Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 5.793571472167969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.00038170814514160156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.273212194442749s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.845905065536499s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0007512569427490234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 0.0003948211669921875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Korespondencja Emila Szramka z Janem Kuderą took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 0080-3626 took 7.130803823471069s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用图 took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用图 took 0.0002796649932861328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用图 took 0.6945970058441162s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用图 took 0.019973039627075195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用图 took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用图 took 0.0007317066192626953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用图 took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用图 took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 10.12041geodata.290864223.ver1.db_ took 3.7258870601654053s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 113322 took 8.153915405273438e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 113322 took 0.0005822181701660156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 113322 took 0.2568521499633789s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 113322 took 0.020136117935180664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 113322 took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 113322 took 0.0007090568542480469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 113322 took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 113322 took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for 11 took 5.912981748580933s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Korepetycje Buki took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Korepetycje Buki took 0.00021529197692871094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Korepetycje Buki took 0.27855587005615234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Korepetycje Buki took 0.020126819610595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Korepetycje Buki took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Korepetycje Buki took 0.0007245540618896484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Korepetycje Buki took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Korepetycje Buki took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 12323 took 2.3609724044799805s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.061940908432006836s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.00020432472229003906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.2784290313720703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.019968748092651367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 0.0006990432739257812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 8.58306884765625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 2000 U.S. Census in RDF (rdfabout.com) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 2000-us-census-rdf took 2.4490482807159424s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 1.6122591495513916s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.0006959438323974609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.28444790840148926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.02086663246154785s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 0.0007066726684570312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 3.886222839355469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 2001 Spanish Census to RDF took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for 2001-spanish-census-to-rdf took 5.7779998779296875s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Open Data Web took 0.29769301414489746s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Open Data Web took 0.0002372264862060547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Open Data Web took 0.26914215087890625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Open Data Web took 0.02025318145751953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Open Data Web took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Open Data Web took 0.0007112026214599609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Open Data Web took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Open Data Web took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data.odw.tw took 2.72173810005188s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用 took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用 took 0.0002684593200683594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用 took 0.263200044631958s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用 took 0.020206212997436523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用 took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用 took 0.0007152557373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用 took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用 took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data1.odw.tw took 2.871677875518799s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 土地利用模型 took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 土地利用模型 took 0.0006351470947265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 土地利用模型 took 0.2480297088623047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 土地利用模型 took 0.020335674285888672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 土地利用模型 took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 土地利用模型 took 0.0007612705230712891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 土地利用模型 took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 土地利用模型 took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _data2.odw.tw took 4.971207618713379s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Indian Biodiversity took 5.173683166503906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Indian Biodiversity took 0.000682830810546875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Indian Biodiversity took 0.2866384983062744s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Indian Biodiversity took 0.020307302474975586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Indian Biodiversity took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Indian Biodiversity took 0.0007281303405761719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Indian Biodiversity took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Indian Biodiversity took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for _https:data.bioontology.orgontologiesBOFdownloadapikey=8b5b7825-538d-40e0-9e9e-5ab9274a9aeb&download_format=rdf took 3.8200697898864746s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.0006282329559326172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.24398255348205566s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.02055978775024414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 0.0007228851318359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for A collection of Papers for LREC2014 and related Workshops took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for a-collection-of-papers-for-lrec2014-and-related-workshops took 27.492258310317993s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ITS TEST DATASET took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.0006289482116699219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.2525491714477539s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.020297527313232422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ITS TEST DATASET took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ITS TEST DATASET took 0.0007226467132568359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ITS TEST DATASET took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ITS TEST DATASET took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for A1 took 2.8937277793884277s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SummerOlympics took 30.93839383125305s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SummerOlympics took 0.0006291866302490234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SummerOlympics took 0.25326085090637207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SummerOlympics took 0.020355701446533203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SummerOlympics took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SummerOlympics took 0.0007431507110595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SummerOlympics took 6.437301635742188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SummerOlympics took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for abc took 38.63562273979187s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Test_m took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Test_m took 0.000225067138671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Test_m took 0.26767706871032715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Test_m took 0.02006816864013672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Test_m took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Test_m took 0.0007226467132568359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Test_m took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Test_m took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ABC took 2.4152920246124268s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for my intro took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for my intro took 0.00024318695068359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for my intro took 0.255568265914917s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for my intro took 0.02024102210998535s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for my intro took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for my intro took 0.0007050037384033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for my intro took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for my intro took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for abhay_intro took 2.3316917419433594s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.4034287929534912s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.00034880638122558594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.2639939785003662s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.02023482322692871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.0007596015930175781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 0.0001049041748046875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Linked Data took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for abs-linked-data took 3.2918784618377686s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Academic Offer of UNL took 5.2928924560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.0002567768096923828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.2839815616607666s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.020154714584350586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Academic Offer of UNL took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Academic Offer of UNL took 0.000720977783203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Academic Offer of UNL took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Academic Offer of UNL took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for academic-offer-of-unl took 2.923788070678711s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AcadOnto took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AcadOnto took 0.0005867481231689453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AcadOnto took 0.25290393829345703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AcadOnto took 0.020352840423583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AcadOnto took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AcadOnto took 0.0007526874542236328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AcadOnto took 2.765655517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AcadOnto took 1.1444091796875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for acadonto took 4.25631308555603s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 9.71448564529419s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.0006225109100341797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.28464508056640625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.020862340927124023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 0.0007393360137939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 3.790855407714844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air Temperature Dataset took 4.0531158447265625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for acorn-sat took 36.69598698616028s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Addgene took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Addgene took 0.0008089542388916016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Addgene took 0.2617950439453125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Addgene took 0.020427227020263672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Addgene took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Addgene took 0.0007255077362060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Addgene took 3.4809112548828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Addgene took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for addgene took 15.544354677200317s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.0005590915679931641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.2640993595123291s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.02028799057006836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 0.0007264614105224609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 9.298324584960938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AEGP, Spanish Textile and Clothing Association took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aegp-spanish-textile-and-clothing-association took 4.6874589920043945s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.4982919692993164s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.0006430149078369141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.24171018600463867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.02004075050354004s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AEMET metereological dataset took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AEMET metereological dataset took 0.000701904296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AEMET metereological dataset took 3.337860107421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AEMET metereological dataset took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aemet took 5.321195602416992s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Agenda de Zaragoza took 5.507469177246094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.00024390220642089844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.28227996826171875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.020257234573364258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Agenda de Zaragoza took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Agenda de Zaragoza took 0.0007233619689941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Agenda de Zaragoza took 2.7418136596679688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Agenda de Zaragoza took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agenda-de-zaragoza took 2.9777238368988037s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AgriNepalData took 0.03141927719116211s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AgriNepalData took 0.00022840499877929688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AgriNepalData took 0.24633026123046875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AgriNepalData took 0.020222902297973633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AgriNepalData took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AgriNepalData took 0.00072479248046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AgriNepalData took 6.842613220214844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AgriNepalData took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrinepaldata took 2.426736354827881s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGRIS took 261.51865124702454s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGRIS took 0.0003371238708496094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGRIS took 0.30576395988464355s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGRIS took 0.020388364791870117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGRIS took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGRIS took 0.000728607177734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGRIS took 7.534027099609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGRIS took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agris took 554.6149663925171s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGROVOC took 0.19107580184936523s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGROVOC took 0.00032258033752441406s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for AGROVOC took 31.275894165039062s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for AGROVOC took 0.45499134063720703s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for AGROVOC took 30.086133003234863s
Interoperability | New terms check for AGROVOC took 3.6793203353881836s
Versatility | Languages check for AGROVOC took 30.082835912704468s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for AGROVOC took 30.08803677558899s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for AGROVOC took 0.08000946044921875s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for AGROVOC took 0.09232854843139648s
Availability | RDF dump link check for AGROVOC took 0.08978509902954102s
License | MR license check for AGROVOC took 0.09282064437866211s
License | HR license check for AGROVOC took 0.5954494476318359s
Amount of data | Number of property check for AGROVOC took 0.07594799995422363s
Understandability | Number of label check for AGROVOC took 30.08795738220215s
Understandability | URI regex check for AGROVOC took 0.17807388305664062s
Understandability | Vocabs check for AGROVOC took 0.1018056869506836s
Verifiability | Authors check for AGROVOC took 0.1013040542602539s
Verifiability | Publishers check for AGROVOC took 0.08917546272277832s
Performance | Throughput check for AGROVOC took 10.487972497940063s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for AGROVOC took 7.319450378417969e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for AGROVOC took 0.08670401573181152s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for AGROVOC took 0.0762479305267334s
Interlinking | skos check for AGROVOC took 3.7398364543914795s
Interlinking | skos check for AGROVOC took 4.3552086353302s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for AGROVOC took 0.10078763961791992s
Currency | Creation date check for AGROVOC took 0.1952660083770752s
Currency | Modification date check for AGROVOC took 0.16944479942321777s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for AGROVOC took 43.4703106880188s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for AGROVOC took 2.1457672119140625e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for AGROVOC took 0.0935678482055664s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for AGROVOC took 29.61540651321411s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for AGROVOC took 2.933030366897583s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for AGROVOC took 0.08441019058227539s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for AGROVOC took 12.274275541305542s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for AGROVOC took 30.104785680770874s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for AGROVOC took 14.751645803451538s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for AGROVOC took 0.0001628398895263672s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for AGROVOC took 0.08914542198181152s
Security | Sign check for AGROVOC took 0.07735371589660645s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGROVOC took 0.7479119300842285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGROVOC took 0.0205385684967041s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGROVOC took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGROVOC took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGROVOC took 0.00014972686767578125s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for AGROVOC took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGROVOC took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrovoc took 395.54512572288513s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AGROVOC took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AGROVOC took 0.00026297569274902344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AGROVOC took 0.297823429107666s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AGROVOC took 0.020177125930786133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AGROVOC took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AGROVOC took 0.0007140636444091797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AGROVOC took 5.5789947509765625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AGROVOC took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for agrovoc-skos took 4.25320839881897s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Analytics India Magazine took 0.8726940155029297s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Analytics India Magazine took 0.000621795654296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Analytics India Magazine took 0.24262332916259766s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Analytics India Magazine took 0.020214557647705078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Analytics India Magazine took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Analytics India Magazine took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Analytics India Magazine took 2.9802322387695312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Analytics India Magazine took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AIM took 5.667393684387207s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for All India Survey of Higher Education took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.0002467632293701172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.2723522186279297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.020272493362426758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for All India Survey of Higher Education took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for All India Survey of Higher Education took 0.0007266998291015625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for All India Survey of Higher Education took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for All India Survey of Higher Education took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AISHE took 2.383404493331909s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for  equipment ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for  equipment ontology took 0.0002655982971191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for  equipment ontology took 0.2641458511352539s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for  equipment ontology took 0.02031874656677246s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for  equipment ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for  equipment ontology took 0.0007154941558837891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for  equipment ontology took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for  equipment ontology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for akash took 2.3781661987304688s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.00025153160095214844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.2930610179901123s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.020372390747070312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 0.0006868839263916016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 2.7418136596679688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for aksw.org Research Group dataset took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aksworg took 2.9379358291625977s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AlchemyAPI took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AlchemyAPI took 0.0005297660827636719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AlchemyAPI took 0.26082277297973633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AlchemyAPI took 0.020161867141723633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AlchemyAPI took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AlchemyAPI took 0.0009436607360839844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AlchemyAPI took 3.457069396972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AlchemyAPI took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alchemyapi took 2.8922483921051025s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.00026154518127441406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.2384660243988037s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.020162582397460938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 0.0007407665252685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Gazetteer took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alexandria-digital-library-adl-gazetteer took 3.318427801132202s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for aliada-scanbit-net took 1.200052261352539s
Availability | VoID file availability check for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.00048828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.2775871753692627s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.020136356353759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for aliada-scanbit-net took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.0007176399230957031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for aliada-scanbit-net took 0.00011444091796875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for aliada-scanbit-net took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aliada-scanbit-net took 4.2965826988220215s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Allen Brain Atlas took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.0002694129943847656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.2917296886444092s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.020118236541748047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Allen Brain Atlas took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Allen Brain Atlas took 0.0007467269897460938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Allen Brain Atlas took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Allen Brain Atlas took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for allen-brain-atlas took 2.856706380844116s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.4687271118164062s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.0006351470947265625s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 584.8256371021271s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.9168355464935303s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.553290843963623s
Interoperability | New terms check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 3.6764466762542725s
Versatility | Languages check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 300.0692090988159s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 3.458794116973877s
Security | Check HTTPS for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.0395326614379883s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.8351061344146729s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.7956681251525879s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6051485538482666s
License | MR license check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6193573474884033s
License | HR license check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 34.228739976882935s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6191866397857666s
Understandability | Number of label check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.8737313747406006s
Understandability | URI regex check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.184260368347168s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6753354072570801s
Verifiability | Authors check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.7230541706085205s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6668057441711426s
Performance | Throughput check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 11.737426042556763s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 8.511543273925781e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5757110118865967s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6087818145751953s
Interlinking | skos check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.7177274227142334s
Interlinking | skos check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6763079166412354s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6438992023468018s
Currency | Creation date check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.1118037700653076s
Currency | Modification date check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.1963059902191162s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 204.77589893341064s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 6.946171522140503s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.5970699787139893s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6138625144958496s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6036167144775391s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 156.70009970664978s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 3.0491297245025635s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.6360368728637695s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6453039646148682s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 11.114164590835571s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 8.910102844238281s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 137.79522800445557s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.3565025329589844s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 12.591473817825317s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 2.750434637069702s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.8988957405090332s
Security | Sign check for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.6060166358947754s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 13162.442252874374s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.0906972885131836s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.02112889289855957s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 0.0008249282836914062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 7.939338684082031e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 7.084216833114624s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Allie Abbreviation And Long Form Database in Life Science took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for allie-abbreviation-and-long-form-database-in-life-science took 14756.744865655899s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alojamientos took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alojamientos took 0.00024199485778808594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alojamientos took 0.7330784797668457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alojamientos took 0.020294904708862305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alojamientos took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alojamientos took 0.00072479248046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alojamientos took 2.7179718017578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alojamientos took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alojamientos-zaragoza took 3.862363576889038s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.3109705448150635s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.0006270408630371094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.2584102153778076s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.020655155181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 0.0008571147918701172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 3.886222839355469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ALPINO RDF Treebank took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for alpino-rdf took 4.293735027313232s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AAT-atawil took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AAT-atawil took 0.00024580955505371094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AAT-atawil took 0.25135064125061035s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AAT-atawil took 0.020223379135131836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AAT-atawil took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AAT-atawil took 0.00072479248046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AAT-atawil took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AAT-atawil took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for Altawil took 2.85699200630188s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.0002624988555908203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.2691481113433838s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.020319223403930664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 0.0007357597351074219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Auckland Museum Collections Online took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for am-collections-online took 3.940171718597412s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amer Nejma took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amer Nejma took 0.00029468536376953125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amer Nejma took 0.2812957763671875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amer Nejma took 0.021056175231933594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amer Nejma took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amer Nejma took 0.0008418560028076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amer Nejma took 3.528594970703125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amer Nejma took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Amer_Nejma took 2.377603769302368s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.00026988983154296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.27635931968688965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.02038717269897461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AMOn+: Cultural Variations in Interpersonal Communication Ontology took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for amon took 2.944395065307617s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.7400023937225342s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.0004968643188476562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.2656991481781006s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.02046990394592285s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 0.0007603168487548828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 9.036064147949219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amsterdam Museum as Linked Open Data in the Europeana Data Model took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for amsterdam-museum-as-edm-lod took 4.2665016651153564s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.000270843505859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.2719690799713135s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.020331621170043945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 0.0007343292236328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Analisi del blog http://www.beppegrillo.it/ took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for analisi-del-blog-http-www-beppegrillo-it took 2.9510884284973145s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Animal Diversity Web took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Animal Diversity Web took 0.00025582313537597656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Animal Diversity Web took 0.25188589096069336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Animal Diversity Web took 0.02050614356994629s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Animal Diversity Web took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Animal Diversity Web took 0.0007390975952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Animal Diversity Web took 2.86102294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Animal Diversity Web took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for animal-diversity-web took 2.9537882804870605s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Anime Dataset took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Anime Dataset took 0.0006527900695800781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Anime Dataset took 0.253803014755249s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Anime Dataset took 0.021058082580566406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Anime Dataset took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Anime Dataset took 0.0007541179656982422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Anime Dataset took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Anime Dataset took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Anime took 3.431957244873047s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ANNO took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ANNO took 0.0006146430969238281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ANNO took 0.25162267684936523s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ANNO took 0.020244598388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ANNO took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ANNO took 0.0007596015930175781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ANNO took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ANNO took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for anno took 4.2928466796875s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.00048613548278808594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.2589714527130127s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.020284414291381836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 0.0007433891296386719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 7.581710815429688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Antique Cars Collection (Linked Cars) took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AntiqueCarsCollection took 3.600775718688965s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for apache took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for apache took 0.0006420612335205078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for apache took 0.2632019519805908s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for apache took 0.020252466201782227s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for apache took 8.58306884765625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for apache took 0.0007569789886474609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for apache took 5.269050598144531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for apache took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apache took 3.6292471885681152s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF took 0.0006148815155029297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF took 0.2402057647705078s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF took 0.020409345626831055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF took 0.0007791519165039062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf took 4.908724308013916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.0006766319274902344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.26253485679626465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.020290136337280273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 0.0007696151733398438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF CA-IT took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-ca-it took 5.779396295547485s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.0006902217864990234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.2814311981201172s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.020177602767944336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 0.0007417201995849609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-CA took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-ca took 5.7454993724823s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.0007109642028808594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.26741909980773926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.02051687240600586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 0.0007741451263427734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-ES took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-es took 5.995511770248413s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 8.487701416015625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.0007059574127197266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.24962854385375977s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.020671606063842773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 0.0011951923370361328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 5.5789947509765625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EN-GL took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-en-gl took 6.1610212326049805s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.0006859302520751953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.27854228019714355s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.020301103591918945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 0.0007336139678955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-CA took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-ca took 8.067557096481323s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.0006160736083984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.2539539337158203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.02070164680480957s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 0.000743865966796875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-EN took 4.410743713378906e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-en took 5.522015571594238s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.0006983280181884766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.25351619720458984s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.020510196685791016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 0.0007488727569580078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-ES took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-es took 5.544541597366333s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.0006532669067382812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.23813891410827637s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.020351409912109375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 0.0007102489471435547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EO-FR took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eo-fr took 5.45966649055481s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.0005986690521240234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.2625153064727783s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.020173072814941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 6.008148193359375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 0.0010089874267578125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 4.935264587402344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-AN took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-an took 5.634047985076904s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.0006527900695800781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.2676668167114258s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.020655155181884766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 0.0009381771087646484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 4.744529724121094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-AST took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ast took 5.512106657028198s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 5.435943603515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.0006403923034667969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.2627754211425781s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.02017378807067871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 0.0007262229919433594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-CA took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ca took 24.771112203598022s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.0006480216979980469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.25708723068237305s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.020291805267333984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 0.0007390975952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-GL took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-gl took 5.645103454589844s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.000583648681640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.25194597244262695s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.02033519744873047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 0.0007274150848388672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-PT took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-pt took 5.57517147064209s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.0005922317504882812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.2545015811920166s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.02046966552734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 0.0007307529449462891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF ES-RO took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-es-ro took 5.625982761383057s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 7.200241088867188e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.0005671977996826172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.2673764228820801s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.02082657814025879s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 0.0008728504180908203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 5.14984130859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EU-EN took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eu-en took 5.632124185562134s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.0010383129119873047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.2676832675933838s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.020406484603881836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 0.0007281303405761719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF EU-ES took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-eu-es took 5.626953601837158s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 6.151199340820312e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.0005517005920410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.2661857604980469s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.020192861557006836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF FR-CA took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-fr-ca took 5.489748477935791s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.00043892860412597656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.24609017372131348s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.020661115646362305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 0.0007612705230712891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF FR-ES took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-fr-es took 5.491280794143677s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 9.083747863769531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.0006129741668701172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.2637612819671631s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.023461341857910156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 0.001154184341430664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 5.6743621826171875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF OC-CA took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-oc-ca took 5.539510250091553s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.00034689903259277344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.2654736042022705s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.020404338836669922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 0.0007295608520507812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF OC-ES took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-oc-es took 5.546403408050537s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.0005865097045898438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.2658061981201172s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.020656585693359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 0.0010232925415039062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 4.935264587402344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF PT-CA took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-pt-ca took 5.626222372055054s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.0007572174072265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.2710890769958496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.02026534080505371s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 0.0007433891296386719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Apertium RDF PT-GL took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for apertium-rdf-pt-gl took 6.288026571273804s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AragoDBPedia took 0.8028438091278076s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AragoDBPedia took 0.0006284713745117188s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for AragoDBPedia took 3.8141634464263916s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for AragoDBPedia took 2.156813859939575s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for AragoDBPedia took 0.9343905448913574s
Interoperability | New terms check for AragoDBPedia took 2.2051262855529785s
Versatility | Languages check for AragoDBPedia took 60.58058214187622s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for AragoDBPedia took 4.972590684890747s
Security | Check HTTPS for AragoDBPedia took 0.2879772186279297s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for AragoDBPedia took 0.6729202270507812s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for AragoDBPedia took 1.2282118797302246s
Availability | RDF dump link check for AragoDBPedia took 0.43320274353027344s
License | MR license check for AragoDBPedia took 0.554868221282959s
License | HR license check for AragoDBPedia took 6.185931205749512s
Amount of data | Number of property check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4149775505065918s
Understandability | Number of label check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5166795253753662s
Understandability | URI regex check for AragoDBPedia took 0.875302791595459s
Understandability | Vocabs check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4723045825958252s
Verifiability | Authors check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4959590435028076s
Verifiability | Publishers check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4040398597717285s
Performance | Throughput check for AragoDBPedia took 11.935860872268677s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for AragoDBPedia took 7.343292236328125e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4802718162536621s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for AragoDBPedia took 0.4257020950317383s
Interlinking | skos check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5530831813812256s
Interlinking | skos check for AragoDBPedia took 0.39290618896484375s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for AragoDBPedia took 0.9612185955047607s
Currency | Creation date check for AragoDBPedia took 2.045954704284668s
Currency | Modification date check for AragoDBPedia took 0.8418407440185547s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for AragoDBPedia took 6.173710346221924s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for AragoDBPedia took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for AragoDBPedia took 0.41147375106811523s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for AragoDBPedia took 0.47569823265075684s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for AragoDBPedia took 0.4833362102508545s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for AragoDBPedia took 1.1846532821655273s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for AragoDBPedia took 0.029465436935424805s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for AragoDBPedia took 0.02826380729675293s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for AragoDBPedia took 0.43050193786621094s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for AragoDBPedia took 4.851877212524414s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for AragoDBPedia took 0.6197772026062012s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for AragoDBPedia took 2.8394830226898193s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for AragoDBPedia took 1.3566827774047852s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for AragoDBPedia took 5.737032890319824s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for AragoDBPedia took 0.03419828414916992s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for AragoDBPedia took 0.5903692245483398s
