669s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0005862712860107422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.34742140769958496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.02030158042907715s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0007226467132568359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0018177032470703125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mesh-owl took 3.342593193054199s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mental Functioning Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.0004711151123046875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.29919862747192383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.020331144332885742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mental Functioning Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.0007462501525878906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.0006411075592041016s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mental Functioning Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mf took 2.785698890686035s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0004966259002685547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.2783620357513428s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.02095174789428711s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0007352828979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0005872249603271484s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mfo took 2.7437050342559814s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Emotion Ontology took 8.082389831542969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Emotion Ontology took 0.0005614757537841797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Emotion Ontology took 0.26627516746520996s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Emotion Ontology took 0.023630857467651367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Emotion Ontology took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Emotion Ontology took 0.0014336109161376953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Emotion Ontology took 0.0009710788726806641s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Emotion Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mfoem took 2.7960867881774902s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.0001354217529296875s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.0005276203155517578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.28360486030578613s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.02051711082458496s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.0007536411285400391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.00011229515075683594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mhc took 2.780306339263916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Protein-protein interaction took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0004794597625732422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Protein-protein interaction took 0.2812166213989258s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Protein-protein interaction took 0.02050304412841797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Protein-protein interaction took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0007288455963134766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0007023811340332031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Protein-protein interaction took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mi took 2.7683942317962646s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0005319118499755859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.3043060302734375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.021422624588012695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0008738040924072266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0008971691131591797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-miro took 2.828972101211548s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Measurement Method Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.0006978511810302734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.29282402992248535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.02119588851928711s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Measurement Method Ontology took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.0008711814880371094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.00016808509826660156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Measurement Method Ontology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mmo took 2.823138475418091s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MGED Ontology took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MGED Ontology took 0.0005712509155273438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MGED Ontology took 0.27454304695129395s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MGED Ontology took 0.025841712951660156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MGED Ontology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MGED Ontology took 0.0011036396026611328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MGED Ontology took 0.0004892349243164062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MGED Ontology took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mo took 2.8218138217926025s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Protein modification took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Protein modification took 0.0005555152893066406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Protein modification took 0.28289365768432617s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Protein modification took 0.022524595260620117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Protein modification took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Protein modification took 0.0013484954833984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Protein modification took 0.00042176246643066406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Protein modification took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mod took 2.8398115634918213s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mammalian phenotype took 7.605552673339844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0005412101745605469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mammalian phenotype took 0.2931852340698242s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mammalian phenotype took 0.021565914154052734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mammalian phenotype took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0009961128234863281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0007874965667724609s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mammalian phenotype took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mp took 2.81927752494812s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse pathology took 4.9591064453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse pathology took 0.0006241798400878906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse pathology took 0.28279876708984375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse pathology took 0.020995616912841797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse pathology took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse pathology took 0.0007727146148681641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse pathology took 0.0005300045013427734s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse pathology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mpath took 2.78955340385437s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mass spectrometry took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mass spectrometry took 0.0006291866302490234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mass spectrometry took 0.28589606285095215s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mass spectrometry took 0.020628929138183594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mass spectrometry took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mass spectrometry took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mass spectrometry took 0.00037169456481933594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mass spectrometry took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ms took 2.778656005859375s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Medical Subject Headings took 7.867813110351562e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0005142688751220703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Medical Subject Headings took 0.33642005920410156s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Medical Subject Headings took 0.02144646644592285s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Medical Subject Headings took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0008854866027832031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Medical Subject Headings took 0.002047300338745117s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Medical Subject Headings took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-msh took 3.3253471851348877s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.0006556510925292969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.2688734531402588s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.021509885787963867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.000926971435546875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.0002281665802001953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mthch took 2.8417158126831055s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Natural Products Ontology took 5.650520324707031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0005428791046142578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Natural Products Ontology took 0.30385804176330566s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Natural Products Ontology took 0.020986080169677734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Natural Products Ontology took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0009467601776123047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0009381771087646484s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Natural Products Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-natpro took 2.8215694427490234s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NCBI organismal classification took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NCBI organismal classification took 0.0004980564117431641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NCBI organismal classification took 0.28212976455688477s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NCBI organismal classification took 0.0277254581451416s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NCBI organismal classification took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NCBI organismal classification took 0.0015535354614257812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NCBI organismal classification took 0.0009984970092773438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NCBI organismal classification took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ncbitaxon took 2.8360815048217773s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NCI Thesaurus took 7.390975952148438e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NCI Thesaurus took 0.0006115436553955078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NCI Thesaurus took 0.326831579208374s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NCI Thesaurus took 0.02292466163635254s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NCI Thesaurus took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NCI Thesaurus took 0.0008652210235595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NCI Thesaurus took 0.002156972885131836s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NCI Thesaurus took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ncit took 3.244769811630249s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for National Drug Data File took 5.793571472167969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for National Drug Data File took 0.0005247592926025391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for National Drug Data File took 0.2600870132446289s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for National Drug Data File took 0.020739316940307617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for National Drug Data File took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for National Drug Data File took 0.0009815692901611328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for National Drug Data File took 0.0007185935974121094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for National Drug Data File took 9.775161743164062e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nddf took 2.6602396965026855s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for National Drug File took 5.4836273193359375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for National Drug File took 0.0006330013275146484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for National Drug File took 0.27512621879577637s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for National Drug File took 0.02084946632385254s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for National Drug File took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for National Drug File took 0.0007331371307373047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for National Drug File took 0.0012748241424560547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for National Drug File took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ndfrt took 2.6949431896209717s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.0005064010620117188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.28167057037353516s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.021120071411132812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.0007293224334716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.0013363361358642578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nemo_x1 took 2.837681770324707s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0003914833068847656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.2657449245452881s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.02065873146057129s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0007405281066894531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0006937980651855469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-neomark took 2.792572259902954s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.0007627010345458984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.2846028804779053s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.021228790283203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.0009055137634277344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.00014853477478027344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-neomarkontology took 2.8416085243225098s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIFSTD took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIFSTD took 0.0005793571472167969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIFSTD took 0.32822751998901367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIFSTD took 0.020386457443237305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIFSTD took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIFSTD took 0.0007777214050292969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIFSTD took 0.001939535140991211s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIFSTD took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif took 3.2174036502838135s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIF Cell took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIF Cell took 0.00054931640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIF Cell took 0.2845423221588135s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIF Cell took 0.021381616592407227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIF Cell took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIF Cell took 0.0007557868957519531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIF Cell took 0.0014126300811767578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIF Cell took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif_cell took 2.83962082862854s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIF Dysfunction took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIF Dysfunction took 0.000553131103515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIF Dysfunction took 0.27957582473754883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIF Dysfunction took 0.020923137664794922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIF Dysfunction took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIF Dysfunction took 0.0008096694946289062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIF Dysfunction took 0.001489400863647461s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIF Dysfunction took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif_dysfunction took 2.7916526794433594s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0004966259002685547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.2831230163574219s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.020908117294311523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0008618831634521484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0006558895111083984s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nigo took 2.723498582839966s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0005097389221191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.2842550277709961s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.02053070068359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0007746219635009766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0007047653198242188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 1.811981201171875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nmr took 2.7697160243988037s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 5.507469177246094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.0005199909210205078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.2846252918243408s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.023319005966186523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.0008940696716308594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.00013446807861328125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nonrctontology took 2.779226064682007s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NanoParticle Ontology took 5.5789947509765625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.00048422813415527344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.27539634704589844s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.020593643188476562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NanoParticle Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.0007448196411132812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.0012025833129882812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NanoParticle Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-npo took 2.7179512977600098s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0006153583526611328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.28075528144836426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0209653377532959s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0007176399230957031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0007598400115966797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oae took 2.768129825592041s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0007889270782470703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.26593971252441406s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.02052927017211914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0007791519165039062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0014910697937011719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-obi took 2.798760175704956s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for OBOE took 6.437301635742188e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for OBOE took 0.0005340576171875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for OBOE took 0.2860851287841797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for OBOE took 0.021209239959716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for OBOE took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for OBOE took 0.00096893310546875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for OBOE took 0.00014209747314453125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for OBOE took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oboe took 2.7994260787963867s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for OBOE SBC took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for OBOE SBC took 0.0005216598510742188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for OBOE SBC took 0.2811703681945801s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for OBOE SBC took 0.02048778533935547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for OBOE SBC took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for OBOE SBC took 0.0007381439208984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for OBOE SBC took 0.000820159912109375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for OBOE SBC took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oboe-sbc took 2.795233964920044s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0005052089691162109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.27878475189208984s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.021434545516967773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0007390975952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.00067138671875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ocre took 2.8075320720672607s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.000583648681640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.2805485725402832s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.020603656768798828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0007565021514892578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0008933544158935547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-odgi took 2.773475170135498s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.00048232078552246094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.2794463634490967s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.021252870559692383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0007374286651611328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0009205341339111328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 9.775161743164062e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogi took 2.7468974590301514s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.0005564689636230469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.28206825256347656s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.020907163619995117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.0009245872497558594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.0003476142883300781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogmd took 2.8143270015716553s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for General Medical Science took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.00031447410583496094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.2973144054412842s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.024906158447265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for General Medical Science took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0011386871337890625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0008175373077392578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for General Medical Science took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogms took 2.8126282691955566s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.000484466552734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.2882823944091797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.020710229873657227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0007863044738769531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0011911392211914062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omim took 2.761608839035034s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.0008018016815185547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.28345704078674316s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.021763324737548828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 1.4781951904296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.0009679794311523438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.0004851818084716797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omit took 2.764414072036743s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.0002465248107910156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.278918981552124s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.026698589324951172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.0012822151184082031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.0008342266082763672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omrse took 2.500453472137451s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Data Mining took 4.673004150390625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.0005848407745361328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.2820761203765869s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.021907806396484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Data Mining took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.0010395050048828125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.0012145042419433594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Data Mining took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontodm took 2.7785534858703613s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.00044417381286621094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.2950742244720459s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.021426916122436523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.0007486343383789062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.0002894401550292969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontodt took 2.8231918811798096s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0006670951843261719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.2800319194793701s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.021836280822753906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0010814666748046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0007467269897460938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontoorpha took 2.775341033935547s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0005257129669189453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.27965831756591797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.02051854133605957s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0007414817810058594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0009522438049316406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-opl took 2.7870125770568848s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Phenotypic quality took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Phenotypic quality took 0.0005228519439697266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Phenotypic quality took 0.2767655849456787s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Phenotypic quality took 0.021036386489868164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Phenotypic quality took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Phenotypic quality took 0.0007557868957519531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Phenotypic quality took 0.000896453857421875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Phenotypic quality took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pato took 2.7422757148742676s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physician Data Query took 7.605552673339844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physician Data Query took 0.0004773139953613281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physician Data Query took 0.2721836566925049s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physician Data Query took 0.025210142135620117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physician Data Query took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physician Data Query took 0.00091552734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physician Data Query took 0.0009381771087646484s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physician Data Query took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pdq took 2.807342767715454s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Pediatric Terminology took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0004992485046386719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Pediatric Terminology took 0.27785682678222656s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Pediatric Terminology took 0.020510435104370117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Pediatric Terminology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0007383823394775391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0007953643798828125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Pediatric Terminology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pedterm took 2.692913055419922s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.0005359649658203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.2801036834716797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.020821332931518555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.0007262229919433594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.000209808349609375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-peo took 2.8096466064453125s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PHARE took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PHARE took 0.0004799365997314453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PHARE took 0.28525543212890625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PHARE took 0.02071380615234375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PHARE took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PHARE took 0.000751495361328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PHARE took 0.0006456375122070312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PHARE took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-phare took 2.780421257019043s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PKO_Re took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PKO_Re took 0.0005359649658203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PKO_Re took 0.2785804271697998s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PKO_Re took 0.020604848861694336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PKO_Re took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PKO_Re took 0.0007727146148681641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PKO_Re took 0.0001773834228515625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PKO_Re took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pko took 2.796433448791504s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PMA 2010 took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PMA 2010 took 0.0005238056182861328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PMA 2010 took 0.26479482650756836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PMA 2010 took 0.02647709846496582s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PMA 2010 took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PMA 2010 took 0.001409292221069336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PMA 2010 took 0.0012013912200927734s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PMA 2010 took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pma took 2.744030237197876s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.0005927085876464844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.2788662910461426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.020446300506591797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.0007531642913818359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.0001709461212158203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pmr took 2.8176522254943848s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Anatomy took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Anatomy took 0.0005412101745605469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Anatomy took 0.28101658821105957s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Anatomy took 0.020600080490112305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Anatomy took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Anatomy took 0.0007390975952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Anatomy took 0.00039386749267578125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Anatomy took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po took 2.7509653568267822s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 4.76837158203125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.0006101131439208984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.2821798324584961s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.02182769775390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.00104522705078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 9.393692016601562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po_x1 took 2.754775047302246s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Ontology took 0.0005280971527099609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Ontology took 0.26883578300476074s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Ontology took 0.020559310913085938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Ontology took 0.0007488727569580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Ontology took 0.00044465065002441406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po_x2 took 2.7543342113494873s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0005052089691162109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.2801241874694824s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.020672321319580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0007469654083251953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0006744861602783203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pr took 2.855929374694824s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Proteomics data and process provenance