Security | Sign check for AragoDBPedia took 0.5589637756347656s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for AragoDBPedia took 3337.801746368408s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AragoDBPedia took 1.5560061931610107s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AragoDBPedia took 0.020864248275756836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AragoDBPedia took 2.1696090698242188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AragoDBPedia took 0.0007226467132568359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AragoDBPedia took 3.8623809814453125e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for AragoDBPedia took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AragoDBPedia took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aragodbpedia took 12766.073959112167s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archives Hub Linked Data took 30.19144082069397s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.0006442070007324219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.6972124576568604s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.020709991455078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archives Hub Linked Data took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archives Hub Linked Data took 0.0007531642913818359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archives Hub Linked Data took 4.744529724121094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archives Hub Linked Data took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for archiveshub-linkeddata took 84.23383259773254s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archivi ISMA took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archivi ISMA took 0.000354766845703125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archivi ISMA took 0.2361760139465332s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archivi ISMA took 0.020313739776611328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archivi ISMA took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archivi ISMA took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archivi ISMA took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archivi ISMA took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for archivio-isma took 3.2958085536956787s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ARIADNE took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ARIADNE took 0.0002455711364746094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ARIADNE took 0.2939910888671875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ARIADNE took 0.020677804946899414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ARIADNE took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ARIADNE took 0.0007617473602294922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ARIADNE took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ARIADNE took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ariadne took 3.308228015899658s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Aristotle University took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Aristotle University took 0.0002429485321044922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Aristotle University took 0.25805044174194336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Aristotle University took 0.020577669143676758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Aristotle University took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Aristotle University took 0.0007426738739013672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Aristotle University took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Aristotle University took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aristotle-university took 2.8817811012268066s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 5.030723810195923s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.00041222572326660156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.2465348243713379s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.02063155174255371s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 0.0008473396301269531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 3.266334533691406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of human, chimp and mouse brain took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress-e-afmx-1 took 20.303067207336426s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.00023984909057617188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.26659488677978516s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.020333051681518555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 0.0007395744323730469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of mouse cell types and tissues (GNF/Novartis) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress_e-afmx-4 took 3.760561466217041s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 3.9215919971466064s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.0012969970703125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.25902390480041504s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.02072453498840332s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 2.0265579223632812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 0.0008523464202880859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Transcription profiling of rat bladder after inoculation with bladder cancer cells took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arrayexpress_e-mtab-104 took 16.910744667053223s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.00010633468627929688s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.0005688667297363281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.27633094787597656s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.02184605598449707s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 0.00010371208190917969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Entornos interactivos. Arte en los nuevos medios (GNOSS) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for artenuevosmedios-gnoss took 7.594035625457764s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.00026988983154296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.2626171112060547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.020377397537231445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 0.0007467269897460938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Discourse on Articles (Sit'q'ua Art'ront'at'vis) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Arthron took 2.3270046710968018s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Arthroscopy community took 4.601478576660156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Arthroscopy community took 0.000362396240234375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Arthroscopy community took 0.2883918285369873s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Arthroscopy community took 0.02044081687927246s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Arthroscopy community took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Arthroscopy community took 0.0007309913635253906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Arthroscopy community took 0.000102996826171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Arthroscopy community took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for arthroscopy took 15.352866172790527s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 55.60685110092163s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0005877017974853516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.26445746421813965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.02052927017211914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.8596649169921875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Wikidata entry for Art × Science International took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for artxscienceinternational-wikidata took 70.95771169662476s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 3.390227794647217s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.0006358623504638672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.7276797294616699s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.0203855037689209s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 0.0007412433624267578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 7.677078247070312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The National Taiwan Museum's Formosan Aborigines Collections Digitizing Project (NTM-Formosan-Aborigines) took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-_NTM-Formosan-Aborigines took 13.193321466445923s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 2.3796613216400146s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.0005497932434082031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.2766592502593994s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.021537065505981445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 0.0007293224334716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 7.843971252441406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Archive of the Art Textbooks of Elementary and Public Schools in the Japanese Colonial Period (AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-AS-NTUE-School-Art-Textbooks took 11.078521490097046s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 2.3803937435150146s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.0006167888641357422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.2813751697540283s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.020609140396118164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 0.0007407665252685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 9.059906005859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Taiwan Fauna Database Research: Taiwan Digital Fish Species Database (AS-TFD-Fish-Species) took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-AS-TFD-Fish-Species took 12.469253063201904s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 2.3955774307250977s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.0006303787231445312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.28405046463012695s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.020427703857421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 0.0007317066192626953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Chinese Rare Books (CRB) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-CRB took 14.356793642044067s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 2.419734001159668s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.0006115436553955078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.2524843215942383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.020315885543823242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 0.0007145404815673828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 8.702278137207031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Chinese Television System Educational and Cultural Programs Digital Archive (CTS-TV-Programs) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-CTS-TV-Programs took 12.13010859489441s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 2.3893251419067383s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.000701904296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.253781795501709s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.020539283752441406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 0.0007283687591552734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Qing Official Titles (DQOT) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-DQOT took 12.735602617263794s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 2.4078361988067627s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.0007166862487792969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.26012635231018066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.020695924758911133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 0.0007424354553222656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 8.177757263183594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of the Han Wooden Slips Character Dictionary (WCD) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-IHP-WCD took 12.799045085906982s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 3.1845149993896484s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.0006210803985595703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.24086737632751465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.020725011825561523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 0.0007252693176269531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 8.225440979003906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Linked Taiwan Artists (LTA) took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Linked-Taiwan-Artists took 13.55397653579712s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 2.3988029956817627s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.0006253719329833984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.2647852897644043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.02037215232849121s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 0.0007359981536865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 5.459785461425781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Research on the Aquatic Animals in Taiwan and its Neighborhood Area (NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-NMMBA-Aquatic-Animals-in-Taiwan took 11.674130201339722s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 2.4151337146759033s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.0006532669067382812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.27198004722595215s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.021419525146484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 0.000728607177734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 5.435943603515625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Digital Collection of Taiwan's Fish Otoliths (NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-NMMBA-Fish-Otoliths took 11.743778705596924s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 3.575295925140381s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.0006561279296875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.2557058334350586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.02045273780822754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 0.0007355213165283203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dataset of the Qing Secret Societies (Sect of the Shifokou Wangs' Clan) took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Qing-Secret-Societies took 15.73662281036377s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 2.405726671218872s
Availability | VoID file availability check for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.0006046295166015625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.26628875732421875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.020476341247558594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 0.0010540485382080078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 8.893013000488281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for The Tibetan Collection Audio Archive Research Project (Tibetan Audio Archive) took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC-Tibetan-Audio-Archive took 11.197481393814087s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 2.416835069656372s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.0006055831909179688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.2458956241607666s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.020352840423583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 0.0007557868957519531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 7.700920104980469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dataset of the Chen Cheng-po’s Paintings and Documents (CCP) in the Taiwan Archive Information System (TAIS- ITH/ASCDC) at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC_-_CCP_Archive took 12.758840322494507s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 2.375462293624878s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.0006003379821777344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.25448131561279297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.020241975784301758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 0.0007393360137939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Database of Names and Biographies (DNB) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ASCDC_-_DNB took 11.11643671989441s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.0004942417144775391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.24715280532836914s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.02059316635131836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 0.0007662773132324219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 6.866455078125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Atlante Sintattico d'Italia (ASIt) took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asit took 9.098445177078247s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.0007462501525878906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.27663755416870117s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.02069878578186035s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 0.0007655620574951172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 5.7220458984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Automated Similarity Judgment Program lexical data took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asjp took 4.8021299839019775s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ASN:US took 0.08280277252197266s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ASN:US took 0.0002760887145996094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ASN:US took 0.2849750518798828s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ASN:US took 0.020253419876098633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ASN:US took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ASN:US took 0.0007472038269042969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ASN:US took 6.580352783203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ASN:US took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for asn-us took 6.015291929244995s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.0006666183471679688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.275301456451416s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.02039170265197754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 0.0007512569427490234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 3.0994415283203125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Talis Aspire - Manchester Metropolitan University took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aspire-mmu took 4.383563756942749s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for associations took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for associations took 0.0007405281066894531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for associations took 0.2597179412841797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for associations took 0.02033209800720215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for associations took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for associations took 0.0007855892181396484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for associations took 6.985664367675781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for associations took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for associations took 7.080784320831299s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.0002562999725341797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.2624235153198242s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.02050924301147461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 0.0007495880126953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 2.9802322387695312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ATC publikovaná SÚKL took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for atc-publikovan--s-kl took 2.909092903137207s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.0006504058837890625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.2707250118255615s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.0205075740814209s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.0008161067962646484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 0.00010752677917480469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Athelia RFID, a global knowledge network of RFID technology took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for athelia-rfid took 5.185083389282227s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AUEB Linked Open Data took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.0002498626708984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.2683563232421875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.02028632164001465s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AUEB Linked Open Data took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AUEB Linked Open Data took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AUEB Linked Open Data took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AUEB Linked Open Data took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for aueb-linked-open-data took 2.902256488800049s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.538245439529419s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.001277923583984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.27139830589294434s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.02024364471435547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 0.0007503032684326172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 4.792213439941406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Augustini Confessiones in LiLa took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AugustiniConfessiones took 4.1681623458862305s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.572242259979248s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.0005030632019042969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.280869722366333s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.0203249454498291s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 0.0007257461547851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 8.511543273925781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Alpine Ski Racers of Austria took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for austrian_ski_racers took 3.7450413703918457s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AVsOnto took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AVsOnto took 0.0005781650543212891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AVsOnto took 0.25676536560058594s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AVsOnto took 0.020247459411621094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AVsOnto took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AVsOnto took 0.0007557868957519531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AVsOnto took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AVsOnto took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for AVsOnto took 3.2573471069335938s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.22821354866027832s
Availability | VoID file availability check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.0005297660827636719s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 204.95416903495789s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.49196410179138184s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.08930563926697s
Interoperability | New terms check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 199.40355920791626s
Versatility | Languages check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.0463936328888s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.0654489994049s
Security | Check HTTPS for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.22240209579467773s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.25773167610168457s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.1698622703552246s
Availability | RDF dump link check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.10983562469482422s
License | MR license check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 55.05099892616272s
License | HR license check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.0190668106079s
Amount of data | Number of property check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.1413421630859375s
Understandability | Number of label check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 211.42003798484802s
Understandability | URI regex check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.2558114528656006s
Understandability | Vocabs check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.14139771461486816s
Verifiability | Authors check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.09401488304138184s
Verifiability | Publishers check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.10654926300048828s
Performance | Throughput check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 10.520639419555664s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 7.128715515136719e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.11115550994873047s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.0579626560211s
Interlinking | skos check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.20728325843811035s
Interlinking | skos check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.12006783485412598s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.1330559253692627s
Currency | Creation date check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.22410321235656738s
Currency | Modification date check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.21322393417358398s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 426.9707655906677s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.1672523021697998s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 33.41112470626831s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.223992109298706s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 4.728021860122681s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.1266775131225586s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 300.2081935405731s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 90.3861014842987s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 3.3066647052764893s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 301.50006914138794s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.8109142780303955s
Security | Sign check for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.16587114334106445s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.0873124599456787s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 1.601029634475708s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.021274805068969727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.1696090698242188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 0.0007257461547851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 6.4849853515625e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 2.384185791015625e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for B3Kat - Library Union Catalogues of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for b3kat took 3981.1788804531097s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BabelNet took 0.6703817844390869s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BabelNet took 0.0006313323974609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BabelNet took 0.2716703414916992s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BabelNet took 0.020926713943481445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BabelNet took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BabelNet took 0.0007429122924804688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BabelNet took 0.00018167495727539062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BabelNet took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for babelnet took 4.966852188110352s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bacevicius.lt took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bacevicius.lt took 0.0003216266632080078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bacevicius.lt took 0.27562713623046875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bacevicius.lt took 0.020354509353637695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bacevicius.lt took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bacevicius.lt took 0.0007383823394775391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bacevicius.lt took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bacevicius.lt took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bacevicius.lt took 3.248135805130005s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.5642721652984619s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.0005316734313964844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.2823061943054199s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.0204927921295166s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 0.0007317066192626953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bag took 5.2716498374938965s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.5948038101196289s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0002315044403076172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.2803313732147217s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.020290613174438477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0007321834564208984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 2.765655517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue took 3.0314228534698486s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for baixue composer took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for baixue composer took 0.0006034374237060547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for baixue composer took 0.2861459255218506s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for baixue composer took 0.020323514938354492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for baixue composer took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for baixue composer took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for baixue composer took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for baixue composer took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_composer took 2.955688238143921s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0006842613220214844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.2787148952484131s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.020548582077026367s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0007176399230957031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_imagery took 2.788423776626587s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0006756782531738281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.27272677421569824s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.020873308181762695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 红色经典歌曲 took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 红色经典歌曲 took 0.0010182857513427734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 红色经典歌曲 took 3.528594970703125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 红色经典歌曲 took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for baixue_imagery1 took 3.4344191551208496s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BAMS took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BAMS took 0.0002532005310058594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BAMS took 0.6838791370391846s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BAMS took 0.021143198013305664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BAMS took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BAMS took 0.0008521080017089844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BAMS took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BAMS took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bams took 3.2127623558044434s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0006537437438964844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.2737576961517334s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.020281553268432617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0007762908935546875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basque EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for basque-eurowordnet-lemon-lexicon-3-0 took 2.917954683303833s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Music took 0.36884570121765137s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Music took 0.0006892681121826172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Music took 0.2489335536956787s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Music took 0.020156145095825195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Music took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Music took 0.0007483959197998047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Music took 0.0001316070556640625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Music took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-music took 3.302797794342041s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Programmes took 0.34137630462646484s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Programmes took 0.00028705596923828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Programmes took 0.27216219902038574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Programmes took 0.02056741714477539s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Programmes took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Programmes took 0.0007526874542236328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Programmes took 0.00010395050048828125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Programmes took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-programmes took 10.939180374145508s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.3586299419403076s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.00035452842712402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.24593377113342285s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.020516633987426758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBC Wildlife Finder took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.0007455348968505859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBC Wildlife Finder took 0.00010132789611816406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBC Wildlife Finder took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbc-wildlife-finder took 9.442028999328613s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBOP took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBOP took 0.00027179718017578125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBOP took 0.25553441047668457s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBOP took 0.020577669143676758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBOP took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBOP took 0.0007574558258056641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBOP took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBOP took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbop took 2.81715989112854s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BBOP took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BBOP took 0.0009028911590576172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BBOP took 0.6908054351806641s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BBOP took 0.020345687866210938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BBOP took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BBOP took 0.0007314682006835938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BBOP took 2.86102294921875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BBOP took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bbop-selected took 20.448962450027466s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bdgp took 3.801126480102539s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bdgp took 0.0006079673767089844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bdgp took 0.26557135581970215s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bdgp took 0.021661043167114258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bdgp took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bdgp took 0.0009653568267822266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bdgp took 3.504753112792969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bdgp took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bdgp took 10.697763919830322s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bendev Junior took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bendev Junior took 0.00030493736267089844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bendev Junior took 0.23932933807373047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bendev Junior took 0.021368741989135742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bendev Junior took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bendev Junior took 0.0007245540618896484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bendev Junior took 2.7418136596679688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bendev Junior took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bendevoficial took 6.191256999969482s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 4.121624946594238s
Availability | VoID file availability check for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.0007417201995849609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.26797938346862793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.020216941833496094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 0.0007228851318359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 7.009506225585938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for EU: fintrans.publicdata.eu took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for beneficiaries-of-the-european-commission took 11.822768449783325s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.00022268295288085938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.2543206214904785s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.020741939544677734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 0.0008475780487060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Berlin Offener Haushalt took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for berlin-offener-haushalt took 2.8760476112365723s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for berlios took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for berlios took 0.0005388259887695312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for berlios took 0.2708723545074463s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for berlios took 0.020339012145996094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for berlios took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for berlios took 0.000720977783203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for berlios took 8.749961853027344e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for berlios took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for berlios took 3.1360058784484863s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Between Our Worlds took 5.602836608886719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Between Our Worlds took 0.0006570816040039062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Between Our Worlds took 0.32315874099731445s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Between Our Worlds took 0.020597457885742188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Between Our Worlds took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Between Our Worlds took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Between Our Worlds took 9.679794311523438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Between Our Worlds took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for betweenourworlds took 9.2591552734375s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.5062875747680664s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.0003402233123779297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.24479293823242188s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.02050638198852539s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 0.0007266998291015625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 8.940696716308594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) - Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) Linked Data took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bfs-linked-data took 3.041332960128784s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BibBase took 0.06875371932983398s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BibBase took 0.0003204345703125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BibBase took 0.2807753086090088s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BibBase took 0.020508527755737305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BibBase took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BibBase took 0.0007169246673583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BibBase took 0.00011563301086425781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BibBase took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bibbase took 2.474872350692749s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.0006024837493896484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.28111982345581055s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.020580768585205078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.0007417201995849609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 0.00010347366333007812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Escolar Digital CITA took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-escolar-digital-cita took 5.5689857006073s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.0005979537963867188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.26549839973449707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.020485877990722656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 0.0007214546203613281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 9.703636169433594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Nacional Escolar (BNEscolar) took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-nacional-escolar-bnescolar took 25.013627290725708s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.00023937225341796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.2491283416748047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.020295381546020508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 0.0007309913635253906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 2.7418136596679688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (BVMC) - Linked Open Data took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biblioteca-virtual-miguel-de-cervantes-bvmc-linked-open-data took 2.877185106277466s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.0006277561187744141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.2543473243713379s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.020327329635620117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 0.0007312297821044922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 3.361701965332031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BibSonomy - The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system. took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for BibSonomy took 9.738437414169312s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.0005877017974853516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.26804637908935547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.020603179931640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 0.0007388591766357422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 3.361701965332031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2008 took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for billion_triples_challenge_dataset2008 took 9.125252723693848s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.0005390644073486328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.25405049324035645s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.020417213439941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 0.0007231235504150391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Billion Triples Challenge Dataset 2010 took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for billion_triples_challenge_dataset_2010 took 2.47263240814209s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.0002567768096923828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.26801466941833496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.02055954933166504s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 0.0007429122924804688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::ACFSID took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-acfsid took 2.932331085205078s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 1.2704546451568604s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.0005359649658203125s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 41.15915584564209s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.5095663070678711s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 44.967310428619385s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 41.41392970085144s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 60.12830066680908s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.13152217864990234s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.9071462154388428s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.208665132522583s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 6.284196138381958s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.5045907497406006s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 60.105714321136475s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.13559985160827637s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 9.823073863983154s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.4032571315765381s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.13382935523986816s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.13949799537658691s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.13648605346679688s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 10.667897701263428s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 76.51524686813354s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.6057150363922119s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.2786073684692383s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.8749983310699463s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.19477128982543945s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.11606740951538086s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.28777194023132324s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.22922801971435547s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 118.939532995224s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 43.05033016204834s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.32309556007385254s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.1486504077911377s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.12291336059570312s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 17.970155477523804s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.8788871765136719s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.6733648777008057s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.34997129440307617s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 70.50649905204773s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 2.2511188983917236s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 12.578329086303711s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 1.3249914646148682s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 61.401957750320435s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.7061522006988525s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.8583855628967285s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.1285402774810791s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 12.50637412071228s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.8397865295410156s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.020465850830078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 0.0007240772247314453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 9.369850158691406e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 44.425535440444946s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Affymetrix took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-affymetrix took 1148.9335541725159s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.5058238506317139s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.0005729198455810547s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 35.781423807144165s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 1.3005383014678955s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 43.62401580810547s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 43.82668900489807s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 60.24392580986023s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.26155781745910645s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.16724848747253418s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.7364251613616943s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.31314754486083984s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 6.299922466278076s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.5537197589874268s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 60.22806906700134s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.252988338470459s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 10.226174116134644s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.5517745018005371s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.2576589584350586s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.26847195625305176s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.2748599052429199s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 11.550971031188965s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 74.3551344871521s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.5837619304656982s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.3360912799835205s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.7964591979980469s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.35640835762023926s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.236985445022583s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.4851813316345215s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.5140070915222168s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 119.96182084083557s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 53.29421615600586s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.4005453586578369s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.28797030448913574s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.3030853271484375s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 17.84149670600891s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.8919217586517334s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.6640477180480957s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.5714993476867676s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 70.84936857223511s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 2.4235806465148926s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 12.202971458435059s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 1.3242075443267822s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 61.56746435165405s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.7118794918060303s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 1.390862226486206s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.26513075828552246s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 12.263478994369507s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.8789732456207275s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.02033543586730957s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.0007388591766357422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 0.00011849403381347656s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 65.84122705459595s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Biomodels took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-biomodels took 1181.6253798007965s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.00027489662170410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.2781410217285156s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.020839929580688477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 0.0007476806640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::BioModels::BioPAX took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-biomodels-biopax took 4.610261678695679s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.45801281929016113s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.0005648136138916016s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 33.41560959815979s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 1.2382655143737793s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 43.22086429595947s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 41.3711621761322s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 60.254820346832275s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.30207300186157227s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.14405369758605957s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.274167537689209s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.34139561653137207s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 6.416089296340942s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.45298266410827637s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 60.24885416030884s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.28497862815856934s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 9.971982479095459s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.5595760345458984s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.24585652351379395s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.2752196788787842s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.2597970962524414s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 11.239747285842896s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 75.46680569648743s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 1.5426650047302246s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.4448888301849365s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 1.244363784790039s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.35026049613952637s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.26763248443603516s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.5403640270233154s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.5169684886932373s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 118.1564028263092s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 72.60698580741882s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.4470560550689697s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.3100137710571289s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.29968881607055664s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 18.489969730377197s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.8865885734558105s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.6527864933013916s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.5031781196594238s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 70.21547389030457s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 2.3825018405914307s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 11.407823324203491s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 1.341050624847412s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 61.73436784744263s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.7165529727935791s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.4292635917663574s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.2868008613586426s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 12.375266313552856s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.6360442638397217s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.02047276496887207s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.0007779598236083984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 0.0004055500030517578s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 42.04479646682739s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Bioportal took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-bioportal took 1182.5738134384155s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.13529515266418457s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.00066375732421875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.26190972328186035s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.019887447357177734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 0.0007100105285644531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 5.364418029785156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Chembl took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-chembl took 17.51458191871643s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.47924351692199707s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.0006005764007568359s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 36.031787395477295s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 1.263273000717163s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 45.205256938934326s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 41.076074838638306s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 60.247419595718384s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.26232004165649414s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.14369940757751465s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.9088945388793945s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.3209083080291748s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 6.408374071121216s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.6214919090270996s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 60.24570178985596s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.267348051071167s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 10.633306980133057s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.5837094783782959s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.26224660873413086s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.2546672821044922s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.2699756622314453s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 11.022084474563599s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 76.4626817703247s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 2.056260347366333s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.338451623916626s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.71954345703125s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.34410572052001953s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.2554142475128174s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.5641689300537109s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.5165963172912598s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 121.39385318756104s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 82.05471587181091s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.40387749671936035s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.2676889896392822s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.27455854415893555s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 19.429218769073486s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.8899977207183838s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.652393102645874s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.5112509727478027s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 70.42896890640259s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 2.493942975997925s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 12.45316481590271s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 1.2961163520812988s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 61.51996111869812s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.699213981628418s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.4239828586578369s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.2911534309387207s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 12.382309436798096s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.9988436698913574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.0203855037689209s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 0.0007297992706298828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 76.90209913253784s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Clinicaltrials took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-clinicaltrials took 1238.4239919185638s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.4521665573120117s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.0006396770477294922s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 34.20413160324097s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 1.2717723846435547s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 43.42074632644653s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 42.42924213409424s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 60.27654314041138s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.27712059020996094s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.15285325050354004s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 1.1963438987731934s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.32997655868530273s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 6.421895265579224s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.6462466716766357s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 60.243155002593994s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.2407550811767578s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 11.034576654434204s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.5763154029846191s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.26544690132141113s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.2761352062225342s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.279315710067749s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 10.596388101577759s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 71.58081340789795s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.2615971565246582s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.4270358085632324s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 1.0208439826965332s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.35890674591064453s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.2853994369506836s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.5286469459533691s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.5119247436523438s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 121.44689106941223s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 67.09717845916748s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.5905437469482422s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.3127150535583496s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.29775428771972656s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 19.153159379959106s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.89375901222229s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.6564304828643799s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.468414306640625s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 71.93088674545288s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 2.4071080684661865s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 11.79731011390686s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 1.3278436660766602s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 61.561869621276855s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.7033381462097168s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.4664156436920166s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.2795546054840088s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 12.193079233169556s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.7710733413696289s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.020450353622436523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 0.0007345676422119141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 6.961822509765625e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 72.36444664001465s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ctd took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ctd took 1210.836242198944s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-dataset took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.00037479400634765625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.2548666000366211s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.02054572105407715s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-dataset took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-dataset took 0.0007617473602294922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-dataset took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-dataset took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-dataset took 3.132667303085327s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.4810829162597656s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.0006155967712402344s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 34.88406205177307s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 1.221935510635376s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 44.06011962890625s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 44.107314348220825s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 60.25470519065857s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.2762322425842285s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.15677404403686523s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.745126485824585s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.35428428649902344s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 6.414173364639282s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.4953629970550537s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 60.25994539260864s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.29277729988098145s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 11.174251794815063s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.585444450378418s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.2799856662750244s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.25788331031799316s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.25507497787475586s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 11.232591390609741s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 76.45444536209106s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 1.3827128410339355s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.38333559036254883s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 1.0735993385314941s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.47434306144714355s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.27314329147338867s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.520951509475708s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.49512720108032227s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 120.25143957138062s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 