took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.0004987716674804688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.27893519401550293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.02598857879638672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Proteomics data and process provenance took 1.71661376953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.0014679431915283203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.0004603862762451172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Proteomics data and process provenance took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-propreo took 2.8136303424835205s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Pathway ontology took 5.030632019042969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Pathway ontology took 0.0007693767547607422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Pathway ontology took 0.2773747444152832s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Pathway ontology took 0.02055954933166504s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Pathway ontology took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Pathway ontology took 0.0010228157043457031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Pathway ontology took 0.00016951560974121094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Pathway ontology took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pw took 2.763265609741211s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.0004878044128417969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.2994842529296875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.020570755004882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.0007567405700683594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 3.314018249511719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-qibo took 2.707937479019165s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.00048828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.3304011821746826s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.02043604850769043s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.0007765293121337891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.0018117427825927734s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rcd took 3.23752760887146s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.0005064010620117188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.28435683250427246s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.02647995948791504s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.00072479248046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.000148773193359375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rctontology took 2.8177058696746826s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.0005362033843994141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.27300381660461426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.02174544334411621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.0007359981536865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.00010395050048828125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-repo took 2.753122091293335s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physico-chemical process took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physico-chemical process took 0.0005919933319091797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physico-chemical process took 0.29148244857788086s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physico-chemical process took 0.023537397384643555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physico-chemical process took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physico-chemical process took 0.0012238025665283203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physico-chemical process took 0.0002493858337402344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physico-chemical process took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rex took 2.8063197135925293s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RadLex took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RadLex took 0.0005156993865966797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RadLex took 0.2872450351715088s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RadLex took 0.02143096923828125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RadLex took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RadLex took 0.0007917881011962891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RadLex took 0.0016603469848632812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RadLex took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rid took 2.824326276779175s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RNA ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RNA ontology took 0.0004677772521972656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RNA ontology took 0.2807009220123291s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RNA ontology took 0.02043604850769043s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RNA ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RNA ontology took 0.0007381439208984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RNA ontology took 0.0005714893341064453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RNA ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rnao took 2.731832504272461s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Role Ontology took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Role Ontology took 0.0005147457122802734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Role Ontology took 0.2872343063354492s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Role Ontology took 0.020652055740356445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Role Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Role Ontology took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Role Ontology took 0.00019431114196777344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Role Ontology took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-roleo took 2.8741040229797363s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Rat Strain Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.0005037784576416016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.2755751609802246s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.020541667938232422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Rat Strain Ontology took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.0007686614990234375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.0001900196075439453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Rat Strain Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rs took 2.8002827167510986s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RxNORM took 4.792213439941406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RxNORM took 0.00039839744567871094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RxNORM took 0.2901577949523926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RxNORM took 0.020756006240844727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RxNORM took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RxNORM took 0.0007810592651367188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RxNORM took 0.0006816387176513672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RxNORM took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rxnorm took 2.8371267318725586s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 5.745887756347656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0004904270172119141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.28317737579345703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.02057623863220215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0008001327514648438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0011119842529296875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 9.775161743164062e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sao took 2.8248860836029053s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Systems Biology took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Systems Biology took 0.0005116462707519531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Systems Biology took 0.309067964553833s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Systems Biology took 0.020598649978637695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Systems Biology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Systems Biology took 0.0007371902465820312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Systems Biology took 0.0004677772521972656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Systems Biology took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sbo took 2.7963778972625732s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.0009245872497558594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.279865026473999s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.02058696746826172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.0007562637329101562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.00010609626770019531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sbro took 2.7441699504852295s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sleep Domain Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.0005156993865966797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.27457690238952637s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.020671844482421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sleep Domain Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.0007467269897460938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.001482248306274414s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sleep Domain Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sdo took 2.823465347290039s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sample processing and separation techniques took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.0004911422729492188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.2765676975250244s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.021801233291625977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sample processing and separation techniques took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.0013785362243652344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.00045180320739746094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sample processing and separation techniques took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sep took 2.746100425720215s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Student Health Record took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Student Health Record took 0.0004642009735107422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Student Health Record took 0.2797706127166748s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Student Health Record took 0.02059030532836914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Student Health Record took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Student Health Record took 0.00078582763671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Student Health Record took 0.0005269050598144531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Student Health Record took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-shr took 2.761683940887451s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0006601810455322266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.301713228225708s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.020560264587402344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0008325576782226562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0013659000396728516s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sio took 3.631838083267212s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Situation-Based Access Control took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.0004191398620605469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.26552653312683105s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.020852327346801758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Situation-Based Access Control took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.0008718967437744141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.000247955322265625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Situation-Based Access Control took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sitbac took 2.718522310256958s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.0005605220794677734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.3331766128540039s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.021049022674560547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.0008869171142578125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.0020940303802490234s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-snomedct took 3.201317310333252s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SNP-Ontology took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SNP-Ontology took 0.0003609657287597656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SNP-Ontology took 0.27878451347351074s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SNP-Ontology took 0.020675182342529297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SNP-Ontology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SNP-Ontology took 0.0007913112640380859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SNP-Ontology took 0.0007030963897705078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SNP-Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-snpo took 2.6571450233459473s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sequence types and features took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sequence types and features took 0.0005033016204833984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sequence types and features took 0.2974584102630615s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sequence types and features took 0.020473241806030273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sequence types and features took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sequence types and features took 0.0007390975952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sequence types and features took 0.0005791187286376953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sequence types and features took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-so_x1 took 2.731633424758911s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.00048804283142089844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.3289504051208496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.02091050148010254s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0007491111755371094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0016067028045654297s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sopharm took 3.224320888519287s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SoyOntology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SoyOntology took 0.0005097389221191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SoyOntology took 0.27947044372558594s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SoyOntology took 0.021368741989135742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SoyOntology took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SoyOntology took 0.0008113384246826172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SoyOntology took 0.00015115737915039062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SoyOntology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-soy took 2.8159306049346924s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Spider Ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Spider Ontology took 0.00028634071350097656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Spider Ontology took 0.27134013175964355s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Spider Ontology took 0.020336389541625977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Spider Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Spider Ontology took 0.0007219314575195312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Spider Ontology took 0.00033211708068847656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Spider Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-spd took 2.7008652687072754s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.000263214111328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.2689981460571289s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.020409107208251953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.0007193088531494141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.00027823448181152344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-spto took 2.688555955886841s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.0003209114074707031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.27081727981567383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.020294666290283203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.0007426738739013672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.0004448890686035156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sso took 2.708791494369507s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Software Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Software Ontology took 0.0003070831298828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Software Ontology took 0.26898884773254395s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Software Ontology took 0.020496129989624023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Software Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Software Ontology took 0.0007383823394775391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Software Ontology took 0.00041413307189941406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Software Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-swo took 2.7494759559631348s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Tick gross anatomy took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Tick gross anatomy took 0.0002856254577636719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Tick gross anatomy took 0.283217191696167s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Tick gross anatomy took 0.02053976058959961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Tick gross anatomy took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Tick gross anatomy took 0.0007359981536865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Tick gross anatomy took 0.0002529621124267578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Tick gross anatomy took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tads took 2.711939573287964s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.0006268024444580078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.27669620513916016s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.02046966552734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.0007991790771484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.0009517669677734375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tao took 2.7907052040100098s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.00026917457580566406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.2676248550415039s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.020379304885864258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.0007777214050292969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 9.274482727050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-taxrank took 2.6967785358428955s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.0005457401275634766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.2785787582397461s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.021395206451416016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.0009257793426513672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 8.96453857421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-teddy took 2.7116053104400635s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Time Event Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Time Event Ontology took 0.0002522468566894531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Time Event Ontology took 0.282301664352417s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Time Event Ontology took 0.020292043685913086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Time Event Ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Time Event Ontology took 0.0007703304290771484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Time Event Ontology took 0.0008203983306884766s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Time Event Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-teo took 2.7377710342407227s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mosquito gross anatomy took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0005159378051757812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.2835962772369385s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.020751237869262695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mosquito gross anatomy took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0007374286651611328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.00043082237243652344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mosquito gross anatomy took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tgma took 2.7286791801452637s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for thesaurus took 6.723403930664062e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for thesaurus took 0.0005469322204589844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for thesaurus took 0.27895069122314453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for thesaurus took 0.021088838577270508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for thesaurus took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for thesaurus took 0.0009698867797851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for thesaurus took 8.606910705566406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for thesaurus took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-thesaurus took 2.83876371383667s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 8.392333984375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.0005893707275390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.27698230743408203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.020989656448364258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.0008580684661865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.00039958953857421875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tm-signs-and-sympts took 2.7990036010742188s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Translational Medicine Ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0006406307220458984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.27790188789367676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.020565032958984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Translational Medicine Ontology took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0008642673492431641s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Translational Medicine Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tmo took 2.7574284076690674s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Trait Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.00044846534729003906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.2792360782623291s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.020719528198242188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Trait Ontology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.0007598400115966797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.0001628398895263672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Trait Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-to took 2.740337371826172s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for TOK_Ontology took 8.106231689453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for TOK_Ontology took 0.0004439353942871094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for TOK_Ontology took 0.2787439823150635s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for TOK_Ontology took 0.020668745040893555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for TOK_Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for TOK_Ontology took 0.0007760524749755859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for TOK_Ontology took 0.00018668174743652344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for TOK_Ontology took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tok took 2.825869560241699s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Teleost taxonomy took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Teleost taxonomy took 0.0005466938018798828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Teleost taxonomy took 0.27976155281066895s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Teleost taxonomy took 0.020840883255004883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Teleost taxonomy took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Teleost taxonomy took 0.0007364749908447266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Teleost taxonomy took 0.0001964569091796875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Teleost taxonomy took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tto took 2.7736732959747314s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Uber anatomy ontology took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.0005600452423095703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.29300808906555176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.020982742309570312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Uber anatomy ontology took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.0011756420135498047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.001209259033203125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Uber anatomy ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-uberon took 2.711700439453125s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Units Ontology took 6.413459777832031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Units Ontology took 0.001291036605834961s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Units Ontology took 0.2829551696777344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Units Ontology took 0.021482229232788086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Units Ontology took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Units Ontology took 0.0010616779327392578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Units Ontology took 0.0002727508544921875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Units Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-unitsontology took 2.761333465576172s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Units of measurement took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Units of measurement took 0.0005068778991699219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Units of measurement took 0.28273797035217285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Units of measurement took 0.022057771682739258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Units of measurement took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Units of measurement took 0.0013012886047363281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Units of measurement took 0.0003905296325683594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Units of measurement took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-uo took 2.8252665996551514s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for VANDF took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for VANDF took 0.0004668235778808594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for VANDF took 0.2807607650756836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for VANDF took 0.020624637603759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for VANDF took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for VANDF took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for VANDF took 0.0006802082061767578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for VANDF took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vandf took 2.7356836795806885s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.00011706352233886719s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.0006306171417236328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.29784655570983887s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.02153491973876953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.001012563705444336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.0005238056182861328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vao took 2.7945117950439453s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0004832744598388672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.28112101554870605s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.020842790603637695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0007817745208740234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0006971359252929688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vhog took 2.780609130859375s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for VIVO took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for VIVO took 0.0005049705505371094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for VIVO took 0.280320405960083s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for VIVO took 0.020552873611450195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for VIVO took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for VIVO took 0.0007348060607910156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for VIVO took 0.0003478527069091797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for VIVO took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vivo took 2.7805469036102295s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vaccine Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0006983280181884766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vaccine Ontology took 0.2708258628845215s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vaccine Ontology took 0.021954059600830078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vaccine Ontology took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0009522438049316406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0014111995697021484s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vaccine Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vo took 2.726642608642578s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.0005419254302978516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.26483678817749023s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.020490646362304688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.0007739067077636719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.00021219253540039062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vt took 2.7952966690063477s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans gross anatomy took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.00048470497131347656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.2805922031402588s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.020307540893554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans gross anatomy took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0007538795471191406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0005054473876953125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans gross anatomy took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbbt took 2.7197558879852295s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans development took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans development took 0.0005171298980712891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans development took 0.2797238826751709s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans development took 0.020499467849731445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans development took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans development took 0.0011260509490966797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans development took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans development took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbls took 2.749897003173828s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans phenotype took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans phenotype took 0.0004718303680419922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans phenotype took 0.2809574604034424s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans phenotype took 0.020228862762451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans phenotype took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans phenotype took 0.0007274150848388672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans phenotype took 8.630752563476562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans phenotype took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbphenotype took 2.7921862602233887s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 5.221366882324219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0004546642303466797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.2797060012817383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.02044844627380371s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0007214546203613281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0006015300750732422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-who took 2.7175214290618896s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Xenopus anatomy and development took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0005068778991699219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.28040003776550293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.02017521858215332s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Xenopus anatomy and development took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0007276535034179688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0006704330444335938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Xenopus anatomy and development took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-xao took 2.792975425720215s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.00046539306640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.29384565353393555s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.02032756805419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.00072479248046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.00022935867309570312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-xco took 2.820632219314575s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Yeast phenotypes took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Yeast phenotypes took 