72.28965020179749s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.42635679244995117s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.27428531646728516s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.2899761199951172s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 19.502073764801025s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.8870902061462402s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.664785623550415s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.5251367092132568s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 70.72042655944824s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 2.386331558227539s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 11.693864107131958s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 1.307847261428833s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 61.696231842041016s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.6987254619598389s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.43221259117126465s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.26293063163757324s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 12.09124755859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.630643367767334s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.0205690860748291s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 0.000705718994140625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 6.556510925292969e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 67.97360491752625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Dbsnp took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-dbsnp took 1210.7886419296265s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.4687228202819824s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.001131296157836914s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 33.412914752960205s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 1.2774145603179932s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 43.89351487159729s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 41.98395752906799s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 60.262330293655396s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.28478384017944336s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.15655827522277832s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.8378317356109619s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.31775617599487305s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 6.377460479736328s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.5088860988616943s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 60.25923252105713s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.25910019874572754s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 10.102212905883789s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.5779731273651123s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.2760472297668457s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.25126004219055176s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.26469969749450684s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 10.856837272644043s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 72.28432607650757s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.6229054927825928s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.3710207939147949s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.8620662689208984s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.3446633815765381s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.2571372985839844s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.4888648986816406s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.5222923755645752s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 121.35052871704102s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 81.06269097328186s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.43452954292297363s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.2807290554046631s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.27231550216674805s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 19.45046067237854s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.8883440494537354s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.6567988395690918s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.43462657928466797s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 70.26866841316223s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 2.4121785163879395s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 11.7412109375s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 1.305994987487793s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 61.564595460891724s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.6990461349487305s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.44394898414611816s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.2901020050048828s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 12.018023490905762s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.8749380111694336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.020604372024536133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.0007123947143554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 0.00010704994201660156s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 75.42825651168823s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Drugbank took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-drugbank took 1218.965537071228s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.46576595306396484s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.0006372928619384766s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Genage took 35.94659972190857s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Genage took 1.2097902297973633s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 43.5396614074707s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 41.83581256866455s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 60.25679397583008s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.29353904724121094s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.15767288208007812s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.9478023052215576s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.31185364723205566s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 6.3357977867126465s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.578026533126831s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 60.25930070877075s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.25891995429992676s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 10.175092935562134s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.6164040565490723s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.26444172859191895s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.2616093158721924s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.27518773078918457s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 11.559444665908813s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Genage took 75.39720010757446s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.7502486705780029s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.3770568370819092s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 1.0440638065338135s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.3480958938598633s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.24281620979309082s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.521625280380249s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.513547420501709s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Genage took 120.4978256225586s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 67.97422814369202s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.4460771083831787s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.275651216506958s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.28702282905578613s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Genage took 17.64248013496399s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.8862466812133789s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.6633281707763672s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.40077900886535645s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Genage took 70.75514388084412s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Genage took 2.4304094314575195s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Genage took 11.906398057937622s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Genage took 1.3164451122283936s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Genage took 61.57786464691162s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.7352309226989746s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.602288007736206s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.26232171058654785s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Genage took 12.055073022842407s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.9769549369812012s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.0203702449798584s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Genage took 1.71661376953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Genage took 0.0007207393646240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Genage took 5.626678466796875e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Genage took 51.99650168418884s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Genage took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-genage took 1187.974323272705s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.000286102294921875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.28311586380004883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.020737886428833008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 0.0007245540618896484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 6.008148193359375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::GenBank took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-genbank took 3.937486410140991s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.46005773544311523s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.0005927085876464844s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 35.23448300361633s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 1.3194918632507324s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 43.56509733200073s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 40.988219261169434s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 60.263710498809814s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.25765180587768555s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.1678609848022461s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 1.2872328758239746s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.31505537033081055s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 6.3574724197387695s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.4563922882080078s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 60.22846984863281s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.26224803924560547s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 10.706158638000488s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.6097903251647949s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.26181793212890625s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.2564821243286133s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.2623107433319092s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 10.51558804512024s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 75.725412607193s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 1.0774633884429932s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.3833441734313965s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.9285728931427002s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.37995386123657227s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.2634570598602295s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.49555444717407227s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.5463595390319824s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 120.53714919090271s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 64.3554584980011s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.43369150161743164s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.2917909622192383s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.27826428413391113s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 18.466948747634888s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.8813977241516113s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.6556541919708252s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.4476027488708496s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 70.48804998397827s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 2.3825573921203613s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 11.64070463180542s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 1.3360161781311035s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 61.57498574256897s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.7116198539733887s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 1.4098241329193115s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.30052971839904785s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 12.852846622467041s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.4550058841705322s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.020639419555664062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 2.47955322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 0.0010039806365966797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 5.7697296142578125e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 71.7728681564331s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Gendr took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-gendr took 1201.3014993667603s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.4619147777557373s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.0006005764007568359s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Goa took 35.92893838882446s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Goa took 1.253530740737915s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 43.64114189147949s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 44.474045753479004s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 60.23949885368347s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.2907695770263672s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.14310145378112793s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.8350951671600342s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.31764817237854004s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 6.341195821762085s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.5696771144866943s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 60.250754594802856s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.28180360794067383s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 10.766564846038818s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.5722475051879883s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.264357328414917s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.2698662281036377s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.26684069633483887s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 11.08064866065979s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Goa took 74.93396544456482s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.2589244842529297s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.42490649223327637s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.7366104125976562s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.3229355812072754s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.2745532989501953s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.5279874801635742s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.5065388679504395s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Goa took 119.96328997612s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 52.053465127944946s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.6331231594085693s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.2621498107910156s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.28296542167663574s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Goa took 19.131747007369995s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.8904304504394531s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.6742589473724365s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.384289026260376s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Goa took 71.20882081985474s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Goa took 2.408942937850952s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Goa took 11.798575639724731s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Goa took 1.3023381233215332s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Goa took 61.55817437171936s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.7024950981140137s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.4081089496612549s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.28009533882141113s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Goa took 12.331515789031982s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.5840973854064941s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.020516157150268555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Goa took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Goa took 0.0007290840148925781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Goa took 5.6743621826171875e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Goa took 68.80136108398438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Goa took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-goa took 1200.7567915916443s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.4746055603027344s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.0006470680236816406s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 34.62847352027893s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 1.272425651550293s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 43.835484743118286s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 42.12382674217224s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 60.25728487968445s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.2591836452484131s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.16794824600219727s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.9820585250854492s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.32196974754333496s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 6.432687997817993s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.6449453830718994s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 60.257667779922485s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.25200605392456055s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 10.913830041885376s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.5806131362915039s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.24890470504760742s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.25746583938598633s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.25079846382141113s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 11.262503147125244s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 77.59193301200867s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.2837252616882324s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.3836331367492676s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.8678798675537109s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.35976529121398926s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.2702054977416992s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.5185129642486572s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.5124678611755371s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 123.89785075187683s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 81.52797555923462s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.5636816024780273s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.2612574100494385s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.2829623222351074s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 18.171222925186157s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.8819155693054199s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.6579468250274658s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.4462246894836426s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 70.71955394744873s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 2.512873649597168s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 11.931912422180176s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 1.2735273838043213s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 61.532365798950195s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.7302300930023193s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.4204258918762207s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.274458646774292s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 12.08987545967102s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.3737659454345703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.02013850212097168s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.0007169246673583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 0.00011110305786132812s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 72.13634514808655s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Hgnc took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-hgnc took 1234.8585321903229s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.4830195903778076s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.0006844997406005859s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 33.35390782356262s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 1.2778451442718506s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 43.604591369628906s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 46.91785264015198s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 60.24215841293335s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.28572750091552734s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.15383529663085938s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 1.2462084293365479s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.29276108741760254s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 6.316854000091553s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.450972318649292s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 60.25803470611572s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.2518806457519531s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 11.05016303062439s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.583531379699707s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.2793455123901367s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.25867533683776855s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.24071741104125977s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 11.392696619033813s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 76.55317878723145s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.2632906436920166s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.3848586082458496s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 1.0255091190338135s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.3509073257446289s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.2799241542816162s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.4996788501739502s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.5125081539154053s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 122.46161413192749s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 82.25506258010864s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.5922672748565674s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.28505659103393555s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.29009389877319336s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 18.094889163970947s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.8793141841888428s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.683917760848999s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.47306203842163086s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 70.30770516395569s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 2.418273448944092s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 11.650129079818726s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 1.3130033016204834s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 61.53952240943909s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.7282180786132812s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.4318413734436035s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.2725522518157959s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 11.172019004821777s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 1.4929263591766357s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.020719051361083984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 0.0007288455963134766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 5.602836608886719e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 12.34032392501831s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Homologene took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-homologene took 1175.5539808273315s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::INOH took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.00028514862060546875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.26897406578063965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.021227359771728516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::INOH took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::INOH took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::INOH took 3.2901763916015625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::INOH took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-inoh took 3.3911943435668945s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 1.292937994003296s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.000667572021484375s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 35.164196729660034s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 1.2693958282470703s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 44.14674925804138s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 41.10080122947693s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 60.24214506149292s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.2664482593536377s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.15462851524353027s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 1.250413179397583s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.32158589363098145s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 6.395117282867432s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.5033748149871826s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 60.266791105270386s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.28081369400024414s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 11.161598920822144s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.5765540599822998s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.2553260326385498s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.2771642208099365s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.26291441917419434s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 10.814188957214355s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 74.5852530002594s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.2432258129119873s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.3490560054779053s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.7714917659759521s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.3481006622314453s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.2950286865234375s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.537189245223999s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.49991345405578613s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 120.23793864250183s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 19.43244743347168s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.42309021949768066s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.28920555114746094s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.27751922607421875s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 17.97993516921997s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.8812940120697021s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.6537065505981445s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.663499116897583s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 70.58814024925232s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 2.414349317550659s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 11.0790855884552s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 1.3011012077331543s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 61.596240282058716s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.710453987121582s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.4284336566925049s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.27492642402648926s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 12.065266132354736s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.4488232135772705s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.020491361618041992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 1.8835067749023438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.0007309913635253906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 0.00010061264038085938s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 48.43562650680542s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Interpro took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-interpro took 1143.18062210083s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.14042043685913086s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.0006196498870849609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.2690393924713135s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.020348787307739258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 0.0006997585296630859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 7.128715515136719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Iproclass took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-iproclass took 17.175245761871338s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.4669790267944336s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.0005726814270019531s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 34.745460987091064s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 1.2415742874145508s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 43.83588886260986s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 41.741114377975464s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 60.25258946418762s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.27005553245544434s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.15682387351989746s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 1.1461737155914307s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.3317091464996338s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 6.362233877182007s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.4387059211730957s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 60.24011564254761s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.257659912109375s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 10.290432453155518s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.6016113758087158s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.25565457344055176s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.27923035621643066s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.2701146602630615s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 11.309386253356934s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 74.46185255050659s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.28534483909606934s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.3830678462982178s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.9316072463989258s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.3533627986907959s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.25617527961730957s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.5250258445739746s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.5280532836914062s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 119.4244077205658s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 59.25827670097351s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.5921149253845215s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.30193090438842773s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.27382946014404297s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 18.787229537963867s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.8803434371948242s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.6675105094909668s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.4315359592437744s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 70.96605062484741s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 2.369842290878296s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 11.692775964736938s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 1.3006618022918701s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 61.56569147109985s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.7021872997283936s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.47836828231811523s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.28484249114990234s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 11.789439916610718s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.5161352157592773s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.020203351974487305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 0.0007307529449462891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 8.58306884765625e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 62.02167797088623s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Irefindex took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-irefindex took 1191.870069026947s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 5.030632019042969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.0002815723419189453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.25211286544799805s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.020298242568969727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 0.0007128715515136719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 6.318092346191406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::KEGG took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-kegg took 3.7816483974456787s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.0002505779266357422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.28378987312316895s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.020821571350097656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 0.0007555484771728516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 3.170967102050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::KEGG::BioPAX took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-kegg-biopax took 3.874390125274658s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.13583970069885254s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.0004582405090332031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.24072861671447754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.020467519760131836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 0.0007147789001464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Linkedspl took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-linkedspl took 9.491567134857178s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.46297740936279297s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.0006124973297119141s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 34.42834806442261s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 1.2468347549438477s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 44.53748297691345s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 41.716548204422s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 60.23738408088684s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.28895092010498047s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.15697550773620605s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.9059054851531982s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.3311879634857178s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 6.33201789855957s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.464735746383667s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 60.24808120727539s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.2898385524749756s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 10.108349323272705s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.5794961452484131s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.2605867385864258s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.25780177116394043s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.2761714458465576s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 11.23846173286438s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 76.06105399131775s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 1.0416600704193115s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.37494683265686035s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 1.1027114391326904s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.3776717185974121s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.2549285888671875s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.5141904354095459s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.5327489376068115s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 118.71987795829773s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 96.91139817237854s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.4673750400543213s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.2859523296356201s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.3080453872680664s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 19.358726978302002s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.8989930152893066s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.6617920398712158s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.4053518772125244s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 70.58621907234192s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 2.5742595195770264s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 13.234063148498535s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 1.3615193367004395s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 61.52837562561035s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.7137489318847656s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.4415857791900635s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.2870161533355713s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 11.776356935501099s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.8666720390319824s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.020734786987304688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 80.18789553642273s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Lsr took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-lsr took 1240.1478471755981s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.4788696765899658s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.0006279945373535156s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 34.57485318183899s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 1.2374954223632812s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 44.54735016822815s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 42.343743085861206s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 60.252981185913086s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.2798655033111572s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.14551138877868652s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 1.455660104751587s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.3222815990447998s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 6.340924263000488s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.5697362422943115s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 60.25533175468445s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.25302863121032715s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 10.23505449295044s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.5651543140411377s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.24763035774230957s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.2839782238006592s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.24833369255065918s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 10.65047001838684s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 72.77954387664795s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 1.3899362087249756s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.388308048248291s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.8908259868621826s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.34865784645080566s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.27483677864074707s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.5274794101715088s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.5018405914306641s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 121.37661981582642s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 80.97121715545654s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.4303934574127197s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.2776792049407959s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.2811276912689209s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 17.62541890144348s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.8749604225158691s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.6834738254547119s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.42382025718688965s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 70.77041411399841s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 2.3937623500823975s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 11.609647035598755s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 1.3159043788909912s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 61.683836460113525s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.6994740962982178s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.40795254707336426s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.27616000175476074s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 10.805218935012817s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.929100513458252s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.020279645919799805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 0.0007047653198242188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 6.818771362304688e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 83.01524710655212s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Mesh took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-mesh took 1223.1628587245941s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.4674081802368164s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.0006155967712402344s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 33.35772514343262s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 1.2673656940460205s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 44.73999071121216s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 43.57197904586792s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 60.243019580841064s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.2885286808013916s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.16991686820983887s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 1.0830729007720947s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.3442254066467285s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 6.397711753845215s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.4838883876800537s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 60.23520040512085s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.26357412338256836s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 11.177251100540161s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.5923891067504883s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.2443404197692871s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.26512789726257324s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.2664315700531006s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 11.22218918800354s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 77.59396553039551s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.5536386966705322s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.3919410705566406s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.9153962135314941s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.3424253463745117s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.2779123783111572s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.5045740604400635s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.5048770904541016s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 120.87570357322693s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 83.70559239387512s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.4260544776916504s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.28604817390441895s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.2745635509490967s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 17.20884680747986s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.8807954788208008s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.6656754016876221s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.4988412857055664s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 71.05291485786438s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 2.41687273979187s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 12.014027118682861s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 1.3145341873168945s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 61.5401885509491s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.7233781814575195s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.4837322235107422s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.2787039279937744s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 10.918334722518921s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.42232179641723633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.020603418350219727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 2.09808349609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 0.0007240772247314453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 9.775161743164062e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 84.12901449203491s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Mgi took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-mgi took 1242.2882070541382s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.45534706115722656s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.0006222724914550781s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 36.28041744232178s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 1.2370691299438477s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 43.9583740234375s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 41.43677020072937s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 60.247360944747925s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.25830817222595215s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.16160368919372559s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.7967088222503662s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.3155677318572998s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 6.357190847396851s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.5096893310546875s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 60.262004137039185s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.27825212478637695s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 10.346425533294678s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.6093990802764893s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.26520228385925293s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.2665445804595947s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.25093984603881836s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 11.226771116256714s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 76.62156224250793s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.2643132209777832s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.3601107597351074s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.7843022346496582s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.34885144233703613s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.2906484603881836s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.513380765914917s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.5182583332061768s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 121.7667293548584s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 81.31983232498169s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.6058502197265625s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.2732861042022705s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.30480217933654785s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 18.426223516464233s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.8757834434509277s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.694979190826416s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.42996907234191895s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 70.66850423812866s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 2.3970487117767334s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 11.665324449539185s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 1.3245718479156494s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 61.521180152893066s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.7086906433105469s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.43715381622314453s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.2761111259460449s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 11.062256813049316s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.5030660629272461s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.02034783363342285s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.0007228851318359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 0.00010800361633300781s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 82.03718709945679s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ncbigene took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ncbigene took 1237.1640548706055s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.5760014057159424s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.0005311965942382812s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 36.06825637817383s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 1.2714571952819824s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 43.20729088783264s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 41.56961250305176s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 60.24059796333313s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.2751033306121826s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.1652979850769043s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.9592862129211426s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.31757521629333496s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 6.380460739135742s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.5210525989532471s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 60.25033736228943s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.286574125289917s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 10.520670175552368s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.5772755146026611s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.2688286304473877s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.26750636100769043s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.27794837951660156s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 11.036083936691284s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 73.74340581893921s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 1.519148349761963s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.3661508560180664s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 1.0334312915802002s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.4002509117126465s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.27749037742614746s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.5364699363708496s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.5274307727813721s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 120.50334215164185s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 78.32389092445374s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.4158492088317871s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.277423620223999s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.2751190662384033s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 18.509418725967407s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.8838555812835693s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.7055566310882568s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.4654214382171631s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 70.80308818817139s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 2.439253330230713s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 11.951549768447876s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 1.3293442726135254s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 61.82228231430054s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.7117762565612793s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.4269428253173828s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.2809896469116211s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 11.299142360687256s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 1.4026122093200684s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.020743608474731445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 1.9073486328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 0.0007159709930419922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 5.555152893066406e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 18.48598885536194s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Ndc took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-ndc took 1160.6470806598663s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.0002658367156982422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.27170538902282715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.020624637603759766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 0.0008184909820556641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 3.170967102050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::NetPath took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-netpath took 3.8345019817352295s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.14629101753234863s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.0006380081176757812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.2785980701446533s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.02039957046508789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 1.6689300537109375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 0.0007648468017578125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 3.5762786865234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::neXtProt took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-nextprot took 3.7822728157043457s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.5782177448272705s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.0005865097045898438s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Omim took 35.94089460372925s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Omim took 1.2609155178070068s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 43.8561475276947s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 42.04730772972107s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 60.24549913406372s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.2718055248260498s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.15940213203430176s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 1.2645585536956787s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.3229954242706299s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 6.366965055465698s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.44887614250183105s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 60.236581802368164s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.2908053398132324s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 11.233627319335938s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.583308219909668s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.24450945854187012s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.27678656578063965s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.2754826545715332s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 11.092156887054443s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Omim took 75.65769505500793s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.697068452835083s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.38884615898132324s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.8733658790588379s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.3675508499145508s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.26114463806152344s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.5238621234893799s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.49718689918518066s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Omim took 124.74251937866211s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 105.67679262161255s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.4315629005432129s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.2997255325317383s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.27576780319213867s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Omim took 19.50242590904236s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.8811123371124268s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.6645500659942627s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.5495903491973877s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Omim took 69.92658686637878s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Omim took 2.677434206008911s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Omim took 12.12834095954895s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Omim took 1.3309147357940674s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Omim took 61.60136103630066s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.7185781002044678s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.43706750869750977s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.26667141914367676s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Omim took 12.052332401275635s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.9671483039855957s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.020644187927246094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Omim took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.0007660388946533203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Omim took 0.00013828277587890625s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Omim took 36.63150763511658s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Omim took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-omim took 1215.9789423942566s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.0007548332214355469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.2858598232269287s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.01998734474182129s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 0.0006928443908691406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 3.910064697265625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-omim-resources took 3.236435890197754s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.6000087261199951s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.0006690025329589844s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 36.115802526474s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 1.2580811977386475s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 44.4475793838501s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 42.146421670913696s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 60.256125688552856s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.26989269256591797s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.15374302864074707s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.9454162120819092s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.3125307559967041s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 