0.0004935264587402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Yeast phenotypes took 0.27959394454956055s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Yeast phenotypes took 0.020110607147216797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Yeast phenotypes took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Yeast phenotypes took 0.0007383823394775391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Yeast phenotypes took 0.0002682209014892578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Yeast phenotypes took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ypo took 2.7865099906921387s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 7.390975952148438e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0005331039428710938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.26786160469055176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.020277976989746094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0007655620574951172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-zfa took 2.8001019954681396s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.0006124973297119141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.2976348400115967s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.020348072052001953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.0007364749908447266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 3.7670135498046875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bioportal_link took 3.6429715156555176s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioSamples RDF took 0.473660945892334s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioSamples RDF took 0.0004353523254394531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioSamples RDF took 0.2952601909637451s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioSamples RDF took 0.02050948143005371s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioSamples RDF took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioSamples RDF took 0.0007669925689697266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioSamples RDF took 3.457069396972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioSamples RDF took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biosamples-rdf took 3.6592299938201904s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.5458252429962158s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.00022721290588378906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.2803030014038086s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.021359682083129883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.000978231430053711s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.0001366138458251953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bis-linked-data took 3.0643367767333984s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bitzi took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bitzi took 0.0002677440643310547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bitzi took 0.278700590133667s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bitzi took 0.02130866050720215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bitzi took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bitzi took 0.0008192062377929688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bitzi took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bitzi took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bitzi took 3.075186014175415s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BizkaiSense took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BizkaiSense took 0.00048065185546875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BizkaiSense took 0.2813394069671631s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BizkaiSense took 0.020608186721801758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BizkaiSense took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BizkaiSense took 0.0007352828979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BizkaiSense took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BizkaiSense took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bizkaisense took 3.0690784454345703s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for blabla.itemlist took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for blabla.itemlist took 0.0002346038818359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for blabla.itemlist took 0.2664794921875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for blabla.itemlist took 0.020800352096557617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for blabla.itemlist took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for blabla.itemlist took 0.0007977485656738281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for blabla.itemlist took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for blabla.itemlist took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for blabla-itemlist took 3.048314094543457s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for blabla.itemlist took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for blabla.itemlist took 0.00032138824462890625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for blabla.itemlist took 0.2841341495513916s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for blabla.itemlist took 0.02105093002319336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for blabla.itemlist took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for blabla.itemlist took 0.00095367431640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for blabla.itemlist took 3.647804260253906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for blabla.itemlist took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for blabla_itemlist took 3.14215087890625s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 8.463859558105469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.0005788803100585938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.29762887954711914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.020631074905395508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.0007205009460449219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 1.239776611328125e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bll-thesaurus took 3.839790105819702s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.536491870880127s
Availability | VoID file availability check for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.0006046295166015625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.2820565700531006s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.020416736602783203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.0007505416870117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 6.628036499023438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bluk-bnb took 11.855115175247192s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.2773873805999756s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.00031280517578125s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Thesaurus BNCF took 53.0895733833313s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.6886212825775146s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.644660472869873s
Interoperability | New terms check for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.536391258239746s
Versatility | Languages check for Thesaurus BNCF took 7.1388773918151855s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.8590512275695801s
Security | Check HTTPS for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.08466196060180664s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12401366233825684s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.13271307945251465s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1201772689819336s
License | MR license check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1186375617980957s
License | HR license check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.24838685989379883s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12691903114318848s
Understandability | Number of label check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.25205063819885254s
Understandability | URI regex check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.23894453048706055s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12441277503967285s
Verifiability | Authors check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.11524057388305664s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12403702735900879s
Performance | Throughput check for Thesaurus BNCF took 10.792303085327148s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Thesaurus BNCF took 6.937980651855469e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.13300514221191406s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1312255859375s
Interlinking | skos check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.17517399787902832s
Interlinking | skos check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.14641284942626953s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12901520729064941s
Currency | Creation date check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.2495419979095459s
Currency | Modification date check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.25869202613830566s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Thesaurus BNCF took 24.880350351333618s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.17800688743591309s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.1156919002532959s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.11560416221618652s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Thesaurus BNCF took 13.045307636260986s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.5043981075286865s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Thesaurus BNCF took 4.087510824203491s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.13540363311767578s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.857973575592041s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Thesaurus BNCF took 6.942166328430176s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Thesaurus BNCF took 9.64513897895813s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.63545560836792s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Thesaurus BNCF took 2.4086527824401855s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Thesaurus BNCF took 2.4303090572357178s
Security | Sign check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.12205672264099121s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Thesaurus BNCF took 21.909934997558594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.3455185890197754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.02033376693725586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.0007123947143554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Thesaurus BNCF took 7.772445678710938e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Thesaurus BNCF took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bncf-ns took 197.01684975624084s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.5527181625366211s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.0005719661712646484s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.139052391052246s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.6675934791564941s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 3.1921215057373047s
Interoperability | New terms check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 4.329254150390625s
Versatility | Languages check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 60.3076286315918s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.3794751167297363s
Security | Check HTTPS for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.43006324768066406s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3876817226409912s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.46705007553100586s
Availability | RDF dump link check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.4524669647216797s
License | MR license check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.583003044128418s
License | HR license check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 60.34331560134888s
Amount of data | Number of property check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3601841926574707s
Understandability | Number of label check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.8754749298095703s
Understandability | URI regex check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.7233552932739258s
Understandability | Vocabs check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.45867228507995605s
Verifiability | Authors check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3630185127258301s
Verifiability | Publishers check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.36477065086364746s
Performance | Throughput check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 10.893224716186523s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 7.128715515136719e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3422677516937256s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.39310765266418457s
Interlinking | skos check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.360248327255249s
Interlinking | skos check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3189857006072998s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.43439459800720215s
Currency | Creation date check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.696713924407959s
Currency | Modification date check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.35848140716552734s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 18.40849018096924s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.34978151321411133s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.36150169372558594s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3616809844970703s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.1136069297790527s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.023891210556030273s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.031946420669555664s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.332216739654541s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 13.432669878005981s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.4397611618041992s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.5105202198028564s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.5971143245697021s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 14.848330736160278s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.03118300437927246s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3985137939453125s
Security | Sign check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.33366990089416504s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 11.754818677902222s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.5006177425384521s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.02083611488342285s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.0007421970367431641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 9.5367431640625e-07s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bpr took 397.2428147792816s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brazilian Politicians took 5.555152893066406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brazilian Politicians took 0.0006284713745117188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brazilian Politicians took 0.3095269203186035s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brazilian Politicians took 0.020596027374267578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brazilian Politicians took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brazilian Politicians took 0.0007669925689697266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brazilian Politicians took 7.152557373046875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brazilian Politicians took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for brazilian-politicians took 3.9641828536987305s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BrazilianCities took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BrazilianCities took 0.000255584716796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BrazilianCities took 0.27724456787109375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BrazilianCities took 0.0211181640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BrazilianCities took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BrazilianCities took 0.0007278919219970703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BrazilianCities took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BrazilianCities took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for braziliancities took 3.4605071544647217s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bricklink took 1.507908821105957s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bricklink took 0.0008280277252197266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bricklink took 0.2810792922973633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bricklink took 0.020406484603881836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bricklink took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bricklink took 0.0007228851318359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bricklink took 6.890296936035156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bricklink took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bricklink took 10.574749231338501s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for British Museum Collection took 30.111107110977173s
Availability | VoID file availability check for British Museum Collection took 0.0006468296051025391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for British Museum Collection took 0.26996827125549316s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for British Museum Collection took 0.020067453384399414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for British Museum Collection took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for British Museum Collection took 0.0007479190826416016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for British Museum Collection took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for British Museum Collection took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for british-museum-collection took 73.14490342140198s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.0004661083221435547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.2781026363372803s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.02101612091064453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.0008480548858642578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for brown-corpus-in-rdf-nif took 3.482072114944458s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for French Plant Health Bulletins took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.0002963542938232422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.2824230194091797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.020473003387451172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for French Plant Health Bulletins took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for French Plant Health Bulletins took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for French Plant Health Bulletins took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bsv took 3.071218967437744s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 3.269449472427368s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.0006275177001953125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.28229570388793945s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.020426511764526367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.0007293224334716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bulgarian_admissions_to_correctional_facilities took 7.449791193008423s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bund Offener Haushalt took 5.841255187988281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.00021529197692871094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.2780568599700928s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.020704984664916992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bund Offener Haushalt took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.0007143020629882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bund Offener Haushalt took 3.24249267578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bund Offener Haushalt took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bund-offener-haushalt took 3.482182264328003s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.0004947185516357422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.26973414421081543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.020514965057373047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.0007460117340087891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bundestagnebeneinkuenfte took 3.0437252521514893s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for business.data.gov.uk took 0.38654112815856934s
Availability | VoID file availability check for business.data.gov.uk took 0.00048542022705078125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for business.data.gov.uk took 0.2930319309234619s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for business.data.gov.uk took 0.020140409469604492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for business.data.gov.uk took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for business.data.gov.uk took 0.0007278919219970703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for business.data.gov.uk took 5.221366882324219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for business.data.gov.uk took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for business-data-gov-uk took 3.0512547492980957s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.43999361991882324s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.00037288665771484375s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 2.264899253845215s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.5499794483184814s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4758491516113281s
Interoperability | New terms check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.8564276695251465s
Versatility | Languages check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 30.21849036216736s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.3608968257904053s
Security | Check HTTPS for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.33384203910827637s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.8350121974945068s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4891180992126465s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2745821475982666s
License | MR license check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2908594608306885s
License | HR license check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 20.879724502563477s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.34331226348876953s
Understandability | Number of label check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.5848851203918457s
Understandability | URI regex check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.6343076229095459s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.29162096977233887s
Verifiability | Authors check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.26134800910949707s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.36162662506103516s
Performance | Throughput check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 11.653337001800537s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 6.699562072753906e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.25683021545410156s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.278378963470459s
Interlinking | skos check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.42430949211120605s
Interlinking | skos check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2974052429199219s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2561371326446533s
Currency | Creation date check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.5435538291931152s
Currency | Modification date check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.572317361831665s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 2.093520402908325s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 2.384185791015625e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.27410149574279785s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.3525402545928955s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.39722585678100586s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.9388477802276611s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.03400754928588867s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.02810978889465332s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.3036222457885742s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.8838605880737305s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.3726658821105957s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.8795554637908936s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.344616413116455s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.9338369369506836s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.03626561164855957s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2844815254211426s
Security | Sign check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2934420108795166s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 834.933413028717s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.3278508186340332s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.0210113525390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.0007393360137939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.00010561943054199219s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for BVMC took 945.1474349498749s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.00026702880859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.2824666500091553s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.02003645896911621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.0007147789001464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cabbage took 3.6102397441864014s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for cablegate took 1.909705638885498s
Availability | VoID file availability check for cablegate took 0.0006096363067626953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for cablegate took 0.2710442543029785s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for cablegate took 0.020337581634521484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for cablegate took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for cablegate took 0.0007207393646240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for cablegate took 7.009506225585938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for cablegate took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cablegate took 16.99484372138977s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Calames took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Calames took 0.0005745887756347656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Calames took 0.2857069969177246s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Calames took 0.02038264274597168s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Calames took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Calames took 0.0007243156433105469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Calames took 3.2901763916015625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Calames took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for calames took 4.720925331115723s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.43445348739624023s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.0002675056457519531s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for CaLiGraph took 8.977931499481201s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for CaLiGraph took 1.3011555671691895s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for CaLiGraph took 11.772142171859741s
Interoperability | New terms check for CaLiGraph took 6.581875562667847s
Versatility | Languages check for CaLiGraph took 60.28974890708923s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for CaLiGraph took 0.25554990768432617s
Security | Check HTTPS for CaLiGraph took 0.1361081600189209s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for CaLiGraph took 0.30616068840026855s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for CaLiGraph took 0.30738091468811035s
Availability | RDF dump link check for CaLiGraph took 0.2745175361633301s
License | MR license check for CaLiGraph took 0.4039602279663086s
License | HR license check for CaLiGraph took 60.30641436576843s
Amount of data | Number of property check for CaLiGraph took 0.260958194732666s
Understandability | Number of label check for CaLiGraph took 3.260944366455078s
Understandability | URI regex check for CaLiGraph took 0.5787608623504639s
Understandability | Vocabs check for CaLiGraph took 0.30684781074523926s
Verifiability | Authors check for CaLiGraph took 0.2806878089904785s
Verifiability | Publishers check for CaLiGraph took 0.31345081329345703s
Performance | Throughput check for CaLiGraph took 11.367526769638062s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for CaLiGraph took 0.01558828353881836s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for CaLiGraph took 0.2746715545654297s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for CaLiGraph took 0.6679081916809082s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.4179954528808594s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.22461271286010742s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for CaLiGraph took 0.32535815238952637s
Currency | Creation date check for CaLiGraph took 0.5465216636657715s
Currency | Modification date check for CaLiGraph took 0.5125000476837158s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for CaLiGraph took 65.44479489326477s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for CaLiGraph took 3.5762786865234375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for CaLiGraph took 0.5425317287445068s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 0.29316258430480957s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 0.29276323318481445s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for CaLiGraph took 3.1455061435699463s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for CaLiGraph took 0.02657771110534668s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for CaLiGraph took 0.04934120178222656s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for CaLiGraph took 0.25522470474243164s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for CaLiGraph took 66.0135407447815s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for CaLiGraph took 1.5954678058624268s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for CaLiGraph took 5.820702075958252s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for CaLiGraph took 1.3108983039855957s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for CaLiGraph took 61.63694429397583s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.036660194396972656s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 2.294746160507202s
Security | Sign check for CaLiGraph took 0.42166566848754883s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for CaLiGraph took 11.441531419754028s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CaLiGraph took 0.8153209686279297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CaLiGraph took 0.022035837173461914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CaLiGraph took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CaLiGraph took 0.0007851123809814453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CaLiGraph took 4.744529724121094e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for CaLiGraph took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CaLiGraph took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CaLiGraph took 1733.6355485916138s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CaLiGraph took 20.451311826705933s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.0006837844848632812s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for CaLiGraph took 54.110445737838745s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for CaLiGraph took 82.59860730171204s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for CaLiGraph took 24.571573734283447s
Interoperability | New terms check for CaLiGraph took 18.135995388031006s
Versatility | Languages check for CaLiGraph took 84.47169589996338s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for CaLiGraph took 10.334128379821777s
Security | Check HTTPS for CaLiGraph took 9.072229146957397s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for CaLiGraph took 10.02265214920044s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for CaLiGraph took 8.08083200454712s
Availability | RDF dump link check for CaLiGraph took 2.4468982219696045s
License | MR license check for CaLiGraph took 12.191182851791382s
License | HR license check for CaLiGraph took 69.01219582557678s
Amount of data | Number of property check for CaLiGraph took 7.568095684051514s
Understandability | Number of label check for CaLiGraph took 20.469669818878174s
Understandability | URI regex check for CaLiGraph took 26.67143964767456s
Understandability | Vocabs check for CaLiGraph took 12.250935316085815s
Verifiability | Authors check for CaLiGraph took 19.954550981521606s
Verifiability | Publishers check for CaLiGraph took 18.353987455368042s
Performance | Throughput check for CaLiGraph took 167.88422513008118s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for CaLiGraph took 0.016750335693359375s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for CaLiGraph took 10.845462322235107s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for CaLiGraph took 14.707415342330933s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 24.67711114883423s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.3914813995361328s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for CaLiGraph took 0.2737691402435303s
Currency | Creation date check for CaLiGraph took 31.54472517967224s
Currency | Modification date check for CaLiGraph took 28.33992624282837s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for CaLiGraph took 75.42608046531677s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for CaLiGraph took 3.337860107421875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for CaLiGraph took 22.584884643554688s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 49.80725598335266s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 19.93219494819641s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for CaLiGraph took 39.22893190383911s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for CaLiGraph took 0.02730560302734375s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for CaLiGraph took 0.051785945892333984s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for CaLiGraph took 6.592639446258545s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for CaLiGraph took 94.4278953075409s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for CaLiGraph took 10.789705038070679s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for CaLiGraph took 24.033021926879883s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for CaLiGraph took 1.36061429977417s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for CaLiGraph took 86.36313152313232s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.029879331588745117s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 7.347963333129883s