6.35028076171875s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.5039565563201904s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 60.255568504333496s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.2591674327850342s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 10.170809030532837s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.5498058795928955s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.24476981163024902s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.2732818126678467s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.26291418075561523s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 10.597622156143188s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 76.6777503490448s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.8585481643676758s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.37709641456604004s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.89508056640625s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.40583229064941406s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.2690160274505615s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.5498623847961426s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.5062963962554932s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 118.49628686904907s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 80.89771556854248s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.43744635581970215s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.25921106338500977s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.28095483779907227s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 18.42798662185669s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.8855509757995605s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.6659548282623291s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.4348180294036865s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 69.87244653701782s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 2.401217460632324s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 11.756508111953735s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 1.2928519248962402s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 61.84484362602234s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.7068691253662109s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.4345879554748535s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.2815401554107666s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 11.297260999679565s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 1.558502435684204s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.02049422264099121s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 0.0007064342498779297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 8.153915405273438e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 80.29939603805542s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Orphanet took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-orphanet took 1232.6082985401154s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.14600443840026855s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.0006349086761474609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.27358055114746094s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.020235061645507812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 0.0007126331329345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pathwaycommons took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pathwaycommons took 9.461044549942017s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.5728616714477539s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.0005443096160888672s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 34.82355284690857s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 1.257444143295288s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 43.075514793395996s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 40.43425917625427s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 60.26479387283325s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.2764251232147217s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.14650750160217285s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 1.0400524139404297s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.31809139251708984s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 6.329928398132324s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.5536811351776123s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 60.245288372039795s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.26787400245666504s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 10.829513311386108s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.5691514015197754s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.2431037425994873s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.26987123489379883s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.2604217529296875s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 11.05611252784729s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 75.28437185287476s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.6907958984375s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.4036521911621094s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.9821262359619141s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.35822153091430664s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.274273157119751s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.4998819828033447s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.5051794052124023s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 124.05817461013794s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 110.56962871551514s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.41429805755615234s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.26117944717407227s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.26750922203063965s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 17.2908833026886s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.889535665512085s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.6658294200897217s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.5773105621337891s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 70.58587193489075s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 2.6777358055114746s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 11.254107475280762s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 1.317380666732788s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 61.52633452415466s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.7053380012512207s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.43804359436035156s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.286663293838501s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 11.08993649482727s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.6340930461883545s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.020729541778564453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 1.9550323486328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 0.0007474422454833984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 7.176399230957031e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 104.08725905418396s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pharmgkb took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pharmgkb took 1285.9848053455353s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.0002636909484863281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.2639954090118408s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.019980669021606445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 0.0007073879241943359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PharmGKB::BioPAX took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pharmgkb-biopax took 4.603018522262573s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PID took 8.58306884765625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.0002930164337158203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.27527308464050293s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.02043628692626953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PID took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PID took 0.0007336139678955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PID took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PID took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pid took 3.719919443130493s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.00025010108947753906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.6901028156280518s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.020209312438964844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 0.0007252693176269531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::PubChem took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pubchem-2 took 4.325805902481079s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.5914402008056641s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.0005946159362792969s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 36.94131946563721s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 1.2436716556549072s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 44.36889576911926s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 42.2467246055603s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 60.24718117713928s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.2673482894897461s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.16451573371887207s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.6044893264770508s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.33296799659729004s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 6.358144998550415s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.5053949356079102s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 60.2417516708374s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.2697262763977051s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 9.729375123977661s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.5919034481048584s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.27870631217956543s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.28205227851867676s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.24553251266479492s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 11.451371192932129s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 77.08819961547852s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.7307429313659668s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.3831515312194824s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.8938121795654297s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.3460202217102051s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.2739603519439697s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.49634766578674316s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.5037040710449219s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 118.73567843437195s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 181.49049830436707s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.7270684242248535s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.2674071788787842s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.2783679962158203s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 17.15524959564209s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.876030445098877s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.6620678901672363s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.45667481422424316s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 70.46748089790344s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 2.389808416366577s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 10.978232145309448s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 1.2822654247283936s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 61.59880352020264s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.7161695957183838s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.4255344867706299s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.2848842144012451s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 11.523660659790039s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.4601607322692871s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.020308971405029297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.0007090568542480469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 0.00014209747314453125s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 149.50421333312988s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Pubmed took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-pubmed took 1394.9849400520325s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.0002624988555908203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.706204891204834s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.02131819725036621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 1.621246337890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 0.0007162094116210938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 6.747245788574219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Reactome took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-reactome took 4.695677280426025s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.00015401840209960938s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.00025463104248046875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.7112860679626465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.020115375518798828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 0.0007271766662597656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 5.14984130859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Rhea took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-rhea took 3.780627727508545s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.14441657066345215s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.0005393028259277344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.3511519432067871s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.020467281341552734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 0.0007357597351074219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 7.605552673339844e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sabiork took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sabiork took 9.622406959533691s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.5926861763000488s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.0005631446838378906s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 37.762813568115234s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 1.2333605289459229s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 44.47430419921875s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 40.89177370071411s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 60.26801013946533s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.27390098571777344s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.1507854461669922s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.8761494159698486s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.35847902297973633s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 6.399580717086792s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.4863450527191162s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 60.240310192108154s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.26708340644836426s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 10.921212911605835s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.6170930862426758s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.2707188129425049s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.2728438377380371s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.26764369010925293s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 10.9980309009552s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 74.80327200889587s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 2.164768934249878s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.37479352951049805s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.8702077865600586s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.38416028022766113s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.2655754089355469s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.5006411075592041s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.4980909824371338s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 119.43761014938354s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 20.02700972557068s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.45180463790893555s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.27866601943969727s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.2756350040435791s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 17.87764883041382s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.8803770542144775s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.6622774600982666s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.4198741912841797s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 69.91604661941528s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 2.3703882694244385s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 12.139052391052246s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 1.3244473934173584s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 61.55102777481079s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.7153940200805664s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.7169656753540039s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.2676992416381836s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 11.804733037948608s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.4500267505645752s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.020574569702148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.0007078647613525391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 0.00011372566223144531s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 117.32266116142273s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sgd took 1.1444091796875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sgd took 1208.635630607605s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.0006070137023925781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.28722691535949707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.02005910873413086s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 0.0007181167602539062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 3.600120544433594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sgd-resources took 5.118253946304321s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.5952193737030029s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.0005464553833007812s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Sider took 33.982142210006714s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Sider took 1.268531084060669s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 44.24614596366882s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 41.457611322402954s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 60.248008489608765s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.2708117961883545s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.156219482421875s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 1.220390796661377s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.3341808319091797s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 6.384191274642944s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.5678749084472656s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 60.26160192489624s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.2944662570953369s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 10.722676753997803s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.5801119804382324s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.2553884983062744s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.2834651470184326s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.2605602741241455s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 10.808547735214233s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Sider took 73.65065336227417s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.6784267425537109s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.3788883686065674s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.9425489902496338s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.3523285388946533s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.29039621353149414s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.4916110038757324s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.5043840408325195s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Sider took 118.54988145828247s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.44919705390930176s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.287198543548584s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.27298521995544434s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Sider took 17.39088463783264s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.8802473545074463s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.6723847389221191s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.48310089111328125s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Sider took 71.7228136062622s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Sider took 2.367313861846924s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Sider took 12.6195809841156s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Sider took 1.3021914958953857s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Sider took 61.551908016204834s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.7156810760498047s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.7368423938751221s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.2746317386627197s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Sider took 12.150731325149536s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Sider took 1.405874490737915s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.020659923553466797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Sider took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Sider took 0.0007009506225585938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Sider took 4.7206878662109375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Sider took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-sider took 1076.6538248062134s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.000263214111328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.7251672744750977s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.020070552825927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 0.0007433891296386719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::SPIKE took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-spike took 5.227479696273804s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for bio2rdf-taxon took 7.82012939453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.0005838871002197266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.2522099018096924s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.02023172378540039s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for bio2rdf-taxon took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for bio2rdf-taxon took 0.0007138252258300781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for bio2rdf-taxon took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for bio2rdf-taxon took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-taxon took 3.5279669761657715s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.5702276229858398s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.0006096363067626953s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 38.62846350669861s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 1.2347979545593262s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 43.8898651599884s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 45.81272315979004s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 60.26326060295105s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.2794015407562256s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.14654064178466797s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 1.0272390842437744s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.35194849967956543s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 6.382212400436401s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.48321104049682617s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 60.250545501708984s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.31106066703796387s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 11.131469011306763s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.5790464878082275s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.28423452377319336s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.28220152854919434s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.2539489269256592s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 10.626862287521362s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 74.44807291030884s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.30122971534729004s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.3888075351715088s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 1.1406924724578857s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.33627772331237793s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.267383337020874s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.5350806713104248s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.5353057384490967s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 119.24428844451904s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 78.80513954162598s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.6449778079986572s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.29782962799072266s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.29622840881347656s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 18.631024837493896s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.8860507011413574s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.6709342002868652s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.3975503444671631s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 70.40365934371948s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 2.4266064167022705s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 11.283792972564697s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 1.3431224822998047s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 61.60129451751709s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.7288188934326172s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.4603281021118164s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.2780587673187256s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 11.971906661987305s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.5187366008758545s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.020356178283691406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.0007560253143310547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 0.0001068115234375s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 91.66446447372437s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Taxonomy took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-taxonomy took 1245.9643721580505s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.14578652381896973s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.0006496906280517578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.2627425193786621s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.01996302604675293s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 0.0007154941558837891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Wikipathways took 1.239776611328125e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-wikipathways took 18.88254737854004s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.605827808380127s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.0006113052368164062s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 34.14086079597473s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 1.2215125560760498s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 44.22857666015625s
Interoperability | New terms check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 41.42346692085266s
Versatility | Languages check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 60.25714993476868s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.277554988861084s
Security | Check HTTPS for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.14462018013000488s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 1.1012687683105469s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.33634328842163086s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 6.406888961791992s
License | MR license check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.572622537612915s
License | HR license check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 60.23755216598511s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.26360559463500977s
Understandability | Number of label check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 10.376152753829956s
Understandability | URI regex check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.5653958320617676s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.259033203125s
Verifiability | Authors check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.25237298011779785s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.2589268684387207s
Performance | Throughput check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 11.001426696777344s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 75.39081239700317s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.6940395832061768s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.3597745895385742s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.8166933059692383s
Interlinking | skos check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.3417396545410156s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.27503514289855957s
Currency | Creation date check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.5240249633789062s
Currency | Modification date check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.5096750259399414s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 120.96182107925415s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 34.65718698501587s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.39849090576171875s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.2858283519744873s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.28633546829223633s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 18.47477078437805s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.8872859477996826s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.6581845283508301s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.5129897594451904s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 71.09204196929932s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 2.455522060394287s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 12.074256420135498s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 1.3014497756958008s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 61.58610510826111s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.7170815467834473s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.7420849800109863s
Security | Sign check for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.28564023971557617s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 11.348844051361084s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.5595989227294922s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.020323991775512695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 0.0007407665252685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 8.320808410644531e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 98.82320547103882s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bio2RDF::Wormbase took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bio2rdf-wormbase took 1204.3040046691895s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biografías y Vidas took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biografías y Vidas took 0.00025773048400878906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biografías y Vidas took 0.2766094207763672s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biografías y Vidas took 0.019926071166992188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biografías y Vidas took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biografías y Vidas took 0.0007004737854003906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biografías y Vidas took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biografías y Vidas took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biografiasyvidas took 3.658409833908081s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.2549889087677002s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.000461578369140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.27961301803588867s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.02017068862915039s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 0.0007190704345703125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 8.273124694824219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biographical Directory of the United States Congress took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biographical-directory-of-the-united-states-congress took 4.394596338272095s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.000125885009765625s
Availability | VoID file availability check for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.0002551078796386719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.28024888038635254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.02043008804321289s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 2.2649765014648438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 0.0007231235504150391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (RKBExplorer) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biolit took 2.920382022857666s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 6.008148193359375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.0006728172302246094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.27779579162597656s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.02031087875366211s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 0.0007402896881103516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 3.743171691894531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioLOD for Protein Data Bank Japan took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biolod-pdb took 8.286662340164185s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioModels RDF took 0.6680588722229004s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioModels RDF took 0.00033974647521972656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioModels RDF took 0.28189802169799805s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioModels RDF took 0.020131826400756836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioModels RDF took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioModels RDF took 0.0007224082946777344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioModels RDF took 3.552436828613281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioModels RDF took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biomodels-rdf took 4.186304092407227s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 2.837322473526001s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.00067901611328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.27158021926879883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.02027273178100586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 0.0007333755493164062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO 1.5) took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Biop took 7.636256456375122s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 5.412101745605469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.0005605220794677734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.2453746795654297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.021023988723754883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 0.0007331371307373047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 3.4809112548828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Covid19 Impact on Banking ontology (Covid19-IBO) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bioportal took 2.415804624557495s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amphibian gross anatomy took 5.435943603515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0005106925964355469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.25934743881225586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.02052021026611328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amphibian gross anatomy took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0007472038269042969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amphibian gross anatomy took 0.0006322860717773438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amphibian gross anatomy took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aao took 3.1899750232696533s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.0005402565002441406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.2652277946472168s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.020235061645507812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.0007648468017578125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 0.00029850006103515625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ABA Adult Mouse Brain took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aba took 3.6230037212371826s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.0005414485931396484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.28249073028564453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.020500659942626953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.0007507801055908203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 0.0014967918395996094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cancer Research and Management ACGT Master Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-acgt took 2.712810516357422s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Animal natural history and life history took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Animal natural history and life history took 0.0005276203155517578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Animal natural history and life history took 0.24598097801208496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Animal natural history and life history took 0.020290136337280273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Animal natural history and life history took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Animal natural history and life history took 0.0007290840148925781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Animal natural history and life history took 0.0003726482391357422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Animal natural history and life history took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-adw took 2.6330196857452393s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.0005741119384765625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.2914924621582031s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.03181767463684082s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.0014564990997314453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 0.00070953369140625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Anatomical Entity Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aeo took 2.737478256225586s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0006549358367919922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.2745330333709717s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.020496368408203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0007550716400146484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 0.0009791851043701172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Adverse Event Reporting ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-aero took 2.62394118309021s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for AI/RHEUM took 5.602836608886719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for AI/RHEUM took 0.00044727325439453125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for AI/RHEUM took 0.26407766342163086s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for AI/RHEUM took 0.020133256912231445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for AI/RHEUM took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for AI/RHEUM took 0.0007185935974121094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for AI/RHEUM took 0.00040459632873535156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for AI/RHEUM took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-air took 2.5822291374206543s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amino Acid took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amino Acid took 0.0004742145538330078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amino Acid took 0.27704763412475586s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amino Acid took 0.020860910415649414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amino Acid took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amino Acid took 0.0008490085601806641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amino Acid took 0.0002884864807128906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amino Acid took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-amino-acid took 2.678316116333008s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.0005259513854980469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.2783200740814209s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.027093172073364258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 1.4543533325195312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.0011248588562011719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 0.00042438507080078125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ascomycete phenotype ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-apo took 2.6333749294281006s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for African Traditional Medicine took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for African Traditional Medicine took 0.0004792213439941406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for African Traditional Medicine took 0.2544515132904053s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for African Traditional Medicine took 0.020445585250854492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for African Traditional Medicine took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for African Traditional Medicine took 0.0007269382476806641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for African Traditional Medicine took 0.00023221969604492188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for African Traditional Medicine took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-atmo took 2.6865956783294678s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Amphibian taxonomy took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.0005216598510742188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.25287699699401855s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.020306110382080078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Amphibian taxonomy took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Amphibian taxonomy took 0.0007183551788330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Amphibian taxonomy took 8.630752563476562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Amphibian taxonomy took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ato took 2.643649101257324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioAssay Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0004928112030029297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioAssay Ontology took 0.2850680351257324s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioAssay Ontology took 0.020175457000732422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioAssay Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0007369518280029297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioAssay Ontology took 0.0012969970703125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioAssay Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bao took 2.694213628768921s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 5.364418029785156e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.0004787445068359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.24669289588928223s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.020487070083618164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.0007627010345458984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 0.0003743171691894531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basic Vertebrate Anatomy took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-basic-vertebrate-gross-anatomy took 2.685323715209961s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.0005228519439697266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.26441311836242676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.02057814598083496s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.0007565021514892578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 0.000335693359375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Breast Cancer Grading Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bcgo took 2.6212499141693115s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.0005192756652832031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.26968812942504883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.020479679107666016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.000759124755859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 0.001386880874633789s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bone Dysplasia Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bdo took 2.646279811859131s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Basic Formal Ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0005021095275878906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.27147698402404785s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.02065443992614746s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Basic Formal Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0007336139678955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Basic Formal Ontology took 0.0004863739013671875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Basic Formal Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bfo took 2.6000747680664062s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bleeding History Phenotype took 4.696846008300781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.0005164146423339844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.2612895965576172s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.02028942108154297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bleeding History Phenotype took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.0007121562957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bleeding History Phenotype took 0.0007367134094238281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bleeding History Phenotype took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bho took 2.647036552429199s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bilateria anatomy took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bilateria anatomy took 0.0004775524139404297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bilateria anatomy took 0.26558661460876465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bilateria anatomy took 0.020430564880371094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bilateria anatomy took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bilateria anatomy took 0.000736236572265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bilateria anatomy took 0.0004477500915527344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bilateria anatomy took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bila took 2.6241209506988525s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BIRNLex took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BIRNLex took 0.0005319118499755859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BIRNLex took 0.2715919017791748s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BIRNLex took 0.020591259002685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BIRNLex took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BIRNLex took 0.0007522106170654297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BIRNLex took 0.0015120506286621094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BIRNLex took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-birnlex took 2.600386142730713s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.00047016143798828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.2871975898742676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.02036118507385254s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Regulation Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007388591766357422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007493495941162109s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Regulation Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bootstrep took 2.6067750453948975s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioPAX took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioPAX took 0.0005648136138916016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioPAX took 0.2622206211090088s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioPAX took 0.0216064453125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioPAX took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioPAX took 0.0007469654083251953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioPAX took 0.00011467933654785156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioPAX took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bp took 2.6787219047546387s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.0005381107330322266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.293154239654541s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.020467758178710938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.0007338523864746094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 0.0003287792205810547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biomedical Resource Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bro_x1 took 2.645364284515381s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Spatial Ontology took 0.0006611347198486328s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Spatial Ontology took 0.0004999637603759766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Spatial Ontology took 0.25275683403015137s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Spatial Ontology took 0.020277023315429688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Spatial Ontology took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Spatial Ontology took 0.000990152359008789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Spatial Ontology took 0.0002529621124267578s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Spatial Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bspo took 2.5560379028320312s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioTop took 7.033348083496094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioTop took 0.0004999637603759766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioTop took 0.2574145793914795s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioTop took 0.020440340042114258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioTop took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioTop took 0.0007510185241699219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioTop took 0.0006778240203857422s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioTop took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bt took 2.6136226654052734s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 5.125999450683594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.0005695819854736328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.28391242027282715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.02040696144104004s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.0007240772247314453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 0.0008711814880371094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BRENDA tissue / enzyme source took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-bto took 2.6534478664398193s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0005524158477783203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.3132190704345703s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.02037835121154785s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0007495880126953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 0.0018630027770996094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cancer Chemoprevention Ontology took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-canco took 3.148965358734131s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CAO took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CAO took 0.0005795955657958984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CAO took 0.2583034038543701s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CAO took 0.020496368408203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CAO took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CAO took 0.0007481575012207031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CAO took 0.0006232261657714844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CAO took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cao took 2.6984972953796387s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CareLex took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CareLex took 0.0005648136138916016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CareLex took 0.2846035957336426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CareLex took 0.02032184600830078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CareLex took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CareLex took 0.0007307529449462891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CareLex took 4.8160552978515625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CareLex took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-carelex took 2.7015438079833984s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell Cycle Ontology took 4.9591064453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.0004944801330566406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.2716488838195801s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.020032644271850586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell Cycle Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.0007147789001464844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell Cycle Ontology took 0.0007982254028320312s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell Cycle Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cco took 2.6109519004821777s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.0005502700805664062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.2756078243255615s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.020153284072875977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.0007898807525634766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 0.0002601146697998047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Comparative Data Analysis Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cdao took 2.624307632446289s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical entities of biological interest took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0005183219909667969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.27840423583984375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.020131826400756836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical entities of biological interest took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0007188320159912109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical entities of biological interest took 0.0007836818695068359s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical entities of biological interest took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-chebi took 2.632554054260254s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.0005123615264892578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.28037476539611816s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.020258188247680664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.0007240772247314453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 0.00024628639221191406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Systems Chemical Biology/Chemogenomics took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-chem2bio2owl took 2.61647367477417s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical Information Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0004987716674804688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.26771044731140137s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.020366430282592773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical Information Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0007274150848388672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical Information Ontology took 0.0007534027099609375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical Information Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cheminf took 2.563997507095337s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell type took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell type took 0.0005638599395751953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell type took 0.2684793472290039s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell type took 0.020320653915405273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell type took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell type took 0.0007271766662597656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell type took 0.00038623809814453125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell type took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cl took 2.588651657104492s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell Line Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell Line Ontology took 0.000518798828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell Line Ontology took 0.25856614112854004s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell Line Ontology took 0.020144224166870117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell Line Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell Line Ontology took 0.00072479248046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell Line Ontology took 0.0007975101470947266s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell Line Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-clo took 2.618032693862915s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.0005791187286376953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.2780730724334717s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.020896434783935547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.0007421970367431641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 0.0001971721649169922s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Clinical Measurement Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cmo took 2.647634983062744s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 9.608268737792969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.0004961490631103516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.2544081211090088s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.020917654037475586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.0007436275482177734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 0.00021076202392578125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Computational Neuroscience Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cno took 2.513533353805542s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Wheat trait took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Wheat trait took 0.0005221366882324219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Wheat trait took 0.2685701847076416s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Wheat trait took 0.021486520767211914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Wheat trait took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Wheat