Security | Sign check for CaLiGraph took 15.875781536102295s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for CaLiGraph took 11.50609540939331s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CaLiGraph took 0.5347867012023926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CaLiGraph took 0.021001815795898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CaLiGraph took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CaLiGraph took 0.0007312297821044922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CaLiGraph took 8.96453857421875e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for CaLiGraph took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CaLiGraph took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for caligraph took 4852.728640794754s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for can-link took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for can-link took 0.00027251243591308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for can-link took 0.2979736328125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for can-link took 0.021099328994750977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for can-link took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for can-link took 0.0007789134979248047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for can-link took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for can-link took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for can-link took 3.5682687759399414s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.07122039794921875s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.0004994869232177734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.2654085159301758s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.023435115814208984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.0012409687042236328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 4.673004150390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cap-italy-rdf took 2.712261915206909s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for person took 5.698204040527344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for person took 0.0002906322479248047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for person took 0.27967333793640137s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for person took 0.021718978881835938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for person took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for person took 0.00079345703125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for person took 3.790855407714844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for person took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for card took 2.542619466781616s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0007069110870361328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.2774620056152344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.02131032943725586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0007321834564208984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for catalan-eurowordnet-lemon-lexicon-3-0 took 3.125382900238037s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.0002377033233642578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.28017497062683105s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.020952939987182617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.0007731914520263672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 3.743171691894531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for catalogus-professorum-lipsiensis took 3.113553524017334s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.6719074249267578s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.00029087066650390625s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 133.58136105537415s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.184448480606079s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 9.243963479995728s
Interoperability | New terms check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 14.107526540756226s
Versatility | Languages check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 300.2665812969208s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 3.212160110473633s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.3098750114440918s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 11.509032487869263s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.33028483390808105s
License | MR license check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.6133384704589844s
License | HR license check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 300.2405335903168s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.3037536144256592s
Understandability | Number of label check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.4500367641448975s
Understandability | URI regex check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.8973150253295898s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.46917104721069336s
Verifiability | Authors check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.2383878231048584s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.2953829765319824s
Performance | Throughput check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 11.768782138824463s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 7.05718994140625e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.23304200172424316s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.2348639965057373s
Interlinking | skos check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.49271464347839355s
Interlinking | skos check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.4806492328643799s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 6.694875240325928s
Currency | Creation date check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.5687251091003418s
Currency | Modification date check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.29564857482910156s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 170.8683683872223s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.23343396186828613s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.375537633895874s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.37091565132141113s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 49.5213418006897s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.692979335784912s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.874934196472168s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.23790454864501953s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 82.74679517745972s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 9.466053485870361s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 40.81866931915283s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.527529239654541s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 82.09847831726074s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.757502794265747s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.6575837135314941s
Security | Sign check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.7634153366088867s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 9.13478946685791s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.0050947666168213s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.026282787322998047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.3365020751953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.001222372055053711s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.00013136863708496094s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 4.291534423828125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.1444091796875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for Catch_Record_(2014-_2019) took 2607.8460342884064s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 8.487701416015625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.0005414485931396484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.27808666229248047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.022624731063842773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.0007512569427490234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.00011515617370605469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ce4r took 13.684909343719482s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.40497303009033203s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.00028395652770996094s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.8114521503448486s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.7871227264404297s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.24279308319091797s
Interoperability | New terms check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.8953759670257568s
Versatility | Languages check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 58.12997007369995s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.17491841316223145s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.2677958011627197s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1862502098083496s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.15223264694213867s
License | MR license check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.2882213592529297s
License | HR license check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.35437583923339844s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1617889404296875s
Understandability | Number of label check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.31581902503967285s
Understandability | URI regex check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.2897186279296875s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.16638422012329102s
Verifiability | Authors check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1841433048248291s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.19820499420166016s
Performance | Throughput check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 11.154098272323608s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 6.890296936035156e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1852552890777588s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.20375275611877441s
Interlinking | skos check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.33095860481262207s
Interlinking | skos check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.16421127319335938s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1739649772644043s
Currency | Creation date check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.4354574680328369s
Currency | Modification date check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.37815403938293457s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 2.290199041366577s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 2.1457672119140625e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.14518451690673828s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.28479504585266113s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.18114304542541504s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.907914400100708s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.030178070068359375s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.029946088790893555s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.25534677505493164s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.3008718490600586s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 2.1909592151641846s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.3672280311584473s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.602787733078003s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.035114288330078125s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.2156047821044922s
Security | Sign check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.16768503189086914s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 2953.044612646103s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.0692315101623535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.021861791610717773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.0007038116455078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.0002779960632324219s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 2.86102294921875e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ceo took 3087.528730392456s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Charging Stations took 7.081031799316406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Charging Stations took 0.0002849102020263672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Charging Stations took 0.27992796897888184s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Charging Stations took 0.021535158157348633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Charging Stations took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Charging Stations took 0.0008161067962646484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Charging Stations took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Charging Stations took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for charging-stations took 5.664014101028442s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chat Game corpus took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chat Game corpus took 0.0007219314575195312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chat Game corpus took 0.2732367515563965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chat Game corpus took 0.02174234390258789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chat Game corpus took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chat Game corpus took 0.0006976127624511719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chat Game corpus took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chat Game corpus took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chat-game-corpus took 12.693497657775879s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 7.796287536621094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.0002753734588623047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.2767674922943115s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.02089858055114746s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.0007352828979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 3.8623809814453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chebi took 3.99792218208313s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chem2Bio2RDF took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.0007677078247070312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.763840913772583s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.02686786651611328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chem2Bio2RDF took 6.341934204101562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.0014846324920654297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.00010752677917480469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chem2Bio2RDF took 1.049041748046875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for chem2bio2rdf took 135.83346247673035s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ChEMBL RDF took 0.8250272274017334s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ChEMBL RDF took 0.0006396770477294922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ChEMBL RDF took 0.28385233879089355s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ChEMBL RDF took 0.027222871780395508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ChEMBL RDF took 1.7881393432617188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ChEMBL RDF took 0.001255035400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ChEMBL RDF took 7.653236389160156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ChEMBL RDF took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for chembl-rdf took 4.538214445114136s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb  dataset took 0.7694883346557617s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb  dataset took 0.0004146099090576172s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb  dataset took 10.742502450942993s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb  dataset took 2.5187201499938965s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5537841320037842s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb  dataset took 4.253990411758423s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb  dataset took 29.340941429138184s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5313365459442139s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb  dataset took 0.6582565307617188s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb  dataset took 1.4862267971038818s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb  dataset took 0.8242034912109375s
License | MR license check for chemdb  dataset took 3.1716537475585938s
License | HR license check for chemdb  dataset took 3.5604119300842285s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5409531593322754s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb  dataset took 4.4721832275390625s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb  dataset took 2.179877758026123s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5074994564056396s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb  dataset took 1.090747594833374s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb  dataset took 0.8848896026611328s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb  dataset took 12.539557695388794s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb  dataset took 6.937980651855469e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb  dataset took 0.8662645816802979s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb  dataset took 1.2631566524505615s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb  dataset took 2.424168825149536s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb  dataset took 0.49778008460998535s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb  dataset took 1.2419288158416748s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb  dataset took 1.4169163703918457s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb  dataset took 1.0316076278686523s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb  dataset took 3.452198028564453s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb  dataset took 2.86102294921875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5283863544464111s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb  dataset took 0.8503344058990479s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb  dataset took 0.8352925777435303s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb  dataset took 3.0542361736297607s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb  dataset took 0.03047013282775879s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb  dataset took 0.03883957862854004s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb  dataset took 0.8881595134735107s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb  dataset took 1.246912956237793s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb  dataset took 0.6280100345611572s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb  dataset took 4.272979497909546s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb  dataset took 1.5594592094421387s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb  dataset took 2.2707974910736084s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb  dataset took 0.03728199005126953s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb  dataset took 0.5377328395843506s
Security | Sign check for chemdb  dataset took 2.2266528606414795s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb  dataset took 2713.670670747757s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb  dataset took 1.4829277992248535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb  dataset took 0.02158832550048828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb  dataset took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb  dataset took 0.0007381439208984375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb  dataset took 0.00017118453979492188s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb  dataset took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb  dataset took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-basicInfo took 3840.5940561294556s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5278201103210449s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0002932548522949219s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 10.822830200195312s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.5394651889801025s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5531277656555176s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 4.114853620529175s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 26.97145366668701s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5333166122436523s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5348267555236816s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.4282543659210205s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.8152060508728027s
License | MR license check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.879917860031128s
License | HR license check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 4.086778879165649s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5343940258026123s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 5.01090407371521s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.9019670486450195s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.8158841133117676s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.1067543029785156s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.8092689514160156s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 12.546109437942505s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.818190336227417s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.0470471382141113s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.090378522872925s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.6251370906829834s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.1482837200164795s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.3559675216674805s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.0430362224578857s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 3.4527714252471924s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 4.291534423828125e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.4976522922515869s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.7713730335235596s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.7951295375823975s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.920121192932129s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.031202316284179688s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.03579258918762207s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.8295400142669678s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.2399420738220215s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.6281261444091797s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 4.284793376922607s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.3794970512390137s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.0660839080810547s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.03367137908935547s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5315592288970947s
Security | Sign check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.0379297733306885s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2702.9214186668396s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.0006282329559326s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.026189565658569336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.9788742065429688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0007255077362060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 6.628036499023438e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-estimatedProperties took 3830.0942142009735s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5286059379577637s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.0004744529724121094s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb phase transition dataset took 11.005064249038696s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.54496431350708s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5543789863586426s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 4.340316295623779s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 29.444384813308716s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5446469783782959s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.540642261505127s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.5681030750274658s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.848891019821167s
License | MR license check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.9141879081726074s
License | HR license check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 4.1423890590667725s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5721738338470459s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 5.720086097717285s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.9717113971710205s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.8519694805145264s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.2361843585968018s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.8664271831512451s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 13.538293600082397s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb phase transition dataset took 8.416175842285156e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.8908040523529053s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.2680845260620117s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.2510664463043213s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.4991331100463867s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.2525084018707275s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.3770208358764648s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.0314793586730957s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb phase transition dataset took 3.6989734172821045s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.86102294921875e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5096559524536133s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.8270454406738281s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.8246378898620605s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb phase transition dataset took 3.522722005844116s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.030068397521972656s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.03465700149536133s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.8369922637939453s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.2327666282653809s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.6209797859191895s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb phase transition dataset took 4.258143663406372s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.3450393676757812s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.049046039581299s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.03651309013366699s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.536757230758667s
Security | Sign check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.134469747543335s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2709.1345930099487s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.36212682723999023s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.021614789962768555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.00072479248046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.00012254714965820312s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-phaseTransition took 3832.1545703411102s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5290234088897705s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.00028228759765625s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 11.527567386627197s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.5510425567626953s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.561342716217041s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 4.299700498580933s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 27.820027828216553s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.545276403427124s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5350241661071777s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.4313366413116455s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.8042678833007812s
License | MR license check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.873079538345337s
License | HR license check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 4.0793585777282715s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5392608642578125s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 4.954586982727051s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.924769639968872s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.6226184368133545s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.1302917003631592s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.8110270500183105s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 10.085858345031738s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 6.890296936035156e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.8373565673828125s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.1916663646697998s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.095911741256714s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5028703212738037s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.142477035522461s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.3586390018463135s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.0611121654510498s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 3.7147505283355713s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 5.245208740234375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5118684768676758s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.7847640514373779s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.777137041091919s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 3.29677414894104s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.03151869773864746s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.03775215148925781s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.8132350444793701s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.2408204078674316s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.622913122177124s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 4.267570972442627s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.3456883430480957s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.050004005432129s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.035994768142700195s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5446052551269531s
Security | Sign check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.070213794708252s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2721.9361231327057s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.9852597713470459s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.022167682647705078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.0007240772247314453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.00017786026000976562s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-thermochemistry took 3839.7115120887756s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ChemPedia RDF took 4.76837158203125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ChemPedia RDF took 0.0007834434509277344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ChemPedia RDF took 0.28154659271240234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ChemPedia RDF took 0.02129340171813965s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ChemPedia RDF took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ChemPedia RDF took 0.0007662773132324219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ChemPedia RDF took 3.5762786865234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ChemPedia RDF took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for chempedia-rdf took 10.28231954574585s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chiman Maru took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chiman Maru took 0.0002551078796386719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chiman Maru took 0.2806215286254883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chiman Maru took 0.021242856979370117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chiman Maru took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chiman Maru took 0.0007576942443847656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chiman Maru took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chiman Maru took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for ChimanMaru_Entrepreneur took 2.9552881717681885s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 392.8429205417633s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.0006725788116455078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 1.2000775337219238s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.02176356315612793s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.0008454322814941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 5.9604644775390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for Chinese_Red_Classic_Song_Linked_Data_Dataset took 800.9837961196899s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chronicling America took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chronicling America took 0.0006821155548095703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chronicling America took 0.7593469619750977s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chronicling America took 0.02068018913269043s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chronicling America took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chronicling America took 0.0007579326629638672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chronicling America took 0.00010132789611816406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chronicling America took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chronicling-america took 16.051613807678223s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.8328323364257812s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.0007066726684570312s