trait took 0.0007750988006591797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Wheat trait took 5.6743621826171875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Wheat trait took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-co_wheat took 2.7187108993530273s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cognitive Atlas took 8.463859558105469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cognitive Atlas took 0.0005195140838623047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cognitive Atlas took 0.24209976196289062s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cognitive Atlas took 0.02083444595336914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cognitive Atlas took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cognitive Atlas took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cognitive Atlas took 0.00036334991455078125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cognitive Atlas took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cogat took 2.674999475479126s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 5.3882598876953125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.0005588531494140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.27996087074279785s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.02071070671081543s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.000743865966796875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 0.0008170604705810547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cognitive Paradigm Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cogpo took 2.626551628112793s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Current Procedural Terminology took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0005037784576416016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.2836611270904541s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.020449399948120117s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Current Procedural Terminology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0007607936859130859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Current Procedural Terminology took 0.0004298686981201172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Current Procedural Terminology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cpt took 2.735408067703247s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.0004878044128417969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.30971646308898926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.0206758975982666s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.0009810924530029297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 0.0018839836120605469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CRISP Thesaurus, 2006 took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-csp took 3.099459171295166s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for COSTART took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for COSTART took 0.0006361007690429688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for COSTART took 0.2674543857574463s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for COSTART took 0.020339012145996094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for COSTART took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for COSTART took 0.0007834434509277344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for COSTART took 0.0009765625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for COSTART took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-cst took 2.6917614936828613s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.0005099773406982422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.2645094394683838s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.020179271697998047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.0007214546203613281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 0.0004980564117431641s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ctcae took 2.663872480392456s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0004999637603759766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.2615926265716553s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.020423412322998047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0007419586181640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 0.0004444122314453125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ctx took 2.5743844509124756s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dendritic cell took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dendritic cell took 0.0005612373352050781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dendritic cell took 0.2517116069793701s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dendritic cell took 0.02023601531982422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dendritic cell took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dendritic cell took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dendritic cell took 0.0002918243408203125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dendritic cell took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-dc_cl took 2.716517925262451s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.0005505084991455078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.26317715644836426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.02062249183654785s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.000926971435546875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 0.00010371208190917969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Dictyostelium discoideum anatomy took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ddanat took 2.6152379512786865s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.0005576610565185547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.25980210304260254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.0209195613861084s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.0007672309875488281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 0.0009546279907226562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Drug Discovery Investigations took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ddi took 2.5972464084625244s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Diagnostic Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.0005562305450439453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.24790143966674805s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.020394325256347656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Diagnostic Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Diagnostic Ontology took 0.0007293224334716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Diagnostic Ontology took 8.225440979003906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Diagnostic Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-diagnosticont took 2.577204942703247s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 5.602836608886719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.0005083084106445312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.27787256240844727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.02026844024658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.0007109642028808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 0.00016307830810546875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for DIKB-Evidence-Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-dikb-evidence took 2.647796869277954s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human disease ontology took 4.839897155761719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human disease ontology took 0.000518798828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human disease ontology took 0.28147172927856445s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human disease ontology took 0.02038097381591797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human disease ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human disease ontology took 0.0007312297821044922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human disease ontology took 0.000640869140625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human disease ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-doid took 2.7117316722869873s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Electrocardiography Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.0005061626434326172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.2962656021118164s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.02021479606628418s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Electrocardiography Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.00072479248046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Electrocardiography Ontology took 0.0008141994476318359s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Electrocardiography Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ecg took 2.599734306335449s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Evidence codes took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Evidence codes took 0.0004956722259521484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Evidence codes took 0.2657332420349121s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Evidence codes took 0.020697832107543945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Evidence codes took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Evidence codes took 0.0007376670837402344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Evidence codes took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Evidence codes took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-eco took 2.6509737968444824s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Experimental Factor Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.0005147457122802734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.31662631034851074s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.023201704025268555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Experimental Factor Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.0008916854858398438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Experimental Factor Ontology took 0.001886606216430664s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Experimental Factor Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-efo took 3.051964521408081s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.00052642822265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.2606163024902344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.020479440689086914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0007269382476806641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 0.0011763572692871094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, timed version took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehda took 2.6668238639831543s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.000514984130859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.24667024612426758s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.02023911476135254s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0007405281066894531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 0.0006990432739257812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehdaa took 2.676971197128296s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0005269050598144531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.28689098358154297s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.020168304443359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0007228851318359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 0.0005242824554443359s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human developmental anatomy, abstract version, v2 took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ehdaa2 took 2.564804792404175s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.0005018711090087891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.2949342727661133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.020609140396118164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 0.0008358955383300781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse gross anatomy and development took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-emap took 2.619091510772705s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Environment Ontology took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Environment Ontology took 0.00047087669372558594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Environment Ontology took 0.2680213451385498s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Environment Ontology took 0.020477771759033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Environment Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Environment Ontology took 0.0007658004760742188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Environment Ontology took 0.00040149688720703125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Environment Ontology took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-envo took 2.626763105392456s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant environmental conditions took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant environmental conditions took 0.00048065185546875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant environmental conditions took 0.2533223628997803s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant environmental conditions took 0.02124309539794922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant environmental conditions took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant environmental conditions took 0.0007584095001220703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant environmental conditions took 0.00032401084899902344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant environmental conditions took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-eo took 2.6246747970581055s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 4.887580871582031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.0004947185516357422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.25160717964172363s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.020355939865112305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.0007808208465576172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 0.0012094974517822266s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cardiac Electrophysiology Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ep took 2.6466853618621826s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Epilepsy took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Epilepsy took 0.0004951953887939453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Epilepsy took 0.269895076751709s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Epilepsy took 0.02054619789123535s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Epilepsy took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Epilepsy took 0.0008175373077392578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Epilepsy took 0.0001399517059326172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Epilepsy took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-epileponto took 2.7294352054595947s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for eagle-i research resource ontology took 8.082389831542969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.00039458274841308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.27986836433410645s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.020284175872802734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for eagle-i research resource ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.0007436275482177734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for eagle-i research resource ontology took 0.0011310577392578125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for eagle-i research resource ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ero took 2.60615873336792s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 4.839897155761719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0005533695220947266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.2599375247955322s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.02094292640686035s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 1.7404556274414062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0014181137084960938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 0.0013418197631835938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for eVOC (Expressed Sequence Annotation for Humans) took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ev took 2.5301105976104736s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ExO took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ExO took 0.0005674362182617188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ExO took 0.2607278823852539s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ExO took 0.020436525344848633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ExO took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ExO took 0.0007193088531494141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ExO took 0.00027871131896972656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ExO took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-exo took 2.6824324131011963s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fungal gross anatomy took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.0004935264587402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.2661430835723877s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.020273447036743164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fungal gross anatomy took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.0007541179656982422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fungal gross anatomy took 0.00011420249938964844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fungal gross anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fao took 2.561276435852051s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biological imaging methods took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biological imaging methods took 0.0004775524139404297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biological imaging methods took 0.26708173751831055s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biological imaging methods took 0.020119667053222656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biological imaging methods took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biological imaging methods took 0.0007474422454833984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biological imaging methods took 0.00019097328186035156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biological imaging methods took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbbi took 2.596872329711914s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Drosophila gross anatomy took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.0005106925964355469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.26990246772766113s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.02035808563232422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Drosophila gross anatomy took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Drosophila gross anatomy took 0.0006556510925292969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Drosophila gross anatomy took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbbt took 2.6424131393432617s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.0005304813385009766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.25627803802490234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.020232200622558594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.0007791519165039062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 0.00042891502380371094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for FlyBase Controlled Vocabulary took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbcv took 2.6349000930786133s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Drosophila development took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Drosophila development took 0.000522613525390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Drosophila development took 0.29108309745788574s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Drosophila development took 0.021346330642700195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Drosophila development took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Drosophila development took 0.0009644031524658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Drosophila development took 5.245208740234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Drosophila development took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbdv took 2.648383140563965s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fly taxonomy took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fly taxonomy took 0.0005028247833251953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fly taxonomy took 0.24068284034729004s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fly taxonomy took 0.020165443420410156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fly taxonomy took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fly taxonomy took 0.0007340908050537109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fly taxonomy took 0.0003600120544433594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fly taxonomy took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fbsp took 2.6684086322784424s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 7.605552673339844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0005209445953369141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.2522854804992676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.02036285400390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0007255077362060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 0.0002155303955078125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for FDA Medical Devices (2010) took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fda-meddevice took 2.6110823154449463s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Family Health History Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Family Health History Ontology took 0.0005626678466796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Family Health History Ontology took 0.27028322219848633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Family Health History Ontology took 0.020403385162353516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Family Health History Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Family Health History Ontology took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Family Health History Ontology took 0.00041222572326660156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Family Health History Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fhho took 2.636568069458008s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Influenza Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Influenza Ontology took 0.0004773139953613281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Influenza Ontology took 0.2704317569732666s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Influenza Ontology took 0.020076274871826172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Influenza Ontology took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Influenza Ontology took 0.0007476806640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Influenza Ontology took 0.0010178089141845703s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Influenza Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-flu took 2.6279971599578857s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.0005562305450439453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.25956082344055176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.020377635955810547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 0.0007197856903076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 6.008148193359375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Foundational Model of Anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fma took 2.6617591381073s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.0007824897766113281s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.0004863739013671875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.2380375862121582s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.020194530487060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.0007445812225341797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 0.00012493133544921875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-fypo took 2.6180832386016846s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for GeoSpecies Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.0005366802215576172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.2887740135192871s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.020479679107666016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for GeoSpecies Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for GeoSpecies Ontology took 0.0007107257843017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for GeoSpecies Ontology took 8.487701416015625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for GeoSpecies Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-geospecies took 2.6615865230560303s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for General Formal Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for General Formal Ontology took 0.0005724430084228516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for General Formal Ontology took 0.264387845993042s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for General Formal Ontology took 0.02047419548034668s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for General Formal Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for General Formal Ontology took 0.0007202625274658203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for General Formal Ontology took 0.0001690387725830078s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for General Formal Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gfo took 2.7029263973236084s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 7.724761962890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0005030632019042969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.246246337890625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.020363807678222656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0007255077362060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 0.0005884170532226562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for General Formal Ontology: Biology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gfo-bio took 2.627009391784668s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Ontology Extension took 5.054473876953125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0006384849548339844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.2685849666595459s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.02088022232055664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Ontology Extension took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0007328987121582031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Ontology Extension took 0.0008516311645507812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Ontology Extension took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-go_x1 took 2.6487324237823486s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Ontology took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Ontology took 0.0005316734313964844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Ontology took 0.2653636932373047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Ontology took 0.020687103271484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Ontology took 0.0007848739624023438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Ontology took 0.0009205341339111328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-go_x2 took 2.558866024017334s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cereal Plant Development took 6.914138793945312e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cereal Plant Development took 0.0005357265472412109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cereal Plant Development took 0.26895689964294434s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cereal Plant Development took 0.020735740661621094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cereal Plant Development took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cereal Plant Development took 0.0007367134094238281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cereal Plant Development took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cereal Plant Development took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro took 2.5987038612365723s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.0005714893341064453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.26353931427001953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.02150559425354004s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.0007281303405761719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 0.0004603862762451172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cereal plant gross anatomy took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro_x1 took 2.6073691844940186s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.00052642822265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.2657444477081299s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.020559072494506836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Gene Regulation Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007419586181640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Gene Regulation Ontology took 0.0007441043853759766s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Gene Regulation Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-gro_x2 took 2.6675798892974854s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0006737709045410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.2587265968322754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.020661354064941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0007498264312744141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 0.0005793571472167969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hao took 2.6619138717651367s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HCPCS took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HCPCS took 0.0005259513854980469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HCPCS took 0.2645604610443115s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HCPCS took 0.020316600799560547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HCPCS took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HCPCS took 0.000728607177734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HCPCS took 0.00022840499877929688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HCPCS took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hcpcs took 2.624321937561035s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Health Level Seven took 6.937980651855469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Health Level Seven took 0.0005357265472412109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Health Level Seven took 0.2724311351776123s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Health Level Seven took 0.020601511001586914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Health Level Seven took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Health Level Seven took 0.0007584095001220703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Health Level Seven took 0.0012955665588378906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Health Level Seven took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hl7 took 2.5519113540649414s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.00048804283142089844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.2812814712524414s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.020528078079223633s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.0007312297821044922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 0.0003819465637207031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HEALTH_INDICATORS took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hlth_indics took 2.5499022006988525s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.0005447864532470703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.25038790702819824s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.02124619483947754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 0.0008814334869384766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of homology and related concepts in biology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hom took 2.5935776233673096s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HOM-HARVARD took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HOM-HARVARD took 0.0004892349243164062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HOM-HARVARD took 0.26865434646606445s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HOM-HARVARD took 0.020352840423583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HOM-HARVARD took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HOM-HARVARD took 0.0007135868072509766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HOM-HARVARD took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HOM-HARVARD took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hom_harvard took 2.6484339237213135s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Human Phenotype Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0004909038543701172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.2658545970916748s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.02043318748474121s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Human Phenotype Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0007243156433105469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Human Phenotype Ontology took 0.0006539821624755859s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Human Phenotype Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hp_x1 took 2.6665537357330322s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.0004792213439941406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.27097344398498535s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.02047896385192871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.0007176399230957031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 0.001041412353515625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Host Pathogen Interactions Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hpio took 2.5999367237091064s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for HUGO took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for HUGO took 0.0005438327789306641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for HUGO took 0.2804431915283203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for HUGO took 0.02050161361694336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for HUGO took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for HUGO took 0.0007085800170898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for HUGO took 7.748603820800781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for HUGO took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-hugo took 2.6974148750305176s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Information Artifact Ontology took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.0004858970642089844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.26320385932922363s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.02042102813720703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Information Artifact Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Information Artifact Ontology took 0.0006313323974609375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Information Artifact Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-iao took 2.9005658626556396s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD10 took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD10 took 0.0004937648773193359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD10 took 0.28261232376098633s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD10 took 0.020692825317382812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD10 took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD10 took 0.0009720325469970703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD10 took 0.0009102821350097656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD10 took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10 took 2.620655059814453s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD10CM took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD10CM took 0.0005602836608886719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD10CM took 0.2603297233581543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD10CM took 0.0204927921295166s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD10CM took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD10CM took 0.0007271766662597656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD10CM took 0.0006163120269775391s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD10CM took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10cm took 2.6296019554138184s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICD-10-PCS took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICD-10-PCS took 0.0005183219909667969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICD-10-PCS took 0.28615546226501465s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICD-10-PCS took 0.020488500595092773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICD-10-PCS took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICD-10-PCS took 0.0007290840148925781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICD-10-PCS took 0.00015211105346679688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICD-10-PCS took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd10pcs took 2.6160011291503906s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Diseases took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0005147457122802734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Diseases took 0.27519869804382324s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Diseases took 0.020265817642211914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Diseases took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0007152557373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Diseases took 0.0006718635559082031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Diseases took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icd9cm took 2.651050329208374s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0005559921264648438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.2874894142150879s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0203857421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0007171630859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 0.0004456043243408203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icf_x1 took 2.6242518424987793s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0004775524139404297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.2661881446838379s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.02087569236755371s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0007231235504150391s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 0.0012288093566894531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification for Nursing Practice took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icnp took 2.70320725440979s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for International Classification of Primary Care took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.0004968643188476562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.27134156227111816s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.020686864852905273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for International Classification of Primary Care took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.0007181167602539062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for International Classification of Primary Care took 0.0005464553833007812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for International Classification of Primary Care took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icpc took 2.7373135089874268s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICPC-2 PLUS took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0005288124084472656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.30057716369628906s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.020363807678222656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICPC-2 PLUS took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0007505416870117188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICPC-2 PLUS took 0.0008678436279296875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICPC-2 PLUS took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icpc2p took 2.68567156791687s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ICPS Network took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ICPS Network took 0.0004868507385253906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ICPS Network took 0.28777289390563965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ICPS Network took 0.020207881927490234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ICPS Network took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ICPS Network took 0.0007410049438476562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ICPS Network took 0.00022125244140625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ICPS Network took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-icps took 2.695932626724243s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Infectious Disease Ontology took 6.079673767089844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0006392002105712891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.24608850479125977s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.02142047882080078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Infectious Disease Ontology took 1.5020370483398438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0008935928344726562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Infectious Disease Ontology took 0.0010523796081542969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Infectious Disease Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ido took 2.6067748069763184s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brucellosis Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0004904270172119141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.2705707550048828s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.020313739776611328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brucellosis Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0007135868072509766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brucellosis Ontology took 0.0011305809020996094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brucellosis Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-idobru took 2.664682388305664s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Malaria Ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Malaria Ontology took 0.0005893707275390625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Malaria Ontology took 0.2746729850769043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Malaria Ontology took 0.020654678344726562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Malaria Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Malaria Ontology took 0.0007236003875732422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Malaria Ontology took 0.0013303756713867188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Malaria Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-idomal took 2.6517679691314697s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.00048828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.28076767921447754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.02029132843017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.0007174015045166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 0.0003066062927246094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Event (INOH pathway ontology) took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-iev took 2.62117075920105s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 9.965896606445312e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.0004930496215820312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.2690577507019043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.02080082893371582s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.0008459091186523438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 0.00018739700317382812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for IMGT-ONTOLOGY took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-imgt took 2.7574045658111572s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0004961490631103516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.26648902893066406s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.02088332176208496s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0010302066802978516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 0.0006492137908935547s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Molecule role (INOH Protein name/family name ontology) took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-imr took 2.596717119216919s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Interaction Network Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0005359649658203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.267427921295166s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.020973682403564453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Interaction Network Ontology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0007412433624267578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Interaction Network Ontology took 0.0007526874542236328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Interaction Network Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ino took 2.7023043632507324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Hewan Invertebrata took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.00039458274841308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.2794167995452881s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.02062678337097168s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Hewan Invertebrata took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Hewan Invertebrata took 0.0007181167602539062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Hewan Invertebrata took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Hewan Invertebrata took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-invertebrata took 2.6259067058563232s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for IxnO took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for IxnO took 0.0005574226379394531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for IxnO took 0.2831404209136963s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for IxnO took 0.021034717559814453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for IxnO took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for IxnO took 0.0007622241973876953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for IxnO took 0.00019931793212890625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for IxnO took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ixno took 2.63802433013916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SysMO-JERM took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SysMO-JERM took 0.0005078315734863281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SysMO-JERM took 0.2531445026397705s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SysMO-JERM took 0.020735740661621094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SysMO-JERM took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SysMO-JERM took 0.0007226467132568359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SysMO-JERM took 0.00039124488830566406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SysMO-JERM took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-jerm took 2.6607112884521484s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.0005476474761962891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.275681734085083s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.02062201499938965s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 0.0007343292236328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-kisao took 2.621748685836792s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Loggerhead nesting took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Loggerhead nesting took 0.0004899501800537109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Loggerhead nesting took 0.265887975692749s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Loggerhead nesting took 0.020527362823486328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Loggerhead nesting took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Loggerhead nesting took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Loggerhead nesting took 0.00020575523376464844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Loggerhead nesting took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lhn took 2.6246094703674316s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Lipid Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Lipid Ontology took 0.00048732757568359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Lipid Ontology took 0.25136446952819824s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Lipid Ontology took 0.02041339874267578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Lipid Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Lipid Ontology took 0.0007121562957763672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Lipid Ontology took 0.00019431114196777344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Lipid Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lipro took 2.6067941188812256s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 4.76837158203125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0005517005920410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.32743000984191895s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0204770565032959s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 0.0018422603607177734s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-lnc took 3.0608367919921875s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.0005590915679931641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.2799654006958008s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.020674467086791992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.000713348388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 0.0006475448608398438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse adult gross anatomy took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ma took 2.685551881790161s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Multiple alignment took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Multiple alignment took 0.0005018711090087891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Multiple alignment took 0.2587890625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Multiple alignment took 0.021026134490966797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Multiple alignment took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Multiple alignment took 0.0008108615875244141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Multiple alignment took 0.00024056434631347656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Multiple alignment took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mao took 2.5958776473999023s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Minimal anatomical terminology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0005331039428710938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.29782772064208984s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.020387887954711914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Minimal anatomical terminology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Minimal anatomical terminology took 0.0007104873657226562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Minimal anatomical terminology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mat took 2.643996000289917s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Breast tissue cell lines took 6.270408630371094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.0005583763122558594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.28026461601257324s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.02054572105407715s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Breast tissue cell lines took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.0007143020629882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Breast tissue cell lines took 0.00042700767517089844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Breast tissue cell lines took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mcbcc took 2.6153883934020996s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell line ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell line ontology took 0.0005292892456054688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell line ontology took 0.252765417098999s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell line ontology took 0.020203113555908203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell line ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell line ontology took 0.0007119178771972656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell line ontology took 0.0008366107940673828s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell line ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mccl took 2.6571366786956787s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cell line ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cell line ontology took 0.00048470497131347656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cell line ontology took 0.2775135040283203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cell line ontology took 0.0209805965423584s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cell line ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cell line ontology took 0.0007462501525878906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cell line ontology took 0.0014727115631103516s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cell line ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mccl_x1 took 2.615595579147339s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.0011293888092041016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.2740659713745117s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.020572900772094727s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.0007228851318359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 0.000232696533203125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MIxS Controlled Vocabularies took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mcv took 2.7205677032470703s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Master Drug Data Base took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Master Drug Data Base took 0.0005280971527099609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Master Drug Data Base took 0.254164457321167s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Master Drug Data Base took 0.020478010177612305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Master Drug Data Base took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Master Drug Data Base took 0.0007405281066894531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Master Drug Data Base took 0.00018262863159179688s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Master Drug Data Base took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mddb took 2.5689542293548584s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MedDRA took 0.0006124973297119141s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MedDRA took 0.0005180835723876953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MedDRA took 0.2711198329925537s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MedDRA took 0.020443439483642578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MedDRA took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MedDRA took 0.0007214546203613281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MedDRA took 0.0011208057403564453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MedDRA took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mdr took 2.6476848125457764s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.000553131103515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.2786140441894531s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.020472049713134766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0007386207580566406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 0.0009033679962158203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MedlinePlus Health Topics took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-medlineplus took 2.6383349895477295s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MeGO took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MeGO took 0.0005517005920410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MeGO took 0.236677885055542s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MeGO took 0.020462751388549805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MeGO took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MeGO took 0.0007252693176269531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MeGO took 0.00014400482177734375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MeGO took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mego took 2.6018881797790527s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 6.914138793945312e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0004699230194091797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.3027157783508301s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.02065753936767578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0007588863372802734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 0.0018150806427001953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MESH Thesaurus (OWL version) took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mesh-owl took 3.093419075012207s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mental Functioning Ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.0005857944488525391s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.26383090019226074s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.02059483528137207s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mental Functioning Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mental Functioning Ontology took 0.0006241798400878906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mental Functioning Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mf took 2.579725503921509s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0004849433898925781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.29431819915771484s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.020548343658447266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0007271766662597656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 0.0005550384521484375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Medaka fish anatomy and development took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mfo took 2.636152982711792s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Emotion Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Emotion Ontology took 0.0004963874816894531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Emotion Ontology took 0.2867732048034668s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Emotion Ontology took 0.020429134368896484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Emotion Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Emotion Ontology took 0.0007424354553222656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Emotion Ontology took 0.0007867813110351562s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Emotion Ontology took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mfoem took 2.653684616088867s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 5.91278076171875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.0004723072052001953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.2620351314544678s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.020421981811523438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.0007333755493164062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 0.00010466575622558594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MaHCO - An MHC Ontology took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mhc took 2.5893707275390625s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Protein-protein interaction took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0004703998565673828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Protein-protein interaction took 0.2697913646697998s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Protein-protein interaction took 0.020503520965576172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Protein-protein interaction took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0007257461547851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Protein-protein interaction took 0.0006656646728515625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Protein-protein interaction took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mi took 2.6414051055908203s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0005257129669189453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.27338695526123047s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.020095348358154297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0007116794586181641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 0.0006978511810302734s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mosquito insecticide resistance took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-miro took 2.6437392234802246s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Measurement Method Ontology took 4.696846008300781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.0005145072937011719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.2736482620239258s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.02158641815185547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Measurement Method Ontology took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.0006890296936035156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Measurement Method Ontology took 0.00013899803161621094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Measurement Method Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mmo took 2.573744535446167s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MGED Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MGED Ontology took 0.0005571842193603516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MGED Ontology took 0.25243091583251953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MGED Ontology took 0.02051687240600586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MGED Ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MGED Ontology took 0.0007169246673583984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MGED Ontology took 0.00037288665771484375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MGED Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mo took 2.616328001022339s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Protein modification took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Protein modification took 0.0005118846893310547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Protein modification took 0.27574706077575684s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Protein modification took 0.020852327346801758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Protein modification took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Protein modification took 0.0007252693176269531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Protein modification took 0.00021529197692871094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Protein modification took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mod took 2.6092302799224854s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mammalian phenotype took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0005311965942382812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mammalian phenotype took 0.27922940254211426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mammalian phenotype took 0.020412683486938477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mammalian phenotype took 1.239776611328125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0007128715515136719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mammalian phenotype took 0.0006716251373291016s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mammalian phenotype took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mp took 2.6325297355651855s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mouse pathology took 5.5789947509765625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mouse pathology took 0.000514984130859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mouse pathology took 0.25790953636169434s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mouse pathology took 0.02156352996826172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mouse pathology took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mouse pathology took 0.0007343292236328125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mouse pathology took 0.0005178451538085938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mouse pathology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mpath took 2.65976881980896s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mass spectrometry took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mass spectrometry took 0.0004906654357910156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mass spectrometry took 0.2662069797515869s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mass spectrometry took 0.021073341369628906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mass spectrometry took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mass spectrometry took 0.0007109642028808594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mass spectrometry took 0.00040411949157714844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mass spectrometry took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ms took 2.6529884338378906s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Medical Subject Headings took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0005526542663574219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Medical Subject Headings took 0.3013756275177002s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Medical Subject Headings took 0.020731449127197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Medical Subject Headings took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0007958412170410156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Medical Subject Headings took 0.0019011497497558594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Medical Subject Headings took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-msh took 3.081991195678711s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 6.842613220214844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.0006282329559326172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.2626028060913086s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.020540237426757812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.0007166862487792969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 0.00016808509826660156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Metathesaurus CPT Hierarchical Terms took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-mthch took 2.6791863441467285s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Natural Products Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Natural Products Ontology took 0.000476837158203125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Natural Products Ontology took 0.26111865043640137s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Natural Products Ontology took 0.02041316032409668s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Natural Products Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0007166862487792969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Natural Products Ontology took 0.0007798671722412109s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Natural Products Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-natpro took 2.6421236991882324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NCBI organismal classification took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NCBI organismal classification took 0.0005297660827636719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NCBI organismal classification took 0.264667272567749s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NCBI organismal classification took 0.020775318145751953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NCBI organismal classification took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NCBI organismal classification took 0.0007510185241699219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NCBI organismal classification took 0.0008111000061035156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NCBI organismal classification took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ncbitaxon took 2.6544675827026367s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NCI Thesaurus took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NCI Thesaurus took 0.0005078315734863281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NCI Thesaurus took 0.30181026458740234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NCI Thesaurus took 0.020517587661743164s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NCI Thesaurus took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NCI Thesaurus took 0.0007166862487792969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NCI Thesaurus took 0.0019791126251220703s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NCI Thesaurus took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ncit took 3.081303596496582s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for National Drug Data File took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for National Drug Data File took 0.000583648681640625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for National Drug Data File took 0.25627827644348145s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for National Drug Data File took 0.020621061325073242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for National Drug Data File took 1.5974044799804688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for National Drug Data File took 0.0006909370422363281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for National Drug Data File took 0.0006260871887207031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for National Drug Data File took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nddf took 2.6004085540771484s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for National Drug File took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for National Drug File took 0.0005784034729003906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for National Drug File took 0.28881359100341797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for National Drug File took 0.02080225944519043s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for National Drug File took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for National Drug File took 0.0007300376892089844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for National Drug File took 0.0012302398681640625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for National Drug File took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ndfrt took 2.617220878601074s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 4.363059997558594e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.0013763904571533203s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.2558557987213135s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.02077770233154297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.0007436275482177734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 0.0011553764343261719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nemo_x1 took 2.709367275238037s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.000507354736328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.28517627716064453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.020593881607055664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0007238388061523438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 0.0006508827209472656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neomark Oral Cancer Ontology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-neomark took 2.741955518722534s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.0005314350128173828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.28525280952453613s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.02103734016418457s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.0007522106170654297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 0.00017976760864257812s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neomark Oral Cancer-Centred Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-neomarkontology took 2.7031822204589844s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIFSTD took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIFSTD took 0.0005397796630859375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIFSTD took 0.3266165256500244s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIFSTD took 0.020594358444213867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIFSTD took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIFSTD took 0.0007107257843017578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIFSTD took 0.0018613338470458984s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIFSTD took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif took 3.0511019229888916s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIF Cell took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIF Cell took 0.0006279945373535156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIF Cell took 0.251373291015625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIF Cell took 0.02039337158203125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIF Cell took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIF Cell took 0.0007266998291015625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIF Cell took 0.001318216323852539s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIF Cell took 1.5497207641601562e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif_cell took 2.582151412963867s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NIF Dysfunction took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NIF Dysfunction took 0.0005402565002441406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NIF Dysfunction took 0.26341700553894043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NIF Dysfunction took 0.020775794982910156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NIF Dysfunction took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NIF Dysfunction took 0.0007390975952148438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NIF Dysfunction took 0.00138092041015625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NIF Dysfunction took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nif_dysfunction took 2.657838821411133s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0004944801330566406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.28598570823669434s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.02044391632080078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0007131099700927734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 0.0005524158477783203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Neural-Immune Gene Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nigo took 2.632559299468994s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0005204677581787109s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.25537848472595215s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.02031254768371582s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0007152557373046875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 0.0005533695220947266s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NMR-instrument specific component of metabolomics investigations took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nmr took 2.6115293502807617s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.0005333423614501953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.28556180000305176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.020430803298950195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.0009922981262207031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 0.00015282630920410156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Non Randomized Controlled Trials Ontology took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-nonrctontology took 2.695523738861084s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for NanoParticle Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.0005347728729248047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.25925731658935547s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.020524978637695312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for NanoParticle Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.0007314682006835938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for NanoParticle Ontology took 0.0011773109436035156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for NanoParticle Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-npo took 2.5928173065185547s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0004916191101074219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.2770688533782959s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.020419597625732422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0007190704345703125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 0.0007152557373046875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oae took 2.573094606399536s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0004968643188476562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.2704613208770752s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.020679950714111328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0007460117340087891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 0.0014672279357910156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Biomedical Investigations took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-obi took 2.6301238536834717s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for OBOE took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for OBOE took 0.0005152225494384766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for OBOE took 0.2645576000213623s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for OBOE took 0.02073359489440918s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for OBOE took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for OBOE took 0.0007150173187255859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for OBOE took 0.00011038780212402344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for OBOE took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oboe took 2.596599578857422s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for OBOE SBC took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for OBOE SBC took 0.0005044937133789062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for OBOE SBC took 0.26639890670776367s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for OBOE SBC took 0.020604848861694336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for OBOE SBC took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for OBOE SBC took 0.0007486343383789062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for OBOE SBC took 0.0007696151733398438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for OBOE SBC took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-oboe-sbc took 2.5404720306396484s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 5.173683166503906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0005450248718261719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.27335405349731445s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.021975040435791016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0007228851318359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 0.0005791187286376953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ocre took 2.662458896636963s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0005576610565185547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.2629706859588623s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0205843448638916s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0007245540618896484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 0.0008306503295898438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for disease genetic investigation took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-odgi took 2.606724977493286s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0005586147308349609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.26821231842041016s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.02062368392944336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0007138252258300781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 0.0008847713470458984s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Genetic Interval took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogi took 2.6226868629455566s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.000579833984375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.2624490261077881s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.020721912384033203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.0007157325744628906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 0.0002925395965576172s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Glucose Metabolism Disorder took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogmd took 2.719252109527588s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for General Medical Science took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0005884170532226562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.3250577449798584s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.02086043357849121s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for General Medical Science took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0007190704345703125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for General Medical Science took 0.0006623268127441406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for General Medical Science took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ogms took 2.7653985023498535s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0006651878356933594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.25441694259643555s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.021344661712646484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 1.6927719116210938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.0011081695556640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 0.00138092041015625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omim took 2.7227792739868164s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.0004928112030029297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.28264355659484863s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.020446062088012695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.0007238388061523438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 0.0003781318664550781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for MicroRNA Target Prediction took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omit took 2.639894962310791s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.00023794174194335938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.2554469108581543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.02055978775024414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.0007314682006835938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 0.0006098747253417969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Medically Related Social Entities took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-omrse took 2.410355567932129s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of Data Mining took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.00048232078552246094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.2810180187225342s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.02057361602783203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of Data Mining took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.0007941722869873047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of Data Mining took 0.0008335113525390625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of Data Mining took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontodm took 2.6723759174346924s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 5.245208740234375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.00048041343688964844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.27527713775634766s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.020652055740356445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.0007700920104980469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 0.00024628639221191406s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology of General Purpose Datatypes took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontodt took 2.5731663703918457s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.00048041343688964844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.2781689167022705s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.020432233810424805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0007188320159912109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 0.0006086826324462891s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Orphanet Ontology of Rare Diseases took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ontoorpha took 2.5561928749084473s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0004737377166748047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.26154065132141113s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.020290613174438477s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0007531642913818359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 0.0009527206420898438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Ontology for Parasite LifeCycle took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-opl took 2.6216845512390137s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Phenotypic quality took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Phenotypic quality took 0.00048732757568359375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Phenotypic quality took 0.2515864372253418s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Phenotypic quality took 0.020287752151489258s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Phenotypic quality took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Phenotypic quality took 0.0007271766662597656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Phenotypic quality took 0.0008869171142578125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Phenotypic quality took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pato took 2.6082370281219482s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physician Data Query took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physician Data Query took 0.0004715919494628906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physician Data Query took 0.2792055606842041s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physician Data Query took 0.020339488983154297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physician Data Query took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physician Data Query took 0.0007600784301757812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physician Data Query took 0.0008165836334228516s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physician Data Query took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pdq took 2.6804990768432617s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Pediatric Terminology took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0004639625549316406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Pediatric Terminology took 0.2711787223815918s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Pediatric Terminology took 0.020377397537231445s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Pediatric Terminology took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0007243156433105469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Pediatric Terminology took 0.0008184909820556641s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Pediatric Terminology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pedterm took 2.584677219390869s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 8.845329284667969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.0005064010620117188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.2663760185241699s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.020302534103393555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.0007138252258300781s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 0.00019431114196777344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Parasite Experiment Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-peo took 2.606015682220459s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PHARE took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PHARE took 0.000492095947265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PHARE took 0.2821321487426758s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PHARE took 0.02067399024963379s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PHARE took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PHARE took 0.0007188320159912109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PHARE took 0.0006306171417236328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PHARE took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-phare took 2.585665225982666s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PKO_Re took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PKO_Re took 0.0004506111145019531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PKO_Re took 0.2802548408508301s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PKO_Re took 0.020390748977661133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PKO_Re took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PKO_Re took 0.0007259845733642578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PKO_Re took 0.0001709461212158203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PKO_Re took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pko took 2.6416921615600586s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PMA 2010 took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PMA 2010 took 0.0005280971527099609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PMA 2010 took 0.25481295585632324s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PMA 2010 took 0.02057671546936035s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PMA 2010 took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PMA 2010 took 0.0007293224334716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PMA 2010 took 0.0009529590606689453s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PMA 2010 took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pma took 2.675060272216797s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.00045561790466308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.26778578758239746s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.020314931869506836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.0007510185241699219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 0.00018143653869628906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pmr took 2.538961410522461s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Anatomy took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Anatomy took 0.00045180320739746094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Anatomy took 0.24137544631958008s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Anatomy took 0.020309925079345703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Anatomy took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Anatomy took 0.0007166862487792969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Anatomy took 0.00040531158447265625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Anatomy took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po took 2.564708709716797s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.0005064010620117188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.24576520919799805s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.02057647705078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 0.0007188320159912109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 6.508827209472656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Growth and Development Stage took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po_x1 took 2.627420663833618s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Ontology took 0.0005319118499755859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Ontology took 0.24130988121032715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Ontology took 0.020473241806030273s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Ontology took 0.000736236572265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Ontology took 0.0004394054412841797s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-po_x2 took 2.6048359870910645s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0004622936248779297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.23679161071777344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.020476818084716797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0007486343383789062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 0.0006577968597412109s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for PRotein Ontology (PRO) took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pr took 2.586974859237671s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Proteomics data and process provenance took 6.341934204101562e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.0005092620849609375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.26640939712524414s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.020473957061767578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Proteomics data and process provenance took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.0007357597351074219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Proteomics data and process provenance took 0.00025582313537597656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Proteomics data and process provenance took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-propreo took 2.6410977840423584s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Pathway ontology took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Pathway ontology took 0.0005040168762207031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Pathway ontology took 0.286301851272583s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Pathway ontology took 0.020436763763427734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Pathway ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Pathway ontology took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Pathway ontology took 0.00012373924255371094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Pathway ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-pw took 2.6923394203186035s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.0005059242248535156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.2633817195892334s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.023537635803222656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 1.4066696166992188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 0.0008606910705566406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 3.3855438232421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-qibo took 2.6137900352478027s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.0004260540008544922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.3106670379638672s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.020392894744873047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.0007185935974121094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 0.0018100738525390625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Read Codes, Clinical Terms Version 3 (CTV3) took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rcd took 3.168043851852417s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 4.3392181396484375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.000591278076171875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.27335500717163086s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.020277976989746094s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.0007238388061523438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 0.0001270771026611328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rctontology took 2.6120216846466064s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.0005071163177490234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.25484251976013184s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.020341157913208008s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.0007824897766113281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 0.00010418891906738281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Reproductive trait and phenotype ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-repo took 2.542117118835449s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Physico-chemical process took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Physico-chemical process took 0.0006299018859863281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Physico-chemical process took 0.2689478397369385s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Physico-chemical process took 0.020291805267333984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Physico-chemical process took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Physico-chemical process took 0.0007295608520507812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Physico-chemical process took 0.00021767616271972656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Physico-chemical process took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rex took 2.6124846935272217s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RadLex took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RadLex took 0.00047016143798828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RadLex took 0.28096938133239746s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RadLex took 0.021248579025268555s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RadLex took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RadLex took 0.0007092952728271484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RadLex took 0.0016355514526367188s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RadLex took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rid took 2.7084312438964844s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RNA ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RNA ontology took 0.0004999637603759766s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RNA ontology took 0.2677021026611328s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RNA ontology took 0.02027750015258789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RNA ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RNA ontology took 0.0007188320159912109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RNA ontology took 0.0005431175231933594s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RNA ontology took 4.291534423828125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rnao took 2.6365208625793457s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Role Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Role Ontology took 0.0004990100860595703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Role Ontology took 0.28289198875427246s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Role Ontology took 0.02026510238647461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Role Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Role Ontology took 0.0007529258728027344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Role Ontology took 0.0001862049102783203s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Role Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-roleo took 2.569430112838745s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Rat Strain Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.0004935264587402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.2738063335418701s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.020437240600585938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Rat Strain Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.0007367134094238281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Rat Strain Ontology took 0.00017142295837402344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Rat Strain Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rs took 2.563152313232422s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for RxNORM took 5.507469177246094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for RxNORM took 0.0005648136138916016s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for RxNORM took 0.2460041046142578s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for RxNORM took 0.020464658737182617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for RxNORM took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for RxNORM took 0.0007359981536865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for RxNORM took 0.0006270408630371094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for RxNORM took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-rxnorm took 2.622546672821045s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 5.1021575927734375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0005550384521484375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.2853128910064697s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.020159006118774414s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0007877349853515625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 0.0010883808135986328s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Subcellular Anatomy Ontology (SAO) took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sao took 2.676420211791992s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Systems Biology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Systems Biology took 0.0005273818969726562s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Systems Biology took 0.265794038772583s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Systems Biology took 0.02040863037109375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Systems Biology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Systems Biology took 0.0007212162017822266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Systems Biology took 0.0004496574401855469s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Systems Biology took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sbo took 2.661928653717041s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.0005030632019042969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.27587270736694336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.02034759521484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.0007197856903076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 0.000102996826171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Smoking Behavior Risk Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sbro took 2.6280019283294678s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sleep Domain Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.0005278587341308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.2702019214630127s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.020261764526367188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sleep Domain Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sleep Domain Ontology took 0.0013546943664550781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sleep Domain Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sdo took 2.6575727462768555s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sample processing and separation techniques took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.0005316734313964844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.2722015380859375s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.02016758918762207s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sample processing and separation techniques took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.0007326602935791016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sample processing and separation techniques took 0.0003437995910644531s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sample processing and separation techniques took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sep took 2.687459945678711s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Student Health Record took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Student Health Record took 0.0005929470062255859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Student Health Record took 0.26630234718322754s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Student Health Record took 0.020122289657592773s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Student Health Record took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Student Health Record took 0.0007710456848144531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Student Health Record took 0.0004391670227050781s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Student Health Record took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-shr took 2.6725881099700928s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0006573200225830078s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.26360011100769043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.020419836044311523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.0007402896881103516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 0.00127410888671875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SemanticScience Integrated Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sio took 3.2889180183410645s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Situation-Based Access Control took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.0005347728729248047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.2657809257507324s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.02051544189453125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Situation-Based Access Control took 1.71661376953125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.0007932186126708984s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Situation-Based Access Control took 0.00020766258239746094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Situation-Based Access Control took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sitbac took 2.700403928756714s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 6.0558319091796875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.000507354736328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.30134010314941406s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.020381450653076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.0007545948028564453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 0.0019762516021728516s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SNOMED Clinical Terms took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-snomedct took 3.0203330516815186s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SNP-Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SNP-Ontology took 0.0004813671112060547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SNP-Ontology took 0.277141809463501s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SNP-Ontology took 0.020301103591918945s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SNP-Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SNP-Ontology took 0.0007865428924560547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SNP-Ontology took 0.0006814002990722656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SNP-Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-snpo took 2.609095335006714s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Sequence types and features took 9.5367431640625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Sequence types and features took 0.0004665851593017578s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Sequence types and features took 0.2591378688812256s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Sequence types and features took 0.020235061645507812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Sequence types and features took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Sequence types and features took 0.0007269382476806641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Sequence types and features took 0.0005741119384765625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Sequence types and features took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-so_x1 took 2.5685901641845703s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 5.269050598144531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0005161762237548828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.3219301700592041s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.021010875701904297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0007212162017822266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 0.0016322135925292969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Suggested Ontology for Pharmacogenomics took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sopharm took 3.1315701007843018s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for SoyOntology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for SoyOntology took 0.0004858970642089844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for SoyOntology took 0.28072261810302734s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for SoyOntology took 0.020282506942749023s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for SoyOntology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for SoyOntology took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for SoyOntology took 0.00014400482177734375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for SoyOntology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-soy took 2.6393938064575195s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Spider Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Spider Ontology took 0.000492095947265625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Spider Ontology took 0.2635040283203125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Spider Ontology took 0.02033233642578125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Spider Ontology took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Spider Ontology took 0.0007340908050537109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Spider Ontology took 0.0003228187561035156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Spider Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-spd took 2.6247506141662598s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.0005140304565429688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.2665834426879883s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.02028512954711914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.0007419586181640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 0.0002892017364501953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-spto took 2.6090657711029053s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 7.486343383789062e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.0005517005920410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.28273892402648926s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.02118825912475586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.0007393360137939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 0.0004730224609375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Syndromic Surveillance Ontology took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-sso took 2.553880214691162s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Software Ontology took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Software Ontology took 0.0005133152008056641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Software Ontology took 0.26468896865844727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Software Ontology took 0.020106077194213867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Software Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Software Ontology took 0.0007233619689941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Software Ontology took 0.0004222393035888672s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Software Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-swo took 2.7748141288757324s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Tick gross anatomy took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Tick gross anatomy took 0.00046753883361816406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Tick gross anatomy took 0.26974058151245117s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Tick gross anatomy took 0.02035379409790039s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Tick gross anatomy took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Tick gross anatomy took 0.0007672309875488281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Tick gross anatomy took 0.00024437904357910156s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Tick gross anatomy took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tads took 2.5355637073516846s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.0005335807800292969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.25527453422546387s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.02033209800720215s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.0007266998291015625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 0.0008654594421386719s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Teleost Anatomy Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tao took 2.625725030899048s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.0004887580871582031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.25601840019226074s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.020372390747070312s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 0.0007255077362060547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 8.58306884765625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Taxonomic rank vocabulary took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-taxrank took 2.5709891319274902s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 4.696846008300781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.0005903244018554688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.24497127532958984s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.02030205726623535s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 0.0007326602935791016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 6.985664367675781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Terminology for the Description of Dynamics took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-teddy took 2.662668466567993s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Time Event Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Time Event Ontology took 0.0005240440368652344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Time Event Ontology took 0.2823762893676758s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Time Event Ontology took 0.02047443389892578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Time Event Ontology took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Time Event Ontology took 0.0007281303405761719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Time Event Ontology took 0.0008130073547363281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Time Event Ontology took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-teo took 2.6308577060699463s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Mosquito gross anatomy took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0005478858947753906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.2814650535583496s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.020379066467285156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Mosquito gross anatomy took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0007193088531494141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Mosquito gross anatomy took 0.0003857612609863281s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Mosquito gross anatomy took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tgma took 2.6088201999664307s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for thesaurus took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for thesaurus took 0.0005209445953369141s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for thesaurus took 0.2639620304107666s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for thesaurus took 0.020563125610351562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for thesaurus took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for thesaurus took 0.0007359981536865234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for thesaurus took 6.532669067382812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for thesaurus took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-thesaurus took 2.6432647705078125s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.0006608963012695312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.2716648578643799s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.02017378807067871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.0007431507110595703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 0.000347137451171875s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Traditional Medicine Signs and Symptoms Value Set took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tm-signs-and-sympts took 2.6648614406585693s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Translational Medicine Ontology took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0005166530609130859s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.2851142883300781s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.020710468292236328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Translational Medicine Ontology took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0010235309600830078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Translational Medicine Ontology took 0.0009617805480957031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Translational Medicine Ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tmo took 2.695845603942871s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Plant Trait Ontology took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.0005891323089599609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.2716336250305176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.02063918113708496s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Plant Trait Ontology took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.0008633136749267578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Plant Trait Ontology took 0.00017452239990234375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Plant Trait Ontology took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-to took 2.6732099056243896s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for TOK_Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for TOK_Ontology took 0.0005049705505371094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for TOK_Ontology took 0.2588517665863037s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for TOK_Ontology took 0.020488977432250977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for TOK_Ontology took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for TOK_Ontology took 0.0007798671722412109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for TOK_Ontology took 0.00017714500427246094s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for TOK_Ontology took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tok took 2.629103660583496s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Teleost taxonomy took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Teleost taxonomy took 0.0004494190216064453s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Teleost taxonomy took 0.26157498359680176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Teleost taxonomy took 0.020244598388671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Teleost taxonomy took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Teleost taxonomy took 0.0007257461547851562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Teleost taxonomy took 0.0001838207244873047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Teleost taxonomy took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-tto took 2.713463544845581s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Uber anatomy ontology took 4.00543212890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.00048613548278808594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.2544841766357422s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.020273685455322266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Uber anatomy ontology took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.0007140636444091797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Uber anatomy ontology took 0.001013040542602539s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Uber anatomy ontology took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-uberon took 2.6966352462768555s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Units Ontology took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Units Ontology took 0.0005891323089599609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Units Ontology took 0.28313541412353516s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Units Ontology took 0.020334243774414062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Units Ontology took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Units Ontology took 0.0007207393646240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Units Ontology took 0.0002155303955078125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Units Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-unitsontology took 2.6794135570526123s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Units of measurement took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Units of measurement took 0.0005068778991699219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Units of measurement took 0.2712993621826172s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Units of measurement took 0.02035975456237793s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Units of measurement took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Units of measurement took 0.0007376670837402344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Units of measurement took 0.0003056526184082031s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Units of measurement took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-uo took 2.643746852874756s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for VANDF took 5.602836608886719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for VANDF took 0.0005412101745605469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for VANDF took 0.2671468257904053s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for VANDF took 0.020168304443359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for VANDF took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for VANDF took 0.0007622241973876953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for VANDF took 0.0007009506225585938s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for VANDF took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vandf took 2.8185205459594727s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.0005044937133789062s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.27652740478515625s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.020894527435302734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.0007572174072265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 0.0005209445953369141s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vertebrate Anatomy Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vao took 2.6226537227630615s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0005993843078613281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.2727346420288086s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.02054142951965332s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0007212162017822266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 0.0006403923034667969s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for vertebrate Homologous Organ Groups took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vhog took 2.6375784873962402s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for VIVO took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for VIVO took 0.00048828125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for VIVO took 0.2522768974304199s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for VIVO took 0.020430803298950195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for VIVO took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for VIVO took 0.0007798671722412109s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for VIVO took 0.000392913818359375s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for VIVO took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vivo took 2.546541929244995s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vaccine Ontology took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0005588531494140625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vaccine Ontology took 0.2506392002105713s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0206754207611084s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vaccine Ontology took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vaccine Ontology took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vaccine Ontology took 0.001255035400390625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vaccine Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vo took 2.556273937225342s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.0005333423614501953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.27508091926574707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.020633459091186523s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.0007555484771728516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 0.00021767616271972656s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Vertebrate Trait Ontology took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-vt took 2.5952818393707275s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans gross anatomy took 7.748603820800781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0004868507385253906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.29320740699768066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.020535707473754883s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans gross anatomy took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0007495880126953125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans gross anatomy took 0.0005254745483398438s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans gross anatomy took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbbt took 2.6528878211975098s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans development took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans development took 0.0005002021789550781s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans development took 0.23837494850158691s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans development took 0.02056097984313965s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans development took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans development took 0.0007393360137939453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans development took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans development took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbls took 2.612790107727051s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for C. elegans phenotype took 4.2438507080078125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for C. elegans phenotype took 0.0006296634674072266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for C. elegans phenotype took 0.24174880981445312s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for C. elegans phenotype took 0.020465850830078125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for C. elegans phenotype took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for C. elegans phenotype took 0.0008027553558349609s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for C. elegans phenotype took 9.679794311523438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for C. elegans phenotype took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-wbphenotype took 2.6593499183654785s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0005278587341308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.26980018615722656s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.020511150360107422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0007300376892089844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 0.0006079673767089844s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-who took 2.5961830615997314s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Xenopus anatomy and development took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0006701946258544922s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.2731502056121826s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.02060079574584961s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Xenopus anatomy and development took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0008139610290527344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Xenopus anatomy and development took 0.0007486343383789062s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Xenopus anatomy and development took 5.4836273193359375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-xao took 2.6160690784454346s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 8.487701416015625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.0005140304565429688s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.27055883407592773s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.020537137985229492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.0007479190826416016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 0.0002434253692626953s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Experimental Conditions Ontology took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-xco took 2.584257125854492s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Yeast phenotypes took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Yeast phenotypes took 0.0004911422729492188s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Yeast phenotypes took 0.2683377265930176s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Yeast phenotypes took 0.020592212677001953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Yeast phenotypes took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Yeast phenotypes took 0.0007097721099853516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Yeast phenotypes took 0.00026535987854003906s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Yeast phenotypes took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-ypo took 2.6210362911224365s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 9.202957153320312e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0004909038543701172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.25774359703063965s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0203707218170166s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0007405281066894531s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 0.0007569789886474609s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Zebrafish anatomy and development took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bioportal-zfa took 2.56496524810791s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 7.772445678710938e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.0007250308990478516s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.24845361709594727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.02053380012512207s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 0.0007314682006835938s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 3.170967102050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Indian Terrorism Ontology (InTO) took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Bioportal_link took 3.7789113521575928s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BioSamples RDF took 0.42114758491516113s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BioSamples RDF took 0.00048351287841796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BioSamples RDF took 0.247772216796875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BioSamples RDF took 0.02072310447692871s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BioSamples RDF took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BioSamples RDF took 0.0007607936859130859s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BioSamples RDF took 3.314018249511719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BioSamples RDF took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for biosamples-rdf took 3.474860429763794s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.4589202404022217s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.0004563331604003906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.26560449600219727s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.020429372787475586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 0.0001163482666015625s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Linked Data took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bis-linked-data took 2.845834732055664s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bitzi took 3.981590270996094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bitzi took 0.0003509521484375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bitzi took 0.2694711685180664s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bitzi took 0.020527362823486328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bitzi took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bitzi took 0.000736236572265625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bitzi took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bitzi took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bitzi took 2.855644464492798s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BizkaiSense took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BizkaiSense took 0.0002524852752685547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BizkaiSense took 0.25158071517944336s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BizkaiSense took 0.02051091194152832s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BizkaiSense took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BizkaiSense took 0.0007367134094238281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BizkaiSense took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BizkaiSense took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bizkaisense took 2.909543037414551s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for blabla.itemlist took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for blabla.itemlist took 0.0004837512969970703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for blabla.itemlist took 0.2669801712036133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for blabla.itemlist took 0.02039170265197754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for blabla.itemlist took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for blabla.itemlist took 0.0007479190826416016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for blabla.itemlist took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for blabla.itemlist took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for blabla-itemlist took 2.895047664642334s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for blabla.itemlist took 3.9577484130859375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for blabla.itemlist took 0.00031185150146484375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for blabla.itemlist took 0.26395463943481445s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for blabla.itemlist took 0.020246028900146484s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for blabla.itemlist took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for blabla.itemlist took 0.0007853507995605469s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for blabla.itemlist took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for blabla.itemlist took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for blabla_itemlist took 2.787999391555786s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 5.435943603515625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.0005843639373779297s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.26932501792907715s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.02045273780822754s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 0.0007236003875732422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 3.7670135498046875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bibliography of Linguistic Literature (BLL) Thesaurus took 1.1444091796875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for bll-thesaurus took 3.6816046237945557s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 1.3363823890686035s
Availability | VoID file availability check for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.0005698204040527344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.276289701461792s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.020189762115478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 0.0007140636444091797s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 6.222724914550781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for British National Bibliography (BNB) - Linked Open Data took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bluk-bnb took 13.55399489402771s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.40705060958862305s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.0005729198455810547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.29392433166503906s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.020345211029052734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Thesaurus BNCF took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Thesaurus BNCF took 0.0007269382476806641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Thesaurus BNCF took 6.67572021484375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Thesaurus BNCF took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bncf-ns took 13.479211807250977s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.5267503261566162s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.0006396770477294922s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.2953784465789795s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.4898109436035156s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 6.242172479629517s
Interoperability | New terms check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 4.3067991733551025s
Versatility | Languages check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 60.28919339179993s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.1954190731048584s
Security | Check HTTPS for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.26864099502563477s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3592684268951416s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.8080682754516602s
Availability | RDF dump link check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.41135406494140625s
License | MR license check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.7397129535675049s
License | HR license check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 60.3121223449707s
Amount of data | Number of property check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3068702220916748s
Understandability | Number of label check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.4649879932403564s
Understandability | URI regex check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.6585028171539307s
Understandability | Vocabs check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.5072178840637207s
Verifiability | Authors check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.40073323249816895s
Verifiability | Publishers check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3118307590484619s
Performance | Throughput check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 11.820599555969238s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 7.271766662597656e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.31217145919799805s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.38474512100219727s
Interlinking | skos check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3232743740081787s
Interlinking | skos check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3191094398498535s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.471646785736084s
Currency | Creation date check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.7100174427032471s
Currency | Modification date check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.344390869140625s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 17.798405647277832s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3380262851715088s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.32776761054992676s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.3146505355834961s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.0077288150787354s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.03084564208984375s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.027564287185668945s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.31377553939819336s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 13.415915489196777s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.4071919918060303s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 2.1679375171661377s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.2763206958770752s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 14.184831857681274s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.030452966690063477s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.39841365814208984s
Security | Sign check for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.274080753326416s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 11.851692199707031s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.8442497253417969s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.020972728729248047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.6689300537109375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 0.0008223056793212891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 5.245208740234375e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BPR ? Bibliography of the Italian Parliament and electoral studies took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bpr took 444.61218214035034s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brazilian Politicians took 4.506111145019531e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brazilian Politicians took 0.0004570484161376953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brazilian Politicians took 0.2846190929412842s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brazilian Politicians took 0.02097153663635254s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brazilian Politicians took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brazilian Politicians took 0.0008983612060546875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brazilian Politicians took 7.677078247070312e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brazilian Politicians took 5.245208740234375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for brazilian-politicians took 3.052661180496216s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BrazilianCities took 4.029273986816406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BrazilianCities took 0.00024771690368652344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BrazilianCities took 0.27827906608581543s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BrazilianCities took 0.020540714263916016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BrazilianCities took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BrazilianCities took 0.0007174015045166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BrazilianCities took 3.123283386230469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BrazilianCities took 9.298324584960938e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for braziliancities took 3.356670379638672s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bricklink took 1.9495234489440918s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bricklink took 0.0006239414215087891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bricklink took 0.25362443923950195s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bricklink took 0.02031707763671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bricklink took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bricklink took 0.0007266998291015625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bricklink took 6.937980651855469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bricklink took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bricklink took 15.3440580368042s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for British Museum Collection took 30.175381660461426s
Availability | VoID file availability check for British Museum Collection took 0.0006151199340820312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for British Museum Collection took 0.2729330062866211s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for British Museum Collection took 0.020384550094604492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for British Museum Collection took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for British Museum Collection took 0.0007910728454589844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for British Museum Collection took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for British Museum Collection took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for british-museum-collection took 72.70676708221436s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.00043964385986328125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.2590358257293701s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.02060866355895996s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 0.0007784366607666016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 3.933906555175781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Brown Corpus in RDF/NIF took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for brown-corpus-in-rdf-nif took 2.92061710357666s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for French Plant Health Bulletins took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.0002789497375488281s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.2789022922515869s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.020337343215942383s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for French Plant Health Bulletins took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for French Plant Health Bulletins took 0.0007088184356689453s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for French Plant Health Bulletins took 2.7418136596679688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for French Plant Health Bulletins took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bsv took 4.113677024841309s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 2.7851154804229736s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.0005984306335449219s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.2537999153137207s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.02037835121154785s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 0.0007839202880859375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bulgarian admissions to correctional facilities Jan 2018 - Nov 2024 took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bulgarian_admissions_to_correctional_facilities took 8.830509185791016s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Bund Offener Haushalt took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.0002415180206298828s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.2706875801086426s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.020066022872924805s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Bund Offener Haushalt took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Bund Offener Haushalt took 0.0007174015045166016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Bund Offener Haushalt took 2.8133392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Bund Offener Haushalt took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bund-offener-haushalt took 3.0023698806762695s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 6.151199340820312e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.000240325927734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.2741258144378662s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.020263671875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 0.0007379055023193359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for BundestagNebeneinkuenfte took 6.198883056640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for bundestagnebeneinkuenfte took 3.4624202251434326s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for business.data.gov.uk took 0.29462265968322754s
Availability | VoID file availability check for business.data.gov.uk took 0.0005228519439697266s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for business.data.gov.uk took 0.24959135055541992s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for business.data.gov.uk took 0.020239591598510742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for business.data.gov.uk took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for business.data.gov.uk took 0.0007462501525878906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for business.data.gov.uk took 4.792213439941406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for business.data.gov.uk took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for business-data-gov-uk took 2.8314285278320312s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.5786573886871338s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.0006186962127685547s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 2.7500317096710205s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.6484520435333252s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.43164587020874023s
Interoperability | New terms check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.7199344635009766s
Versatility | Languages check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 43.38945436477661s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.3487513065338135s
Security | Check HTTPS for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.2048962116241455s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4426579475402832s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.3483107089996338s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.3645780086517334s
License | MR license check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4054903984069824s
License | HR license check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 21.749335289001465s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.3600599765777588s
Understandability | Number of label check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.7626962661743164s
Understandability | URI regex check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.0182538032531738s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.48010993003845215s
Verifiability | Authors check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.649728536605835s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.6674809455871582s
Performance | Throughput check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 12.194255352020264s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 7.653236389160156e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.323108434677124s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.3544738292694092s
Interlinking | skos check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.44663381576538086s
Interlinking | skos check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.303678035736084s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.33955931663513184s
Currency | Creation date check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.7656614780426025s
Currency | Modification date check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.6587448120117188s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 3.308840751647949s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.30959224700927734s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.4977090358734131s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.48837900161743164s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.0799756050109863s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.032854557037353516s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.029811382293701172s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.41368770599365234s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.4808566570281982s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.41238880157470703s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 3.010331630706787s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.3378286361694336s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 2.6580870151519775s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.03488874435424805s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.34603404998779297s
Security | Sign check for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.391735315322876s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 7059.139305591583s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.1600956916809082s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.021314382553100586s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 0.0007834434509277344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 5.888938903808594e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for BVMC took 7293.1446714401245s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 4.76837158203125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.00031304359436035156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.26450085639953613s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.020448923110961914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 0.0007367134094238281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 2.956390380859375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Price changes due to cabbage imports took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cabbage took 5.11572265625s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for cablegate took 1.839878797531128s
Availability | VoID file availability check for cablegate took 0.0005681514739990234s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for cablegate took 0.24363374710083008s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for cablegate took 0.03182268142700195s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for cablegate took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for cablegate took 0.0013189315795898438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for cablegate took 0.00010275840759277344s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for cablegate took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cablegate took 17.11333155632019s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Calames took 5.173683166503906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Calames took 0.000576019287109375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Calames took 0.25090503692626953s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Calames took 0.02169179916381836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Calames took 1.3113021850585938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Calames took 0.0009419918060302734s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Calames took 3.910064697265625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Calames took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for calames took 4.694926738739014s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.5271046161651611s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.0003123283386230469s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for CaLiGraph took 1.7399554252624512s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for CaLiGraph took 1.2611804008483887s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for CaLiGraph took 12.37045931816101s
Interoperability | New terms check for CaLiGraph took 2.081939935684204s
Versatility | Languages check for CaLiGraph took 60.359193325042725s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for CaLiGraph took 0.30359506607055664s
Security | Check HTTPS for CaLiGraph took 0.17651724815368652s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for CaLiGraph took 0.43921780586242676s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for CaLiGraph took 0.2519412040710449s
Availability | RDF dump link check for CaLiGraph took 0.2607572078704834s
License | MR license check for CaLiGraph took 0.3379197120666504s
License | HR license check for CaLiGraph took 60.35862064361572s
Amount of data | Number of property check for CaLiGraph took 0.2659416198730469s
Understandability | Number of label check for CaLiGraph took 4.2146172523498535s
Understandability | URI regex check for CaLiGraph took 0.5642144680023193s
Understandability | Vocabs check for CaLiGraph took 0.24651813507080078s
Verifiability | Authors check for CaLiGraph took 0.2671325206756592s
Verifiability | Publishers check for CaLiGraph took 0.2794067859649658s
Performance | Throughput check for CaLiGraph took 11.36210560798645s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for CaLiGraph took 0.018444538116455078s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for CaLiGraph took 0.24302077293395996s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for CaLiGraph took 0.7100014686584473s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.37413501739501953s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.25011205673217773s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for CaLiGraph took 0.2763097286224365s
Currency | Creation date check for CaLiGraph took 0.517611026763916s
Currency | Modification date check for CaLiGraph took 0.546454668045044s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for CaLiGraph took 61.237334966659546s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for CaLiGraph took 3.5762786865234375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for CaLiGraph took 0.24396848678588867s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 0.304675817489624s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 0.33175039291381836s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for CaLiGraph took 0.6956796646118164s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for CaLiGraph took 0.02633070945739746s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for CaLiGraph took 0.05083298683166504s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for CaLiGraph took 0.3550605773925781s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for CaLiGraph took 61.151551246643066s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for CaLiGraph took 0.4986531734466553s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for CaLiGraph took 2.129758834838867s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for CaLiGraph took 1.3217267990112305s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for CaLiGraph took 61.58895015716553s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.034627676010131836s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.5050272941589355s
Security | Sign check for CaLiGraph took 0.39374828338623047s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for CaLiGraph took 11.175138473510742s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CaLiGraph took 0.7966251373291016s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CaLiGraph took 0.020664215087890625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CaLiGraph took 1.8596649169921875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CaLiGraph took 0.0007791519165039062s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CaLiGraph took 3.910064697265625e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for CaLiGraph took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CaLiGraph took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CaLiGraph took 1493.3863706588745s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.28052282333374023s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CaLiGraph took 0.0007989406585693359s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for CaLiGraph took 1.6486778259277344s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for CaLiGraph took 1.2557754516601562s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for CaLiGraph took 12.533724308013916s
Interoperability | New terms check for CaLiGraph took 2.0969491004943848s
Versatility | Languages check for CaLiGraph took 60.31995439529419s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for CaLiGraph took 0.26114368438720703s
Security | Check HTTPS for CaLiGraph took 0.1395277976989746s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for CaLiGraph took 0.25033140182495117s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for CaLiGraph took 0.26983189582824707s
Availability | RDF dump link check for CaLiGraph took 0.25311994552612305s
License | MR license check for CaLiGraph took 0.2556126117706299s
License | HR license check for CaLiGraph took 60.25591683387756s
Amount of data | Number of property check for CaLiGraph took 0.24834346771240234s
Understandability | Number of label check for CaLiGraph took 3.1074914932250977s
Understandability | URI regex check for CaLiGraph took 0.5189974308013916s
Understandability | Vocabs check for CaLiGraph took 0.2953357696533203s
Verifiability | Authors check for CaLiGraph took 0.24750542640686035s
Verifiability | Publishers check for CaLiGraph took 0.25568485260009766s
Performance | Throughput check for CaLiGraph took 10.997774124145508s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for CaLiGraph took 0.010299444198608398s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for CaLiGraph took 0.2550666332244873s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for CaLiGraph took 0.6732790470123291s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.2455604076385498s
Interlinking | skos check for CaLiGraph took 0.237501859664917s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for CaLiGraph took 0.24481892585754395s
Currency | Creation date check for CaLiGraph took 0.5149946212768555s
Currency | Modification date check for CaLiGraph took 0.5207734107971191s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for CaLiGraph took 61.19640302658081s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for CaLiGraph took 2.1457672119140625e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for CaLiGraph took 0.2585873603820801s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 0.2736976146697998s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for CaLiGraph took 0.2605440616607666s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for CaLiGraph took 0.6076066493988037s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for CaLiGraph took 0.02652883529663086s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for CaLiGraph took 0.04929184913635254s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for CaLiGraph took 0.28250837326049805s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for CaLiGraph took 60.989192724227905s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for CaLiGraph took 0.601691722869873s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for CaLiGraph took 2.112374782562256s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for CaLiGraph took 1.276181936264038s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for CaLiGraph took 61.575841665267944s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.029621362686157227s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for CaLiGraph took 0.49933719635009766s
Security | Sign check for CaLiGraph took 0.24727916717529297s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for CaLiGraph took 12.256542444229126s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CaLiGraph took 0.4562516212463379s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CaLiGraph took 0.020783662796020508s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CaLiGraph took 1.7881393432617188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CaLiGraph took 0.0007123947143554688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CaLiGraph took 7.033348083496094e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for CaLiGraph took 4.5299530029296875e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CaLiGraph took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for caligraph took 1473.4275240898132s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for can-link took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for can-link took 0.0003211498260498047s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for can-link took 0.7121262550354004s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for can-link took 0.02080678939819336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for can-link took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for can-link took 0.0007297992706298828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for can-link took 3.170967102050781e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for can-link took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for can-link took 4.773416757583618s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.057112932205200195s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.0004975795745849609s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.27397775650024414s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.0206606388092041s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 0.0007755756378173828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 3.314018249511719e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Postal codes Italy (LinkedOpenData.it) took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cap-italy-rdf took 2.9719762802124023s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for person took 4.458427429199219e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for person took 0.00025773048400878906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for person took 0.27849888801574707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for person took 0.02076554298400879s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for person took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for person took 0.0007450580596923828s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for person took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for person took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for card took 2.805891990661621s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0006859302520751953s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.2583169937133789s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.021113872528076172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 0.0007040500640869141s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Catalan EuroWordNet-lemon lexicon (3.0) took 8.821487426757812e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for catalan-eurowordnet-lemon-lexicon-3-0 took 3.431725025177002s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 4.9591064453125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.0002655982971191406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.2782738208770752s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.020752668380737305s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 0.0007183551788330078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 3.0517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis took 8.106231689453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for catalogus-professorum-lipsiensis took 3.3603219985961914s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.6480762958526611s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.0002808570861816406s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 117.46256494522095s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.9827263355255127s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 8.487044334411621s
Interoperability | New terms check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 13.185948133468628s
Versatility | Languages check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 300.180890083313s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 3.146326780319214s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.23170185089111328s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 12.37222933769226s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.26693296432495117s
License | MR license check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.5617151260375977s
License | HR license check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 300.1766140460968s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.3094336986541748s
Understandability | Number of label check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.7203621864318848s
Understandability | URI regex check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.7399990558624268s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.3438832759857178s
Verifiability | Authors check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.20009994506835938s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.2690558433532715s
Performance | Throughput check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 11.484447956085205s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.0001621246337890625s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.19816923141479492s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.21311593055725098s
Interlinking | skos check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.538844108581543s
Interlinking | skos check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.4456770420074463s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 8.805593252182007s
Currency | Creation date check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.4817771911621094s
Currency | Modification date check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.21759843826293945s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 155.4372718334198s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.1995551586151123s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.35197949409484863s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.34907960891723633s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 40.7885479927063s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.653459072113037s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.711333990097046s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.17920446395874023s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 88.00770330429077s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 8.407387256622314s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 36.74267649650574s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.4302213191986084s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 84.82637786865234s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 2.756420135498047s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.594876766204834s
Security | Sign check for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.4473412036895752s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 10.154261589050293s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.7315645217895508s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.02070760726928711s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.7642974853515625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 0.0007233619689941406s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 1.9073486328125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Norway catch records dataset @PSNC took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Catch_Record_(2014-_2019) took 2275.5164654254913s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 4.744529724121094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.0007655620574951172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.6952941417694092s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.02077627182006836s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 1.52587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.0007216930389404297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 0.00010561943054199219s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CE4R Knowledge Centre Corporate Excellence – Centre for Reputation Leadership took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ce4r took 49.45579171180725s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.39417076110839844s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.0002548694610595703s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.4720747470855713s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.7344624996185303s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.4187788963317871s
Interoperability | New terms check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.7007739543914795s
Versatility | Languages check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 58.12801551818848s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1521005630493164s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.2678508758544922s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.18055200576782227s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.14848661422729492s
License | MR license check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.24865937232971191s
License | HR license check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3246653079986572s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1507420539855957s
Understandability | Number of label check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.29035496711730957s
Understandability | URI regex check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3150966167449951s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1506197452545166s
Verifiability | Authors check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1803743839263916s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.2075364589691162s
Performance | Throughput check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 11.021710395812988s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 6.818771362304688e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.18024468421936035s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.14409494400024414s
Interlinking | skos check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.20547986030578613s
Interlinking | skos check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1499652862548828s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.1710505485534668s
Currency | Creation date check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.3851945400238037s
Currency | Modification date check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.33403801918029785s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 2.13175368309021s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.13399481773376465s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.19134044647216797s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.17035603523254395s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.666644811630249s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.02823495864868164s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.029445886611938477s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.18958330154418945s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.186643123626709s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 2.0290474891662598s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.2902374267578125s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.4771661758422852s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.029544353485107422s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.21577739715576172s
Security | Sign check for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.13297581672668457s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1860.904525756836s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.4922161102294922s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.02007007598876953s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 0.0007076263427734375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Linked Data Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands took 1.33514404296875e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for ceo took 1985.4407365322113s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Charging Stations took 4.172325134277344e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Charging Stations took 0.00025272369384765625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Charging Stations took 0.26490211486816406s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Charging Stations took 0.020333290100097656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Charging Stations took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Charging Stations took 0.0007228851318359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Charging Stations took 3.0040740966796875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Charging Stations took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for charging-stations took 4.495781183242798s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chat Game corpus took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chat Game corpus took 0.0006811618804931641s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chat Game corpus took 0.25273942947387695s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chat Game corpus took 0.02057814598083496s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chat Game corpus took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chat Game corpus took 0.0007281303405761719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chat Game corpus took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chat Game corpus took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chat-game-corpus took 12.99657416343689s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.00025963783264160156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.6855924129486084s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.02046942710876465s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 8.821487426757812e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 0.0007410049438476562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 3.337860107421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chebi took 3.240173816680908s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chem2Bio2RDF took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.0005116462707519531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.27988648414611816s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.02071833610534668s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chem2Bio2RDF took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chem2Bio2RDF took 0.0007669925689697266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chem2Bio2RDF took 5.8650970458984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chem2Bio2RDF took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chem2bio2rdf took 135.35163593292236s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ChEMBL RDF took 0.6289646625518799s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ChEMBL RDF took 0.0003075599670410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ChEMBL RDF took 0.6895225048065186s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ChEMBL RDF took 0.02046656608581543s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ChEMBL RDF took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ChEMBL RDF took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ChEMBL RDF took 4.863739013671875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ChEMBL RDF took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chembl-rdf took 4.113005638122559s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb  dataset took 1.108818769454956s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb  dataset took 0.00025177001953125s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb  dataset took 10.741029500961304s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb  dataset took 2.5050084590911865s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5447430610656738s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb  dataset took 3.935412883758545s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb  dataset took 29.52811884880066s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5198156833648682s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb  dataset took 0.6499109268188477s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb  dataset took 1.4443395137786865s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb  dataset took 0.8069441318511963s
License | MR license check for chemdb  dataset took 3.1054701805114746s
License | HR license check for chemdb  dataset took 4.052612066268921s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5287199020385742s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb  dataset took 5.029046535491943s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb  dataset took 1.9335155487060547s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb  dataset took 0.8280611038208008s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb  dataset took 1.1424674987792969s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb  dataset took 0.8425929546356201s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb  dataset took 12.028076648712158s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb  dataset took 7.104873657226562e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb  dataset took 0.8388521671295166s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb  dataset took 1.1731224060058594s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb  dataset took 1.8861501216888428s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb  dataset took 0.48470354080200195s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb  dataset took 1.1303839683532715s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb  dataset took 1.3461077213287354s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb  dataset took 1.0286962985992432s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb  dataset took 3.450849771499634s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb  dataset took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb  dataset took 0.5248622894287109s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb  dataset took 0.8011643886566162s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb  dataset took 0.7699429988861084s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb  dataset took 3.098954677581787s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb  dataset took 0.030562877655029297s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb  dataset took 0.03294110298156738s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb  dataset took 0.8332252502441406s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb  dataset took 1.2407026290893555s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb  dataset took 0.6211130619049072s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb  dataset took 3.92195200920105s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb  dataset took 1.26837158203125s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb  dataset took 1.989699125289917s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb  dataset took 0.03210282325744629s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb  dataset took 0.5150518417358398s
Security | Sign check for chemdb  dataset took 1.7305631637573242s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb  dataset took 2647.69069314003s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb  dataset took 1.1996104717254639s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb  dataset took 0.020807981491088867s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb  dataset took 1.6689300537109375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb  dataset took 0.0007205009460449219s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb  dataset took 7.176399230957031e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb  dataset took 9.5367431640625e-07s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb  dataset took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-basicInfo took 3707.551970720291s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5221977233886719s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0004856586456298828s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 10.601390600204468s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.5118789672851562s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5498359203338623s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 3.9503984451293945s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 30.118605852127075s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5217504501342773s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5241413116455078s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.466921091079712s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.810837984085083s
License | MR license check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.770629644393921s
License | HR license check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 4.170262336730957s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5396692752838135s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 5.021205186843872s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.9959299564361572s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.8199844360351562s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.1055283546447754s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.8093838691711426s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 12.006752967834473s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 7.319450378417969e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.8378098011016846s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.1909842491149902s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.9514927864074707s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5112700462341309s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.1270411014556885s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.338099718093872s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.0357789993286133s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 3.3752827644348145s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5152761936187744s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.7921795845031738s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.7629778385162354s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 3.0892159938812256s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0299832820892334s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.03321433067321777s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.8351681232452393s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.2532908916473389s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.6084940433502197s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 4.387655973434448s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.3143863677978516s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.9998822212219238s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.032536983489990234s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.5091350078582764s
Security | Sign check for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.9496965408325195s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2656.9124450683594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.6039855480194092s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.02105855941772461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 0.0009505748748779297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 5.9604644775390625e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 2.1457672119140625e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb estimated properties dataset took 7.867813110351562e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-estimatedProperties took 3713.8019757270813s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.522895097732544s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.0003192424774169922s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb phase transition dataset took 10.439655065536499s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.490978240966797s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5518255233764648s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 3.927478551864624s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 29.47088360786438s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5158224105834961s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5320742130279541s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.265221118927002s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.8106513023376465s
License | MR license check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 3.276247978210449s
License | HR license check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 4.2194719314575195s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5131349563598633s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 5.145272970199585s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.8732950687408447s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.8331542015075684s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.1602795124053955s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.8380730152130127s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 12.536339521408081s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb phase transition dataset took 7.176399230957031e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.8472738265991211s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.1937718391418457s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.9235115051269531s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5046908855438232s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.1555936336517334s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.319871187210083s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.021409034729004s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb phase transition dataset took 3.4023265838623047s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.384185791015625e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5036602020263672s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.8050060272216797s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.7784812450408936s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb phase transition dataset took 3.198715925216675s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.030522823333740234s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.03301262855529785s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.8382179737091064s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.224808692932129s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.6023011207580566s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb phase transition dataset took 3.9121387004852295s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.283156156539917s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.9800381660461426s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.033045053482055664s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.5203557014465332s
Security | Sign check for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2.1199936866760254s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb phase transition dataset took 2708.3295454978943s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.1880099773406982s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.020545005798339844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb phase transition dataset took 0.0007212162017822266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb phase transition dataset took 5.1975250244140625e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb phase transition dataset took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb phase transition dataset took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-phaseTransition took 3768.819832801819s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5218114852905273s
Availability | VoID file availability check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.0002644062042236328s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 15.118786811828613s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.5165815353393555s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.551760196685791s
Interoperability | New terms check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 4.462913513183594s
Versatility | Languages check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 27.486316204071045s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5302417278289795s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5333354473114014s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.3710403442382812s
Availability | RDF dump link check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.7803490161895752s
License | MR license check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.6359598636627197s
License | HR license check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 4.006178855895996s
Amount of data | Number of property check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5321364402770996s
Understandability | Number of label check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 4.335993766784668s
Understandability | URI regex check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.8781085014343262s
Understandability | Vocabs check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.7792856693267822s
Verifiability | Authors check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.1367971897125244s
Verifiability | Publishers check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.7959649562835693s
Performance | Throughput check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 12.952574968338013s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 7.271766662597656e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.8058030605316162s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.1186113357543945s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.0147058963775635s
Interlinking | skos check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5062909126281738s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.1656279563903809s
Currency | Creation date check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.3572752475738525s
Currency | Modification date check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.0246429443359375s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 3.835949182510376s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.6689300537109375e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5010766983032227s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.7981503009796143s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.7699310779571533s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 3.9726130962371826s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.029662132263183594s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.033150434494018555s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.8032393455505371s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.2178220748901367s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.6108062267303467s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 6.151402950286865s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.2604973316192627s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.9614746570587158s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.03254985809326172s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.5228509902954102s
Security | Sign check for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.958423376083374s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2652.7197918891907s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.141017198562622s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.021059036254882812s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 2.4557113647460938e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 0.0007369518280029297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 6.818771362304688e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 1.1920928955078125e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for chemdb thermochemistry dataset took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chemdb-thermochemistry took 3714.086628675461s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ChemPedia RDF took 4.744529724121094e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ChemPedia RDF took 0.0007262229919433594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ChemPedia RDF took 0.7143309116363525s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ChemPedia RDF took 0.02085733413696289s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ChemPedia RDF took 1.430511474609375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ChemPedia RDF took 0.0009291172027587891s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ChemPedia RDF took 3.552436828613281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ChemPedia RDF took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chempedia-rdf took 10.303926706314087s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chiman Maru took 4.4345855712890625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chiman Maru took 0.00027632713317871094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chiman Maru took 0.29135751724243164s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chiman Maru took 0.020460844039916992s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chiman Maru took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chiman Maru took 0.0007567405700683594s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chiman Maru took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chiman Maru took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ChimanMaru_Entrepreneur took 3.2978827953338623s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 393.3076822757721s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.0006787776947021484s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.27359461784362793s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.02150726318359375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 1.33514404296875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 0.0007374286651611328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 3.3855438232421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chinese Red Song Linked Data Dataset took 9.5367431640625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Chinese_Red_Classic_Song_Linked_Data_Dataset took 799.3809072971344s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Chronicling America took 4.982948303222656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Chronicling America took 0.0006856918334960938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Chronicling America took 0.6919307708740234s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Chronicling America took 0.020458698272705078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Chronicling America took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Chronicling America took 0.0007374286651611328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Chronicling America took 0.0001685619354248047s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Chronicling America took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for chronicling-america took 7.598264217376709s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.7692215442657471s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.00049591064453125s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 120.86873006820679s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 1.5112731456756592s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.6734352111816406s
Interoperability | New terms check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 2.2681033611297607s
Versatility | Languages check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 1.4307458400726318s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.5542514324188232s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3238062858581543s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.2879011631011963s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 9.230615139007568s
License | MR license check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.2850468158721924s
License | HR license check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3815338611602783s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3529210090637207s
Understandability | Number of label check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3092989921569824s
Understandability | URI regex check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.6026968955993652s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.294039249420166s
Verifiability | Authors check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.2889678478240967s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.3397057056427002s
Performance | Throughput check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 12.099156618118286s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 3.4332275390625e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.31051111221313477s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.27862071990966797s
Interlinking | skos check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.278043270111084s
Interlinking | skos check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.30680418014526367s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.26906776428222656s
Currency | Creation date check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.6380903720855713s
Currency | Modification date check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.6064250469207764s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 12.985143184661865s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 7.568379163742065s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.30926990509033203s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.27247166633605957s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.28681421279907227s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 3.8813843727111816s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.22334575653076172s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.32479023933410645s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 1.0178818702697754s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.31156301498413086s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 6.791961669921875s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 2.21895694732666s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.0001373291015625s
Security | Sign check for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.28171300888061523s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 317.30913734436035s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.5498008728027344s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.1515035629272461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.001071929931640625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 0.0001087188720703125s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 3.0415596961975098s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cultural Heritage Thesaurus took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cht took 537.6268813610077s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ciard-ring took 4.553794860839844e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ciard-ring took 0.0006098747253417969s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ciard-ring took 0.7045314311981201s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ciard-ring took 0.08204269409179688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ciard-ring took 1.6689300537109375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ciard-ring took 0.0010898113250732422s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ciard-ring took 6.270408630371094e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ciard-ring took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for ciard-ring took 5.450698614120483s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cine Figure took 0.0005562305450439453s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cine Figure took 0.0004839897155761719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cine Figure took 0.263718843460083s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cine Figure took 0.020353317260742188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cine Figure took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cine Figure took 0.0007877349853515625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cine Figure took 4.649162292480469e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cine Figure took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Cine_Figure took 2.417428731918335s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 22.753760814666748s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 0.0006937980651855469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 0.273944616317749s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 0.021080732345581055s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 1.2636184692382812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 0.0009212493896484375s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 6.818771362304688e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cinémathèque québécoise Linked Open Data took 1.9311904907226562e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for cinematheque-quebecoise-linked-open-data took 176.44822788238525s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CIPFA took 6.628036499023438e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CIPFA took 0.0005435943603515625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CIPFA took 0.2642483711242676s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CIPFA took 0.020826339721679688s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CIPFA took 1.3589859008789062e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CIPFA took 0.0008227825164794922s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CIPFA took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CIPFA took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cipfa took 3.5594446659088135s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 60.05810832977295s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 0.0008833408355712891s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 0.27984166145324707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 0.021024703979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 1.5735626220703125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 0.0007793903350830078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 0.00040149688720703125s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for ckan took 263.58932065963745s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 0.4858222007751465s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 0.0006306171417236328s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 0.7221179008483887s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 0.020248889923095703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 0.0007288455963134766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 3.504753112792969e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Corpus for Latin Sociolinguistic Studies on Epigraphic textS (CLaSSES) in LiLa took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CLaSSES took 4.954917907714844s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Temples of the Classical World took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Temples of the Classical World took 0.0006933212280273438s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Temples of the Classical World took 0.27644824981689453s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Temples of the Classical World took 0.02044820785522461s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Temples of the Classical World took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Temples of the Classical World took 0.0007507801055908203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Temples of the Classical World took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Temples of the Classical World took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for classical_temples took 4.57820725440979s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 2.070478677749634s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 0.0005812644958496094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 0.2875523567199707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 0.020665884017944336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 0.0007920265197753906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 8.726119995117188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Linked Clean Energy Data (reegle.info) took 4.76837158203125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clean-energy-data-reegle took 12.746755361557007s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-afbo took 4.291534423828125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-afbo took 0.0006203651428222656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-afbo took 0.2815849781036377s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-afbo took 0.020452260971069336s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-afbo took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-afbo took 0.0007426738739013672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-afbo took 7.62939453125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-afbo took 5.9604644775390625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-afbo took 3.9857852458953857s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-APICS took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-APICS took 0.0005948543548583984s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-APICS took 0.26767563819885254s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-APICS took 0.02038741111755371s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-APICS took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-APICS took 0.0007221698760986328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-APICS took 7.510185241699219e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-APICS took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-apics took 4.0554022789001465s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-EWAVE took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-EWAVE took 0.0006005764007568359s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-EWAVE took 0.263749361038208s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-EWAVE took 0.02037334442138672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-EWAVE took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-EWAVE took 0.0007379055023193359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-EWAVE took 3.62396240234375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-EWAVE took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-ewave took 3.4334263801574707s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 4.410743713378906e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 0.0006399154663085938s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 0.26825761795043945s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 0.020354032516479492s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 1.0728836059570312e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 0.0007565021514892578s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 9.584426879882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-GLOTTOLOG took 3.2901763916015625e-05s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-glottolog took 3.460645914077759s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 4.38690185546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 0.0006358623504638672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 0.25701355934143066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 0.02075362205505371s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 0.0007526874542236328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 8.392333984375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-PHOIBLE took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-phoible took 3.491961717605591s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-SAILS took 4.792213439941406e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-SAILS took 0.0005671977996826172s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-SAILS took 0.25164341926574707s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-SAILS took 0.02071237564086914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-SAILS took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-SAILS took 0.000732421875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-SAILS took 7.772445678710938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-SAILS took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-sails took 3.63911771774292s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-WALS took 4.220008850097656e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-WALS took 0.0005540847778320312s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-WALS took 0.27794861793518066s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-WALS took 0.020289897918701172s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-WALS took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-WALS took 0.0007309913635253906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-WALS took 8.034706115722656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-WALS took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-wals took 3.917752265930176s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CLLD-WOLD took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CLLD-WOLD took 0.0006034374237060547s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CLLD-WOLD took 0.2397761344909668s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CLLD-WOLD took 0.020696640014648438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CLLD-WOLD took 1.049041748046875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CLLD-WOLD took 0.0007519721984863281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CLLD-WOLD took 7.843971252441406e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CLLD-WOLD took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for clld-wold took 3.510765552520752s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for COD inventory took 4.100799560546875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for COD inventory took 0.00022721290588378906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for COD inventory took 0.28997039794921875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for COD inventory took 0.020731449127197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for COD inventory took 1.1444091796875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for COD inventory took 0.0007326602935791016s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for COD inventory took 3.147125244140625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for COD inventory took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cod-inventory took 2.9086313247680664s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cooperation Databank took 0.13916277885437012s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cooperation Databank took 0.00021028518676757812s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cooperation Databank took 0.2739262580871582s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cooperation Databank took 0.020983457565307617s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cooperation Databank took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cooperation Databank took 0.0007965564727783203s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cooperation Databank took 3.600120544433594e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cooperation Databank took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CoDa took 2.573063611984253s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CODE Endpoint took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CODE Endpoint took 0.0002961158752441406s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CODE Endpoint took 0.2587432861328125s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CODE Endpoint took 0.02105545997619629s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CODE Endpoint took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CODE Endpoint took 0.0007483959197998047s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CODE Endpoint took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CODE Endpoint took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for code-endpoint took 2.8350830078125s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for OpenUpLabs COINS took 0.5778601169586182s
Availability | VoID file availability check for OpenUpLabs COINS took 0.0004546642303466797s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for OpenUpLabs COINS took 0.2802119255065918s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for OpenUpLabs COINS took 0.020865440368652344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for OpenUpLabs COINS took 1.811981201171875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for OpenUpLabs COINS took 0.0007402896881103516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for OpenUpLabs COINS took 3.0279159545898438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for OpenUpLabs COINS took 5.0067901611328125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for coins-openuplabs took 3.072124481201172s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 3.426548480987549s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 0.00024437904357910156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 0.2630739212036133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 0.020915508270263672s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 0.0007481575012207031s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 8.416175842285156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Catalogue of Life in China 2003 Edition took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CoLChina_sp2000 took 7.280465841293335s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 0.05140233039855957s
Availability | VoID file availability check for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 0.0004677772521972656s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 0.27582263946533203s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 0.020401954650878906s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 0.0007195472717285156s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 3.838539123535156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for COLINDA - Conference Linked Data took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for colinda took 2.532809019088745s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CN  2012 took 26.227030515670776s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CN  2012 took 0.0009877681732177734s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CN  2012 took 0.28041768074035645s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CN  2012 took 0.020746707916259766s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CN  2012 took 1.6450881958007812e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CN  2012 took 0.0008034706115722656s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CN  2012 took 3.3855438232421875e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CN  2012 took 5.7220458984375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for combined-nomenclature-2012 took 125.39154052734375s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 4.1484832763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 0.00027942657470703125s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 0.2607097625732422s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 0.020201921463012695s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 0.0007879734039306641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 2.7179718017578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Comments on Literature in Literature (CoLiL) took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for comments-on-literature-in-literature took 2.9243323802948s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 4.57763671875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 0.0002696514129638672s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 0.25897645950317383s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 0.020275354385375977s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 0.0007300376892089844s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 2.9087066650390625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of strawberry by period took 9.059906005859375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for comparative-analysis-of-production-volume-by-area-of-strawberry-by-period took 2.8962819576263428s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 4.076957702636719e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 0.000240325927734375s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 0.26372361183166504s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 0.020241975784301758s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 0.0007407665252685547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 2.7894973754882812e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Price competitiveness of pear by region took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for comparative-analysis-of-production-volume-by-area-of-watermelon-by-period took 2.9403672218322754s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 8.702278137207031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 0.00027489662170410156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 0.2775552272796631s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 0.02051401138305664s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 9.059906005859375e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 0.0007319450378417969s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 2.765655517578125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Comparative analysis of production volume by area of watermelon by period took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for comparative-analysis-of-production-volume-by-area-of-watermelon-by-period-2 took 2.9163267612457275s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 0.0002551078796386719s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 0.252103328704834s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 0.02024698257446289s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 0.0008447170257568359s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 2.8371810913085938e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Price competitiveness of grape by region took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for comparison-of-price-competitiveness-of-grape-by-region took 2.940361261367798s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 0.3390316963195801s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 0.00043654441833496094s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 0.2575688362121582s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 0.020731449127197266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 1.2874603271484375e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 0.0007369518280029297s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 3.4809112548828125e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Computational Historical Semantics in LiLa took 7.3909759521484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CompHistSem took 8.738622665405273s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 2.9889073371887207s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 0.0003299713134765625s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 0.2787644863128662s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 0.020361661911010742s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 1.0967254638671875e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 0.0007696151733398438s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 3.2901763916015625e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Requirements on the COMSODE project based on selected datasets took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for comsode-d3-2 took 9.921134233474731s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for ConceptNet took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for ConceptNet took 0.00023937225341796875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for ConceptNet took 0.26921510696411133s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for ConceptNet took 0.020268678665161133s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for ConceptNet took 1.0013580322265625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for ConceptNet took 0.0007679462432861328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for ConceptNet took 2.6464462280273438e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for ConceptNet took 8.58306884765625e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for conceptnet took 2.851792573928833s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for 2011 US Congress People took 5.650520324707031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for 2011 US Congress People took 0.0002884864807128906s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for 2011 US Congress People took 0.2624659538269043s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for 2011 US Congress People took 0.020285367965698242s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for 2011 US Congress People took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for 2011 US Congress People took 0.0007250308990478516s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for 2011 US Congress People took 7.939338684082031e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for 2011 US Congress People took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for congresspeople took 2.9712603092193604s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for MIMO took 0.33947062492370605s
Availability | VoID file availability check for MIMO took 0.00033164024353027344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for MIMO took 0.2340104579925537s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for MIMO took 0.02023792266845703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for MIMO took 1.3828277587890625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for MIMO took 0.0007207393646240234s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for MIMO took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for MIMO took 6.67572021484375e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for CONNECTED took 3.655351400375366s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for LODsyndesis Dataset took 4.0531158447265625e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for LODsyndesis Dataset took 0.00025463104248046875s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for LODsyndesis Dataset took 0.25823211669921875s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for LODsyndesis Dataset took 0.02009439468383789s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for LODsyndesis Dataset took 1.0251998901367188e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for LODsyndesis Dataset took 0.0007367134094238281s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for LODsyndesis Dataset took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for LODsyndesis Dataset took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for connectivity-of-lod-datasets took 2.875112771987915s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 4.482269287109375e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 0.00024437904357910156s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 0.2573378086090088s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 0.02016901969909668s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 9.298324584960938e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 0.0007212162017822266s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 2.6941299438476562e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Copac: union catalogue of major University, Specialist, and National Libraries in the UK and Ireland took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for copac-library-catalogue took 2.8213629722595215s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Copyright Free Music took 4.124641418457031e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Copyright Free Music took 0.0003116130828857422s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Copyright Free Music took 0.2599451541900635s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Copyright Free Music took 0.02023792266845703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Copyright Free Music took 9.775161743164062e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Copyright Free Music took 0.0007269382476806641s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Copyright Free Music took 2.8848648071289062e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Copyright Free Music took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Copyright_Free_Music took 3.3763279914855957s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CopyrightTermBank took 5.340576171875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CopyrightTermBank took 0.0006058216094970703s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CopyrightTermBank took 0.2741365432739258s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CopyrightTermBank took 0.020774364471435547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CopyrightTermBank took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CopyrightTermBank took 0.0008335113525390625s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CopyrightTermBank took 8.320808410644531e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CopyrightTermBank took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for copyrighttermbank took 34.17623567581177s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 2.209989309310913s
Availability | VoID file availability check for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 0.0007605552673339844s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 0.24905800819396973s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 0.020164012908935547s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 9.5367431640625e-06s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 0.0007352828979492188s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 3.457069396972656e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for CORE - Semantic Similarity of Open Access publications took 6.4373016357421875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for core took 7.1970438957214355s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.6471068859100342s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.0002830028533935547s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 113.8362648487091s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 1.0795962810516357s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 9.78627610206604s
Interoperability | New terms check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 14.540968894958496s
Versatility | Languages check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 300.1729562282562s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 3.1738929748535156s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.23909306526184082s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 10.421187162399292s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.22801995277404785s
License | MR license check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.3325643539428711s
License | HR license check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 300.2332270145416s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.34332847595214844s
Understandability | Number of label check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 2.877389907836914s
Understandability | URI regex check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.7737512588500977s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.284822940826416s
Verifiability | Authors check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.21501851081848145s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.23907899856567383s
Performance | Throughput check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 11.087875604629517s
Amount of data | Check the number of entities for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 7.534027099609375e-05s
Verifiability | Contribs. check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.19821715354919434s
Interlinking | sameAs chians check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.19877862930297852s
Interlinking | skos check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.42679476737976074s
Interlinking | skos check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.4397430419921875s
Timeliness | dataset update frequency check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 6.675638914108276s
Currency | Creation date check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 1.5150535106658936s
Currency | Modification date check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 1.2800791263580322s
Rep.Conc. | URIs length for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 157.0922350883484s
Interoperability | New vocabularies check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 7.867813110351562e-06s
Consistency | Deprecated classes/propertiers check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.18378520011901855s
Accuracy | Check Functional Property for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.3294351100921631s
Accuracy | Check Inverse Functional Property for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.38004422187805176s
Accuracy | Check Empty annotation labels for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 36.84072232246399s
Accuracy | Check White space in annotation for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 2.705589771270752s
Accuracy | Check Datatype consistency for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 2.5981180667877197s
Consistency | Disjoint class check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.1928572654724121s
Consistency | Check Misplaced properties for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 85.92962002754211s
Consistency | Misplaced classes for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 8.356817722320557s
Consistency | Check Ontology hijacking for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 36.47897815704346s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined classes for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 1.4295082092285156s
Consistency | Check Invalid usage of undefined properties for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 83.60538005828857s
Conciseness | Check Extensional conciseness for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 2.8203134536743164s
Conciseness | Check Intensional conciseness for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.5590276718139648s
Security | Sign check for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.9395086765289307s
Availability | Check URIs Dereferenciability for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 10.071651935577393s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.6887662410736084s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.023082733154296875s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 1.7642974853515625e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 0.00080108642578125s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 4.744529724121094e-05s
Interoperability | Check the re-using of existing vocabs for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 1.430511474609375e-06s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Corine linked dataset @PSNC took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for Corine_linked_dataset took 2267.2311556339264s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 4.6253204345703125e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 0.00027251243591308594s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 0.6888542175292969s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 0.02121448516845703s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 1.1920928955078125e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 0.0007336139678955078s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 3.1948089599609375e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Hongcheon) Environmental Status took 7.62939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for corn took 5.662503957748413s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 4.315376281738281e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 0.0002665519714355469s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 0.258852481842041s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 0.020804405212402344s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 1.1205673217773438e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 0.0007410049438476562s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 2.9325485229492188e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Goesan) Environmental Status took 7.152557373046875e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for corn-s-famous-mountainous-district-goesan-environmental-status took 4.302447319030762s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 4.267692565917969e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 0.0002493858337402344s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 0.2420823574066162s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 0.02058577537536621s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 1.1682510375976562e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 0.0007679462432861328s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 3.075599670410156e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Corn's Famous mountainous district (Jeongseon) Environmental Status took 6.9141387939453125e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for corn-s-famous-mountainous-district-jeongseon-environmental-status took 2.9229207038879395s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Cornetto1.2 took 4.1961669921875e-05s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Cornetto1.2 took 0.0006947517395019531s
Completeness | Calculation of interlinking completeness for Cornetto1.2 took 0.2637462615966797s
Reputation | Calculation of the PageRank for Cornetto1.2 took 0.02065134048461914s
Interlinking | Calculation of Degree of Connection for Cornetto1.2 took 1.2159347534179688e-05s
Interlinking | Calculation of Centrality for Cornetto1.2 took 0.0007433891296386719s
Interlinking | Calculation of Clustering coefficient for Cornetto1.2 took 5.936622619628906e-05s
Believability | Calculation of trust value for Cornetto1.2 took 8.344650268554688e-06s
INFO | --- Analysis for cornetto took 14.422183513641357s
Availability | SPARQL endpoint availability check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.1506495475769043s
Availability | VoID file availability check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.0005104541778564453s
Extra | Recovery of all triples for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 93.90285325050354s
Performance | Total latancy measurement for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.5655462741851807s
Amount of data | Number of triples check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.6955058574676514s
Interoperability | New terms check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 12.135553121566772s
Versatility | Languages check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 300.1041166782379s
Interpretability | Number of blank nodes check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 2.6939902305603027s
Security | Check HTTPS for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.3437626361846924s
Interpretability | RDF structures check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.3277733325958252s
Versatility | Serialization formats check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 4.779205560684204s
Availability | RDF dump link check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.17963242530822754s
License | MR license check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.09620404243469238s
License | HR license check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.08338427543640137s
Amount of data | Number of property check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.10904240608215332s
Understandability | Number of label check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.11759543418884277s
Understandability | URI regex check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.17261695861816406s
Understandability | Vocabs check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.08929705619812012s
Verifiability | Authors check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.09073853492736816s
Verifiability | Publishers check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 0.10960626602172852s
Performance | Throughput check for Corporate Body Named Authority List  took 10.635422229766846s
